FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 96: Since this article was written, many of these ancient

Mysteries and Moralities have been printed at home and abroad. Hone, in

his "Ancient Mysteries Described," 1825, first gave a summary of the

_Ludus Coventriæ,_ the famous mysteries performed by the trading

companies of Coventry; the entire series have been since printed by the

Shakspeare Society, under the editorship of Mr. Halliwell, and consist

of forty-two dramas, founded on incidents in the Old and New Testaments.

The equally famous _Chester Mysteries_ were also printed by the same

society under the editorship of Mr. Wright, and consist of twenty-five

long dramas, commencing with "The Fall of Lucifer," and ending with

"Doomsday." In 1834, the Abbotsford Club published some others from the

Digby MS., in the Bodleian Library, Oxford. In 1825, Mr. Sharp, of

Coventry, published a dissertation on the Mysteries once performed

there, and printed the Pageant of the Sheremen and Taylor's Company; and

in 1836 the Abbotsford Club printed the Pageant played by the Weavers of

that city. In 1836, the Surtees Society published the series known as

_The Towneley Mysteries,_ consisting of thirty-two dramas; in 1838, Dr.

Marriott published in English, at Basle, a selection of the most curious

of these dramas. In 1837, M. Achille Jubinal published two octavo

volumes of French "Mystères inédits du Quinzième Siècle." This list

might be swelled by other notes of such books, printed within the last

thirty years, in illustration of these early religious dramas.]

[Footnote 97: In Jubinal's _Tapisseries Anciennes_ is engraved that

found in the tent of Charles the Bold, at Nancy, and still preserved in

that city. It is particularly curious, inasmuch as it depicts the

incidents described in the Morality above-named.]

[Footnote 98: The British Museum library was enriched in 1845 by a very

curions collection of these old comic plays, which was formed about

1560. It consists of sixty-four dramas, of which number only five or six

were known before. They are exceedingly curious as pictures of early

manners and amusements; very simple in construction, and containing few

characters. One is a comic dialogue between two persons as to the best

way of managing a wife. Another has for its plot the adventure of a

husband sent from home by the seigneur of the village, that he may

obtain access to his wife; and who is checkmated by the peasant, who

repairs to the neglected lady of the seigneur. Some are entirely

composed of allegorical characters; all are broadly comic, in language

equally broad. They were played by a jocular society, whose chief was

termed Prince des Sots; hence the name Sotties given to the farces.]

[Footnote 99: The peasants of the Ober-Ammergau, a village in the

Bavarian Alps, still perform, at intervals of ten years, a long miracle

play, detailing the chief incidents of the Passion of our Saviour from

his entrance into Jerusalem to his ascension. It is done in fulfilment

of a vow made during a pestilence in 1633. The performance lasted twelve

hours in 1850, when it was last performed. The actors were all of the

peasant class.]

"CRITICAL SAGACITY," AND "HAPPY CONJECTURE;" OR, BENTLEY'S MILTON.

----BENTLEY, long to wrangling schools confined,

And but by books acquainted with mankind----

To MILTON lending sense, to HORACE wit,

He makes them write, what never poet writ.

DR. BENTLEY'S edition of our English Homer is sufficiently known by

name. As it stands a terrifying beacon to conjectural criticism, I shall

just notice some of those violations which the learned critic ventured

to commit, with all the arrogance of a Scaliger. This man, so deeply

versed in ancient learning, it will appear, was destitute of taste and

genius in his native language.

Our critic, to persuade the world of the necessity of his edition,

imagined a fictitious editor of Milton's Poems: and it was this

ingenuity which produced all his absurdities. As it is certain that the

blind bard employed an amanuensis, it was not improbable that many words

of similar sound, but very different signification, might have

disfigured the poem; but our Doctor was bold enough to conjecture that

this amanuensis _interpolated_ whole verses of his own composition in

the "Paradise Lost!" Having laid down this fatal position, all the

consequences of his folly naturally followed it. Yet if there needs any

conjecture, the more probable one will be, that Milton, who was never

careless of his future fame, had his poem _read_ to him after it had

been published. The first edition appeared in 1667, and the second in

1674, in which all the faults of the former edition are continued. By

these _faults_, the Doctor means what _he_ considers to be such: for we

shall soon see that his "Canons of Criticism" are apocryphal.

Bentley says that he will _supply_ the want of manuscripts to collate

(to use his own words) by his own "SAGACITY," and "HAPPY CONJECTURE."

Milton, after the conclusion of Satan's speech to the fallen angels,

proceeds thus:--

1. He spake: and to confirm his words out flew

2. Millions of flaming _swords_, drawn from the thighs

3. Of mighty cherubim: the sudden blaze

4. Far round illumin'd hell; highly they rag'd

5. Against the Highest; and fierce with grasped _arms_

6. Clash'd on their sounding shields the din of war,

7. Hurling defiance tow'rd the _Vault_ of heaven.

In this passage, which is as perfect as human wit can make, the Doctor

alters three words. In the second line he puts _blades_ instead of

_swords_; in the fifth he puts _swords_ instead of _arms_; and in the

last line he prefers _walls_ to _vault_. All these changes are so many

defoedations of the poem. The word _swords_ is far more poetical than

_blades_, which may as well be understood of _knives_ as _swords_. The

word _arms_, the generic for the specific term, is still stronger and

nobler than _swords_; and the beautiful conception of _vault_, which is

always indefinite to the eye, while the solidity of _walls_ would but

meanly describe the highest Heaven, gives an idea of grandeur and

modesty.

Curiosities of Literature, Vol. 1 · 第 358 / 428 题