“Why, yes; how else would you have them cooked?” I was asked in return;

and they too were shocked when I said the sight of that sodden mass

of flavourless starch and water made me sick--that it looked like

the remains of a boiled baby in the dish, boiled to a rag. For up to

then I had seen potatoes on the table as they appear when boiled in

their skins, peeled, and placed in a large shallow dish with a little

butter on them; and in that way they have the appearance of large

cream-coloured fruit, and send out an agreeable smell and have a nice

flavour.

Here was quite a different thing: this was the “homely potato” of the

British journalist--homely indeed!--stripped of its romance, spoiled

in the cooking, and made nasty to the eye. Yet this is how it is eaten

in every house in England! In Ireland and Scotland I found that the

potato was usually cooked in the proper way by people of the peasant

class. But what do the doctors, who make our digestions their life

study, say of this misuse of the potato? I don’t know. All I hear them

say about the potato is that if your digestion is bad you must not

eat it. What, then, will they say when I tell them that I have a weak

digestion, and whenever I have a bad turn I cure myself by dining for a

day or two on nothing but potatoes? Cooked in their skins, I scarcely

need add, and eaten with pepper and salt and butter. No soup or fish

or meats or sweets--nothing but potatoes for a day or two and I’m well

again. Perhaps they will say that I am not a normal subject. But we

needn’t bother about the doctors. Just now, while writing this chapter,

I asked my landlady’s daughter in the village in Cornwall where I am

staying if she had ever tasted a potato boiled in its jacket. Yes,

she had, once only, and didn’t like it because it didn’t taste like a

potato--such a funny flavour!

That “funny” flavour, so unlike the taste of the tuber boiled and

water-logged in the homely English way, is precisely the flavour which

makes it so nice to eat and so valuable as food; also, if I may slip in

the personal pathology or idiosyncratic abnormality, so perfect a cure

for indigestion. It is, in fact, the taste imparted by the salts which

mostly lie close beneath the skin, and are consequently thrown away

when the potato is peeled before boiling. You cannot avoid this waste

by scraping your potato, since scraping removes the waterproof skin,

and, the skin gone, the boiling water saturates the potato and carries

the salts away.

This is a serious matter in these days, when--as some of the newspapers

say--we are trying to economise in the matter of food, and when the

potato is beginning to be talked about. I suppose that there are about

thirty or forty millions of us who consume about half a pound of

potatoes every day; and it is not only the case that hundreds of tons

of excellent food are thrown away every day in the peeling process, but

that the most valuable elements in the potato are wasted. Perhaps the

war will teach us to value the potato properly, as, I believe, it is

and always has been valued in most countries outside these islands.

XXVII

JOHN-GO-TO-BED-AT-NOON

A longish name for a flower--one of its three names! After all it is

not saying very much; we have another better, more familiar one with

at least six names, and one of them not composed of six words like our

John’s, but of ten!

When it is spring I walk in sheltered places, by wood and hedge-side,

to look for and welcome the first comers. Oh those first flowers so

glad to be alive and out in the sun and wind once more--their first

early ineffable spring freshness, remembrancers of our lost childhood,

dead and lost these many dim and sorrowful years, now recovered with

the flowers, and immortal once more with spring’s immortality!

Do we not all experience a feeling something like that in an early

spring walk? Even a stockbroker or stockjobber knows a primrose when he

sees one, and it is a yellow primrose to him too--and something more. A

something to give him a thrill. It is as if he met a fairy-like child

in his walk who tossed back her shining tresses at his approach to look

up into his face with eyes full of laughter.

To me they are all like that. Look at this celandine, how it shines

with joy and starts up to meet you half-way, throwing its arms out for

the expected caress! And here too is my dear old little white friend,

the wild garlic--a whole merry crowd of them by the stone hedge; happy

meeting and happy greeting! Let me stoop to caress them and inhale

their warm breath. It is true there are those who don’t like it and

take their nice noses away when the flower would be glad to kiss them.

But when a flower has no fragrance to it, like the hyacinth and blue

columbine of these parts, or even red valerian--Pretty Betsy herself

blushing bright pink all over--it does not seem that they love as

warmly as the flower with a scented breath--sweet violet and sweet gale

and vernal squill and cowslip and many more, down to the water-mint by

the stream and my loving little white friend here by the stone hedge.

And when the first early blooms are gone with March, April, and May,

when it is full June, I wade in the lush meadow (when the farmer is

not about) to greet and talk to the taller ones, and alas! to say

good-bye to them at the same time, seeing that the mower will soon

come to make hay of them. One of the old friends I diligently seek

at this season is John, or Johnnie, tall as any there--tall as the

flaunting ox-eye daisies. Not that it is a particularly attractive

flower; I have never regarded it as pretty, but merely as one of those

yellow dandelion-shaped flowers which are so common with us. And it

is indeed in appearance a lesser dandelion on a thin tall plant, the

blooms, half-a-dozen or so to a plant, on long fine stems. It interests

me chiefly on account of its singular, unflowerlike behaviour, which

the name describes; also on account of its other queer name and the

meaning thereof. I don’t mean goat’s-beard, but its third old English

name which now, like many another, has grown offensive to ears

polite, and has long been banished from our flower books, and even

the dictionaries. One must go back to the old writers to find it in

print: not necessarily so far back as Chaucer, who is too disgusting

for anything, but to the Elizabethan and Carolines. The banned name,

however, is still in use in the rural districts.

What I have written so far was all I could have said about this yellow

flower until last summer; and if in time gone by any one had said to

me that a day would come when Johnnie would appear to me as a wonder

and delight, I should have laughed. Yet the strange experience actually

came to me last June.

At a Cornish village there was a field near the cottage where I was

staying, where my host had allowed his half-a-dozen cows to graze

during the winter months: in April he turned them out, and a month

later, passing by the field, it appeared to me that it would yield him

a heavy crop of grass. One morning in June, looking at the field from a

distance, it struck me that the hay would not be of a very good quality

since the entire area had now turned to bright yellow with some tall

flower that looked like ragwort among the grasses.

“What’s happened to your field--what is that yellow weed in it?” I said

to my man.

“Oh, that’s only----” then he pulled himself up, thinking in time that

I might be of the polite-eared tribe. “That’s a yellow flower,” he

finished.

“Yes, I see it is,” said I. “I’ll have a look at your flower after

lunch.”

But the pleasure of luncheon, especially of the omelettes my landlady

made so wonderfully well, caused me to forget all about it.

About three o’clock I was out walking, half a mile from the house, when

I looked back from the high ground at the village beneath me, and my

eye rested on the field about which we had talked that morning. “Now

what was it about that field?” said I to myself, trying to recover

something all but forgotten. Then I remembered that at noon it had

appeared all a sheet of yellow colour and was now of a uniform deep

rather dull green! It was very odd, but I had no time to investigate

until the following morning when, on visiting the field about ten

o’clock, I saw it in all its glory, the whole area resplendent with

its multitudinous crowded blooms of the dandelion orange-yellow, the

most luminous colour in Nature; and but for the wind that waved the

tall plants like a field of corn, mingling the vivid flower-tint with

the green beneath, the colour would have been too dazzling in that

brilliant sunshine. But it was the sunlight and the motion imparted

by the wind which made it so wonderful. A sheet of yellow buttercups

or a field thickly grown with dandelions does not produce this effect

owing to its want of motion. The stiffer the flower on its stem the

less vivid in appearance is its sentient life--the less does it enjoy

the air it breathes. These flowers, on tall pliant stems, danced in

the wind with a gladness greater than that of Wordsworth’s daffodils.

It was only when the first shock of wonder and delight was over,

that, looking closely at a flower, I made the discovery that it was

the goat’s-beard, the homely John-go-to-bed-at-noon, and the hardly

respectable--I dare not say what!

After that I visited the field three or four times a day and found that

the flower begins to open some time after sunrise and comes into its

fullest bloom about ten o’clock; that at noon it begins to close, but

for an hour or two the change is imperceptible, after which one notices

that the field is losing its lustre, the dimness gradually growing

until by three o’clock the field is all dark green again. John’s in

bed, tucked up, and in a deep sleep which will last quite seventeen

hours; then he won’t wake with a start, but slowly, slowly, yawning and

rubbing his yellow eyes and taking at least two hours to get out of bed.

I do not know what has been said by the authorities on the physiology

of plants on this habit of the flower, but it strikes the ordinary

person as something abnormal or unnatural. We all know many flowers

(the familiar daisy is one) which close in the evening, folding

themselves up or covering their round discs with their petals as a

child covers her face with her fingers, and this seems right and

natural and consistent with Nature’s plan. We are not yet acquainted

with all the secrets of a flower, but we at least know that its life

and growth are from the sun and suppose that when the light and heat

are withdrawn the work of elaboration going on within it is suspended,

that the flower is asleep and at rest until the vitalising influence

returns. Why then the extraordinary waste of daylight by this one

flower, when all others require all the light and heat they can get?

Has Johnnie’s “unconscious intelligence” found out an easier way--a

method of work by means of which he is able to accomplish in his day of

three or four hours as much as others can do in their twelve to sixteen

hours’ day? Johnnie then should be the right flower for the Socialist

to wear on his day, which would have to be in June.

I had asked my man how he could have let his field get into such a

condition, since the tough wiry stems of the goat’s-beard could not

be very good for his cows as winter feed, and all he could say was

that it “had come like that of itself”; that in the two previous years

there had been a slight sprinkling of the yellow flower--he didn’t

like to name it. But how it had come about was now plain to see,

for before he started mowing balls of down could be seen all over

the field, shedding myriads of seeds which would produce another

undesirable but exceedingly beautiful crop the following summer. The

lazy stay-in-bed-for-seventeen-hours goat’s-beard was actually ahead of

the other flowers in ripening its seed!

* * * * *

That shining yellow field, which continues to shine in memory, just now

serves to remind me of other plants and flowers that, commonly seen,

have no special attraction, but which occasionally find their day of

fullest perfection and triumph on some abandoned and waste ground--a

field perhaps once, long years ago, under cultivation.

I have described some cases of this kind in _Nature in Downland_, where

the turf was ruined for ever by the plough on the high South Downs a

century ago, then left for Nature to work her will on the desolated

spot. But we are most familiar with the sight of her beautifying

processes in the remains of mediaeval buildings scattered about the

land, in old castles and abbeys and towers, draped with ivy, the rough

stone walls flushed with green and grey and yellow colours of moss and

lichen and rainbow-tinted algae, decorated too with yellow wallflower,

ivy-leafed toad-flax, and red valerian. Thus Nature glorifies our

“builders of ruins.”

And going back to remoter ages, I have in my rambles come upon two

wonderfully beautiful flower effects, one in a Roman road, unused

probably since Roman times; the other more ancient still on a British

earthwork. I found the first one spring day when cycling over the

high down country near Dorchester. I caught sight of what looked to me

like a broad band of snow lying across the green hills. Coming to it I

found the old Roman road, which is there very distinct and has a closer

turf and a brighter green than the downs it lies across, so thickly

overgrown with daisies that the crowded flowers were actually touching

and had obliterated the green colour of the ground under them. It was

a wonderful sight, for all these millions of small blossoms occupied

the road only, not a daisy being seen on the green down on either side,

and the loveliness was of so rare a quality, so rich yet so delicate,

a beauty almost supernatural, that I could not bear to walk or ride on

it. It was like a road leading to some unearthly brighter place--some

paradise of flowers.

In the other case the site was an earthwork in Wiltshire, built

probably thousands of years ago, and the flower selected to decorate it

was the yellow bird’s-foot trefoil.

There are in that part of Wiltshire many such remains, grim dykes,

with or without walls at the side, and walls with a foss on one or in

some instances on both sides. This one was a very deep ditch at the

side of a wall ten to fifteen feet high, with a flat top eight to ten

feet broad. It winds over a large down then dips down to a broad level

valley, and rising over the hill opposite disappears at last in the

arable land on that side. Standing on the high down or on the top of

the wall it has the shape and appearance of a vast green serpent with

its mile-long coil lying in a series of curves across the earth. As in

the case of the old Roman green roads, the turf of the earthwork is a

different and brighter shade of green than that of the valley.

At this place I once met and had a long talk about the far past with

a man of a singularly lively mind for a Wiltshire peasant. He told me

that on numberless occasions since his boyhood he had stood looking at

this great earthwork in wonder, asking himself who and what the people

were that made it. “I have often,” he said, “had the idea that they

must have been mad; for allowing that they had a use for such a wall

and ditch why did they make it go winding all over the place instead of

carrying it in a straight line and saving more than half the labour it

cost to build it?” I could only suggest in reply that it was no doubt a

very ancient earthwork, dating back to the time when metal tools were

unknown in England and that the chalk had to be scooped up with sharp

flints; that when they came to a very hard bit they had to make a bend

to get round it. I also assured him that they could not have been mad

as no such disease was known to the old ancient people.

Now in spring the flat top of this earthwork in all that space where it

lies across the level valley, the broad level top of the bank is grown

over with the bird’s-foot trefoil, the yellow flowers as crowded as the

daisies on the old Roman road, with not one flower to be seen growing

on the green sloping sides. A green serpent still in appearance but

its whole back now a shining yellow.

When I dream of South Wiltshire in spring, when the wild flowers are in

bloom, it is to look again on that wonderful green and yellow serpent.

XXVIII

THE CHEQUERED DAFFODIL AND THE GLORY OF WILD FLOWERS

Never a season passes, never a month nor a week, nor even a day, when

I’m wandering in quest of the sights and sounds that draw the field

naturalist, but I stumble on something notable never previously seen,

or never seen in the same charming aspect. And the fact that it is

stumbled on when not looked for, that it comes as a complete surprise,

greatly enhances the charm. It may be a bird or mammal, or some rare or

lustrous insect, but it is in plant life where the happy discoveries

are most frequent, even to one who is not a “painfull and industrious

searcher of plantes” and knows little of their science. For not only

are the species so numerous as to be practically innumerable to one who

desires to see all things for himself, but many of the most attractive

kinds are either rare or exceedingly local in their distribution. I

will give a few instances.

What a delightful experience it was one cold sunny day in April when

I sought shelter from the furious wind at a huge rocky headland at

Zennor on the Cornish coast, and found the turf at the foot of the

rocks jewelled with the first vernal squills! And what a thrill of joy

in Scotland one June, when coming to a narrow green valley between

high rocks and woods I had my first sight of the exquisite grass of

Parnassus flowering in profusion!

One day, cycling from Salisbury to Winterbourne Gunner, I found a

pretty red flower new to me growing by the roadside in great abundance;

for a distance of three or four hundred yards the hedge-side was

thickly sprinkled with its lovely little stars. It was a geranium,

prettier than any red geranium known to me, the delicate colour

resembling that of the red horse-chestnut. It was the _Geranium

pyrenaicum_, native of central and eastern Europe, and by some

botanists supposed to be indigenous in this country. Probably the

colour varies, as some of the books describe it as purple or pale

purple.

My delight was greater when I first came upon the large blue geranium

growing among the South Wiltshire downs. The large loose plant with

large flowers and deep-cut leaves reminded me of the geranium-leafed

scented mallow, one of my favourites, and these two plants became

associated in my mind, but the mallow is rosy pink and the geranium a

pure divine (or human) blue.

One of the rarest, and to my mind one of the most beautiful, flowers

in England is the bastard balm; I have never found it but once, and it

was the way in which it came before me that has given it such a lustre

in my mind. I was motoring with friends from Land’s End to London, when

in coming through the hilly country near Tavistock I caught sight of

a flower unknown to me on a tall stalk among the thick herbage at the

roadside, and shouted to the chauffeur to stop. He did so after rushing

on a farther hundred yards or so, but very reluctantly, as he was angry

with the hills and anxious to get to Exeter. I walked back and secured

my strange lovely flower, and for the rest of the day it was a delight

to us, and I’m pretty sure that its image exists still and shines in

the memory of all who were with me in the car that day--the chauffeur

excepted.

I am bringing too many flowers into this chapter, since only one is

named in the title, but once I begin to think of them they keep me, and

a dream of fair flowers is as much to me as that Dream of Fair Women

is to the Tennysons and Swinburnes who write poetry. Or perhaps they

are more like fair little girls than grown women, the beautiful little

dear ones I loved and remember--Alice and Doris, and pensive Monica,

“laughing Allegra and Edith with golden hair,” and dozens more. But I

must really break away from this crowd to concentrate on my chequered

daffodil, only I must first be allowed to mention just one more--the

blue columbine, the wild flower, always true blue and supposed to be

indigenous. I don’t believe it; I imagine for various reasons that

it is a garden escape dating back to the Roman occupation, which

gives it a better title by some eighteen centuries to be described as

British than dozens of our wild flowers. The charming sanfoin, common

as the gipsy rose in our fields, the wild musk that flourishes by a

thousand streams from Land’s End to the Western Islands, the winter

heliotrope that spreads its green mantle over so much of England, are

by comparison aliens that emigrated but yesterday to our shores.

It was in Wiltshire again that I found my first columbines, in a vast

thicket of furze, may, and blackthorn covering about twenty acres of

ground. The plants were tall, the thin wiry stems being two or three

feet long, and produced few leaves, but flowers as large as those of

the garden plant. An old keeper who had charge of the ground told me he

had known the flower from his boyhood, and that formerly he could fill

a barrow with “collar-binds,” as he called them, any day. It was a rare

pleasure to see that columbine in its own home--the big blue quaint

flower that looked at you from its shelter of rough furze and thorn

bushes; and for the first time in my life I admired it, since in the

garden, where as a rule its peculiar beauty is dimmed by other garden

blooms, it has an inharmonious setting. But I must say of the colour

that albeit a true floral blue it is a blue of the earth, the material

world we inhabit, not the divine (or human) blue of the blue geranium

nor the more ethereal blue of the vernal squill on the sea-cliffs, and

of the wild hyacinth seen in sheets of colour under the woodland trees.

These are the floral blues that bring heaven down to us.

It is not strange perhaps that this flower should be known by bird

names, but it is odd that the names should be of birds so wide apart in

our minds as eagle and dove. _Aquilegia_, because the inverted tubes

at the base of the flower are like the curved claws of an eagle; and

columbine from its dove-like appearance, each blossom forming a cluster

of fine dark blue fairy fan-tails, with beaks that meet at the stem,

wings open, and tails outspread.

This great find made me think that I had come into a columbine country,

and I set out to look for it, but failed to find or even hear of it

anywhere in that district except at one spot on the border of Wilts and

Dorset. This was a tiny rustic village hidden among high downs, one of

the smallest, loveliest, most out-of-the-world villages in England.

In the small ancient church I found a mural tablet to the memory of

the poet Browning’s grandfather, whose humble life had been spent in

that neighbourhood. So rare was it for a stranger to appear in this

lost village that half of the population, all the forty schoolchildren

included, were eager to talk to me all the time I spent in it, and they

all knew all about the columbine. It had been abundant half a mile from

the village by the hedges and among the furze bushes, and every summer

the children were accustomed to go out and gather the flowers, and

they were seen in every cottage; and as a result of this misuse the

flower had been extirpated.

They wished it would come again!

If comparatively few persons have seen the blue native columbine, just

as few perhaps have found, growing wild, that more enchanting flower,

the snake’s-head or fritillary. Guinea-flower and bastard narcissus

and turkey-caps are some of its old English names, the last still in

common use; but the name by which all educated persons now call it is

also very old. Two centuries and a half ago a writer on plants spoke of

it as “a certaine strange flower which is called by some Fritillaria.”

Another very old name, which I like best, is chequered daffodil. As a

garden flower we know it, and we also know the wild flower bought in

shops or sent as a gift from friends at a distance. In most instances

the flowers I have seen in houses were from the Christchurch Meadows at

Oxford.

I know what white, what purple fritillaries

The grassy harvest of the river-fields

Above by Ensham, down by Sandford, yields,

says Matthew Arnold in his beautiful monody; the wonder is that it

should yield so many. But to see the flower in its native river-fields

is the main thing; in a vase on a table in a dim room it is no better

than a blushing briar-rose or any other lovely wild bloom removed from

its proper atmosphere and surroundings.

The book of a naturalist · 第 18 / 20 段