MAGLIABECHI.

Anthony Magliabechi, who died at the age of eighty, was celebrated for

his great knowledge of books. He has been called the _Helluo_, or the

Glutton of Literature, as Peter _Comestor_ received his nickname from

his amazing voracity for food he could never digest; which appeared when

having fallen sick of so much false learning, he threw it all up in his

"_Sea of Histories_," which proved to be the history of all things, and

a bad history of everything. Magliabechi's character is singular; for

though his life was wholly passed in libraries, being librarian to the

Duke of Tuscany, he never _wrote_ himself. There is a medal which

represents him sitting, with a book in one hand, and a great number of

books scattered on the ground. The candid inscription signifies, that

"it is not sufficient to become learned to have read much, if we read

without reflection." This is the only remains we have of his own

composition that can be of service to posterity. A simple truth, which

may, however, be inscribed in the study of every man of letters.

His habits of life were uniform. Ever among his books, he troubled

himself with no other concern whatever; and the only interest he

appeared to take for any living thing was his spiders. While sitting

among his literary piles, he affected great sympathy for these weavers

of webs, and perhaps in contempt of those whose curiosity appeared

impertinent, he frequently cried out, "to take care not to hurt his

spiders!" Although he lost no time in writing himself, he gave

considerable assistance to authors who consulted him. He was himself an

universal index to all authors; the late literary antiquary, Isaac Reed,

resembled him.[108] He had one book, among many others, dedicated to

him, and this dedication consisted of a collection of titles of works

which he had had at different times dedicated to him, with all the

eulogiums addressed to him in prose and verse. When he died, he left his

vast collection for the public use; they now compose the public library

of Florence.

Heyman, a celebrated Dutch professor, visited this erudite librarian,

who was considered as the ornament of Florence. He found him amongst his

books, of which the number was prodigious. Two or three rooms in the

first story were crowded with them, not only along their sides, but

piled in heaps on the floor; so that it was difficult to sit, and more

so to walk. A narrow space was contrived, indeed, so that by walking

sideways you might extricate yourself from one room to another. This was

not all; the passage below stairs was full of books, and the staircase

from the top to the bottom was lined with them. When you reached the

second story, you saw with astonishment three rooms, similar to those

below, equally so crowded, that two good beds in these chambers were

also crammed with books.

This apparent confusion did not, however, hinder Magliabechi from

immediately finding the books he wanted. He knew them all so well, that

even to the least of them it was sufficient to see its outside, to say

what it was; he knew his flock, as shepherds are said, by their faces;

and indeed he read them day and night, and never lost sight of any.[109]

He ate on his books, he slept on his books, and quitted them as rarely

as possible. During his whole life he only went twice from Florence;

once to see Fiesoli, which is not above two leagues distant, and once

ten miles further by order of the Grand Duke. Nothing could be more

simple than his mode of life; a few eggs, a little bread, and some

water, were his ordinary food. A drawer of his desk being open, Mr.

Heyman saw there several eggs, and some money which Magliabechi had

placed there for his daily use. But as this drawer was generally open,

it frequently happened that the servants of his friends, or strangers

who came to see him, pilfered some of these things; the money or the

eggs.

His dress was as cynical as his repasts. A black doublet, which

descended to his knees; large and long breeches; an old patched black

cloak; an amorphous hat, very much worn, and the edges ragged; a large

neckcloth of coarse cloth, begrimed with snuff; a dirty shirt, which he

always wore as long as it lasted, and which the broken elbows of his

doublet did not conceal; and, to finish this inventory, a pair of

ruffles which did not belong to the shirt. Such was the brilliant dress

of our learned Florentine; and in such did he appear in the public

streets, as well as in his own house. Let me not forget another

circumstance; to warm his hands, he generally had a stove with fire

fastened to his arms, so that his clothes were generally singed and

burnt, and his hands scorched. He had nothing otherwise remarkable about

him. To literary men he was extremely affable, and a cynic only to the

eye; anecdotes almost incredible are related of his memory. It is

somewhat uncommon that as he was so fond of literary _food_, he did not

occasionally dress some dishes of his own invention, or at least some

sandwiches to his own relish. He indeed should have written CURIOSITIES

OF LITERATURE. He was a living Cyclopaedia, though a dark lantern.[110]

Of such reading men, Hobbes entertained a very contemptible, if not a

rash opinion. His own reading was inconsiderable; and he used to say,

that if he had spent as much time in _reading_ as other men of learning,

he should have been as _ignorant_ as they. He put little value on a

_large library_, for he considered all _books_ to be merely _extracts_

and _copies_, for that most authors were like sheep, never deviating

from the beaten path. History he treated lightly, and thought there were

more lies than truths in it. But let us recollect after all this, that

Hobbes was a mere metaphysician, idolising his own vain and empty

hypotheses. It is true enough that weak heads carrying in them too much

reading may be staggered. Le Clerc observes of two learned men, De

Marcilly and Barthius, that they would have composed more useful works

had they _read_ less numerous authors, and digested the better writers.

Curiosities of Literature, Vol. 1 · 第 386 / 428 题