THE TRIUMVIRATE――CÆSAR’S GALLIC WARS――WAR BETWEEN CÆSAR AND POMPEY.

When Pompey returned to Rome (B. C. 61), he found the senatorial party

predominant, and Cicero incessantly talking about the Catilinarian

conspiracy, and how he had crushed it. Pompey enjoyed a triumph more

splendid than any conquering general had received before him; and the

sums which he added to the public treasury were enormous; yet he could

not procure from the senate that general ratification of his measures

in Asia to which he thought himself entitled. Cato and other senators

insisted on a full investigation of his measures one by one, ere the

sanction which he required should be granted. This conduct on the part

of the senators brought Pompey into closer connection with Cæsar; and

these two eminent men, finding that they agreed in many of their

views, and that at least they were one in their opposition to the

senate, resolved to unite their forces so as to work for their common

ends with double strength. For various reasons, it was found desirable

to admit Crassus to this political partnership; and accordingly, in

the year B. C. 60, was formed that famous coalition for mutual support

between Pompey, Crassus, and Cæsar, which is known in Roman history by

the name of the ‘First Triumvirate.’ Elected to the consulship of the

year B. C. 59, Cæsar infused new life into Roman politics, proposing

measures of so liberal a nature, and persevering in them with such

obstinacy, that the senate became almost frantic, and his colleague

Bibulus shut himself up in his house for eight months in disgust.

Among these measures was a ratification of Pompey’s proceedings in

Asia, and an agrarian law for providing lands for Pompey’s disbanded

soldiers and a number of destitute citizens. In the same year Cæsar

gave his daughter Julia in marriage to Pompey, who had already been

married twice. On retiring from the consulship, he obtained, by an

unusual stretch of generosity on the part of the grateful people and

the intimidated senate, the supreme command for five years over the

two Gauls (Cisalpine and Transalpine) and Illyricum. This was probably

the great object of Cæsar’s desires; at all events, it was the best

possible thing which could have happened for him and the republic.

Master of Gaul, and with an army devoted to his will, he could there

mature his power silently and undisturbed, and qualify himself for

entering, at the proper period, upon the career for which he was

destined, and rescuing, by military force, the ill-governed Empire out

of the hands of contending factions.

The condition of affairs in Rome during Cæsar’s absence in Gaul was

indeed such as to prove the necessity of some radical change in the

system of the Commonwealth. All was confusion and violence. Clodius, a

profligate relic of the Catilinarian party, having been elected to the

tribuneship B. C. 58, procured the banishment of Cicero for his

conduct in the affair of the conspiracy. In the following year,

however, Clodius having in the meantime made himself generally odious,

Cicero was recalled. Pompey and Crassus were elected consuls for the

year B. C. 55. Mindful of their connection with Cæsar, who was of

course in constant correspondence with them, they procured a

prolongation of his command over the Gauls for a second period of five

years; at the same time obtaining for themselves――Pompey, the

government of Spain for five years; and Crassus that of Syria and

adjacent countries for a similar period. In B. C. 55, Crassus set out

for the scene of his command, where, soon afterwards, he perished in a

fruitless expedition against the Parthians; Pompey remained at home,

governing Spain by deputies. During several subsequent years, Rome was

in a state of anarchy and misrule――the streets perambulated by armed

mobs, partisans on the one hand of Clodius, and on the other of a

powerful citizen called Milo, between whom a feud was carried on, as

desperate and bloody as any that ever distracted a European town in

the middle ages. In one of the numerous scuffles which took place

between the contending parties, Clodius was killed; and taking

advantage of the opportunity, the tottering government asserted its

rights by bringing Milo to trial, and procuring his banishment.

Meanwhile the remedy was preparing. Among the marshes and forests of

Gaul, the great Cæsar was accumulating that strength of men and

purpose with which he was to descend on Italy and shiver the rotton

fabric of the Commonwealth. ‘Fain,’ says the eloquent Michelet――‘fain

would I have seen that fair and pale countenance, prematurely aged by

the debaucheries of the capital――fain would I have seen that delicate

and epileptic man, marching in the rains of Gaul at the head of his

legions, and swimming across our rivers, or else on horseback, between

the litters in which his secretaries were carried, dictating even six

letters at a time, shaking Rome from the extremity of Belgium,

sweeping from his path two millions of men, and subduing in ten years

Gaul, the Rhine, and the ocean of the north. This barbarous and

bellicose chaos of Gaul was a superb material for such a genius. The

Gallic tribes were on every side calling in the stranger; Druidism was

in its decline; Italy was exhausted; Spain untameable; Gaul was

essential to the subjugation of the world.’ Cæsar’s Gallic wars of

themselves form a history. We have an account of them yet remaining

from the pen of the conqueror himself, and that of his friend Hirtius.

Suffice it to say, that in eight years (B. C. 58-50) Cæsar had

conquered all Gaul, including the present France and Belgium; had paid

two visits to the island of Great Britain (B. C. 55-54); and was able,

in the spring of B. C. 50, to take up his residence in Cisalpine Gaul,

leaving the 300 tribes beyond the Alps, which he had conquered by such

bloody means, not only pacified, but even attached to himself

personally. His army, which included many Gauls and Germans, were so

devoted to him, that they would have marched to the end of the world

in his service.

Cæsar’s conquests in Gaul were of course a subject of engrossing

interest at Rome, and when the city enjoyed an interval of repose from

the commotions caused by Clodius and Milo, nothing else was talked of.

‘Compared with this man,’ said Cicero, ‘what was Marius?’ and the

saying was but an expression of the popular enthusiasm. Cæsar’s visits

to Britain excited especial interest; and at first there were not

wanting sceptics who maintained that there was no such island in

existence, and that the alleged visit of Cæsar to that place of

savages, where pearls were found in the rivers, was a mere hoax on the

public. As, however, the period of Cæsar’s command drew near its

close, and it became known that he aspired to a second consulship, the

fears of the aristocratic party began to manifest themselves. ‘What

may not this conqueror of Gaul do when he returns to Rome?’ was the

saying of Cato, and others of the senators. ‘Accustomed during so many

years to the large and roomy action of a camp, will he be able to

submit again to civic trammels? Will he not rather treat us as if we

were his subordinate officers――Roman laws as if they were savage

customs――and our city itself as if it were a Gallic forest?’

Unfortunately, also, the Triumvirate no longer existed to support

Cæsar’s interests. Crassus was dead; and Pompey――whose connection with

Cæsar had been severed by the death of his wife, Cæsar’s beloved

daughter Julia (B. C. 54)――had since gone over to the aristocratic

party, to which he had formerly belonged, and whose policy was, upon

the whole, more genial to his character. In B. C. 52, he enjoyed a

third consulship, without a colleague, having been appointed by the

senators as the man most likely to restore order to the distracted

state; and during the following year, he lent his aid to those enemies

of Cæsar who insisted that, ere he should be allowed to stand for the

consulship, he should be obliged to resign his Gallic command, and

resume his station as a private citizen, ready to meet any charges

which might be brought against him. Cæsar did not want agents in

Rome――some of them paid, some of them voluntary――to plead his cause;

and through these he offered to resign his command, provided Pompey

would do the same with regard to Spain. The proposal was not listened

to; and a decree of the senate having been passed that Cæsar should

disband his army against a certain day, under pain of being treated as

a public enemy, his agents left the city, and hastened to his camp in

Cisalpine Gaul (B. C. 50).

Cæsar did not delay a moment. Sending orders to his various legions

distributed through Gaul to follow him as speedily as possible, he

placed himself at the head of such forces as were with him at the

instant, crossed the small stream called the Rubicon, which separated

his province of Cisalpine Gaul from Italy, and advanced towards Rome,

amid cheers of welcome from the populations which he passed through.

Utterly bewildered by his unexpected arrival, the whole senatorial

party, with Pompey at their head, abandoned Rome, and proceeded into

the south of Italy, where they tried to raise forces. Cæsar pursued

them, and drove them into Greece. Then hastening into Spain, he

suppressed a rising Pompeian movement in that country. Returning to

Rome with the title of Dictator, which had been bestowed on him during

his absence, he passed various salutary measures for restoring order

in Italy, and among them one conferring the Roman citizenship on the

Cisalpine Gauls; then crossed over into Greece (B. C. 49) to give

battle to Pompey, who had meanwhile assembled forces from all parts of

the Roman dominion. At length the two armies met on the plain of

Pharsalia in Thessaly (9th August B. C. 48), when Pompey sustained a

complete defeat. Not long afterwards he was killed by the orders of

Ptolemy, king of Egypt, when seeking to land on the coast of that

country. Cæsar, who had used his victory with great moderation,

arrived in Egypt soon after, and remained there several months,

fascinated by Cleopatra, who was then at war with her brother Ptolemy.

Having settled the affairs of Egypt, Cæsar proceeded to Asia Minor,

crushed an insurrection there headed by Pharnaces, the son of

Mithridates, and then (September, B. C. 47) returned to Italy. He

remained there but a few months, setting out in the beginning of B. C.

46 for Africa, where the relics of the Pompeian party had taken

refuge. These were soon defeated; and Cato, the most distinguished man

among them, killed himself rather than to fall into his conqueror’s

hands. Pompey’s two sons escaped to Spain, where they excited an

insurrection, which, however, was soon suppressed.

EXTINCTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH――DICTATORSHIP AND DEATH OF CÆSAR――THE

SECOND TRIUMVIRATE――CIVIL WARS OF MARK ANTONY AND OCTAVIANUS.

From August B. C. 48, when he defeated Pompey at Pharsalia, till March

B. C. 44, when he was assassinated, Julius Cæsar was supreme master of

the Roman world. Senate and people vied with each other in conferring

dignities upon him; and all the great offices and titles recognized by

the Roman constitution――as consul, dictator, censor, tribune,

etc.――were concentrated in his person, while he exercised the virtual

patronage of almost all the rest. In short, the Commonwealth may be

said to have ceased when he defeated Pompey; and had he lived long

enough, there is no doubt that he would have fully established the

Empire. It was not so much, however, in organic changes of the

constitution, as in practical reforms of vast moment, that Cæsar

exercised the enormous power which had been placed in his hands.

Besides the various measures of reform which he actually carried into

effect during his dictatorship, among which his famous reform of the

Calendar deserves especial mention, there were innumerable schemes

which he had projected for himself, and some of which he would

probably have executed, had his life not been cut short. To extend the

Roman dominion in the East; to drain the Pontine marshes; to cut

through the Isthmus of Corinth; to prepare a complete map of the Roman

Empire; to draw up a new digest of Roman law; to establish public

libraries in the metropolis――such were a few of the designs which this

great man entertained at the time when the conspiracy was formed which

led to his assassination. At the head of this plot, which consisted of

about sixty persons of note, were Brutus and Cassius, both men of the

highest abilities, and esteemed by Cæsar; and the former at least

actuated by motives of the purest character. The immediate occasion of

the conspiracy was the rumor that Cæsar intended to accept the title

of king, which some of his adherents were pressing upon him. When the

plot was matured (B. C. 44) it was resolved that Cæsar should be

assassinated in the senate-house on the ides (the 15) of March, on

which day it was understood a motion was to be brought forward by some

of his friends for appointing him king of Italy. ‘Upon the first

onset,’ says Plutarch, ‘those who were not privy to the design were

astonished, and their horror of the action was so great, that they

durst not fly, nor assist Cæsar, nor so much as speak a word. But

those who came prepared for the business enclosed him on every side,

with their naked daggers in their hands, and which way soever he

turned he met with blows, and saw their swords leveled at his face and

eyes. Brutus gave him one stab in the groin. Some say that he fought

and resisted all the rest, and moved from one place to another calling

for help; but when he saw Brutus’s sword drawn, he covered his face

with his robe, and quietly surrendered himself, till he was pushed,

either by chance or design, to the pedestal on which Pompey’s statue

stood, which by that means was much stained with his blood: so that

Pompey himself may seem to have had his share in the revenge of his

former enemy, who fell at his feet, and breathed out his soul

through the multitude of his wounds; for they say he received

three-and-twenty.’

The assassination of Cæsar has justly been pronounced ‘the most stupid

action that ever the Romans committed.’ The later ages of the republic

had been one continued scene of violence and anarchy; and not until

Cæsar had risen to the chief power in the state was there a

restoration of order and efficient government. His assassination

plunged the Roman dominions into new and complicated civil wars. On

the one side were the conspirators with Brutus and Cassius at their

head, bent on the futile project of throwing back the Empire into the

condition of a republic. On the other were Mark Antony, an able and

valiant officer of Cæsar’s; Lepidus, another officer of less

distinguished abilities; and Marcus Octavius, a young man of eighteen,

Cæsar’s grandnephew, and who, as his uncle’s heir, now assumed the

name of Caius Julius Cæsar Octavianus. These three united themselves

into a triumvirate (November B. C. 44) for avenging Cæsar’s death, and

settling the affairs of the republic. After making themselves masters

of Italy, and putting to death by wholesale proscription all those

citizens whose views they suspected, among others the great and

amiable Cicero, they pursued the conspirators into Greece. At length,

in the autumn of B. C. 42, two great battles were fought at Philippi

in Macedonia between the republican forces and those of the

triumvirate. The former were defeated; Cassius caused himself to be

slain, Brutus committed suicide, and the triumvirs thus remained

masters of the Roman world. They divided it among them: Antony

assuming the government of the East, Lepidus obtaining Africa, and

Octavianus returning to Italy, master of the countries adjacent to

that peninsula. Each continued to govern his share for some time

independently; but a quarrel ensuing between Octavianus and Lepidus,

the latter was deprived of his power, and obliged to retire into

private life. The Empire was now divided between Antony and

Octavianus, the former master of the East, the latter of the West. At

length, however, political and private reasons led to a rupture

between the two potentates (B. C. 33). The rash and pleasure-loving

Antony, who had been caught in the toils of Cleopatra, the licentious

queen of Egypt, and therefore one of his subject sovereigns as master

of the East, was no match for the cunning, abstemious, and remorseless

Octavianus. Defeated at the battle of Actium (2d September B. C. 31),

he fled with Cleopatra to Egypt, where, being hard pressed by

Octavianus, they both died by their own hands. Octavianus thus

remained sole master (B. C. 30) of the great Empire which Julius Cæsar

had prepared for him; and under the new name of Augustus, he continued

to wield the sovereignty during the long period of forty-four years

(B. C. 30-A. D. 14). During these forty-four years, the various races

and nations which so many centuries of conquest had connected

together, became consolidated into that historic entity――‘The Roman

Empire.’

The American Encyclopedia of History, Biography and Travel Comprising Ancient and Modern History: the Biography of Eminent Men of Europe and America, and the Lives of Distinguished Travelers. · 第 52 / 251 题