CHAPTER X

THE BEGINNINGS OF ELECTRO-CHEMISTRY

The first year of the nineteenth century is further memorable on

account of the invention of the voltaic pile, and by reason of its

application by =William Nicholson= and =Sir Anthony Carlisle= to the

electrolytic decomposition of water. This mode of resolving water into

its constituents made a great sensation at the time, mainly because

of the extraordinary method by which it was effected. It afforded an

independent and unlooked-for proof of the compound nature of water

by a method altogether differing in principle from that by which its

composition had been previously ascertained. The formation of water by

the combustion of hydrogen brought no conviction of its real nature

to a confirmed phlogistian like Priestley; and it is even doubtful

whether Cavendish ever fully realised the true significance of his

great discovery. But the fact that the quantitative results of the

analysis thus effected were identical with those of its synthesis, as

made by Cavendish and Lavoisier, admitted of only one interpretation.

This cardinal discovery may be said to have completed the downfall of

phlogiston.

The value of the voltaic pile as an analytical agent was nowhere more

quickly appreciated than in England. In the hands of Humphry Davy its

application to the analysis of the alkalis and alkaline earths led to

discoveries of the greatest magnitude.

=Humphry Davy= was born in Penzance in 1778. In the course of his

studies for the profession of medicine he was attracted to chemistry;

and he became chemical assistant to Dr. Beddoes, a former teacher of

chemistry at Oxford, but then living at Clifton, near Bristol. While

in the capacity of assistant and operator in Beddoes’s Pneumatical

Institute, Davy discovered the intoxicating properties of _nitrous

oxide_ (so called laughing gas), which brought him into prominence

and led to his engagement by the managers of the newly-created Royal

Institution in London as lecturer in chemistry in succession to

Garnett. He early began to experiment on galvanism, and soon succeeded

in developing the fundamental laws of electro-chemistry; and in 1807 he

effected the _decomposition of potash and soda_ by the application of

voltaic electricity—thereby establishing, what indeed had been surmised

previously, that the alkalis are compound substances. He subsequently

proved that this was also the case with the alkaline earths. Davy thus

added some five or six metallic elements to those already known.

These discoveries, perhaps the most brilliant of their time, afforded

additional evidence of the invalidity of Lavoisier’s assumption that

oxygen, as the name implies, was the “principle of acidity.” The

surmise, in fact, was already disproved by the case of water—a neutral

substance and devoid of all the recognised attributes of an acid. It

was still further disproved by the cases of potash and soda—strongly

alkaline compounds.

Additional evidence was adduced by Davy in demonstrating, in 1810,

that the so-called _oxymuriatic acid_, the _dephlogisticated

marine acid_ discovered by Scheele, contained no oxygen, but was

a simple, indivisible substance. For the old designation, which

connoted a compound body, he substituted the name _chlorine_, in

allusion to the characteristic colour of the element. In the course

of his investigation on this substance he discovered the _penta-

and trichloride of phosphorus_, _chlorophosphamide_ and _chlorine

peroxide_. He was also the discoverer of _telluretted hydrogen_ and an

independent discoverer of _nitrosulphonic acid_.

[Illustration: SIR HUMPHRY DAVY.

From a painting by Lawrence in the possession of the Royal Society.]

He worked on _iodine_ and the _iodates_, on the _diamond_, on the

so-called _fuming liquor of Cadet_, on _nitrogen chloride_, and on the

_pigments of the ancients_. Lastly, he invented the _miner’s safety

lamp_, with which his name will always be associated, effecting thereby

what was practically a revolution in coal-mining. He became President

of the Royal Society in 1820, and died at Geneva on May 29th, 1829, in

the fifty-first year of his age. Davy was a singularly gifted man, of

great mental vigour and imaginative power; quick, lively and ingenious;

an eloquent teacher and a daring and brilliant experimenter.

Another noteworthy name in the chemical history of this period is

Wollaston. =William Hyde Wollaston=, born at East Dereham, in Norfolk,

in 1766, was educated at Cambridge with a view to the profession of

medicine, but, failing to secure a practice, he devoted himself to

the pursuit of science, and especially to optics and chemistry. He

devised a method of _working platinum_, and was the first to make known

the existence of _palladium_ and _rhodium_. He was one of the most

ingenious and acute analysts of his time, and possessed remarkable

inventive powers. He investigated the nature of _urinary calculi_

and _chalk stones_. His paper on the _oxalates of potash_ was of

great service at the time as a demonstration of the law of multiple

proportions. He first drew attention to the existence in the solar

spectrum of what were subsequently termed the _Fraunhofer lines_; and

he invented the _reflecting goniometer_ and the _camera lucida_, and

a _slide rule_ for chemical calculations. He resembled Cavendish in

temperament and mental habitudes, and, like him, was distinguished

for the range and exactitude of his scientific knowledge, his habitual

caution, and his cold and reserved disposition. He died in 1828.

[Illustration: WILLIAM HYDE WOLLASTON.

From a painting by J. Jackson, R.A., in the possession of the Royal

Society.]

Almost immediately after the publication of Volta’s discovery attempts

were made—notably by Berzelius in Sweden and by Davy in England—to

prove that electrical and chemical phenomena are correlated and

mutually dependent. This assumption was more fully worked out by

Berzelius in 1812, and it served as the basis of a chemical system

which exercised considerable influence on chemical doctrine during the

first half of the nineteenth century.

Berzelius assumed that electric polarity was an attribute of all

atoms—that these were bipolar, in fact, but that in them either

positive or negative electricity predominated. Hence the elements

were capable of being divided into two classes—that is, positive or

negative, depending upon the excess of either charge. Which of the

electricities predominated might be ascertained by determining the

particular pole at which the element was separated on electrolysis.

Combinations of dissimilar elements—or, in other words, chemical

compounds—were also endowed with polarity. The chemical affinities of

elements and compounds were related to the excess of either kind of

electricity resident in them; and chemical combination resulted from,

and was a consequence of, the more or less perfect neutralisation

of the two kinds. From a study of the electrical deportment of the

elements Berzelius sought to arrange them in series, starting with

oxygen as the most electro-negative member.

These conceptions were employed by him as the basis of a method of

classification. The attempt is historically interesting as being the

first systematic endeavour to gain an insight into the constitution

of chemical compounds—that is, to determine the manner in which the

constituent atoms are grouped or arranged with respect to one another,

or, in other words, to distinguish between the empirical and the

rational composition of substances, which is the ultimate aim of modern

chemistry.

A necessary consequence of these views was that every compound was to

be considered as made up of two parts in electrically different states.

Thus baryta, consisted of a combination of the electro-positive barium,

combined with the electro-negative oxygen; it combined with sulphuric

oxide because the preponderating positive electricity it contained met

with the negative electricity which prevailed in the sulphuric oxide.

Generalising, it may be said that the basic oxides are invariably

the positive constituents of salts, whereas the acid oxides are the

negative constituents, as proved by the mode in which the two kinds of

oxides separated at the poles on electrolysis. Barium sulphate, then,

was to be regarded as made up of two entities—BaO and SO3—and hence was

to be called sulphate of baryta. Berzelius extended this conception

in order to explain the formation of double salts—such, for example,

as potash alum, which he regarded as a binary compound of positive

potassium sulphate and negative aluminium sulphate, each of which,

in its turn, could be resolved into an acidic and a basic oxide of

opposite electricities.

The dualistic notions of Berzelius led him to the construction of

a system of chemical nomenclature and notation which, in its main

features, has persisted to this day, and is universally current, with

certain modifications, in modern chemical literature. We owe to him

the grouping of the elements into metals and metalloids, and also our

present system of symbolic notation, whereby even complicated chemical

reactions may be expressed in a concise and intelligible manner.

Chemical symbols were used by the alchemists; but Berzelius first

suggested that a chemical symbol should not only represent the element

to which it refers, but also its relative atomic weight. Chemical

equations became quantitative as well as qualitative expressions of

the facts they denote. Such equations implicitly assumed that, to

use Davy’s words, chemistry had passed under the dominion of the

mathematical sciences. Professed mathematicians were, however, slow to

recognise that the phenomena of chemical action were capable of formal

mathematical treatment. Davy relates that on speaking to Laplace of

the atomic theory in chemistry, and expressing his belief that the

science would ultimately be referred to mathematical laws similar to

those he had so profoundly and successfully established with respect

to the mechanical properties of matter, the idea was treated in a tone

bordering on contempt.

Berzelius’s electro-chemical system, and the dualistic ideas associated

with it, were of considerable service when applied to the inorganic

branch of the science; but attempts to fit them to the facts of organic

chemistry, which began to accumulate rapidly after the first quarter of

the century, failed. Its inadequacy as a comprehensive generalisation

became more and more manifest, and it eventually fell. In fact, it may

be said to have received its death-blow by Davy’s discovery of the

elementary nature of chlorine, and by the recognition of the fact that

the acids do not necessarily contain oxygen. Davy and, later, Dulong

made it obvious that, if any one element was to be regarded as the

acidifying principle, it was hydrogen, and not oxygen; and, in a sense,

this view ultimately prevailed in the recognition of the acids as salts

of hydrogen.

In France the study of electro-chemistry was undertaken by Gay Lussac

and Thénard, largely owing to the action of the Emperor Napoleon,

who furnished the funds for the construction of a powerful galvanic

battery. The results were published, in 1811, under the title,

_Recherches Physico-Chimiques, faites sur la Pile_, etc. Gay Lussac,

whose name has already been mentioned as one of the discoverers of

the Law of Combination of Gases, played a considerable part in the

history of chemistry at this period. He was one of the earliest to

appreciate the importance of Dalton’s generalisation, and to point

out the significance of his own discovery in strengthening it. He was

probably led, in the first instance, to the recognition of the law of

gaseous combination by Berthollet’s work on the volumetric composition

of ammonia gas, and by his own discovery—made in 1805, in conjunction

with Humboldt, in the course of their analysis of atmospheric air—that

one volume of oxygen combined with exactly two volumes of hydrogen to

form water. The regularities thus indicated he found to be general: all

gases which are capable of chemical union combine in simple proportions

by volume, and the volume of the product, if a gas, always stands in

some simple relation to the volumes of the constituents.

=Joseph Louis Gay Lussac= was born in 1778, at Saint Leonard, studied

chemistry in Paris, and was associated in chemical inquiry with

Berthollet. As Eleve-Ingenieur in the École Nationale des Ponts et

des Chaussées he began the experimental work in physics and chemistry

upon which his fame rests. In 1804 he undertook, with Biot, a series

of balloon ascents for the purpose of investigating the physics and

chemistry of the upper regions of the atmosphere. In 1806 he became

Professor of Chemistry at the École Polytechnique, and in 1832

Professor at the Jardin des Plantes. He was one of the chief assayers

of the French Mint, and, as member of many commissions, exerted

considerable influence in official circles. He died in 1850.

Gay Lussac and Thénard were the first to devise a method of obtaining

potassium and sodium by a purely chemical process, whereby these

metals could be procured in far larger quantities than was at that

time possible by electrolytic means. They were thus enabled to make

use of the strong deoxidising power of these metals to effect a number

of reductions, notably that of boric oxide to _boron_. Gay Lussac and

Thénard were also the first to make known the existence of _boron

fluoride_. We further owe to Gay Lussac the discovery of _cyanogen_,

the first of the so-called compound radicals. He first prepared

ethyl iodide, investigated sulphovinic acid and grape sugar, studied

etherification and fermentation, etc. We are also indebted to him

for a method of determining vapour densities which proved of great

service in ascertaining the molecular weights of substances. He worked

on iodine and its compounds, discovered, with Welter, _thiosulphuric_

acid, and investigated fulminic acid in collaboration with Liebig.

Among his services to analytical chemistry were his method for the

analysis of gunpowder, his volumetric estimation of silver (wet silver

assay), chlorometric analysis, alkalimetry, etc. He devised the system

still in use in France for the estimation of alcohol in spirits of wine.

=Louis Jacques Thénard= was born in 1777 at Nogent-Sur-Seine, and was

a pupil of Vauquelin and of Berthollet. In 1797 he became _repétiteur_

at the Polytechnic School of Paris, and eventually its professor. He

subsequently occupied the chair of chemistry at the Collège de France,

and of the Faculty of Science of the University of Paris. He was

ennobled by Charles X. in 1824, and died at Paris in the eightieth year

of his age.

In addition to his work with Gay Lussac already mentioned, we owe

to Thénard the discovery of _hydrogen peroxide_ and _hydrogen

persulphide_. Together with Dulong he studied the catalytic action of

platinum on mixtures of oxygen and hydrogen. He investigated the fatty

acids, and worked on fermentation and on ether-formation; and he was

the first to isolate citric and malic acids. He also occupied himself

with the chemistry of bile, perspiration, albumen, the acids of urine

and milk, and with the theory of mordants.

In 1834 Faraday made known the important fact that on passing the same

galvanic current through a number of electrolytes—water, hydrochloric

acid, solutions of metallic chloride—these were decomposed in such

manner that definite amounts of hydrogen or metal were separated at the

negative pole, and corresponding amounts of oxygen or chlorine were

evolved at the positive pole. These observations were comprehended

by Faraday under his “law of definite electrolytic action.” The

electro-chemical equivalents thus obtained were in some cases identical

with the atomic weights deduced by Berzelius; in others they were

not; but, nevertheless, when they differed, they stood in some simple

relation to the assumed atomic weight. The significance of Faraday’s

observation was not lost sight of, although his anticipation that the

determination of electro-chemical equivalents would be of use in fixing

atomic weights was not immediately appreciated. A clear distinction

between the _equivalent_, the _atom_, and the _molecule_ was not

then apprehended. As will be subsequently shown, it was only during

the latter half of the nineteenth century that the discrepancies and

inconsistencies thus revealed were definitely reconciled and cleared

up.

History of Chemistry, Volume 1 (of 2) From the earliest time to the middle of the nineteenth century · 第 10 / 12 章