DECLINE OF ATHENIAN INDEPENDENCE.

With Alcibiades perished the last of the great men who possessed the

power to sway the wild democracy, or, properly speaking, the mob of

Athens. From the period of his death till the subjugation of the

country, the Athenian people were at the mercy of contending factions,

and without a single settled principle of government. During this

brief period of their history, in which a kind of popular democracy

had attained the command of affairs, happened the trial and

condemnation of Socrates, an eminent teacher of morals, and a man

guiltless of every offense but that of disgracing, by his illustrious

merit, the vices and follies of his cotemporaries. On the false charge

of corrupting the morals of the pupils who listened to his admirable

expositions, and of denying the religion of his country, he was, to

the eternal disgrace of the Athenians, compelled to die by drinking

poison, a fate which he submitted to with a magnanimity which has

rendered his name for ever celebrated. This odious transaction

occurred in the year 400 B. C.

After the death of this great man, the political independence of

Athens drew to its termination――a circumstance which cannot excite the

least surprise, when we reflect on the turbulence of its citizens,

their persecution of virtue and talent, and their unhappy distrust of

any settled form of government. Their ruin was finally accomplished by

their uncontrollable thirst for war, and can create no emotions of

pity or regret in the reader of their distracted history. The

Lacedæmonians, under the command of an able officer named Lysander,

attacked and totally destroyed the Athenian fleet. By this means

having obtained the undisputed command of the sea, Lysander easily

reduced those cities on the coasts of Thrace and Asia Minor, and those

islands of the Ægean, which still acknowledged the supremacy of

Athens. Having thus stripped that once lordly state of all its

dependencies, he proceeded to blockade the city of Athens itself. The

Athenians made a heroic defense; but after a lengthened siege, during

which they suffered all the horrors of famine, they were obliged to

surrender on such conditions as their enemies thought fit to impose

(404 B. C.). The Spartans demanded that the fortifications of Piræus,

and the long walls which connected it with the city, should be

demolished; that the Athenians should relinquish all pretensions to

authority over their former tributaries, recall the exiled partisans

of the 400 tyrants, acknowledge the supremacy of Sparta, and follow

its commanders in time of war; and finally, that they should adopt

such a political constitution as should meet the approbation of the

Lacedæmonians.

Thus sank the power of Athens, which had so long been the leading

state of Greece, and thus terminated the Peloponnesian war, in which

the Grecian communities had been so long engaged, to little other

purpose than to waste the strength, and exhaust the resources, of

their common country.

CONDITION OF ATHENS. During the age preceding its fall, Athens, as

already mentioned, had been greatly beautified and enlarged by

Pericles. At the same time, the comparative simplicity of manners

which formerly prevailed was exchanged for luxurious habits. This

alteration has been thus described by Gillies in his ‘History of

Ancient Greece:’――‘In the course of a few years, the success of

Aristides, Cimon, and Pericles, had tripled the revenues, and

increased in a far greater proportion the dominions of the republic.

The Athenian galleys commanded the eastern coasts of the

Mediterranean; their merchantmen had engrossed the traffic of the

adjacent countries; the magazines of Athens abounded with wood, metal,

ebony, ivory, and all the materials of the useful as well as of the

agreeable arts; they imported the luxuries of Italy, Sicily, Cyprus,

Lydia, Pontus, and Peloponnesus; experience had improved their skill

in working the silver mines of Mount Laurium; they had lately opened

the valuable marble veins in Mount Pentelicus; the honey of Hymettus

became important in domestic use and foreign traffic; the culture of

their olives (oil being long their staple commodity, and the only

production of Attica which Solon allowed them to export) must have

improved with the general improvement of the country in arts and

agriculture, especially under the active administration of Pericles,

who liberally let loose the public treasure to encourage every species

of industry.

‘But if that minister promoted the love of action, he found it

necessary at least to comply with, if not to excite, the extreme

passion for pleasure which then began to distinguish his countrymen.

The people of Athens, successful in every enterprise against their

foreign as well as domestic enemies, seemed entitled to reap the

fruits of their dangers and victories. For the space of at least

twelve years preceding the war of Peloponnesus, their city afforded a

perpetual scene of triumph and festivity. Dramatic entertainments, to

which they were passionately addicted, were no longer performed in

slight, unadorned edifices, but in stone or marble theatres, erected

at great expense, and embellished with the most precious productions

of nature and of art. The treasury was opened, not only to supply the

decorations of this favorite amusement, but to enable the poorer

citizens to enjoy it, without incurring any private expense; and thus,

at the cost of the state, or rather of its tributary allies and

colonies, to feast and delight their ears and fancy with the combined

charms of music and poetry. The pleasure of the eye was peculiarly

consulted and gratified in the architecture of theatres and other

ornamental buildings; for as Themistocles had strengthened, Pericles

adorned, his native city; and unless the concurring testimony of

antiquity was illustrated in the Parthenon, or Temple of Minerva, and

other existing remains worthy to be immortal, it would be difficult to

believe that in the space of a few years there could have been created

those numerous, yet inestimable wonders of art, those temples,

theatres, statues, altars, baths, gymnasia, and porticoes, which, in

the language of ancient panegyric, rendered Athens the eye and light

of Greece.

‘Pericles was blamed for thus decking one favorite city, like a vain

voluptuous harlot, at the expense of plundered provinces; but it would

have been fortunate for the Athenians if their extorted wealth had not

been employed in more perishing, as well as more criminal, luxury. The

pomp of religious solemnities, which were twice as numerous and costly

in Athens as in any other city of Greece――the extravagance of

entertainments and banquets, which on such occasions always followed

the sacrifices――exhausted the resources, without augmenting the glory,

of the republic. Instead of the bread, herbs, and simple fare

recommended by the laws of Solon, the Athenians, soon after the

eightieth Olympiad, availed themselves of their extensive commerce to

import the delicacies of distant countries, which were prepared with

all the refinements of cookery. The wines of Cyprus were cooled with

snow in summer; in winter, the most delightful flowers adorned the

tables and persons of the wealthy Athenians. Nor was it sufficient to

be crowned with roses, unless they were likewise anointed with the

most precious perfumes. Parasites, dancers, and buffoons, were a usual

appendage of every entertainment. Among the weaker sex, the passion

for delicate birds, distinguished by their voice or plumage, was

carried to such excess, as merited the name of madness. The bodies of

such youths as were not peculiarly addicted to hunting and horses,

which began to be a prevailing taste, were corrupted by a lewd style

of living; while their minds were still more polluted by the

licentious philosophy of the sophists. It is unnecessary to crowd the

picture, since it may be observed, in one word, that the vices and

extravagances which are supposed to characterize the declining ages of

Greece and Rome, took root in Athens during the administration of

Pericles, the most splendid and most prosperous in the Grecian

annals.’

During this period flourished Æschylus and Sophocles, Euripides and

Aristophanes, dramatists; Pindar, a lyrical poet; Herodotus and

Thucydides, historians; Xenophanes, Heraclitus, Empedocles,

Anaxagoras, and Socrates, philosophers (reasoners upon the nature of

the human mind, and upon man’s immortal destiny). In this period also,

under the administration of Pericles (from 458 to 429 B. C.),

sculpture and architecture attained their perfection. It was then that

Phidias executed those splendid works, statues of the gods and

goddesses, which excited the admiration of the world, and which

succeeding artists have in vain endeavored to rival. While Athens had

extended its power over a great part of the coasts of the Ægean Sea,

and increased its trade and commerce by every available means, it had

also become a city of palaces and temples, whose ruins continue to be

the admiration of ages for their grandeur and beauty. It is understood

that the Greeks had acquired their knowledge of architecture from the

Egyptians; but they greatly excelled them in the elegance of their

designs, and are in a great measure entitled to the character of

inventors in the art. The beauty of the Corinthian pillar, for

example, has never been excelled either in ancient or modern times.

After the surrender of Athens to the Spartans (404 B. C.), the

democratic constitution was abolished, and the government was

intrusted to thirty persons, whose rapacious, oppressive, and bloody

administration ere long procured them the title of the Thirty Tyrants.

The ascendancy of these intruders was not, however, of long duration.

Conon, assisted privately by the Persians, who were desirous of

humiliating the Spartans, expelled the enemy, and reëstablished the

independence of his country. About seventy years later a new source of

agitation throughout Greece was caused by the warlike projects of

Alexander, king of Macedon, usually styled.

ALEXANDER THE GREAT. This intrepid and ambitious soldier was the son

of Philip, king of Macedon, a small territory adjacent to the Grecian

states, from which it had originally received a knowledge of arts and

learning. Alexander was born in the year 356 B. C., and by his father

was committed to the charge of the philosopher Aristotle to be

educated; a duty which was faithfully fulfilled. By the assassination

of Philip, Alexander was called to the throne of Macedon while yet

only twenty years of age, and immediately had an opportunity of

displaying his great warlike abilities in conducting an expedition

into Greece, which was attended with signal success, and procured for

him the honor of succeeding his father as commander-in-chief of the

Grecian states. He now carried out a design which had been formed by

Philip, to subdue Persia and other countries in Asia. In the spring of

334 B. C., he crossed over to the Asiatic coast, with an army of

30,000 foot and 5000 horse, thus commencing the most important

military enterprise which is narrated in the pages of ancient history.

Alexander marched through Asia Minor, and in successive encounters

completely conquered the armies of Persia; but the whole history of

his progress is but an account of splendid victories. During a space

of about seven or eight years, he conquered Persia, Assyria, Egypt,

Babylonia, and, in fact, became master of nearly all the

half-civilized countries in Asia and Africa. It does not appear that

Alexander had any motive for this wide-spread overthrow of ancient and

remote sovereignties, excepting that of simple ambition, or desire of

conquest, with perhaps the indefinite idea of improving the social

condition of the countries which he overran. From various

circumstances in his career, it is apparent that he never contemplated

the acquisition of wealth or of praise, except such as could be shared

with his soldiers, for whom he displayed a most paternal affection.

The extraordinary career of Alexander was suddenly cut short by death.

At Babylon, while engaged in extensive plans for the future, he became

sick, and died in a few days, 323 B. C. Such was the end of this

conqueror, in his thirty-second year, after a reign of twelve years

and eight months. He left behind him an immense empire, which,

possessing no consolidated power, and only loosely united by conquest,

became the scene of continual wars. The generals of the Macedonian

army respectively seized upon different portions of the empire, each

trusting in his sword for an independent establishment. The greedy

struggle for power finally terminated in confirming Ptolemy in the

possession of Egypt; Seleucus in Upper Asia; Cassander in Macedon and

Greece; while several of the provinces in Lower Asia fell to the share

of Lysimachus.

The American Encyclopedia of History, Biography and Travel Comprising Ancient and Modern History: the Biography of Eminent Men of Europe and America, and the Lives of Distinguished Travelers. · 第 45 / 251 题