M. Stock.--“I can enumerate four of these documents, if you like.”

The Judge.--“We are not concerned with the Dreyfus case.”

The next witness was M. Lalance, who formerly sat in the German

reichstag representing Alsace-Lorraine, as protesting deputy.

“I would like,” said the witness, “to tell the jury something about

the origins of this affair. I was acquainted with the Sandherr and

Dreyfus families,--that is, with the family of the accuser and the

family of the accused. I have lived with them and seen them very

closely. The elder Sandherr was a Protestant who became a Catholic

and showed the intolerance of all neophytes. In 1870, the time of

the war, bands of people said to be directed by him ran through the

streets of Mulhouse, crying: ‘Down with the Prussians of the interior!’

These Prussians were the Protestants and Jews. These cries found no

echo. Protestants, Jews, and Catholics all did their duty during the

war and after it. When in 1874 the provinces were called upon to send

deputies to Berlin, it was a Jew who nominated the bishop of Metz, and

the Protestant deputies were nominated by the priests. The younger

Sandherr, the colonel, whom I knew from childhood, was a good soldier

and a brave and loyal citizen, but he had inherited his father’s

intolerance. Furthermore, in 1893 he fell a victim to the brain disease

of which he was to die three years later. In that year he was sent

to Bussang to be cured. During his stay there, there was a patriotic

ceremony,--the return of the flag to the regiment of light infantry.

All the bathers went to see it. Near them was a Jew, undoubtedly

an Alsatian, who wept with emotion. Colonel Sandherr turned to his

neighbors, and said to them: ‘I distrust those tears.’ His neighbors

asked him to explain, saying to him: ‘We know that there were Jewish

officers in the army who were patriotic and intelligent and did their

duty.’ Colonel Sandherr answered: ‘I distrust them all.’ Such was

the man, gentlemen of the jury, who proffered the accusation. It is

legitimate to suppose that he was governed by his feelings rather than

by justice. As for the Dreyfus family” ...

The Judge.--“Say nothing of Dreyfus.”

The trial of Emile Zola: containing M. Zola's letter to President Faure relating to the Dreyfus case, and a full report of the fifteen days' proceedings in the Assize Court of the Seine, including testimony of witnesses and speeches of counsel · 第 261 / 282 题