OUR BOOKING-OFFICE.

(_By Mr. Punch's Staff of Learned Clerks._)

Inevitably you will find a sad significance in the title of _Harvest_

(COLLINS), the last story, I suppose, that we shall have from the pen of

Mrs. HUMPHREY WARD. It is a quite simple tale, very simply told, and of

worth less for its inherent drama than for the admirable picture it gives

of rural England in the last greatest days of the Great War. How quick was

the writer's sympathy with every phase of the national ordeal is proved

again by a score of vivid passages in which the fortunes of her characters

are dated by the tremendous events that form their background. The story

itself is of two women in partnership on a Midland farm, one of whom, the

senior, has in her past certain secret episodes which, as is the way of

such things, return to find her out and bring her happiness to ruin. The

character of this _Janet_ is well and vigorously drawn, though there is

perhaps little in her personality as shown here to make understandable the

passion of her past. All the details of life on the land in the autumn of

1918 are given with a skill that brings into the book not only the scent of

the wheat-field but the stress, emotional and economic, of those

unforgettable months. Because it is all so typically English one may call

it a true consummation of the work of one who loved England well. In Mrs.

WARD'S death the world of letters mourns the loss of a writer whose talent

was ever ungrudgingly at the service of her country. She leaves a gap that

it will be hard to fill.

* * * * *

In some ways I think that they will be fortunate who do not read _A Remedy

Against Sin_ (HUTCHINSON) till the vicissitudes of book-life have deprived

it of its pictorial wrapper, because, though highly attractive as a

drawing, the very charmingly-clad minx of the illustration is hardly a

figure to increase one's sympathy with her as an injured heroine. And of

course it is precisely this sympathy that Mr. W. B. MAXWELL is playing

for--first, last and all the time. His title and the puff's preliminary

will doubtless have given you the aim of the story, "to influence the

public mind on one of the most vital questions of the day," the injustice

of our divorce laws. For this end Mr. MAXWELL has exercised all his ability

on the picture of a foolish young wife, chained to a lout who is shown

passing swiftly from worse to unbearable, and herself broken at last by the

ordeal of the witness-box in a "defended action." Inevitably such a book, a

record of disillusion and increasing misery, can hardly be cheerful; tales

with a purpose seldom are. But the poignant humanity of it will hold your

sympathy throughout. You may think that Mr. MAXWELL too obviously loads his

dice, and be aware also that (like others of its kind) the story suffers

from over-concentration on a single theme. It moves in a world of

incompatibles. The heroine's kindly friend is tied to a dipsomaniac wife;

her coachman has no remedy for a ruined home because of the expense of

divorce, and so on. To a great extent, however, Mr. MAXWELL'S craft has

enabled him to overcome even these obstacles; his characters, though you

may suspect manipulation, remain true types of their rather tiresome kind,

and the result is a book that, though depressing, refuses to be put down.

But as a wedding-present--no!

* * * * *

_The Underworld_ (JENKINS) describes life round about and down below a

small coal-mine in Scotland something near thirty years ago. Its author,

JAMES WELSH, tells us in a simple manly preface that he became a miner at

the age of twelve, and worked at every phase of coal-getting till lately he

was appointed check-weigher by his fellows, and therefore writes of what he

knows at first hand. Here then is a straightforward tale with for hero a

sensitive and enthusiastic young miner who draws his inspiration from BOB

SMILLIE, loses his girl to the coal-owner's son and his life in a

rescue-party. The villain, double-dyed, is not the coal-owner but his

"gaffer," who favours his men as to choice of position at the coal-face in

return for favours received from their wives. The chief surprise to the

reader will be the difference between the status and power of the miner

then and now. The writer has a considerable skill in composing effective

dialogue, especially between his men; gives a convincing picture of the pit

and home life, the anxieties, courage, affections and aspirations of the

friends of whom he is "so proud." Nor does he cover up their weaknesses.

Purple passages of fine writing show his inexperience slipping into

pitfalls by the way, but his work rings true and deserves to be read by

many at the present time when miners are so far from being victims of "the

block"--the employers' device for starving out a "difficult" man--that they

look like fitting the boot to another leg. One is made to realise their

anxiety to get rid of that boot.

* * * * *

_How They Did It_ (METHUEN) may be regarded as a novel with a purpose, and,

like most such, suffers from the defects of its good intentions. The object

is "an exposure of war muddling at home," and it must be admitted that Mr.

GERALD O'DONOVAN gives us no half-measure; indeed I was left with the idea

that greater moderation would have made a better case. To illustrate it, he

takes his hero, _David Grant_, through a variety of experiences.

Incapacitated from active fighting through the loss of an arm, he is given

work as a housing officer on the Home Front. His endeavours to check the

alleged extravagance and corruption of this command led to his being

"invalided out"; after which he wanders round seeking civilian war-work

(and marking only dishonesty everywhere), and ends up with a post in the

huge, newly-formed and almost entirely farcical Ministry of Business. This

final epithet puts in one word my criticism of Mr. O'DONOVAN'S method.

Everyone admits the large grain of truth in his charges; the trouble is

that he has too often allowed an honest indignation to carry him past his

mark into the regions of burlesque, and in particular to confuse character

with caricature. But as a topical squib, briskly written, _How They Did It_

will provide plenty of angry amusement, with enough suggestion of the

_roman a clef_ to keep the curious happy in fitting originals to its many

portraits. I should perhaps add that the plot, such as it is, is held

together by a rather perfunctory and intermittent love-affair, too

obviously employed only to fill up time while the author is thinking out

some fresh exposure. This I regretted, as _Mary_, the heroine, is here a

shadow of what seems attractive and original substance. I wonder that the

author did not invent for her a Ministry of Romance. He is quite capable of

it.

* * * * *

Among the writers who have established stable reputations for themselves

during the War "KLAXON" is in the very front rank. This is partly due to an

easy natural style, but most to a sound judgment and an amazingly clear eye

for essentials. To those (not myself) who want to forget the last few years

it may seem that we have already been given enough opportunities to read

about our submarines. Well, I have read nearly everything that has been

written on this subject and could yet draw great delight from _The Story of

Our Submarines_ (BLACKWOOD), a most informing and fascinating book.

"Whatever happens," says "KLAXON," "the German policy of torpedoing

merchant ships without warning must be made not only illegal but unsafe for

a nation adopting it.... If these notes of mine serve no other purpose,

they will, at any rate, do something towards differentiating between the

submarine and the U-boat." By which it will be seen that to his many other

claims on our regard "KLAXON" adds the gift, not always found among

experts, of modesty.

* * * * *

[Illustration: DISGUST OF AN ARTIST ON FINDING HIS ACADEMY SUCCESS OF 1899

AT AN AUCTION OF MISCELLANEOUS ARTICLES LEFT BEHIND IN RAILWAY CARRIAGES.]

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 158, April 14, 1920 · 第 39 / 41 题