CHAPTER XXII.

BELFAST AND PERPETUITY.

Belfast, not being blessed with a cathedral like Armagh and Derry,

is not called a 'city.' It is only a 'town;' but it is the capital of

Ulster, and surpasses all other places in Ireland in the rapidity of

its progress and in its prosperity. It can boast but little of its

antiquity. There is probably not a house in the borough more than 150

years old. The place is first noticed by history in 1178, merely as

the site of a fort of the O'Neills, which was destroyed by John De

Courcy. It was only a poor village at the time of Bruce's invasion, in

1315, though Spencer erroneously calls it 'a very good town.' It was

so insignificant in 1586 that Holinshed does not mention it among the

towns and havens of Down and Antrim. Whatever town existed there had

been destroyed by the Earl of Kildare when lord-deputy. In 1552 it was

repaired and garrisoned, and shortly after it was granted by the

crown to Hugh O'Neill of Clandeboye. In 1571 the castle, with a large

portion of territory adjoining it, was bestowed upon Sir Thomas Smith

and his son. The latter was assassinated by the 'wicked, barbarous,

and uncivil people;' and the former, not being able to fulfil the

conditions of his tenure, the district reverted with the whole earldom

of Ulster to the crown in the reign of James I. Belfast was then

surrounded by extensive forests, abounding in fine timber for

building. The best specimen--perhaps the only one in the kingdom--of

a forest like what covered the country at that time, still exists at

Shane's Castle, the magnificent demesne of Lord O'Neill, where may be

seen enormous oaks decaying with age, under whose shade probably the

famous Shane marshalled his galloglasse.

In 1613 the castle and manor of Belfast were granted to Sir Arthur

Chichester, lord-deputy, ancestor of the Marquis of Donegal, who did

so much to effect the final conquest of Ulster. He may be said to

be the founder of the town. From the estates of his family, in

Devonshire, and from Scotland, many families came over and made a

strong settlement here. Ultimately it became a corporation sending two

members to the Irish Parliament. The chief magistrate was called 'the

sovereign;' and the first who held the office was Thomas Pottinger,

ancestor of the celebrated Sir Henry Pottinger. In 1758 the population

was 8,549; in 1821, it was 37,000; in 1831, it was 53,000; in 1841, it

had increased to 75,000; in 1851, it amounted to 103,000; and the last

census shows it to be 121,602. About 1,500 houses are built annually

in the borough, and the present population is estimated at 150,000.

The rateable property is more than 394,000 l. The sum of 560,000 l.

has been spent on the harbour improvements, to which is to be added

250,000 l. for building new docks. I remember the quays when they were

small, irregular, inconvenient, dirty, and when the channel worked its

doubtful course through shifting masses of liquid mud, at low water.

Now there are quays which extend in a line about a mile, covered

with spacious sheds for the protection of the goods being shipped

and unshipped. There are docks of all sorts, and great shipbuilding

establishments standing on ground created out of the floating chaos

of mud. 'Year by year,' as one of its poets has said, 'Belfast is

changing its aspect and overstepping its former boundaries, climbing

the hill-side, skirting the river margin, and even invading the sea's

ancient domain.

'Ambition's mistress of the fertile land,

Shuts out the ocean and usurps the strand.'

Among the 'usurpations' is Queen's Island, a beautiful people's

park, standing in the midst of the Lough. The people of Belfast have

effected all these vast improvements from their own resources,

without a shilling from the lord of the soil, without any help from

Government, except a loan of 100,000 l. from the Board of Works.

Belfast is the 'linen capital' of the empire, as Manchester is the

'cotton capital.' The linen trade was fostered in its infancy there

by Strafford, and encouraged by William III., as a set-off against the

abolition of the woollen trade. The first spinning of flax by steam

power was commenced in 1830, by the Messrs. Mulholland, who employ

2,000 hands, principally females. Mills have sprung up in every

direction, and it is estimated that they give employment to 15,000

persons. To supply the consumption of flax, in addition to the home

produce, about 50,000 tons are imported every year. Linen is the

staple manufacture; but industrial arts of every kind flourish, with

all the usual manifestations of wealth.

We have seen in a former chapter that the people of Londonderry, vexed

that the maiden city has been left so far behind her younger sister,

ascribe the difference to the fact that the Belfast manufacturers were

favoured with long building tenures. We hear it said often that the

Marquis of Donegal gave his tenants perpetuity leases, implying that

he acted very liberally in doing so. If, however, you speak to persons

acquainted with the local history, they will ascribe this advantage

to 'Lord Donegal's necessities.' If you ask an explanation of this

phrase, you will be told that towards the end of last century, and

later, Lord Donegal was obliged to adopt extraordinary methods

for raising money, and that the perpetuity leases in question were

purchased, and at a very high rate too. You will further learn that

the tenants were compelled to take the leases, and pay heavy fines for

them in lump sums, and that if unable to produce the money they were

evicted, and their farms were given to others who were able to pay. It

is alleged that his agent got leases in blank, ready to be filled up

when the cash was forthcoming, and that all the cash did not reach the

landlord's hands. At any rate, attempts have been made to break some

of the leases. There has been long pending litigation on the subject.

Whatever may be the defects of title on the part of the landlord,

the tenant must suffer. Dr. Hancock alludes to this fact in his

first report. Referring to Sir John Romilly's Leasing Powers Bill, he

says:--

'The details of these Bills it is not necessary now to refer to; but

there was one principle provided for in them which has been neglected

in subsequent measures. In the ordinary course of business a tenant

does not investigate his landlord's title; the cost of doing so would

be nearly always too great; besides, the landlord would not think of

consenting to the investigation on every occasion of granting a lease.

It follows from this that it is a great hardship, if a flaw should

be discovered in a landlord's title, that leases granted before the

tenants had any notice of the litigation should be bad. Take the

case of the estate which the late Duke of Wellington and Mr.

Leslie recovered from Lord Dungannon after he had been for years in

possession; or the case which is now pending for so many years between

the Marquis of Donegal and Viscount Templemore. Is it not a great

hardship that leases which tenants took, trusting in the title of

Lord Dungannon or Viscount Templemore, who were then visible owners

of great estates, should afterwards turn out to be worthless on some

point of law in title-deeds which they never had the opportunity of

seeing; and which may be so subtle as to take Courts of Law years to

decide?'

Dr. Hancock says the principle that in such cases the tenant should

be protected, was neglected in subsequent measures. Now, what must the

tenants think of legislation that subjects them to be robbed of their

dearly-bought leases because of flaws, frauds or blunders with which

they could have nothing to do? The leases granted to the tenants of

Lord Donegal, however, in Belfast and the neighbourhood were generally

valid, and to these perpetuities we must undoubtedly ascribe the

existence of a middle class of remarkable independence of character,

and the accumulation of capital for manufactures and commerce. Had

Lord Donegal been able to hold the town in a state of tutelage and

dependence--had he been an 'improving landlord' of the modern type,

with an agent like Mr. Trench, so vigilant and curious that a dog

could not bark on the estate without his knowledge and consent,

Belfast might have been far behind Derry to-day--as stationary as

Bangor, Hillsborough, Antrim, or Randalstown. Under such paternal care

as Mr. Trench bestows upon tenants, with his omnipresent surveillance,

there could be no manly self-reliance, no freedom of speech or action,

no enterprise. The agent would take care that no interests should grow

up on the estate, which his chief could not control or knock down. It

is not likely that Lord Donegal would have suffered the landscape to

be spoiled, the atmosphere of the deer park and gardens to be darkened

and tainted by the smoke of factory chimneys, which could add nothing

to his rental, while crowding around him the race which his great

progenitor did so much to extirpate. So Belfast may well be thankful

that the Marquis of Donegal, for some generations, could not afford to

be 'an improving landlord,' fond of paternal intermeddling with other

people's affairs, playing the part of Providence to an inferior race.

But there is one memorable fact connected with those perpetuity leases

which applies more immediately to our purpose. The tenants who were

evicted to make way for the men who had money to advance to the lord

of the soil, feeling themselves seriously aggrieved, formed the first

of the more modern agrarian combinations under the title of 'the

Hearts of Oak;' which continued for a long time to disturb the peace

in Antrim and Down. The farms being extensively turned into pasture

by the landlords and large graziers, there was no employment for the

houseless wanderers, no provision of any kind for their support.

They consequently had no respect for the rights of property, in

the vindication of which their homes had been demolished and their

families sacrificed, because they were not able to purchase fixity of

tenure.

It was, however, very fortunate for Belfast that the landlord was

obliged to sell it; that the head of the great house founded by the

conqueror of Ulster, enriched with territory so vast, should have been

under the necessity of giving a perpetual property in the soil to

some of the sons of industry. By that simple concession he did more to

advance the prosperity of the town, than could have been accomplished

by centuries of fostering care, under the shadow of feudalism. Belfast

shows, on a grand scale, what might be done on many an estate in

Ireland, in many a town and village where the people are pining away

in hopeless misery, if the iron bonds of primogeniture and entail

which now cramp landed property were struck off. The Greek philosopher

declared that if he had a standing-place he could move the earth. Give

to capital the ground of perpetuity of tenure, whereon to plant

its machinery, and it will soon lift this island from the slough of

despond. Then may it be said more truly than Grattan said it in 1782,

that Ireland had got nearer to the sun.

The Land-War in Ireland: A History for the Times · 第 22 / 25 章