ON SCREENS IN ITALY AND SPAIN.

I commence with Italy, first, because it has been the fountain from

whence Catholic truth has flowed to other parts of Christendom, and

secondly, as I believe it is a very general delusion that screens formed

no part of the fittings of a Roman church.

As an overwhelming contradiction to this often-repeated error, I produce

a representation of the great screen in old St. Peter's, from the most

irrefragable authority,[7] from which it will be seen that a _double_

marble wall was erected, about six feet high, and twelve feet apart,

that on these walls stood twelve porphyry pillars, supporting a

transverse cornice surmounted with standards for lights. Moreover, at

the neck of these pillars, under the cap, rods were extended for the

suspension of lamps, which were kept perpetually burning in honour of

the Apostles, whose relics lay beneath the high altar.

This altar, as will be seen by the plan, stood considerably within the

screen, surrounded by pillars, and covered by a ciborium. The back of

the altar is turned towards the nave, with a cross and candlesticks upon

it, and must have effectually concealed the celebrant from the people;

behind all this is seen the great apse, with the cathedra for the pope,

mosaic ceiling, and usual decorations.

This is the most important authority for the use of screens in the

ancient Roman church; and the dignity and sanctity of the old basilica

of St. Peter was so great, that it would be naturally considered as the

type for other churches; moreover, if we except the details which belong

to the early period of its erection, it is a perfect type of a Pointed

screen,—convert the twelve pillars into shafts, surmount them with

arches, and terminate them by a bratishing, and we have a work of the

mediæval period. It is also exceedingly interesting to observe that this

screen is surmounted by standards for wax tapers, and many lamps were

suspended from it. The most modern screens of the seventeenth and

eighteenth century still preserve these features, and the traditional

arrangement has lasted from the reign of the emperor Constantine down to

our time. It will be seen by the plate which represents the screen, that

the altar is covered with an elevated ciborium, raised on four pillars,

connected by rods, from which veils of silk and precious stuffs were

suspended. It may be useful to remark, that, although as I have before

said, the altar itself was never shut off purposely from the sight of

the people, yet it is most certain that all altars were provided with

these veils or curtains, which were closely drawn during the

consecration. There is especial mention of the gifts of such curtains by

the early popes to the altars of churches in Rome;[8] and though this

rite has been long disused, yet the lateral curtains, suspended on rods,

which still hang in many continental churches, are remains of the

ancient reverential practice. It is greatly to be desired that these

ciborium altars were more generally revived in our times, especially for

the reservation of the holy sacrament. Their vaulted coverings are not

only most majestic in appearance, but they are practically useful in

preventing the deposition of dust on the altar and tabernacle. In all

cases, side curtains should be retained for altars in lateral chapels,

as they preserve the celebrant from distraction, and protect the tapers,

&c., from currents of air. But to answer these ends, it is essential

that the curtains should be suspended nearly at right angles to the

reredos, and not expanded flat against the walls, as may be seen in some

churches of our own time.

A Treatise on Chancel Screens and Rood Lofts Their Antiquity, Use, and Symbolic Signification · 第 15 / 102 题