XI. ALEXANDER GORDON OF EARLSTON

'A man of great spirit, but much subdued by inward exercise.'

Livingstone's _Characteristics_.

The Gordons of Airds and Earlston could set their family seal to the

truth of the promise that the mercy of the Lord is from everlasting to

everlasting upon them that fear Him, and His righteousness to children's

children. For the life of grace entered the Gordon house three long

generations before it came to our Alexander of to-night, and it still

descended upon his son and his son's son. His great-grandfather,

Alexander Gordon also, was early nicknamed 'Strong Sandy,' on account of

his gigantic size and his Samson-like strength. While yet a young man,

happily for himself and for all his future children, as well as for the

whole of Galloway, Gordon had occasion to cross the English border on

some family business, to buy cattle or cutlery or what not, when he made

a purchase he had not intended to make when he set out. He brought home

with him a copy of Wycliffe's contraband New Testament, and from the day

he bought that interdicted book till the day of his death, Strong Sandy

Gordon never let his purchase out of his own hands. He carried his

Wycliffe about with him wherever he went, to kirk and to market; he would

as soon have thought of leaving his purse or his dirk behind him as his

Wycliffe, his bosom friend. And many were the Sabbath-days that the

laird of Earlston read his New Testament in the woods of Earlston to his

tenants and neighbours, the Testament in the one hand and the dirk in the

other. Tamed and softened as old Sandy Gordon became by that taming and

softening book, yet there were times when the old Samson still came to

the surface. As the Sabbath became more and more sanctified in Reformed

Scotland, the Saints' days of the Romish Calendar fell more and more into

open neglect, till the Romish clergy got an Act passed for the enforced

observance of all the fasts and festivals of the Romish Communion. One

of the enacted clauses forbade a plough to be yoked on Christmas Day, on

pain of the forfeiture and public sale of the cattle that drew the

plough. Old Earlston, at once to protest against the persecution, and at

the same time to save his draught-oxen, yoked ten of his stalwart sons to

the mid-winter plough, and, after ploughing the whole of Christmas Day,

openly defied both priest and bishop to distrain his team. Christmas

Day, whatever its claims and privileges might be, had no chance in

Scotland till it came with better reasons than the threat of a Popish

king and Parliament. The Patriarch of Galloway, as the south of Scotland

combined to call old Alexander Gordon of Earlston, lived to the ripe age

of over a hundred years, and we are told that he kept family worship

himself to the day of his death, holding his Wycliffe in his own hand,

and yielding it and his place at the family altar over to none.

But it is with the name-son and great-grandson of this sturdy old saint

that we have chiefly to do to-night. And I may say of him, to begin

with, that he was altogether worthy to inherit and to hand on the

tradition of family grace and truth that had begun so early and so

conspicuously with the head of the Earlston house. 'Alexander Gordon of

Earlston,' says John Livingstone, in one of his priceless little

etchings, 'was a man of great spirit, but much subdued by inward

exercise, and who attained the most rare experiences of downcasting and

uplifting.' And in Rutherford's first letter to this Earlston, written

from Anwoth in 1636, he says, in that lofty oracular way of his, 'Jesus

Christ has said that Alexander Gordon must lead the ring in Galloway in

witnessing a good conscience.' This, no doubt, refers to the prosecution

that Gordon was at that moment undergoing at the hands of the Bishop of

Glasgow for refusing to admit a nominee of the Bishop into the pulpit of

a reclaiming parish. It would have gone still worse with Earlston than

it did had not Lord Lorne, the true patron of the parish, taken his place

beside Earlston at the Bishop's bar, and testified his entire approval of

all that Earlston had done. With all that, the case did not end till

Earlston was banished beyond the Tay for his resistance to the will of

the Bishop of Glasgow. This all took place in the early half of the

seventeenth century, so that Dr. Robert Buchanan might with more

correctness have entitled his able book 'The Two Hundred Years' Conflict'

than 'The Ten,' so early was the battle for Non-Intrusion begun in

Galloway. Alexander Gordon was a Free Churchman 200 years before the

Disruption, and Lord Lorne was the forerunner of those evangelical and

constitutional noblemen and gentlemen in Scotland who helped so much to

carry through the Disruption of 1843. We find both Lord Lorne, and

Earlston his factor, sitting as elders beside one another in the Glasgow

Assembly of 1638, and then we find Earlston the member for Galloway in

the Parliament of 1641.

We do not know exactly on what occasion it was that Earlston refused to

accept the knighthood that was offered him by the Crown; but we seem to

hear the old Wycliffite come back again in his great-grandson as he said,

'No, your Majesty, excuse and pardon me; but no.' Alexander Gordon felt

that it would be an everlasting dishonour to him and to his house to let

his shoulder be touched in knighthood by a sword that was wet, and that

would soon be still more wet, with the best blood in Scotland. 'No, your

Majesty, no.'

Almost all that we are told about Earlston in the histories of his time

bears out the greatness of his spirit; that, and the stories that gives

rise to, take the eye of the ordinary historian; but good John

Livingstone, though not a great historian in other respects, is by far

the best historian of that day for our purpose. John Livingstone's

_Characteristics_ is a perfect gallery of spiritual portraits, and the

two or three strokes he gives to Alexander Gordon make him stand out

impressively and memorably to all who understand and care for the things

of the Spirit.

'A man of great spirit, but much subdued by inward exercise.' I do not

need to tell you what exercise is--at least bodily exercise. All that a

man does to draw out, develop, and healthfully occupy his bodily powers

in walking, riding, running, wrestling, carrying burdens, and leaping

over obstacles--all that is called bodily exercise, and some part of that

is absolutely necessary every day for the health of the body and for the

continuance and the increase of its strength. But we are not all body;

we are soul as well, and much more soul than body. Bodily exercise

profiteth little, says the Apostle,--compared, that is, with the exercise

of the soul, of the mind, and of the heart. Now, Alexander Gordon was

such an athlete of the heart that all who knew him saw well what exercise

he must have gone through before he was subdued in his high mind and

proud spirit to be so humble, so meek, so silent, so unselfish, and so

full of godliness and brotherly kindness--what a world of inward exercise

all that bespoke! Alexander Gordon's patience under wrong, his low

esteem of himself and of all he did, his miraculous power over himself in

the forgiveness of enemies and in the forgetfulness of injuries, his

contentment amid losses and disappointments, his silence when other men

were bursting to speak, and his openness to be told that when he did

speak he had spoken rashly, unadvisedly, and offensively--in all that

Earlston was a conspicuous example of what inward exercise carried on

with sufficient depth and through a sufficiently long life will do even

for a man of a hot temper and a proud heart. Alexander Gordon had, to

begin with, a large heart. A large heart was a family possession of the

Gordons; the fathers had it and the mothers had it; and whatever came and

went in the family estate, the Gordon heart was always entailed

unimpaired--increased indeed--upon the children. And after some

generations of true religion, inwardly and deeply exercising the Gordon

heart, it almost came as a second nature to our Gordon to take to heart

all that happened to him, and to exercise his large and deep heart yet

more thoroughly with it. The affairs of the family, the affairs of the

estate, the affairs of the Church, his duties as a landlord, a farmer, a

heritor, and a factor, and the persecutions and sufferings that all these

things brought upon him, some of which we know--all that found its way

into Earlston's wide and deep and still unsanctified heart. And then,

there is a law and a provision in the life of grace that all those men

come to discover who live before God as Earlston lived, a provision that

secures to such men's souls a depth, and an inwardness, and an increasing

exercise that carries them on to reaches of inward sanctification that

the ruck and run of so-called Christians know nothing about, and are

incapable of knowing.

Such men as Earlston, while the daily rush of outward things is let in

deeply into their hearts, are not restricted to these things for the

fulness of their inward exercise; their own hearts, though there were no

outward world at all, would sufficiently exercise them to all the gifts

and graces and attainments of the profoundest spiritual life. For one

thing, when once Earlston had begun to keep watch over his own heart in

the matter of its motives--it was David Dickson, one fast-day at Irvine,

on 1 Sam. ii., who first taught Gordon to watch his motives--from that

day Rutherford and Livingstone, and all his family, and all his fellow-

elders saw a change in their friend that almost frightened them. There

was after that such a far-off tone in his letters, and such a far-off

look in his eyes, and such a far-off sound in his voice as they all felt

must have come from some great, and, to them, mysterious advance in his

spiritual life; but he never told even his son William what it was that

had of late so softened and quieted his proud and stormy heart. But, all

the time, it was his motives. The baseness of his motives even when he

did what it was but his duty and his praise to do, that quite killed

Earlston every day. The loathsomeness of a heart that hid such motives

in its unguessed depths made him often weep in the woods which his

grandfather had sanctified by his Bible readings a century before.

Rutherford saw with the glance of genius what was going on in his

friend's heart, when, in one letter, not referring to himself at all,

Earlston suddenly said, 'If Lucifer himself would but look deep enough

and long enough into his own heart, the sight of it would make him a

little child.' 'Did not I say,' burst out Rutherford, as he read, 'that

Alexander Gordon would lead the ring in Galloway?'

Earlston frightened into silence the Presbytery of Kirkcudbright on one

occasion also, when at their first meeting after he had spoken out so

bravely before the king and the Parliament, and they were to move him a

vote of thanks, he cried out: 'Fathers and brethren, the heart is

deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked, and you do not know

it. For I had a deep, malicious, revengeful motive in my heart behind

all my fine and patriotic speeches in Parliament. I hated Montrose more

than I loved the freedom of the Kirk. Spare me, therefore, the sentence

of putting that act of shame on your books!' It was discoveries like

this that accumulated in John Livingstone's note-book till he blotted out

all his instances and left only the blessed result, 'Alexander Gordon, a

man of great spirit, but much subdued by inward exercise, and who was

visited with most rare experiences of downcasting and uplifting.' No

doubt, dear John Livingstone; we can well believe it. Too rare with us,

alas! but every day with your noble friend; every day and every night,

when he lay down and when he rose up. His very dreams often cast him

down all day after them; for he said, If my heart were not one of the

chambers of hell itself, such hateful things would not stalk about in it

when the watchman is asleep. Downcastings! downcastings! Yes, down to

such depths of self-discovery and self-detestation and self-despair as

compelled his Heavenly Master to give commandment that His prostrate

servant should be lifted up as few men on the earth have ever been lifted

up, or could bear to be. Yes; they were rare experiences both of

downcastings and of upliftings; when such downcastings and upliftings

become common the end of this world will have come, and with it the very

Kingdom of Heaven.

The last sight we see of Alexander Gordon in this world is after his

Master has given commandment that the last touch be put to His servant's

subdued and childlike humility. The old saint is sitting in his

grandfather's chair and his wife is feeding him like a weaned child. John

Livingstone tells that Mr. John Smith, a minister in Teviotdale, had all

the Psalms of David by heart, and that instead of a curtailed,

monotonous, and mechanical grace before meat he always repeated a whole

Psalm. Earlston must have remembered once dining in the Manse of Maxton

at a Communion time; for, as his tender-handed wife took her place beside

his chair to feed her helpless husband, he always lifted up his palsied

hand and always said to himself, to her, and above all, to God, the 131st

Psalm--

'As child of mother weaned; my soul

Is like a weaned child;'

till all the godly households in Galloway knew the 131st Psalm as

Alexander Gordon of Earlston's grace before meat.

Samuel Rutherford and Some of His Correspondents · 第 11 / 24 题