HORSE-BOAT TIMES.

Under another view of the case we have the following relations of horses

and steam to show that steam in 1872 is less economical than horses.

The captain of the _Vosburg_ states that he left West Troy in Oct.,

carrying over 100 tons of freight, after the _Baxter_ had left there for

Buffalo, _and with two mule teams_, alternating one with the other every

six hours, he arrived at Buffalo in advance of the _Baxter_; _through time

less than the Baxter's shortest time_. "Net time" not stated.

Publishing _net time_ of steamers instead of total or through time, is

deceptive, and creates a false impression with the community. Had not the

through time of steamers this season been suppressed, the governor of the

State would not have imagined five-day trips from Buffalo to New York, as

per his message, and our city editors would not have ventilated such

visionary pretensions. There are a multitude of horse-boat captains that

can reduce their _net canal time of movement_ below the _Baxter's_, which

has been so extensively commented upon; but their so doing would not

expedite the transfer of grain from the lakes to tide-water.

A certain horse-boat, in a former season, made two round trips from Buffalo

to and from New York in twenty days each, and on each trip lay three days

in New York. This made her through time _average_ between the cities 8-1/2

days each way. Her captain once towed in the "Line" and was only nine days

twenty hours from Buffalo to New York. This season a horse-boat made the

round trip from New York to and from Buffalo in twenty-one days.

These _round trips_ have probably never been exceeded by steam.

In the former era the prism of the canal seemed imbedded with innumerable

old and broken tow-lines, which the propeller, by its high velocity, sucked

up, and was thereby "fouled;" and now the sea-grass is a hidden enemy that

entwines itself around the propeller to foul it.

When the waters are low, forcing the engines of screw propellers lets the

stern of the boat "squat" or hug the bottom, and although these are minor

features of want of mechanical adaptation to canal duty, they illustrate

petty detentions serving to lengthen the through times of steam.

Hence, if we intermix the slow steamers with the fast ones, as we do the

slow with the fast horse-boats, for a _general average_, it is quite

probable that horse-times are fully equal to those of steam, and that the

excess of horse-cargoes makes a large and handsome advantage in their

favor.

_Therefore, under this general average, steam in 1872 is less economical

than horses._

History of Steam on the Erie Canal · 第 14 / 19 题