DETECTION OF MAGENTA, ARCHIL, AND CUDBEAR IN WINE.

These colors are not suitable for converting white wine into red, but

they can be used for giving wines a faint red tint, for darkening pale

red wines, and in making up a factitious bouquet essence, which is added

to red wines. The most suitable methods for the detection of magenta are

those given by Romei and Falieres-Ritter. If a wine colored with archil

and one colored with cudbear are treated treated according to Romei's

method, the former gives, with basic lead acetate, a blue, and the

latter a fine violet precipitate. The filtrate, if shaken up with amylic

alcohol, gives it in either case a red color. A knowledge of this fact

is important, or it may be mistaken for magenta. The behavior of the

amylic alcohol, thus colored red, with hydrochloric acid and ammonia is

characteristic. If the red color is due to magenta, it is destroyed by

both these reagents, while hydrocholoric acid does not decolorize the

solutions of archil and cudbear, and ammonia turns their red color to a

purple violet. If the wine is examined according to the Falieres-Ritter

method in presence of magenta, ether, when shaken up with the wine,

previously rendered ammoniacal, remains colorless, while if archil

or cudbear is present the ether is colored red. Wartha has made a

convenient modification in the Falieres-Ritter method by adding ammonia

and ether to the concentrated wine while still warm. If the red color of

the wool is due to archil or cudbear, it is extracted by hydrochloric

acid, which is colored red. Ammonia turns the color to a purple violet.

König mixed 50 c.c. wine with ammonia in slight excess, and places in

the mixture about one-half grm. clean white woolen yarn. The whole is

then boiled in a flask until all the alcohol and the excess of ammonia

are driven off. The wool taken out of the liquid and purified by washing

in water and wringing is moistened in a test-tube with pure potassa

lye at 10 per cent. It is carefully heated till the wool is completely

dissolved, and the solution, when cold, is mixed first with half its

volume of pure alcohol, upon which is carefully poured the same volume

of ether, and the whole is shaken. The stratum of ether decanted off is

mixed in a test-tube with a drop of acetic acid. A red color appears if

the slightest trace of magenta is present. The shaking must not be too

violent, lest an emulsion should be formed. If the wine is colored with

archil, on prolonged heating, after the addition of ammonia, it is

decolorized. If it is then let cool and shaken a little, the red color

returns. If the wool is taken out of the hot liquid after the red color

has disappeared, and exposed to the air, it takes a red color. But if

it is quickly taken out of the liquid and at once washed, there remains

merely a trace of color in the wool. If these precautions are observed,

magenta can be distinguished from archil with certainty according to

König's method. As the coloring-matter of archil is not precipitated

by baryta and magnesia, but changed to a purple, the baryta method,

recommended by Pasteur, Balard, and Wurtz, and the magnesia test, are

useless. Magenta may in course of time be removed by the precipitates

formed in the wine. It is therefore necessary to test not merely the

clear liquid, but the sediment, if any.--_Dr. B. Haas, in Budermann's

Centralblatt.--Analyst_.

* * * * *

Scientific American Supplement, No. 385, May 19, 1883 · 第 32 / 45 题