Somewhat different evidence, however, is given by Dr. Winslow Lewis:[17]

"Their only manner of walking was on their posterior or inferior

extremities, the others being raised upwards to preserve their

equilibrium, as rope-dancers are assisted by long poles at fairs. Their

progression was not by placing one foot before the other, but by

simultaneously using both, as in jumping." Dr. Salomon Müller also

states that the Gibbons progress upon the ground by a short series of

tottering jumps, effected only by the hind limbs, the body being held

altogether upright.

[Illustration: FIG. 8.--A Gibbon (_H. pileatus_), after Wolf.]

But Mr. Martin (l. c. p. 418), who also speaks from direct observation,

says of the Gibbons generally:

"Pre-eminently qualified for arboreal habits, and

displaying among the branches amazing activity, the

Gibbons are not so awkward or embarrassed on a level

surface as might be imagined. They walk erect, with a

waddling or unsteady gait, but at a quick pace; the

equilibrium of the body requiring to be kept up, either

by touching the ground with the knuckles, first on one

side then on the other, or by uplifting the arms so as to

poise it. As with the Chimpanzee, the whole of the

narrow, long sole of the foot is placed upon the ground

at once and raised at once, without any elasticity of

step."

After this mass of concurrent and independent testimony, it cannot

reasonably be doubted that the Gibbons commonly and habitually assume

the erect attitude.

But level ground is not the place where these animals can display their

very remarkable and peculiar locomotive powers, and that prodigious

activity which almost tempts one to rank them among flying rather than

among ordinary climbing mammals.

Mr. Martin (l. c. p. 430) has given so excellent and graphic an account

of the movements of a _Hylobates agilis_, living in the Zoological

Gardens, in 1840, that I will quote it in full:

"It is almost impossible to convey in words an idea of

the quickness and graceful address of her movements: they

may indeed be termed aerial, as she seems merely to touch

in her progress the branches among which she exhibits her

evolutions. In these feats her hands and arms are the

sole organs of locomotion; her body hanging as if

suspended by a rope, sustained by one hand (the right,

for example), she launches herself, by an energetic

movement, to a distant branch, which she catches with the

left hand; but her hold is less than momentary: the

impulse for the next launch is acquired: the branch then

aimed at is attained by the right hand again, and quitted

instantaneously, and so on, in alternate succession. In

this manner spaces of twelve and eighteen feet are

cleared, with the greatest ease and uninterruptedly, for

hours together, without the slightest appearance of

fatigue being manifested; and it is evident that, if more

space could be allowed, distances very greatly exceeding

eighteen feet would be as easily cleared; so that

Duvaucel's assertion that he has seen these animals

launch themselves from one branch to another, forty feet

asunder, startling as it is, may be well credited.

Sometimes, on seizing a branch in her progress, she will

throw herself, by the power of one arm only, completely

round it, making a revolution with such rapidity as

almost to deceive the eye, and continue her progress with

undiminished velocity. It is singular to observe how

suddenly this Gibbon can stop, when the impetus given by

the rapidity and distance of her swinging leaps would

seem to require a gradual abatement of her movements. In

the very midst of her flight a branch is seized, the body

raised, and she is seen, as if by magic, quietly seated

on it, grasping it with her feet. As suddenly she again

throws herself into action.

"The following facts will convey some notion of her

dexterity and quickness. A live bird was let loose in her

apartment; she marked its flight, made a long swing to a

distant branch, caught the bird with one hand in her

passage, and attained the branch with her other hand; her

aim, both at the bird and at the branch, being as

successful as if one object only had engaged her

attention. It may be added that she instantly bit off the

head of the bird, picked its feathers, and then threw it

down without attempting to eat it.

"On another occasion this animal swung herself from a

perch, across a passage at least twelve feet wide,

against a window which it was thought would be

immediately broken: but not so; to the surprise of all,

she caught the narrow framework between the panes with

her hand, in an instant attained the proper impetus, and

sprang back again to the cage she had left--a feat

requiring not only great strength, but the nicest

precision."

The Gibbons appear to be naturally very gentle, but there is very good

evidence that they will bite severely when irritated--a female

_Hylobates agilis_ having so severely lacerated one man with her long

canines, that he died; while she had injured others so much that, by way

of precaution, these formidable teeth had been filed down; but, if

threatened, she would still turn on her keeper. The Gibbons eat insects,

but appear generally to avoid animal food. A Siamang, however, was seen

by Mr. Bennett to seize and devour greedily a live lizard. They commonly

drink by dipping their fingers in the liquid and then licking them. It

is asserted that they sleep in a sitting posture.

Duvaucel affirms that he has seen the females carry their young to the

waterside and there wash their faces, in spite of resistance and cries.

They are gentle and affectionate in captivity--full of tricks and

pettishness, like spoiled children, and yet not devoid of a certain

conscience, as an anecdote, told by Mr. Bennett (l. c. p. 156), will

show. It would appear that his Gibbon had a peculiar inclination for

disarranging things in the cabin. Among these articles, a piece of soap

would especially attract his notice, and for the removal of this he had

been once or twice scolded. "One morning," says Mr. Bennett, "I was

writing, the ape being present in the cabin, when casting my eyes

towards him, I saw the little fellow taking the soap. I watched him

without his perceiving that I did so: and he occasionally would cast a

furtive glance towards the place where I sat. I pretended to write; he,

seeing me busily occupied, took the soap, and moved away with it in his

paw. When he had walked half the length of the cabin, I spoke quietly,

without frightening him. The instant he found I saw him, he walked back

again, and deposited the soap nearly in the same place from whence he

had taken it. There was certainly something more than instinct in that

action: he evidently betrayed a consciousness of having done wrong both

by his first and last actions--and what is reason if that is not an

exercise of it?"

* * * * *

The most elaborate account of the natural history of the ORANG-UTAN

extant, is that given in the "Verhandelingen over de Natuurlijke

Geschiedenis der Nederlandsche overzeesche Bezittingen (1839-45)," by

Dr. Salomon Müller and Dr. Schlegel, and I shall base what I have to say

upon this subject almost entirely on their statements, adding, here and

there, particulars of interest from the writings of Brooke, Wallace, and

others.

[Illustration: FIG. 9.--An adult male Orang-Utan, after Müller and

Schlegel.]

The Orang-Utan would rarely seem to exceed four feet in height, but the

body is very bulky, measuring two-thirds of the height in

circumference.[18]

The Orang-Utan is found only in Sumatra and Borneo, and is common in

neither of these islands--in both of which it occurs always in low, flat

plains, never in the mountains. It loves the densest and most sombre of

the forests, which extend from the sea-shore inland, and thus is found

only in the eastern half of Sumatra, where alone such forests occur,

though, occasionally, it strays over to the western side.

On the other hand, it is generally distributed through Borneo, except in

the mountains, or where the population is dense. In favourable places,

the hunter may, by good fortune, see three or four in a day.

Except in the pairing time, the old males usually live by themselves.

The old females, and the immature males, on the other hand, are often

met with in twos and threes; and the former occasionally have young with

them, though the pregnant females usually separate themselves, and

sometimes remain apart after they have given birth to their offspring.

The young Orangs seem to remain unusually long under their mother's

protection, probably in consequence of their slow growth. While

climbing, the mother always carries her young against her bosom, the

young holding on by his mother's hair.[19] At what time of life the

Orang-Utan becomes capable of propagation, and how long the females go

with young, is unknown, but it is probable that they are not adult until

they arrive at ten or fifteen years of age. A female which lived for

five years at Batavia, had not attained one-third the height of the wild

females. It is probable that, after reaching adult years, they go on

growing, though slowly, and that they live to forty or fifty years. The

Dyaks tell of old Orangs, which have not only lost all their teeth, but

which find it so troublesome to climb, that they maintain themselves on

windfalls and juicy herbage.

The Orang is sluggish, exhibiting none of that marvellous activity

characteristic of the Gibbons. Hunger alone seems to stir him to

exertion, and when it is stilled he relapses into repose. When the

animal sits, it curves its back and bows its head, so as to look

straight down on the ground; sometimes it holds on with its hands by a

higher branch, sometimes lets them hang phlegmatically down by its

side--and in these positions the Orang will remain, for hours together,

in the same spot, almost without stirring, and only now and then giving

utterance to its deep, growling voice. By day, he usually climbs from

one tree-top to another, and only at night descends to the ground, and

if then threatened with danger, he seeks refuge among the underwood.

When not hunted, he remains a long time in the same locality, and

sometimes stops for many days on the same tree--a firm place among its

branches serving him for a bed. It is rare for the Orang to pass the

night in the summit of a large tree, probably because it is too windy

and cold there for him; but, as soon as night draws on, he descends from

the height and seeks out a fit bed in the lower and darker part, or in

the leafy top of a small tree, among which he prefers Nibong Palms,

Pandani, or one of those parasitic Orchids which give the primæval

forests of Borneo so characteristic and striking an appearance. But

wherever he determines to sleep, there he prepares himself a sort of

nest: little boughs and leaves are drawn together round the selected

spot, and bent crosswise over one another; while to make the bed soft,

great leaves of Ferns, of Orchids, of _Pandanus fascicularis_, _Nipa

fruticans_, &c., are laid over them. Those which Müller saw, many of

them being very fresh, were situated at a height of ten to twenty-five

feet above the ground, and had a circumference, on the average, of two

or three feet. Some were packed many inches thick with _Pandanus_

leaves; others were remarkable only for the cracked twigs, which, united

in a common centre, formed a regular platform. "The rude _hut_," says

Sir James Brooke, "which they are stated to build in the trees, would be

more properly called a seat or nest, for it has no roof or cover of any

sort. The facility with which they form this nest is curious, and I had

an opportunity of seeing a wounded female weave the branches together

and seat herself, within a minute."

According to the Dyaks, the Orang rarely leaves his bed before the sun

is well above the horizon and has dissipated the mists. He gets up about

nine, and goes to bed again about five; but sometimes not till late in

the twilight. He lies sometimes on his back; or, by way of change, turns

on one side or the other, drawing his limbs up to his body, and resting

his head on his hand. When the night is cold, windy, or rainy, he

usually covers his body with a heap of _Pandanus_, _Nipa_, or Fern

leaves, like those of which his bed is made, and he is especially

careful to wrap up his head in them. It is this habit of covering

himself up which has probably led to the fable that the Orang builds

huts in the trees.

Although the Orang resides mostly amid the boughs of great trees, during

the daytime, he is very rarely seen squatting on a thick branch, as

other apes, and particularly the Gibbons, do. The Orang, on the

contrary, confines himself to the slender leafy branches, so that he is

seen right at the top of the trees, a mode of life which is closely

related to the constitution of his hinder limbs, and especially to that

of his seat. For this is provided with no callosities, such as are

possessed by many of the lower apes, and even by the Gibbons; and those

bones of the pelvis, which are termed the ischia, and which form the

solid framework of the surface on which the body rests in the sitting

posture, are not expanded like those of the apes which possess

callosities, but are more like those of man.

An Orang climbs so slowly and cautiously,[20] as, in this act, to

resemble a man more than an ape, taking great care of his feet, so that

injury of them seems to affect him far more than it does other apes.

Unlike the Gibbons, whose forearms do the greater part of the work, as

they swing from branch to branch, the Orang never makes even the

smallest jump. In climbing, he moves alternately one hand and one foot,

or, after having laid fast hold with the hands, he draws up both feet

together. In passing from one tree to another, he always seeks out a

place where the twigs of both come close together, or interlace. Even

when closely pursued, his circumspection is amazing: he shakes the

branches to see if they will bear him, and then bending an overhanging

bough down by throwing his weight gradually along it, he makes a bridge

from the tree he wishes to quit to the next.[21]

On the ground the Orang always goes laboriously and shakily, on all

fours. At starting he will run faster than a man, though he may soon be

overtaken. The very long arms which, when he runs, are but little bent,

raise the body of the Orang remarkably, so that he assumes much the

posture of a very old man bent down by age, and making his way along by

the help of a stick. In walking, the body is usually directed straight

forward, unlike the other apes, which run more or less obliquely; except

the Gibbons, who in these, as in so many other respects, depart

remarkably from their fellows.

The Orang cannot put its feet flat on the ground, but is supported upon

their outer edges, the heel resting more on the ground, while the curved

toes partly rest upon the ground by the upper side of their first joint,

the two outermost toes of each foot completely resting on this surface.

The hands are held in the opposite manner, their inner edges serving as

the chief support. The fingers are then bent out in such a manner that

their foremost joints, especially those of the two innermost fingers,

rest upon the ground by their upper sides, while the point of the free

and straight thumb serves as an additional fulcrum.

The Orang never stands on its hind legs, and all the pictures,

representing it as so doing, are as false as the assertion that it

defends itself with sticks, and the like.

The long arms are of especial use, not only in climbing, but in the

gathering of food from boughs to which the animal could not trust his

weight. Figs, blossoms, and young leaves of various kinds, constitute

the chief nutriment of the Orang; but strips of bamboo two or three feet

long were found in the stomach of a male. They are not known to eat

living animals.

Although, when taken young, the Orang-Utan soon becomes domesticated,

and indeed seems to court human society, it is naturally a very wild and

shy animal, though apparently sluggish and melancholy. The Dyaks affirm,

that when the old males are wounded with arrows only, they will

occasionally leave the trees and rush raging upon their enemies, whose

sole safety lies in instant flight, as they are sure to be killed if

caught.[22]

But, though possessed of immense strength, it is rare for the Orang to

attempt to defend itself, especially when attacked with fire-arms. On

such occasions he endeavours to hide himself, or to escape along the

topmost branches of the trees, breaking off and throwing down the

boughs as he goes. When wounded he betakes himself to the highest

attainable point of the tree, and emits a singular cry, consisting at

first of high notes, which at length deepen into a low roar, not unlike

that of a panther. While giving out the high notes the Orang thrusts out

his lips into a funnel shape; but in uttering the low notes he holds his

mouth wide open, and at the same time the great throat bag, or laryngeal

sac, becomes distended.

According to the Dyaks, the only animal the Orang measures his strength

with is the crocodile, who occasionally seizes him on his visits to the

water side. But they say that the Orang is more than a match for his

enemy, and beats him to death, or rips up his throat by pulling the jaws

asunder!

Much of what has been here stated was probably derived by Dr. Müller

from the reports of his Dyak hunters; but a large male, four feet high,

lived in captivity, under his observation, for a month, and receives a

very bad character.

"He was a very wild beast," says Müller, "of prodigious strength, and

false and wicked to the last degree. If any one approached he rose up

slowly with a low growl, fixed his eyes in the direction in which he

meant to make his attack, slowly passed his hand between the bars of his

cage, and then extending his long arm, gave a sudden grip--usually at

the face." He never tried to bite (though Orangs will bite one another),

his great weapons of offence and defence being his hands.

His intelligence was very great; and Müller remarks, that though the

faculties of the Orang have been estimated too highly, yet Cuvier, had

he seen this specimen, would not have considered its intelligence to be

only a little higher than that of the dog.

His hearing was very acute, but the sense of vision seemed to be less

perfect. The under lip was the great organ of touch, and played a very

important part in drinking, being thrust out like a trough, so as either

to catch the falling rain, or to receive the contents of the half

cocoa-nut shell full of water with which the Orang was supplied, and

which, in drinking, he poured into the trough thus formed.

In Borneo the Orang-Utan of the Malays goes by the name of "_Mias_"

among the Dyaks, who distinguish several kinds as _Mias Pappan_, or

_Zimo_, _Mias Kassu_, and _Mias Rambi_. Whether these are distinct

species, however, or whether they are mere races, and how far any of

them are identical with the Sumatran Orang, as Mr. Wallace thinks the

Mias Pappan to be, are problems which are at present undecided; and the

variability of these great apes is so extensive, that the settlement of

the question is a matter of great difficulty. Of the form called "Mias

Pappan," Mr. Wallace[23] observes, "It is known by its large size, and

by the lateral expansion of the face into fatty protuberances, or

ridges, over the temporal muscles, which have been mis-termed

_callosities_, as they are perfectly soft, smooth, and flexible. Five of

this form, measured by me, varied only from 4 feet 1 inch to 4 feet 2

inches in height, from the heel to the crown of the head, the girth of

the body from 3 feet to 3 feet 7-1/2 inches, and the extent of the

outstretched arms from 7 feet 2 inches to 7 feet 6 inches; the width of

the face from 10 to 13-1/4 inches. The colour and length of the hair

varied in different individuals, and in different parts of the same

individual; some possessed a rudimentary nail on the great toe, others

none at all; but they otherwise present no external differences on which

to establish even varieties of a species.

"Yet, when we examine the crania of these individuals, we find

remarkable differences of form, proportion, and dimension, no two being

exactly alike. The slope of the profile, and the projection of the

muzzle, together with the size of the cranium, offer differences as

decided as those existing between the most strongly marked forms of the

Caucasian and African crania in the human species. The orbits vary in

width and height, the cranial ridge is either single or double, either

much or little developed, and the zygomatic aperture varies considerably

in size. This variation in the proportions of the crania enables us

satisfactorily to explain the marked difference presented by the

single-crested and double-crested skulls, which have been thought to

prove the existence of two large species of Orang. The external surface

of the skull varies considerably in size, as do also the zygomatic

aperture and the temporal muscle; but they bear no necessary relation to

each other, a small muscle often existing with a large cranial surface,

and _vice versâ_. Now, those skulls which have the largest and strongest

jaws and the widest zygomatic aperture, have the muscles so large that

they meet on the crown of the skull, and deposit the bony ridge which

separates them, and which is the highest in that which has the smallest

cranial surface. In those which combine a large surface with

comparatively weak jaws, and small zygomatic aperture, the muscles, on

each side, do not extend to the crown, a space of from 1 to 2 inches

remaining between them, and along their margins small ridges are formed.

Intermediate forms are found, in which the ridges meet only in the

hinder part of the skull. The form and size of the ridges are therefore

independent of age, being sometimes more strongly developed in the less

aged animal. Professor Temminck states that the series of skulls in the

Leyden Museum shows the same result."

Mr. Wallace observed two male adult Orangs (Mias Kassu of the Dyaks),

however, so very different from any of these that he concludes them to

be specifically distinct; they were respectively 3 feet 8-1/2 inches and

3 feet 9-1/2 inches high, and possessed no sign of the cheek

excrescences, but otherwise resembled the larger kinds. The skull has

no crest, but two bony ridges, 1-3/4 inches to 2 inches apart, as in the

_Simia morio_ of Professor Owen. The teeth, however, are immense,

equalling or surpassing those of the other species. The females of both

these kinds, according to Mr. Wallace, are devoid of excrescences, and

resemble the smaller males, but are shorter by 1-1/2 to 3 inches, and

their canine teeth are comparatively small, subtruncated and dilated at

the base, as in the so-called _Simia morio_, which is, in all

probability, the skull of a female of the same species as the smaller

males. Both males and females of this smaller species are

distinguishable, according to Mr. Wallace, by the comparatively large

size of the middle incisors of the upper jaw.

* * * * *

So far as I am aware, no one has attempted to dispute the accuracy of

the statements which I have just quoted regarding the habits of the two

Asiatic man-like Apes; and if true, they must be admitted as evidence,

that such an Ape--

1stly, May readily move along the ground in the erect, or semi-erect,

position, and without direct support from its arms.

2ndly, That it may possess an extremely loud voice, so loud as to be

readily heard one or two miles.

3rdly, That it may be capable of great viciousness and violence when

irritated: and this is especially true of adult males.

4thly, That it may build a nest to sleep in.

Such being well-established facts respecting the Asiatic Anthropoids,

analogy alone might justify us in expecting the African species to offer

similar peculiarities, separately or combined; or, at any rate, would

destroy the force of any attempted _à priori_ argument against such

direct testimony as might be adduced in favour of their existence. And,

if the organization of any of the African Apes could be demonstrated to

fit it better than either of its Asiatic allies for the erect position

and for efficient attack, there would be still less reason for doubting

its occasional adoption of the upright attitude or of aggressive

proceedings.

From the time of Tyson and Tulpius downwards, the habits of the young

CHIMPANZEE in a state of captivity have been abundantly reported and

commented upon. But trustworthy evidence as to the manners and customs

of adult anthropoids of this species, in their native woods, was almost

wanting up to the time of the publication of the paper by Dr. Savage, to

which I have already referred; containing notes of the observations

which he made, and of the information which he collected from sources

which he considered trustworthy, while resident at Cape Palmas, at the

north-western limit of the Bight of Benin.

The adult Chimpanzees, measured by Dr. Savage, never exceeded, though

the males may almost attain, five feet in height.

"When at rest, the sitting posture is that generally

assumed. They are sometimes seen standing and walking,

but when thus detected, they immediately take to all

fours, and flee from the presence of the observer. Such

is their organization that they cannot stand erect, but

lean forward. Hence they are seen, when standing, with

the hands clasped over the occiput, or the lumbar region,

which would seem necessary to balance or ease of posture.

"The toes of the adult are strongly flexed and turned

inwards, and cannot be perfectly straightened. In the

attempt the skin gathers into thick folds on the back,

shewing that the full expansion of the foot, as is

necessary in walking, is unnatural. The natural position

is on all fours, the body anteriorly resting upon the

knuckles. These are greatly enlarged, with the skin

protuberant and thickened like the sole of the foot.

"They are expert climbers, as one would suppose from

their organization. In their gambols they swing from limb

to limb to a great distance, and leap with astonishing

agility. It is not unusual to see the 'old folks' (in the

language of an observer) sitting under a tree regaling

themselves with fruit and friendly chat, while their

'children' are leaping around them, and swinging from

tree to tree with boisterous merriment.

"As seen here, they cannot be called _gregarious_, seldom

more than five, or ten at most, being found together. It

has been said, on good authority, that they occasionally

assemble in large numbers, in gambols. My informant

asserts that he saw once not less than fifty so engaged;

hooting, screaming, and drumming with sticks upon old

logs, which is done in the latter case with equal

facility by the four extremities. They do not appear ever

to act on the offensive, and seldom, if ever really, on

the defensive. When about to be captured, they resist by

throwing their arms about their opponent, and attempting

to draw him into contact with their teeth." (Savage, l.

c. p. 384.)

With respect to this last point Dr. Savage is very explicit in another

place:

"_Biting_ is their principal art of defence. I have seen

one man who had been thus severely wounded in the feet.

"The strong development of the canine teeth in the adult

would seem to indicate a carnivorous propensity; but in

no state save that of domestication do they manifest it.

At first they reject flesh, but easily acquire a fondness

for it. The canines are early developed, and evidently

designed to act the important part of weapons of defence.

When in contact with man almost the first effort of the

animal is--_to bite_.

"They avoid the abodes of men, and build their

habitations in trees. Their construction is more that of

_nests_ than _hut_, as they have been erroneously termed

by some naturalists. They generally build not far above

the ground. Branches or twigs are bent, or partly broken,

and crossed, and the whole supported by the body of a

limb or a crotch. Sometimes a nest will be found near the

_end_ of a _strong leafy branch_ twenty or thirty feet

from the ground. One I have lately seen that could not be

less than forty feet, and more probably it was fifty. But

this is an unusual height.

"Their dwelling-place is not permanent, but changed in

pursuit of food and solitude, according to the force of

circumstances. We more often see them in elevated places;

but this arises from the fact that the low grounds, being

more favourable for the natives' rice-farms, are the

oftener cleared, and hence are almost always wanting in

suitable trees for their nests.... It is seldom that more

than one or two nests are seen upon the same tree, or in

the same neighbourhood: five have been found, but it was

an unusual circumstance....

"They are very filthy in their habits.... It is a

tradition with the natives generally here, that they were

once members of their own tribe: that for their depraved

habits they were expelled from all human society, and,

that through an obstinate indulgence of their vile

propensities, they have degenerated into their present

state and organization. They are, however, eaten by them,

and when cooked with the oil and pulp of the palm-nut

considered a highly palatable morsel.

"They exhibit a remarkable degree of intelligence in

their habits, and, on the part of the mother, much

affection for their young. The second female described

was upon a tree when first discovered, with her mate and

two young ones (a male and a female). Her first impulse

was to descend with great rapidity, and make off into the

thicket, with her mate and female offspring. The young

male remaining behind, she soon returned to the rescue.

She ascended and took him in her arms, at which moment

she was shot, the ball passing through the forearm of the

young one, on its way to the heart of the mother....

"In a recent case, the mother, when discovered, remained

upon the tree with her offspring, watching intently the

movements of the hunter. As he took aim, she motioned

with her hand, precisely in the manner of a human being,

to have him desist and go away. When the wound has not

proved instantly fatal, they have been known to stop the

flow of blood by pressing with the hand upon the part,

and when this did not succeed, to apply leaves and

grass.... When shot, they give a sudden screech, not

unlike that of a human being in sudden and acute

distress."

The ordinary voice of the Chimpanzee, however, is affirmed to be hoarse,

guttural, and not very loud, somewhat like "whoo-whoo" (l. c. p. 365).

The analogy of the Chimpanzee to the Orang, in its nest-building habit

and in the mode of forming its nest, is exceedingly interesting; while,

on the other hand, the activity of this ape, and its tendency to bite,

are particulars in which it rather resembles the Gibbons. In extent of

geographical range, again, the Chimpanzees--which are found from Sierra

Leone to Congo--remind one of the Gibbons, rather than of either of

the other man-like Apes; and it seems not unlikely that, as is the case

with the Gibbons, there may be several species spread over the

geographical area of the genus.

The same excellent observer, from whom I have borrowed the preceding

account of the habits of the adult Chimpanzee, published, fifteen years

ago,[24] an account of the GORILLA, which has, in its most essential

points, been confirmed by subsequent observers, and to which so very

little has really been added, that in justice to Dr. Savage I give it

almost in full.

"It should be borne in mind that my account is based upon

the statements of the aborigines of that region (the

Gaboon). In this connection, it may also be proper for me

to remark, that having been a missionary resident for

several years, studying, from habitual intercourse, the

African mind and character, I felt myself prepared to

discriminate and decide upon the probability of their

statements. Besides, being familiar with the history and

habits of its interesting congener (_Trog. niger_,

Geoff.), I was able to separate their accounts of the two

animals, which, having the same locality and a similarity

of habit, are confounded in the minds of the mass,

especially as but few--such as traders to the interior

and huntsmen--have ever seen the animal in question.

"The tribe from which our knowledge of the animal is

derived, and whose territory forms its habitat, is the

_Mpongwe_, occupying both banks of the River Gaboon, from

its mouth to some fifty or sixty miles upward....

"If the word 'Pongo' be of African origin, it is probably

a corruption of the word _Mpongwe_, the name of the tribe

on the banks of the Gaboon, and hence applied to the

region they inhabit. Their local name for the Chimpanzee

is _Enché-eko_, as near as it can be Anglicized, from

which the common term 'Jocko' probably comes. The Mpongwe

appellation for its new congener is _Engé-ena_,

prolonging the sound of the first vowel, and slightly

sounding the second.

[Illustration: FIG. 10.--The Gorilla (after Wolff).]

"The habitat of the _Engé-ena_ is the interior of lower

Guinea, whilst that of the _Enché-eko_ is nearer the

sea-board.

"Its height is about five feet; it is disproportionately

broad across the shoulders, thickly covered with coarse

black hair, which is said to be similar in its

arrangement to that of the _Enché-eko_; with age it

becomes grey, which fact has given rise to the report

that both animals are seen of different colours.

"_Head._--The prominent features of the head are, the

great width and elongation of the face, the depth of the

molar region, the branches of the lower jaw being very

deep and extending far backward, and the comparative

smallness of the cranial portion; the eyes are very

large, and said to be like those of the Enché-eko, a

bright hazel; nose broad and flat, slightly elevated

towards the root; the muzzle broad, and prominent lips

and chin, with scattered grey hairs; the under lip highly

mobile, and capable of great elongation when the animal

is enraged, then hanging over the chin; skin of the face

and ears naked, and of a dark brown, approaching to

black.

"The most remarkable feature of the head is a high ridge,

or crest of hair, in the course of the sagittal suture,

which meets posteriorly with a transverse ridge of the

same, but less prominent, running round from the back of

one ear to the other. The animal has the power of moving

the scalp freely forward and back, and when enraged is

said to contract it strongly over the brow, thus bringing

down the hairy ridge and pointing the hair forward, so as

to present an indescribably ferocious aspect.

"Neck short, thick, and hairy; chest and shoulders very

broad, said to be fully double the size of the

Enché-ekos; arms very long, reaching some way below the

knee--the forearm much the shortest; hands very large,

the thumbs much larger than the fingers....

"The gait is shuffling; the motion of the body, which is

never upright as in man, but bent forward, is somewhat

rolling, or from side to side. The arms being longer than

the Chimpanzee, it does not stoop as much in walking;

like that animal, it makes progression by thrusting its

arms forward, resting the hands on the ground, and then

giving the body a half jumping half swinging motion

between them. In this act it is said not to flex the

fingers, as does the Chimpanzee, resting on its

knuckles, but to extend them, making a fulcrum of the

hand. When it assumes the walking posture, to which it is

said to be much inclined, it balances its huge body by

flexing its arms upward.

"They live in bands, but are not so numerous as the

Chimpanzees: the females generally exceed the other sex

in number. My informants all agree in the assertion that

but one adult male is seen in a band; that when the young

males grow up, a contest takes place for mastery, and the

strongest, by killing and driving out the others,

establishes himself as the head of the community."

Dr. Savage repudiates the stories about the Gorillas carrying off women

and vanquishing elephants, and then adds:

"Their dwellings, if they may be so called, are similar

to those of the Chimpanzee, consisting simply of a few

sticks and leafy branches, supported by the crotches and

limbs of trees: they afford no shelter, and are occupied

only at night.

[Illustration: FIG. 11.--Gorilla walking (after Wolff).]

"They are exceedingly ferocious, and always offensive in

their habits, never running from man, as does the

Chimpanzee. They are objects of terror to the natives,

and are never encountered by them except on the

defensive. The few that have been captured were killed by

elephant-hunters and native traders, as they came

suddenly upon them while passing through the forests.

"It is said that when the male is first seen he gives a

terrific yell, that resounds far and wide through the

forest, something like kh--ah! kh--ah! prolonged and

shrill. His enormous jaws are widely opened at each

expiration, his under lip hangs over the chin, and the

hairy ridge and scalp are contracted upon the brow,

presenting an aspect of indescribable ferocity.

"The females and young, at the first cry, quickly

disappear. He then approaches the enemy in great fury,

pouring out his horrid cries in quick succession. The

hunter awaits his approach with his gun extended: if his

aim is not sure, he permits the animal to grasp the

barrel, and as he carries it to his mouth (which is his

habit) he fires. Should the gun fail to go off, the

barrel (that of the ordinary musket, which is thin) is

crushed between his teeth, and the encounter soon proves

fatal to the hunter.

"In the wild state, their habits are in general like

those of the _Troglodytes niger_, building their nests

loosely in trees, living on similar fruits, and changing

their place of resort from force of circumstances."

Dr. Savage's observations were confirmed and supplemented by those of

Mr. Ford, who communicated an interesting paper on the Gorilla to the

Philadelphian Academy of Sciences, in 1852. With respect to the

geographical distribution of this greatest of all the man-like Apes, Mr.

Ford remarks:

"This animal inhabits the range of mountains that

traverse the interior of Guinea, from the Cameroon in the

north, to Angola in the south, and about 100 miles

inland, and called by the geographers Crystal Mountains.

The limit to which this animal extends, either north or

south, I am unable to define. But that limit is doubtless

some distance north of this river [Gaboon]. I was able to

certify myself of this fact in a late excursion to the

head-waters of the Mooney (Danger) River, which comes

into the sea some sixty miles from this place. I was

informed (credibly, I think) that they were numerous

among the mountains in which that river rises, and far

north of that.

"In the south, this species extends to the Congo River,

as I am told by native traders who have visited the coast

between the Gaboon and that river. Beyond that, I am not

informed. This animal is only found at a distance from

the coast in most cases, and, according to my best

information, approaches it nowhere so nearly as on the

south side of this river, where they have been found

within ten miles of the sea. This, however, is only of

late occurrence. I am informed by some of the oldest

Mpongwe men that formerly he was only found on the

sources of the river, but that at present he may be

found within half-a-day's walk of its mouth. Formerly he

inhabited the mountainous ridge where Bushmen alone

inhabited, but now he boldly approaches the Mpongwe

plantations. This is doubtless the reason of the scarcity

of information in years past, as the opportunities for

receiving a knowledge of the animal have not been

wanting; traders having for one hundred years frequented

this river, and specimens, such as have been brought here

within a year, could not have been exhibited without

having attracted the attention of the most stupid."

One specimen Mr. Ford examined weighed 170 lbs., without the thoracic,

or pelvic, viscera, and measured four feet four inches round the chest.

This writer describes so minutely and graphically the onslaught of the

Gorilla--though he does not for a moment pretend to have witnessed the

scene--that I am tempted to give this part of his paper in full, for

comparison with other narratives:

"He always rises to his feet when making an attack,

though he approaches his antagonist in a stooping

posture.

"Though he never lies in wait, yet, when he hears, sees,

or scents a man, he immediately utters his characteristic

cry, prepares for an attack, and always acts on the

offensive. The cry he utters resembles a grunt more than

a growl, and is similar to the cry of the Chimpanzee,

when irritated, but vastly louder. It is said to be

audible at a great distance. His preparation consists in

attending the females and young ones, by whom he is

usually accompanied, to a little distance. He, however,

soon returns, with his crest erect and projecting

forward, his nostrils dilated, and his under-lip thrown

down; at the same time uttering his characteristic yell,

designed, it would seem, to terrify his antagonist.

Instantly, unless he is disabled by a well-directed shot,

he makes an onset, and, striking his antagonist with the

palm of his hands, or seizing him with a grasp from which

there is no escape, he dashes him upon the ground, and

lacerates him with his tusks.

"He is said to seize a musket, and instantly crush the

barrel between his teeth.... This animal's savage nature

is very well shewn by the implacable desperation of a

young one that was brought here. It was taken very young,

and kept four months, and many means were used to tame

it; but it was incorrigible, so that it bit me an hour

before it died."

Mr. Ford discredits the house-building and elephant-driving stories, and

says that no well-informed natives believe them. They are tales told to

children.

I might quote other testimony to a similar effect, but, as it appears to

me, less carefully weighed and sifted, from the letters of MM. Franquet

and Gautier Laboullay, appended to the memoir of M. I. G. St. Hilaire,

which I have already cited.

Bearing in mind what is known regarding the Orang and the Gibbon, the

statements of Dr. Savage and Mr. Ford do not appear to me to be justly

open to criticism on _à priori_ grounds. The Gibbons, as we have seen,

readily assume the erect posture, but the Gorilla is far better fitted

by its organization for that attitude than are the Gibbons: if the

laryngeal pouches of the Gibbons, as is very likely, are important in

giving volume to a voice which can be heard for half a league, the

Gorilla, which has similar sacs, more largely developed, and whose bulk

is fivefold that of a Gibbon, may well be audible for twice that

distance. If the Orang fights with its hands, the Gibbons and

Chimpanzees with their teeth, the Gorilla may, probably enough, do

either or both; nor is there anything to be said against either

Chimpanzee or Gorilla building a nest, when it is proved that the

Orang-Utan habitually performs that feat.

With all this evidence, now ten to fifteen years old, before the world,

it is not a little surprising that the assertions of a recent traveller,

who, so far as the Gorilla is concerned, really does very little more

than repeat, on his own authority, the statements of Savage and of Ford,

should have met with so much and such bitter opposition. If subtraction

be made of what was known before, the sum and substance of what M. Du

Chaillu has affirmed as a matter of his own observation respecting the

Gorilla, is, that, in advancing to the attack, the great brute beats his

chest with his fists. I confess I see nothing very improbable, or very

much worth disputing about, in this statement.

With respect to the other man-like Apes of Africa, M. Du Chaillu tells

us absolutely nothing, of his own knowledge, regarding the common

Chimpanzee; but he informs us of a bald-headed species or variety, the

_nschiego mbouve_, which builds itself a shelter, and of another rare

kind with a comparatively small face, large facial angle, and peculiar

note, resembling "Kooloo."

As the Orang shelters itself with a rough coverlet of leaves, and the

common Chimpanzee, according to that eminently trustworthy observer Dr.

Savage, makes a sound like "Whoo-whoo,"--the grounds of the summary

repudiation with which M. Du Chaillu's statements on these matters have

been met is not obvious.

If I have abstained from quoting M. Du Chaillu's work, then, it is not

because I discern any inherent improbability in his assertions

respecting the man-like Apes; nor from any wish to throw suspicion on

his veracity; but because, in my opinion, so long as his narrative

remains in its present state of unexplained and apparently inexplicable

confusion, it has no claim to original authority respecting any subject

whatsoever.

It may be truth, but it is not evidence.

Man's Place in Nature, and Other Essays · 第 23 / 61 题