HISTORY OF FRANCE.

The Franks, a tribe of German origin, had marched from their

hereditary possessions on the Lower Rhine to the Meuse and the Sambre,

A. D. 486. From this place, their warlike king, Clovis, led them forth

to war and plunder. After he had conquered and put to death the last

Roman governor, Syágrius, in Soissons, and made himself master of the

country between the Seine and the Loire, he advanced against the

Alemanni, who were in possession of an extensive kingdom on both banks

of the Rhine. He defeated them in the great battle of Zülpich (between

Bonn and Aix), and subjected their country on the Moselle and the

Lahn. In the heat of the battle, Clovis had sworn, that if the

doubtful combat should terminate in his favor, he would embrace the

faith of his Christian wife; and in the same year, he, with 8,000

nobles of his train, received baptism in the waters of the Rhine. But

Christianity produced no emotions of pity in his savage heart. After

he had extended the Frank empire to the Rhone on the east, and to the

Garónne on the south, he attempted to secure the whole territory to

himself and his posterity, by putting to death the chiefs of all the

Frank tribes.

The wickedness of the father was inherited by his four sons, who,

after Clovis’s death, divided the Frank empire between them; the

eldest received the eastern kingdom, Austrásia, with the capital,

Metz; the three younger sons shared the western territory, Neustria,

and Burgundy, which was connected with it. But the empire was again

from time to time united. The history of the kingly house of

Merovingians displays a frightful picture of human depravity. The

murders of brothers and relatives, bloody civil wars, and the

explosion of unbridled passions, fill its annals. The savage

enormities of the two queens, Brunhilda and Fredigonda, are

particularly dreadful. These horrors at length destroyed all the power

of the race of Clovis, so that they are distinguished in history as

sluggish kings, whilst the steward of the royal possessions (Mayor of

the palace) gradually obtained possession of all the powers of

government. A visit to the yearly assemblies of the people

(Marzfelder), upon a carriage drawn by four oxen, was at last the only

occupation of the imbecile Merovingians. At first, each of the three

kingdoms had its own mayor, until the brave and shrewd Pepin of

Heristal succeeded in uniting the mayoralties of Neustria and Burgundy

with that of Austrásia, and making them hereditary in his own family.

From this time, Pepin’s descendants, who were called dukes of

Francónia, possessed the regal power, whilst the Merovingians were

kings in nothing but name.

Pepin of Heristal, and his son Charles Martel, had gained the

confidence of the nation by their warlike deeds, and the favor of the

priests by their zeal in the propagation of Christianity. Both parties

were instrumental in raising Pepin the Little, the son of Charles

Martel, to the throne of the Franks. For when the assembly of the

nation deposed the last imbecile representative of the Merovingians

(Childeric III), and proclaimed the chief steward, Pepin, king, the

pope confirmed the election, in hope of finding in the Frank ruler a

support against the Longobards and the iconoclastic emperor of

Byzantium. In return for the royal consecration, which was first

performed by Boniface, and afterwards by Pope Stephen himself, Pepin

endowed the Roman chair with the portion of coast on the Adriatic sea,

southwards from Ravenna. This was the foundation of the temporal power

of the pope.

Pepin reigned for sixteen years with vigor and renown over the Frank

empire, which extended far into South and Central Germany, and which,

at his death, he divided between his two sons, Charles and Carloman.

About three years afterwards, A. D. 771, Carloman died, and

Charlemagne (Charles the Great) was declared sole ruler of the Franks,

by the voice of the estates of the Empire. He conducted many wars, and

advanced Christian cultivation and civil order. For the purpose of

securing the boundaries of his kingdom and extending Christianity, he

made war for thirty-one years on the Saxon confederation, which was

formed by various Pagan tribes on the Weser and Elbe. Charles took the

fortress of Eresburg, on the south of the Teutoburger forest,

destroyed the national palladium――the statue of Arminius, and

compelled the Saxons to a peace. He next proceeded against the

Longobard king, Desidérius, in obedience to the summons of Pope

Adrian. With an army collected together near Geneva, he crossed the

St. Bernard, stormed the passes of the Alps, and conquered Pavia.

Desidérius ended his days in a cloister. Charles erected the Lombard

throne in Milan, united Upper Italy to the kingdom of the Franks, and

confirmed the gifts made by Pepin to the pope.

During the absence of Charles, the Saxons had expelled the Frank

garrisons and reëstablished their ancient boundaries. Charles again

marched into their country, subdued them, and compelled the chiefs of

the tribes to submit at Paderborn. Their warlike duke, Witikind,

alone, fled to the Danes and refused to confirm the treaty. In the two

following years, Charles fought against the Moors in Spain, took

Pampelona and Saragossa, and united the whole country, as far as the

Ebro, to his own kingdom, as a Spanish province. But during his

return, his rear, under the command of Roland, suffered a defeat in

the valley of Roncesválles, in which the bravest champions of the

Franks were destroyed. Roland’s battle at Roncesválles was a favorite

theme with the poets of the middle ages. The Saxons took advantage of

his absence to make a fresh insurrection, and pursued their

devastating course as far as the Rhine. Charles hastened to the spot,

gave them repeated overthrows, and subdued their land afresh. But when

he attempted to employ them as militia against the Slavonic tribes in

the East, they fell upon the Frank troops who were marching with them,

at the Suntal (between Hanover and Hameln), and slew them. This

demanded vengeance. The Frank emperor marched through the land,

plundering and destroying, and then held a court of judgment at Verden

on the Aller. 4,500 prisoners expiated with their blood the crime of

their brethren. Upon this, hostilities were resumed with fresh

violence. But the battle on the Hase, which terminated to the

disadvantage of the Saxons, put an end to the war. Witikind and the

other chiefs took an oath of fealty and military service, and allowed

themselves to be baptised. The people followed their example. Eight

bishoprics provided for the maintenance and extension of Christianity

among the Saxons. Another insurrection, however, was occasioned a few

years afterwards, by the oppressive _arriere-ban_, and the unwonted

payment of tithes to the Church, which resulted in 10,000 Saxon

families being carried away from their homes, and colonies of Franks

being established in their place. To oppose the Slavonic tribes to the

east of the Elbe, Charles founded the Margraviate of Brandenburg.

Shortly after, Thassilo duke of Bavaria, attempted to render himself

independent of the Frank power, by the assistance of the Avars, who

lived to the east. He was overpowered, and expiated his breach of

faith by perpetual confinement within the walls of the cloisters of

Fulda. Bavaria was hereupon incorporated with the Frank empire, and

Charles established the Eastern Margraviate as a check upon the wild

Avars. When Charlemagne had reduced all the lands from the Ebro and

the Appenines to the Eider, and from the Atlantic Ocean to the Raab

and the Elbe, he repaired to Rome at the conclusion of the century. It

was here that, during the festival of Christmas, he was invested with

the crown of the Roman empire, in the church of St. Peter, by Leo III,

whom he had defended against a mob of insurgents. It was hoped, that

by this means, western Christendom might be formed into a single body,

of which the Pope was to become the spiritual, and Charles the secular

head. It was at this time that the long-existing variance between the

Western (Roman Catholic), and the Eastern (Greek Catholic) churches,

terminated in a complete separation.

The domestic policy of Charlemagne was not less fertile of results

than the foreign. 1. He improved the government and the administration

of justice by abolishing the office of duke, dividing the whole

kingdom into provinces, and appointing counts and deputies for the

conduct of the affairs of justice, and clerks of the treasury for the

management of the crown lands and the collection of imposts. The laws

were confirmed by the popular assemblies (maifelder), in which every

freeman had a share. 2. He promoted the cultivation of the land, and

the education of the people. Agriculture and the breeding of cattle

were encouraged, farms and villages sprang up, and barren heaths were

converted into arable fields.

He founded conventual schools and cathedrals, had the works of the

ancient Roman writers transcribed, and formed a collection of old

German heroic ballads. Learned men, like the British monk, Alcuin, and

the historian Eginhard, from the Odenwald, had ample reason to

congratulate themselves on his encouragement and support. 3. He

favored the clergy and the church. It was by his means that the former

obtained their tithes and vast gifts and legacies; church music was

improved, missionaries supported, and churches and monasteries

erected. Ingelheim on the Rhine, and Aix, were his favorite places of

residence. He lies buried in the latter town.

The son of Charlemagne, Louis the Denbonnaire (the Gentle), was better

fitted for the repose of a cloister than for the government of a

warlike nation. A too hasty division of his kingdom among his three

sons, Lothaire, Pepin, and Louis, was the occasion of much sorrow to

himself, and confusion to the empire. For when, at a later period, he

proposed an alteration in favor of his fourth son, Charles the Bald,

the fruit of a second marriage, the elder sons took up arms against

their father. Louis, faithlessly deserted by his vassals on “the field

of lies,” near Strasburg, and betrayed to his own sons, was compelled

by Lothaire to do penance in the church and to abdicate his throne;

and was afterwards shut up for some time in a cloister. It is true

that Louis procured his father’s reinstatement; but when the weak

emperor, after the death of Pepin, by a new division of the kingdom,

deprived Louis of Germany, in favor of his brothers, Lothaire and

Charles, Louis raised his standard against him. This broke the old

emperor’s heart. Full of sorrow, he ended his days on a small island

of the Rhine, near Ingelheim. The hostile brothers now turned their

arms against each other. A bloody civil war depopulated the country,

so that at last, after a battle of three days’ duration, at

Fontenaille in Burgundy, the Frank nobility refused to obey the

_arriere-ban_, and by this means brought about the treaty of partition

of Verdun. By virtue of this treaty, Lothaire received the imperial

dignity, together with Italy, Burgundy, and Lorraine; Charles the

Bald, western Franconia (France); and Louis the German, the lands on

the right bank of the Rhine――Spire, Worms, and Mayence.

This division was followed by a time of great confusion, during which

Europe was severely harassed, on the south by the Arabs; on the east,

by the Slavi; and on the north and west, by the Normans. To oppose

these predatory inroads, the Carlovingian monarchs, who were all men

of weak and narrow minds, were obliged to restore the ducal office in

the different provinces, and to sanction the hereditary authority of

the Margraves, so that, in a short time, all the power fell into the

hands of the nobles. By the rapid deaths of most of the posterity of

Louis the Denbonnaire, nearly the whole of the empire of Charlemagne

devolved upon Charles the Fat, A. D. 876, a prince weak and indolent,

and simple almost to imbecility. Incapable of resisting the valiant

Normans, he purchased a disgraceful peace from them. This proceeding

so exasperated the German princes, that they decreed his deposition,

at Tribur on the Rhine, and elected his nephew, the brave Arnulf, as

his successor. Arnulf governed with vigor. He overthrew the Normans at

Louvain, and called in the aid of the wild Magyars, or Hungarians,

from the Ural, a people expert in horsemanship and archery, and who

were now, under their valiant captain Arpad, occupying the plains on

the Danube (named after them Hungary), against the Slavi and Avars.

The Avars were either subjected or compelled to retreat. But the

strangers (the Hungarians) soon became a more dreadful scourge to

Germany than either the Slavi or the Avars. They made their predatory

inroads and exacted a yearly tribute, even under Louis the Child, the

youthful son of Arnulf, who died in the flower of his age, after a

glorious campaign in Italy. This still continued, when, after the

early death of this last of the Carlovingian race, the German nobles,

among whom the dukes of Saxony, Franconia, Lorraine, Swabia, and

Bavaria were preëminent for power, met together and elected Duke

Conrad of Franconia, emperor. Germany thus became an elective empire.

The rule of the Carlovingians survived longest in France, but it

possessed neither strength nor dignity. Under Charles the Simple, who

had ascended the French throne after the deposition and subsequent

death of Charles the Fat, the dukes and counts rendered themselves

entirely independent, and one of the most powerful among them, Hugh of

Paris, kept the imbecile king in strict confinement. France, on the

other hand, was delivered from the devastating forays of the Normans,

by Charles admitting duke Rollo into the province named after them

Normandy, on condition that he and his followers would suffer

themselves to be baptized, and recognize the king as their suzerain

(feudal sovereign). The Normans, a people readily susceptible of

civilization, soon acquired the language, manners, and customs of the

Franks. Charles the Simple was followed by two other kings of the

Carlovingian race; but their power was at last so limited that they

possessed nothing but the town of Laon, with the surrounding country;

every thing else had fallen into the hands of the insolent nobility.

After the death of the Childless Louis V, Hugh Capet, son and heir of

Hugh of Paris, assumed the title of king, and put to death in prison

Louis’ uncle Charles of Lorraine, who attempted to assert his right to

the throne by force of arms.

The first successors of Hugh Capet possessed but little power and a

narrow territory. The dukes and counts of the different provinces

looked upon the king, who, properly, was only lord of France, as their

equal, and only allowed him the first rank among themselves, in so far

as they were obliged to recognize him as their feudal superior. The

nobles dared not weaken the rights that appertained to him in this

capacity, lest they should afford an example of breach of faith to

their own subjects, and encourage them to similar behavior towards

themselves. For the rest, the possessions of the great vassals were

independent counties and principalities, which had no closer

connection with the French throne than the western territories on the

Seine, Loire, and Garonne, which belonged to the king of England; or

the eastern (Burgundian) lands on the Rhone and the Jura, which were

portions of the German empire.

But in the attempt to increase the kingly power, the house of Capet

were not less aided by their good fortune than by their wisdom. It was

fortunate, that, owing to the lengthened lives of most of their kings,

the throne was seldom vacant, that there was almost always a son of

age to succeed his father, and that, consequently, there was never an

interregnum. But it was wisdom in the first kings to have their eldest

sons crowned during their lives, and to make them their partners in

the government, so that, on the death of the father, little or no

change was suffered. The most important kings after Hugh Capet were

Louis VII, who undertook the second crusade, and during his absence

intrusted the government in France to the politic Abbot Suger of St.

Denis; Philip Augustus II, who wrested Normandy and the other

territories in the west from the English king, John Lackland; and

Louis VIII, who enlarged his dominions on the south by the war against

the Albigenses. But the reigns which had the greatest influence upon

the history of France were those of St. Louis and Philip the Fair. The

former improved the laws, and caused the royal courts of justice to be

looked upon as the highest in the land, and the disputes of the nobles

among themselves, or with their vassals to be brought before them for

decision: the latter, on the other hand, increased the consequence of

the towns by granting various privileges and liberties to the

citizens, and by being the first who summoned the representatives of

the towns to the diet during his contest with the pope. After the

death of Philip’s three sons, who reigned one after the other, but

left no male heirs, the French throne passed to the house of Valois,

A. D. 1328.

Philip VI of Valois, brother’s son of Philip the Fair, inherited the

French throne. But Edward III of England also asserted his claims, as

son of a daughter of Philip the Fair. Without regard to the Salic law,

which prohibited the succession of females, he assumed the title of

king of France, and made war upon Philip. After a bloody contest of a

few years, the battle of Crecy was fought, in which the English were

the victors, and the flower of the French chivalry, together with

John, the blind king of Bohemia, fell on the field. The possession of

the important town of Calais was the fruit of the victory. Philip died

in the following year, and his son, John the Good, succeeded to the

contested crown. Eager to obliterate the memory of Crecy, he attacked

the English army, which was under the command of Edward III’s heroic

son, the Black Prince, but suffered a decisive defeat at Poictiers,

and was obliged to proceed as a captive to the capital of England.

Whilst he was absent, the kingdom was governed by the crown prince

(Dauphin). During his rule, an insurrection broke out in Paris and

over the whole land, which was attended with great devastations and

outrages, until the imperfectly-armed citizens and peasants were

subdued by the French knights, and visited with severe punishment.

Shortly after this, a peace was established between France and

England, by which Calais and the south-west of France was surrendered

to the English, and a heavy ransom promised for John, whilst Edward,

on the other hand, renounced his pretensions to the French throne. But

when the collection of the ransom money was delayed, John voluntarily

returned into captivity, and died in London.

John’s son, Charles V (the Wise), healed the wounds of his country. He

quieted men’s minds by his moderate government, and by prudence and

valor recovered the lands that had been lost on the Loire and the

Garonne; so that when the Black Prince fell a victim to wasting

disease, and Edward III shortly followed him into the grave, nothing

remained to the English of all their conquests but Calais. But under

his successor, Charles VI, who became insane shortly after coming of

age, France again fell into a state of confusion and lawlessness. Two

powerful court parties, headed by the uncle of the king (the duke of

Burgundy), and the king’s brother (the duke of Orleans), contended for

the government; whilst the burghers rebelled against the heavy

imposts, and demanded an increase of their privileges. About the same

time in which the towns were waging war against the knights in

Germany, the Swiss peasants were contending against the nobility, and

a dangerous popular insurrection, under Wat Tyler and others, was

making rapid progress in England, the citizen and peasant class rose

against the court and the nobility in Flanders and France also. But

want of union among the insurgents gave the latter the victory, and

the outbreak was followed by a diminution of the privileges of the

people. The Burgundian party favored the citizens, the Orleans party

the nobility.

The chivalrous king, Henry V of England, took advantage of these

circumstances to renew the war with France. He demanded the former

possessions back again; and when this was refused, he entered France

by Calais, and renewed at Agincourt, on the Somme, the days of Crecy

and Poictiers, A. D. 1415. The French army, four times the number of

its opponents, was overthrown, and the flower of the French chivalry

either fell in the field, or were taken prisoners by the enemy;

nothing stood between the victor and Paris, where party violence had

just now attained its highest point, and murders and insurrections

were matters of daily occurrence. The Orleans party joined the

Dauphin, whilst the Burgundian party, with the queen Isabella, united

themselves with the English, and acknowledged Henry V and his

descendants as the heirs of the French crown. The whole of the country

to the north of the Loire was soon in the hands of the English. But

Henry V was snatched away by death in the midst of his heroic course,

in the same year in which the crazy Charles VI sank into the grave,

and the Dauphin took possession of the throne under the title of

Charles VII. But this made little difference to France. The English

and their allies proclaimed Henry VI, who was scarcely a year old, the

rightful ruler of the country, and retained their superiority in the

field so that they already held Orleans in siege.

In this necessity, the MAID OF ORLEANS, a peasant girl of Dom Remy in

Lorraine, who gave out that she had been summoned to the redemption of

France by a heavenly vision, aroused the sinking courage of Charles

and his soldiers. Under her banner, the town of Orleans was delivered,

the king conducted to Rheims to be crowned, and the greater part of

their conquests wrested from the English. The faith in her heavenly

mission inspired the French with courage and self-confidence, and

filled the English with fear and despair. This effect remained after

Joan of Arc had fallen into the hands of the latter, and had been

given up to the flames on a pretended charge of blasphemy and sorcery.

The English lost one province after another; and when Philip the Good

of Burgundy reconciled himself with the king, Calais soon became their

last and only possession in the land of France. Paris opened its gates

and received Charles with acclamations. He reigned over France in

peace for twenty-five years; but he was a weak man, who suffered

himself to be guided by women and favorites. He was followed by Louis

XI, a crafty but politic prince, who, by cunning, violence, and

unexampled tyranny, rendered the power of the throne absolute, and

enlarged and consolidated his empire. He robbed the nobility of all

their choicest privileges, and gradually united all the great fiefs

with the crown. He then, by the assistance of the Swiss (whose hardy

youth he and his successor engaged as mercenaries), overthrew Charles

the Bold, and made himself master of the dukedom of Burgundy. The

stings of conscience and the fear of men tortured him in the lonely

castles where he spent the last years of his life, A. D. 1483. His two

successors, Charles VIII and Louis XII, conquered Brittany, but

dissipated the strength of the kingdon in their expeditions to Italy.

The American Encyclopedia of History, Biography and Travel Comprising Ancient and Modern History: the Biography of Eminent Men of Europe and America, and the Lives of Distinguished Travelers. · 第 134 / 251 题