OUR BOOKING-OFFICE.

The Walery-Gallery Co.--for WALERY has transformed himself into a

Limited Liability--is bringing out a series of "Sporting Celebrities,"

with sporting notes, monographs, and dramatic notes too. The photographs

are excellent. Two in each monthly number. The monographs are right

enough, but the sporting and dramatic notes in a monthly, are either not

sufficient or too much. Three portraits and three monographs, one

sportswoman and two sportsmen in each number would be better, at least,

so it seems to the learned Baron, who would sum up the requisites for

making the Walery-Gallery Sporting Series a success in a Shakspearian

quotation, adapted for this special occasion,--"More art and less

matter."

The Baron is always much interested in the _Revue de Famille_, directed

and largely contributed to by M. JULES SIMON, who is also a pretty

regular contributor to its pages. In December last, M. SIMON wrote a

thoughtful and interesting article on _L'Education des Femmes_, and M.

FRANCISQUE SARCEY, a very amusing paper on _Le Timide au Théâtre_. The

number for February (it is only a bi-monthly publication) has a paper on

_L'Influence_ (not the influenza) _des Femmes en France_, the only fault

of which is its length; and GYP gives a satirical sketch called _Nos

Docteurs_, which hardly seems in keeping with the family character of

the _Revue_. The March Number is now out, and can be procured at

HACHETTE'S. It is one of the best French serials.

A delightful book is _Yorkshire Legends and Traditions_, collected and

recounted by the Rev. THOMAS PARKINSON. He who writes of fairies and of

witches should of course possess some potent spell--(how many members of

the School-Board, had they lived a couple of hundred years ago, would

have been punished as witches for teaching "spelling," it is pleasant to

imagine)--and Mr. PARKINSON'S great charm is his apparent belief in the

wonders he relates. Even when he occasionally alludes to "popular

superstition," you feel it is only a phrase introduced evidently out of

consideration for the unphilosophic prejudices of his "so-called"

Nineteenth-Century readers, who pride themselves on being HUXLEYS in the

full blaze of scientific light, and yet would shrink from passing a

night in a haunted room, or, if alone, would go a mile out of their way

to avoid an uncanny spot. The greatest mistake made by narrators of the

marvellous is attempting to account for the unaccountable. This book is,

I believe, one of a series now being published by ELLIOT STOCK, of

Paternoster Row, a stock which Your Own Baron recommends as a safe

investment, for the book alone is a good dividend, the interest being

kept up all through; and it is satisfactory to hear that, as the other

counties of England, and perhaps of Ireland and Scotland, are being

dealt with in a similar manner, there is a good reserve-fund of

information and amusement.

Mr. RUNCIMAN, in _The Fortnightly_, brings a serious indictment of

plagiarism against Mr. RIDER HAGGARD, which it strikes me he would be

unable to sustain in a Court of Common Sense before MR. PRESIDENT PUNCH,

unless it were first laid down as a fixed principle, that a writer of

fiction must never have recourse to any narrative of facts whereon to

base his Romance.

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 98, March 15, 1890 · 第 14 / 24 题