RELATIONS OF TIME--TWELVE YEARS AGO AND NOW.

The _Wack's_ through time from Buffalo to West Troy, with boat in tow, is

the same as the _Baxter's_ average without tow.

The _Ruggles'_ net time, from Buffalo to New York, with boat in tow, is

only 21 hours in excess of the _Baxter's_ shortest net time without tow.

The through times of the _Eclipse_ and _Gold Hunter_, from Buffalo to West

Troy, without tow, are just equal to the _Baxter's_ first and second trips.

The _Rotary's_ through time up, with half freight, is nearly one day less

than the _Byron's_, _Baxter's_ or _Newman's_ shortest through time. Her net

time is 17 hours less than the _Baxter's_ shortest net time.

The net time of the tugs, each with three boats in tow, is nearly equal to

the _Baxter's_ without tow, from Buffalo to West Troy.

Therefore, by this comparison of times, the one day extra allowed for the

greater steam resources of the former era with a boat in tow, is ample; and

the policy of that era is plainly more economical for freight than that of

the past two years.

* * * * *

WE THEREFORE OBSERVE: That the policy of introducing steam canal-boats as

carriers of freight, is illustrated in the _Niagara_, _Eclipse_, _Gold

Hunter_ and _Rotary_. The policy of carrying and towing one boat, in the

_Wack_, _Sternburg_, _Ruggles_, _City of Buffalo_ and _Viele_. The policy

of screw-tugs in the _Gov. King_, _Bemis_, _Washington_, _Lafayette_,

_Stimers_, _Dan Brown_ and the paddle-wheel tug _Fall Brook_. Under each

policy steam was a failure on the canals under the agencies tried. The

single carriers died first; the tugs second; the carriers and one boat

third; and last, the carriers with three-boat tows.

In 1861 and 1862, the policy of using the powerful canal steamers,

_Ruggles_ and _City of Buffalo_, to carry freight and tow three boats each,

was introduced to supersede the former policies. During these years the

privilege of priority at locks, by paying double toll on the boats, was

suspended, and soon thereafter steam was totally abandoned.

It is noticeable that the steamers for carrying, only, had less vitality,

and were less economical, than those for carrying and towing, and those for

carrying and towing but one boat had less than those for carrying and also

towing three boats.

Hence, the carrying steamers, or the automaton policy of 1871 and 1872,

can only compare with the automaton policy of the former era, and they must

have less vitality, and be less economical, than those other for carrying

and towing one boat, and still less than those for carrying and towing

three boats.

History of Steam on the Erie Canal · 第 12 / 19 题