The filament was improved by coating it with graphite. One method,

adopted about 1888, was to dip it in a hydrocarbon liquid before

carbonizing. Another, more generally adopted in 1893 was a process

originally invented by Sawyer, one of the Americans who had attempted

to “sub-divide the electric light” in 1878–79. This process consisted

of passing current through a carbonized filament in an atmosphere of

hydrocarbon vapor. The hot filament decomposed the vapor, depositing

graphite on the filament. The graphite coated filament improved it so

it could operate at 3½ lumens per watt (initial efficiency). Lamps of

20, 24, 32 and 50 candlepower were developed for 110-volt circuits.

Lamps in various sizes from 12 to 36 cp were made for use on storage

batteries having various numbers of cells and giving a voltage of

from 20 to 40 volts. Miniature lamps of from ½ to 2 cp for use on dry

batteries of from 2½ to 5½ volts, and 3 to 6 cp on 5½ to 12 volts, were

also made. These could also be connected in series on 110 volts for

festoons. Very small lamps of ½ cp of 2 to 4 volts for use in dentistry

and surgery were made available. These miniature lamps had no bases,

wires being used to connect them to the circuit.

[Illustration: STANDARD EDISON LAMP, 1894.

This lamp had a “treated” cellulose filament, permitting an efficiency

of 3½ lumens per watt which has never been exceeded in a carbon

lamp. This lamp is in the exhibit of Edison lamps in the Smithsonian

Institution.]

Lamps for 220-volt circuits were developed as this voltage was

desirable for power purposes, electric motors being used, and a few

lamps were needed on such circuits. They are less efficient and more

expensive than 110-volt lamps, their use being justified however

only when it is uneconomical to have a separate 110-volt circuit for

lighting. The lamps were made in sizes from 16 to 50 candlepower.

[Illustration:

Edison. Thomson-Houston. Westinghouse. Brush-Swan.

Edi-Swan Edi-Swan United States. Hawkeye.

(single contact). (double contact).

Ft. Wayne Jenny. Mather or Perkins. Loomis.

Schaeffer or National. Indianapolis Jenny. Siemens & Halske.

VARIOUS STANDARD BASES IN USE, 1892.]

[Illustration: THOMSON-HOUSTON SOCKET.]

[Illustration: WESTINGHOUSE SOCKET.]

Electric street railway systems used a voltage in the neighborhood of

550, and lamps were designed to burn five in series on this voltage.

These lamps were different from the standard 110-volt lamps although

they were made for about this voltage. As they were burned in series,

the lamps were selected to operate at a definite current instead of

at a definite voltage, so that the lamps when burned in series would

operate at the proper temperature to give proper life results. Such

lamps would therefore vary considerably in individual volts, and

hence would not give good service if burned on 110-volt circuits. The

candelabra screw base and socket and the miniature screw base and

socket were later developed. Ornamental candelabra base lamps were made

for use direct on 110 volts, smaller sizes being operated in series

on this voltage. The former gave about 10 cp, the latter in various

sizes from 4 to 8 cp. The miniature screw base lamps were for low volt

lighting.

[Illustration:

Thomson-Houston. Westinghouse.

ADAPTERS FOR EDISON SCREW SOCKETS, 1892.

Next to the Edison base, the Thomson-Houston and Westinghouse bases

were the most popular. By use of these adapters, Edison base lamps

could be used in T-H and Westinghouse sockets.]

The various manufacturers of lamps in nearly every instance made bases

that were very different from one another. No less than fourteen

different standard bases and sockets came into commercial use.

These were known as, Brush-Swan, Edison, Edi-Swan (double contact),

Edi-Swan (single contact), Fort Wayne Jenny, Hawkeye, Indianapolis

Jenny, Loomis, Mather or Perkins, Schaeffer or National, Siemens &

Halske, Thomson-Houston, United States and Westinghouse. In addition

there were later larger sized bases made for use on series circuits.

These were called the Bernstein, Heisler, Large Edison, Municipal

Bernstein, Municipal Edison, Thomson-Houston (alternating circuit) and

Thomson-Houston (arc circuit). Some of these bases disappeared from

use and in 1900 the proportion in the United States was about 70 per

cent Edison, 15 per cent Westinghouse, 10 per cent Thomson-Houston

and 5 per cent for all the others remaining. A campaign was started

to standardize the Edison base, adapters being sold at cost for the

Westinghouse and Thomson-Houston sockets so that Edison base lamps

could be used. In a few years the desired results were obtained so that

now there are no other sockets in the United States but the Edison

screw type for standard lighting service. This applies also to all

other countries in the world except England where the bayonet form of

base and socket is still popular.

[Illustration:

Bernstein. Heisler. Thomson-Houston

(alternating current).

Thomson-Houston Municipal Edison. Municipal Bernstein.

(arc circuit).

VARIOUS SERIES BASES IN USE, 1892.

The above six bases have been superseded by the “Large Edison,” now

called the Mogul Screw base.]

THE EDISON “MUNICIPAL” STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM

[Illustration: EDISON “MUNICIPAL” SYSTEM, 1885.

High voltage direct current was generated, several circuits operating

in multiple, three ampere lamps burning in series on each circuit.

Photograph courtesy of Association of Edison Illuminating Companies.]

The arc lamp could not practically be made in a unit smaller than

the so-called “1200 candlepower” (6.6 ampere) or “half” size, which

really gave about 350 spherical candlepower. A demand therefore arose

for a small street lighting unit, and Edison designed his “Municipal”

street lighting system to fill this requirement. His experience in the

making of dynamos enabled him to make a direct current bipolar constant

potential machine that would deliver 1000 volts which later was

increased to 1200 volts. They were first made in two sizes having an

output of 12 and 30 amperes respectively. Incandescent lamps were made

for 3 amperes in several sizes from 16 to 50 candlepower. These lamps

were burned in series on the 1200-volt direct current system. Thus the

12-ampere machine had a capacity for four series circuits, each taking

3 amperes, the series circuits being connected in multiple across the

1200 volts. The number of lamps on each series circuit depended upon

their size, as the voltage of each lamp was different for each size,

being about 1½ volts per cp.

A popular size was the 32-candlepower unit, which therefore required

about 45 volts and hence at 3 amperes consumed about 135 watts.

Allowing 5 per cent loss in the wires of each circuit, there was

therefore 1140 of the 1200 volts left for the lamps. Hence about 25

32-candlepower or 50 16-candlepower lamps could be put on each series

circuit. Different sizes of lamps could also be put on the same

circuit, the number depending upon the aggregate voltage of the lamps.

[Illustration: EDISON MUNICIPAL LAMP, 1885.

Inside the base was an arrangement by which the lamp was automatically

short circuited when it burned out.]

A device was put in the base of each lamp to short circuit the lamp

when it burned out so as to prevent all the other lamps on that circuit

from going out. This device consisted of a piece of wire put inside

the lamp bulb between the two ends of the filament. Connected to this

wire was a very thin wire inside the base which held a piece of metal

compressed against a spring. The spring was connected to one terminal

of the base. Should the lamp burn out, current would jump from the

filament to the wire in the bulb, and the current then flowed through

the thin wire to the other terminal of the base. The thin wire was

melted by the current, and the spring pushed the piece of metal up

short circuiting the terminals of the base. This scheme was later

simplified by omitting the wire, spring, etc., and substituting a piece

of metal which was prevented from short circuiting the terminals of

the base by a thin piece of paper. When the lamp burned out the entire

1200 volts was impressed across this piece of paper, puncturing it and

so short circuiting the base terminals. Should one or more lamps go

out on a circuit, the increase in current above the normal 3 amperes

was prevented by an adjustable resistance, or an extra lot of lamps

which could be turned on one at a time, connected to each circuit and

located in the power station under the control of the operator. This

system disappeared from use with the advent of the constant current

transformer.

THE SHUNT BOX SYSTEM FOR SERIES INCANDESCENT LAMPS

[Illustration: SHUNT BOX SYSTEM, 1887.

Lamps were burned in series on a high voltage alternating current, and

when a lamp burned out all the current then went through its “shunt

box,” a reactance coil in multiple with each lamp.]

Soon after the commercial development of the alternating current

constant potential system, a scheme was developed to permit the use

of lamps in series on such circuits without the necessity for short

circuiting a lamp should it burn out. A reactance, called a “shunt box”

and consisting of a coil of wire wound on an iron core, was connected

across each lamp. The shunt box consumed but little current while the

lamp was burning. Should one lamp go out, the entire current would

flow through its shunt box and so maintain the current approximately

constant. It had the difficulty, however, that if several lamps went

out, the current would be materially increased tending to burn out the

remaining lamps on the circuit. This system also disappeared from use

with the development of the constant current transformer.

THE ENCLOSED ARC LAMP

Up to 1893 the carbons of an arc lamp operated in the open air, so

that they were rapidly consumed, lasting from eight to sixteen hours

depending on their length and thickness. Louis B. Marks, an American,

found that by placing a tight fitting globe about the arc, the life

of the carbons was increased ten to twelve times. This was due to the

restricted amount of oxygen of the air in the presence of the hot

carbon tips and thus retarded their consumption. The amount of light

was somewhat decreased, but this was more than offset by the lesser

expense of trimming which also justified the use of more expensive

better quality carbons. Satisfactory operation required that the arc

voltage be increased to about 80 volts.

[Illustration: ENCLOSED ARC LAMP, 1893.

Enclosing the arc lengthened the life of the carbons, thereby greatly

reducing the cost of maintenance.]

This lamp rapidly displaced the series open arc. An enclosed arc lamp

for use on 110-volt constant potential circuits was also developed. A

resistance was put in series with the arc for use on 110-volt direct

current circuits, to act as a ballast in order to prevent the arc from

taking too much current and also to use up the difference between the

arc voltage (80) and the line voltage (110). On alternating current, a

reactance was used in place of the resistance.

The efficiencies in lumens per watt of these arcs (with clear

glassware), all of which have now disappeared from the market, were

about as follows:

6.6 ampere 510 watt direct current (D.C.) series arc, 8¼ l-p-w.

5.0 ampere 550 watt direct current multiple (110-volt) arc, 4½ l-p-w.

7.5 ampere 540 watt alternating current (A.C.) multiple (110-volt)

arc, 4¼ l-p-w.

[Illustration: OPEN FLAME ARC LAMP, 1898.

Certain salts impregnated in the carbons produced a brilliantly

luminous flame in the arc stream which enormously increased the

efficiency of the lamp.]

[Illustration: ENCLOSED FLAME ARC LAMP, 1908.

By condensing the smoke from the arc in a cooling chamber it was

practical to enclose the flame arc, thereby increasing the life of the

carbons.]

The reason for the big difference in efficiency between the series

and multiple direct-current arc is that in the latter a large amount

of electrical energy (watts) is lost in the ballast resistance. While

there is a considerable difference between the inherent efficiencies

of the D. C. and A. C. arcs themselves, this difference is reduced in

the multiple D. C. and A. C. arc lamps as more watts are lost in the

resistance ballast of the multiple D. C. lamp than are lost in the

reactance ballast of the multiple A. C. lamp.

This reactance gives the A. C. lamp what is called a “power-factor.”

The product of the amperes (7.5) times the volts (110) does not give

the true wattage (540) of the lamp, so that the actual volt-amperes

(825) has to be multiplied by a power factor, in this case about 65

per cent, to obtain the actual power (watts) consumed. The reason

is that the instantaneous varying values of the alternating current

and pressure, if multiplied and averaged throughout the complete

alternating cycle, do not equal the average amperes (measured by an

ammeter) multiplied by the average voltage (measured by a volt-meter).

That is, the maximum value of the current flowing (amperes) does not

occur at the same instant that the maximum pressure (voltage) is on the

circuit.

THE FLAME ARC LAMP

About 1844 Bunsen investigated the effect of introducing various

chemicals in the carbon arc. Nothing was done, however, until Bremer,

a German, experimented with various salts impregnated in the carbon

electrodes. In 1898 he produced the so-called flame arc, which

consisted of carbons impregnated with calcium fluoride. This gave a

brilliant yellow light most of which came from the arc flame, and

practically none from the carbon tips. The arc operated in the open air

and produced smoke which condensed into a white powder.

The two carbons were inclined downward at about a 30-degree angle with

each other, and were of small diameter but long, 18 to 30 inches,

having a life of about 12 to 15 hours. The tips of the carbons

projected through an inverted earthenware cup, called the “economizer,”

the white powder condensing on this and acting not only as an excellent

reflector but making a dead air space above the arc. The arc was

maintained at the tips of the carbons by an electro-magnet whose

magnetic field “blew” the arc down.

Two flame arc lamps were burned in series on 110-volt circuits. They

consumed 550 watts each, giving an efficiency of about 35 lumens per

watt on direct current. On alternating current the efficiency was about

30 l-p-w. By use of barium salts impregnated in the carbons, a white

light was obtained, giving an efficiency of about 18 l-p-w on direct

current and about 15½ on alternating current. These figures cover lamps

equipped with clear glassware. Using strontium salts in the carbons,

a red light was obtained at a considerably lower efficiency, such

arcs on account of their color being used only to a limited extent for

advertising purposes.

[Illustration: CONSTANT CURRENT TRANSFORMER, 1900.

This converted alternating current of constant voltage into constant

current, for use on series circuits.]

These arcs were remarkably efficient but their maintenance expense was

high. Later, about 1908, enclosed flame arcs with vertical carbons were

made which increased the life of the carbons, the smoke being condensed

in cooling chambers. However, their maintenance expense was still high.

They have now disappeared from the market, having been displaced by the

very efficient gas-filled tungsten filament incandescent lamp which

appeared in 1913.

THE CONSTANT CURRENT TRANSFORMER FOR SERIES CIRCUITS

About 1900 the constant current transformer was developed by Elihu

Thomson. This transforms current taken from a constant potential

alternating current circuit into a constant alternating current for

series circuits, whose voltage varies with the load on the circuit.

The transformer has two separate coils; the primary being stationary

and connected to the constant potential circuit and the secondary

being movable and connected to the series circuit. The weight of the

secondary coil is slightly underbalanced by a counter weight. Current

flowing in the primary induces current in the secondary, the two coils

repelling each other. The strength of the repelling force depends

upon the amount of current flowing in the two coils. The core of the

transformer is so designed that the central part, which the two coils

surround, is magnetically more powerful close to the primary coil than

it is further away.

When the two coils are close together a higher voltage is induced in

the secondary than if the later were further away from the primary

coil. In starting, the two coils are pulled apart by hand to prevent

too large a current flowing in the series circuit. The secondary

coil is allowed to gradually fall and will come to rest at a point

where the voltage induced in it produces the normal current in the

series circuit, the repelling force between the two coils holding the

secondary at this point. Should the load in the series circuit change

for any reason, the current in the series circuit would also change,

thus changing the force repelling the two coils. The secondary would

therefore move until the current in the series circuit again becomes

normal. The action is therefore automatic, and the actual current

in the series circuit can be adjusted within limits to the desired

amount, by varying the counterweight. A dash pot is used to prevent the

secondary coil from oscillating (pumping) too much.

In the constant current transformer, the series circuit is insulated

from the constant potential circuit. This has many advantages. A

similar device, called an automatic regulating reactance was developed

which is slightly less expensive, but it does not have the advantage of

insulating the two circuits from each other.

ENCLOSED SERIES ALTERNATING CURRENT ARC LAMPS

The simplicity of the constant current transformer soon drove the

constant direct-current dynamo from the market. An enclosed arc lamp

was therefore developed for use on alternating constant current. Two

sizes of lamps were made; one for 6.6 amperes consuming 450 watts

and having an efficiency of about 4½ lumens per watt, and the other

7.5 amperes, 480 watts and 5 l-p-w (clear glassware). These lamps

soon superseded the direct current series arcs. They have now been

superseded by the more efficient magnetite arc and tungsten filament

incandescent lamps.

SERIES INCANDESCENT LAMPS ON CONSTANT CURRENT TRANSFORMERS

Series incandescent lamps were made for use on constant current

transformers superseding the “Municipal” and “Shunt Box” systems. The

large Edison, now called the Mogul Screw base, was adopted and the

short circuiting film cut-out was removed from the base and placed

between prongs attached to the socket.

[Illustration:

Holder. Socket. Holder and socket.

SERIES INCANDESCENT LAMP SOCKET WITH FILM CUTOUT, 1900.

The “Large Edison,” now called Mogul Screw, base was standardized and

the short circuiting device put on the socket terminals.]

The transformers made for the two sizes of arc lamps, produced 6.6

and 7.5 amperes and incandescent lamps, in various sizes from 16 to

50 cp, were made for these currents so that the incandescent lamps

could be operated on the same circuit with the arc lamps. The carbon

series incandescent lamp, however, was more efficient if made for lower

currents, so 3½-, 4- and 5½-ampere constant current transformers were

made for incandescent lamps designed for these amperes. Later, however,

with the advent of the tungsten filament, the 6.6-ampere series

tungsten lamp was made the standard, as it was slightly more efficient

than the lower current lamps, and was made in sizes from 32 to 400 cp.

When the more efficient gas-filled tungsten lamps were developed, the

sizes were further increased; the standard 6.6-ampere lamps now made

are from 60 to 2500 cp.

THE NERNST LAMP

Dr. Walther Nernst, of Germany, investigating the rare earths used in

the Welsbach mantle, developed an electric lamp having a burner, or

“glower” as it was called, consisting of a mixture of these oxides. The

main ingredient was zirconia, and the glower operated in the open air.

It is a non-conductor when cold, so had to be heated before current

would flow through it. This was accomplished by an electric heating

coil, made of platinum wire, located just above the glower. As the

glower became heated and current flowed through it, the heater was

automatically disconnected by an electro-magnet cut-out.

[Illustration: NERNST LAMP, 1900.

The burners consisted mainly of zirconium oxide which had to be heated

before current could go through them.]

The resistance of the glower decreases with increase in current, so a

steadying resistance was put in series with it. This consisted of an

iron wire mounted in a bulb filled with hydrogen gas and was called

a “ballast.” Iron has the property of increasing in resistance with

increase in current flowing through it, this increase being very

marked between certain temperatures at which the ballast was operated.

The lamp was put on the American market in 1900 for use on 220-volt

alternating current circuits. The glower consumed 0.4 ampere. One, two,

three, four and six glower lamps were made, consuming 88, 196, 274, 392

and 528 watts respectively. As most of the light is thrown downward,

their light output was generally given in mean lower hemispherical

candlepower. The multiple glower lamps were more efficient than the

single glower, owing to the heat radiated from one glower to another.

Their efficiencies, depending on the size, were from about 3½ to 5

lumens per watt, and their average candlepower throughout life was

about 80 per cent of initial. The lamp disappeared from the market

about 1912.

[Illustration: DIAGRAM OF NERNST LAMP.]

THE COOPER-HEWITT LAMP

In 1860 Way discovered that if an electric circuit was opened between

mercury contacts a brilliant greenish colored arc was produced.

Mercury was an expensive metal and as the carbon arc seemed to give

the most desirable results, nothing further was done for many years

until Dr. Peter Cooper Hewitt, an American, began experimenting with

it. He finally produced an arc in vacuum in a one-inch glass tube

about 50 inches long for 110 volts direct current circuits, which was

commercialized in 1901. The tube hangs at about 15 degrees from the

horizontal. The lower end contains a small quantity of mercury. The

terminals are at each end of the tube, and the arc was first started

by tilting the tube by hand so that a thin stream of mercury bridged

the two terminals. Current immediately vaporized the mercury, starting

the arc. A resistance is put in series with the arc to maintain the

current constant on direct current constant voltage circuits. Automatic

starting devices were later developed, one of which consisted of an

electro-magnet that tilted the lamp, and the other of an induction coil

giving a high voltage which, in discharging, started the arc.

[Illustration: COOPER-HEWITT MERCURY VAPOR ARC LAMP, 1901.

This gives a very efficient light, practically devoid of red but of

high actinic value, so useful in photography.]

This lamp is particularly useful in photography on account of the

high actinic value of its light. Its light is very diffused and is

practically devoid of red rays, so that red objects appear black in its

light. The lamp consumes 3½ amperes at 110 volts direct current (385

watts) having an efficiency of about 12½ lumens per watt.

History of electric light · 第 4 / 6 段