"There is seldom in his Etchings any large arrangement of light and

shade."--_P. G. Hamerton._

"Short, scratchy lines."--_St. James's Gazette._

"The architectural ornaments and the interlacing bars of the gratings

are suggested rather than drawn."

_St. James's Gazette._

"Amateur prodige."--_Saturday Review._

14.--LONG LAGOON.

"We think that London fogs and the muddy old Thames supply Mr.

Whistler's needle with subjects more congenial than do the Venetian

palaces and lagoons."--_Daily News._

15.--TEMPLE.

"The work does not feel much."--_Times._

16.--LITTLE SALUTE.--(DRY-POINT.)

"As for the lucubrations of Mr. Whistler, they come like shadows and

will so depart, _and it is unnecessary to disquiet one's self about

them_."

17.--THE BRIDGE.

"These works have been done with a swiftness and dash that precludes

anything like care and finish."

"These Etchings of Mr. Whistler's are nothing like so satisfactory as

his earlier Chelsea ones; they neither convey the idea of space nor

have they the delicacy of handling and treatment which we see in

those."

"He looked at Venice never in detail."

_F. Wedmore._

18.--WOOL CARDERS.

"They have a merit of their own, and I do not wish to understand

it."[24]--_F. Wedmore._

[Note 24: Mr. Wedmore is the lucky discoverer of the

following:--

"Vigour and exquisiteness are denied--are they

not?--even to a Velasquez"!]

19.--UPRIGHT VENICE.

"Little to recommend them save the eccentricity of their titles."

20.--LITTLE VENICE.

"The Little Venice is one of the slightest of the series."--_St.

James's Gazette._

"In the Little Venice and the Little Lagoon Mr. Whistler has attempted

to convey impressions by lines far too few for his purposes."--_Daily

News._

"Our river is naturally full of effects in _black and white and

bistre_. Venetian skies and marbles have colour you cannot suggest

with a point and some printer's ink."--_Daily News._

"It is not the Venice of a maiden's fancies."--_'Arry._

21.--LITTLE COURT.

"Merely technical triumphs."--_Standard._

22.--REGENT'S QUADRANT.

"There may be a few who find genius in insanity."

23.--LOBSTER POTS.

"So little in them."[25]--_P. G. Hamerton._

[Note 25: The same Critic holds:

"The Thames is beautiful from Maidenhead to Kew, but not

from Battersea to Sheerness."]

24.--RIVA No. 2.

"In all his former Etchings he was careful to give a strong foundation

of firm drawing. In these plates, however, he has cast aside this

painstaking method."

_St. James's Gazette._

25.--ISLANDS.

"An artist who has never mastered the subtleties of accurate

form."[26]--_F. Wedmore._

[Note 26: Elsewhere Mr. Wedmore is inspired to say--

"The true collector must _gradually_ and _painfully_

acquire the eye to judge of the impression."]

[Sidenote: _REFLECTION:_

_This_ is possibly the process through which the

preacher is passing.

[Illustration]]

26.--THE LITTLE LAGOON.

"Well, little new came of it, in etching; nothing new that was

beautiful."--_F. Wedmore._

27.--NOCTURNE SHIPPING.

[Sidenote: "Amazing!"

[Illustration]]

"This Archimago of the iconographic aoraton, or graphiology of the

Hidden."--_Daily Telegraph._

"Popularity is the only insult that has not yet been offered to Mr.

Whistler."--_Oscar Wilde._

28.--TWO DOORWAYS.

"It is trying to any sketch without tone to be hung upon a wall as

these have been."--_P. G. Hamerton._

29.--OLD WOMEN.

"He is never literary."--_P. G. Hamerton._

30.--RIVA.

[Sidenote: _REFLECTION:_

Like Eno's Fruit Salt or the "Anti-mal-de-Mer."

[Illustration]]

"He took from London to Venice his happy fashion of suggesting lapping

water."--_F. Wedmore._

"Even such a well-worn subject as the Riva degli Schiavoni is made

original (?) by being taken from a high point of view, and looked at

lengthwise, instead of from the canal."

31.--DRURY LANE.

"In Mr. Whistler's productions one might safely say that there is no

culture."--_Athenæum._

32.--THE BALCONY.

"His colour is subversive."--_Russian Press._

33.--ALDERNEY STREET.

"The best art may be produced with trouble."

_F. Wedmore._[27]

[Note 27: "I am not a Mede nor a Persian."--F.

WEDMORE.]

34.--THE SMITHY.

"They produce a disappointing impression."

"His Etchings seem weak when framed."[28]

_P. G. Hamerton._

[Note 28: Mr. Hamerton does also say:

"Indifference to beauty is however compatible with

splendid success in etching, as the career of Rembrandt

proved."--_Etching and Etchers._]

35.--STABLES.

"An unpleasing thing, and framed in Mr. Whistler's odd

fashion."--_City Press._

36.--THE MAST.

[Sidenote: _REFLECTION:_

At the service of critics of unequal sizes.

[Illustration]]

"The Mast and the Little Mast are dependent for much of their

interest, on the drawing of festoons of cord hanging from unequal

heights."

_P. G. Hamerton._

37.--TRAGHETTO.

"The artist's present principles seem to deny him any effective

chiaroscuro."--_P. G. Hamerton._

[Sidenote: _REFLECTION:_

"Sometimes generally always."

[Illustration]]

"Mr. Whistler's figure drawings, generally defective and always

incomplete."

38.--FISHING BOAT.

"Subjects unimportant in themselves."

_P. G. Hamerton._

39.--PONTE PIOVAN.

"Want of variety in the handling."

_St. James's Gazette._

40.--GARDEN.

"An art which is happier in the gloom of a doorway than in the glow of

the sunshine, and turns with a pleasant blindness from whatsoever in

Nature or Man is of perfect beauty or noble thought."--_'Arry._

41.--THE RIALTO.

"Mr. Whistler has etched too much for his reputation."--_F. Wedmore._

[Sidenote: _REFLECTION:_

This critic, true, is a Slade Professor.

[Illustration]]

"Scampering caprice."--_S. Colvin._

"Mr. Whistler's drawing, which is sometimes that of a very slovenly

master."

42.--LONG VENICE.

"After all, there are certain accepted canons about what constitutes

good drawing, good colour, and good painting; and when an artist

deliberately sets himself to ignore or violate all of these, it is

desirable that his work should not be classed with that of ordinary

artists."--_'Arry._

43.--NOCTURNE SALUTE.

"The utter absence, as far as my eye[29] may be trusted, of

gradation."--_F. Wedmore._

[Note 29:?

[Illustration]]

"There are many things in a painter's art which even a photographer

cannot understand."

_Laudatory notice in Provincial Press._

44.--FURNACE NOCTURNE.

"There is no moral element in his chiaroscuro."

_Richmond Eagle._

45.--PIAZETTA.

"Whistler does not take much pains with his work."

_New York Paper._

"A sort of transatlantic impudence in his cleverness."

"His pictures do not claim to be accurate."

46.--THE LITTLE MAST.

"Form and line are of little account to him."

47.--QUIET CANAL.

"Herr Whistler stellt ganz wunderbare Productionen aus, die auf

Gesetze der Form und der Farbe gegründet scheinen, die dem

Uneingeweihten unverständlich sind."--_Wiener Presse._

"This new manner of Mr. Whistler's is no improvement upon that which

helped him to win his fame in this field of art."

48.--PALACES.

"The absence, seemingly, of any power of drawing the forms of

water."[30]--_F. Wedmore._

[Note 30: See No. 30, _The Riva_.]

"He has never, so far as we know, attempted to transfer to copper any

of the more ambitious works of the architect."--_Pall Mall Gazette._

"He has been content to show us what his eyes can see, and not what

his hand can do."

_St. James's Gazette._

49.--SALUTE DAWN.

"Too sensational."--_Athenæum._

"Pushing a single artistic principle to the verge of

affectation."--_Sidney Colvin._

50.--BEGGARS.

"In the character of humanity he has not time to be

interested."--_Standard._

"General absence of tone."--_P. G. Hamerton._

51.--LAGOON: NOON.

"Years ago James Whistler was a person of high promise."--_F. Wedmore._

"What the art of Mr. Whistler yields is a tertium quid."[31]--_Sidney

Colvin._

[Note 31: _REFLECTION:_

The quid of sweet and bitter fancy.

[Illustration]]

"All of which gems, I am sincerely thankful to say, I cannot

appreciate."

"As we have hinted, the series does not represent any Venice that we

much care to remember; for who wants to remember the degradation of

what has been noble, the foulness of what has been fair?"

_'Arry[32] in the "Times."_

[Note 32: _REFLECTION:_

The labour of the foolish wearieth every one of them

because he knoweth not how to go to the City.

[Illustration]]

"Disastrous failures."--_F. Wedmore._

"Failures that are complete and failures that are partial."--_F.

Wedmore._

"A publicity rarely bestowed upon failures at all."

_F. Wedmore, Nineteenth Century._

[Sidenote:

_"Voilà ce que l'on dit de moi

Dans la Gazette de Hollande."_]

"Therefore is judgment far from us, neither doth justice overtake

us. We wait for light, but behold obscurity; for brightness, but we

walk in darkness."

"We grope for the wall like the blind, and we grope as if we had no

eyes; we stumble at noonday as in the night."

"We roar all like bears."

[Illustration]

_Taking the Bait_

[Sidenote: _The Academy_, Feb. 24, 1883.]

By the simple process of applying snippets of published sentences to

works of art to which the original comments were never meant to have

reference, and sometimes, too, by lively misquotation--as when a

writer who "did not wish to understate" Mr. Whistler's merit is made

to say he "did not wish to understand" it, Mr. Whistler has counted on

good-humouredly confounding criticism. He has entertained but not

persuaded; and if his literary efforts with the scissors and the

paste-pot might be taken with any seriousness we should have to rebuke

him for his feat. But we are far from doing so. He desired, it seems,

to say that he and Velasquez were both above criticism. An artist in

literature would have said it in fewer words; but indulgence may

fairly be granted to the less assured methods of an amateur in

authorship.

F. WEDMORE.

_An Apology_

[Sidenote: _The World_, Feb. 28, 1883.]

Atlas--There are those, they tell me, who have the approval of the

people--and live! For them the _succès d'estime_; for me, O Atlas, the

_succès d'exécration_--the only tribute possible from the Mob to the

Master! This I have now nobly achieved. _Glissons!_ In the hour of my

triumph let me not neglect my ambulance.

Mr. Frederick Wedmore--a critic--one of the wounded--complains that by

dexterously substituting "understand" for "understate," I have dealt

unfairly by him, and wrongly rendered his writing. Let me hasten to

acknowledge the error, and apologise. My carelessness is culpable, and

the misprint without excuse; for naturally I have all along known, and

the typographer should have been duly warned, that with Mr. Wedmore,

as with his brethren, it is always a matter of understating, and not

at all one of understanding.

_Quant aux autres_--well, with the exception of "'Arry," who

really is dead, they will recover. Scalped and disfigured, they are

not mortally hurt; and--would you believe it?--possessed with an

infinite capacity for continuing, they have already returned, nothing

doubting, to their limited literature, of which I have exhausted the

stock.--Yours, _en passant_,

Chelsea.

[Illustration]

_"Jeux Innocents" in Tite Street_

[Sidenote: _The World_, Dec. 26, 1883.]

Mr. Whistler's final breakfast of the year was given on Sunday last.

The hospitable master has fresh wonders in store for his friends in

the new year; for, not content with treating his next-door critic

after the manner that Portuguese sailors treat the Apostle Judas at

Easter-tide, he is said to have perfected a new instrument of torture.

This invention is of the nature of a camera obscura, whereby, by a

crafty "arrangement" of reflectors, he promises to display in his own

studio, to his friends, "'Arry at the White House," under all the

appropriate circumstances that might be expected of a "Celebrity at

Home."

ATLAS.

_A Line from the Lands End_

[Sidenote: _The World_, Jan. 2, 1884.]

Delightful! Atlas--I have read here, to the idle miners--culture in

their manners curiously, at this season, blended with intoxication--your

brilliant and graphic description of 'Arry at the other end of my

arrangement in telescopic lenses.

The sensitive sons of the Cornish caves, by instinct refined, revel in

the writhing of the resurrected 'Arry.

Our natures are evidently of the same dainty brutality. Cruelty to the

critic after demise, is a revelation, and the story of 'Arry pursued

with post-mortem, and, for Sunday demonstration, kept by galvanism

from his grave, is to them most fascinating.

I have, my sympathetic Atlas, the success that might have been Edgar

Poe's, could he have read to such an audience the horrible "Case of

Mr. Waldemar."

My invention and machinery, by the way, these warm-hearted people

believe to be something after the fashion of their own sluice-boxes--and

I dare not undeceive them.

Atlas, _je te la souhaite bonne et heureuse_!

ST. IVES, CORNWALL,

Dec. 27.

[Illustration]

_The Easy Expert_

Atlas--They have sent me the _Spectator_--a paper upon which our late

'Arry lingered to the last as art critic. In its columns I find a

correspondent calling aloud for our kind intervention. Present me,

brave Atlas, to the editor, that I may say to him:

[Sidenote: _The World_, Jan. 30, 1884.]

"GOOD SIR,--'Your Reviewer' is doubtless my unburied 'Arry. Why, then,

should 'his mistaking a photogravure reproduction of a pen-and-ink

drawing by Samuel Palmer for a finished etching by the same hand'

seem, 'to say the least of it, astounding'?

"Not at all! By this sort of thing was he known among us, poor

chap--and so was he our fresh gladness and continued surprise."

"Did I not make historical his enchanting encounter with Mr.

Herkomer's water-colour drawing of Mr. Ruskin at the Grosvenor, which

he described as the 'first oil portrait we have of the great master'?

Amazing that, if you like!

"Do not all remember how we leaped for joy at the reading of it?"

"Even Atlas himself laughed aloud, and, handicapped as he is with the

World, and weighted with wisdom, danced upon his plinth, a slow

measure of reckless acquiescence, as I set down in the chronicles of

all time that 'Arry, 'unable, by mere sense of smell, to distinguish

between oil and water-colour, might at least have inquired; and that

either the fireman or the guardian in the Gallery could have told him

not to blunder in the _Times_.'"

"But no, he never would ask--he liked his potshots at things; it used

to give a sort of sporting interest to his speculations upon pictures.

And so he was ever obstinate--or any one at the Fine Art Society would

have told him the difference between an etching and a photograph.--I

am, good sir, yours, etc."

Atlas, _à bientôt_.

ST. IVES, CORNWALL,

Jan. 25, 1834.

[Illustration]

_Propositions--No. 2_

A picture is finished when all trace of the means used to bring about

the end has disappeared.

To say of a picture, as is often said in its praise, that it shows

great and earnest labour, is to say that it is incomplete and unfit

for view.

Industry in Art is a necessity--not a virtue--and any evidence of the

same, in the production, is a blemish, not a quality; a proof, not of

achievement, but of absolutely insufficient work, for work alone will

efface the footsteps of work.

The work of the master reeks not of the sweat of the brow--suggests no

effort--and is finished from its beginning.

The completed task of perseverance only, has never been begun, and

will remain unfinished to eternity--a monument of goodwill and

foolishness.

"There is one that laboureth, and taketh pains, and maketh haste, and

is so much the more behind."

The masterpiece should appear as the flower to the

painter--perfect in its bud as in its bloom--with no reason to explain

its presence--no mission to fulfil--a joy to the artist--a delusion to

the philanthropist--a puzzle to the botanist--an accident of sentiment

and alliteration to the literary man.

[Illustration]

_A Hint_

[Sidenote: _The World_, Feb. 17, 1886.]

Please to take note, my dear Mr. James McN. W., that your "dearest

foe," 'Arry, is a candidate for the Slade Chair of Art in the

University of Cambridge! This is said to be the age of testimonials. A

few words from you, my dear James, addressed to the distinguished

trustees, could not fail to give 'Arry a lift.

ATLAS.

_A Distinction_

Atlas, you provoke me! The wisdom of ages means but little--I have

said it. _Faut être "dans le mouvement,"_ you dear old thing, or you

are absolutely out of it!

[Sidenote: _The World_, Feb. 24, 1886.]

You are misled, and mistake mere fact for the fiction of history,

which is truth--and instructs--and is beautiful.

Now, in truth, 'Arry is dead--very dead.

Did I not, from between your shoulders, sally forth and slay

him?--thereby instructing--and making history--and avenging the

beautiful.

If within the distant Aïden, you can't descry, "with sorrow laden,"

the tiny soul of 'Arry, it is because you no longer read your own

small print, my Atlas! and the microbes of Eternity escape you.

Moreover, are not these things written in the chronicles of Chelsea,

adown whose Embankment I still, Achilles-like, do drag the body of an

afternoon?

This practice has doubtless completed the confusion of the

wearied ones of Slade--and they of the Schools, accustomed to the

culture of Colvin, whose polished scalp I with difficulty collected,

ceasing to distinguish between the quick and the dead, will probably

prop up our late 'Arry as professor, long to remain undetected in the

Chair!

Atlas, _tais-toi!_--Let us not interfere!

[Illustration]

_A Document_

Atlas--I have come upon the posthumous paper of 'Arry--his certificate

of character, and printed pretension to the Professorship of

Slade--and O! the shame of it--and the indiscretion of it!

Read, Atlas, and seek in your past for a parallel:

[Sidenote: _The World_, March 24, 1886.]

"To the Electors of the Slade Professor of Fine Art for the University

of Cambridge.--My Lord and Gentlemen,--I beg to submit my name as a

candidate for the Slade Professorship, and enclose herewith a few

testimonials ... I have also received favourable letters from the

following gentlemen ... Alma-Tadema, R.A., Marcus Stone, R.A., Briton

Rivière, R.A., John Brett, A.R.A., ... and others."

What! is the Immaculate impure?--and shall the Academy have coquetted

with the unclean?

Had Alma the classic aught in common with this 'Arry of commerce?

Believe him not, Atlas!

O Alma! O Ichabod! forgive us the thought of it!

Surely also the pots of "the Forty" do boil before the Lord, and the

flames of the chosen were unfanned by the feather of 'Arry's

goose-quill.

Again:

"My experience in art matters has been briefly as follows:

"I have worked at the subject continually in Italy, having for that

purpose travelled and stayed in that country--at least a dozen times.

I have also painted in France, Germany, and Belgium, in which

last-mentioned country I was in a portrait painter's studio."--(A

portrait by 'Arry!)

"There are several pictures of mine being exhibited in London at the

present time." (!!!)

"I have also executed a good deal of distemper....

"I have also travelled for a year in the East." ('Arry in the East!!)

"I have had, as a lecturer upon Art, considerable experience--at

working men's clubs-- ... and at the Rev. Stopford A. Brooke's College

for men, women, and children.

"For the last ten years I have written _every article upon art_ which

has appeared in the _Spectator_ newspaper"--a confession, Atlas,

clearly a confession!

"In 1880, I wrote a critical life of Giotto"--he did indeed,

Atlas!--I saw it--a book in blue--his own, and Reckitt's--all bold

with brazen letters:

"GIOTTO BY 'ARRY"

--"of which two editions were published"--bless him--and then I killed

him!

and, "I am, Gentlemen,

"Your most obedient servant,

"'ARRY, M.A.

"Trin. Coll. Camb., _Esquire_."

The pride of it!

[Illustration]

_Sacrilege_

O Atlas! What of the "Society for the Preservation of Beautiful

Buildings"?

[Sidenote: Upon the Alterations of the "White House."]

Where _is_ Ruskin? and what do Morris and Sir William Drake?

[Sidenote: _The World_, Oct. 17, 1883.]

For, behold! beside the Thames, the work of desecration continues, and

the "White House" swarms with the mason of contract.

The architectural _galbe_ that was the joy of the few, and the

bedazement of "the Board," crumbles beneath the pick, as did the north

side of St. Mark's, and history is wiped from the face of Chelsea.

Shall no one interfere? Shall the interloper, even after his death,

prevail?

Shall 'Arry, whom I have hewn down, still live among us by outrage of

this kind, and impose his memory upon our pavement by the public

perpetration of his posthumous philistinism?

Shall the birthplace of art become the tomb of its parasite in

Tite Street?

See to it, Atlas! lest, when Time, the healer of all the wounds I have

inflicted, shall for me have exacted those honours the prophet may not

expect while alive, and the inevitable blue disc, imbedded in the

walls, shall proclaim that "Here once dwelt" the gentle Master of all

that is flippant and fine in Art, some anxious student, reading, fall

out with Providence in his vain effort to reconcile such joyous

reputation with the dank and hopeless appearance of this "model

lodging," bequeathed to the people by the arrogance of 'Arry.

[Illustration]

_The Red Rag_

[Sidenote: "_Mr. Whistler, Cheyne Walk._"]

[Sidenote: _The World_, May 22, 1878.]

Why should not I call my works "symphonies," "arrangements,"

"harmonies," and "nocturnes"? I know that many good people think my

nomenclature funny and myself "eccentric." Yes, "eccentric" is the

adjective they find for me.

The vast majority of English folk cannot and will not consider a

picture as a picture, apart from any story which it may be supposed to

tell.

My picture of a "Harmony in Grey and Gold" is an illustration of my

meaning--a snow scene with a single black figure and a lighted tavern.

I care nothing for the past, present, or future of the black figure,

placed there because the black was wanted at that spot. All that I

know is that my combination of grey and gold is the basis of the

picture. Now this is precisely what my friends cannot grasp.

They say, "Why not call it 'Trotty Veck,' and sell it for a round

harmony of golden guineas?"--naïvely acknowledging that, without

baptism, there is no ... market!

But even commercially this stocking of your shop with the goods of

another would be indecent--custom alone has made it dignified. Not

even the popularity of Dickens should be invoked to lend an

adventitious aid to art of another kind from his. I should hold it a

vulgar and meretricious trick to excite people about Trotty Veck when,

if they really could care for pictorial art at all, they would know

that the picture should have its own merit, and not depend upon

dramatic, or legendary, or local interest.

As music is the poetry of sound, so is painting the poetry of sight,

and the subject-matter has nothing to do with harmony of sound or of

colour.

The great musicians knew this. Beethoven and the rest wrote

music--simply music; symphony in this key, concerto or sonata in that.

On F or G they constructed celestial harmonies--as harmonies--as

combinations, evolved from the chords of F or G and their minor

correlatives.

This is pure music as distinguished from airs--commonplace and vulgar

in themselves, but interesting from their associations, as, for

instance, "Yankee Doodle," or "Partant pour la Syrie."

Art should be independent of all clap-trap--should stand alone, and

appeal to the artistic sense of eye or ear, without confounding this

with emotions entirely foreign to it, as devotion, pity, love,

patriotism, and the like. All these have no kind of concern with

it; and that is why I insist on calling my works "arrangements" and

"harmonies."

Take the picture of my mother, exhibited at the Royal Academy as an

"Arrangement in Grey and Black." Now that is what it is. To me it is

interesting as a picture of my mother; but what can or ought the

public to care about the identity of the portrait?

The Gentle Art of Making Enemies · 第 4 / 12 段