CHAPTER IX.

FOR all this ¹I considered │ FOR with respect to all this,

in my heart even to declare │ I have laid to my heart that

all this, that the righteous, │ which is to be deduced from it

and the wise, and their works, │ all, which is, that right and

_are_ in the hand of God: no │ wisdom, and any service they

man knoweth either love or │ can render, are in the hand of

hatred _by_ all _that is_ │ the Almighty, and whether [an

before them. │ event be an indication of His]

│ love or displeasure either, no

¹ _Hebrew_ I gave _or_ set │ man knows from anything he sees

to my heart. │ before him,

IX. (1.) =For with respect to all this, I have given it to= (אל, not

‎‏את, which the LXX. render by εἰς) =my heart, and to sift out= (occurs

here only, but compare chapter iii. 18) =with respect to all this= (but

the LXX., dividing the words differently, evidently read ולבי ראת כל זה,

which would mean, ‘when that heart was seeing all this.’ The number

of various readings――see Stier and Theile, _Polyglot_――show that

this passage was early one of difficulty. The rendering of Symmachus,

preserved by Jerome, ‘omnia ita statui [fort. ἔταξα] in corde meo ut

ventilarem universa,’ conveys the meaning; which is, that Koheleth

set to his heart that which is the result when the matter is entirely

sifted) =which is the righteous and the wise= (generic and plural, all

those things which are right or wise generally; ‘right and wisdom,’ as

we speak, is the meaning) =and their works= (_i.e._ what they produce,

or, better still, their ‘services’) are =in the hand of the Deity,

also love= (in the abstract), =also hatred= (also abstract, and גם

being repeated gives the idea of both love and hatred too) =is nothing,

knowing the man= (the negative belongs to the noun, not to the verb,

and so the meaning must be ‘there is _no man_ who does know.’ Moreover,

the two nominatives absolute, ‘love’ and ‘hatred,’ are the subjects of

the whole sentence, ‘as to love or hatred either, there is no man who

knows,’ or, better still, ‘to whom is made known,’ giving the import

to the participle) =the whole= (generic) =before them= (distributive

plural, any of them, equivalent then ‘to anything which is before

them’).

2 All _things come_ alike │ evanescence being that which

to all: _there is_ one event │ belongs to all. That which

to the righteous, and to the │ happens is just the same to

wicked; to the good, and to │ the right and to the wrong, to

the clean, and to the unclean; │ good [_and to bad_, LXX.], and

to him that sacrificeth, and │ to clean and to unclean, and

to him that sacrificeth not: │ to the sacrificer as to one

as _is_ the good, so _is_ │ who never sacrifices; as the

the sinner; _and_ he that │ good, so the erring sinner,

sweareth, as _he_ that feareth │ the forsworn as though he had

an oath. │ feared the oath.

(2.) =The whole= (but all the ancient versions read here הבל,

‘_vanity_,’ and this makes better sense; the error, for such we believe

it to be, in the Masoretic text, was one so likely to occur, that,

considering the strong weight of testimony in favour of the LXX., and

the far better sense it makes with the context, we may well adopt it.

As an additional reason for following the LXX., we notice that the

Syriac reads (‡ Syriac phrase) ‘all that is before him is vanity, all

just as that which is to all,’ combining, therefore, both readings

together. Thus it appears that the variation in the texts was a very

ancient one. If this reading be adopted, then combining it with the

words which follow) =as= (or like this same) =to all= (the meaning

will be ‘transitoriness is exactly the same to all,’ or ‘all alike

are equally transitory.’ If, however, we retain the Masoretic text

and pointing, a good sense is made. ‘_The whole_ is as it were to

all,’ namely) =a happening= which is =one to the righteous, and to

the impious, to the good= (the LXX. add here _to the bad_), =to the

clean, and to the unclean, to the sacrificer, and to one who has not

sacrificed; as is the good so the sinner= (but general, including

things as well as persons), =the forsworn as one who an oath fears.=

3 This _is_ an evil among │ This evil is in all which is

all _things_ that are done │ performed in this work-day

under the sun, that _there is_ │ world: that there is but one

one event unto all: yea, also │ event to all, and so the heart

the heart of the sons of men │ of the human race overflows

is full of evil, and madness │ with wrong, and foolish

_is_ in their heart while they │ anticipations are in their

live, and after that _they go_ │ inmost hearts while they live,

to the dead. │ and what succeeds――it belongs

│ to the _dead_.

(3.) =This wrong= is _in all which is done_ (niphal, and therefore

objective; men both do and suffer as though this were so) = under the

sun, how a happening= which is =one= (_i.e._ the same) =to all= (the

force of this reasoning is made apparent by what follows, as there

is no visible reward to these righteous persons as compared with the

wicked, wicked men presume); =and moreover, the heart of the sons of

Adam is full of= (‘overflows with’ would represent the idea) =evil,

and false expectations= (הוללות occurs chapter i. 17――see references;

the meaning deduced exactly suits this passage; it is the false hope

begotten of an evil action, a crime worse than a blunder, to invert a

celebrated aphorism) =in their hearts= (לבב is ‘the inmost heart’――see

Concordance, _sub voce_, for the shade of difference between לב and

‎‏לבב), =in their lives, and their future= (_i.e._ what comes afterwards)

=belongs to= (the preposition is אל, which the LXX. note, and render by

πρὸς) =the dead= (generic, with the article).

4 ¶ For to him that is │ For whoever he may be,

joined to all the living there │ he chooses altogether as

is hope: for a living dog is │ regarding the _living_, this

better than a dead lion. │ being his anticipation: for to

│ a dog alive it is indeed better

│ than the lion when he is dead.

(4.) =For whoever= (interrogative pronoun followed by אשר, compare

Exodus xxxii. 33; it has here the sense, ‘For whoever he be’) =chooses=

(the Kri reads ‘is joined to,’ which the LXX., Syriac, Targum, and

Symmachus all have; but this and the pointing as a pual is merely a

Masoretic conjecture: it would be better with the LXX. to take it in

an active sense, κοινωνεῖ, ‘participates.’ The Chetib is perfectly

intelligible, however, and is to be preferred) =towards= (אל, as in

verse 3) =all= (but כל is without the article; hence it has the meaning,

the ‘whole of’) =the lives= (with the article, and hence generic,

‘lives generally.’ Thus the meaning is, ‘For whoever he be, he is one

who chooses entirely with relation to the living’), =it is= (יש, it

exists as such) =an expectation= (בטחון, occurs 2 Kings xviii. 19, and

its parallel Isaiah xxxvi. 4 besides this place only, in the meaning

of a ‘confidence’ or ‘expectation,’ and this meaning gives excellent

sense here: ‘is his expectation that he will _live:_’ no man makes

plans on the supposition that he is going to _die_; he may indeed

provide for others after he is dead, but the horizon of his own hopes

is necessarily bounded by his life). =For= (an additional reason

confirming the above) =to a dog alive it is= (emphatic) =good above the

lion= (with the article, because this is generic; it is not _a_ lion,

but lion qualities generally), =the dead= (again generic, for the same

reason――‘a live dog is better than the lion when he is dead,’ is the

exact turn of thought).

5 For the living know that │ Yet the living are quite aware

they shall die: but the dead │ that they shall die; but the

know not any thing, neither │ dead are not aware of anything;

have they any more a reward; │ and they can have no further

for the memory of them is │ recompense, because a forgotten

forgotten. │ thing is their memorial:

(5.) =For the living= ones =are knowing that they will die= (this is an

additional reason to the above, and so may be rendered, ‘but the living

are certain that they will _die_‘), =but the dead= (plural, with the

article, ‘the dead persons generally’) =are not those who are knowing

anything= (it is not here, be it observed, the existence of knowledge

on the part of the dead which is denied, but that, from the author’s

point of view, the dead are persons who do not know anything: an

unevangelic sense has been given to this passage by not attending to

this distinction), =and there is nothing further to them= (emphatic)

which is a =hire= (or a reward in this life accruing to them as a

recompense for their toil), =because forgotten= (niphal in its usual

objective sense) is =their remembrance.=

6 Also their love, and their │ and then their love and their

hatred, and their envy, is now │ hatred also, and their envy as

perished; neither have they │ well, as far as this Present

any more a portion for ever in │ is concerned, are perished;

any _thing_ that is done under │ and there is no further

the sun. │ participation for them in the

│ age, in anything that may be

│ done within this work-day world.

(6.) =Moreover their love, moreover their hatred, moreover their

envy= (the triple repetition of גם brings this word into prominence,

equivalent to ‘their love also; yes, their hatred and envy too’) =in

this present= (כבר, see chapter i. 10, references; the word occurs

again in its technical sense of the ‘present state of things,’ and

makes excellent sense here), =perish= (abstract ‘is a thing perished’)

=in all which= (full relative) =is done under the sun.= On this follows

the most touching piece of sarcasm in the whole work. There is a force

and pungency about it which is very striking.

7 ¶ Go thy way, eat thy │ Go then, eat thy bread with

bread with joy, and drink thy │ gladness, and drink in good

wine with a merry heart; for │ heart thy wine, if in the

God now accepteth thy works. │ present the Almighty prospers

│ thy works.

(7.) =Go, eat= (_i.e._ enjoy) in =pleasure thy bread, and drink in

heart= of =good thy wine; for so in the present hath prospered the

Deity thy workings.=

8 Let thy garments be always │ At every opportunity let thy

white; and let thy head lack │ garments be white, and the oil

no ointment. │ to thy head do not spare.

(8.) =In all season= (עת, a providential season――see chapter iii. 1, 19)

=let them be= (even) =thy garments white= (it is hardly possible here,

when we remember the constant use in Scripture of _white_ garments, not

to discover one of those hidden allusions with which this book abounds

to a pure as alone a happy life; the garments of the sensualist and

drunkard are, in the emphatic language of the apostle, ‘spotted with

_the flesh_’), =and oil= (see chapter vii. 1, as the symbol of luxury

and wealth) =on thy head do not spare= (chapter iv. 8; ‘do not stint’

or ‘save it as for another time,’ is the meaning: ‘use it when you have

the occasion’).

9 ¹Live joyfully with the │ Enjoy life with that woman

wife whom thou lovest all the │ whom thou lovest, all the days

days of the life of thy vanity,│ of thy evanescent life, which

which he hath given thee under │ He grants thee in this hot

the sun, all the days of thy │ work-day world,――all these

vanity: for that _is_ thy │ evanescent days, I say, for

portion in _this_ life, and in │ _that_ is all thou canst

thy labour which thou takest │ possess in thy life, and from

under the sun. │ that toil thyself art toiling

│ ever in this same work-day

¹ _Hebrew_ See _or_ enjoy │ world.

life. │

(9.) =See lives together with the woman which thou lovest= (it is to

be remarked here that Koheleth speaks of a woman in the singular; the

idea thus implied is cognate with that of the white garments, it is

pure domestic love) =all the days of the lives of thy vanity= (_i.e._

thy evanescent life) =which= He =gives to thee= (the nominative is no

doubt the Deity; but as this nominative is so far off, the verb becomes

almost an impersonal) =under the sun all the days of thy vanity=

(repeated); =for that same is thy portion in lives in thy toil which

thou= (emphatic) =toilest at under the sun= (repeated, and therefore

having the meaning, ‘under that same sun,’ the whole being thus

strictly limited to the horizon of this world).

10 Whatsoever thy hand │ All that thy hand finds to do,

findeth to do, do _it_ with │ to the utmost do it, because

thy might; for _there is_ │ there is no work, nor device,

no work, nor device, nor │ nor wisdom, nor knowledge in

knowledge, nor wisdom, in the │ the grave, and that is whither

grave, whither thou goest. │ thou art hastening.

(10.) =All which shall find thy hand in order to do= (that is,

everything which it is in thy power to perform in regard of the above),

=in thy might do it, because= there is =nothing= of =a work, or a

contrivance, or a knowledge, or a wisdom= (all these being without the

article, and singular) =in Sheol, which= (is the ‘place,’ or ‘end,’

etc.; for we have in English to supply some general word here) =thou=

(emphatic) =art going unto= (the meaning is, ‘and _that_ is whither

_thou_ art going unto’).

11 ¶ I returned, and saw │ But to return, I perceived

under the sun, that the race │ how in this work-day world that

_is_ not to the swift, nor the │ not to the swift ones is the

battle to the strong, neither │ race, nor to the strong ones

yet bread to the wise, nor yet │ the battle, nor even to wise

riches to men of understanding,│ ones bread, nor yet to prudent

nor yet favour to men of skill;│ ones wealth, nor yet to the

but time and chance happeneth │ instructed ones favour. For

to them all. │ time and chance happens with

│ regard to them all.

(11.) =I turned=, and =see under the sun= (‘see’ is rightly joined by

the accents to the word which follows it; it is, as this formula of

introduction shows, another aspect of the same truth as that set forth

above) =how not to swift= is =the race= (מרוץ, occurs here only), =and

not= to =mighty ones the war, and also not to wise ones bread, and also

not to prudent ones= (occurs Genesis xli. 33 of Joseph, and 1 Kings

iii. 12 of Solomon) =an increase, and not to knowing ones a favour=:

(these three nouns, ‘bread,’ etc., are singular and without the article,

the other two are with it), =for time= (the providential season, that

is) and =chance= (occurs 1 Kings v. 4 as a noun only; the meaning

of the verb, which occurs frequently, is, ‘to meet,’ ‘to approach’)

=happens with respect to= (את, which the LXX. notice by making the verb

compound, συναντήσεται) =all.=

12 For man also knoweth not │ For so also Humanity knows not

his time: as the fishes that │ its time, but just like fishes

are taken in an evil net, and │ which have been caught in a

as the birds that are caught │ net, or birds held fast in a

in the snare; so _are_ the │ snare, just like them the sons

sons of men snared in an evil │ of men are ensnared in some

time, when it falleth suddenly │ evil time, as it falls upon

upon them. │ them――suddenly.

(12.) =For also not knows= (it is the verb which is here negatived)

=the man= (humanity) =his time= (with את, which the LXX. note by the

article), =as fishes which may be caught= (contract relative and plural

niphal) =in a net, the evil one= (an evil net), =and like also birds=

when =caught in a snare= (notice the difference between שנאחזים, which

is niphal participle plural, occurs Genesis xxii. 13, and האחזות, pual

participle, ‘the fishes are _caught_, the birds are _held_’); =like

them= _are_ =ensnared= (יוקשים, see Deuteronomy vii. 25) =the sons

of the Adam to a time= (which is) =evil, as when it falls upon them

suddenly.= (It would result from this reasoning that wisdom is of no

use at all; but in order to meet this objection, Koheleth cites an

instance where it was of great value.)

13 ¶ This wisdom have I seen │ Nevertheless, I have observed

also under the sun, and it │ the following instance of

_seemed_ great unto me: │ wisdom in this work-day world,

│ and which appeared to me of

│ great moment.

(13.) =Moreover, this I have seen= (_i.e._ an instance of) =a wisdom

under the sun= (_i.e._ in this world, where wisdom avails so little),

=and great= (but the noun is an abstract, ‘of great value’ or

importance, ‘a really great thing’) =is it with regard to me= (LXX.,

πρὸς, _i.e._ he considered that, notwithstanding the observation above,

he ought to take it as of considerable account; here was an unexpected

deliverance, by means of wisdom, from one of those snares, מצודים,

spoken of above).

14 _There was_ a little │ There was a little city, and

city, and few men within it; │ the men therein were a few; and

and there came a great king │ there came a great king against

against it, and besieged it, │ it, and invested it, and built

and built great bulwarks │ a net-work [of fortifications]

against it: │ around it.

(14.) =A city small, and the men= (אנשים, ‘weak men’) =in it= (emphatic,

‘in that same’) =a few, and there came against it a king= (who was)

=great, and he surrounded it, and built over against it networks very

great ones;=

15 Now there was found in it │ Now there was found therein

a poor wise man, and he by his │ a poor wise working man, and

wisdom delivered the city; yet │ _he_ it was who saved the city

no man remembered that same │ by his wisdom; yet men did

poor man. │ not remember that same person

│ because he was a poor working

│ man.

(15.) =and was found in it= (again emphatic) =a man= (איש, the rest

are אנשים) =poor= (chapter iv. 13, and here only, מסכן, LXX. πένητα. The

meaning of πένης is that kind of poverty which seeks its food by labour,

and differs from πτωχὸς, which signifies a mendicant. Fuerst gives the

derivation, ס־כן, of the root, which would imply such a meaning as the

LXX. have), =wise= (there is no copula between these two qualifying

words. It is not a poor _and_ wise man, but a man economically

wise――who could make his wisdom go a long way), =and saved= (even)

=he= (the turn of meaning is, that the safety of the city was found

in himself, as the embodiment of wisdom) =the city= (with את emphatic,

which the LXX. notice by the rendering, δ ι α σώσῃ αὐτὸς τ ὴ ν πόλιν)

=in his wisdom; and a man= (not exactly ‘humanity,’ which we have seen

would require the article, but ‘man’ as representing the individuals

generally) =did not remember= (the verb follows the nominative), =with

respect to that man= (את, with the article, which the LXX. notice by

σὺν, with a _genitive_! but in reality the genitive is governed by the

verb, σὺν being adverbial), =the poor one, even that same=. (The shade

of meaning given by the article is, that mankind, as a rule, do not

adequately remember, and so neither reward, wisdom when associated

with poverty. ‘The poor inventor and his sorrows,’ have passed into a

proverb.)

16 Then said I, Wisdom │ Yet _I_ should say myself that

_is_ better than strength: │ wisdom was a real good, and

nevertheless the poor man’s │ better than strength, yet the

wisdom _is_ despised, and his │ wisdom of the poor working man

words are not heard. │ is despised, and his words just

│ those which are not listened to.

(16.) =Then said I= (in opposition to ‘man,’ above), =good= is =wisdom

above might; and the wisdom of the poor= (with the article) =is

despised, and his words= (or reasonings, used still in the technical

sense common to this book) are those =which are not listened to.=

17 The words of wise _men │ These words of the wise in

are_ heard in quiet more than │ a silence are heard:

the cry of him that ruleth │

among fools. │ More than the shriek of a

│ ruler with fools.

(17.) =Those words= (repeated) of =wise men in rest are heard= (but

notice בנחת is an ambiguous word,――see Job xxxvi. 16; the root נחת is to

press down, and hence the equivoke. These words of the wise man in ‘a

going down’ are those which are heard, _i.e._ in a ‘time of pressure,’

or in distress; ‘in quiet,’ is also a meaning, and a very good one,

being that which expresses, without doubt, the main intent in the

passage) =above the cry= (Genesis xviii. 20. Fuerst considers that צעק

is an older form and זעק modern, yet both are used in Genesis xviii.

20, 21, but the references will be seen to support the idea that זעקה

is the ‘cry of emotion,’ while צעקה is any ‘loud cry;’ if so, there is

a special reason why it should be used in this place. Again, מזעקה might

be a participle meaning a ‘cry of distress,’ thus giving force to the

equivoke), =of a ruler with the befooled.=

18 Wisdom _is_ better than │ A real good is wisdom above

weapons of war: but one sinner │ weapons of fight: but a single

destroyeth much good. │ erring sinner destroys this

│ good very much.

(18.) =A good= (repeated, so that it corroborates what is found in

verse 16) is =wisdom above weapons= of =an encounter, and sinning once=

(in the sense of making a wicked mistake, or ‘one wicked mistaker,’

either person or thing) =destroys good the much.=

A commentary on Ecclesiastes · 第 9 / 13 章