SECTION III. (3)

Produced by Douglas L. Alley, III, Marcia Brooks, Colin

Bell and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at

http://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images

generously made available by The Internet Archive/Canadian

Libraries)

THE EXPOSITOR'S BIBLE

EDITED BY THE REV.

W. ROBERTSON NICOLL, M.A., LL.D.

_Editor of "The Expositor," etc._

THE EPISTLES OF ST. JOHN

BY

WILLIAM ALEXANDER, D.D.

LONDON

HODDER AND STOUGHTON

27, PATERNOSTER ROW

MDCCCXCVI

THE EXPOSITOR'S BIBLE.

_Crown 8vo, cloth, price 7s. 6d. each vol._

FIRST SERIES, 1887-8.

Colossians.

By A. MACLAREN, D.D.

St. Mark.

By Very Rev. the Dean of Armagh.

Genesis.

By Prof. MARCUS DODS, D.D.

1 Samuel.

By Prof. W. G. BLAIKIE, D.D.

2 Samuel.

By the same Author.

Hebrews.

By Principal T. C. EDWARDS, D.D.

SECOND SERIES, 1888-9

Galatians.

By Prof. G. G. FINDLAY, B.A.

The Pastoral Epistles.

By Rev. A. PLUMMER, D.D.

Isaiah I.--XXXIX.

By Prof. G. A. SMITH, D.D. Vol. I.

The Book of Revelation.

By Prof. W. MILLIGAN, D.D.

1 Corinthians.

By Prof. MARCUS DODS, D.D.

The Epistles of St. John.

By Right Rev. W. ALEXANDER, D.D.

THIRD SERIES, 1889-90.

Judges and Ruth.

By R. A. WATSON, M.A., D.D.

Jeremiah.

By Rev. C. J. BALL, M.A.

Isaiah XL.--LXVI.

By Prof. G. A. SMITH, D.D. Vol. II.

St. Matthew.

By Rev. J. MONRO GIBSON, D.D.

Exodus.

By Very Rev. the Dean of Armagh.

St. Luke.

By Rev. H. BURTON, M.A.

FOURTH SERIES, 1890-1.

Ecclesiastes.

By Rev. SAMUEL COX, D.D.

St. James and St. Jude.

By Rev. A. PLUMMER, D.D.

Proverbs.

By Rev. R. F. HORTON, D.D.

Leviticus.

By Rev. S. H. KELLOGG, D.D.

The Gospel of St. John.

By. Prof. M. DODS, D.D. Vol. I.

The Acts of the Apostles.

By Prof. STOKES, D.D. Vol. I.

FIFTH SERIES, 1891-2.

The Psalms.

By A. MACLAREN, D.D. Vol. I.

1 and 2 Thessalonians.

By JAMES DENNEY, D.D.

The Book of Job.

By R. A. WATSON, M.A., D.D.

Ephesians.

By Prof. G. G. FINDLAY, B.A.

The Gospel of St. John.

By Prof. M. DODS, D.D. Vol. II.

The Acts of the Apostles.

By Prof. STOKES, D.D. Vol. II.

SIXTH SERIES, 1892-3.

1 Kings.

By Very Rev. the Dean of Canterbury.

Philippians.

By Principal RAINY, D.D.

Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther.

By Prof. W. F. ADENEY, M.A.

Joshua.

By Prof. W. G. BLAIKIE, D.D.

The Psalms.

By A. MACLAREN, D.D. Vol. II.

The Epistles of St. Peter.

By Prof. RAWSON LUMBY, D.D.

SEVENTH SERIES, 1893-4.

2 Kings.

By Very Rev. the Dean of Canterbury.

Romans.

By H. C. G. MOULE, M.A., D.D.

The Books of Chronicles.

By Prof. W. H. BENNETT, M.A., B.D.

2 Corinthians.

By JAMES DENNEY, D.D.

Numbers.

By R. A. WATSON, M.A., D.D.

The Psalms.

By A. MACLAREN, D.D. Vol. III.

EIGHTH SERIES 1895-6.

Daniel.

By Ven. Archdeacon FARRAR.

The Book of Jeremiah.

By Prof. W. H. BENNETT, M.A., B.D.

Deuteronomy.

By Prof. ANDREW HARPER, B.D.

The Song of Solomon and

Lamentations.

By Prof. W. F. ADENEY, M.A.

Ezekiel.

By Prof. JOHN SKINNER, M.A.

The Minor Prophets.

By Prof. G. A. SMITH, D.D. Two

Vols.

THE

EPISTLES OF ST. JOHN

_TWENTY-ONE DISCOURSES_

With Greek Text, Comparative Versions, and Notes

Chiefly Exegetical

BY

WILLIAM ALEXANDER

D.D., D.C.L. OXON., HON. LL.D. DUBLIN

BRASENOSE COLLEGE, OXFORD

LORD BISHOP OF DERRY AND RAPHOE

_FOURTH EDITION_

London

HODDER AND STOUGHTON

27, PATERNOSTER ROW

MDCCCXCVI

Hujus scriptis illustratur,

Illustrata solidatur

Unitas Ecclesiæ.

ADAM OF ST. VICTOR

_Seq._ xxxi. (_S. Johannes Evangelista_).

PREFACE.

It is now many years ago since I entered upon a study of the Epistles

of St. John, as serious and prolonged as was consistent with the often

distracting cares of an Irish Bishop. Such fruit as my labours

produced enjoyed the advantage of appearing in the last volume of the

_Speaker's Commentary_ in 1881.

Since that period I have frequently turned again to these

Epistles--subsequent reflection or study not seldom filling in gaps in

my knowledge, or leading me to modify former interpretations. When

invited last year to resume my old work, I therefore embraced

willingly the opportunity which was presented to me.

Let me briefly state the method pursued in this book.

I. The First Part contains four Discourses.

(1) In the first Discourse I have tried to place the reader in the

historical surroundings from which (unless all early Church history is

unreal, a past that never was present) these Epistles emanated.

(2) In the second Discourse I compare the Epistle with the Gospel.

This is the true point of orientation for the commentator. Call the

connection between the two documents what we may; be the Epistle

preface, appendix, moral and devotional commentary, or accompanying

encyclical address to the Churches, which were "the nurslings of

John"; that connection is constant and pervasive. Unless this

principle is firmly grasped, we not only lose a defence and

confirmation of the Gospel, but dissolve the whole consistency of the

Epistle, and leave it floating--the thinnest cloud in the whole

cloudland of mystic idealism.

(3) The third Discourse deals with the polemical element in these

Epistles. Some commentators indeed, like the excellent Henry Hammond,

"spy out Gnostics where there are none." They confuse us with uncouth

names, and conjure up the ghosts of long-forgotten errors until we

seem to hear a theological bedlam, or to see theological scarecrows.

Yet Gnosticism, Doketism, Cerinthianism, certainly sprang from the

teeming soil of Ephesian thought; and without a recognition of this

fact, we shall never understand the Epistle. Undoubtedly, if the

Apostle had addressed himself only to contemporary error, his great

Epistle would have become completely obsolete for us. To subsequent

ages an antiquated polemical treatise is like a fossil scorpion with a

sting of stone. But a divinely taught polemic under transitory forms

of error finds principles as lasting as human nature.

(4) The object of the fourth Discourse is to bring out the image of

St. John's soul--the essentials of the spiritual life to be found in

those precious chapters which still continue to be an element of the

life of the Church.

Such a view, if at all accurate, will enable the reader to contemplate

the whole of the Epistle with the sense of completeness, of remoteness,

and of unity which arises from a general survey apart from particular

difficulties. An ancient legend insisted that St. John exercised

miraculous power in blending again into one the broken pieces of a

precious stone. We may try in an humble way to bring these fragmentary

particles of spiritual gem-dust together, and fuse them into one.

II. The plan pursued in the second part is this. The First Epistle (of

which only I need now speak) is divided into ten sections.

The sections are thus arranged--

(1) The _text_ is given in Greek. In this matter I make no pretence to

original research; and have simply adopted Tischendorf's text, with

occasional amendments from Dr. Scrivener or Prof. Westcott. At one

time I might have been tempted to follow Lachmann; but experience

taught me that he is "audacior quàm limatior," and I held my hand. The

advantage to every studious reader of having the divine original close

by him for comparison is too obvious to need a word more.

With the Greek I have placed in parallel columns the translations most

useful for ordinary readers--the Latin, the English A.V. and R.V. The

Latin text is that of the "Codex Amiatinus," after Tischendorf's

splendid edition of 1854. In this the reader will find the Hieronymian

interpretation as it stood not more than a hundred and twenty years

after the death of St. Jerome, an interpretation more diligent and more

accurate than that which is supplied by the ordinary Vulgate text. The

saint felt "the peril of presuming to judge others where he himself

would be judged by all; of changing the tongue of the old, and carrying

back a world which was growing hoary to the initial essay of infancy."

The Latin is of that form to which ancient Latin Church writers gave the

name of "rusticitas." But it is a happy--I had almost said a

divine--rusticity. In translating from the Hebrew of the Old Testament,

St. Jerome has given a new life, a strange tenderness or awful cadence,

to prophets and psalmists. The voice of the fields is the voice of

Heaven also. The tongue of the people is for once the tongue of God.

This Hebraistic Latin or Latinised Hebrew forms the strongest link in

that mysterious yet most real spell wherewith the Latin of the Church

enthrals the soul of the world. But to return to our immediate subject.

The student can seldom go wrong by more than a hair's breadth when he

has before him three such translations. In the first column stands St.

Jerome's vigorous Latin. The second contains the English A.V., of which

each clause seems to be guarded by the spirits of the holy dead, as well

as by the love of the living Church; and to tell the innovator that he

"does wrong to show it violence, being so majestical." The third column

offers to view the scholarlike--if sometimes just a little pedantic and

provoking--accuracy of the R.V. To this comparison of versions I attach

much significance. Every translation is an additional commentary, every

good translation the best of commentaries.

I have ventured with much hesitation to add upon another column in

each section a translation drawn up by myself for my own private use;

the greater portion of which was made a year or two before the

publication of the R.V. Its right to be here is this, that it affords

the best key to my meaning in any place where the exposition may be

imperfectly expressed.[1]

(2) One or more Discourses are attached to most of the sections. In

these I may have seemed sometimes to have given myself a wide scope,

but I have tried to make a sound and careful exegesis the basis of

each. And I have throughout considered myself bound to draw out some

great leading idea of St. John with conscientious care.

(3) The Discourses (or if there be no Discourse in the section, the

text and versions) are followed by short notes, chiefly exegetical, in

which I have not willingly passed by any real difficulty.

I have not wished to cumber my pages with constant quotations. But in

former years I have read, in some cases with much care, the following

commentators--St. Augustine's _Tractatus_, St. John Chrysostom's

Homilies on the Gospel (full of hints upon the Epistles), Cornelius à

Lapide; of older post-Reformation commentators, the excellent Henry

Hammond, the eloquent Dean Hardy, the precious fragments in Pole's

_Synopsis_--above all, the inimitable Bengel; of moderns, Düsterdieck,

Huther, Ebrard, Neander; more recently, Professor Westcott, whose

subtle and exquisite scholarship deserves the gratitude of every

student of St. John. Of Haupt I know nothing, with the exception of an

analysis of the Epistle, which is stamped with the highest praise of

so refined and competent a judge as Archdeacon Farrar. But having read

this list fairly in past years, I am now content to have before me

nothing but a Greek Testament, the Grammars of Winer and Donaldson,

the New Testament lexicons of Bretschneider, Grimm, and Mintert, with

Tromm's "Concordantia LXX." For, on the whole, I really prefer St.

John to his commentators. And I hope I am not ungrateful for help

which I have received from them, when I say that I now seem to myself

to understand him better without the dissonance of their many voices.

"Johannem nisi ex Johanne ipso non intellexeris."

III. It only remains to commend this book, such as it is, not only to

theological students, but to general readers, who I hope will not be

alarmed by a few Greek words here and there.

I began my fuller study of St. John's Epistle in the noonday of life;

I am closing it with the sunset in my eyes. I pray God to sanctify

this poor attempt to the edification of souls, and the good of the

Church. And I ask all who may find it useful, to offer their

intercessions for a blessing upon the book, and upon its author.

WILLIAM DERRY AND RAPHOE.

THE PALACE, LONDONDERRY,

_February 6th, 1889_.

MERCIFUL GOD, we beseech Thee to cast Thy bright beams of light upon

Thy Church, that it being enlightened by the doctrine of Thy blessed

Apostle and Evangelist St. John, may so walk in the light of Thy

truth, that it may at length attain to the light of everlasting life,

through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

FOOTNOTE:

[1] I venture to call attention to the rendering "very." It enables

the translator to mark the important distinction between two words:

αληθης, _factually_ true and real, as opposed to that which in point

of fact is mendacious; αληθινος, _ideally_ true and real, that which

alone realizes the idea imperfectly expressed by something else. This

is one of St. John's favourite words. In regard to αγαπη I have not

had the courage of my convictions. The word "charity" seems to me

almost providentially preserved for the rendering of that term. It is

not without a purpose that ερως is so rigorously excluded from the New

Testament. [So also from the Epp. of Ignatius.] The objection that

"charity" conveys to ordinary English people the notion of mere

material alms is of little weight. If "charity" is sometimes a little

_metallic_, is not "love" sometimes a little _maundering_? I agree

with Canon Evans that the word, strictly speaking, should be always

translated "charity" when alone, "love" when in regimen. Yet I have

not been bold enough to put "God is charity" for "God is love."

CONTENTS.

PAGE

PREFACE v

_PART I_.

DISCOURSE I.

THE SURROUNDINGS OF THE FIRST EPISTLE OF ST. JOHN 3

DISCOURSE II.

THE CONNECTION OF THE EPISTLE WITH THE GOSPEL OF

ST. JOHN 21

DISCOURSE III.

THE POLEMICAL ELEMENT IN THE FIRST EPISTLE OF

ST. JOHN 39

DISCOURSE IV.

THE IMAGE OF ST. JOHN'S SOUL IN HIS EPISTLE 54

PART II.

SOME GENERAL RULES FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF THE

FIRST EPISTLE OF ST. JOHN 75

SECTION I.

TEXT AND VERSIONS 79

DISCOURSE I.

ANALYSIS AND THEORY OF ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL 80

DISCOURSE II.

ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL HISTORICAL NOT IDEOLOGICAL 88

SECTION II.

TEXT AND VERSIONS 100

DISCOURSE III.

EXTENT OF THE ATONEMENT 102

DISCOURSE IV.

MISSIONARY APPLICATION OF THE EXTENT OF THE

ATONEMENT 106

SECTION III. (1)

TEXT AND VERSIONS 117

DISCOURSE V.

THE INFLUENCE OF THE GREAT LIFE WALK A PERSONAL

INFLUENCE 118

SECTION III. (2)

TEXT AND VERSIONS 133

SECTION III. (3)

TEXT AND VERSIONS 134

DISCOURSE VI.

THE WORLD WHICH WE MUST NOT LOVE 136

DISCOURSE VII.

USE AND ABUSE OF THE SENSE OF THE VANITY OF THE

WORLD 149

SECTION IV.

TEXT AND VERSIONS 164

DISCOURSE VIII.

KNOWING ALL THINGS 166

SECTION V.

TEXT AND VERSIONS 179

SECTION VI.

TEXTS AND VERSIONS 185

DISCOURSE IX.

LOFTY IDEALS PERILOUS UNLESS APPLIED 188

SECTION VII.

TEXT AND VERSIONS 204

SECTION VIII.

TEXT AND VERSIONS 207

DISCOURSE X.

BOLDNESS IN THE DAY OF JUDGMENT 210

SECTION IX.

TEXT AND VERSIONS 220

DISCOURSE XI.

BIRTH AND VICTORY 223

DISCOURSE XII.

THE GOSPEL AS A GOSPEL OF WITNESS; THE THREE

WITNESSES 236

DISCOURSE XIII.

THE WITNESS OF MEN (APPLIED TO THE RESURRECTION) 241

DISCOURSE XIV.

SIN UNTO DEATH 254

DISCOURSE XV.

THE TERRIBLE TRUISM WHICH HAS NO EXCEPTION 260

SECTION X.

TEXT AND VERSIONS 274

_SECOND EPISTLE_.

TEXT AND VERSIONS 279

DISCOURSE XVI.

THEOLOGY AND LIFE IN KYRIA'S LETTER 282

_THIRD EPISTLE_.

TEXT AND VERSIONS 297

DISCOURSE XVII.

THE QUIETNESS OF TRUE RELIGION 300

PART I.

"JOHANNIS EPISTOLÆ, ULTIMUSQUE PRIMÆ VERSICULUS, IN EPHESUM IMPRIMIS

CONVENIUNT."

(BENGEL _in Act._ xix. 21.)

DISCOURSE I.

_THE SURROUNDINGS OF THE FIRST EPISTLE OF ST. JOHN._

"Little children, keep yourselves from idols."--I JOHN V. 21.

After the example of a writer of genius, preachers and essayists for the

last forty years have constantly applied--or misapplied--some lines from

one of the greatest of Christian poems. Dante sings of St. John--

"As he, who looks intent,

And strives with searching ken, how he may see

The sun in his eclipse, and, through decline

Of seeing, loseth power of sight: so I

Gazed on that last resplendence."[2]

The poet meant to be understood of the Apostle's spiritual splendour of

soul, of the absorption of his intellect and heart in his conception of

the Person of Christ and of the dogma of the Holy Trinity. By these

expositors of Dante the image is transferred to the style and structure

of his writings. But confusion of thought is not magnificence, and mere

obscurity is never sunlike. A blurred sphere and undecided outline is

not characteristic of the sun even in eclipse. Dante never intended us

to understand that St. John as a writer was distinguished by a

beautiful vagueness of sentiment, by bright but tremulously drawn lines

of dogmatic creed. It is indeed certain that round St. John himself, at

the time when he wrote, there were many minds affected by this vague

mysticism. For them, beyond the scanty region of the known, there was a

world of darkness whose shadows they desired to penetrate. For them this

little island of life was surrounded by waters into whose depths they

affected to gaze. They were drawn by a mystic attraction to things which

they themselves called the "shadows," the "depths," the "silences." But

for St. John these shadows were a negation of the message which he

delivered that "God is light, and darkness in Him is none." These

silences were the contradiction of the Word who has once for all

interpreted God. These depths were "depths of Satan."[3] For the men who

were thus enamoured of indefiniteness, of shifting sentiments and

flexible creeds, were Gnostic heretics. Now St. John's style, as such,

has not the artful variety, the perfect balance in the masses of

composition, the finished logical cohesion of the Greek classical

writers. Yet it can be loftily or pathetically impressive. It can touch

the problems and processes of the moral and spiritual world with a

pencil-tip of deathless light, or compress them into symbols which are

solemnly or awfully picturesque.[4] Above all St. John has the faculty

of enshrining dogma in forms of statement which are firm and

precise--accurate enough to be envied by philosophers, subtle enough to

defy the passage of heresy through their finely drawn yet powerful

lines. Thus in the beginning of his Gospel all false thought upon the

Person of Him who is the living theology of His Church is refuted by

anticipation--that which in itself or in its certain consequences

unhumanises or undeifies the God Man; that which denies the singularity

of the One Person who was Incarnate, or the reality and entireness of

the Manhood of Him who fixed His Tabernacle[5] of humanity in us.[6]

It is therefore a mistake to look upon the First Epistle of St. John

as a creedless composite of miscellaneous sweetnesses, a disconnected

rhapsody upon philanthropy. And it will be well to enter upon a

serious perusal of it, with a conviction that it did not drop from the

sky upon an unknown place, at an unknown time, with an unknown

purpose. We can arrive at some definite conclusions as to the

circumstances from which it arose, and the sphere in which it was

written--at least if we are entitled to say that we have done so in

the case of almost any other ancient document of the same nature.

Our simplest plan will be, in the first instance, to trace in the

briefest outline the career of St. John after the Ascension of our Lord,

so far as it can be followed certainly by Scripture, or with the highest

probability from early Church history. We shall then be better able to

estimate the degree in which the Epistle fits into the framework of

local thought and circumstances in which we desire to place it.

Much of this biography can best be drawn out by tracing the contrast

between St. John and St. Peter, which is conveyed with such subtle and

exquisite beauty in the closing chapter of the fourth Gospel.

The contrast between the two Apostles is one of _history_ and of

_character_.

_Historically_ the work done by each of them for the Church differs in

a remarkable way from the other.

We might have anticipated for one so dear to our Lord a distinguished

part in spreading the Gospel among the nations of the world. The tone

of thought revealed in parts of his Gospel might even have seemed to

indicate a remarkable aptitude for such a task. St. John's peculiar

appreciation of the visit of the Greeks to Jesus, and his preservation

of words which show such deep insight into Greek religious ideas,

would apparently promise a great missionary, at least to men of lofty

speculative thought.[7] But in the Acts of the Apostles St. John is

first overshadowed, then effaced, by the heroes of the missionary

epic, St. Peter and St. Paul. After the close of the Gospels he is

mentioned five times only. Once his name occurs in a list of the

Apostles.[8] Thrice he passes before us with Peter.[9] Once again (the

first and last time when we hear of St. John in personal relation with

St. Paul) he appears in the Epistle to the Galatians with two others,

James and Cephas, as reputed to be pillars of the Church.[10] But

whilst we read in the Acts of his taking a certain part in miracles,

in preaching, in confirmation; while his boldness is acknowledged by

adversaries of the faith; not a line of his individual teaching is

recorded. He walks in silence by the side of the Apostle who was more

fitted to be a missionary pioneer.[11]

With the materials at our command, it is difficult to say how St. John

was employed whilst the first great advance of the cross was in

progress. We know for certain that he was at Jerusalem during the

second visit of St. Paul. But there is no reason for conjecturing that

he was in that city when it was visited by St. Paul on his last

voyage[12] (A.D. 60); while we shall presently have occasion to show

how markedly the Church tradition connects St. John with Ephesus.

We have next to point out that this contrast in the _history_ of the

Apostles is the result of a contrast in their _characters_. This

contrast is brought out with a marvellous prophetic symbolism in the

miraculous draught of fishes after the Resurrection.

First as regards St. Peter.

"When Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he girt his fisher's

coat unto him (for he was naked), and did cast himself into the

sea."[13] His was the warm energy, the forward impulse of young life,

the free bold plunge of an impetuous and chivalrous nature into the

waters which are nations and peoples. _In_ he _must_; _on_ he _will_.

The prophecy which follows the thrice renewed restitution of the

fallen Apostle is as follows: "Verily, verily, I say unto thee, When

thou wast young, thou girdest thyself, and walkedst whither thou

wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy

hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou

wouldest not. This spake He, signifying by what death He should

glorify God, and when He had spoken this, He saith unto him, Follow

Me."[14] This, we are told, is obscure; but it is obscure only as to

details. To St. Peter it could have conveyed no other impression than

that it foretold his martyrdom. "When thou wast young," points to the

tract of years up to old age. It has been said that forty is the old

age of youth, fifty the youth of old age. But our Lord does not

actually define old age by any precise date. He takes what has

occurred as a type of Peter's youthfulness of heart and

frame--"girding himself," with rapid action, as he had done shortly

before; "walking," as he had walked on the white beach of the lake in

the early dawn; "whither thou wouldest," as when he had cried with

impetuous half defiant independence, "I go a fishing," invited by the

auguries of the morning, and of the water. The form of expression

seems to indicate that Simon Peter was not to go far into the dark and

frozen land; that he was to be growing old, rather than absolutely

old.[15] Then should he stretch forth his hands, with the dignified

resignation of one who yields manfully to that from which nature would

willingly escape. "This spake He," adds the evangelist, "signifying by

what death he shall glorify God."[16] What fatal temptation leads so

many commentators to minimise such a prediction as this? If the

prophecy were the product of a later hand added after the martyrdom of

St. Peter, it certainly would have wanted its present inimitable

impress of distance and reserve.

It is in the context of this passage that we read most fully and truly

the contrast of our Apostle's nature with that of St. Peter. St. John,

as Chrysostom has told us in deathless words, was loftier, saw more

deeply, pierced right into and through spiritual truths,[17] was more

the lover of Jesus than of Christ, as Peter was more the lover of

Christ than of Jesus. Below the different work of the two men, and

determining it, was this essential difference of nature, which they

carried with them into the region of grace. St. John was not so much

the great missionary with his sacred restlessness; not so much the

oratorical expositor of prophecy with his pointed proofs of

correspondence between prediction and fulfilment, and his passionate

declamation driving in the conviction of guilt like a sting that

pricked the conscience. He was the theologian; the quiet master of the

secrets of the spiritual life; the calm strong controversialist who

excludes error by constructing truth. The work of such a spirit as his

was rather like the finest product of venerable and long established

Churches. One gentle word of Jesus sums up the biography of long years

which apparently were without the crowded vicissitudes to which other

Apostles were exposed. If the old Church history is true, St. John was

either not called upon to die for Jesus, or escaped from that death by

a miracle. That one word of the Lord was to become a sort of motto of

St. John. It occurs some twenty-six times in the brief pages of these

Epistles. "If I will that he abide"--abide in the bark, in the Church,

in one spot, in life, in spiritual communion with Me. It is to be

remembered finally, that not only spiritual, but ecclesiastical

consolidation is attributed to St. John by the voice of history. He

occupied himself with the visitation of his Churches and the

development of Episcopacy.[18] So in the sunset of the Apostolic age

stands before us the mitred form of John the Divine. Early

Christianity had three successive capitals--Jerusalem, Antioch,

Ephesus. Surely, so long as St. John lived, men looked for a Primate

of Christendom not at Rome but at Ephesus.

How different were the two deaths! It was as if in His words our Lord

allowed His two Apostles to look into a magic glass, wherein one saw

dimly the hurrying feet, the prelude to execution which even the saint

wills not; the other the calm life, the gathered disciples, the quiet

sinking to rest. In the clear obscure of that prophecy we may discern

the outline of Peter's cross, the bowed figure of the saintly old man.

Let us be thankful that John "_tarried_." He has left the Church three

pictures that can never fade--in the Gospel the picture of Christ, in

the Epistles the picture of his own soul, in the Apocalypse the

picture of Heaven.

So far we have relied almost exclusively upon indications supplied by

Scripture. We now turn to Church history to fill in some particulars

of interest.

Ancient tradition unhesitatingly believed that the latter years of St.

John's prolonged life, were spent in the city of Ephesus, or province

of Asia Minor, with the Virgin-Mother, the sacred legacy from the

cross, under his fostering care for a longer or shorter portion of

those years. Manifestly he would not have gone to Ephesus during the

lifetime of St. Paul. Various circumstances point to the period of his

abode there as beginning a little after the fall of Jerusalem (A.D.

67). He lived on until towards the close of the first century of the

Christian era, possibly two years later (A.D. 102). With the date of

the Apocalypse we are not directly concerned, though we refer it to a

very late period in St. John's career, believing that the Apostle did

not return from Patmos until just after Domitian's death. The date of

the Gospel may be placed between A.D. 80 and 90. And the First Epistle

accompanied the Gospel, as we shall see in a subsequent discourse.

The Epistle then, like the Gospel, and contemporaneously with it, saw

the light in Ephesus, or in its vicinity. This is proved by three

pieces of evidence of the most unquestionable solidity.

(1) The opening chapters of the Apocalypse contain an argument, which

cannot be explained away, for the connection of St. John with Asia

Minor and with Ephesus. And the argument is independent of the

authorship of that wonderful book. _Whoever_ wrote the Book of the

Revelation must have felt the most absolute conviction of St. John's

abode in Ephesus and temporary exile to Patmos. To have written with a

special view of acquiring a hold upon the Churches of Asia Minor,

while assuming from the very first as _fact_ what _they_, more than

any other Churches in the world, must have known to be _fiction_,

would have been to invite immediate and contemptuous rejection. The

three earliest chapters of the Revelation are unintelligible, except

as the real or assumed utterance of a Primate (in later language) of

the Churches of Asia Minor. To the inhabitants of the barren and

remote isle of Patmos, Rome and Ephesus almost represented the world;

their rocky nest among the waters was scarcely visited except as a

brief resting-place for those who sailed from one of those great

cities to the other, or for occasional traders from Corinth.

(2) The second evidence is the fragment of the Epistle of Irenæus to

Florinus preserved in the fifth book of the Ecclesiastical History of

Eusebius. Irenæus mentions no dim tradition, appeals to no past which

was never present. He has but to question his own recollections of

Polycarp, whom he remembered in early life. "Where he sat to talk, his

way, his manner of life, his personal appearance, how he used to tell

of his intimacy with John, and with the others who had seen the

Lord."[19] Irenæus elsewhere distinctly says that "John himself issued

the Gospel while living at Ephesus in Asia Minor, and that he survived

in that city until Trajan's time."[20]

(3) The third great historical evidence which connects St. John with

Ephesus is that of Polycrates, Bishop of Ephesus, who wrote a synodical

epistle to Victor and the Roman Church on the quartodeciman question,

toward the close of the second century. Polycrates speaks of the great

ashes which sleep in Asia Minor until the Advent of the Lord, when He

shall raise up His saints. He proceeds to mention Philip who sleeps in

Hierapolis; two of his daughters; a third who takes her rest in Ephesus,

and "John moreover, who leaned upon the breast of Jesus, who was a high

priest bearing the radiant plate of gold upon his forehead."[21]

This threefold evidence would seem to render the sojourn of St. John

at Ephesus for many years one of the most solidly attested facts of

earlier Church history.

* * * * *

It will be necessary for our purpose to sketch the general condition

of Ephesus in St. John's time.

A traveller coming from Antioch of Pisidia (as St. Paul did A.D. 54)

descended from the mountain chain which separates the Meander from the

Cayster. He passed down by a narrow ravine to the "Asian meadow"

celebrated by Homer. There, rising from the valley, partly running up

the slope of Mount Coressus, and again higher along the shoulder of

Mount Prion, the traveller saw the great city of Ephesus towering upon

the hills, with widely scattered suburbs. In the first century the

population was immense, and included a strange mixture of races and

religions. Large numbers of Jews were settled there, and seem to have

possessed a full religious organisation under a High Priest or Chief

Rabbi. But the prevailing superstition was the worship of the

Ephesian Artemis. The great temple, the priesthood whose chief seems

to have enjoyed a royal or quasi-royal rank, the affluence of pilgrims

at certain seasons of the year, the industries connected with objects

of devotion, supported a swarm of devotees, whose fanaticism was

intensified by their material interest in a vast religious

establishment. Ephesus boasted of being a theocratic city, the

possessor and keeper of a temple glorified by art as well as by

devotion. It had a civic calendar marked by a round of splendid

festivities associated with the cultus of the goddess. Yet the moral

reputation of the city stood at the lowest point, even in the

estimation of Greeks. The Greek character was effeminated in Ionia by

Asiatic manners, and Ephesus was the most dissolute city of Ionia. Its

once superb schools of art became infected by the ostentatious

vulgarity of an ever-increasing parvenu opulence. The place was

chiefly divided between dissipation and a degrading form of

literature. Dancing and music were heard day and night; a protracted

revel was visible in the streets. Lascivious romances whose infamy was

proverbial were largely sold and passed from hand to hand. Yet there

were not a few of a different character. In that divine climate, the

very lassitude, which was the reaction from excessive amusement and

perpetual sunshine, disposed many minds to seek for refuge in the

shadows of a visionary world. Some who had received or inherited

Christianity from Aquila and Priscilla, or from St. Paul himself,

thirty or forty years before, had contaminated the purity of the faith

with inferior elements derived from the contagion of local heresy, or

from the infiltration of pagan thought. The Ionian intellect seems to

have delighted in imaginative metaphysics; and for minds

undisciplined by true logic or the training of severe science

imaginative metaphysics is a dangerous form of mental recreation. The

adept becomes the slave of his own formulæ, and drifts into partial

insanity by a process which seems to himself to be one of indisputable

reasoning. Other influences outside Christianity ran in the same

direction. Amulets were bought by trembling believers. Astrological

calculations were received with the irresistible fascination of

terror. Systems of magic, incantations, forms of exorcism, traditions

of theosophy, communications with demons--all that we should now sum

up under the head of spiritualism--laid their spell upon thousands. No

Christian reader of the nineteenth chapter of the Acts of the Apostles

will be inclined to doubt that beneath all this mass of superstition

and imposture there lay some dark reality of evil power. At all events

the extent of these practices, these "curious arts" in Ephesus at the

time of St. Paul's visit, is clearly proved by the extent of the local

literature which spiritualism put forth. The value of the books of

magic which were burned by penitents of this class, is estimated by

St. Luke at fifty thousand pieces of silver--probably about thirteen

hundred and fifty pounds of our money![22]

Let us now consider what ideas or allusions in the Epistles of St.

John coincide with, and fit into, this Ephesian contexture of life and

thought.

We shall have occasion in the third discourse to refer to forms of

Christian heresy or of semi-Christian speculation indisputably

pointed to by St. John, and prevalent in Asia Minor when the Apostle

wrote. But besides this, several other points of contact with Ephesus

can be detected in the Epistles before us. (1) The first Epistle

closes with a sharp decisive warning, expressed in a form which could

only have been employed when those who were addressed habitually lived

in an atmosphere saturated with idolatry, where the social temptations

to come to terms with idolatrous practices were powerful and

ubiquitous. This was no doubt true of many other places at the time,

but it was pre-eminently true of Ephesus. Certain of the Gnostic

Christian sects in Ionia held lax views about "eating things

sacrificed unto idols," although fornication was a general

accompaniment of such a compliance. Two of the angels of the Seven

Churches of Asia within the Ephesian group--the angels of Pergamum and

of Thyatira--receive especial admonition from the Lord upon this

subject. These considerations prove that the command, "Children, guard

yourselves from the idols," had a very special suitability to the

conditions of life in Ephesus. (2) The population of Ephesus was of a

very composite kind. Many were attracted to the capital of Ionia by

its reputation as the capital of the pleasures of the world. It was

also the centre of an enormous trade by land and sea. Ephesus,

Alexandria, Antioch and Corinth were the four cities where at that

period all races and all religions of civilised men were most largely

represented. Now the First Epistle of St. John has a peculiar breadth

in its representation of the purposes of God. Christ is not merely the

fulfilment of the hopes of one particular people. The Church is not

merely destined to be the home of a handful of spiritual citizens. The

Atonement is as wide as the race of man. "He is the propitiation for

the whole world;" "we have seen, and bear witness that the Father sent

the Son as Saviour of the world."[23] A cosmopolitan population is

addressed in a cosmopolitan epistle. (3) We have seen that the gaiety

and sunshine of Ephesus was sometimes darkened by the shadows of a

world of magic, that for some natures Ionia was a land haunted by

spiritual terrors. He must be a hasty student who fails to connect the

extraordinary narrative in the nineteenth chapter of the Acts with the

ample and awful recognition in the Epistle to the Ephesians of the

mysterious conflict in the Christian life against evil intelligences,

real, though unseen.[24] The brilliant rationalist may dispose of such

things by the convenient and compendious method of a sneer. "Such

narratives as that" (of St. Paul's struggle with the exorcists at

Ephesus) "are disagreeable little spots in everything that is done by

the people. Though we cannot do a thousandth part of what St. Paul

did, we have a system of physiology and of medicine very superior to

his."[25] Perhaps _he_ had a system of spiritual diagnosis very

superior to ours. In the epistle to the Angel of the Church of

Thyatira, mention is made of "the woman Jezebel, which calleth herself

a prophetess,"[26] who led astray the servants of Christ. St. John

surely addresses himself to a community where influences precisely of

this kind exist, and are recognised when he writes,--"Beloved,

believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of

God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.... Every

spirit that confesseth not Jesus is not of God."[27] The Church or

Churches, which the First Epistle directly contemplates, did not

consist of men just converted. Its whole language supposes Christians,

some of whom had grown old and were "fathers" in the faith, while

others who were younger enjoyed the privilege of having been born and

brought up in a Christian atmosphere. They are reminded again and

again, with a reiteration which would be unaccountable if it had no

special significance, that the commandment "that which they heard,"

"the word," "the message," is the same which they "had from the

_beginning_."[28] Now this will exactly suit the circumstances of a

Church like the Ephesian, to which another Apostle had originally

preached the Gospel many years before.[29]

On the whole, we have in favour of assigning these Epistles to Ionian

and Ephesian surroundings a considerable amount of external evidence.

The general characteristics of the First Epistle consonant with the

view of their origin which we have advocated are briefly these. (1) It

is addressed to readers who were encompassed by peculiar temptations

to make a compromise with idolatry. (2) It has an amplitude and

generality of tone which befitted one who wrote to a Church which

embraced members from many countries, and was thus in contact with men

of many races and religions. (3) It has a peculiar solemnity of

reference to the invisible world of spiritual evil and to its terrible

influence upon the human mind. (4) The Epistle is pervaded by a desire

to have it recognised that the creed and law of practice which it

asserts is absolutely one with that which had been proclaimed by

earlier heralds of the cross to the same community. Every one of these

characteristics is consistent with the destination of the Epistle for

the Christians of Ephesus in the first instance. Its polemical

element, which we are presently to discuss, adds to an accumulation

of coincidences which no ingenuity can volatilise away. The Epistle

meets Ephesian circumstances; it also strikes at Ionian heresies.

Aïa-so-Louk,[30] the modern name of Ephesus, appears to be derived

from two Greek words which speak of St. John the divine, the

theologian of the Church. As the memory of the Apostle haunts the city

where he so long lived, even in its fall and long decay under its

Turkish conquerors,--and the fatal spread of the malaria from the

marshes of the Cayster--so a memory of the place seems to rest in turn

upon the Epistle, and we read it more satisfactorily while we assign

to it the origin attributed to it by Christian antiquity, and keep

that memory before our minds.

FOOTNOTES:

[2] Cary's _Dante_, _Paradiso_, xxv. 117. Stanley's _Sermons and

Essays on the Apostolic Age_, 242.

[3] Apoc. ii. 24.

[4] John xiii. 30 cf. 1 John ii, 11.

[5] εσκηνωσεν εν ἡμιν.

[6] This characteristic of St. John's style is powerfully expressed by

the great hymn-writer of the Latin Church.

"Hebet sensus exors styli;

Stylo scribit tam subtili,

Fide tam catholicâ,

Ne de Verbo salutari

Posset quicquam refragari

Pravitas hæretica."

_Adam of St. Victor, Seq._ xxxii.

[7] John xii. 20-34, especially ver. 24.

[8] Acts i. 13.

[9] Acts iii. 4, v. 13, viii. 14.

[10] Gal. ii. 9.

[11] Acts iii. 4, iv. 13, viii. 14. The singular and interesting

manuscript of Patmos (Αι περιοδοι του θεολογου) attributed to St.

John's disciple, Prochorus, seems to recognise that St. John's chief

mission was not that of working miracles. Even in a kind of duel of

prodigies between him and the sinister magician of Patmos, the

following occurs. "Kynops asked a young man in the multitude where his

father then was. 'My father is dead,' he replied, 'he went down yonder

in a storm.' Turning to John, the magician said,--'Now then, bring up

this young man's father from the dead.' 'I have not come here,'

answered the Apostle, 'to raise the dead, but to deliver the living

from their errors.'"

[12] Gal. ii. 9; Acts xxi. 17, _sqq._

[13] John xxi. 7.

[14] Ibid., vers. 17, 18, 19.

[15] The beginning of old age would account sufficiently for the

anticipation of death in 2 Peter i. 13, 14, 15.

[16] δοξασει ver. 19. The lifelike _shall_ (not _should_) is part of

the many minute but vivid touches which make the whole of this scene

so full of motion and reality--"I go a fishing" (ver. 3); "_about_ two

hundred cubits" (ver. 8); the accurate αιγιαλος (ver. 4. See Trench,

_On Parables_, 57; Stanley, _Apostolic Age_, 135).

[17] διορατικωτερος. S. Joann. Chrysost.--_Hom. in Joann._

[18] _Euseb. H. E._, iii. 23. See other quotations in Bilson,

_Government of Christ's Church_, p. 365.

[19] _Ap. Euseb. H. E._, v. 20.

[20] _Adv. Hæres._, lib. iii., ch. 1.

[21] ἱερευς το πεταλον πεφορεκως--"Pontifex ejus (sc. _Domini_) auream

laminam in fronte habens." So translated by S. Hieron. _Lib. de Vir.

Illust._, xlv. The πεταλον is the LXX. rendering of צִיץ, the

projecting leaf or plate of radiant gold (Exod. xxviii. 26, xxxix.

30), associated with the "mitre" (Lev. viii. 9). Whether Polycrates

speaks literally, or wishes to convey by a metaphor the impression of

holiness radiating from St. John's face, we probably cannot decide.

[22] Acts xix. 20, 21. In this description of Ephesus the writer has

constantly had in view the passages to which he referred in the

_Speakers Commentary, N.T._, iv., 274, 276. He has also studied M.

Renan's _Saint Paul_, chap, xii., and the authorities cited in the

notes, pp. 329, 350.

[23] St. John ii. 2, iv. 14.

[24] "We wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against," etc. Eph.

vi. 12-17.

[25] _Saint Paul_, Renan, 318, 319.

[26] For the almost certain reference here to the Chaldean Sybil

Sambethe, see Apoc ii. 20, Archdeacon Lee's note in _Speaker's

Commentary, N.T._, iv. 527, 534, 535, and Dean Blakesley (art.

_Thyatira, Dict. of the Bible_).

[27] 1 John iv. 1, 3.

[28] 1 John ii. 7, ii. 24, iii. 11; 2 John vv. 5, 6. The passage in

ii. 24 is a specimen of that simple emphasis, that presentation of a

truth or duty under two aspects, which St. John often produces merely

by an inversion of the order of the words. "Ye--what ye _heard_ from

the beginning let it abide in you. If what from the _beginning_ ye

heard abide in you" (ὁ ηκουσατε απ' αρχης ... ὁ απ' αρχης ηκουσατε).

The emphasis in the first clause is upon the _fact_ of their having

_heard_ the message; in the second upon this feature of the

message--that it was given in the _beginning_ of Christianity amongst

them, and kept unchanged until the present time. Cf. εντολη παλαια

(ii. 7) with αρχαιος = "of the early Christian time," in Polycarp,

_Ep. ad Philipp._, i.

[29] Acts xviii. 18-21. To these general links connecting our Epistles

with Ephesus, a few of less importance, yet not without significance,

may be added. (1) The name of Demetrius (3 John 12) is certainly

suggestive of the holy city of the earth-mother (Acts xix. 24, 38).

Vitruvius assigns the completion of the temple of Ephesus to an

architect of the name, and calls him "servus Dianæ." (2) St. John in

his Gospel adopts, as if instinctively, the computation of time which

was used in Asia Minor (John iv. 6, xix. 4--Hefel. _Martyrium S.

Polycarp_. xxi.). On the same principle he speaks in the Apocalypse of

"day and night" (Apoc. iv. 8, vii. 15, xii. 10, xiv. 11, xx. 10); St.

Paul, on the other hand, speaks of "night and day" (1 Tim. v. 5). It

is a very real indication of the accuracy of the report of words in

the Acts that, while St. Luke himself uses either form indifferently

(Luke ii. 37, xviii. 2), St. Paul, as quoted by him, always says

"night and day" (Acts xx. 31, xxvi. 7). (3) Is it merely fanciful to

conjecture that the unusual αγαθοποιων (3 John 11) may be an allusion

to the astrological language in which alone the term is ever used

outside a very few instances in the sacred writers? "He only is under

a good star, and has beneficent omens for his life." Balbillus, one of

the most famous astrologers of antiquity, the confidant of Nero and

Vespasian, was an Ephesian, and almost supreme in Ephesus, not long

before St. John's arrival there. Sueton., _Neron._, 36.

[30] Aïa-so-Louk, a corruption of ἁγιος θεολογος, _holy theologian_

(or ἁγια θεολογου, _holy city of the theologian_). Some scholars,

however, assert that the word is often pronounced and written

_aiaslyk_, with the common Turkish termination _lyk_. See _S. Paul_

(Renan, 342, note 2).

DISCOURSE II.

_THE CONNECTION OF THE EPISTLE WITH THE GOSPEL OF ST. JOHN._

Συναδυσι μεν γαρ αλληλοις το ευαγγελιον και ἡ επιστολη. _Dionys.

Alexandr. ap Euseb., H. E., vii., 25._

"And these things write we unto you, that your joy may be

full."--1 JOHN i. 4.

From the wholesale burning of books at Ephesus, as a consequence of

awakened convictions, the most pregnant of all commentators upon the

New Testament has drawn a powerful lesson. "True religion," says the

writer, "puts bad books out of the way." Ephesus at great expense

burnt curious and evil volumes, and the "word of God grew and

prevailed." And he proceeds to show how just in the very matter where

Ephesus had manifested such costly penitence, she was rewarded by

being made a sort of depository of the most precious books which ever

came from human pens. St. Paul addresses a letter to the Ephesians.

Timothy was Bishop of Ephesus when the two great pastoral Epistles

were sent to him.[31] All St. John's writings point to the same place.

The Gospel and Epistles were written there, or with primary reference

to the capital of Ionia.[32] The Apocalypse was in all probability

first read at Ephesus.

Of this group of Ephesian books we select two of primary

importance--the Gospel and First Epistle of St. John. Let us dwell

upon the close and thorough connection of the two documents, upon the

interpenetration of the Epistle by the Gospel, by whatever name we may

prefer to designate the connection.

It is said indeed by a very high authority, that while the "whole

Epistle is permeated with thoughts of the person and work of Christ,"

yet "direct references to facts of the Gospel are singularly rare." More

particularly it is stated that "we find here none of the foundation and

(so to speak) crucial events summarised in the earliest Christian

confession as we still find them in the Apostles' creed." And among

these events are placed, "the Birth of the Virgin Mary, the Crucifixion,

the Resurrection, the Ascension, the Session, the Coming to Judgment."

To us there seems to be some exaggeration in this way of putting the

matter. A writing which accompanied a sacred history, and which was a

spiritual comment upon that very history, was not likely to repeat the

history upon which it commented, just in the same shape. Surely the

Birth is the necessary condition of having come in the flesh. The

incident of the piercing of the side, and the water and blood which

flowed from it, is distinctly spoken of; and in that the Crucifixion

is implied. Shrinking with shame from Jesus at His Coming, which is

spoken of in another verse, has no meaning unless that Coming be to

Judgment.[33] The sixth chapter is, if we may so say, the section of

"the Blood," in the fourth Gospel. That section standing in the

Gospel, standing in the great Sacrament of the Church, standing in the

perpetually cleansing and purifying efficacy of the Atonement--ever

present as a witness, which becomes personal, because identified with

a Living Personality[34]--finds its echo and counterpart in the

Epistle towards the beginning and near the close.[35]

We now turn to that which is the most conclusive evidence of connection

between two documents--one historical, the other moral and spiritual--of

which literary composition is capable. Let us suppose that a writer of

profound thoughtfulness has finished, after long elaboration, the

historical record of an eventful and many-sided life--a life of supreme

importance to a nation, or to the general thought and progress of

humanity. The book is sent to the representatives of some community or

school. The ideas which its subject has uttered to the world, from their

breadth and from the occasional obscurity of expression incident to all

great spiritual utterances, need some elucidation. The plan is really

exhaustive, and combines the facts of the life with a full insight into

their relations; but it may be missed by any but thoughtful readers. The

author will accompany this main work by something which in modern

language we might call an introduction, or appendix, or advertisement,

or explanatory pamphlet, or encyclical letter. Now the ancient form of

literary composition rendered books packed with thought doubly difficult

both to read and write; for they did not admit foot-notes, or marginal

analyses, or abstracts. St. John then practically says, first to his

readers in Asia Minor, then to the Church for ever--"with this life of

Jesus I send you not only thoughts for your spiritual benefit, moulded

round His teaching, but something more; I send you an _abstract_, a

compendium of contents, at the beginning of this letter; I also send you

at its close a key to the plan on which my Gospel is conceived." And

surely a careful reader of the Gospel at its first publication would

have desired assistance exactly of this nature. He would have wished to

have a synopsis of contents, short but comprehensive, and a synoptical

view of the author's plan--of the idea which guided him in his choice of

incidents so momentous and of teaching so varied.

We have in the First Epistle two synopses of the Gospel which

correspond with a perfect precision to these claims.[36] We have: (1)

a synopsis of the _contents_ of the Gospel; (2) a synoptical view of

the _conception_ from which it was written.

1. We find in the Epistle at the very outset a synopsis of the

contents of the Gospel.

"That which was from the beginning, that which we have heard, that

which we have seen with our eyes, that which we gazed upon, and our

hands handled--_I speak_ concerning the Word who is the Life--that

which we have seen and heard, declare we unto you also."

What are the contents of the Gospel? (1) A lofty and dogmatic

_proœmium_, which tells us of "the Word who was in the beginning with

God--in Whom was life." (2) _Discourses_ and utterances, sometimes

running on through pages, sometimes brief and broken. (3) _Works_,

sometimes miraculous, sometimes wrought into the common contexture of

human life--looks, influences, seen by the very eyes of St. John and

others, gazed upon with ever deepening joy and wonder. (4) _Incidents_

which proved that all this issued from One who was intensely human;

that it was as real as life and humanity--historical not visionary;

the doing and the effluence of a Manhood which could be, and which

was, grasped by human hands.

Such is a synopsis of the Gospel precisely as it is given in the

beginning of the First Epistle. (1) The Epistle mentions _first_,

"that which was from the beginning." There is the compendium of the

proœmium of the Gospel. (2) One of the most important constituent

parts of the Gospel is to be found in its ample preservation of

dialogues, in which the Saviour is one interlocutor; of monologues

spoken to the hushed hearts of the disciples, or to the listening

Heart of the Father, yet not in tones so low that their love did not

find it audible. This element of the narrative is summed up by the

writer of the Epistle in two words--"That which we heard."[37] (3) The

_works_ of benevolence or power, the doings and sufferings; the

pathos or joy which spring up from them in the souls of the disciples,

occupy a large portion of the Gospel. All these come under the

heading, "that which we have seen with our eyes,[38] that which we

gazed upon,"[39] with one unbroken gaze of wonder as so beautiful, and

of awe as so divine.[40] (4) The assertion of the _reality of the

Manhood_[41] of Him who was yet the Life manifested--a reality through

all His words, works, sufferings--finds its strong, bold summary in

this compendium of the contents of the Gospel, "and our hands have

handled." Nay, a still shorter compendium follows: (1) The Life with

the Father. (2) The Life manifested.[42]

2. But we have more than a synopsis which embraces the contents of the

Gospel at the beginning of the Epistle. We have towards its close a

_second_ synopsis of the whole framework of the Gospel; not now the

theory of the Person of Christ, which in such a life was necessarily

placed at its beginning, but of the human conception which pervaded

the Evangelist's composition.

The second synopsis, not of the contents of the Gospel, but of the aim

and conception which it assumed in the form into which it was moulded

by St. John, is given by the Epistle with a fulness which omits

scarcely a paragraph of the Gospel. In the space of six verses of the

fifth chapter the word _witness_, as verb or substantive, is repeated

_ten_ times.[43] The simplicity of St. John's artless rhetoric can

make no more emphatic claim on our attention. The Gospel is indeed a

tissue woven out of many lines of evidence human and divine. Compress

its purpose into one single word. No doubt it is supremely the Gospel

of the Divinity of Jesus. But, next to that, it may best be defined as

the Gospel of _Witness_. These witnesses we may take in the order of

the Epistle. St. John feels that his Gospel is more than a book; it is

a past made everlastingly present. Such as the great Life was in

history, so it stands for ever. Jesus _is_ "the propitiation, _is_

righteous," "is _here_."[44] So the great influences round His Person,

the manifold witnesses of His Life, stand witnessing for ever in the

Gospel and in the Church. What are these? (1) The Spirit is ever

_witnessing_. So our Lord in the Gospel--"when the Comforter is come,

He shall witness of Me."[45] No one can doubt that the Spirit is one

pre-eminent subject of the Gospel. Indeed, teaching about Him, above

all as the witness to Christ, occupies three unbroken chapters in one

place.[46] (2) The _water_ is ever witnessing. So long as St. John's

Gospel lasts, and permeates the Church with its influence, the water

must so testify. There is scarcely a paragraph of it where water is

not; almost always with some relation to Christ. The witness of the

Baptist[47] is, "I baptize with water." The Jordan itself bears

witness that all its waters cannot give that which He bestows who is

"preferred before" John.[48] Is not the water of Cana that was made

wine a witness to His glory?[49] The birth of "water and of the

Spirit,"[50] is another witness. And so in the Gospel section after

section. The water of Jacob's well; the water of the pool of Bethesda;

the waters of the sea of Galilee, with their stormy waves upon which

He walked; the water outpoured at the feast of tabernacles, with its

application to the river of living water; the water of Siloam; the

water poured into the basin, when Jesus washed the disciples' feet;

the water which, with the blood, streamed from the riven side upon the

cross; the water of the sea of Galilee in its gentler mood, when Jesus

showed Himself on its beach to the seven; as long as all this is

recorded in the Gospel, as long as the sacrament of Baptism, with its

visible water and its invisible grace working in the regenerate,

abides among the faithful;--so long is the water ever witnessing.[51]

(3) The Blood is ever "witnessing." Expiation once for all;

purification continually from the blood outpoured; drinking the blood

of the Son of Man by participation in the sacrament of His love, with

the grace and strength that it gives day by day to innumerable souls;

the Gospel concentrated into that great sacrifice; the Church's gifts

of benediction summarised in the unspeakable Gift; this is the

unceasing witness of the _Blood_. (4) Men are ever witnessing. "The

witness of men" fills the Gospel from beginning to end. The glorious

series of confessions wrung from willing and unwilling hearts form the

points of division round which the whole narrative may be grouped. Let

us think of all those attestations which lie between the Baptist's

precious testimony with the sweet yet fainter utterances of Andrew,

Philip, Nathanael, and the perfect creed of Christendom condensed into

the burning words of Thomas--"my Lord and my God."[52] What a range of

feeling and faith; what a variety of attestation coming from human

souls, sometimes wrung from them half unwillingly, sometimes uttered

at crisis-moments with an impulse that could not be resisted! The

witness of men in the Gospel, and the assurance of one testimony that

was to be given by the Apostles individually and collectively,[53]

besides the evidences already named includes the following--the

witness of Nicodemus, of the Samaritan woman, of the Samaritans, of

the impotent man at the pool of Bethesda, of Simon Peter, of the

officers of the Jewish authorities, of the blind man, of Pilate.[54]

(5) The witness of God occupies also a great position in the fourth

Gospel. That witness may be said to be given in five forms: the

witness of the Father,[55] of Christ Himself,[56] of the Holy

Spirit,[57] of Scripture,[58] of miracles.[59] This great cloud of

witnesses, human and divine, finds its appropriate completion in

another subjective witness.[60] The whole body of evidence passes from

the region of the intellectual to that of the moral and spiritual

life. The _evidence_ acquires that _evidentness_ which is to all our

knowledge what the sap is to the tree. The faithful carries it in his

heart; it goes about with him, rests with him day and night, is close

to him in life and death. He, the principle of whose being is belief

ever going out of itself and resting its acts of faith on the Son of

God, has all that manifold witness in him.[61]

It would be easy to enlarge upon the verbal connection between the

Epistle before us and the Gospel which it accompanied. We might draw out

(as has often been done) a list of quotations from the Gospel, a whole

common treasury of mystic language; but we prefer to leave an undivided

impression upon the mind. A document which gives us a synopsis of the

_contents_ of another document at the beginning, and a synoptical

analysis of its predominant idea at the close, covering the entire work,

and capable of absorbing every part of it (except some necessary

adjuncts of a rich and crowded narrative), has a connection with it

which is vital and absorbing. The Epistle is at once an abstract of the

contents of the Gospel, and a key to its purport. To the Gospel, at

least to it and the Epistle considered as integrally one, the Apostle

refers when he says: "these things write we unto you."[62]

St. John had asserted that one end of his declaration was to make his

readers hold fast "fellowship with us," _i.e._, with the Church as the

Apostolic Church; aye, and that fellowship of ours is "with the

Father, and with His Son Jesus Christ;" "and these things," he

continues (with special reference to his Gospel, as spoken of in his

opening words), "we write unto you, that your joy may be fulfilled."

There is as truly a joy as a "patience and comfort of the Scriptures."

The Apostle here speaks of "your joy," but that implied _his_ also.

All great literature, like all else that is beautiful, is a "joy for

ever." To the true student his books are this. But this is so only

with a few really great books. We are not speaking of works of exact

science. Butler, Pascal, Bacon, Shakespeare, Homer, Scott, theirs is

work of which congenial spirits never grow quite tired. But to be

capable of giving out joy, books must have been written with it. The

Scotch poet tells us, that no poet ever found the Muse, until he had

learned to walk beside the brook, and "no think long." That which is

not thought over with pleasure; that which, as it gradually rises

before the author in its unity, does not fill him with delight; will

never permanently give pleasure to readers. He must know joy before he

can say--"these things write we unto you, that your joy may be full."

The book that is to give joy must be a part of a man's self. That is

just what most books are not. They are laborious, diligent, useful

perhaps; they are not interesting or delightful. How touching it is,

when the poor old stiff hand must write, and the overworked brain

think, for bread! Is there anything so pathetic in literature as Scott

setting his back bravely to the wall, and forcing from his imagination

the reluctant creations which used to issue with such splendid

profusion from its haunted chambers?

Of the conditions under which an inspired writer pursued his labours

we know but little. But some conditions are apparent in the books of

St. John with which we are now concerned. The fourth Gospel is a book

written without _arrière pensée_, without literary conceit, without

the paralysing dread of criticism. What verdict the polished society

of Ephesus would pronounce; what sneers would circulate in philosophic

quarters; what the numerous heretics would murmur in their

conventicles; what critics within the Church might venture to whisper,

missing perhaps favourite thoughts and catch-words;[63] St. John cared

no more than if he were dead. He communed with the memories of the

past; he listened for the music of the Voice which had been the

teacher of his life. To be faithful to these memories, to recall these

words, to be true to Jesus, was his one aim. No one can doubt that the

Gospel was written with a full delight. No one who is capable of

feeling, ever has doubted that it was written as if with "a feather

dropped from an angel's wing;" that without aiming at anything but

truth, it attains in parts at least a transcendent beauty. At the

close of the proœmium, after the completest theological _formula_

which the Church has ever possessed--the still, even pressure of a

tide of thought--we have a parenthetic sentence, like the splendid

unexpected rush and swell of a sudden wave ("we beheld the glory, the

glory as of the Only-Begotten of the Father"); then after the

parenthesis a soft and murmuring fall of the whole great tide ("full

of grace and truth"). Can we suppose that the Apostle hung over his

sentence with literary zest? The number of writers is small who can

give us an everlasting truth by a single word, a single pencil touch;

who, having their mind loaded with thought, are wise enough to keep

that strong and eloquent silence which is the prerogative only of the

highest genius. St. John gives us one of these everlasting pictures,

of these inexhaustible symbols, in three little words--"He then having

received the sop, went immediately out, and _it was night_."[64] Do we

suppose that he admired the perfect effect of that powerful

self-restraint? Just before the crucifixion he writes--"Then came

Jesus forth, wearing the crown of thorns, and the purple robe, and

Pilate saith unto them, Behold the Man!"[65] The pathos, the majesty,

the royalty of sorrow, the admiration and pity of Pilate, have been

for centuries the inspiration of Christian art. Did St. John

congratulate himself upon the image of sorrow and of beauty which

stands for ever in these lines? With St. John as a writer it is as

with St. John delineated in the fresco at Padua by the genius of

Giotto. The form of the ascending saint is made visible through a

reticulation of rays of light in colours as splendid as ever came from

mortal pencil; but the rays issue entirely from the Saviour, whose

face and form are full before him.

The feeling of the Church has always been that the Gospel of St. John

was a solemn work of faith and prayer. The oldest extant fragment upon

the canon of the New Testament tells us that the Gospel was undertaken

after earnest invitations from the brethren and the bishops, with solemn

united fasting; not without special revelation to Andrew the Apostle

that John was to do the work.[66] A later and much less important

document connected in its origin with Patmos embodies one beautiful

legend about the composition of the Gospel. It tells how the Apostle was

about to leave Patmos for Ephesus; how the Christians of the island

besought him to leave in writing an account of the Incarnation, and

mysterious life of the Son of God; how St. John and his chosen friends

went forth from the haunts of men about a mile, and halted in a quiet

spot called the gorge of Rest,[67] and then ascended the mountain which

overhung it. There they remained three days. "Then," writes Prochorus,

"he ordered me to go down to the town for paper and ink. And after two

days I found him standing rapt in prayer. Said he to me--'take the ink

and paper, and stand on my right hand.' And I did so. And there was a

great lightning and thunder, so that the mountain shook. And I fell on

the ground as if dead. Whereupon John stretched forth his hand and took

hold of me, and said--'stand up at this spot at my right hand.' After

which he prayed again, and after his prayer said unto me--'son

Prochorus, what thou hearest from my mouth, write upon the sheets.' And

having opened his mouth as he was standing praying, and looking up to

heaven, he began to say--'in the beginning was the Word, and the Word

was with God, and the Word was God.' And so following on, he spake in

order, standing as he was, and I wrote sitting."[68]

True instinct which tells us that the Gospel of St. John was the fruit

of prayer as well as of memory; that it was thought out in some valley

of rest, some hush among the hills; that it came from a solemn joy which

it breathed forth upon others! "These things write I unto you, that your

joy may be fulfilled." Generation after generation it has been so. In

the numbers numberless of the Redeemed, there can be very few who have

not been brightened by the joy of that book. Still, at one funeral after

another, hearts are soothed by the word in it which says--"I am the

Resurrection and the Life." Still the sorrowful and the dying ask to

hear again and again--"let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be

afraid." A brave young officer sent to the war in Africa, from a

regiment at home, where he had caused grief by his extravagance,

penitent, and dying in his tent, during the fatal day of Isandula,

scrawled in pencil--"dying, dear father and mother--happy--for Jesus

says, 'He that cometh to Me I will in no wise cast out.'" Our English

Communion Office, with its divine beauty, is a texture shot through and

through with golden threads from the discourse at Capernaum. Still are

the disciples glad when they see the Lord in that record. It is the book

of the Church's smiles; it is the gladness of the saints; it is the

purest fountain of joy in all the literature of earth.

* * * * *

NOTE A.

The thorough connection of the Epistle with the Gospel may be made

more clear by the following tabulated analysis:--

The (A) _beginning_ and (B) the _close_ of the Epistle contain _two_

abstracts, longer and shorter, of the contents and bearing of the

Gospel.

A.

_i._--1 John i. 1.

1. "That which was from the beginning--concerning the Word of Life" =

John i. 1-15.

2. (_a_) "Which we have _heard_" = John i. 38, 39, 42, 47, 50, 51, ii.

4, 7, 8, 16, 19, iii. 3, 22, iv. 7, 39, 48, 50, v. 6, 47, vi. 5, 70,

vii. 6, 39, viii. 7, 58, ix. 3, 41, x. 1, 39, xi. 4, 45, xii. 7, 50,

xiii. 6, 38, xiv., xvii., xviii. 14, 37, xix. 11, 26, 27, 28, 30, xx.

15, 16, 17, 19, 21, 23, 27, 29, xxi. 5, 6, 10, 12, 22.

(_b_) "Which we have seen _with our eyes_" = John i. 29, 36, 39, ii.

11, vi. 2, 14, 19, ix., xi. 44, xiii. 4, 5, xvii. 1, xviii. 6, xix. 5,

17, 18, 34, 38, xx. 5, 14, 20, 25, 29, xxi. 1, 14.

(_c_) "Which we gazed upon" = _ibid._

(_d_) "Which we have handled" = John xx. 27 (refers also to a

synoptical Gospel, Luke xxiv. 39, 40).

_ii._--1 John i. 2.

1. "The Life was manifested" = John i. 29--xxi. 25.

2. (_a_) "We have seen" = (A. _i._ 2 (_b_)).

(_b_) "And bear witness" = John i. 7, 19, 37, iii. 2, 27, 33, iv. 39,

vi. 69, xx. 28, 30, 31, xxi. 24.

(_c_) "And declare unto you" = John _passim_.

"The Life, the Eternal Life, which"

א "Was with the Father" = John i. 1-4.

ב "And was manifested unto us" = John _passim_.

B.

_i._--1 John v. 6-10.

Summary of the Gospel as a Gospel of _witness_.

1. "The Spirit beareth witness" = John i. 32, xiv., xv., xx. 22.

2. "The water beareth witness" = John i. 28, ii. 9, iii. 5, iv. 13,

14, v. 1, 9, vi. 19, vii. 37, ix. 7, xiii. 5, xix. 34, xxi. 1.

3. "The blood beareth witness" = John vi. 53, 54, 55, 56, xix. 34.

4. "The witness of men" = (A. _ii._ 1 (_b_)) Also John i. 45, 49, iii.

2, iv. 39, vii. 46, xii. 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 21, xviii. 38, xix. 35,

xx. 28.

5. "The witness of God" =

(_a_) Scripture = John i. 45, v. 39, 46, xix. 36, 37.

(_b_) Christ's own = John viii. 17, 18, 46, xv. 30, xviii. 37.

(_c_) His Father's = John v. 37, viii. 18, xii. 28.

(_d_) His works = John v. 36, x. 25, xv. 24.

_ii._--1 John v. 20.

We know (_i.e._, by the Gospel) that--

1. "The Son of God is come" (ἡκεν), "has come and is here."

Note.--בָאחִי = ἡκω, LXX. Psalm xl. 7. "_Venio_ symbolum quasi Domini

Jesu fuit." (Bengel on Heb. x. 7), the _Ich Dien_ of the Son of the

Father--εγω γαρ εκ του θεου εξηλθον και ἡκω. "I came forth from God,

and am here" (John viii. 4) = John i. 29--xxi. 23 (John xiv. 18, 21,

23, xvi. 16, 22, form part of the thought "is here").

2. "And hath given us an understanding" = gift of the Spirit, John

xiv., xv., xvi. (especially 13, 16).

3. "This is the very God and eternal Life" = John i. 1, 4.

The whole Gospel of St. John brings out these primary principles of

the Faith,--

That the Son of God has come. That He is now and ever present with His

people. That the Holy Spirit gives them a new faculty of spiritual

discernment. That Christ is the very God and the Life of men.

FOOTNOTES:

[31] Bengel, on Acts xix. 19, 20, finds a reference to manuscripts of

some of the synoptical Gospels and of the Epistles in 2 Tim. iv. 13,

and conjectures that, after St. Paul's martyrdom, Timothy carried them

with him to Ephesus.

[32] Renan's curious theory that Rom. xvi. 1-16 is a sheet of the

Epistle to the Ephesians accidentally misplaced, rests upon a supposed

prevalence of Ephesian names in the case of those who are greeted.

Archdeacon Gifford's refutation, and his solution of an unquestionable

difficulty, seems entirely satisfactory. (_Speaker's Commentary, in

loc._, vol. iii., New Testament.)

[33] It has become usual to say that the Epistle does not advert to

John iii. or John vi. To us it seems that _every_ mention of the Birth

of God _is_ a reference to John iii. (1 John ii. 23, iii. 9, iv. 7, v.

1-4.) The word αιμα occurs _once_ only in the fourth Gospel outside

the sixth chapter (xix. 34; for i. 13 belongs to physiology). Four

times we find it in that chapter--vi. 53, 54, 55, 56. Each mention of

the "Blood" in connection with our Lord _does_ advert to John vi.

[34] The masc. part. οι μαρτυρουντες is surely very remarkable with

the three neuters (το πνευμα, το ὑδωρ, το αιμα) 1 John v. 7, 8.

[35] 1 John i. 7, v. 6, 8.

[36] See note A. at the end of this Discourse, which shows that there

are, in truth, _four_ such summaries.

[37] ὁ ακηκοαμεν.

[38] ὁ εωρακαμεν τοις οφθαλμοις ἡμων.

[39] John xx. 20.

[40] ὁ εθεασαμεθα, 1 John i. 1. The same word is used in John i. 14.

[41] John xix. 27 would express this in the most palpable form. But it

is constantly understood through the Gospel. The tenacity of Doketic

error is evident from the fact that Chrysostom, preaching at Antioch,

speaks of it as a popular error in his day. A little later, orthodox

ears were somewhat offended by some beautiful lines of a Greek sacred

poet, too little known among us, who combines in a singular degree

Roman gravity with Greek grace. St. Romanus (A.D. 491) represents our

Lord as saying of the sinful woman who became a penitent,

την βρεξασαν ιχνη

ἁ ουκ ἑβρεξε βυθος

ψιλοις τοτε τοις δακρυσιν.

"Which with her tears, then pure,

Wetted the feet the sea-depth wetted not."

(_Spicil. Solesmen._ Edidit T. B. Pitra, _S. Romanus_, xvi. 13, _Cant.

de Passione._ 120.)

[42] 1 John i. 2. The Life with the Father = John i. 1, 14. The Life

manifested = John i. 14 to end.

[43] The A.V. (1 John v. 6-12) obscures this by a too great

sensitiveness to monotony. The language of the verses is varied

unfortunately by "bear record" (ver. 7), "hath testified" (ver. 9),

"believeth not the record" (ver. 10), "this is the record" (ver. 11).

[44] 1 John ii. 2-29, iii. 7, iv. 3, v. 20.

[45] John xv. 26.

[46] John xiv., xv., xvi., Cf. vii. 39. The witness of the Spirit in

the Apostolic ministry will be found John xx. 22.

[47] John i. 19.

[48] John i. 16, 31, 33.

[49] John ii. 9, iv. 46.

[50] John iii. 5.

[51] John iv. 5, 7, 11, 12, v. 1, 8, vi. 19, vii. 35, 37, ix. 7, xiii.

1, 14, xix. 34, xxi. 1, 8. In the other great Johannic book water is

constantly mentioned. Apoc. vii. 7, xiv. 7, xvi. 5, xxi. 6, xxii. 1,

xxii. 17. (Cf. the το ὑδωρ, Acts x. 47.)

[52] John i. 19, 29, 32, 34, 35, 36, 41, 45, 47, xix. 27.

[53] John xv. 27.

[54] John iii. 2. The Baptist's final witness (iii. 25, 33, iv. 39,

42, v. 15, vi. 68, 69, vii. 46, xix. 4, 6). Note, too, the

accentuation of the idea of _witness_ (John v. 31, 39). It is to be

regretted that the R.V. also has sometimes obscured this important

term by substituting a different English word, _e.g._, "the word of

the woman who _testified_" (John iv. 39).

[55] John viii. 18, xii. 28.

[56] Ibid. viii. 17, 18.

[57] Ibid. xv. 26.

[58] Ibid. v. 39, 46, xix. 35, 36, 37.

[59] Ibid. v. 36.

[60] This sixth witness (1 John v. 10) exactly answers to John xx. 30,

31.

[61] ὁ πιστευων εις τον υιον, κτλ (v. 10). The construction is different

in the words which immediately follow (ὁ μη πιστευων τω θεγ), not even

giving Him credence, not _believing Him_, much less _believing on Him_.

[62] The view here advocated of the relation of the Epistle to the

Gospel of St. John, and of the brief but complete analytical synopsis

in the opening words of the Epistle, appears to us to represent the

earliest known interpretation as given by the author of the famous

fragment of the Muratorian Canon, the first catalogue of the books of

the N. T. (written between the middle and close of the second

century). After his statement of the circumstances which led to the

composition of the fourth Gospel, and an assertion of the perfect

internal unity of the Evangelical narratives, the author of the

fragment proceeds. "What wonder then if John brings forward each

matter, point by point, with such consecutive order (tam constanter

singula), even in his Epistles saying, when he comes to write in his

own person (dicens in semetipso), 'what we have seen with our eyes,

and heard with our ears, and our hands have handled, these things have

we written.' For thus, in orderly arrangement and consecutive language

he professes himself not only an eye-witness, but a hearer, and yet

further a writer of the wonderful things of the Lord." [So we

understand the writer. "Sic enim non solum visorem, sed et auditorem,

sed et scriptorem omnium mirabilium Domini, per ordinem profitetur."

The fragment, with copious annotations, may be found in _Reliquæ

Sacræ_, Routh, Tom. i., 394, 434.]

[63] For whatever reason, four classical terms (if we may so call them)

of the Christian religion are excluded, or nearly excluded, from the

Gospel of St. John, and from its companion document. _Church_, _gospel_,

_repentance_, occur nowhere. _Grace_ only once (John i. 14; see,

however, 2 John 3; Apoc. i. 4; xxii. 21), _faith_ as a substantive only

once. (1 John v. 4, but in Apoc. ii. 13-19; xiii. 10; xiv. 123.)

[64] ἡν δε νυξ. John xiii. 30.

[65] John xix. 5.

[66] Canon. Murator. (apud Routh., _Reliq. Sacræ_, Tom. i., 394).

[67] εν τοπω ἡσυχω λεγομενω καταπαυσις.

[68] This passage is translated from the Greek text of the manuscript

of Patmos, attributed to Prochorus, as given by M. Guérin.

(_Description de l'Isle de Patmos_, pp. 25-29.)

DISCOURSE III.

_THE POLEMICAL ELEMENT IN THE FIRST EPISTLE OF ST. JOHN._

"Dum Magistri super pectus

Fontem haurit intellectûs

Et doctrinæ flumina,

Fiunt, ipso situ loci,

Verbo fides, auris voci,

Mens Deo contermina.

"Unde mentis per excessus,

Carnis, sensûs super gressus,

_Errorumque nubila_,

Contra veri solis lumen

Visum cordis et acumen

Figit velut aquila."

_Adam of St. Victor_, Seq. xxxii.

"Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the

flesh is of God. Every spirit that confesseth not [that] Jesus

Christ [is come in the flesh] is not of God."--1 JOHN iv. 2, 3.

A discussion (however far from technical completeness) of the

polemical element in St. John's Epistle, probably seems likely to be

destitute of interest or of instruction, except to ecclesiastical or

philosophical antiquarians. Those who believe the Epistle to be a

_divine_ book must, however, take a different view of the matter. St.

John was not merely dealing with forms of human error which were local

and fortuitous. In refuting _them_ he was enunciating principles of

universal import, of almost illimitable application. Let us pass by

those obscure sects, those subtle curiosities of error, which the

diligence of minute research has excavated from the masses of

erudition under which they have been buried; which theologians, like

other antiquarians, have sometimes labelled with names at once uncouth

and imaginative. Let us fix our attention upon such broad and

well-defined features of heresy as credible witnesses have indelibly

fixed upon the contemporaneous heretical thought of Asia Minor; and we

shall see not only a great precision in St. John's words, but a

radiant image of truth, which is equally adapted to enlighten us in

the peculiar dangers of our age.

Controversy is the condition under which all truth must be held, which

is not in necessary subject-matter--which is not either mathematical

or physical. In the case of the second, controversy is active, until

the fact of the physical law is established beyond the possibility of

rational discussion; until self-consistent thought can only think upon

the postulate of its admission. Now in these departments all the

argument is on one side. We are not in a state of suspended

speculation, leaning neither to affirmation nor denial, which is

_doubt_. We are not in the position of inclining either to one side or

the other, by an almost impalpable overplus of evidence, which is

_suspicion_; or by those additions to this slender stock, which

convert suspicion into _opinion_. We are not merely yielding a strong

adhesion to one side, while we must yet admit, to ourselves at least,

that our knowledge is not perfect, nor absolutely manifest--which is

the mental and moral position of _belief_. In necessary

subject-matter, we know and see with that perfect intellectual vision

for which controversy is impossible.[69]

The region of belief must therefore, in our present condition, be a

region from which controversy cannot be excluded.

Religious controversialists may be divided into three classes, for each

of which we may find an emblem in the animal creation. The first are the

nuisances, at times the numerous nuisances, of Churches. These

controversialists delight in showing that the convictions of persons

whom they happen to dislike, can, more or less plausibly, be pressed to

unpopular conclusions. They are incessant fault-finders. Some of them,

if they had an opportunity, might delight in finding the sun guilty in

his daily worship of the many-coloured ritualism of the western clouds.

Controversialists of this class, if minute are venomous, and capable of

inflicting a degree of pain quite out of proportion to their strength.

Their emblem may be found somewhere in the range of "every creeping

thing that creepeth upon the earth." The second class of

controversialists is of a much higher nature. Their emblem is the hawk

with his bright eye, with the forward throw of his pinions, his rushing

flight along the woodland skirt, his unerring stroke. Such hawks of the

Churches, whose delight is in pouncing upon fallacies, fulfil an

important function. They rid us of tribes of mischievous winged errors.

The third class of controversialists is that which embraces St. John

supremely--such minds also as Augustine's in his loftiest and most

inspired moments, such as those which have endowed the Church with the

Nicene Creed. Of such the eagle is the emblem. Over the grosser

atmosphere of earthly anger or imperfect motives, over the clouds of

error, poised in the light of the True Sun, with the eagle's upward wing

and the eagle's sunward eye, St. John looks upon the truth. He is indeed

the eagle of the four Evangelists, the eagle of God. If the eagle could

speak with our language, his style would have something of the purity of

the sky and of the brightness of the light. He would warn his nestlings

against losing their way in the banks of clouds that lie below him so

far. At times he might show that there is a danger or an error whose

position he might indicate by the sweep of his wing, or by descending

for a moment to strike.

There are then _polemics_ in the Epistle and in the Gospel of St.

John. But we refuse to hunt down some obscure heresy in every

sentence. It will be enough to indicate the master heresy of Asia

Minor, to which St. John undoubtedly refers, with its intellectual and

moral perils. In so doing, we shall find the very truth which our own

generation especially needs.

The prophetic words addressed by St. Paul to the Church of Ephesus

thirty years before the date of this Epistle had found only too

complete a fulfilment. "From among their own selves," at Ephesus in

particular, through the Churches of Asia Minor in general, men _had_

arisen "speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after

them."[70] The prediction began to justify itself when Timothy was

Bishop of Ephesus only five or six years later. A few significant

words in the First Epistle to Timothy let us see the heretical

influences that were at work. St. Paul speaks with the solemnity of a

closing charge when he warns Timothy against what were at once[71]

"profane babblings," and "antitheses of the Gnosis which is falsely so

called." In an earlier portion of the same Epistle the young Bishop is

exhorted to charge certain men not to teach a "different doctrine,"

neither to give "heed to myths and genealogies," out of whose endless

mazes no intellect entangled in them can ever find its way.[72] Those

commentators put us on a false scent who would have us look after

Judaizing error, Jewish "stemmata." The reference is not to Judaistic

ritualism, but to semi-Pagan philosophical speculation. The

"genealogies" are systems of divine potencies which the Gnostics (and

probably some Jewish Rabbis of Gnosticising tendency) called

"æons,"[73] and so the earliest Christian writers understood the word.

Now without entering into the details of Gnosticism, this may be said

of its general method and purpose. It aspired at once to accept and to

transform the Christian creed; to elevate its faith into a philosophy,

a _knowledge_--and then to make this knowledge cashier and supersede

faith, love, holiness, redemption itself.

This system was strangely eclectic, and amalgamated certain elements not

only of Greek and Egyptian, but of Persian and Indian Pantheistic

thought. It was infected throughout with dualism and doketism. Dualism

held that all good and evil in the universe proceeded from two first

principles, good and evil. Matter was the power of evil whose home is in

the region of darkness. Minds which started from this fundamental view

could only accept the Incarnation provisionally and with reserve, and

must at once proceed to explain it away. "The Word was made flesh;" but

the Word of God, the True Light, could not be personally united to an

actual material system called a human body, plunged in the world of

matter, darkened and contaminated by its immersion. The human flesh in

which Jesus appeared to be seen was fictitious. Redemption was a drama

with a shadow for its hero. The phantom of a redeemer was nailed to the

phantom of a cross. Philosophical dualism logically became theological

_doketism_. Doketism logically evaporated dogmas, sacraments, duties,

redemption.[74]

It may be objected that this doketism has been a mere temporary and

local aberration of the human intellect; a metaphysical curiosity,

with no real roots in human nature. If so, its refutation is an

obsolete piece of an obsolete controversy; and the Epistle in some of

its most vital portions is a dead letter.

Now of course literal doketism is past and gone, dead and buried. The

progress of the human mind, the slow and resistless influence of the

logic of common sense, the wholesome influence of the sciences of

observation in correcting visionary metaphysics, have swept away æons,

emanations, dualism,[75] and the rest. But a subtler, and to modern

minds infinitely more attractive, doketism is round us, and accepted,

as far as words go, with a passionate enthusiasm.

What is this doketism?

Let us refer to the history and to the language of a mind of singular

subtlety and power.

In George Eliot's early career she was induced to prepare for the

press a translation of Strauss's mythical explanation of _the Life of

Jesus_. It is no disrespect to so great a memory to say, that at that

period of her career, at least, Miss Evans must have been unequal to

grapple with such a work, if she desired to do so from a Christian

point of view. She had not apparently studied the history or the

structure of the Gospels. What she knew of their meaning she had

imbibed from an antiquated and unscientific school of theologians. The

faith of a sciolist engaged in a struggle for its life with the fatal

strength of a critical giant instructed in the negative lore of all

ages, and sharpened by hatred of the Christian religion, met with the

result which was to be expected. Her faith expired, not without some

painful throes. She fell a victim to the fallacy of youthful

conceit--I cannot answer this or that objection, _therefore_ it is

unanswerable. She wrote at first that she was "Strauss-sick." It made

her ill to dissect the beautiful story of the crucifixion. She took to

herself a consolation singular in the circumstances. The sight of an

ivory crucifix, and of a pathetic picture of the Passion, made her

capable of enduring the first shock of the loss which her heart had

sustained. That is, she found comfort in looking at tangible reminders

of a scene which had ceased to be an historical reality, of a sufferer

who had faded from a living Redeemer into the spectre of a visionary

past. After a time, however, she feels able to propose to herself and

others "a new starting point. We can never have a satisfactory basis

for the history of the man Jesus, but that negation does not affect

the Idea of the Christ, either in its historical influence, or its

great symbolic meanings."[76] Yes! a Christ who has no history, of

whom we do not possess one undoubted word, of whom we know, and can

know, nothing; who has no flesh of fact, no blood of life; an idea,

not a man; this is the Christ of modern doketism. The method of this

widely diffused school is to separate the _sentiments_ of admiration

which the history inspires from the _history_ itself; to sever the

_ideas_ of the faith from the _facts_ of the faith, and then to

present the _ideas_ thus surviving the dissolvents of criticism, as at

once the refutation of the facts and the substitute for them.

This may be pretty writing, though false and illogical writing is

rarely even _that_; but a little consideration will show that this new

starting point is not even a plausible substitute for the old belief.

(1) We question simple believers in the first instance. We ask them

what is the great religious power in Christianity for themselves, and

for others like-minded? What makes people pure, good, self-denying,

nurses of the sick, missionaries to the heathen? They will tell us

that the power lies, not in any doketic idea of a Christ-life which

was never lived, but in "the conviction that that idea was really and

perfectly incarnated in an actual career,"[77] of which we have a

record literally and absolutely true in all essential particulars.

When we turn to the past of the Church, we find that as it is with

these persons, so it has ever been with the saints. For instance, we

hear St. Paul speaking of his whole life. He tells us that "whether we

went out of ourselves it was unto God, or whether we be sober, it is

for you;" that is to say, such a life has two aspects, one God-ward,

one man-ward. Its God-ward aspect is a noble insanity, its man-ward

aspect a noble sanity; the first with its beautiful enthusiasm, the

second with its saving common sense. What is the source of this?

"_For_ the love of Christ constraineth us,"--forces the whole stream

of life to flow between these two banks without the deviations of

selfishness--"because we thus judge, that He died for all, that they

which live should no longer live unto themselves, but to Him who for

their sakes died and rose again."[78] It was the real unselfish life

of a real unselfish Man which made such a life as that of St. Paul a

possibility. Or we may think of the first beginning of St. John's love

for our Lord. When he turned to the past, he remembered one bright day

about ten in the morning, when the real Jesus turned to him and to

another with a real look, and said with a human voice, "what seek ye?"

and then--"come, and ye shall see."[79] It was the real living love

that won the only kind of love which could enable the old man to write

as he did in this Epistle so many years afterwards--"we love because

He first loved us."[80]

(2) We address ourselves next to those who look at Christ simply as an

ideal. We venture to put to them a definite question. You believe that

there is no solid basis for the history of the man Jesus; that His life

as an historical reality is lost in a dazzling mist of legend and

adoration. Has the idea of a Christ, divorced from all accompaniment of

authentic fact, unfixed in a definite historical form, uncontinued in an

abiding existence, been operative or inoperative for yourselves? Has it

been a practical power and motive, or an occasional and evanescent

sentiment? There can be no doubt about the answer. It is not a

make-belief but a belief which gives purity and power. It is not an

ideal of Jesus but the blood of Jesus which cleanseth us from all sin.

There are other lessons of abiding practical importance to be drawn

from the polemical elements in St. John's Epistle. These, however, we

can only briefly indicate because we wish to leave an undivided

impression of that which seems to be St. John's chief object

_controversially_. There were Gnostics in Asia Minor for whom the

mere _knowledge_ of certain supposed spiritual truths was all in all,

as there are those amongst ourselves who care for little but what are

called clear views. For such St. John writes--"and hereby we do _know_

that we _know_ Him, if we keep His commandments."[81] There were

heretics in and about Ephesus who conceived that the special favour of

God, or the illumination which they obtained by junction with the sect

to which they had "gone out" from the Church, neutralised the poison

of sin, and made innocuous for _them_ that which might have been

deadly for others. They suffered, as they thought, no more

contamination by it, than "gold by lying upon the dunghill" (to use a

favourite metaphor of their own). St. John utters a principle which

cleaves through every fallacy in every age, which says or insinuates

that sin subjective can in any case cease to be sin objective.

"Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law, for sin is the

transgression of the law. All unrighteousness is sin."[82] Possibly

within the Church itself, certainly among the sectarians without it,

there was a disposition to lessen the glory of the Incarnation, by

looking upon the Atonement as narrow and partial in its aim. St.

John's unhesitating statement is that "He is the propitiation for the

whole world." Thus does the eagle of the Church ever fix his gaze

above the clouds of error, upon the Sun of universal truth.

Above all, over and through his negation of temporary and local errors

about the person of Christ, St. John leads the Church in all ages to

the true Christ. Cerinthus, in a form which seems to us eccentric and

revolting, proclaimed a Jesus not born of a virgin, temporarily

endowed with the sovereign power of the Christ, deprived of Him

before his passion and resurrection, while the Christ remained

spiritual and impassible. He taught a _commonplace_ Jesus. At the

beginning of his Epistle and Gospel, John "wings his soul, and leads

his readers onward and upward." He is like a man who stands upon the

shore and looks upon town and coast and bay. Then another takes the

man off with him far to sea. All that he surveyed before is now lost

to him; and as he gazes ever oceanward, he does not stay his eye upon

any intervening object, but lets it range over the infinite azure. So

the Apostle leads us above all creation, and transports us to the ages

before it; makes us raise our eyes, not suffering us to find any end

in the stretch above, since end is none.[83] That "in the beginning,"

"from the beginning," of the Epistle and Gospel, includes nothing

short of the eternal God. The doketics of many shades proclaimed an

ideological, a misty Christ. "Every spirit which confesseth Jesus

Christ as in flesh having come is of God, and every spirit which

confesseth not Jesus, is not of God." "Many deceivers have gone out

into the world, they who confess not Jesus Christ coming in

flesh."[84] Such a Christ of mist as these words warn us against is

again shaped by more powerful intellects and touched with tenderer

lights. But the shadowy Christ of George Eliot and of Mill is equally

arraigned by the hand of St. John. Each believer may well think within

himself--I must die, and that, it may be, very soon; I must be alone

with God, and my own soul; with that which I am, and have been; with

my memories, and with my sins. In that hour the weird desolate

language of the Psalmist will find its realisation: "lover and friend

hast thou put from me, and mine acquaintance are--_darkness_."[85]

Then we want, and then we may find, a real Saviour. Then we shall know

that if we have only a doketic Christ, we shall indeed be alone--for

"except ye eat the flesh of the Son of Man, and drink His blood, ye

have no life in you."[86]

* * * * *

NOTE.

The two following extracts, in addition to what has been already said

in this discourse, will supply the reader with that which it is most

necessary for him to know upon the heresies of Asia Minor. 1. "Two

principal heresies upon the nature of Christ then prevailed, each

diametrically opposite to the other, as well as to the Catholic faith.

One was the heresy of the Doketæ, which destroyed the verity of the

_Human Nature_ in Christ; the other was the heresy of the Ebionites,

who denied the _Divine Nature_, and the eternal Generation, and

inclined to press the observation of the ceremonial law. Ancient

writers allow these as heresies of the first century; all admit that

they were powerful in the age of Ignatius. Hence Theodoret (_Proœm._)

divided the books of these heresies into two categories. In the first

he included those who put forward the idea of a second Creator, and

asserted that the Lord had appeared illusively. In the second he

placed those who maintained that the Lord was merely a man. Of the

first, Jerome observed (_Adv. Lucifer._ xxiii.) 'that while the

Apostles yet remained upon the earth, while the blood of Christ was

almost smoking upon the sod of Judæa, some asserted that the body of

the Lord was a phantom.' Of the second, the same writer remarked that

'St. John, at the invitation of the bishops of Asia Minor, wrote his

Gospel against Cerinthus and other heretics--and especially against

the dogma of the Ebionites then rising into existence, who asserted

that Christ did not exist before Mary.' Epiphanius notes that these

heresies were mainly of Asia Minor (φημι δε εν τη' Ασια). _Hæres._

lvi." (Pearson, _Vindic. Ignat._, ii., c. i., p. 351.)

2. "Two of these sects or schools are very ancient, and seem to have

been referred to by St. John. The first is that of the Naassenians or

Ophites. The antiquity of this sect is guaranteed to us by the author

of the _Philosophumena_, who represents them as the real founders of

Gnosticism. "Later," he says, "they were called _Gnostics_, pretending

that they only _knew the depths_." (To this allusion is made Apoc. ii.

24, which would identify these sectaries with the Balaamites and

Nicolaitans.) The second of these great heresies of Asia Minor is the

doketic. The publication of the _Philosophumena_ has furnished us with

much more precise information about their tenets. We need not say much

about the divine emanation--the fall of souls into matter, their

corporeal captivity, their final rehabilitation (these are merely the

ordinary Gnostic ideas). But we may follow what they assert about the

Saviour and His manifestation in the world. They admit in Him the only

Son of the Father (ὁ μονογενης παις ανωθεν αιωνιος), who descended to

the reign of shadows and the Virgin's womb, where He clothed Himself

in a gross, human material body. But this was a vestment of no

integrally personal and permanent character; it was, indeed, a sort of

masquerade, an artifice or fiction imagined to deceive the prince of

this world. The Saviour at His baptism received a second birth, and

clad Himself with a subtler texture of body, formed in the bosom of

the waters--if that can be termed a body which was but a fantastic

texture woven or framed upon the model of His earthly body. During the

hours of the Passion, the flesh formed in Mary's womb, and it alone,

was nailed to the tree. The great Archon or Demiurgus, whose work that

flesh was, was played upon and deceived, in pouring His wrath only

upon the work of His hands. For the soul, or spiritual substance,

which had been wounded in the flesh of the Saviour, extricated itself

from this as from an unmeet and hateful vesture; and itself

contributing to nailing it to the cross, triumphed by that very flesh

over principalities and powers. It did not, however, remain naked, but

clad in the subtler form which it had assumed in its baptismal second

birth (_Philosoph._, viii. 10). What is remarkable in this theory is,

first, the admission of the reality of the terrestrial body, formed in

the Virgin's womb, and then nailed to the cross. The _negation_ is

only of the _real_ and permanent union of this body with the heavenly

spirit which inhabits it. We shall, further, note the importance which

it attaches to the Saviour's baptism, and the part played by water, as

if an intermediate element between flesh and spirit. This may bear

upon 1 John v. 8."

[This passage is from a _Dissertation--les Trois Témoins Célestes_, in

a collection of religious and literary papers by French scholars (Tom.

ii., Sept. 1868, pp. 388-392). The author, since deceased, was the

Abbé Le Hir, M. Renan's instructor in Hebrew at Saint Sulpice, and

pronounced by his pupil one of the first of European Hebraists and

scientific theologians.]

FOOTNOTES:

[69] "Proprium est credentis ut cum assensu cogitet." "The intellect

of him who believes assents to the thing believed, not because he sees

that thing either in itself or by logical reference to first

self-evident principles; but because it is so far convinced by Divine

authority as to assent to things which it does not see, and on account

of the dominance of the will in setting the intellect in motion." This

sentence is taken from a passage of Aquinas which appears to be of

great and permanent value. _Summa Theolog._ 2^a, 2^æ quæst. i. art. 4.

quæst. v. art. 2.

[70] Acts xx. 30.

[71] τας βεβηλους κενοφωνιας, και αντιθεσεις της ψευδωνυμου γνωσεως. 1

Tim. vi. 20. The "antitheses" may either touch with slight sarcasm upon

pompous pretensions to scientific logical method; or may denote the

really self-contradictory character of these elaborate compositions; or

again, their polemical opposition to the Christian creed.

[72] μυθοις και γενεαλογιαις απεραντοις. 1 Tim. i. 3, 4.

[73] Irenæus quotes 1 Tim. i. 4, and interprets it of the Gnostic

'æons.' _Adv. Hæres._, i. Proœm.

[74] Few phenomena of criticism are more unaccountable than the desire

to evade any acknowledgment of the historical existence of these

singular heresies. Not long after St. John's death, Polycarp, in

writing to the Philippians, quotes 1 John iv. 3, and proceeds to show

that doketism had consummated its work down to the last fibres of the

root of the creed, by two negations--no resurrection of the body, no

judgment. (Polycarp, _Epist. ad Philip._, vii.) Ignatius twice deals

with the Doketæ at length. To the Trallians he delivers what may be

called an antidoketic creed, concluding in the tone of one who was

wounded by what he was daily hearing. "Be deaf then when any man

speaks unto you without Jesus Christ, who is of Mary, who truly was

born, truly suffered under Pontius Pilate, truly was crucified and

died, truly also was raised from the dead. But if some who are

unbelieving say that He suffered apparently, _as if in vision, being

visionary themselves_, why am I a prisoner? why do I choose to fight

with wild beasts?" (Ignat., _Ep. ad Trall._, iv. x.) The play upon the

name doketæ cannot be mistaken (λεγουσιν το δοκειν πεπονθεναι αυτον,

αυτοι οντες το δοκειν). Ignatius writes to another Church--"What

profited it me if one praiseth me but blasphemeth my Lord, not

confessing that He bears true human flesh. They abstain from Eucharist

and prayer, because they confess not that the Eucharist is flesh of

our Saviour Jesus Christ." (_Ep. ad Smyrn._, v. vi. vii.)

[75] The elder Mr. Mill, however, appears to have seriously leaned to

this as a conceivable solution of the contradictory phenomena of

existence.

[76] _Life_ vol. ii., 359, 360.

[77] Much use has here been made of a truly remarkable article in the

_Spectator_, Jan. 31st, 1885.

[78] 2 Cor. v. 13-15.

[79] John i. 43.

[80] 1 John iv. 19.

[81] 1 John ii. 3.

[82] 1 John iii. 4, v. 17.

[83] Every one who reads Greek should refer to the magnificent

passage, _S. Joann. Chrysos., in Joann., Homil._ ii. 4.

[84] 1 John iv. 2; 2 John v. 7. See notes on the passages.

[85] Psalm lviii. 18.

[86] John vi. 53.

DISCOURSE IV.

_THE IMAGE OF ST. JOHN'S SOUL IN HIS EPISTLE._

"He that loveth pureness of heart, for the grace of his lips the king

shall be his friend."--PROV. xxii. 11.

ὁ θεμελιος.... ὁ δευτερος σαπφειρος.--APOC. xxi. 19.

"We know that whosoever is born of God sinneth not; but he that is

begotten of God keepeth himself, and that wicked one toucheth him

not. And we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in

wickedness. And we know that the Son of God is come, and hath

given us an understanding that we may know Him that is true, and

we are in Him that is true, even in His Son Jesus Christ. This is

the true God and eternal life."--1 JOHN v. 18-20.

Much has been said in the last few years of a series of subtle and

delicate experiments in sound. Means have been devised of doing for

the ear something analogous to that which glasses do for another

sense, and of making the results palpable by a system of notation. We

are told that every tree for instance, according to its foliage, its

position, and the direction of the winds, has its own prevalent note

or tone, which can be marked down, and its _timbre_ made first visible

by this notation, and then audible. So is it with the souls of the

saints of God, and chiefly of the Apostles. Each has its own note, the

prevalent key on which its peculiar music is set. Or we may employ

another image which possibly has St. John's own authority. Each of the

twelve has his peculiar emblem among the twelve vast and precious

foundation stones which underlie the whole wall of the Church. St.

John may thus differ from St. Peter, as the sapphire's azure differs

from the jasper's strength and radiance. Each is beautiful, but with

its own characteristic tint of beauty.[87]

We propose to examine the peculiarities of St. John's spiritual nature

which may be traced in this Epistle. We try to form some conception of

the key on which it is set, of the colour which it reflects in the

light of heaven, of the image of a soul which it presents. In this

attempt we cannot be deceived. St. John is so transparently honest; he

takes such a deep, almost terribly severe view of truth. We find him

using an expression about truth which is perhaps without a parallel in

any other writer. "If we say that we have fellowship with Him and walk

in darkness we lie, and are not _doing the truth_."[88] The truth then

for him is something co-extensive with our whole nature and whole

life. Truth is not only to be _spoken_--that is but a fragmentary

manifestation of it. It is to be _done_. It would have been for him

the darkest of lies to have put forth a spiritual commentary on his

Gospel which was not realised in himself. In the Epistle, no doubt, he

uses the first person singular sparingly, modestly including himself

in the simple _we_ of Christian association. Yet we are as sure of the

perfect accuracy of the picture of his soul, of the music in his heart

which he makes visible and audible in his letter, as we are that he

heard the voice of many waters, and saw the city coming down from God

out of heaven; as sure, as if at the close of this fifth chapter he

had added with the triumphant emphasis of truth, in his simple and

stately way, "I John heard these things and saw them."[89] He closes

this letter with a threefold affirmation of certain primary postulates

of the Christian life; of its _purity_,[90] of its _privilege_[91], of

its _Presence_,[92]--"we know," "we know," "we know." In each case the

plural might be exchanged for the singular. He says "_we_ know,"

because he is sure "_I_ know."

In studying the Epistles of St. John we may well ask what we see and

hear therein of St. John's character, (1) as a sacred writer, (2) as a

saintly soul.

I.

We consider first the indications in the Epistle of the Apostle's

character as a sacred writer.

For help in this direction we do not turn with much satisfaction to

essays or annotations pervaded by the modern spirit. The textual

criticism of minute scholarship is no doubt much, but it is not all.

Aorists are made for man, not man for the aorist. He indeed who has

not traced every fibre of the sacred text with grammar and lexicon

cannot quite honestly claim to be an _expositor_ of it. But in the

case of a book like Scripture this, after all, is but an important

preliminary. The frigid subtlety of the commentator who always seems

to have the questions for a divinity examination before his eyes,

fails in the glow and elevation necessary to bring us into communion

with the spirit of St. John. Led by such guides, the Apostle passes

under our review as a third-rate writer of a magnificent language in

decadence, not as the greatest of theologians and masters of the

spiritual life--with whatever defects of literary style, at once the

Plato of the twelve in one region, and the Aristotle in the other; the

first by his "lofty inspiration," the second by his "judicious

utilitarianism." The deepest thought of the Church has been brooding

for seventeen centuries over these pregnant and many-sided words, so

many of which are the very words of Christ. To separate ourselves from

this vast and beautiful commentary is to place ourselves out of the

atmosphere in which we can best feel the influence of St. John.

Let us read Chrysostom's description of the style and thought of the

author of the fourth Gospel. "The son of thunder, the loved of Christ,

the pillar of the Churches, who leaned on Jesus' bosom, makes his

entrance. He plays no drama, he covers his head with no mask. Yet he

wears array of inimitable beauty. For he comes having his feet shod

with the preparation of the Gospel of peace, and his loins girt, not

with fleece dyed in purple, or bedropped with gold, but woven through

and through with, and composed of, the truth itself. He will now

appear before us, not dramatically, for with him there is no

theatrical effect or fiction, but with his head bared he tells the

bare truth. All these things he will speak with absolute accuracy,

being the friend of the King Himself--aye, having the King speaking

within him, and hearing all things from Him which He heareth from the

Father; as He saith--'you I have called friends, for all things that I

have heard from My Father, I have made known unto you.' Wherefore, as

if we all at once saw one stooping down from yonder heaven, and

promising to tell us truly of things there, we should all flock to

listen to him, so let us now dispose ourselves. For it is from up

there that this man speaks down to us. And the fisherman is not

carried away by the whirling current of his own exuberant verbosity;

but all that he utters is with the steadfast accuracy of truth, and as

if he stood upon a rock he budges not. All time is his witness. Seest

thou the boldness, and the great authority of his words! how he utters

nothing by way of doubtful conjecture, but all demonstratively, as if

passing sentence. Very lofty is this Apostle, and full of dogmas, and

lingers over them more than over other things!"[93] This admirable

passage, with its fresh and noble enthusiasm, nowhere reminds us of

the glacial subtleties of the schools. It is the utterance of an

expositor who spoke the language in which his master wrote, and

breathed the same spiritual atmosphere. It is scarcely less true of

the Epistle than of the Gospel of St. John.

Here also "he is full of dogmas," here again he is the theologian of

the Church. But we are not to estimate the amount of dogma merely by

the number of words in which it is expressed. Dogma, indeed, is not

really composed of isolated texts--as pollen showered from conifers

and germs scattered from mosses, accidentally brought together and

compacted, are found upon chemical analysis to make up certain lumps

of coal. It is primary and structural. The Divinity and Incarnation of

Jesus pervade the First Epistle. Its whole structure is

_Trinitarian_.[94] It contains two of the three great three-word

dogmatic utterances of the New Testament about the nature of God (the

first being in the fourth Gospel)--"God is Spirit," "God is light,"

"God is love." The chief dogmatic statements of the Atonement are

found in these few chapters. "The blood of Jesus His Son cleanseth us

from all sin." "We have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the

Righteous." "He is the propitiation for the whole world." "God loved

us, and sent His Son the propitiation for our sins." Where the Apostle

passes on to deal with the spiritual life, he once more "is full of

dogmas," _i.e._, of eternal self-evidenced oracular sentences, spoken

as if "down from heaven," or by one "whose foot is upon a

rock,"--apparently identical propositions, all-inclusive, the dogmas

of moral and spiritual life, as those upon the Trinity, the

Incarnation, the Atonement, are of strictly theological truth. A

further characteristic of St. John as a sacred writer in his Epistle

is, that he appears to indicate throughout the moral and spiritual

conditions which were necessary for receiving the Gospel with which he

endowed the Church as the life of their life. These conditions are

three. The first is _spirituality_, submission to the teaching of the

Spirit, that they may know by it the meaning of the words of

Jesus--the "anointing" of the Holy Ghost, which is ever "teaching all

things" that He said.[95] The second condition is _purity_, at least,

the continuing effort after self-purification which is incumbent even

upon those who have received the great pardon.[96] This involves the

following in life's daily walk of the One perfect life-walk,[97] the

imitation of that which is supremely good,[98] "incarnated in an

actual earthly career." All must be purity, or effort after purity, on

the side of those who would read aright the Gospel of the immaculate

Lamb of God. The third condition for such readers is love--_charity_.

When he comes to deal fully with that great theme, the eagle of God

wheels far out of sight. In the depths of His Eternal Being, "God is

love."[99] Then this truth comes closer to us as believers. It stands

completely and for ever _manifested_ in its work _in us_,[100] because

"God _hath sent_" (a mission in the past, but with abiding

consequences)[101] "His Son, His only-begotten Son into the world,

that we may live through Him." Yet again, he rises higher from the

_manifestation_ of this love to the eternal and essential principle in

which it stands present for ever. "In this _is_ the love, not that we

loved God, but that God loved us, and once for all sent His Son a

propitiation for our sins."[102] Then follows the manifestation of

_our_ love. "If God so loved us, we also are bound to love one

another." Do we think it strange that St. John does not first draw the

lesson--"if God so loved us, we also are bound to love God"? It has

been in his heart all along, but he utters it in his own way, in the

solemn pathetic question--"he that loveth not his brother whom he

hath seen, God whom he hath not seen how can he love?"[103] Yet once

more he sums up the creed in a few short words. "We have believed the

love that God hath in us."[104] Truly and deeply has it been said that

this creed of the heart, suffused with the softest tints and sweetest

colours, goes to the root of all heresies upon the Incarnation,

whether in St. John's time or later. That God should give up His Son

by sending Him forth in humanity; that the Word made flesh should

humble Himself to the death upon the cross, the Sinless offer Himself

for sinners, this is what heresy cannot bring itself to understand. It

is the excess of such love which makes it incredible. "We have

believed the love" is the whole faith of a Christian man. It is St.

John's creed in three words.[105]

Such are the chief characteristics of St. John as a sacred writer,

which may be traced in his Epistle. These characteristics of the

author imply corresponding characteristics of the man. He who states

with such inevitable precision, with such noble and self-contained

enthusiasm, the great dogmas of the Christian faith, the great laws of

the Christian life, must himself have entirely believed them. He who

insists upon these conditions in the readers of his Gospel, must

himself have aimed at, and possessed, spirituality, purity, and love.

II.

We proceed to look at the First Epistle as a picture of the soul of

its author.

(1) His was a life free from the dominion of wilful and habitual sin

of any kind. "Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin, and he

cannot continue sinning." "Whosoever abideth in Him sinneth not;

whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him, neither known Him." A man so

entirely true, if conscious to himself of any reigning sin, dare not

have deliberately written these words.

(2) But if St. John's was a life free from subjection to any form of

the power of sin, he shows us that sanctity is not sinlessness, in

language which it is alike unwise and unsafe to attempt to explain

away. "If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves." "If we

say that we have not sinned and are not sinners, we make Him a liar."

But so long as we do not fall back into darkness, the blood of Jesus

is ever purifying us from all sin. This he has written that the

fulness of the Christian life may be realised in believers; that each

step of their walk may follow the blessed footprints of the most holy

life; that each successive act of a consecrated existence may be free

from sin.[106] And yet, if any fail in some such single act,[107] if

he swerve, for a moment, from the "true tenour" of the course which he

is shaping, there is no reason to despair. Beautiful humility of this

pure and lofty soul! How tenderly, with what lowly graciousness he

places himself among those who have and who need an Advocate. "Mark

John's humility," cries St. Augustine; "he says not '_ye_ have,' nor

'ye have _me_,' nor even '_ye_ have Christ.' But he puts forward

Christ, not himself; and he says '_we_ have,' not '_ye_ have,' thus

placing himself in the rank of sinners."[108] Nor does St. John cover

himself under the subterfuges by which men at different times have

tried to get rid of a truth so humiliating to spiritual

pride--sometimes by asserting that they so stand accepted in Christ

that no sin is accounted to them for such; sometimes by pleading

personal exemption for themselves as believers.

This Epistle stands alone in the New Testament in being addressed to

two generations--one of which after conversion had grown old in a

Christian atmosphere, whilst the other had been educated from the

cradle under the influences of the Christian Church. It is therefore

natural that such a letter should give prominence to the constant need

of pardon. It certainly does not speak so much of the great initial

pardon,[109] as of the continuing pardons needed by human frailty. In

dwelling upon pardon once given, upon sanctification once begun, men

are possibly apt to forget the pardon that is daily wanting, the

purification that is never to cease. We are to walk daily from pardon

to pardon, from purification to purification. Yesterday's surrender of

self to Christ may grow ineffectual if it be not renewed to-day. This

is sometimes said to be a humiliating view of the Christian life.

Perhaps so--but it is the view of the Church, which places in its

offices a daily confession of sin; of St. John in this Epistle; nay,

of Him who teaches us, after our prayers for bread day by day, to pray

for a daily forgiveness. This may be more humiliating, but it is safer

teaching than that which proclaims a pardon to be appropriated in a

moment for all sins past, present, and to come.

This humility may be traced incidentally in other regions of the

Christian life. Thus he speaks of the possibility at least of his

being among those who might "shrink with shame from Christ in His

coming." He does not disdain to write as if, in hours of spiritual

depression, there were tests by which he too might need to lull and

"persuade his heart before God."[110]

(3) St. John again has a boundless faith in prayer. It is the key put

into the child's hand by which he may let himself into the house, and

come into his Father's presence when he will, at any hour of the night

or day. And prayer made according to the conditions which God has laid

down is never quite lost. The particular thing asked for may not

indeed be given; but the substance of the request, the holier wish,

the better purpose underlying its weakness and imperfection, never

fails to be granted.[111]

(4) All but superficial readers must perceive that in the writings and

character of St. John there is from time to time a tonic and wholesome

_severity_. Art and modern literature have agreed to bestow upon the

Apostle of love the features of a languid and inert tenderness. It is

forgotten that St. John was the son of thunder; that he could once wish

to bring down fire from heaven; and that the natural character is

transfigured not inverted by grace. The Apostle uses great plainness of

speech. For him a lie is a lie, and darkness is never courteously called

light. He abhors and shudders at those heresies which rob the soul first

of Christ, and then of God.[112] Those who undermine the Incarnation

are for him not interesting and original speculators, but "lying

prophets." He underlines his warnings against such men with his roughest

and blackest pencil mark. "Whoso sayeth to him 'good speed' hath

fellowship with his _works_, those wicked _works_"[113]--for such heresy

is not simply one work, but a series of works. The schismatic prelate or

pretender Diotrephes may "babble;" but his babblings are wicked words

for all that, and are in truth the "works which he is doing."

The influence of every great Christian teacher lasts long beyond the day

of his death. It is felt in a general tone and spirit, in a special

appropriation of certain parts of the creed, in a peculiar method of the

Christian life. This influence is very discernible in the remains of two

disciples of St. John,[114] Ignatius and Polycarp. In writing to the

Ephesians, Ignatius does not indeed explicitly refer to St. John's

Epistle, as he does to that of St. Paul to the Ephesians. But he draws

in a few bold lines a picture of the Christian life which is imbued with

the very spirit of St. John. The character which the Apostle loved was

quiet and real; we feel that his heart is not with "him that

sayeth."[115] So Ignatius writes--"it is better to keep silence, and yet

to _be_, than to talk and _not to be_. It is good to teach if 'he that

sayeth doeth.' He who has gotten to himself the word of Jesus truly is

able to hear the silence of Jesus also, so that he may _act_ through

that which he _speaks_, and _be known_ through the things wherein he is

_silent_. Let us therefore do all things as in His presence who dwelleth

in us, that we may be His temple, and that He may be in us our God."

This is the very spirit of St. John. We feel in it at once his severe

common sense and his glorious mysticism.

We must add that the influence of St. John may be traced in matters

which are often considered alien to his simple and spiritual piety. It

seems that Episcopacy was consolidated and extended under his fostering

care. The language of Ignatius (probably his disciple) upon the

necessity of union with the Episcopate is, after all conceivable

deductions, of startling strength. A few decades could not possibly have

removed Ignatius so far from the lines marked out to him by St. John as

he must have advanced, if this teaching upon Church government was a new

departure. And with this conception of Church government we must

associate other matters also. The immediate successors of St. John, who

had learned from his lips, held deep sacramental views. The Eucharist is

"the bread of God, the bread of heaven, the bread of life, the flesh of

Christ." Again Ignatius cries--"desire to use one Eucharist, for one is

the flesh of our Lord Jesus Christ, and one cup unto oneness of His

blood, one altar, as one Bishop, with the Presbytery and deacons."[117]

Hints are not wanting that sweetness and life in public worship derived

inspiration from the same quarter. The language of Ignatius is deeply

tinged with his passion for _music_.[118] The beautiful story, how he

set down, immediately after a vision, the melody to which he had heard

the angels chanting, and caused it to be used in his church at Antioch,

attests the impression of enthusiasm and care for sacred song which was

associated with the memory of Ignatius.[119] Nor can we be surprised at

these features of Ephesian Christianity, when we remember who was the

founder of those Churches. He was the writer of _three_ books. These

books come to us with a continuous living interpretation of more than

seventeen centuries of historical Christianity. From the fourth Gospel

in large measure has arisen the sacramental instinct, from the

Apocalypse the æsthetic instinct, which has been certainly exaggerated

both in the East and West. The third and sixth chapters of St. John's

Gospel permeate every baptismal and eucharistic office. Given an

inspired book which represents the worship of the redeemed as one of

perfect majesty and beauty, men may well in the presence of noble

churches and stately liturgies, adopt the words of our great English

Christian poet--

"things which shed upon the outward frame

Of worship glory and grace--which who shall blame

That ever look'd to heaven for final rest?"

The third book in this group of writings supplies the sweet and quiet

spirituality which is the foundation of every regenerate nature.

Such is the image of the soul which is presented to us by St. John

himself. It is based upon a firm conviction of the nature of God, of

the Divinity, the Incarnation, the Atonement of our Lord. It is

spiritual. It is pure, or being purified. The highest theological

truth--"God is Love"--supremely _realised_ in the Holy Trinity,

supremely manifested in the sending forth of God's only Son, becomes

the law of its common social life, made visible in gentle patience, in

giving and forgiving.[120] Such a life will be free from the

degradation of habitual sin. Yet it is at best an imperfect

representation of the one perfect life.[121] It needs unceasing

purification by the blood of Jesus, the continual advocacy of One who

is sinless. Such a nature, however full of charity, will not be weakly

indulgent to vital error or to ambitious schism;[122] for it knows the

value of truth and unity. It feels the sweetness of a calm conscience,

and of a simple belief in the efficacy of prayer. Over every such

life--over all the grief that may be, all the temptation that must

be--is the purifying hope of a great Advent, the ennobling assurance

of a perfect victory, the knowledge that if we continue true to the

principle of our new birth we are safe. And our safety is, not that we

keep ourselves, but that we are kept by arms which are as soft as

love, and as strong as eternity.[123]

These Epistles are full of instruction and of comfort for us, just

because they are written in an atmosphere of the Church which, in one

respect at least, resembles our own. There is in them no reference

whatever to a continuance of miraculous powers, to raptures, or to

extraordinary phenomena. All in them which is supernatural continues

even to this day, in the possession of an inspired record, in

sacramental grace, in the pardon and holiness, the peace and strength

of believers. The apocryphal "Acts of John" contain some fragments of

real beauty almost lost in questionable stories and prolix declamation.

It is probably not literally true that when St. John in early life

wished to make himself a home, his Lord said to him, "I have need of

thee, John;" that that thrilling voice once came to him, wafted over the

still darkened sea--"John, hadst thou not been Mine, I would have

suffered thee to marry."[124] But the Epistle shows us much more

effectually that he had a pure heart and virgin will. It is scarcely

probable that the son of Zebedee ever drained a cup of hemlock with

impunity; but he bore within him an effectual charm against the poison

of sin.[125] We of this nineteenth century may smile when we read that

he possessed the power of turning leaves into gold, of transmuting

pebbles into jewels, of fusing shattered gems into one; but he carried

with him wherever he went that most excellent gift of charity, which

makes the commonest things of earth radiant with beauty.[126] He may

not actually have praised his Master during his last hour in words which

seem to us not quite unworthy even of such lips--"Thou art the only

Lord, the root of immortality, the fountain of incorruption. Thou who

madest our rough wild nature soft and quiet, who deliveredst me from the

imagination of the moment, and didst keep me safe within the guard of

that which abideth for ever." But such thoughts in life or death were

never far from him for whom Christ was the Word and the Life; who knew

that while "the world passeth away and the lust thereof, he that doeth

the will of God abideth for ever."[127]

May we so look upon this image of the Apostle's soul in his Epistle

that we may reflect something of its brightness! May we be able to

think, as we turn to this threefold assertion of knowledge--"_I_ know

something of the security of this keeping.[128] _I_ know something of

the sweetness of being in the Church, that isle of light surrounded by

a darkened world.[129] _I_ know something of the beauty of the perfect

human life recorded by St. John, something of the continued presence

of the Son of God, something of the new sense which He gives, that we

may know Him who is the Very God."[130] Blessed exchange not to be

vaunted loudly, but spoken reverently in our own hearts--the exchange

of we, for I. There is much divinity in these pronouns.[131]

NOTES.

NOTE A.

1 John iv. 8, 9, 10. Modern theological schools of a Calvinistic bias

have tended to overlook the conception of the nature of God as

essential or substantive Love, and to consider love only as

_manifested_ in redemption. Socinianising interpreters understand the

proposition to mean that God is simply and exclusively benevolent. (On

the inadequacy of this, see Butler, _Anal._, Part I., ch. iii., and

Dissertation II. of the Nature of Virtue.) The highest Christian

thought has ever recognised that the proposition 'God is Love'

necessarily involves the august truth that God if _sole_ is not

_solitary_. ("Credimur et confitemur omnipotentem Trinitatem--unum

Deum _solum_ non _solitarium_." Concil. Tolet., vi. 1.) "Let it not be

supposed," said St. Bernard, "that I here account Love as an attribute

or accident, but as the Divine essence--no new doctrine, seeing that

St. John saith 'God is love.' It may rightly be said both that _Love_

is _God_, and that love is _the gift of God_. For Love gives love; the

essential Love gives that which is accidental. When Love signifies the

Giver, it is the name of His essence; when it signifies His gift, it

is the name of a quality or attribute." (_S. Bernard., de dil. Deo_,

xii.). "This is nobly said. God is love. Thus love is the eternal law

whereby all things were created and are governed--wherewith He who is

the law of all things is unto Himself His own law, and that a law of

love--wherewith He bindeth His Trinity into Unity." (_Thomassin. Dogm.

Theol._, lib. iii., 23.)

NOTE B.

ἡ ῥιζα της αθανασιας και ἡ πηγη της αφθαρσιας· ὁ την ερημον και

αγριωθεισαν φυσιν ἡμων ηρεμον και ἡσυχιον ποιησας, ὁ της προσκαιρου

φαντασιας ῥυσαμενος με και εις την αει μενουσαν φρουρησας (_Acta

Johannis_, 21). These sentences are surely not without freshness and

power. One other passage is worth translating, because it seems to

have just that imaginative cast which makes the Greek Liturgies, like

so much else that is Greek, stand midway between the East and West;

and because it apparently refers to St. John's Gospel. "Jesus! Thou

who hast woven this coronal with Thy plaiting, who hast blended these

many flowers into the flower of Thy presence, not blown through by the

winds of any storm; Thou who hast scattered thickly abroad the seed of

these words of Thine"--(_Acta Johannis_, 17).

FOOTNOTES:

[87] Apoc. xxi. 19, 20.

[88] 1 John i. 6, cf. John iii. 21. In the LXX. the phrase is only

found once, and is then applied to God: αληθειαν εποιησας (Neh. ix.

33). It is characteristic of St. John's style that _doing a lie_ is

found in Apoc. xxi. 27, xxii. 15.

[89] Apoc. xxii. 8.

[90] 1 John v. 18.

[91] Ibid. 19.

[92] ἡκει, "has come,--and is here."--Ibid. 20.

[93] _S. Joann. Chrysost., in Johan._, Homil. iii., Tom. viii., 25,

36, Edit. Migne.

[94] Huther, while rejecting with all impartial critics the

interpolation (1 John v. 7), writes thus: "when we embrace in one

survey the contents of the Epistle as a whole, it is certainly easy to

_adapt the conception_ of the three Heavenly witnesses to one place

after another in the document. But it does not follow that the mention

of it just here would be in its right place." (_Handbuch über der drei

Briefe des Johannes._ Dr. J. E. Huther.)

[95] 1 John ii. 20.

[96] 1 John i. 7, iii. 3.

[97] 1 John ii. 6.

[98] "Imitate not that which is evil, but that which is good" (3 John

12). A comparison of this verse with John xxi. 24 would lead to the

supposition that the writer of the letter is quoting the Gospel, and

assumes an intimate knowledge of it on the part of Caius. See

Discourse XVII. Part ii. of this vol.

[99] See note A at the end of this discourse.

[100] 1 John iv. 9.

[101] απεσταλκεν.

[102] απεστειλεν.

[103] 1 John iv. 20.

[104] 1 John iv. 16.

[105] πεπιστευκαμεν την αγαπην, 1 John iv. 16.

[106] For the aor. conj. in this place as distinguished from the pres.

conj. cf. John v. 20, 23, vi. 28, 29, 30. Professor Westcott's refined

scholarship corrects the error of many commentators, "that the Apostle

is simply warning us not to draw encouragement for license from the

doctrine of forgiveness." The tense is decisive against this, the

thought is of the single _act_ not of the _state_.

[107] εαν τις ἁμαρτη, 1 John ii. 1.

[108] _In Epist. Johann._, Tract. I.

[109] 1 John ii. 12, is, of course, an important exception.

[110] 1 John iii. 19, 20.

[111] See Prof. Westcott's valuable note on 1 John v. 15. The very

things literally asked for would be τα αιτηθεντα, not τα αιτηματα.

[112] 2 John 11.

[113] 3 John 10.

[114] _Mart. Ignat._, i. _S. Hieron, de Script. Eccles._, xvii.

[115] ὁ λεγων, 1 John ii. 4, 6, 9.

[116] _Ignat. Epist. ad Ephes._, xv., cf. 1 John ii. 14, iv. 9, 17,

iii. 2.

[117] _S. Ignat. Epist. ad Philad._, iv.; cf. _Epist. ad Smyrn._,

vii.; _Epist. ad Ephes._, xx.

[118] The most elaborate passage in the Ignatian remains is probably

this. "Your Presbytery is fitted together harmoniously with the Bishop

as chords with the cithara. Hereby in your symphonious love Jesus

Christ is sung in concord. Taking your part man by man become one

choir, that being harmoniously accordant in your like-mindedness,

having received in unity the chromatic music of God (χρωμα Θεου

λαβοντες), ye may sing with one voice through Jesus Christ unto the

Father."--_Epist. ad Ephes._, iv. The same image is differently

applied, _Epist. ad Philad._, i.

[119] The story is given by Socrates. (_H. E._, vi. 8.)

[120] 1 John iv. 7, 12.

[121] 1 John ii. 6, 9, i. 7-10, ii. 1, 2.

[122] 1 John i. 7, ii. 2, iv. 3, 6; 2 John 7-11; 3 John 9, 10.

[123] 1 John iii. 19, v. 14, 15, iv. 2, 3, v. 4, 5, 18.

[124] These sentences do not go so far as the mischievous and

antiscriptural legend of later ascetic heretics, who marred the beauty

and the purpose of the miracle at Cana, by asserting that John was the

bridegroom, and that our Lord took him away from his bride. _Acta

Johannis_, XXI. _Act. Apost. Apoc._, Tisch., 275).

[125] This legend no doubt arose from the promise--"if they drink any

deadly thing it shall not hurt them" (Mark xvi. 18).

"Virus fidens sorbuit." Adam of St. Victor, _Seq._ XXXIII.

[126]

"Aurum hic de frondibus,

Gemmas de silicibus,

Fractis de fragminibus,

Fecit firmas."--_Ibid._

There is something interesting in the persistency of legends about St.

John's power over gems, when connected with the passage, flashing all

over with the light of precious stones, whose exquisite disposition is

the wonder of lapidaries. Apoc. xxi, 18, 22.

[127] See note B at the end of the Discourse.

[128] 1 John v. 18.

[129] Ibid. v. 19.

[130] Ibid. v. 20.

[131] Said by Luther of Psalm xxii. 1.

PART II.

SOME GENERAL RULES FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF THE FIRST EPISTLE OF ST.

JOHN.

I. SUBJECT MATTER.

(1) The _Epistle_ is to be read through with constant reference to the

_Gospel_. In what _precise form_ the former is related to the latter

(whether as a preface or as an appendix, as a spiritual commentary or

an encyclical) critics may decide. But there is a vital and constant

connection. The two documents not only touch each other in thought,

but _interpenetrate_ each other; and the Epistle is constantly

_suggesting_ questions which the Gospel only can answer, _e.g._, 1

John i. 1, cf. John i. 1-14; 1 John v. 9, "witness of men," cf. John

i. 15-36, 41, 45, 49, iii. 2, 27-36, iv. 29-42, vi. 68, 69, vii. 46,

ix. 38, xi. 27, xviii. 38, xix. 5, 6, xx. 28.

(2) Such eloquence of _style_ as St. John possesses is _real_ rather

than _verbal_. The interpreter must look not only at the words

themselves, but at that which _precedes_ and _follows_; above all he

must fix his attention not only upon the _verbal expression_ of the

thought, but upon the _thought itself_. For the formal connecting link

is not rarely omitted, and must be supplied by the devout and candid

diligence of the reader. The "root below the stream" can only be traced

by our bending over the water until it becomes translucent to us.

_E.g._ 1 John i. 7, 8. Ver. 7, "the root below the stream" is a

question of this kind, which naturally arises from reading ver.

6--"must it be said that the sons of light need a constant cleansing

by the blood of Jesus, which implies a constant guilt"? Some such

thought is the latent root of connection. The answer is supplied by

the following verse. ["It is so" for] "if we say that we have no sin,"

etc. Cf. also iii. 16, 17, xiv. 8, 9, 10, 11, v. 3 (ad. fin.), 4.

II. LANGUAGE.

1. _Tenses._

In the New Testament generally tenses are employed very much in the same

sense, and with the same general accuracy, as in other Greek authors.

The so-called "enallage temporum," or perpetual and convenient Hebraism,

has been proved by the greatest Hebrew scholars to be no Hebraism at

all. But it is one of the simple secrets of St. John's quiet thoughtful

power, that he uses tenses with the most rigorous precision.

(_a_) The _Present_ of continuing uninterrupted action, _e.g._, i. 8,

ii. 6, iii. 7, 8, 9.

Hence the so-called _substantized_ participle with article ὁ has in St.

John the sense of the continuous and constitutive temper and conduct of

any man, the principle of his moral and spiritual life--_e.g._, ὁ λεγων,

he who is ever vaunting, ii. 4; πας ὁ μισων, every one the abiding

principle of whose life is hatred, iii. 15; πας ὁ αγαπων, every one the

abiding principle of whose life is love, iv. 7.

The Infin. Present is generally used to express an action now in

course of performing or _continued_ in itself or in its results, or

_frequently repeated--e.g._, 1 John ii. 6, iii. 8, 9, v. 18. (Winer,

_Gr. of N. T. Diction_, Part 3, xliv., 348).

(_b_) The _Aorist_.

This tense is generally used either of a thing occurring only once,

which does not admit, or at least does not require, the notion of

continuance and perpetuity; or of something which is brief and as it

were only momentary in duration (Stallbaum, _Plat. Enthyd._, p. 140).

This limitation or isolation of the predicated action is most

accurately indicated by the usual form of this tense in Greek. The

aorist verb is encased between the augment ε- past time, and the

adjunct σ- future time, _i.e._, the act is fixed on within certain

limits of previous and consequent time (Donaldson, _Gr. Gr._, 427, B.

2). The aorist is used with most significant accuracy in the Epistle

of St. John, _e.g._, ii. 6, 11, 27, iv. 10, v. 18.

(_c_) The _Perfect_.

The Perfect denotes action absolutely past which lasts on in its

effects. "The idea of completeness conveyed by the aorist must be

distinguished from that of a state consequent on an act, which is the

meaning of the perfect" (Donaldson, _Gr. Gr._, 419). Careful

observation of this principle is the key to some of the chief

difficulties of the Epistle (iii. 9, v. 4, 18).

(2) The form of _accessional parallelism_ is to be carefully noticed.

The second member is always in advance of the first; and a third is

occasionally introduced in advance of the second, denoting the highest

point to which the thought is thrown up by the tide of thought,

_e.g._, 1 John ii. 4, 5, 6, v. 11, v. 27.

(3) The _preparatory touch_ upon the chord which announces a theme to be

amplified afterwards,--_e.g._, ii. 29, iii. 9--iv. 7, v. 3, 4; iii.

21--v. 14, ii. 20, iii. 24, iv. 3, v. 6, 8, ii. 13, 14, iv. 4--v. 4, 5.

(4) One secret of St. John's simple and solemn rhetoric consists in an

_impressive change_ in the order in which a leading word is used,

_e.g._, 1 John ii. 24, iv. 20.

These principles carefully applied will be the best commentary upon

the letter of the Apostle, to whom not only when his subject is--

"De Deo Deum verum

Alpha et Omega, Patrem rerum";

but when he unfolds the principles of our spiritual life, we may apply

Adam of St. Victor's powerful and untranslatable line,

"Solers scribit idiota."

SECTION I.

GREEK TEXT. LATIN.

Ὁ ἩΝ απ' αρχης, ὁ Quod fuit ab initio,

ακηκοαμεν, ὁ ἑωρακαμεν quod audivimus, et

τοις οφθαλμοις ἡμων, vidimus oculis nostris,

ὁ εθεασαμεθα, και αι quod perspeximus, et

χειρες ἡμων εψηλαφησαν manus nostræ temtaverunt,

περι του λογου της ζωης· de Verbo vitæ;

και ἡ ζωη εφανερωθη, et vita manifestata

και ἑωρακαμεν, και est, et vidimus et testamur,

μαρτυρουμεν, και απαγγελλομεν et adnuntiamus

ὑμιν την vobis vitam æternam,

ζωην την αιωνιον, ἡτις quæ erat apud Patrem,

ην προς τον πατερα, et apparuit nobis: quod

και εφανερωθη ἡμιν· vidimus et audivimus,

ὁ ἑωρακαμεν και ακηκοαμεν, et adnuntiamus vobis,

απαγγελλομεν ut et vos societatem

ὑμιν, ἱνα και ὑμεις habeatis nobiscum, et

κοινωνιαν εχητε μεθ' societas nostra sit cum

ἡμων· και ἡ κοινωνια Patre, et Filio eius Iesu

δε ἡ ἡμετερα μετα του Christo. Et hæc scripsimus

πατρος και μετα του vobis ut gaudium

υιου αυτου Ιησου nostrum sit plenum.

Χριστου· και ταυτα

γραφομεν ὑμιν, ἱνα ἡ

χαρα ὑμων ἡ πεπληρωμενη.

AUTHORISED VERSION. REVISED VERSION.

That which was from That which was from

the beginning, which the beginning, that

we have heard, which which we have heard,

we have seen with our that which we have

eyes, which we have seen with our eyes,

looked upon, and our that which we beheld,

hands have handled, and our hands handled,

of the Word of Life; concerning the Word

(for the life was of life (and the life was

manifested, and we manifested, and we

have seen _it_, and bear have seen, and bear

witness, and show unto witness, and declare

you that eternal life, unto you the life, the

which was with the eternal _life_, which was

Father, and was manifested with the Father, and

unto us;) that was manifested unto

which we have seen us); that which we

and heard declare we have seen and heard

unto you, that ye declare we unto you

also may have fellowship also, that ye also may

with us: and truly have fellowship with

our fellowship _is_ with us: yea, and our fellowship

the Father, and with is with the

his Son Jesus Christ. Father, and with his

And these things write Son Jesus Christ: and

we unto you, that your these things we write,

joy may be full. that our joy may be

fulfilled.

ANOTHER RENDERING.

That which was ever

from the beginning,

that which we have

heard, that which we

have seen with our

eyes, that which we

gazed upon, and our

hands handled--_I

speak_ concerning the

Word who is the

Life--and the Life

was manifested, and

we have seen, and

bear witness, and declare

unto you the

life, the eternal _life_,

as being that which

was ever with the

Father, and was manifested

unto us: that

which we have seen

and heard declare we

unto you, that ye also

may have fellowship

with us: yea, and that

fellowship, which is

our _fellowship_, is with

the Father and with

His Son Jesus Christ.

And these things write

we unto you, that your

joy may be fulfilled.

DISCOURSE I.

_ANALYSIS AND THEORY OF ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL._

"Of the Word of Life."--1 JOHN i. 1.

In the opening verses of this Epistle we have a sentence whose ample

and prolonged prelude has but one parallel in St. John's

writings.[132] It is, as an old divine says, "prefaced and brought in

with more magnificent ceremony than any passage in Scripture."

The very emotion and enthusiasm with which it is written, and the

sublimity of the exordium as a whole, tends to make the highest sense

also the most natural sense. Of what or of whom does St. John speak in

the phrase "concerning the Word of Life," or "the Word who is the

Life"? The neuter "that which" is used for the masculine--"He

who"--according to St. John's practice of employing the neuter

comprehensively when a collective whole is to be expressed. The phrase

"from the beginning," taken by itself, might no doubt be employed to

signify the beginning of Christianity, or of the ministry of Christ.

But even viewing it as entirely isolated from its context of language

and circumstance, it has a greater claim to be looked upon as _from

eternity_ or _from the beginning of the creation_. Other

considerations are decisive in favour of the last interpretation.

(1) We have already adverted to the lofty and transcendental tone of

the whole passage, elevating as it does each clause by the

irresistible upward tendency of the whole sentence. The climax and

resting place cannot stop short of the bosom of God. (2) But again, we

must also bear in mind that the Epistle is everywhere to be read with

the Gospel before us, and the language of the Epistle to be connected

with that of the Gospel. The proœmium of the Epistle is the subjective

version of the objective historical point of view which we find at the

close of the preface to the Gospel. "The Word was made flesh and dwelt

among us;" so St. John begins his sentence in the Gospel with a

statement of an historical fact. But he proceeds, "and we delightedly

beheld His glory;" that is a statement of the personal impression

attested by his own consciousness and that of other witnesses. But let

us note carefully that in the Epistle, which is in subjective relation

to the Gospel, this process is exactly reversed. The Apostle begins

with the personal impression; pauses to affirm the reality of the many

proofs in the realm of fact of that which produced this impression

through the senses upon the conceptions and emotions of those who were

brought into contact with the Saviour; and then returns to the

subjective impression from which he had originally started. (3) Much

of the language in this passage is inconsistent with our understanding

by the Word the first announcement of the Gospel preaching. One might

of course speak of hearing the commencement of the Gospel message, due

surely not of seeing and handling it. (4) It is a noteworthy fact that

the Gospel and the Apocalypse begin with the mention of the personal

Word. This may well lead us to expect that Logos should be used in the

same sense in the proœmium of the great Epistle by the same author.

We conclude then that when St. John here speaks of the Word of Life,

he refers to something higher again than the preaching of life, and

that he has in view both the manifestation of the life which has taken

place in our humanity, and Him who is personally at once the Word and

the Life.[133] The proœmium may be thus paraphrased. "That which in

all its collective influence was from the beginning as understood by

Moses, by Solomon, and Micah;[134] which we have first and above all

heard in divinely human utterances, but which we have also seen with

these very eyes; which we gazed upon with the full and entranced sight

that delights in the object contemplated;[135] and which these hands

handled reverentially at His bidding.[136] I speak all this concerning

the Word who is also the Life."

Tracts and sheets are often printed in our day with anthologies of

texts which are supposed to contain the very essence of the Gospel.

But the sweetest scents, it is said, are not distilled exclusively

from flowers, for the flower is but an exhalation. The seeds, the

leaf, the stem, the very bark should be macerated, because they

contain the odoriferous substance in minute sacs. So the purest

Christian doctrine is distilled, not only from a few exquisite flowers

in a textual anthology, but from the whole substance, so to speak, of

the message. Now it will be observed that at the beginning of the

Epistle which accompanied the fourth Gospel, our attention is directed

not to a sentiment, but to a fact and to a Person. In the collections

of texts to which reference has been made, we should probably never

find two brief passages which may not unjustly be considered to

concentrate the essence of the scheme of salvation more nearly than

any others. "The Word was made flesh." "Concerning the Word of Life

(and that Life was once manifested, and we have seen and consequently

are witnesses and announce to you from Him who sent us that Life, that

eternal Life whose it is to have been in eternal relation with the

Father, and manifested to us); That which we have seen and heard

declare we from Him who sent us unto you, to the end that you too may

have fellowship with us."

It would be disrespectful to the theologian of the New Testament to

pass by the great dogmatic term never, so far as we are told, applied

by our Lord to Himself, but with which St. John begins each of his

three principal writings--THE WORD.[137]

Such mountains of erudition have been heaped over this term that it has

become difficult to discover the buried thought. The Apostle adopted a

word which was already in use in various quarters simply because if,

from the nature of the case necessarily inadequate,[138] it was yet more

suitable than any other. He also, as profound ancient thinkers

conceived, looked into the depths of the human mind, into the first

principles of that which is the chief distinction of man from the lower

creation--language. The human word, these thinkers taught, is twofold;

inner and outer--now as the manifestation to the mind itself of

unuttered thought, now as a part of language uttered to others. The word

as signifying unuttered thought, the mould in which it exists in the

mind, illustrates the eternal relation of the Father to the Son. The

word as signifying uttered thought illustrates the relation as conveyed

to man by the Incarnation. "No man hath seen God at any time; the only

begotten God which is in the bosom of the Father He interpreted Him."

For the theologian of the Church Jesus is thus the Word; because He had

His being from the Father in a way which presents some analogy to the

human word, which is sometimes the inner vesture, sometimes the outward

utterance of thought--sometimes the human thought in that language

without which man cannot think, sometimes the speech whereby the speaker

interprets it to others. Christ is the Word Whom out of the fulness of

His thought and being the Father has eternally inspoken and outspoken

into personal existence.[139]

One too well knows that such teaching as this runs the risk of

appearing uselessly subtle and technical, but its practical value will

appear upon reflection. Because it gives us possession of the point of

view from which St. John himself surveys, and from which he would have

the Church contemplate, the history of the life of our Lord. And

indeed for that life the theology of the Word, _i.e._, of the

Incarnation, is simply necessary.

For we must agree with M. Renan so far at least as this, that a great

life, even as the world counts greatness, is an organic whole with an

underlying vitalising idea; which must be construed as such, and

cannot be adequately rendered by a mere narration of facts. Without

this unifying principle the facts will be not only incoherent but

inconsistent. There must be a point of view from which we can embrace

the life as one. The great test here, as in art, is the formation of

a living, consistent, unmutilated whole.[140]

Thus a general point of view (if we are to use modern language easily

capable of being misunderstood we must say a theory) is wanted of the

Person, the work, the character of Christ. The synoptical Evangelists

had furnished the Church with the narrative of His earthly origin. St.

John in his Gospel and Epistle, under the guidance of the Spirit,

endowed it with the theory of His Person.

Other points of view have been adopted, from the heresies of the early

ages to the speculations of our own. All but St. John's have failed to

co-ordinate the elements of the problem. The earlier attempts essayed

to read the history upon the assumption that He was merely human or

merely divine. They tried in their weary round to unhumanise or

undeify the God-Man, to degrade the perfect Deity, to mutilate the

perfect Humanity--to present to the adoration of mankind a something

neither entirely human nor entirely divine, but an impossible mixture

of the two. The truth on these momentous subjects was fused under the

fires of controversy. The last centuries have produced theories less

subtle and metaphysical, but bolder and more blasphemous. Some have

looked upon Him as a pretender or an enthusiast. But the depth and

sobriety of His teaching upon ground where we are able to test it--the

texture of circumstantial word and work which will bear to be

inspected under any microscope or cross-examined by any

prosecutor--have almost shamed such blasphemy into respectful silence.

Others of later date admit with patronising admiration that the

martyr of Calvary is a saint of transcendent excellence. But if He who

called Himself Son of God was not much more than saint, He was

something less. Indeed He would have been something of three

characters; saint, visionary, pretender--at moments the Son of God in

His elevated devotion, at other times condescending to something of

the practice of the charlatan, His unparalleled presumption only

excused by His unparalleled success.

Now the point of view taken by St. John is the only one which is

possible or consistent--the only one which reconciles the humiliation

and the glory recorded in the Gospels, which harmonises the otherwise

insoluble contradictions that beset His Person and His work. One after

another, to the question, "what think ye of Christ?" answers are

attempted, sometimes angry, sometimes sorrowful, always confused. The

frank respectful bewilderment of the better Socinianism, the gay

brilliance of French romance, the heavy insolence of German criticism,

have woven their revolting or perplexed christologies. The Church

still points with a confidence, which only deepens as the ages pass,

to the enunciation of the theory of the Saviour's Person by St.

John--in his Gospel, "The Word was made flesh"--in his Epistle,

"concerning the Word of Life."

FOOTNOTES:

[132] See the noble and enthusiastic preface to the washing of the

disciples' feet (John xiii. 1, 2, 3).

[133] The phrase probably means the Logos, the Personal "Word who is

at once both the Word and the Life." For the double genitive, the

second almost appositional to the first, conf. John ii. 21, xi. 13.

This interpretation would seem to be that of Chrysostom. "If then the

Word is the Life; and if this Christ who is at once the Word and the

Life became flesh; then the Life became flesh." (_In Joan. Evang._ v.)

[134] Gen. i. 1; Prov. viii. 23; Micah v. 2.

[135] Cf. John vi. 36, 40. The word is applied by the angel to the

disciples gazing on the Ascension, Acts i. 11. The Transfiguration may

be here referred to. Such an incident as that in John vii. 37 attests

a vivid delighted remembrance of the Saviour's very attitude.

[136] Luke xxiv. 39; John xx. 27.

[137] Gospel i. 1-14; 1 John i. 1; Apoc. i. 9.

[138] "He hath a name written which _no one knoweth but He

Himself_,--and His name is called THE WORD OF GOD" (Apoc. xix. 12,

13). Gibbons' adroit italics may here be noted. "The Logos, TAUGHT in

the school of Alexandria BEFORE Christ 100--REVEALED to the Apostle

St. John, ANNO DOMINI, 97" (_Decline and Fall_, ch. xxi.). Just so

very probably--though whether St. John ever read a page of Philo or

Plato we have no means of knowing.

[139] The following table may be found useful:--

+------------------------------------------------------------------+

| THE WORD IN ST. JOHN IS OPPOSED. |

+------------------------------+----+------------------------------+

|(A) To the Gnostic Word, | |(A) Uncreated and Eternal. |

| created and temporal | as |"In the beginning was |

| | |the Word." |

+------------------------------+----+------------------------------+

|(B) To the Platonic Word, | |(B) Personal and Divine. |

| ideal and abstract | as |"The Word was God." |

| | |"He"--"His." |

+------------------------------+----+------------------------------+

|(C) To the Judaistic and | |(C) Creative and First Cause. |

|Philonic Word--the type | |"All things were made |

|and idea of God in | as |by Him." |

|creation ... | | |

+------------------------------+----+------------------------------+

|(D) To the Dualistic Word-- | |(D) Unique and Universally |

|limitedly and partially | |Creative. "Without Him |

|instrumental in creation. | as |was not anything made |

| | |that hath been made." |

+------------------------------+----+------------------------------+

|(E) To the Doketic Word-- | as |(E) Real and Permanent. "The |

|impalpable and visionary | |Word became flesh." |

+------------------------------+----+------------------------------+

[140] _Vie de Jesus_, Int. 4.

DISCOURSE II.

_ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL HISTORICAL NOT IDEOLOGICAL._

"That which we have heard."--1 JOHN i. 1.

Our argument so far has been that St. John's Gospel is dominated by a

central idea and by a theory which harmonises the great and many-sided

life which it contains, and which is repeated again at the beginning of

the Epistle in a form analogous to that in which it had been cast in the

proœmium of the Gospel--allowing for the difference between a history

and a document of a more subjective character moulded upon that history.

There is one objection to the accuracy, almost to the veracity, of a

life written from such a theory or point of view. It may disdain to be

shackled by the bondage of facts. It may become an essay in which

possibilities and speculations are mistaken for actual events, and

history is superseded by metaphysics. It may degenerate into a romance

or prose-poem; if the subject is religious, into a mystic effusion. In

the case of the fourth Gospel the cycles in which the narrative moves,

the unveiling as of the progress of a drama, are thought by some to

confirm the suspicion awakened by the point of view given in its

proœmium, and in the opening of the Epistle. The Gospel, it is said, is

_ideological_. To us it appears that those who have entered most deeply

into the spirit of St. John will most deeply feel the significance of

the two words which we place at the head of this discourse--"which we

have heard," "which we have seen with our very eyes," (which we

contemplated with entranced gaze) "which our hands have handled."

More truly than any other, St. John could say of this letter in the

words of an American poet:

"This is not a book--It is I!"

In one so true, so simple, so profound, so oracular, there is a

special reason for this prolonged appeal to the senses, and for the

place which is assigned to each. In the fact that _hearing_ stands

first, there is a reference to one characteristic of that Gospel to

which the Epistle throughout refers. Beyond the synoptical

Evangelists, St. John records the words of Jesus. The position which

_hearing_ holds in the sentence, above and prior to _sight_ and

_handling_, indicates the reverential estimation in which the Apostle

held his Master's teaching.[141] The expression places us on solid

historical ground, because it is a moral demonstration that one like

St. John would not have dared to invent whole discourses and place

them in the lips of Jesus. Thus in the "_we have heard_" there is a

guarantee of the sincerity of the report of the discourses, which

forms so large a proportion of the narrative that it practically

guarantees the whole Gospel.

On this accusation of ideology against St. John's Gospel, let us make

a further remark founded upon the Epistle.

It is said that the Gospel systematically subordinates chronological

order and historical sequence of facts to the necessity imposed by the

theory of the Word which stands in the forefront of the Epistle and

Gospel.

But mystic ideology, indifference to historical veracity as compared

with adherence to a conception or theory, is absolutely inconsistent

with that strong, simple, severe appeal to the validity of the

historical principle of belief upon sufficient evidence which pervades

St. John's writings. His Gospel is a tissue woven of many lines of

evidence. "Witness" stands in almost every page of that Gospel, and

indeed is found there nearly as often as in the whole of the rest of

the New Testament. The word occurs _ten_ times in five short verses of

the Epistle.[142] There is no possibility of mistaking this prolixity

of reiteration in a writer so simple and so sincere as our Apostle.

The theologian is an historian. He has no intention of sacrificing

history to dogma, and no necessity for doing so. His theory, and that

alone, harmonises his facts. His facts have passed in the domain of

human history, and have had that evidence of witness which proves that

they did so.

A few of the stories of the earliest ages of Christianity have ever been

repeated, and rightly so, as affording the most beautiful illustrations

of St. John's character, the most simple and truthful idea of the

impression left by his character and his work. His tender love for

souls, his deathless desire to promote mutual love among his people, are

enshrined in two anecdotes which the Church has never forgotten. It has

scarcely been noticed that a tradition of not much later date (at least

as old as Tertullian, born probably about A.D. 150) credits St. John

with a stern reverence for the accuracy of historical truth, and tells

us what, in the estimation of those who were near him in time, the

Apostle thought of the lawfulness of ideological religious romance. It

was said that a presbyter of Asia Minor confessed that he was the author

of certain apocryphal Acts of Paul and Thecla--probably the same strange

but unquestionably very ancient document with the same title which is

still preserved. The man's motive does not seem to have been selfish.

His work was apparently the composition of an ardent and romantic nature

passionately attracted by a saint so wonderful as St. Paul.[143] The

tradition went on to assert that St. John without hesitation degraded

this clerical romance-writer from his ministry. But the offence of the

Asiatic presbyter would have been light indeed compared with that of

the mendacious Evangelist, who could have deliberately fabricated

discourses and narrated miracles which he dared to attribute to the

Incarnate Son of God. The guilt of publishing to the Church apocryphal

Acts of Paul and Thecla would have paled before the crimson sin of

forging a Gospel.

These considerations upon St. John's prolonged and circumstantial

claim to personal acquaintance with the Word made flesh, confirmed by

every avenue of communication between man and man--and first in order

by the hearing of that sweet yet awful teaching--point to the fourth

Gospel again and again. And the simple assertion--"that which we have

heard"--accounts for one characteristic of the fourth Gospel which

would otherwise be a perplexing enigma--its _dramatic_ vividness and

consistency.

This dramatic truth of St. John's narrative, manifested in various

developments, deserves careful consideration. There are three notes in

the fourth Gospel which indicate either a consummate dramatic instinct

or a most faithful record. (1) The delineation of _individual

characters_. The Evangelist tells us with no unmeaning distinction,

that Jesus "knew all men, and knew what is in man!"[144] For some

persons take an apparently profound view of human nature in the

abstract. They pass for being sages so long as they confine themselves

to sounding generalizations, but they are convicted on the field of

life and experience. They claim to know what is in man; but they know

it vaguely, as one might be in possession of the outlines of a map,

yet totally ignorant of most places within its limits. Others, who

mostly affect to be keen men of the world, refrain from

generalizations; but they have an insight, which at times is

startling, into the characters of the individual men who cross their

path. There is a sense in which they superficially seem to know all

men, but their knowledge after all is capricious and limited. One

class affects to know men, but does not even affect to know man; the

other class knows something about man, but is lost in the infinite

variety of the world of real men. Our Lord knew both--both the

abstract ultimate principles of human nature and the subtle

distinctions which mark off every human character from every other. Of

this peculiar knowledge he who was brought into the most intimate

communion with the Great Teacher was made in some degree a partaker in

the course of His earthly ministry. With how few touches yet how

clearly are delineated the Baptist, Nathanael, the Samaritan woman,

the blind man, Philip, Thomas, Martha and Mary, Pilate! (2) More

particularly the _appropriateness_ and _consistency_ of the language

used by the various persons introduced in the narrative is, in the

case of a writer like St. John, a multiplied proof of historical

veracity.[145] For instance, of St. Thomas only one single sentence,

containing seven words, is preserved,[146] outside the memorable

narrative in the twentieth chapter; yet how unmistakably does that

brief sentence indicate the same character--tender, impetuous, loving,

yet ever inclined to take the darker view of things because from the

very excess of its affection it cannot believe in that which it most

desires, and demands accumulated and convincing proof of its own

happiness. (3) Further, the _language_ of our Lord which St. John

preserves is both morally and intellectually a marvellous witness to

the proof of his assertion here in the outset of his Epistle.

This may be exemplified by an illustration from modern literature.

Victor Hugo, in his _Légende des Siècles_, has in one passage only

placed in our Lord's lips a few words which are not found in the

Evangelist.[147] Every one will at once feel that these words ring

hollow, that there is in them something exaggerated and factitious--and

_that_ although the dramatist had the advantage of having a _type_ of

style already constructed for him. People talk as if the representation

in detail of a perfect character were a comparatively easy performance.

Yet every such representation shows some flaw when closely inspected.

For instance, a character in which Shakespeare so evidently delighted as

Buckingham, whose end is so noble and martyr-like, is thus described,

when on his trial, by a sympathising witness:

"'How did he bear himself?'

'When he was bought again to the bar, to hear,

His knell rung out, his judgment, he was struck

With such an agony, he sweat extremely,

And something spoke in choler, _ill and hasty_;

But he fell to himself again, and sweetly

In all the rest show'd a most noble patience.'"[148]

Our argument comes to this point. Here is one man of all but the

highest rank in dramatic genius, who utterly fails to invent even one

sentence which could possibly be taken for an utterance of our Lord.

Here is another, the most transcendent in the same order whom the

human race has ever known, who tacitly confesses the impossibility of

representing a character which shall be "one entire and perfect

chrysolite," without speck or flaw. Take yet another instance. Sir

Walter Scott appeals for "the fair licence due to the author of a

fictitious composition;" and admits that he "cannot pretend to the

observation of complete accuracy even in outward costume, much less in

the more important points of language and manners."[149] But St. John

was evidently a man of no such pretensions as these kings of the human

imagination--no Scott or Victor Hugo, much less a Shakespeare. How

then--except on the assumption of his being a faithful reporter, of

his recording words actually spoken, and witnessing incidents which he

had seen with his very eyes and contemplated with loving and admiring

reverence--can we account for his having given us long successions of

sentences, continuous discourses in which we trace a certain unity and

adaptation;[150] and a character which stands alone among all recorded

in history or conceived in fiction, by presenting to us an excellence

faultless in every detail? We assert that the one answer to this

question is boldly given us by St. John in the forefront of his

Epistle--"That which we have heard, which we have seen with our

eyes--concerning the Word who is the Life--declare we unto you."

St. John's mode of writing history may profitably be contrasted with

that of one who in his own line was a great master, as it has been

ably criticised by a distinguished statesman. Voltaire's historical

masterpiece is a portion of the life of Maria Theresa, which is

unquestionably written from a partly ideological point of view. For,

those who have patience to go back to the "sources," and to compare

Voltaire's narrative with them, will see the process by which a

literary master has produced his effect. The writer works as if he

were composing a classical tragedy restricted to the unities of time

and place. The three days of the coronation and of the successive

votes are brought into one effect, of which we are made to feel that

it is due to a magic inspiration of Maria Theresa. Yet, as the great

historical critic to whom we refer proceeds to demonstrate, a

different charm, very much more real because it comes from truth, may

be found in literal historical accuracy without this academic rouge.

Writers more conscientious than Voltaire would not have assumed that

Maria Theresa was degraded by a husband who was inferior to her. They

would not have substituted some pretty and pretentious phrases for the

genuine emotion not quite veiled under the official Latin of the

Queen. "However high a thing art may be, reality, truth, which is the

work of God, is higher!"[151] It is this conviction, this entire

intense adhesion to truth, this childlike ingenuousness which has made

St. John as an historian attain the higher region which is usually

reached by genius alone--which has given us narratives and passages

whose ideal beauty or awe is so transcendent or solemn, whose

pictorial grandeur or pathos is so inexhaustible, whose philosophical

depth is so unfathomable.[152]

He stands with spell-bound delight before his work without the

disappointment which ever attends upon men of genius; because that work

is not drawn from himself, because he can say three words--which we have

_heard_, which we have _seen_ with our eyes, which we have _gazed_ upon.

NOTES.

Ch. i. 2, 4.

Ver. 2. _Us_, _we_.] "The nominative plural first person is not always

of _majesty_ but often of _modesty_, when we share our privilege and

dignity with others" (_Grotius_). The context must decide what shade

of meaning is to be read into the text, _e.g._, here it is the we of

modesty, as also (very tenderly and beautifully) in ii. 1, 2, v. 5. It

rises into _majesty_ with the majestic, "we announce."

Ver. 4. "_These things._"] Not even the _fellowship_ with the Church

and with the Father and with the Son is so much in the Apostle's

intention here as the record in the _Gospel_.

_We write unto you._] In days when men's minds were still freshly full

of the privilege of free access to the Scriptures, these words suggested

(and they naturally enough do so still) the use of the written word, and

the guilt of the Church or of individuals in neglecting it. This has

been well expressed by an old divine. "That which is able to give us

full joy must not be deficient in anything which conduceth to our

happiness; but the holy Scriptures give fulness of joy, and therefore

the way to happiness is perfectly laid down in them. The _major_ of this

syllogism is so clear, that it needs no probation; for who can or will

deny, that full joy is only to be had in a state of bliss? The _minor_

is plain from this scripture, and may thus be drawn forth. That which

the Apostles aimed at in, may doubtless be attained to by, their

writings; for they being inspired of God, it is no other than the end

that God purposed in inspiring which they had in writing; and either God

Himself is wanting in the means which He hath designed for this end, or

these writings contain in them what will yield fulness of joy, and to

that end bring us to a state of blessedness.

"How odious is the profaneness of those Christians who neglect the holy

Scriptures, and give themselves to reading other books! How many

precious hours do many spend, and that not only on work days, but holy

days, in foolish romances, fabulous histories, lascivious poems! And why

this, but that they may be cheered and delighted, when as full joy is

only to be had in these holy books. Alas, the joy you find in those

writings is perhaps pernicious, such as tickleth your lust, and

promoteth contemplative wickedness. At the best it is but vain, such as

only pleaseth the fancy and affecteth the wit; whereas these holy

writings (to use David's expression, Psalm xix. 8), are 'right,

rejoicing the heart.' Again, are there not many who more set by

Plutarch's morals, Seneca's epistles, and suchlike books, than they do

by the holy Scriptures? It is true, there are excellent truths in those

moral writings of the heathen, but yet they are far short of these

sacred books. Those may comfort against outward trouble, but not against

inward fears; they may rejoice the mind, but cannot quiet the

conscience; they may kindle some flashy sparkles of joy, but they cannot

warm the soul with a lasting fire of solid consolation. And truly, if

ever God give you a spiritual ear to judge of things aright, you will

then acknowledge there are no bells like to those of Aaron, no harp like

to that of David, no trumpet like to that of Isaiah, no pipes like to

those of the Apostles." (_First Epistle of St. John, unfolded and

applied_ by Nathaniel Hardy, D.D., Dean of Rochester, about 1660.)

FOOTNOTES:

[141] The appeal to the senses of _seeing_ and _hearing_ is a trait

common to _all_ the group of St. John's writings (John i. 14, xix. 35;

1 John i. 1, 2, iv. 14; Apoc. i. 2). The true reading (καγω Ιωαννης ὁ

ακουων και βλεπων ταυτα. Apoc. xxi. 8, where _hearing_ stands before

_seeing_) is indicative of John's style.

[142] 1 John v. 6-12.

[143] That the "Acts of Paul and Thecla" are of high antiquity there

can be no rational doubt. Tertullian writes: "But if those who read

St. Paul's writings rashly use the example of Thecla, to give licence

to women to teach and baptize publicly, let them know that a presbyter

of Asia Minor, who put together that piece, crowning it with the

authority of a Pauline title, convicted by his own confession of doing

this from love of St. Paul, was deprived of his orders." (Tertullian,

_De Baptismo_, xvii.) On which St. Jerome remarks--"We therefore

relegate to the class of apocryphal writings, the περιοδος of Paul and

Thecla, and the whole fable of the baptized lion. For how could it be

that the sole real companion of the Apostle" (Luke) "while so well

acquainted with the rest of the history, should have known nothing of

this? And further, Tertullian, who touched so nearly upon those times,

records that a certain presbyter in Asia Minor, convicted before

_John_ of being the author of that book, and confessing that as a

σπουδαστης of the Apostle Paul he had done this from loving devotion

to that great memory, was deposed from his ministry." (St. Hieron.,

_de Script. Eccles._, VII.) See the mass of authority for the

antiquity of this document, which gives a considerable degree of

probability to the statement about St. John, in _Acta Apost. Apoc._,

Edit. Tischendorf.--Proleg. xxi., xxvi.

[144] John iii, 24, 25.

[145] Those who are perplexed by the identity in style and turn of

language between the Epistle and the discourse of our Lord in St.

John's Gospel may be referred to the writer's remarks in _The Speakers

Commentary_ (N. T. iv. 286-89). It should be added that the Epp. to

the Seven Churches (Apoc. ii., iii.)--especially to Sardis--interweave

sayings of Jesus recorded by the Synoptical evangelists, _e.g._, "as a

thief," Apoc. iii. 3, cf. Mark xiii. 37; "book of life," Apoc. iii. 5,

cf. Luke x. 20; "confessing a name," Apoc. iii. 5, cf. Matt. x. 32;

"He that hath an ear," Apoc. iii. 6, 13, 22, and ii. 7, 11, 17, 29.

This phrase, found in each of the seven Epp., occurs nowhere in the

fourth Gospel, but constantly in the Synoptics. Cf. Matt. x. 27, xi.

15, xiii. 19, 43; Mark iv. 9, 23, vii. 16; Luke viii. 8, xiv. 35; cf.

also "giving power over the nations," Apoc. ii. 26--with the

conception in Matt. xix. 28; Luke xxii. 29, 30. The word _repentance_

is nowhere in the fourth Gospel, nor given as part of our Lord's

teaching; but we find it Apoc. ii. 5, 16, iii. 3, 19. If the author of

the fourth Gospel was also the author of the Apocalypse, his choice of

the style which he attributes to the Saviour was at least decided by

no lack of knowledge of the Synoptical type of expression, and by no

incapacity to use it with freedom and power.

[146] John xi. 16.

[147]

"Qui me suit, aux anges est pareil.

Quand un homme a marché tout le jour au soleil

Dans un chemin sans puits et sans hôtellerie,

S'il ne croit pas quand vient le soir il pleure, il crie,

Il est las; sur la terre il tombe haletant.

S'il croit en moi, qu'il prie, il peut au même instant.

Continuer sa route avec des forces triples."

(_Le Christ et le Tombeau._) Tom. i. 44.

[148] King Henry VIII., Act 2, Sc. 1. Contrast again our Lord before

the council with St. Paul before that tribunal. In the case of one of

the chief of saints there is the touch of human infirmity, the

"something spoken in choler, ill and hasty," the angry and

contemptuous "whited wall"--the confession of hasty inconsiderateness

(ουκ ἡδειν--ὁτι εστιν αρχιερευς) which led to a violation of a precept

of the law (Exod. xxii. 28).

[149] Preface to _Ivanhoe_.

[150] _How_ the great sayings were accurately collected has not been

the question before us in this discourse. But it presents little

difficulty. It is not absurd to suppose (if we are required to

postulate no divine assistance) that notes may have been taken in some

form by certain members of the company of disciples. The profoundly

thoughtful remark of Irenæus upon his own unfailing recollection of

early lessons from Polycarp, would apply with indefinitely greater

force to such a pupil as John, of such a teacher as Jesus. "I can

thoroughly recollect things so far back better than those which have

lately occurred; for lessons which have grown with us since boyhood

are compacted into a unity with the very soul itself." (τη ψυχη

ἑνουνται αυτη) _Euseb._, v. 29. But above all, whatever subordinate

agency may have been employed in the preservation of those precious

words, every Christian reverently acknowledges the fulfilment of the

Saviour's promise--"The Comforter, the Holy Ghost, He shall teach you

all things, and bring all things to your remembrance _whatsoever I

have said unto you_" (John xiv. 26).

[151] Duc de Broglie. _Revue des deux Mondes._ 15 Jan. 1882. Coxe,

_House of Austria_, vol. iii., chap. xcix., p. 415, sqq.

[152] John xiii. 30, xi. 35, xix. 5, xxii. 29-35.

SECTION II.

GREEK. LATIN.

Και αυτη εστιν ἡ Et hæc est adnuntiatio

αγγελια ἡν ακηκοαμεν quam audivimus

απ' αυτου, και ab eo, et adnuntiamus

αναγγελλομεν ὑμιν, ὁτι vobis, quoniam Deus

ὁ Θεος φως εστιν, και lux est, et tenebræ in

σκοτια εν αυτω ουκ εστιν eo non sunt ullæ. Si

ουδεμια. εαν ειπωμεν dixerimus quoniam societatem

ὁτι κοινωνιαν εχομεν μετ' habemus cum

αυτου, και εν τω σκοτει eo et in tenebris ambulamus,

περιπατωμεν, ψευδομεθα, mentimur, et

και ου ποιουμεν την non facimus veritatem:

αληθειαν· εαν δε εν si autem in luce ambulamus

τω φωτι περιπατωμεν, sicut et ipse

ὡς αυτος εστιν εν est in luce, societatem

τω φωτι, κοινωνιαν εχομεν habemus ad invicem,

μετ' αλληλων, και et sanguis Iesu Christi,

το αιμα Ιησου του Filii eius, mundat nos

υιου αυτου καθαριζει omni peccato. Si

ἡμας απο πασης ἁμαρτιας. dixerimus quoniam

Εαν ειπωμεν ὁτι peccatum non habemus,

ἁμαρτιαν ουκ εχομεν, ipsi nos seducimus,

ἑαυτους πλανωμεν, και et veritas in nobis

ἡ αληθεια εν ἡμιν ουκ non est. Si confiteamur

εστιν. εαν ὁμολογωμεν peccata nostra,

τας ἁμαρτιας ἡμων, fidelis et justus est,

πιστος εστι και δικαιος, ut remittat nobis peccata

ἱνα ἁφη ἡμιν τας nostra, et emundet

ἁμαρτιας, και καθαριση nos ab omni iniquitate.

ἡμας απο πασης αδικιας. Si dixerimus

εαν ειπωμεν ὁτι ουχ quoniam non peccavimus,

ἡμαρτηκαμεν, ψευστην mendacem faciemus

ποιουμεν αυτον, και ὁ eum, et verbum

λογος αυτου ουκ εστιν εν eius in nobis non est.

ἡμιν. Filioli mei, hæc scribo

vobis, ut non peccetis:

Τεκνια μου, ταυτα sed et si quis peccaverit

γραφω ὑμιν, ἱνα μη advocatum habemus

ἁμαρτητε· και εαν τις apud Patrem, Iesum

ἁμαρτη, παρακλητον Christum iustum et

εχομεν προς τον πατερα, ipse est propitiatio pro

Ιησουν Χριστον δικαιον· peccatis nostris, non

και αυτος ιλασμος εστι pro nostris autem tantum

περι των ἁμαρτιων ἡμων· sed etiam pro

ου περι των ἡμετερων totius mundi.

δε μονον, αλλα και περι

ὁλου του κοσμου.

AUTHORISED VERSION. REVISED VERSION.

This then is the message And this is the message

which we have which we have

heard of Him, and declare heard from Him, and

unto you, that announce unto you,

God is light, and in that God is light, and

Him is no darkness at _in_ Him is _no darkness_

all. If we say that we at all. If we say that

have fellowship with we have fellowship

Him, and walk in darkness, with him, and walk in

we lie, and do not the darkness, we lie, and

the truth: but if we do not the truth: but

walk in the light, as if we walk in the light,

He is in the light, as He is in the light,

we have fellowship one we have fellowship one

with another, and the with another, and the

blood of Jesus Christ blood of Jesus His Son

His Son cleanseth us cleanseth us from all

from all sin. If we say sin. If we say that

that we have no sin, we have no sin, we

we deceive ourselves, deceive ourselves, and

and the truth is not in the truth is not in us.

us. If we confess our If we confess our

sins, He is faithful and sins He is faithful and

just to forgive us _our_ righteous to forgive us

sins, and to cleanse us our sins, and to cleanse

from all unrighteousness. us from all unrighteousness.

If we say that If we say that

we have not sinned, we have not sinned,

we make Him a liar, we make Him a liar,

and His word is not in and His word is not in

us. My little children, us. My little children,

these things write I these things write I

unto you, that ye sin unto you, that ye may

not. But if any man not sin. And if any

sin, we have an man sin, we have

advocate with the an Advocate with the

Father, Jesus Christ Father, Jesus Christ

the righteous: and He the righteous: and He

is the propitiation for is the propitiation for

our sins: and not for our sins; and not for

our's only, but also for ours only, but also for

_the sins of_ the whole the whole world.

world.

ANOTHER VERSION.

And this is the message

which we have

heard from Him and

are announcing unto

you that God is light,

and darkness in Him

there is none. If we

say that we have fellowship

with Him and

are walking in the

darkness, we lie and

are not doing the truth;

but if we walk in the

light as He is in the

light we have fellowship

one with another,

and the blood of Jesus

His Son is purifying

us from all sin. If we

say that we have not

sin, we mislead ourselves

and the truth

in us is not. If we

confess our sins He is

faithful and righteous

that He may forgive

our sins and purify us

from all unrighteousness.

If we say that

we have not sinned a

liar we are making

Him, and His word is

not in us. My children

these things write I

unto you that ye may

not sin. And yet if

any may have sinned,

an Advocate have we

with the Father Jesus

Christ _who is_ righteous:

and He is propitiation

for our sins; yea, and

not for ours only but

also for the whole

world.

DISCOURSE III.

_EXTENT OF THE ATONEMENT._

"My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin

not. And if any man sin we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus

Christ the righteous: and He is the propitiation for our sins, and

not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world."--1

JOHN ii. 1, 2.

Of the Incarnation of the Word, of the whole previous strain of solemn

oracular annunciation, there are two great objects. Rightly understood

it at once stimulates and soothes; it supplies inducements to

holiness, and yet quiets the accusing heart. (1) It urges to a

pervading holiness in each recurring circumstance of life.[153] "That

ye may not sin" is the bold universal language of the morality of God.

Men only understand moral teaching when it comes with a series of

monographs on the virtues, sobriety, chastity, and the rest.

Christianity does not overlook these, but it comes first with

all-inclusive principles. The morality of man is like the sculptor

working line by line and part by part, partially and successively. The

morality of God is like nature, and works in every part of the flower

and tree with a sort of ubiquitous presence. "These things write we

unto you." No dead letter--a living spirit infuses the lines; there is

a deathless principle behind the words which will vitalize and

permeate all isolated relations and developments of conduct. "These

things write we unto you that ye may not sin."

(2) But further, this announcement also soothes. There may be isolated

acts of sin against the whole tenor of the higher and nobler life.

There may be, God forbid!--but it may be--some glaring act of

inconsistency. In this case the Apostle uses a form of expression

which includes himself, "we have," and yet points to Christ, not to

himself, "we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ"--and that

in view of His being One who is perfectly and simply righteous; "and

He is the propitiation for our sins."

Then, as if suddenly fired by a great thought, St. John's view broadens

over the whole world beyond the limits of the comparatively little group

of believers whom his words at that time could reach. The Incarnation

and Atonement have been before his soul. The Catholic Church is the

correlative of the first, humanity of the second. The Paraclete whom he

beheld is ever in relation with, ever turned towards the Father.[154]

His propitiation _is_, and He _is_ it. It _was_ not simply a fact in

history which works on with unexhaustible force. As the Advocate is ever

turned towards the Father, so the propitiation lives on with unexhausted

life. His intercession is not verbal, temporary, interrupted. The

Church, in her best days, never prayed--"Jesus, pray for me!" It is

interpretative, continuous, unbroken. In time it is eternally valid,

eternally present. In space it extends as far as human need, and

therefore takes in every place. "Not for our sins only," but for men

universally, "for the whole world."[155]

It is implied then in this passage, that Christ was _intended_ as a

propitiation for the whole world; and that He is _fitted_ for

satisfying all human wants.

(1) Christ was intended for the whole world. Let us see the Divine

intention in one incident of the crucifixion. In that are mingling lines

of glory and of humiliation. The King of humanity appears with a scarlet

camp-mantle flung contemptuously over His shoulders; but to the eye of

faith it is the purple of empire. He is crowned with the acanthus

wreath; but the wreath of mockery is the royalty of our race. He is

crucified between two thieves; but His cross is a Judgment-Throne, and

at His right hand and His left are the two separated worlds of belief

and unbelief. All the Evangelists tell us that a superscription, a title

of accusation, was written over His cross; two of them add that it was

written over Him "in letters of Greek, and Latin, and Hebrew" (or in

Hebrew, Greek, Latin). In Hebrew--the sacred tongue of patriarchs and

seers, of the nation all whose members were in idea and destination

those of whom God said, "My prophets." In Greek--the "musical and golden

tongue which gave a soul to the objects of sense and a body to the

abstractions of philosophy;" the language of a people whose mission it

was to give a principle of fermentation to all races of mankind,

susceptible of those subtle and largely indefinable influences which are

called collectively Progress. In Latin--the dialect of a people

originally the strongest of all the sons of men. The three languages

represent the three races and their ideas--revelation, art, literature;

progress, war, and jurisprudence. Beneath the title is the thorn-crowned

head of the ideal King of humanity.

Wherever these three tendencies of the human race exist, wherever

annunciation can be made in human language, wherever there is a heart

to sin, a tongue to speak, an eye to read, the cross has a message.

The superscription, "written in Hebrew, Greek, and Latin," is the

historical symbol translated into its dogmatic form by St. John--"He

is the propitiation[156] for our sins, and not for ours only, but also

for the whole world."

FOOTNOTES:

[153] Observe in the Greek the μη ἁμαρτητε, which refers to single

acts, not to a continuous state--"that _ye may not sin_."

[154] 1 John ii. 2. As a translation, "towards" seems too pedantic;

yet προς is _ad-versus_ rather than _apud_, and with the accusative

signifies either the direction of motion, or the relation between two

objects. (Donaldson, _Greek Grammar_, 524). We may fittingly call the

preposition here προς _pictorial_.

[155] The various meanings of κοσμος are fully traced below on 1 John

ii. 17. There is one point in which the notions of κοσμος and αιων

intersect. But they may be thus distinguished. The first signifies the

world projected in _space_, the second in _time_. The supposition that

the form of expression at the close of our verse is elliptical, and to

be filled up by the repetition of "for the sins of the whole world"

"is not justified by usage, and weakens the force of the passage."

(_Epistles of St. John_, Westcott, p. 44.)

[156] As to doctrine. There are three "grand circles" or "families of

images" whereby Scripture approaches from different quarters, or surveys

from different sides, the benefits of our Lord's meritorious death.

These are represented by, are summed up in, three words--απολυτρωσις,

καταλλαγη, ιλασμος. The last is found in the text and in iv. 10; nowhere

else precisely in that form in the New Testament. "Ιλασμος (expiation or

propitiation) and απολυτρωσις (redemption) is fundamentally one single

benefit, _i.e._, the restitution of the lost sinner. Απολυτρωσις is in

respect of _enemies_; καταλλαγη in respect of _God_. And here again the

words ἱλασμ. and καταλλ. differ. _Propitiation_ takes away offences as

against _God_. _Reconciliation_ has two sides. It takes away (_a_) God's

_indignation_ against _us_, 2 Cor. v. 18, 19; (_b_) _our alienation_

from _God_, 2 Cor. v. 20." (Bengel on Rom. iii. 24. Whoever would

rightly understand all that we can know on these great words must study

_New Testament Synonyms, Archbp. Trench_, pp. 276-82.)

DISCOURSE IV.

_MISSIONARY APPLICATION OF THE EXTENT OF THE ATONEMENT._

"For the whole world."--1 JOHN ii. 2.

Let us now consider the universal and ineradicable wants of man.

Such a consideration is substantially unaffected by speculation as to

the theory of man's origin. Whether the first men are to be looked for

by the banks of some icy river feebly shaping their arrowheads of

flint, or in godlike and glorious progenitors beside the streams of

Eden; whether our ancestors were the result of an inconceivably

ancient evolution, or called into existence by a creative act, or

sprung from some lower creature elevated in the fulness of time by a

majestic inspiration,--at least, as a matter of fact, man has other

and deeper wants than those of the back and stomach. Man as he is has

five spiritual instincts. _How_ they came to be there, let it be

repeated, is not the question. It is the fact of their existence, not

the mode of their _genesis_, with which we are now concerned.

(1) There is almost, if not quite, without exception the instinct

which may be generally described as the instinct of the Divine. In the

wonderful address where St. Paul so fully recognises the influence of

geographical circumstance and of climate, he speaks of God "having

made out of one blood every nation of men to seek after their Lord,

if haply at least" (as might be expected) "they would feel for

Him"[157]--like men in darkness groping towards the light. (2) There

is the instinct of prayer, the "testimony of the soul naturally

Christian." The little child at our knees meets us half way in the

first touching lessons in the science of prayer. In danger, when the

vessel seems to be sinking in a storm, it is ever as it was in the

days of Jonah, when "the mariners cried every man unto his God."[158]

(3) There is the instinct of immortality, the desire that our

conscious existence should continue beyond death.

"Who would lose,

Though full of pain, this intellectual being,

These thoughts that wander through eternity,

To perish rather swallow'd up and lost

In the wide womb of uncreated night?"

(4) There is the instinct of morality, call it conscience or what we

will. The lowest, most sordid, most materialised languages are never

quite without witness to this nobler instinct. Though such languages

have lien among the pots, yet their wings are as the wings of a dove

that is covered with silver wings and her feathers like gold. The most

impoverished vocabularies have words of moral judgment, "good" or

"bad;" of praise or blame, "truth and lie;" above all, those august

words which recognise a law paramount to all other laws, "I must," "I

ought." (5) There is the instinct of _sacrifice_, which, if not

absolutely universal, is at least all but so--the sense of impurity

and unworthiness, which says by the very fact of bringing a victim. "I

am not worthy to come alone; may my guilt be transferred to the

representative which I immolate."

(1) Thus then man seeks after God. Philosophy unaided does not succeed

in finding Him. The theistic systems marshal their syllogisms; they

prove, but do not convince. The pantheistic systems glitter before

man's eye; but when he grasps them in his feverish hand, and brushes

off the mystic gold dust from the moth's wings, a death's-head mocks

him. St. John has found the essence of the whole question, stripped

from it all its plausible disguises, and characterises Mahommedan and

Judaistic Deism in a few words. Nay, the philosophical deism of

Christian countries comes within the scope of his terrible

proposition. "Deo erexit Voltairius," was the philosopher's

inscription over the porch of a church; but Voltaire had not in any

true sense a God to whom he could dedicate it. For St. John tells

us--"whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father."[159]

Other words there are in his Second Epistle whose full import seems to

have been generally overlooked, but which are of solemn significance

to those who go out from the camp of Christianity with the idea of

finding a more refined morality and a more ethereal spiritualism.

"Whosoever goeth forward and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ";

whosoever writes progress on his standard, and goes forward beyond the

lines of Christ, loses natural as well as supernatural religion--"he

hath not God."[160] (2) Man wants to pray. Poor disinherited child,

what master of requests shall he find? Who shall interpret his broken

language to God, God's infinite language to him? (3) Man yearns for

the assurance of immortal life. This can best be given by one specimen

of manhood risen from the grave, one traveller come back from the

undiscovered bourne with the breath of eternity on His cheek and its

light in His eye; one like Jonah, Himself the living sign and proof

that He has been down in the great deeps. (4) Man needs a morality to

instruct and elevate conscience. Such a morality must possess these

characteristics. It must be _authoritative_, resting upon an absolute

will; its teacher must say, not "I think," or "I conclude,"

but--"verily, verily I say unto you." It must be _unmixed_ with baser

and more questionable elements. It must be _pervasive_, laying the

strong grasp of its purity on the whole domain of thought and feeling

as well as of action. It must be _exemplified_. It must present to us

a series of pictures, of object-lessons in which we may see it

illustrated. Finally, this morality must be _spiritual_. It must come

to man, not like the Jewish Talmud with its seventy thousand precepts

which few indeed can ever learn, but with a compendious and condensed,

yet all-embracing brevity--with words that are spirit and life. (5) As

man knows duty more thoroughly, the instinct of sacrifice will speak

with an ever-increasing intensity. "My heart is overwhelmed by the

infinite purity of this law. Lead me to the rock that is higher than

I; let me find God and be reconciled to Him." When the old Latin spoke

of _propitiation_ he thought of something which brought _near

(prope)_; his inner thought was--"let God come near to me, that I may

be near to God." These five ultimate spiritual wants, these five

ineradicable spiritual instincts, _He_ must meet, of whom a master of

spiritual truth like St. John can say with his plenitude of

insight--"He is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only,

but also for the whole world."

We shall better understand the fulness of St. John's thought if we

proceed to consider that this fitness in Christ for meeting the

spiritual wants of humanity is _exclusive_.

Three great religions of the world are more or less _Missionary_.

Hinduism, which embraces at least a hundred and ninety millions of

souls, is certainly not in any sense missionary. For Hinduism

transplanted from its ancient shrines and local superstitions dies

like a flower without roots. But Judaism at times has strung itself to

a kind of exertion almost inconsistent with its leading idea. The very

word "proselyte" attests the unnatural fervour to which it had worked

itself up in our Lord's time. The Pharisee was a missionary sent out

by pride and consecrated by self-will. "Ye compass sea and land to

make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him tenfold more the

child of hell than yourselves."[161] Bouddhism has had enormous

missionary success from one point of view. Not long ago it was said

that it outnumbered Christendom. But it is to be observed that it

finds adherents among people of only one type of thought and

character.[162] Outside these races it is and must ever be,

non-existent. We may except the fanciful perversion of a few idle

people in London, Calcutta, or Ceylon, captivated for a season or two

by "the light of Asia." We may except also a very few more remarkable

cases where the esoteric principle of Bouddhism commends itself to

certain profound thinkers stricken with the dreary disease of modern

sentiment. Mohammedanism has also, in a limited degree, proved itself

a missionary religion, not only by the sword. In British India it

counts millions of adherents, and it is still making some progress in

India. In other ages whole Christian populations (but belonging to

heretical and debased forms of Christianity) have gone over to

Mohammedanism. Let us be just to it.[163] It once elevated the pagan

Arabs. Even now it elevates the Negro above his fetisch. But it must

ever remain a religion for stationary races, with its sterile God and

its poor literality, the dead book pressing upon it with a weight of

lead. Its merits are these--it inculcates a lofty if sterile Theism;

it fulfils the pledge conveyed in the word Moslem, by inspiring a calm

if frigid resignation to destiny; it teaches the duty of prayer with a

strange impressiveness. But whole realms of thought and feeling are

crushed out by its bloody and lustful grasp. It is without purity,

without tenderness, and without humility.

Thus then we come back again with a truer insight to the exclusive

fitness of Christ to meet the wants of mankind.

Others beside the Incarnate Lord have obtained from a portion of their

fellow-men some measure of passionate enthusiasm. Each people has a

hero, call him demigod, or what we will. But such men are idolised by

one race alone, and are fashioned after its likeness. The very qualities

which procure them an apotheosis are precisely those which prove how

narrow the type is which they represent; how far they are from speaking

to all humanity. A national type is a narrow and exclusive type.

No European, unless effeminated and enfeebled, could really love an

Asiatic Messiah. But Christ is loved everywhere. No race or kindred is

exempt from the sweet contagion produced by the universal appeal of the

universal Saviour. From all languages spoken by the lips of man, hymns

of adoration are offered to Him. We read in England the Confessions of

St. Augustine. Those words still quiver with the emotions of penitence

and praise; still breathe the breath of life. Those ardent affections,

those yearnings of personal love to Christ, which filled the heart of

Augustine fifteen centuries ago, under the blue sky of Africa, touch us

even now under this grey heaven in the fierce hurry of our modern life.

But they have in them equally the possibility of touching the Shanar of

Tinnevelly, the Negro--even the Bushman, or the native of Terra del

Fuego. By a homage of such diversity and such extent we recognise a

universal Saviour for the universal wants of universal man, the fitting

propitiation for the whole world.

Towards the close of this Epistle St. John oracularly utters three

great canons of universal Christian consciousness--"we know," "we

know," "we know." Of these three canons the second is--"we know that

we are from God, and the world lieth wholly in the wicked one." "A

characteristic Johannic exaggeration"! some critic has exclaimed; yet

surely even in Christian lands where men lie outside the influences of

the Divine society, we have only to read the Police-reports to justify

the Apostle. In volumes of travels, again, in the pages of Darwin and

Baker, from missionary records in places where the earth is full of

darkness and cruel habitations, we are told of deeds of lust and blood

which almost make us blush to bear the same form with creatures so

degraded. Yet the very same missionary records bear witness that in

every race which the Gospel proclamation has reached, however low it

may be placed in the scale of the ethnologist; deep under the ruins of

the fall are the spiritual instincts, the affections which have for

their object the infinite God, and for their career the illimitable

ages. The shadow of sin is broad indeed. But in the evening light of

God's love the shadow of the cross is projected further still into the

infinite beyond. Missionary success is therefore sure, if it be slow.

The reason is given by St. John. "He is the propitiation for our sins,

and not for ours only, but for the whole world."

NOTES.

Ch. i. 5 to ii. 2.

Ver. 5. The Word, the Life, the Light, are connected in the first

chapter as in John i. 3, 4, 5. Upon earth, behind all life is light;

in the spiritual world, behind all light is life.

_Darkness._] The schoolmen well said that there is a fourfold

darkness--of nature, of ignorance, of misery, of sin. The symbol of

light applied to God must designate perfect goodness and beauty,

combined with blissful consciousness of it, and transparent luminous

clearness of wisdom.

Ver. 7. _The blood of Jesus His Son_] Sc. poured forth. This word (the

Blood) denotes more vividly and effectively than any other could do

three great realities of the Christian belief--the reality of the

Manhood of Jesus, the reality of His sufferings, the reality of His

sacrifice. It is dogma; but dogma made pictorial, pathetic, almost

passionate. It may be noted that much current thought and feeling

around us is just at the opposite extreme. It is a semi-doketism which

is manifested in two different forms. (1) Whilst it need not be

denied that there are hymns which are pervaded by an ensanguined

materialism, and which are calculated to wound reverence, as well as

taste; it is clear that much criticism on hymns and sermons, where the

"Blood of Jesus" is at all appealed to, has an ultra-refinement which

is unscriptural and rationalistic. It is out of touch with St. Paul

(Col. i. 14-20), with the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews (Heb.

ix. 14) (a passage strikingly like this verse), with St. Peter (1 Pet.

i. 19), with St. John in this Epistle, with the redeemed in heaven

(Apoc. v. 9). (2) A good deal of feeling against representations in

sacred art seems to have its origin in this sort of unconscious

semi-doketism. It appears to be thought that when representation

supersedes symbolism, Christian thought and feeling necessarily lose

everything and gain nothing. But surely it ought to be remembered that

for a being like man there are two worlds, one of ideas, the other of

facts; one of philosophy, the other of history. The one is filled with

things which are conceived, the other with things which are done. One

contents itself with a shadowy symbol, the other is not satisfied

except by a concrete representation. So we venture respectfully to

think that the image of the dead Christ is not foreign to Scripture or

Scriptural thought; simply because, _as a fact_, He died. Calvary, the

tree, the wounds, were not ideal. The crucifixion was not a symbol for

dainty and refined abstract theorists. The form of the Crucified was

not veiled by silver mists and crowned with roses. He who realises the

meaning of the "Blood of Jesus," and is _consistent_, will not be

severe upon the expression of the same thought in another form.

"Note that which Estius hath upon the blood of his Son, that in them

there is a confutation of three heresies at once: the Manichees, who

deny the truth of Christ's human nature, since, as Alexander said of his

wound, _clamat me esse hominem_, it proclaimeth me a man, we may say of

His blood, for had He not been man He could not have bled, have died;

the Ebionites, who deny Him to be God, since, being God's natural Son,

He must needs be of the same essence with Himself; and the Nestorians,

who make two persons, which, if true, the blood of Christ the man could

not have been called the blood of Christ the Son of God."

"That which I conceive here chiefly to be taken notice of is, that our

Apostle contents not himself to say the _blood of Jesus Christ_, but

he addeth _His Son_, to intimate to us how this blood became available

to our cleansing, to wit, as it was the blood not merely of the Son of

Mary, the Son of David, the Son of Man, but of Him who was also the

Son of God."

"Behold, O sinner, the exceeding love of thy Saviour, who, that He

might cleanse thee when polluted in thy blood, was pleased to shed His

own blood. Indeed, the pouring out of Christ's blood was a

super-excellent work of charity; hence it is that these two are joined

together; and when the Scripture speaketh of His love, it presently

annexeth His sufferings. We read, that when Christ wept for Lazarus,

John xi. 36, the standers by said, "See how He loved him." Surely if

His tears, much more His blood, proclaimeth His affection towards us.

The Jews were the scribes, the nails were the pens, His body the white

paper, and His blood the red ink; and the characters were love,

exceeding love, and these so fairly written that he which runs may

read them. I shut up this with that of devout Bernard, Behold and look

upon the rose of His bloody passion, how His redness bespeaketh His

flaming love, there being, as it were, a contention betwixt His

passion and affection: this, that it might be hotter; that, that it

might be redder. Nor had His sufferings been so red with blood had not

His heart been inflamed with love. Oh let us beholding magnify,

magnifying admire, and admiring praise Him for His inestimable

goodness, saying with the holy Apostle (Rev. i. 5), 'Unto Him that

loved us, and washed us from our sins in His blood, be honour and

glory for ever.'"--_Dean Hardy_ (pp. 77, 78.) Observe on this verse

its unison of thought and feeling with Apoc. i. 5, xxii. 14.[164]

Chap. ii. 1. _We have an Advocate_] literally Paraclete. One called in

to aid him whose cause is to be tried or petition considered. The word

is used only by St. John, four times in the Gospel, of the Holy

Ghost;[165] once here of Christ.

"And now, O thou drooping sinner, let me bespeak thee in St.

Austin's[166] language: Thou committest thy cause to an eloquent lawyer,

and art safe; how canst thou miscarry, when thou hast the Word to be thy

advocate? Let me put this question to thee: If, when thou sinnest, thou

hadst all the angels, saints, confessors, martyrs, in those celestial

mansions to beg thy pardon, dost thou think they would not speed? I tell

thee, one word out of Christ's mouth is more worth than all their

conjoined entreaties. When, therefore, thy daily infirmities discourage

thee, or particular falls affright thee, imagine with thyself that thou

heardst thy advocate pleading for thee in these or the like expressions:

O My loving Father, look upon the face of Thine Anointed; behold the

hands, and feet, and side of Thy crucified Christ! I had no sins of My

own for which I thus suffered; no, it was for the sins of this penitent

wretch, who in My name sued for pardon! Father, I am Thy Son, the Son of

Thy love, Thy bosom, who plead with Thee; it is for Thy child, Thy

returning penitent child, I plead. That for which I pray is no more than

what I paid for; I have merited pardon for all that come to Me! Oh let

those merits be imputed, and that pardon granted to this poor sinner!

Cheer up, then, thou disconsolate soul, Christ is an advocate for thee,

and therefore do not despair, but believe; and believing, rejoice; and

rejoicing, triumph."--_Dean Hardy_ (pp. 128, 129). In these days, when

petitions to Jesus to pray for us have crept into hymns and are creeping

into liturgies, it may be well to note that in the remains of the early

saints and in the solemn formulas of the Christian Church, Christ is not

asked to pray for us, but to hear our prayers. The Son is prayed to; the

Father is prayed to through the Son; the Son is never prayed to pray to

the Father. (See Greg. Nazianz., _Oratio_ xxx., _Theologiæ_ iv., _de

Filio_. See Thomassin, _Dogm. Theol._, lib. ix., cap. 6, Tom. iv. 220,

227.)

Ver. 2. _Not for ours only._] This large-hearted afterthought reminds

one of St. Paul's "corrective and ampliative" addition; of his

chivalrous abstinence from exclusiveness in thought or word, when

having dictated "Jesus Christ our Lord," his voice falters, and he

feels constrained to say--"both theirs, and ours" (1 Cor. i. 2).

FOOTNOTES:

[157] Acts xvii. 27.

[158] Jonah i. 5.

[159] 1 John ii. 28.

[160] 2 John 9.

[161] Matt. xxiii. 15.

[162] Bouddhism, it is now said, appears to be on the wane, and the

period for its disappearance is gradually approaching, according to

the Boden Professor of Sanscrit at Oxford. In his opinion this creed

is "one of rapidly increasing disintegration and decline," and "as a

form of popular religion Bouddhism is gradually losing its vitality

and hold on the vast populations once loyal to its rule." He computes

the number of Bouddhists at 100,000,000; not 400,000,000 as hitherto

estimated; and places Christianity numerically at the head of all

religions--next Confucianism, thirdly Hinduism, then Bouddhism, and

last Mohammedanism. He affirms that the capacity of Bouddhism for

resistance must give way before the "mighty forces which are destined

to sweep the earth."

[163] That modern English writers have been more than just to Mohammed

is proved overwhelmingly by the living Missionary who knows

Mohammedanism best.--_Mohammed and Mohammedans_. Dr. Koelle.

[164] The inner meaning of 1 John i. 8 exactly = ὑπακοη και ῥαντισμος

(1 Peter i. 2). It is the _obedient_ who are _sprinkled_.

[165] John xiv. 16, 26, xv. 26, xvi. 7.

[166] Aug. _in loc._

SECTION III. (1).

GREEK. LATIN.

Και εν τουτω Et in hoc scimus

γινωσκομεν ὁτι εγνωκαμεν quoniam cognovimus

αυτον, εαν τας εντολας eum, si mandata eius

αυτου τηρωμεν. ὁ λεγων, observemus. Qui dicit

ὁτι "Εγνωκα αυτον," se nosse eum et mandata

και τας εντολας αυτου eius non custodit,

μη τηρων, ψευστης εστιν, mendax est, et

και εν τουτω ἡ αληθεια in eo veritas non est:

ουκ εστιν· ὁς δ' αν qui autem servat verbum

τηρη αυτου τον λογον, eius, vere in eo

αληθως εν τουτω ἡ caritas Dei perfecta

αγαπη του Θεου τετελειωται. est: in hoc scimus

εν τουτω quoniam in ipso sumus.

γινωσκομεν ὁτι εν αυτω Qui dicit se in

εσμεν. ὁ λεγων εν ipso manere debet sicut

αυτω μενειν, οφειλει, ille ambulavit et ipse

καθως εκεινος περιεπατησεν, ambulare.

και αυτος ουτως

περιπατειν.

AUTHORISED VERSION. REVISED VERSION.

And hereby we do And _hereby know_ we

know that we know that we _know_ Him, if

Him, if we keep His we keep His commandments.

commandments. He He that

that saith, I know Him, saith, I know Him, and

and keepeth not His keepeth not His commandments

commandments, is a is a liar,

liar, and the truth is and the truth is not in

not in Him. But whoso him: but whoso keepeth

keepeth His word, His word, in him verily

in him verily is the hath the love of God

love of God perfected: been perfected. Hereby

hereby know we that know we that we

we are in Him. He are in Him: he that

that saith he abideth saith he abideth in

in Him ought himself Him ought himself also

also so to walk, even to walk even as He

as He walked. walked.

ANOTHER VERSION.

And hereby we do

know that we have

knowledge of Him, if

we observe His commandments.

He that

saith I have knowledge

of Him and observeth

not His commandments

is a liar, and in

this man the truth

is not. But whoso

observeth His word

verily in this man the

love of God is perfected.

Hereby know

we that we are in

Him: he that saith

he abideth in Him is

bound, even as He

walked, so also himself

to be ever walking.

DISCOURSE V.

_THE INFLUENCE OF THE GREAT LIFE WALK A PERSONAL INFLUENCE._

"He that saith he abideth in Him, ought himself also so to walk

even as He also walked."--1 JOHN ii. 6.

This verse is one of those in reading which we may easily fall into

the fallacy of mistaking _familiarity_ for knowledge.

Let us bring out its meaning with accuracy.

St. John's hatred of unreality, of lying in every form, leads him to

claim in Christians a perfect correspondence between the outward

profession and the inward life, as well as the visible manifestation

of it. "He that saith" always marks a danger to those who are

outwardly in Christian communion. It is the "take notice" of a hidden

falsity. He whose claim, possibly whose vaunt, is that he abideth in

Christ, has contracted a moral debt of far-reaching significance. St.

John seems to pause for a moment. He points to a picture in a page of

the scroll which is beside him--the picture of Christ in the Gospel

drawn by himself; not a vague magnificence, a mere harmony of colour,

but a likeness of absolute historical truth. Every pilgrim of time in

the continuous course of his daily walk, outward and inward, has by

the possession of that Gospel contracted an obligation to be walking

by the one great life-walk of the Pilgrim of eternity. The very depth

and intensity of feeling half hushes the Apostle's voice. Instead of

the beloved Name which all who love it will easily supply,[167] St.

John uses the reverential _He_, the pronoun which specially belongs to

Christ in the vocabulary of the Epistle.[168] "He that saith he

abideth in Him" is bound, even as He once walked, to be ever walking.

I.

The importance of _example_ in the moral and spiritual life gives

emphasis to this canon of St. John.

Such an example as can be sufficient for creatures like ourselves

should be at once manifested in concrete form and susceptible of ideal

application.

This was felt by a great but unhappily anti-christian thinker, the

exponent of a severe and lofty morality. Mr. Mill fully confesses that

there may be an elevating and an ennobling influence in a Divine ideal;

and thus justifies the apparently startling precept--"be ye therefore

perfect, even as your Father which is in Heaven is perfect."[169] But he

considered that some more human model was necessary for the moral

striver. He recommends novel-readers, when they are charmed or

strengthened by some conception of pure manhood or womanhood, to carry

that conception with them into their own lives. He would have them ask

themselves in difficult positions, how that strong and lofty man, that

tender and unselfish woman, would have behaved in similar circumstances,

and so bear about with them a standard of duty at once compendious and

affecting. But to this there is one fatal objection--that such an

elaborate process of make-believe is practically impossible. A fantastic

morality, if it were possible at all, must be a feeble morality. Surely

an authentic example will be greatly more valuable.

But _example_, however precious, is made indefinitely more powerful

when it is _living_ example, example crowned by personal influence.

So far as the stain of a guilty past can be removed from those who have

contracted it; they are improvable and capable of restoration, chiefly,

perhaps almost exclusively, by personal influence in some form. When a

process of deterioration and decay has set in in any human soul, the

germ of a more wholesome growth is introduced in nearly every case, by

the transfusion and transplantation of healthier life. We test the

soundness or the putrefaction of a soul by its capacity of receiving and

assimilating this germ of restoration. A parent is in doubt whether a

son is susceptible of renovation, whether he has not become wholly evil.

He tries to bring the young man under the personal influence of a friend

of noble and sympathetic character. Has his son any capacity left for

being touched by such a character; of admiring its strength on one side,

its softness on another? When he is in contact with it, when he

perceives how pure, how self-sacrificing, how true and straight it is,

is there a glow in his face, a trembling of his voice, a moisture in his

eye, a wholesome self-humiliation? Or does he repel all this with a

sneer and a bitter gibe? Has he that evil attribute which is possessed

only by the most deeply corrupt--"they blaspheme, rail at glories"?[170]

The Chaplain of a penitentiary records that among the most degraded of

its inmates was one miserable creature. The Matron met her with

firmness, but with a good will which no hardness could break down, no

insolence overcome. One evening after prayers the Chaplain observed this

poor outcast stealthily kissing the shadow of the Matron thrown by her

candle upon the wall. He saw that the diseased nature was beginning to

be capable of assimilating new life, that the victory of wholesome

personal influence had begun. He found reason for concluding that his

judgment was well founded.

The law of restoration by living example through personal influence

pervades the whole of our human relations under God's natural and

moral government as truly as the principle of mediation. This law also

pervades the system of restoration revealed to us by Christianity. It

is one of the chief results of the Incarnation itself. It begins to

act upon us first, when the Gospels become something more to us than a

mere history, when we realise in some degree how He walked. But it is

not complete until we know that all this is not merely of the past,

but of the present; that He is not dead, but living; that we may

therefore use that little word _is_ about Christ in the lofty sense of

St. John--"even as He _is_ pure;" "in Him _is_ no sin;" "even as He

_is_ righteous;" "He _is_ the propitiation for our sins." If this is

true, as it undoubtedly is, of all good human influence personal and

living, is it not true of the Personal and living Christ in an

infinitely higher degree? If the shadow of Peter overshadowing the

sick had some strange efficacy; if handkerchiefs or aprons from the

body of Paul wrought upon the sick and possessed; what may be the

spiritual result of contact with Christ Himself? Of one of those men

specially gifted to raise struggling natures and of others like him, a

true poet lately taken from us has sung in one of his most glorious

strains. Matthew Arnold likens mankind to a host inexorably bound by

divine appointment to march over mountain and desert to the city of

God. But they become entangled in the wilderness through which they

march, split into mutinous factions, and are in danger of "battering

on the rocks" for ever in vain, of dying one by one in the waste. Then

comes the poet's appeal to the "servants of God":--

"In the hour of need

Of your fainting dispirited race,

Ye like angels appear!

Languor is not in your heart,

Weakness is not in your word,

Weariness not on your brow.

Eyes rekindling, and prayers

Follow your steps as ye go.

Ye fill up the gaps in our file,

Strengthen the wavering line,

Stablish, continue our march--

On, to the bound of the waste--

On to the City of God."[171]

If all this be true of the personal influence of good and strong

men--true in proportion to their goodness and strength--it must be

true of the influence of the Strongest and Best with Whom we are

brought into personal relation by prayer and sacraments, and by

meditation upon the sacred record which tells us what His one

life-walk was. Strength is not wanting upon His part, for He is able

to save to the uttermost. Pity is not wanting; for to use touching

words (attributed to St. Paul in a very ancient apocryphal document),

"He alone sympathised with a world that has lost its way."[172]

Let it not be forgotten that in that of which St. John speaks lies the

true answer to an objection, formulated by the great anti-christian

writer above quoted, and constantly repeated by others. "The ideal of

Christian morality," says Mr. Mill, "is negative rather than positive;

passive rather than active; innocence rather than nobleness; abstinence

from evil, rather than energetic pursuit of good; in its precepts (as

has been well said), 'thou shalt not' predominates unduly over 'thou

shalt.'"[173] The answer is this. (1) A true religious system must have

a distinct moral code. If not, it would be justly condemned for

"expressing itself" (in the words of Mr. Mill's own accusation against

Christianity elsewhere) "in language most general, and possessing rather

the impressiveness of poetry or eloquence than the precision of

legislation." But the necessary formula of precise legislation is, "thou

shalt not"; and without this it cannot be precise. (2) But further. To

say that Christian legislation is negative, a mere string of "thou shalt

nots," is just such a superficial accusation as might be expected from a

man who should enter a church upon some rare occasion, and happen to

listen to the ten commandments, but fall asleep before he could hear the

Epistle and Gospel. The philosopher of duty, Kant, has told us that the

peculiarity of a moral principle, of any proposition which states what

duty is, is to convey the meaning of an imperative through the form of

an indicative. In his own expressive if pedantic language--"its

categorical form involves an epitactic meaning." St. John asserts that

the Christian "ought to walk even as Christ walked." To every one who

receives it, that proposition is therefore precisely equivalent to a

_command_--"walk as Christ walked." Is it a negative, passive morality,

a mere system of "thou shalt not," which contains such a precept as

that? Does not the Christian religion in virtue of this alone enforce a

great "thou shalt;" which every man who brings himself within its range

will find rising with him in the morning, following him like his shadow

all day long, and lying down with him when he goes to rest?

II.

It should be clearly understood that in the words "even as He walked,"

the Gospel of St. John is both referred to and attested.

For surely to point with any degree of moral seriousness to an

example, _is_ to presuppose some clear knowledge and definite record

of it. No example can be beautiful or instructive when its shape is

lost in darkness. It has indeed been said by a deeply religious

writer, "that the likeness of the Christian to Christ is to His

character, not to the particular form in which it was historically

manifested." And this, of course, is in one sense a truism. But how

else except by this historical manifestation can we know the character

of Christ in any true sense of the word knowledge? For those who are

familiar with the fourth Gospel, the term "walk" was tenderly

significant. For if it was used with a reminiscence of the Old

Testament and of the language of our Lord,[174] to denote the whole

continuous activity of the life of any man inward and outward, there

was another signification which became entwined with it. St. John had

used the word historically[175] in his Gospel, not without allusion to

the Saviour's homelessness on earth, to His itinerant life of

beneficence and of teaching.[176] Those who first received this

Epistle with deepest reverence as the utterance of the Apostle whom

they loved, when they came to the precept--"walk even as He

walked"--would ask themselves _how_ did He walk? What do we know of

the great rule of life thus proposed to us? The Gospel which

accompanied this letter, and with which it was in some way closely

connected, was a sufficient and definite answer.

III.

The character of Christ in his Gospel is thus, according to St. John,

the loftiest ideal of purity, peace, self-sacrifice, unbroken

communion with God; the inexhaustible fountain of regulated thoughts,

high aims, holy action, constant prayer.

We may advert to one aspect of this perfection as delineated in the

fourth Gospel--our Lord's way of doing small things, or at least

things which in human estimation appear to be small.

The fourth chapter of that Gospel contains a marvellous record of word

and work. Let us trace that record back to its beginning. There are

seeds of spiritual life scattered in many hearts which were destined

to yield a rich harvest in due time; there is the account of one

sensuous nature, quickened and spiritualised; there are promises which

have been for successive centuries as a river of God to weary natures.

All these results issue from three words spoken by a tired traveller,

sitting naturally over a well--"give me to drink."

We take another instance. There is one passage in St. John's Gospel

which divides with the proœmium of his Epistle, the glory of being the

loftiest, the most prolonged, the most sustained, in the Apostle's

writings.

It is the prelude of a work which might have seemed to be of little

moment. Yet all the height of a great ideal is over it, like the vault

of heaven; all the power of a Divine purpose is under it, like the

strength of the great deep; all the consciousness of His death, of His

ascension, of His coming dominion, of His Divine origin, of His session

at God's right hand--all the hoarded love in His heart for His own which

were in the world--passes by some mysterious transference into that

little incident of tenderness and of humiliation. He sets an everlasting

mark upon it, not by a basin of gold crusted with gems, nor by mixing

precious scents with the water which He poured out, nor by using linen

of the finest tissue, but by the absolute perfection of love and dutiful

humility in the spirit and in every detail of the whole action. It is

one more of those little chinks through which the whole sunshine of

heaven streams in upon those who have eyes to see.[177]

The underlying secret of this feature of our Lord's character is told

by Himself. "My meat is to be ever doing the will of Him that sent Me,

and so when the time comes by one great decisive act to finish His

work."[178] All along the course of that life-walk there were smaller

preludes to the great act which won our redemption--multitudinous

daily little perfect epitomes of love and sacrifice, without which the

crowning sacrifice would not have been what it was. The plan of our

life must, of course, be constructed on a scale as different as the

human from the Divine. Yet there is a true sense in which this lesson

of the great life may be applied to us.

The apparently small things of life must not be despised or neglected on

account of their smallness, by those who would follow the precept of St.

John. Patience and diligence in petty trades, in services called menial,

in waiting on the sick and old, in a hundred such works, all come within

the sweep of this net, with its lines that look as thin as cobwebs, and

which yet for Christian hearts are stronger than fibres of steel--"walk

even as He walked." This, too, is our only security. A French poet has

told a beautiful tale. Near a river which runs between French and German

territory, a blacksmith was at work one snowy night near Christmas time.

He was tired out, standing by his forge, and wistfully looking towards

his little home, lighted up a short quarter of a mile away, and wife and

children waiting for their festal supper, when he should return. It came

to the last piece of his work, a rivet which it was difficult to finish

properly; for it was of peculiar shape, intended by the contractor who

employed him to pin the metal work of a bridge which he was constructing

over the river. The smith was sorely tempted to fail in giving honest

work, to hurry over a job which seemed at once so troublesome and so

trifling. But some good angel whispered to the man that he should do his

best. He turned to the forge with a sigh, and never rested until the

work was as complete as his skill could make it. The poet carries us on

for a year or two. War breaks out. A squadron of the blacksmith's

countrymen is driven over the bridge in headlong flight. Men, horses,

guns, try its solidity. For a moment or two the whole weight of the mass

really hangs upon the one rivet. There are times in life when the whole

weight of the soul also hangs upon a rivet; the rivet of sobriety, of

purity, of honesty, of command of temper. Possibly we have devoted

little or no honest work to it in the years when we should have

perfected the work; and so, in the day of trial, the rivet snaps, and we

are lost.

There is one word of encouragement which should be finally spoken for

the sake of one class of God's servants.

Some are sick, weary, broken, paralysed, it may be slowly dying.

What--they sometimes ask--have we to do with this precept? Others who

have hope, elasticity, capacity of service, may walk as He walked; but

we can scarcely do so. Such persons should remember what walking in

the Christian sense is--all life's activity inward and outward. Let

them think of Christ upon His cross. He was fixed to it, nailed hand

and foot. Nailed; yet never--not when He trod upon the waves, not when

He moved upward through the air to His throne--never did He walk more

truly because He walked in the way of perfect love. It is just whilst

looking at the moveless form upon the tree that we may hear most

touchingly the great "thou shalt"--thou shalt walk even as He walked.

IV.

As there is a literal, so there is a mystical walking as Christ

walked. This is an idea which deeply pervades St. Paul's writings. Is

it His birth? We are born again. Is it His life? We walk with Him in

newness of life. Is it His death? We are crucified with Him. Is it His

burial? We are buried with Him. Is it His resurrection? We are risen

again with Him. Is it His ascension--His very session at God's right

hand? "He hath raised us up and made us sit together with Him in

heavenly places." They know nothing of St. Paul's mind who know

nothing of this image of a soul seen in the very dust of death, loved,

pardoned, quickened, elevated, crowned, throned. It was this

conception at work from the beginning in the general consciousness of

Christians which moulded round itself the order of the Christian year.

It will illustrate this idea for us if we think of the difference

between the outside and the inside of a church.

Outside on some high spire we see the light just lingering far up,

while the shadows are coldly gathering in the streets below; and we

know that it is winter. Again the evening falls warm and golden on the

churchyard, and we recognise the touch of summer. But inside it is

always God's weather; it is Christ all the year long. Now the Babe

wrapped in swaddling clothes, or circumcised with the knife of the

law, manifested to the Gentiles, or manifesting Himself with a glory

that breaks through the veil; now the Man tempted in the wilderness;

now the victim dying on the cross; now the Victor risen, ascended,

sending the Holy Spirit; now for twenty-five Sundays worshipped as the

Everlasting Word with the Father and the Holy Ghost. In this mystical

following of Christ also, the one perpetual lesson is--"he that saith

he abideth in Him, ought himself also so to walk even as He walked."

NOTES.

Ch. ii. 3-11.

Ver. 4. _A liar._] There are many things which the "sayer" says by the

language of his life rather than by his lips to others: many things

which he says to himself. "We lead ourselves astray" (i. 8). We "say"

I have knowledge of Him, while yet we observe not His commandments.

Strange that we can lie to the one being who knows the truth

thoroughly--_self_; and having lied, can get the lie believed,--

"Like one,

Who having, unto truth, by telling of it,

Made such a sinner of his memory,

To credit his own lie."

_Tempest_, Act I. Sc. 2.

Ver. 7. _Fresh._] There are two quite different words alike translated

new in A. V.: one of these is the word used here (καινος); the other

(νεος). The first always signifies _new_ in quality--intellectual,

ethical, spiritual _novelty_--that which is opposed to, which replaces

and supersedes, the antiquated, inferior, outworn; _new_ in the world

of thought. (Heb. viii. 13 states this with perfect precision.) It may

sometimes not inadequately be rendered _fresh_ ("youngly,"

Shakespeare, _Coriolanus_). The other term (νεος) is simply _recent_;

_new_ chronologically in the world of time.

_Which ye heard from the beginning._] Probably a recognition of St.

Paul's teaching at Ephesus, and of his Epistle to the Ephesians.

Ver. 8. To many commentators this verse seems almost of insoluble

difficulty. Surely, however, the meaning is clear enough for those who

will place themselves within the atmosphere of St. John's thought.

"Again a fresh commandment I am writing to you" [this commandment,

charity, is no unreal and therefore delusive standard of duty]. Taken

as one great whole (ὁ) it is true, matter of observable historical

fact, because it is realised in Him who gave the commandment; capable

of realisation, and even in measure realised in you. [And this can be

actually done by Christians, and recognised more and more by others],

"because the shadow is drifting by from the landscape even of the

world, and the light, the very light, enlighteneth by a new ideal and

a new example."

Ver. 10. _Scandal._] In Greek is the rendering of two Hebrew words.

(1) That against which we trip and stumble, a stumbling-block; (2) A

hook or snare.

Ver. 11. The terrible force of this truly Hebraistic parallelism

should be noted.

1. He that hateth his brother _is_ in darkness.

2. " " " walketh in darkness.

3. " " " knoweth not where he goeth.

4. " " " darkness has blinded his eyes.

The third beat of the parallelism contains an allusion to that Cain

among the nations, the Jewish people in our Lord's time. (John xii. 35.)

In illustration of the powerful expression, ("darkness has blinded his

eyes") the present writer quoted a striking passage from Professor

Drummond, who adduces a parallel for the Christian's loss of the

spiritual faculty, by the atrophy of organs which takes place in

moles, and in the fish in dark caverns. (_Speaker's Commentary, in

loc._) But as regards the mole at least, a great observer of Nature

entirely denies the alleged atrophy. Mr. Buckland quotes Dr. Lee in a

paper, in the Proceedings of the Royal Society, where he says,--"the

eye of the mole presents us with an instance of an organ which is

rudimentary, not by arrest of development, but through disuse, aided

perhaps by natural selection." But Mr. Buckland asserts that "the same

great Wisdom who made the mole's teeth the most beautiful set of

insectivorous teeth among animals, also made its eye fit for the work

it has to do. The mole has been designed to prey upon earthworms; they

will not come up to the surface to him, so he must go down into the

earth to them. For this purpose his eyes are fitted." (_Life of F.

Buckland_, pp. 247, 248).

FOOTNOTES:

[167] "Nomen facile supplent credentes, plenum pectus habentes memoriâ

Domini."--_Bengel_.

[168] Εκεινος in our Epistle belongs to Christ in every place but one

where it occurs (1 John ii. 6, iii. 3, 5, 7, 16, iv. 17; cf. John i.

18, ii. 21). It is very much equivalent to our reverent usage of

printing the pronoun which refers to Christ with a capital letter.

[169] Matt. vi. 45.

[170] δοξας βλασφημουντες (2 Peter ii. 10; Jude v. 8).

[171] _Poems by Matthew Arnold_ ("Rugby Chapel," Nov. 1857), vol. ii.,

pp. 251, 255.

[172] ὁς μονος συνεπαθησεν πλανωμενω κοσμω. _Acta Paul. et Thec._ 16,

_Acta. Apost. Apoc._ 47. Edit. Tischendorf.

[173] _On Liberty._ John Stuart Mill (chap. iii.).

[174] John viii. 12-35. For Apostolic usage of the word, see Acts i.

21; Rom. vi. 4; Ephes. ii. 10; Col. iii. 7.

[175] John vii. 1.

[176] "Ambulando docebat."--_Bretschneider_.

[177] John xiii. 1-6.

[178] Ἱνα ποιω ... και τελειωσω (John iv. 34).

SECTION III. (2)

GREEK. LATIN.

Αγαπητοι, ουκ εντολην Carissimi non mandatum

καινην γραφω ὑμιν, αλλ' novum scribo

εντολην παλαιαν ἡν vobis, sed mandatum

ειχετε απ' αρχης· ἡ vetus quod habuistis

εντολη ἡ παλαια εστιν ab initio: mandatum

ὁ λογος ὁν ηκουσατε. vetus est verbum quod

παλιν εντολην καινην audistis. Iterum mandatum

γραφω ὑμιν, ὁ εστιν novum scribo

αληθες εν αυτω και vobis, quod est verum

εν ὑμιν, ὁτι ἡ σκια et in ipso et in vobis,

παραγεται και το φως quoniam tenebræ transierunt

το αληθινον ηδη φαινει. et lumen verum

ὁ λεγων εν τω φωτι jam lucet. Qui dicit

ειναι και τον αδελφον se in luce esse et fratrem

αυτου μισων εν τη suum odit, in

σκοτια εστιν ἑως αρτι. tenebris est usque

αγαπων τον αδελφον adhuc. Qui diligit

αυτου εν τω φωτι μενει. f ratrem suum in lumine

και σκανδαλον εν αυτω manet, et scandalum

ουκ εστιν. ὁ δε μισων in eo non est: qui

τον αδελφον αυτου εν autem odit fratrem

τη σκοτια εστιν και εν suum, in tenebris est,

τη σκοτια περιπατει, και et in tenebris ambulat

ουκ οιδε που ὑπαγει, et nescit quo eat,

ὁτι ἡ σκοτια ετυφλωσεν quoniam tenebræ obcæcaverunt

τους οφθαλμους αυτου. oculos eius.

AUTHORISED VERSION. REVISED VERSION.

Brethren, I write Beloved, no new

no new commandment commandment write I

unto you, but an old unto you, but an old

commandment which commandment which

ye had from the beginning. ye had from the beginning:

The old commandment the old commandment

is the word is the word

which ye have heard which ye heard. Again,

from the beginning. a new commandment

Again, a new commandment write I unto you, which

I write unto thing is true in Him

you, which thing is and in you: because

true in Him and in the darkness is passing

you: because the darkness away, and the true

is past, and the light already shineth.

true light now shineth. He that saith he is in

He that saith he the light, and hateth

is in the light, and his brother, is in the

hateth his brother, is darkness even until

in darkness even until now. He that loveth

now. He that loveth his brother abideth in

his brother abideth in the light, and there is

the light, and there is none occasion of stumbling

none occasion of stumbling in him. But he

in him. But he that hateth his brother

that hateth his brother is in the darkness, and

is in darkness, and walketh in the darkness,

walketh in darkness, and knoweth not

and knoweth not whither whither he goeth, because

he goeth, because the darkness

that darkness hath hath blinded his eyes.

blinded his eyes.

ANOTHER VERSION.

Beloved, no fresh

commandment I am

writing unto you, but

an old commandment

which ye had from the

beginning. The commandment,

the old commandment,

is the word

which ye heard. Again,

a fresh commandment

I am writing unto you,

which thing [_as a whole_]

is true in Him and in

you: because the shadow

is drifting by, and

the light, the very _light_,

is already enlightening.

He that saith he is in

the light and hateth his

brother, in the darkness

is he hitherto. He

that loveth his brother

in the light abideth he,

and scandal in him

there is not. But he

that hateth his brother

in the darkness is he,

and in the darkness

walketh he, and he

knoweth not whither

he goeth because the

darkness hath blinded

his eyes.

SECTION III. (3)

GREEK. LATIN.

Γραφω ὑμιν, τεκνια, Scribo vobis, filioli,

ὁτι αφεωνται ὑμιν αι quoniam remittentur

ἁμαρτιαι δια το ὁνομα vobis, peccata propter

αυτου. γραφω ὑμιν, πατερες, nomen eius. Scribo

ὁτι εγνωκατε τον vobis, patres, quoniam

απ' αρχης. γραφω ὑμιν, cognovistis eum qui

νεανισκοι, ὁτι νενικηκατε ab initio est. Scribo

τον πονηρον. εγραψα vobis, adolescentes,

ὑμιν, παιδια, ὁτι εγνωκατε quoniam vicistis malignum.

τον πατερα. εγραψα Scribo vobis,

ὑμιν, πατερες, ὁτι infantes, quia cognovistis

εγνωκατε τον απ' αρχης. patrem. Scripsi

Εγραψα ὑμιν, νεανισκοι, vobis, iuvenes quia

ὁτι ισχυροι εστε, και fortes estis et verbum

ὁ λογος του Θεου εν Dei in vobis manet et

ὑμιν μενει, και νενικηκατε vicistis malignum. Nolite

τον πονηρον. μη αγαπατε diligere mundum

τον κοσμον, μηδε τα ne que eaquæ in mundo

εν τω κοσμω. εαν τις sunt. Si quis diligit

αγαπα τον κοσμον, ουκ mundum, non est

εστιν ἡ αγαπη του caritas Patris in eo:

πατρος εν αυτω· ὁτι quoniam omne quod in

παν το εν τω κοσμω, mundo est, concupiscentia

ἡ επιθυμια της σαρκος carnis est, et

και ἡ επιθυμια των concupiscentia oculorum,

οφθαλμων και ἡ αλαζονια et superbia vitæ;

του βιου, ουκ quæ non est ex Patre,

εστιν εκ του πατρος, sed ex mundo est. Et

αλλα εκ του κοσμου εστιν· mundus transibit et

και ὁ κοσμος παραγεται concupiscentia eius:

και ἡ επιθυμια αυτου· qui autem facit voluntatem

ὁ δε ποιων το θελημα Dei, manet in

του Θεου μενει εις τον eternum.

αιωνα.

AUTHORISED VERSION. REVISED VERSION.

I write unto you, I write unto you, my

little children, because little children, because

your sins are forgiven your sins are forgiven

you for His name's you for His name's

sake. I write unto sake. I write unto

you, fathers, because you, fathers, because

ye have known Him ye know Him that is

that is from the beginning. from the beginning. I

I write unto you, write unto you, young

young men, because ye men, because ye have

have overcome the overcome the evil one.

wicked one. I write I have written unto

unto you, little children, you, little children, because

because ye have ye know the

known the Father. I Father. I have written

have written unto you, unto you, fathers, because

fathers, because ye ye know Him

have known Him that which is from the

is from the beginning. beginning. I have

I have written unto written unto you,

you, young men, because young men, because ye

ye are strong, are strong, and the

and the word of God word of God abideth

abideth in you, and ye in you, and ye have

have overcome the overcome the evil one.

wicked one. Love not Love not the world,

the world, neither the neither the things that

things that are in the are in the world. If

world. If any man any man love the

love the world, the world, the love of the

love of the Father is Father is not in him.

not in him. For all For all that is in the

that is in the world, world, the lust of the

the lust of the flesh, flesh, and the lust of

and the lust of the the eyes, and the vainglory

eyes, and the pride of of life, is not of

life, is not of the Father, the Father, but is of

but is of the world. the world. And the

And the world passeth world passeth away,

away, and the lust and the lust thereof:

thereof: but he that but he that doeth the

doeth the will of God will of God abideth for

abideth for ever. ever.

ANOTHER VERSION.

I am writing unto

you, children, because

your sins are forgiven

you for His name's

sake. I am writing

unto you, fathers, because

ye have knowledge

of Him who is

from the beginning. I

am writing unto you,

young men, because

ye are conquerors of

the wicked one.

I have written unto

you, little children, because

ye have knowledge

of the Father. I

have written unto you,

fathers, because ye

have knowledge of Him

who is from the beginning.

I have written

unto you, young men,

because ye are strong

and the word of God

abideth in you, and ye

are conquerors of the

wicked one.

Love not the world,

neither the things that

are in the world. If

any man love the world

the love of the Father is

not in him. For all that

is in the world, the lust

of the flesh and the lust

of the eyes and the arrogancy

of living, is not

from the Father, but

from the world is it.

And the world is drifting

by, and the lust of

it: but he that is doing

the will of God abideth

for ever.

DISCOURSE VI.

_THE WORLD WHICH WE MUST NOT LOVE._

"Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If

any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For

all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of

the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but of the

world."--1 JOHN ii. 15, 16.

An adequate development of words so compressed and pregnant as these

would require a separate treatise, or series of treatises.[179] But if

we succeed in grasping St. John's conception of _the world_, we shall

have a key that will open to us this cabinet of spiritual thought.

I.

In the writings of St. John the world is always found in one or other

of four senses, as may be decided by the context. (1) It means the

creation,[180] the universe. So our Lord in His High-priestly

prayer--"Thou lovedst Me before the foundation of the world."[181] (2)

It is used for the earth _locally_ as the place where man

resides;[182] and whose soil the Son of God trod for awhile. "I am no

more in the world, but these are in the world."[183] (3) It denotes

the chief inhabitants of the earth, they to whom the counsels of God

mainly point--men universally. Such a transference is common in nearly

all languages. Both the inhabitants of a building and the material

structure which contains them, are called "a house;" and the

inhabitants are frequently bitterly blamed, while the beauty of the

structure is passionately admired. In this sense there is a

magnificent width in the word _world_. We cannot but feel indignant at

attempts to gird its grandeur within the narrow rim of a human system.

"The bread that I will give," said He who knew best, "is My flesh

which I will give for the life of the world."[184] "He is the

propitiation for the whole world," writes the Apostle at the beginning

of this chapter. In this sense, if we would imitate Christ, if we

would aspire to the Father's perfection, "love not the world" must be

tempered by that other tender oracle--"God so loved the world."[185]

In none of these senses can the world here be understood.[186]

There remains then (4) a fourth signification, which has two allied

shades of thought. World is employed to cover the whole present

existence, with its blended good and evil--susceptible of elevation by

grace, susceptible also of deeper depths of sin and ruin. But yet

again the indifferent meaning passes into one that is wholly evil,

wholly within a region of darkness. The first creation was pronounced

by God in each department "good" collectively; when crowned by God's

masterpiece in man, "very good."[187] "All things," our Apostle tells

us, "were made through Him (the Word), and without Him was not any

thing made that was made."[188] But as that was a world wholly good,

so is this a world wholly evil. This evil world is not God's creation,

drew not its origin from Him. All that is _in_ it came out _from_ it,

from nothing _higher_.[189] This wholly evil world is not the material

creation; if it were, we should be landed in dualism, or Manicheism.

It is not an entity, an actual tangible thing, a creation. It is not

of God's world that St. John cries in that last fierce word of

abhorrence which he flings at it as he sees the shadowy thing like an

evil spirit made visible in an idol's arms--"the world lieth wholly in

the evil one."[190]

This anti-world, this caricature of creation, this thing of

negations, is spun out of three abuses of the endowment of God's

glorious gift of free-will to man; out of three noble instincts

ignobly used. _First_, "the lust of the flesh"--of which flesh is the

seat, and supplies the organic medium through which it works. The

flesh is that softer part of the frame which by the network of the

nerves is intensely susceptible of pleasurable and painful sensations;

capable of heroic patient submission to the higher principles of

conscience and spirit,[191] capable also of frightful rebellion. Of

all theologians St. John is the least likely to fall into the

exaggeration of libelling the flesh as essentially evil. Is it not he

who, whether in his Gospel, or in his Epistles, delights to speak of

the _flesh_ of Jesus, to record words in which He refers to it?[192]

Still the flesh brings us into contact with all sins which are sins

that spring from, and end in, the senses. Shall we ask for a catalogue

of particulars from St. John? Nay, we cannot expect that the virgin

Apostle, who received the virgin Mother from the Virgin Lord upon the

cross, will sully his virgin pen with words so abhorred. When he has

uttered _the lust of the flesh_ his shudder is followed by an eloquent

silence. We can fill up the blank too well--drunkenness, gluttony,

thoughts and motions which spring from deliberate, wilfully cherished,

rebellious sensuality; which fill many of us with pain and fear, and

wring cries and bitter tears from penitents, and even from saints. The

_second_, abuse of free-will, the second element in this world which

is not God's world, is the desire of which the eyes are the seat--"the

lust of the eyes." To the two sins which we instinctively associate

with this phrase--voluptuousness and curiosity of the senses or the

soul--Scripture might seem to add _envy_, which derives so much of its

aliment from sight. In this lies the Christian's warning against

wilfully indulging in evil sights, bad plays, bad books, bad pictures.

He who is outwardly the spectator of these things becomes inwardly the

actor of them. The eye is, so to speak, the burning-glass of the soul;

it draws the rays from their evil brightness to a focus, and may

kindle a raging fire in the heart. Under this department comes

unregulated spiritual or intellectual curiosity. The first need not

trouble us so much as it did Christians in a more believing time.

Comparatively very few are in danger from the _planchette_ or from

astrology. But surely it is a rash thing for an ordinary mind, without

a clear call of duty, without any adequate preparation, to place its

faith within the deadly grip of some powerful adversary. People really

seem to have absolutely no conscience about reading anything--the last

philosophical Life of Christ, or the last romance; of which the titles

might be with advantage exchanged, for the philosophical history is a

light romance, and the romance is a heavy philosophy. The _third_

constituent in the evil anti-trinity of the anti-world is "the pride"

(the arrogancy, gasconade, almost swagger) "of life," of which the

lower life[193] is the seat. The thought is not so much of outward

pomp and ostentation as of that false pride which arises in the heart.

The arrogancy is within; the gasconade plays its "fantastic tricks

before high heaven." And each of these three elements (making up as

they do collectively all that is "in the world" and springing out of

the world) is not a substantive thing, not an original ingredient of

man's nature, or among the forms of God's world; it is the perversion

of an element which had a use that was noble, or at least innocent.

For first comes "the lust of the flesh." Take those two objects to

which this lust turns with a fierce and perverted passion. The

possession of flesh in itself leads man to crave for the necessary

support to his native weakness. The mutual craving for the love of

beings so like and so unlike as man and woman, if it be a weakness,

has at least a most touching and exquisite side. Again, is not a

yearning for beauty gratified through the eyes? Were they not given

for the enjoyment, for the teaching, at once high and sweet, of Nature

and of Art? Art may be a moral and spiritual discipline. The ideas of

Beauty from gifted minds by cunning hands transferred to, and stamped

upon, outward things, come from the ancient and uncreated Beauty,

whose beauty is as perfect as His truth and strength. Still further;

in the lower life, and in its lawful use, there was intended to be a

something of quiet satisfaction, a certain restfulness, at times

making us happy and triumphant. And lo! for all this, not moderate

fare and pure love, not thoughtful curiosity and the sweet pensiveness

which is the best tribute to the beautiful--not a wise humility which

makes us feel that our times are in God's hands and our means His

continual gift--but degraded senses, low art, evil literature, a pride

which is as grovelling as it is godless.

These three typical summaries of the evil tendencies in the exercise

of free-will correspond with a remarkable fulness to the two

narratives of trial which give us the compendium and general outline

of all human temptation.

Our Lord's three temptations answer to this division. The lust of the

flesh is in essence the rebellion of the lower appetites, inherent to

creaturely dependence, against the higher principle or law. The

nearest and only conceivable approach to this in the sinless Man would

be in His seeking lawful support by unlawful means--procuring food by

a miraculous exertion of power, which only would have become sinful,

or short of the highest goodness, by some condition of its exercise at

that time and in that place. An appeal to the desire for beauty and

glory, with an implied hint of using them for God's greater honour, is

the essence of the second temptation; the one possible approximation

to the "lust of the eyes" in that perfect character. The interior

deception of some touch of pride in the visible support of angels

wafting the Son of God through the air is Satan's one sinister way of

insinuating to the Saviour something akin to "the pride of life."

In the case of the other earlier typical trials it will be observed that

while the temptations fit into the same threefold framework, they are

placed in an order which exactly reverses that of St. John. For in Eden

the first approach is through "pride"; the magnificent promise of

elevation in the scale of being, of the knowledge that would win the

wonder of the spiritual world. "For God doth know that in the day ye eat

thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods,

knowing good and evil."[194] The next step is that which directs the

curiosity both of the senses and of the aspiring mind to the object

forbidden--"when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that

it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one

wise."[195] Then seems to have come some strange and sad rebellion of

the lower nature, filling their souls with shame; some bitter revelation

of the law of sin in their members; some knowledge that they were

contaminated by the "lust of the flesh."[196] The order of the

temptation in the narrative of Moses is historical; St. John's order is

moral and spiritual, answering to the facts of life. The "lust of the

flesh" which may approach the child through childish greed, grows apace.

At first it is half unconscious; then it becomes coarse and palpable. In

the man's desire acting with unregulated curiosity, through ambition of

knowledge at any price, searching out for itself books and other

instruments with deliberate desire to kindle lust, the "lust of the

eyes" ceases not its fatal influence. The crowning sin of pride with its

_selfishness_, which is self apart from God as well as from the brother,

finds its place in the "pride of life."

III.

We may now be in a position to see more clearly against _what_ world

the Primate of early Christendom pronounced his anathema, and launched

his interdict, and why?

_What_ "world" did he denounce?

Clearly _not_ the world as the creation, the universe. Not again the

earth locally. God made and ordered all things. Why should we not love

them with a holy and a blameless love? Only we should not love them in

themselves; we should not cling to them forgetting Him. Suppose that

some husband heaped beautiful and costly presents upon his wife whom

he loved. At last with the intuition of love he begins to see what is

the secret of such cold imitation of love as that icy heart can give.

She loves _him_ not--his riches, not the man; his gifts, not the

giver. And thus loving with that frigid love which has no heart in it,

there is no true love; her heart is another's. Gifts are given that

the giver may be loved in them. If it is true that "gifts are nought

when givers prove unkind," it is also true that there is a sort of

adultery of the heart when the taker is unkind--because the gift is

valuable, not because the bestower is dear.[197] And so the world,

God's beautiful world, now becomes to us an idol. If we are so lost in

the procession of Nature, in the march of law, in the majestic growth,

in the stars above and in the plants below, that we forget the

Lawgiver, who from such humble beginnings has brought out a world of

beauty and order; if with modern poets we find content, calm,

happiness, purity, rest, simply in contemplating the glaciers, the

waves, and the stars; then we look at the world even in this sense in

a way which is a violation of St. John's rule. Yet again, the world

which is now condemned is not humanity. There is no real Christianity

in taking black views, and speaking bitter things, about the human

society to which we belong, and the human nature of which we are

partakers. No doubt Christianity believes that man "is very far gone

from original righteousness;" that there is a "corruption in the

nature of every man that naturally is engendered of the offspring of

Adam." Yet the utterers of unwholesome apophthegms, the suspecters of

their kind, are not Christian thinkers. The philosophic historian,

whose gorge rose at the doctrine of the Fall, thought much worse of

man practically than the Fathers of the Church. They bowed before

martyrdom and purity, and believed in them with a child-like faith.

For Gibbon, the martyr was not quite so true, nor the virgin quite so

pure, nor the saint quite so holy. He Who knew human nature best, Who

has thrown that terrible ray of light into the unlit gulf of the heart

when He tells us "what proceeds out of the heart of man,"[198] had yet

the ear which was the first to hear the trembling of the one chord

that yet kept healthful time and tune in the harlot's passionate

heart. He believed that man was recoverable; lost, but capable of

being found. After all, in this sense there is something worthy of

love in man. "God so _loved_" (not so _hated_) "the world, that He

gave His only begotten Son." Shall we say that _we_ are to hate the

world which He loved?

And now we come to that world which God never loved, never will love,

never will reconcile to Himself,--which we are not to love.

This is most important to see; for there is always a danger in setting

out with a stricter standard than Christ's, a narrower road than the

narrow one which leads to heaven. Experience proves that they who begin

with standards of duty which are impossibly high end with standards of

duty which are sometimes sadly low. Such men have tried the

impracticable, and failed; the practicable seems to be too hard for them

ever afterwards. They who begin by anathematising the world in things

innocent, indifferent, or even laudable, not rarely end by a reaction of

thought which believes that the world is nothing and nowhere.

But there is such a thing as the world in St. John's sense--an evil

world brought into existence by the abuse of our free-will; filled by

the anti-trinity, by "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and

the pride of life."

Let us not confuse "the world" with the earth, with the whole race of

man, with general society, with any particular set, however much some

sets are to be avoided. Look at the thing fairly. Two people, we will

say, go to London, to live there. One, from circumstances of life and

position, naturally falls into the highest social circle. Another has

introductions to a smaller set, with an apparently more serious

connection. Follow the first some evening. He drives to a great

gathering. The room which he enters is ablaze with light; jewelled

orders sparkle upon men's coats, and fair women move in exquisite

dresses. We look at the scene and we say--"what worldly society has

the man fallen into!" Perhaps so, in a sense. But about the same time

the other walks to a little room with humbler adjuncts, where a grave

and apparently serious circle meet together. We are able to look in

there also, and we exclaim--"this is serious society, unworldly

society." Perhaps so again. Yet let us read the letters of Mary

Godolphin. She bore a life unspotted by the world in the dissolute

court of Charles II., because the love of the Father was in her. In

small serious circles are there no hidden lusts which blaze up in

scandals? Is there no vanity, no pride, no hatred? In the world of

Charles II.'s court Mary Godolphin lived out of the world which God

hated; in the religious world not a few, certainly, live in the world

which is not God's. For once more, the world is not so much a

place--though at times its power seems to have been drawn into one

intense focus, as in the empire of which Rome was the centre, and

which may have been in the Apostle's thought in the following verse.

In the truest and deepest sense the world consists of our own

spiritual surrounding; it is the place which we make for our own

souls. No walls that ever were reared can shut out the world from us;

the "Nun of Kenmare" found that it followed her into the seemingly

spiritual retreat of a severe Order. The world in its essence is

subtler and thinner than the most infinitesimal of the bacterian germs

in the air. They can be strained off by the exquisite apparatus of a

man of science. At a certain height they cease to exist. But the world

may be wherever we are; we carry it with us wherever we go, it lasts

while our lives last. No consecration can utterly banish it even from

within the church's walls; it dares to be round us while we kneel, and

follows us into the presence of God.

(2) Why does God hate this "world"--the world in this sense? St. John

tells us. "If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in

him." Deep in every heart must be one or other of two loves. There is

no room for two master-passions. There is an expulsive power in all

true affection. What tenderness and pathos, how much of expostulation,

more potent because reserved--"the love of the Father is not in him"!

He has told all his "little ones" that he has written to them because

they "know the Father." St. John does not use sacred names at random.

Even Voltaire felt that there was something almost awful in hearing

Newton pronounce the name of God. Such in an incomparably higher

degree is the spirit of St. John. In this section he writes of "the

love of the _Father_,"[199] and of the "will of _God_."[200] The first

title has more sweetness than majesty; the second more majesty than

sweetness.[201] He would throw into his plea some of the winningness

of one who uses this as a resistless argument with a tempted but

loving child--an argument often successful when every other fails. "If

you do this, your Father will not love you; you will not be His

child." We have but to read this with the hearts of God's dear

children. Then we shall find that if the "love not" of this verse

contains "words of extirpation;"[202] it ends with others which are

intended to draw us with cords of a man, and with bands of love.

FOOTNOTES:

[179] After all deductions for the lack of accurate and searching

textual exegesis, perhaps Bossuet's "Traité de la concupiscence, ou

Exposition de ces Paroles de Saint Jean, 1 John ii. 15-17" (_Œuvres de

Bossuet_, Tom. vii., 380-420), remains unrivalled.

[180] The word κοσμος originally signified ornament (chiefly perhaps

of dress); figuratively it came to denote order. It was first applied

by Pythagoras to the _universe_, from the conception of the order,

which reigns in it (Plut., _de Plac. Phil._, ii. 1). From schools of

philosophy it passed into the language of poets and writers of

elevated prose. It is somewhat singular that the Romans, possibly from

Greek influence, came to apply "mundus" by the same process to _the

world_, as it had also originally signified _ornament_, especially of

female dress (See Richard Bentley against Boyle, _Opera Philol._,

347-445, and Notes, Humboldt's _Cosmos_, xiii.). In the LXX. κοσμος

does not appear as the translation of שׂלָמ its spiritual equivalent

in Hebrew; but very often in the sense of "ornament" and "order." (See

Tromm., _Concord. Gr. in LXX_., 1, 913), but it is found as _world_

several times in the Apocrypha (Wisdom vi. 26, vii. 18, ix. 3, xi. 18,

xv. 14; 2 Mac. iii. 12, vii. 9-23, viii. 18, xiii. 14).

[181] John xvii. 24.

[182] In Hebrew תֵּבֵל habitable globe; translated οικουμενη in LXX.

(see Psalm lxxxix. 11).

[183] John v. 11.

[184] John vi. 31; 1 John ii. 2.

[185] John iii. 16. It may be added that these are passages where the

_world_ as humanity generally passes into the darker meaning of that

portion of it which is actively hostile to God. John xv. 18, 19.

[186] See note on ver. 16 at the end of the next Discourse.

[187] Gen. i. 31.

[188] John i. 3.

[189] The writer does not happen to remember any commentator who has

pointed out this subtle but powerful thought, παν το εν τω κοσμω--εκ

του κοσμου εστιν (1 John ii. 16).

[190] 1 John v. 19.

[191] John xiv. 1; 1 John iv. 2, 3; 2 John 7.

[192] John vi. 51, 53-56; 1 John iv. 2, 3; 2 John 7.

[193] ἡ αλαζονια του βιου.

[194] Gen. iii. 5.

[195] Gen. iii. 6.

[196] Gen. iii. 7.

[197] S. Augustin., _Tract. in Joann. Epist._

[198] Mark vii. 21.

[199] 1 John ii. 15, 16.

[200] Ibid. ver. 17.

[201] No portion of Prof. Westcott's Commentary is more thorough or

more exquisite than his exposition here. (_Epistles of St. John_, 66.)

[202] "_Extirpantia verba._" St. August (in loc.).

DISCOURSE VII.

_USE AND ABUSE OF THE SENSE OF THE VANITY OF THE WORLD._

"The world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth

the will of God abideth for ever."--1 JOHN ii. 17.

The connection of the passage in which these words occur is not

difficult to trace, for those who are used to follow those "roots

below the stream," those real rather than verbal links latent in the

substance of St. John's thoughts. He addresses those whom he has in

view with a paternal authority, as his "sons" in the faith--with an

endearing variation as "little children." He reminds them of the

wisdom and strength involved in their Christian life. Theirs is the

sweetest flower of knowledge--"to know the Father." Theirs is the

grandest crown of victory--"to overcome the wicked one." But there

remains an enemy in one sense more dangerous than the evil one--the

world. By the world in this place we are to understand that element in

the material and human sphere, in the region of mingled good and evil,

which is external to God, to the influence of His Spirit, to the

boundaries of His Church--nay, which frequently passes over those

boundaries. In this sense it is, so to speak, a fictitious world, a

world of wills separated from God because dominated by self; a shadowy

caricature of creation; an anti-kosmos, which the Author of the kosmos

has not made. What has been well called "the great love not" rings

out--"love not the world." For this admonition two reasons of ever

enduring validity are given by St. John. (1) The application of the

law of human nature, that two master-passions cannot co-exist in one

man. "If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in

him." (2) The unsatisfactory nature of the world, its incurable

transitoriness, its "visible tendency to non-existence." "The world

passeth away, and the lust thereof."

It will be well to consider how far this thought of the transitoriness

of the world, of its drifting by in ceaseless change, is in itself

salutary and Christian, how far it needs to be supplemented and

elevated by that which follows and closes the verse.[203]

I.

There can be no doubt, then, that up to a certain point this

conviction is a necessary element of Christian thought, feeling, and

character; that it is at least among the preliminaries of a saving

reception of Christ.

There is in the great majority of the world a surprising and almost

incredible levity. There is a disposition to believe in the permanency

of that which we have known to continue long, and which has become

habitual. There is a tale of a man who was resolved to keep from his

children the knowledge of _death_. He was the Governor of a colony,

and had lost in succession his wife and many children. Two only, mere

infants, were left. He withdrew to a beautiful and secluded island,

and tried to barricade his daughters from the fatal knowledge which,

when once acquired, darkens the spirit with anticipation. In the

ocean-island death was to be a forbidden word. If met with in the

pages of a book, and questions were asked, no answer was to be given.

If some one expired, the body was to be removed, and the children were

to be told that the departed had gone to another country. It does not

need much imagination to feel sure that the secret could not be kept;

that some fish lying on the coral reef, or some bright bird killed in

the tropic forest, gave the little ones the hint of a something that

touched the splendour of the sunset with a strange presentiment; that

some hour came when, as to the rest of us, so to them, the mute

presence would insist upon being made known. Ours is a stranger mode

of dealing with ourselves than was the father's way of dealing with

his children. We tacitly resolve to play a game of make-believe with

ourselves, to forget that which cannot be forgotten, to remove to an

incalculable distance that which is inexorably near. And the fear of

death with us does not come from the nerves, but from the will. Death

ushers us into the presence of God. Those of whom we speak hate and

fear death because they fear God, and hate His presence. Now it is

necessary for such persons as these to be awakened from their

illusion. That which is supremely important for them is to realise

that "the world" is indeed "drifting by;" that there is an emptiness

in all that is created, a vanity in all that is not eternal; that time

is short, eternity long. They must be brought to see that with the

world, the "lust thereof" (the concupiscence, the lust of it, which

has the world for its object, which belongs to it, and which the world

stimulates) passes by also. The world, which is the object of the

desire, is a phantom and a shadow; the desire itself must be therefore

the phantom of a phantom and the shadow of a shadow.

This conviction has a thousand times over led human souls to the one

true abiding centre of eternal reality. It has come in a thousand

ways. It has been said that one heard the fifth chapter of Genesis

read, with those words eight times repeated over the close of each

record of longevity, like the strokes of a funeral bell, "_and he

died_;" and that the impression never left him, until he planted his

foot upon the rock over the tide of the changing years. Sometimes this

conviction is produced by the death of friends--sometimes by the slow

discipline of life--sometimes no doubt it may be begun, sometimes

deepened, by the preacher's voice upon the watch-night, by the

effective ritualism of the tolling bell, of the silent prayer, of the

well-selected hymn. And it is right that the world's dancing in, or

drinking in, the New Year, should be a hint to Christians to pray it

in. This is one of the happy plagiarisms which the Church has made

from the world. The heart feels as it never did before the truth of

St. John's sad, calm, oracular survey of existence. "The world passeth

away, and the lust thereof."

II.

But we have not sounded the depth of the truth--certainly we have not

exhausted St. John's meaning--until we have asked something more. Is

this conviction alone always a herald of salvation? Is it always, taken

by itself, even salutary? Can it never be exaggerated, and become the

parent of evils almost greater than those which it supersedes?

We are led by careful study of the Bible to conclude that this

sentiment of the flux of things _is_ capable of exaggeration. For

there is one important principle which arises from a comparison of the

Old Testament with the New in this matter.

It is to be noticed that the Old Testament has indefinitely more which

corresponds to the first proposition of the text, without the

qualification which follows it, than we can find in the New.

The patriarch Job's experience echoes in our ears. "Man that is born

of a woman hath but a short time to live, and is full of misery. He

cometh up, and is cut down, like a flower; he fleeth as it were a

shadow, and never continueth in one stay."[204] The Funeral Psalms

make their melancholy chant. "Behold, Thou hast made my days as it

were a span long.... Verily every man living is altogether vanity. For

man walketh in a vain shadow, and disquieteth himself in vain.... O

spare me a little that I may smile again."[205] Or we read the words

of Moses, the man of God, in that ancient psalm of his, that hymn of

time and of eternity. All that human speech can say is summed up in

four words, the truest, the deepest, the saddest and the most

expressive, that ever fell from any mortal pen. "We bring our years to

an end, as a sigh."[206] Each life is a sigh between two eternities!

Our point is, that in the New Testament there is greatly less of this

element--greatly less of this pathetic moralising upon the vanity and

fragility of human life, of which we have only cited a few

examples--and that what there is lies in a different atmosphere, with

sunnier and more cheerful surroundings. Indeed, in the whole compass

of the New Testament there is perhaps but one passage which is set

quite in the same key with our familiar declamations upon the

uncertainty and shortness of human life--where St. James desires

Christians ever to remember in all their projects to make deduction

for the will of God, "not knowing what shall be on the morrow."[207]

In the New Testament the voice, which wails for a second about the

changefulness and misery, is lost in the triumphant music by which it

is encompassed. If earthly goods are depreciated, it is not merely

because "the load of them troubles, the love of them taints, the loss

of them tortures;"[208] it is because better things are ready. There

is no lamentation over the change, no clinging to the dead past. The

tone is rather one of joyful invitation. "Your raft is going to pieces

in the troubled sea of time; step into a gallant ship. The volcanic

isle on which you stand is undermined by silent fires; we can promise

to bring you with us to a shore of safety where you shall be compassed

about with songs of deliverance."

It is no doubt true to urge that this style of thought and language is

partly to be ascribed to a desire that the attention of Christians

should be fixed on the return of their Lord, rather than upon their

own death. But, if we believe Scripture to have been written under

Divine guidance, the history of religion may supply us with good

grounds for the absence of all exaggeration from its pages in speaking

of the misery of life and the transitoriness of the world.

The largest religious experiment in the world, the history of a

religion which at one time numerically exceeded Christendom, is a

gigantic proof that it is _not_ safe to allow unlimited licence to

melancholy speculation. The true symbol for humanity is not a skull

and an hour glass.

Some two thousand five hundred years ago, towards the end of the

seventh century before Christ, at the foot of the mountains of Nepaul,

in the capital of a kingdom of Central India, an infant was born whom

the world will never forget. All gifts seemed to be showered on this

child. He was the son of a powerful king and heir to his throne. The

young Siddhârtha was of rare distinction, brave and beautiful, a

thinker and a hero, married to an amiable and fascinating princess.

But neither a great position nor domestic happiness could clear away

the cloud of melancholy which hung over Siddhârtha, even under that

lovely sky. His deep and meditative soul dwelt night and day upon the

mystery of existence. He came to the conclusion that the life of the

creature is incurably evil from three causes--from the very fact of

existence, from desire, and from ignorance. The things revealed by

sense are evil. None has that continuance and fixity which is the mark

of _Law_, and the attainment of which is the condition of happiness.

At last his resolution to leave all his splendour and become an

ascetic was irrevocably fixed. One splendid morning the prince drove

to a glorious garden. On his road he met a repulsive old man,

wrinkled, toothless, bent. Another day, a wretched being wasted with

fever crossed his path. Yet a third excursion--and a funeral passes

along the road with a corpse on an open bier, and friends wailing as

they go. His favourite attendant is obliged in each case to confess

that these evils are not exceptional--that old age, sickness, and

death, are the fatal conditions of conscious existence for all the

sons of men. Then the Prince Royal takes his first step towards

becoming the deliverer of humanity. He cries--"woe, woe to the youth

which old age must destroy, to the health which sickness must

undermine, to the life which has so few days and is so full of evil."

Hasty readers are apt to judge that the Prince was on the same track

with the Patriarch of Idumea, and with Moses the man of God in the

desert--nay, with St. John, when he writes from Ephesus that "the

world passeth away, and the lust thereof."

It may be well to reconsider this; to see what contradictory principle

lies under utterances which have so much superficial resemblance.

Siddhârtha became known as the Bouddha, the august founder of a great

and ancient religion. That religion has of later years been favourably

compared with Christianity--yet what are its necessary results, as drawn

out for us by those who have studied it most deeply? Scepticism, fanatic

hatred of life, incurable sadness in a world fearfully misunderstood;

rejection of the personality of man, of God, of the reality of Nature.

Strange enigma! The Bouddha sought to win annihilation by good works;

everlasting non-being by a life of purity, of alms, of renunciation, of

austerity. The prize of his high calling was not everlasting life, but

everlasting death; for what else is impersonality, unconsciousness,

absorption into the universe, but the negation of human existence? The

acceptance of the principles of Bouddhism is simply a sentence of death

intellectually, morally, spiritually, almost physically, passed upon the

race which submits to the melancholy bondage of its creed of desolation.

It is the opium drunkenness of the spiritual world without the dreams

that are its temporary consolation. It is enervating without being soft,

and contemplative without being profound. It is a religion which is

spiritual without recognising the soul, virtuous without the conception

of duty, moral without the admission of liberty, charitable without

love. It surveys a world without nature, and a universe without

God.[209] The human soul under its influence is not so much drunken as

asphyxiated by a monotonous unbalanced perpetual repetition of one half

of the truth--"the world passeth away, and the lust thereof."

For let us carefully note that St. John adds a qualification which

preserves the balance of truth. Over against the dreary contemplation

of the perpetual flux of things, he sets a constant course of

_doing_--over against the _world_, God in His deepest, truest

personality, "_the will of God_"--over against the fact of our having

a short time to live, and being full of misery, an everlasting

_fixity_, "_he abideth for ever_"--(so well brought out by the old

gloss which slipped into the Latin text, "even as God abideth for

ever"). As the Lord had taught before, so the disciple now teaches, of

the rocklike solidity, of the permanent abiding, under and over him

who "_doeth_." Of the devotee who became in his turn the Bouddha,

Çakhya-Mouni could not have said one word of the close of our text.

"_He_"--but human personality is lost in the triumph of knowledge.

"_Doeth the will of God_"--but God is ignored, if not denied.[210]

"_Abideth for ever_"--but that is precisely the object of his

aversion, the terror from which he wishes to be emancipated at any

price, by any self-denial.

It may be supposed that this strain of thought is of little practical

importance. It may be of use, indeed, in other lands to the missionary

who is brought into contact with forms of Bouddhism in China, India, or

Ceylon, but not to us in these countries. In truth it is not so. It is

about half a century ago since a great English theologian warned his

University that the central principle of Bouddhism was being spread far

and wide in Europe from Berlin. This propaganda is not confined to

philosophy. It is at work in literature generally, in poetry, in novels,

above all in those collections of "Pensées" which have become so

extensively popular. The unbelief of the last century advanced with

flashing epigrams and defiant songs. With Byron it softened at times

into a melancholy which was perhaps partly affected. But with Amiel, and

others of our own day, unbelief assumes a sweet and dirge-like tone. The

satanic mirth of the past unbelief is exchanged for a satanic melancholy

in the present. Many currents of thought run into our hearts, and all

are tinged with a darkness before unknown from new substances in the

soil which colours the waters. There is little fear of our not hearing

enough, great fear of our hearing too much, of the proposition--"the

world passeth away, and the lust thereof."

All this may possibly serve as some explanation for the fact that the

Christian Church, as such, has no fast for the last day of the year,

no festival for New Year's Day except one quite unconnected with the

lessons which may be drawn from the flight of time. The death of the

old year, the birth of the new year, have touching associations for

us. But the Church consecrates no death but that of Jesus and His

martyrs, no nativity but that of her Lord, and of one whose birth was

directly connected with His own--John the Baptist.[211] A cause of

this has been found in the fact that the day had become so deeply

contaminated by the abominations of the heathen _Saturnalia_ that it

was impossible in the early Church to continue any very marked

observation of it. This may well be so; but it is worth considering

whether there is not another and deeper reason. Nothing that has now

been said can be supposed to militate against the observance of this

time by Christians in private, with solemn penitence for the

transgressions of the past year, and earnest prayer for that upon

which we enter--nothing against the edification of particular

congregations by such services as those most striking ones which are

held in so many places. But some explanation is supplied why the

"Watch-night" is not recognised in the calendar of the Church.

Let us take our verse together as a whole and we have something better

than moralising over the flight of time and the transitoriness of the

world; something better than vulgarising "vanity of vanities" by vapid

iteration.

It is hard to conceive a life in which death and evanescence have

nothing that enforces their recognition. Now the removal of one dear

to us, now a glance at the obituary with the name of some one of

almost the same age as ourselves, brings a sudden shadow over the

sunniest field. Yet surely it is not wholesome to encourage the

perpetual presence of the cloud. We might impose upon ourselves the

penance of being shut up all a winter's night with a corpse, go half

crazy with terror of that unearthly presence, and yet be no more

spiritual after all.[212] We must learn to look at death in a

different way, with new eyes. We all know how different dead faces

are. Some speak to us merely of material ugliness, of the sweep of

"decay's effacing fingers." In others a new idea seems to light up the

face; there is the touch of a superhuman irradiation, of a beauty from

a hidden life. We feel that we look on one who has seen Christ, and

say--"we shall be like Him, for we shall see Him as He is." These two

kinds of faces answer to the two different views of life.

Not the transitory, but the permanent; not the fleeting, but the

abiding; not death but life, is the conclusion of the whole matter.

The Christian life is not an initial spasm followed by a chronic

dyspepsia. What does St. John give us as the picture of it

exemplified in a believer? Daily, perpetual, constant doing the will

of God. This is the end far beyond--somewhat inconsistent

with--obstinately morbid meditation and surrounding ourselves with

multiplied images of mortality. Lying in a coffin half the night might

not lead to that end; nay, it might be a hindrance thereto. Beyond the

grave, outside the coffin, is the object at which we are to look. "The

current of things temporal," cries Augustine, "sweeps along. But like

a tree over that stream has risen our Lord Jesus Christ. He willed to

plant Himself as it were over the river. Are you whirled along by the

current? Lay hold of the wood. Does the love of the world roll you

onward in its course? Lay hold upon Christ. For you He became temporal

that you might become eternal. For He was so made temporal as to

remain eternal. Join thy heart to the eternity of God, and thou shalt

be eternal with Him."

Those who have heard the Miserere in the Sistine Chapel describe the

desolation which settles upon the soul which surrenders itself to the

impression of the ritual. As the psalm proceeds, at the end of each

rhythmical pulsation of thought, each beat of the alternate wings of

the parallelism, a light upon the altar is extinguished. As the wail

grows sadder the darkness grows deeper. When all the lights are out

and the last echo of the strain dies away, there would be something

suitable for the penitent's mood in the words--"the world passeth

away, and the lust thereof." Upon the altar of the Christian heart

there are tapers at first unlighted, and before it a priest in black

vestments. But one by one the vestments are exchanged for others which

are white; one after another the lamps are lighted slowly and without

noise, until gradually, we know not how, the whole place is full of

light. And ever sweeter and clearer, calm and happy, with a triumph

which is at first repressed and reverential, but which increases as

the light becomes diffused, the words are heard strong and quiet--a

plain-song now that will swell into an anthem presently--"he that

doeth the will of God abideth for ever."

NOTES.

Ch. ii. 12-17.

Ver. 12, 13, 14. These verses cannot properly be divided so as to

embrace three departments of spiritual, answering to three departments

of natural, life. All believers are addressed _authoritatively_ as

"children" in the faith, _tenderly_ as "little children;" then

subdivided into two classes only, "fathers," and "young men."

_Confirmation_ is justly found implied here.

Ver. 16. Hardy's comment is quaint, and interesting. "These three are

'all that is in the world;' they are the world's cursed trinity;

according to that of the poet,

Ambitiosus honos, et opes, et fœda voluptas;

Hæc tria pro trino numine mundus habet,

which wicked men adore and worship as deities; in which regard Lapide

opposeth them to the three persons in the blessed Trinity: the lust of

the eyes to the Father, who is liberal in communicating His essence to

the Son and the Spirit; the lust of the flesh to the Son, whose

generation is spiritual and eternal; the pride of life to the Holy

Ghost, who is the Spirit of humility. That golden calf, which, being

made, was set up and worshipped by the Israelites in the wilderness,

is not unfitly made use of to represent these: the calf, which is a

wanton creature, an emblem of the lust of flesh; the gold of the calf,

referring to the lust of the eyes; and the exalting it, to the pride

of life. Oh, how do the most of men fall down before this golden calf

which the world erecteth."

In tracing the various senses of "the world" we have not dwelt

prominently upon the conception of the world as embodied in the Roman

Empire, and in the city of Rome as its seat--an empire standing over

against the Church as the Kingdom of God. The αλαζονια του βιου may be

projected outwardly, and set in a material framework in the gorgeous

description of the wealth and luxury of Rome in Apoc. xviii. 11-14. M.

Rénan finds in the Apocalypse the cry of horror of a witness who has

been at Rome, seen the martyrdom of brethren, and been himself near

death. (Apoc. i. 9, vi. 9, xiii. 10, xx. 4; cf. _L'Antechrist_, pp.

197, 199. Surely Apoc. xviii. 20 adds a strong testimony to the

martyrdom of Peter and Paul at Rome.) So early a witness as Tertullian

gives the story of St. John's having been plunged into the boiling oil

without injury to him before his exile at Patmos. (_De Præscr. Hær._,

36). The Apocryphal 'Acta Iohannis' (known to Eusebius and to St.

Augustine), relates at length an interview at Rome between Domitian

and St. John--not without interest, in spite of some miraculous

embellishment. _Acta. Apost. Apoc._ Tischendorf, 266-271.

FOOTNOTES:

[203] παραγεται. It has been said that this is not the real point;

that what St. John here describes is not the general attribute of the

world as transitory, but its condition at the moment when the Epistle

was written, in presence of the manifestation of "the kingdom of God,

which was daily shining forth." But surely the world can scarcely be

so completely identified with the temporary framework of the Roman

Empire; and the _universality_ of the antithesis (ὁ δε ποιων κ.τ.λ.)

and its intensely _individual_ form, lead us to take κοσμος in that

universal and inclusive signification which alone is of abiding

interest to every age.

[204] Job xiv. 1, 2. Cf. x. 20-22.

[205] Such seems to be the meaning of אַבְלִינָה (Ps. xxxix. 14).

[206] Ps. xc. 9.

[207] James iv. 13-17. The passage 1 Pet. i. 25 is taken from the

magnificent prophecy in which the fragility of all flesh, transitory

as the falling away of the flowers of grass into impalpable dust, is

contrasted with the eternity of the word of God. Isa. xl. 6, 7, LXX.

[208] "Possessa onerant, amata inquinant, amissa cruciant."--_St.

Bernard_.

[209] The view here taken of Bouddhism follows that of M. J.

Barthelemy St. Hilaire. _Le Bouddha et sa Réligion._ Prémière partie,

chap. v., pp. 141-182.

[210] "These populations neither deny nor affirm God. They simply

ignore Him. To assert that they are atheists would be very much the

same thing as to assert that they are anti-Cartesians. As they are

neither for nor against Descartes, so they are neither for nor against

God. They are just children. A child is neither atheist nor deist. He

is nothing."--Voltaire, _Dict. Phil._, Art. _Athêisme_.

[211] It is noteworthy that in the collects in the English Prayer-Book,

and indeed in its public formularies generally (outside the Funeral

Service, and that for the Visitation of the Sick), there are but two

places in which the note of the "world passeth away" is very prominently

struck, viz., the Collect for the Fourth Sunday after Easter, and one

portion of the prayer for "The Church Militant." One of the most

wholesome and beautiful expressions of the salutary convictions arising

from Christian perception of this melancholy truth is to be found in Dr.

Johnson's "Prayer for the Last Day in the Year," as given in Mr.

Stobart's _Daily Services for Christian Households_, pp. 99, 100.

[212] The old "Memento Mori" timepiece of Mary, Queen of Scots, is a

watch in the interior of a death's-head, which opens to disclose it.

Surely not a symbol likely to make any soul happier or better!

Expositor's Bible: The Epistles of St. John · 第 1 / 9 章