THE TURKS――FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE.

We have already seen the weakness of the empire of Constantinople at

the time of the Crusades; we have seen the city sacked and the

government seized by the champions of the cross. The Greeks regained

their empire in the year 1261, but in a mangled and impoverished

condition. For nearly two centuries it continued in a similar state.

Andronicus, son of Michael Palæologus, who had restored the Greek

empire, allowed himself to be persuaded that as God was his protector,

all military force was unnecessary; and the superstitious Greeks,

regardless of danger, employed themselves in disputing about the

transfiguration of Jesus Christ, when their unfortunate situation made

it necessary that they should have been studying the art of war, and

training themselves to military discipline.

In the meantime, the Turks had become a powerful people. They had

embraced the Mohammedan religion long before the time of the Crusades,

and proved powerful obstacles to the success of those expeditions.

About the beginning of the fourteenth century they established an

empire of their own in Asia Minor, under Othman or Ottoman, and to

this day the Ottoman Empire is a name given to the dominions of their

descendants. By degrees they encroached on the borders of the empire

of Constantinople, and they were only prevented from subverting it at

a much earlier period than they did, by being called upon to defend

themselves from the arms of an Eastern conqueror who arose at this

time. Tamerlane, otherwise called Timerbek, was a prince of the Usbek

Tartars, and a descendant from Ghenghis Khan. After having overrun

Persia, and a great part of India and Syria, this great conqueror was

invited by some of the minor princes of Asia, who were suffering under

the Ottoman tyranny, to come and protect them. Tamerlane was flattered

by the request, and having brought a great army into Phrygia, he was

there met by Bajazet, the Ottoman emperor, who readily gave battle,

but was defeated and made prisoner (1402). Tamerlane made Samarcand

the capital of his empire, and there received the homage of all the

princes of the East. Illiterate himself, he was solicitous for the

cultivation of literature and science in his dominions; and Samarcand

became for a while the seat of learning, politeness, and the arts, but

was destined to relapse after a short period into its ancient

barbarism. The Turks, after the death of Tamerlane, resumed their

purpose of destroying the empire of the East. The honor, or disgrace,

as it may be thought, of effecting this, fell to the lot of Mohammed

II, commonly surnamed the Great. At the early age of twenty-one,

Mohammed projected this conquest. His countrymen had already passed

into Europe; they had possessed themselves of the city of Adrianople,

and indeed had left nothing of all the empire of the East to the

Greeks but the city of Constantinople itself. The preparations made

for defense were not such as became the descendants of Romans, and the

powers of Europe now looked upon the East with the most supine

indifference. The Turks assailed the city both on the land side and on

that of the sea; and battering down its walls with their cannon,

entered sword in hand, and massacred all who opposed them (1453).

Mohammed, like many other ambitious conquerors, showed himself

unwilling to destroy unnecessarily. The imperial edifices were

preserved, and the churches were converted into mosques; the exercise

of their religion was freely allowed to the Christians, and this

privilege they have never been deprived of. Constantine (for that was

the name of the last, as well as the first emperor of the East) was

slain in battle. From the time that it was founded by Constantine the

Great, the city had subsisted 1123 years. Mohammed liberally

patronized the arts and sciences. He was himself not only a

politician, but a scholar, and he invited both artists and men of

letters to his capital from the kingdoms of Europe. But the taking of

Constantinople had an effect contrary to his wishes: it dispersed the

learned Greeks, or Greeks who were _called_ learned, all over Europe;

and this, among other things, may be looked upon as a help to the

great revival of letters which the fifteenth century witnessed. The

taking of Constantinople was followed by the conquest of Greece and

Epirus; and Italy might probably have met with a similar fate, but for

the fleet of the Venetians, who opposed the arms of Mohammed with

considerable success, and even attacked him in Geece; but the

contending powers soon after put an end to hostilities by a treaty. By

this time Europe was trembling at Mohammed’s success, and was afraid,

not without reason, that he might pursue his conquests westward. It

was relieved from fear by his death, which took place in 1481. His

descendants have continued to our own day to occupy one of the finest

countries in Europe; and it was only in the present age that Greece

was liberated from their dominion.

The American Encyclopedia of History, Biography and Travel Comprising Ancient and Modern History: the Biography of Eminent Men of Europe and America, and the Lives of Distinguished Travelers. · 第 66 / 251 题