THE CHARACTER OF JAMES OTIS BY CHARLES K. EDMUNDS, PH. D.

In viewing Washington as the "Father" of our country, as he

certainly was in a sense which we of to-day are coming more and

more to appreciate, in classing Hamilton and Jefferson as

brothers of Washington in his great work, and in ascribing to

Franklin even a greater share in establishing "The United States

of America" than to any of these three, we are apt to forget

those patriots who did so much to keep alive the spirit of

liberty and justice in our land during the troublesome times

preceding the actual rupture between England and her American

Colonies. While we ascribe great and merited praise to those who

not only helped to lay the foundation but also actually began to

build the superstructure of our nationhood, let us not forget

those who by reason of the slightly earlier day in which they

strove needed even a clearer vision to follow the same plans.

They labored before the day had dawned, and yet they held ever

before them the same high-minded general principles of liberty

and justice which actuated the lives of those who took up their

work after them, when the light of Independence was fast breaking

on our shores. Among these pre-revolutionists there is none

more worthy of remembrance and admiration than James Otis, the

foremost advocate of his time in the Colonies. Very vigorously

he toiled in sowing seed the fruits of which he himself was not

to see, but which under the nurture of other able hands and in

the providence of the God of Nations budded at last into "The

Great Republic." Thus it becomes the purpose of this article to

recall briefly the most striking characteristics of him whose

name must always be intimately associated with the ardent debates

and the troublesome events which foreshadowed the great struggle

between the greatest of colonizing nations and her greatest

Colonies.

The exigency of these times was great; and men of courage and

capacity, wise in council and prompt in action rose to meet it.

They were not men ennobled merely by their appearance on the

stage at the time when great scenes were passing. They took a

part in those scenes with a degree of aptness and energy

proportional to the magnitude of the occasion and throughout

displayed high qualities of character.

Otis's part was played not so much in the revolution itself, as

in the agitations and controversies by which it was heralded and

its way prepared. "Admirably fitted by his popular talents, legal

acquirements, and ardent temperament, to take an active share in

the discussion respecting the comparative rights of the Colonies

and the British Parliament, and in preparing the minds of his

countrymen for the great step of a final separation from England,

and having exhausted, as it were, his mental powers in this

preparatory effort, his mind was darkened when the contest really

came, and he remained an impotent spectator of the struggle, by

which the liberties of his native land were at last permanently

established."

The Life of James Otis as narrated by William Tudor is one of the

most pleasant and instructive in the whole range of American

biographies, and leaves few particulars in the personal life of

Otis to be gathered by the subsequent investigator. The sketch

by Francis Bowen in Jared Sparks' Library of American Biography

furnishes additional and valuable illustrations of the character

and services of Otis, which were secured from the third volume of

Thomas Hutchinson's History of Massachusetts, (first published

after Tudor's Life of Otis appeared), from the copies of papers

in the office of the English Board of Trade relating to the

colonial history of Massachusetts, and from the private

correspondence of Governors Bernard and Hutchinson with the

English Ministry, during the time of Otis's public career. These

sources throw much light on the conduct of Otis as the chief

political opponent of the these two colonial executives.

It is the purpose of the present article merely to emphasize the

three striking traits of his character,--his impetuosity and

earnestness, his high integrity and devotion to truth and

justice, and his marked ability as an advocate before the bar.

In reading the memoirs of James Otis one is struck from first to

last with the impetuosity, the earnestness, the ardent temper of

his nature. This was at once the secret of a great measure of

his power and also the partial source of his mental undoing. As

a student at Harvard, the last two years of his college life were

marked with great assiduity in study, and while at home during

the vacations in this period, he devoted himself so closely to

his books, that he was seldom seen by his friends, and often it

was not known that he had returned, till he had been in his

father's house for some days. Such severe application doubtless

served to sow the first seeds of mental derangement, which

falling on the fertile soil of his feverish disposition and

nutured by the constant and intense argumentative strife of his

later political career, finally found their fruition in the

mental collapse which so distressingly darkened his latter days.

When participating in the common amusements of youth he exhibited

all the vivacity of an excitable temperament.

The earnestness of his nature led him to resign a lucrative

office, renounce the favor of government, abandon the fairest

prospects of professional emolument and distinction, and to

devote himself to the service of his country with unflinching

courage, quenchless zeal, and untiring energy.

As an orator the impetuosity of his speech and the earnestness of

his voice and manner were so impressive, that they forced

conviction upon his hearers even when his arguments did not reach

their judgment. Such was the fluency and animation of his

language, whether written or spoken, that though it was sometimes

coarse and defective in taste, it was always, as will be seen

from the examples quoted in this paper, extremely effective.

In political controversy the impetuosity of his nature led him to

be irascible and harsh towards his opponents and sometimes hasty

in judgment. But towards those whom he liked he was equally

effusive in expressions of regard, and was generous,

high-spirited and placable.

The fiery and impetuous temper of Otis is well illustrated

by the following anecdote given by Tudor, who, however, does not

vouch for its authenticity. Upon first taking his seat in the

house, a friend sitting near, said: "Mr. Otis, you have great

abilities, but are too warm, too impetuous; your opponents,

though they cannot meet you in argument, will get the advantage

by interrupting you, and putting you in a passion." "Well,"

said Otis, "if you see me growing warm, give me a hint, and I'll

command myself." Later on when a question of some importance

arose, Otis and this friend were on the Boston seat together.

Otis said he was going to speak, and his companion again warned

him against being irritated by interruptions from the opposition.

He soon rose, and was speaking with great fluency and powerful

logic, when Timothy Ruggles interrupted him; he grew warm in

reply, and his friend pulled his coat slightly. Otis scowled as

he turned round, but taking the hint moderated his tone. Soon

afterwards, Mr. Choate, of Ipswich, broke in on him again. This

aroused his temper, and his coat was pulled a second time;

turning round quickly he said in an undertone to his monitor,

"Let me alone; do you take me for a schoolboy?" and continuing

his address with great impetuosity he overwhelmed his opponent

with sarcasm and invective.

Without doubt James Otis was a strong man,--a man of strong and

positive character, whose friends and enemies were equally strong

in their feelings of like and dislike. The men who were ranged

as his enemies have for the most part been relegated to a second

place on the page of history (this does not apply to Thomas

Hutchinson, who in his official capacity was Otis's chief

political opponent, but who did not exhibit the personal enemity

of Bernard and others); while those who were his friends stand

out boldly among the notable characters of the past. As Otis

himself remarked concerning Charles Lee, we are not at a loss to

know which is the highest evidence of his virtues--the greatness

and number of his friends, or the malice and envy of his foes.

But friends and foes alike agree in ascribing to him a very

ardent temperament, though with the latter it is unjustly

regarded as violent. There is a great contrast between the

estimate of Otis given by Hutchinson (quoted below) and that

exhibited in the following extract from a long letter written by

Governor Bernard to Lord Shelburne, near the end of the year

1766, which is entirely filled with a review of Otis's career and

character, and is a curious specimen of studied calumniation.

The introductory remarks show sufficiently well the spirit of the

whole. "I would avoid personalities, but in the present case it

is impossible. The troubles in this country take their rise

from, and owe their continuance to, one man, so much, that this

history alone would contain a full account of them. This man,

James Otis, Esq., was a lawyer at Boston when I first came to the

government. He is by nature a passionate, violent, and desperate

man, which qualities sometimes work him up to an absolute

frenzy.--I say nothing of him, which is not known to be his

certain character, confirmed by frequent experience."

While sympathy for Otis made the public commonly ascribe the

alienation of his reason chiefly to the injuries received during

his encounter with Robinson in the British Coffee House, it is

fairly certain that the commencement of the disease dates further

back, and that the blows on the head hastened and aggravated an

already incipient malady superinduced by very different causes.

In the ardor and assiduity of his devotion to the colonial cause

Otis had overtaxed his mental powers. His fine faculties that

had been exerted so strenuously, and with such striking effect,

in the service of his country, were sinking under the excitement

and the effort which had sustained them in the heat of action.

For ten years he had abandoned the ordinary practice of his

profession and renouncing all recreation had given his entire

time and thought, himself, verily, to the "great argument" which

involved the welfare of the Colonies, and as we now see it, of

the world. To allow one idea exclusive occupancy of the mind and

constantly to ponder a single topic, is a very frequent and

almost sure cause of mental distress. It was his highest merit

and at the same time his greatest misfortune, that Otis permitted

this political controversy to have such an absorbing and despotic

command of his attention that melancholy consequences gradually

appeared and left little hope of his final restoration. His

excitable and passionate temperament allowed the fire to be soon

kindled, and nourished the flame in which his intellect, strong

as it had been, was ultimately destroyed.

Otis's mental malady first appeared in a form which was mistaken

for mere eccentricity of humor, and some time elapsed before his

oddities of fancy and conduct deepened into acknowledged

insanity. An incident which might have aroused the suspicions of

his friends occurred during the legislative session of 1769, when

at the close of a powerful and ingenious speech by Brigadier

Ruggles in which he had made a deep impression, Otis at once

arose and in an impassioned tone and manner which struck awe upon

all those present, exclaimed, "Mr. Speaker, the liberty of this

country is gone forever, and I'll go after it;" and turning round

immediately left the House. Some members stared, some laughed,

but none seemed to suspect the true cause of this odd behavior.

How, after the encounter with Robinson, this mental disease made

inroads on his fine powers, we best know from John Adams, who on

September 3, 1769, wrote: "Otis talks all; he grows the most

talkative man alive; no other gentleman in company can find space

to put in a word. He grows narrative like an old man." On

September 5th occurred the encounter with Robinson, one of the

Commissioners of Customs, at the British Coffee House, which

greatly aggravated his mental disorder. From this time on he was

a subject of some perplexity to the Whig leaders, though the

spell with which he influenced the people was long in breaking.

On January 16, Adams again wrote: "Otis is in confusion yet; he

loses himself; he rambles and wanders like a ship without a helm;

attempted to tell a story which took up almost all the evening. *

* * In one word, Otis will spoil the club. He talks so much, and

takes up so much of our time, and fills it with trash,

obsceneness, profaneness, nonsense, and distraction, that we have

none left for rational amusements or inquiries. * * * I fear, I

tremble, I mourn, for the man and for his country; many others

mourn over him with tears in their eyes."

In connection with Otis's charge against Hutchinson as to

rapacious office-seeking the following extract from John

Adams's diary is of curious interest. After detailing certain

detractions of which he had been the victim, the diarist breaks

out testily: "This is the rant of Mr. Otis concerning me. * * *

But be it known to Mr. Otis I have been in the public cause as

long as he, though I was never in the General Court but one year.

I have sacrificed as much to it as he. I have never got my

father chosen Speaker and Counselor by it; my brother-in-law

chosen into the House and chosen Speaker by it; nor a

brother-in-law's brother-in-law into the House and Council by it;

nor did I ever turn about in the House, and rant it on the side

of the prerogative for a whole year, to get a father into a

Probate office first Justice of a Court of Common Pleas, and a

brother into a clerk's office. There is a complication of

malice, envy, and jealousy in this man, in the present disordered

state of his mind, which is quite shocking." (Oct. 27, 1772.)

In this incapacity of Otis, who at last had to seek confinement,

Samuel Adams came to the front of the opposition to Hutchinson as

representing the government policy, and in nothing did he show

more adroitness than in the manner in which he humored and

exploited the colleague, whom, though sick, the people would not

suffer to be withdrawn, as is shown by the following resolution:

James Otis, the Pre-Revolutionist · 第 4 / 38 题