POETS, PHILOSOPHERS, AND ARTISTS, MADE BY ACCIDENT.

Accident has frequently occasioned the most eminent geniuses to display

their powers. "It was at Rome," says Gibbon, "on the 15th of October,

1764, as I sat musing amidst the ruins of the Capitol, while the

bare-footed friars were singing vespers in the Temple of Jupiter, that

the idea of writing the Decline and Fall of the City first started to my

mind."

Father Malebranche having completed his studies in philosophy and

theology without any other intention than devoting himself to some

religious order, little expected the celebrity his works acquired for

him. Loitering in an idle hour in the shop of a bookseller, and turning

over a parcel of books, _L'Homme de Descartes_ fell into his hands.

Having dipt into parts, he read with such delight that the palpitations

of his heart compelled him to lay the volume down. It was this

circumstance that produced those profound contemplations which made him

the Plato of his age.

Cowley became a poet by accident. In his mother's apartment he found,

when very young, Spenser's Fairy Queen; and, by a continual study of

poetry, he became so enchanted by the Muse, that he grew irrecoverably a

poet.

Sir Joshua Reynolds had the first fondness for his art excited by the

perusal of Richardson's Treatise.

Vaucanson displayed an uncommon genius for mechanics. His taste was

first determined by an accident: when young, he frequently attended his

mother to the residence of her confessor; and while she wept with

repentance, he wept with weariness! In this state of disagreeable

vacation, says Helvetius, he was struck with the uniform motion of the

pendulum of the clock in the hall. His curiosity was roused; he

approached the clock-case, and studied its mechanism; what he could not

discover he guessed at. He then projected a similar machine; and

gradually his genius produced a clock. Encouraged by this first success,

he proceeded in his various attempts; and the genius, which thus could

form a clock, in time formed a fluting automaton.

Accident determined the taste of Molière for the stage. His grandfather

loved the theatre, and frequently carried him there. The young man lived

in dissipation; the father observing it asked in anger, if his son was

to be made an actor. "Would to God," replied the grandfather, "he were

as good an actor as Monrose." The words struck young Molière, he took a

disgust to his tapestry trade, and it is to this circumstance France

owes her greatest comic writer.

Corneille loved; he made verses for his mistress, became a poet,

composed _Mélite_ and afterwards his other celebrated works. The

discreet Corneille had else remained a lawyer.

We owe the great discovery of Newton to a very trivial accident. When a

student at Cambridge, he had retired during the time of the plague into

the country. As he was reading under an apple-tree, one of the fruit

fell, and struck him a smart blow on the head. When he observed the

smallness of the apple, he was surprised at the force of the stroke.

This led him to consider the accelerating motion of falling bodies; from

whence he deduced the principle of gravity, and laid the foundation of

his philosophy.

Ignatius Loyola was a Spanish gentleman, who was dangerously wounded at

the siege of Pampeluna. Having heated his imagination by reading the

Lives of the Saints during his illness, instead of a romance, he

conceived a strong ambition to be the founder of a religious order;

whence originated the celebrated society of the Jesuits.

Rousseau found his eccentric powers first awakened by the advertisement

of the singular annual subject which the Academy of Dijon proposed for

that year, in which he wrote his celebrated declamation against the arts

and sciences. A circumstance which decided his future literary efforts.

La Fontaine, at the age of twenty-two, had not taken any profession, or

devoted himself to any pursuit. Having accidentally heard some verses of

Malherbe, he felt a sudden impulse, which directed his future life. He

immediately bought a Malherbe, and was so exquisitely delighted with

this poet that, after passing the nights in treasuring his verses in his

memory, he would run in the day-time to the woods, where, concealing

himself, he would recite his verses to the surrounding dryads.

Flamsteed was an astronomer by accident. He was taken from school on

account of his illness, when Sacrobosco's book De Sphæra having been

lent to him, he was so pleased with it that he immediately began a

course of astronomic studies. Pennant's first propensity to natural

history was the pleasure he received from an accidental perusal of

Willoughby's work on birds. The same accident of finding, on the table

of his professor, Reaumur's History of Insects, which he read more than

he attended to the lecture, and, having been refused the loan, gave such

an instant turn to the mind of Bonnet, that he hastened to obtain a

copy; after many difficulties in procuring this costly work, its

possession gave an unalterable direction to his future life. This

naturalist indeed lost the use of his sight by his devotion to the

microscope.

Dr. Franklin attributes the cast of his genius to a similar accident. "I

found a work of De Foe's, entitled an 'Essay on Projects,' from which

perhaps I derived impressions that have since influenced some of the

principal events of my life."

I shall add the incident which occasioned Roger Ascham to write his

_Schoolmaster_, one of the few works among our elder writers, which we

still read with pleasure.

At a dinner given by Sir William Cecil, at his apartments at Windsor, a

number of ingenious men were invited. Secretary Cecil communicated the

news of the morning, that several scholars at Eton had run away on

account of their master's severity, which he condemned as a great error

in the education of youth. Sir William Petre maintained the contrary;

severe in his own temper, he pleaded warmly in defence of hard flogging.

Dr. Wootton, in softer tones, sided with the secretary. Sir John Mason,

adopting no side, bantered both. Mr. Haddon seconded the hard-hearted

Sir William Petre, and adduced, as an evidence, that the best

schoolmaster then in England was the hardest flogger. Then was it that

Roger Ascham indignantly exclaimed, that if such a master had an able

scholar it was owing to the boy's genius, and not the preceptor's rod.

Secretary Cecil and others were pleased with Ascham's notions. Sir

Richard Sackville was silent, but when Ascham after dinner went to the

queen to read one of the orations of Demosthenes, he took him aside, and

frankly told him that, though he had taken no part in the debate, he

would not have been absent from that conversation for a great deal; that

he knew to his cost the truth that Ascham had supported; for it was the

perpetual flogging of such a schoolmaster that had given him an

unconquerable aversion to study. And as he wished to remedy this defect

in his own children, he earnestly exhorted Ascham to write his

observations on so interesting a topic. Such was the circumstance which

produced the admirable treatise of Roger Ascham.

Curiosities of Literature, Vol. 1 · 第 206 / 428 题