“I shall never--give notice, sir!” fluttered the white throat.

“Are you perfectly sure?” insisted the Senior Surgeon.

The pink in the White Linen Nurse’s profiled cheek deepened a little.

“Perfectly sure, sir,” declared the carmine lips.

Like the crack of a pistol, the Senior Surgeon snapped the ivory

paper-cutter in two.

“All right, then,” he said. “Rae Malgregor, look at me! Don’t take your

eyes from mine, I say! Rae Malgregor, if I should decide in my own

mind, here and now, that it was best for you, as well as for me, that

you should come away with me now for this week, not as my guest, as I

had planned, but as my wife, even if you were not quite ready for it in

your heart, even if you were not yet remotely ready for it, would you

come because I told you to come?”

Heavily under her white eyelids, heavily under her black lashes, the

girl’s eyes struggled up to meet his own.

“Yes, sir,” whispered the White Linen Nurse.

Abruptly the Senior Surgeon pushed back his chair from the desk and

stood up. The important decision once made, no further finessing of

words seemed either necessary or dignified to him.

“Go and pack your suitcase quickly, then,” he ordered. “I want to get

away from here within half an hour.”

But before the girl had half crossed the room he called to her

suddenly. And his face in that moment was as haggard as though a whole

lifetime’s struggle was packed into it.

“Rae Malgregor,” he drawled mockingly, “this thing shall be--barter

’way through to the end, with the credit always on your side of the

account. In exchange for the gift of yourself--your wonderful self,

and the trust that goes with it, I will give you,--God help me!--the

ugliest thing in my life. And God knows I have broken faith with myself

once or twice, but never have I broken my word to another. From now on,

in token of your trust in me, for whatever the bitter gift is worth to

you, as long as you stay with me, my Junes shall be yours, to do with

as you please.”

“_What_, sir?” gasped the White Linen Nurse. “_What_, sir?”

Softly, almost stealthily, she was half-way back across the room to

him, when she stopped suddenly and threw out her arms with a gesture of

appeal and defiance.

“All the same, sir,” she cried passionately--“all the same, sir,

the place is too hard for the small pay I get. Oh, I will do what I

promised,” she declared with increasing passion; “I will never leave

you; and I will mother your little girl; and I will servant your big

house; and I will go with you wherever you say! And I will be to you

whatever you wish; and I will never flinch from any hardship you impose

on me, nor whine over any pain, on and on and on, all my days, all my

years, till I drop in my tracks again, and die, as you say, ‘still

smiling’: all the same,” she reiterated wildly, “the place is too hard!

It always was too hard, it always will be too hard, for such small pay!”

“For such small pay?” gasped the Senior Surgeon.

About his heart a horrid, clammy chill began to settle. Sickeningly

through his brain a dozen recent financial transactions began to

rehearse themselves.

“You mean, Miss Malgregor,” he said a bit brokenly--“you mean that I

haven’t been generous enough with you?”

“Yes, sir,” faltered the White Linen Nurse. All the storm and passion

died suddenly from her, leaving her just a frightened girl again,

flushing pink-white before the Senior Surgeon’s scathing stare. One

step, two steps, three, she advanced toward him. “Oh, I mean, sir,”

she whispered--“oh, I mean, sir, that I’m just an ordinary, ignorant

country girl, and you--are further above me than the moon from the sea!

I couldn’t expect you to--love me, sir, I couldn’t even dream of your

loving me; but I do think you might like me just a little bit with your

heart!”

“What?” cried the Senior Surgeon. “What?”

_Whacketty-bang_ against the window-pane sounded the Little Crippled

Girl’s knuckled fists. Darkly against the window-pane squashed the

Little Crippled Girl’s staring face.

“Father,” screamed the shrill voice. “Father, there’s a white lady

here, with two black ladies, washing the breakfast dishes! Is it Aunt

Agnes?”

With a totally unexpected laugh, with a totally unexpected desire to

laugh, the Senior Surgeon strode across the room and unlocked his door.

Even then his lips against the White Linen Nurse’s ear made just a

whisper, not a kiss.

“For God’s sake, hurry!” he said. “Let’s get out of here before any

telephone-message catches me!”

Then almost calmly he walked out on the piazza and greeted his

sister-in-law.

“Hello, Agnes!” he said.

“Hello, yourself!” smiled his sister-in-law.

“How’s everything?” he inquired politely.

“How’s everything with you?” parried his sister-in-law.

Idly for a few moments the Senior Surgeon threw out stray crumbs of

thought to feed the conversation, while smilingly all the while from

her luxuriant East Indian chair his sister-in-law sat studying the

general situation. The Senior Surgeon’s sister-in-law was always

studying something. Last year it was archæology; the year before,

basketry; this year it happened to be eugenics, or something funny like

that; next year, again, it might be book-binding.

“So you and your pink-and-white shepherdess are going off on a little

trip together?” she queried banteringly. “The girl’s a darling,

Lendicott. I haven’t had as much sport in a long time as I had that

afternoon last June when I came in my best calling clothes and helped

her paint the kitchen woodwork. And I had come prepared to be a bit

nasty, Lendicott. In all honesty, Lendicott, I might just as well ’fess

up that I had come prepared to be just a little bit nasty.”

“She seems to have a way,” smiled the Senior Surgeon--“she seems to

have a way of disarming people’s unpleasant intentions.”

A trifle quizzically for an instant the woman turned her face to the

Senior Surgeon’s. It was a worldly face, a cold-featured, absolutely

worldly face, with a surprisingly humorous mouth that warmed her nature

just about as cheerfully, and just about as effectually, as one open

fireplace warms a whole house. Nevertheless, one often achieved much

comfort by keeping close to “Aunt Agnes’s” humorous mouth, for Aunt

Agnes knew a thing or two, Aunt Agnes did, and the things that she made

a point of knowing were conscientiously amiable.

“Why, Lendicott Faber,” she rallied him now, “why, you’re as nervous as

a school-boy! Why, I believe--I believe that you’re going courting!”

More opportunely than any man could have dared to hope, the White

Linen Nurse appeared suddenly on the scene in her little blue serge

wedding-suit, with her traveling-case in her hand. With a gasp of

relief the Senior Surgeon took her case and his own and went on

down the path to his car and his chauffeur, leaving the two women

temporarily alone. When he returned to the piazza, the woman of the

world and the girl not at all of the world were bidding each other a

really affectionate good-by, and the woman’s face looked suddenly just

a little bit old, but the girl’s cheeks were most inordinately blooming.

In unmistakable friendliness his sister-in-law extended her hand to him.

“Good-by, Lendicott, old man!” she said, “and good luck to you!” A

little slyly out of her shrewd, gray eyes, she glanced up sidewise at

him. “You’ve got the devil’s own temper, Lendicott dear,” she teased,

“and two or three other vices probably, and if rumor speaks the truth,

you’ve run amuck more than once in your life; but there’s one thing I

will say for you, though it prove you a dear stupid: you never were

overquick to suspect that any woman could possibly be in love with you.”

“To what woman do you particularly refer?” mocked the Senior Surgeon,

impatiently.

Quite brazenly to her own heart, which never yet apparently had stirred

the laces that enshrined it, his sister-in-law pointed with persistent

banter.

“Maybe I refer to myself,” she laughed, “and maybe to the only other

lady present.”

“Oh!” gasped the White Linen Nurse.

“You do me much honor, Agnes,” bowed the Senior Surgeon. Quite

resolutely he held his gaze from following the White Linen Nurse’s

quickly averted face.

A little oddly for an instant the older woman’s glance hung on his.

“More honor perhaps than you think, Lendicott Faber,” she said, and

kept right on smiling.

“Eh?” jerked the Senior Surgeon. Restively he turned to the White Linen

Nurse.

Very flushingly on the steps the White Linen Nurse knelt arguing with

the Little Crippled Girl.

“Your father and I are going away,” she pleaded. “Won’t you please kiss

us good-by?”

“I’ve only got one kiss,” sulked the Little Crippled Girl.

“Give it to your father!” pleaded the White Linen Nurse.

Amazingly, all in a second, the ugliness vanished from the little face.

Dartlingly, like a bird, the child swooped down and planted one large,

round kiss on the astonished Senior Surgeon’s boot.

“Beautiful Father!” she cried. “I kiss your feet.”

Abruptly the Senior Surgeon plunged from the step and started down the

walk. His cheek-bones were quite crimson.

Two or three rods behind him the White Linen Nurse followed

falteringly. Once she stopped to pick up a tiny stick or a stone, and

once she dallied to straighten out a snarled spray of red and brown

woodbine.

Missing the sound or the shadow of her, the Senior Surgeon turned

suddenly to wait for her. So startled was she by his intentness, so

flustered, so affrighted, that just for an instant the Senior Surgeon

thought that she was going to wheel in her tracks and bolt madly back

to the house. Then quite unexpectedly she gave an odd, muffled little

cry, and ran swiftly to him, like a child, and slipped her bare hand

trustingly into his. And they went on together to the car.

With his foot already half lifted to the step, the Senior Surgeon

turned abruptly around, and lifted his hat, and stood staring back

bare-headed for some unexplainable reason at the two silent figures on

the piazza.

“Rae,” he said perplexedly--“Rae, I don’t seem to know just why, but

somehow I’d like to have you kiss your hand to Aunt Agnes.”

Obediently the White Linen Nurse withdrew her fingers from his and

wafted two kisses, one to “Aunt Agnes” and one to the Little Crippled

Girl.

Then the White Linen Nurse and the Senior Surgeon climbed up into the

tonneau of the car, where they had never, never sat alone before,

and the Senior Surgeon gave a curt order to his man, and the big car

started off again into interminable spaces.

Mutely, without a word, without a glance, passing between them, the

Senior Surgeon held out his hand to her once more, as though the

absence of her hand in his was suddenly a lonesomeness not to be

endured again while life lasted.

_Whizz, whizz, whizz, whir, whir, whir_, the ribbony road began to

roll up again on that hidden spool under the car.

When the chauffeur’s mind seemed sufficiently absorbed in speed and

sound, the Senior Surgeon bent down a little mockingly and mumbled his

lips inarticulately at the White Linen Nurse.

“See,” he laughed, “I’ve got a text, too, to keep my courage up. Of

course you _look_ like an angel,” he teased closer and closer to her

flaming face; “but all the time to myself, to reassure myself, I just

keep saying, ’Bah! she’s nothing but a woman, nothing but a woman,

nothing but a woman!’”

Within the Senior Surgeon’s warm, firm grasp the White Linen Nurse’s

calm hand quickened suddenly like a bud forced precipitously into full

bloom.

“Oh, don’t--talk, sir,” she whispered. “Oh, don’t talk, sir! Just

listen!”

“Listen? Listen to what?” laughed the Senior Surgeon.

From under the heavy lashes that shadowed the flaming cheeks the soul

of the girl who was to be his peered up at the soul of the man who was

to be hers, and saluted what she saw!

“Oh, my heart, sir!” whispered the White Linen Nurse. “Oh, my heart, my

heart, my _heart_.”

THE END

THE BEGGAR

BY JAMES W. FOLEY

Always beside me as I go my way

This beggar, Time, walks with his outstretched palms,

Demanding, not beseeching, of me alms--

Alms of the precious hours of my day.

So side by side we walk until my day

Is growing dusk, and Time’s purse of the years

Holds alms of mine, bright-jeweled with my tears,

Since I have given these treasured hours away.

Nor from his swollen purse will he give me

One hour, although with spendthrift song and gay

I flung him alms, nor ever said him nay.

A beggar and a miser both is he!

[Illustration]

IN “THE CIRCUIT OF THE SUMMER HILLS”

BY JOHN BURROUGHS

Author of “Wake Robin,” “Locusts and Wild Honey,” etc.

WITH A PORTRAIT

I

To sit on one’s rustic porch, or at the door of one’s tent, and see the

bees working on the catnip or motherwort or clover, to see the cattle

grazing leisurely in the fields or ruminating under the spreading

trees, or the woodchucks creeping about the meadows and pastures, or

the squirrels spinning along the fences, or the hawks describing great

spirals against the sky; to hear no sound but the voice of birds,

the caw of crows, the whistle of marmots, the chirp of crickets; to

smell no odors but the odors of grassy fields, or blooming meadows, or

falling rain; and amid it all, to lift one’s eyes to the flowing and

restful mountain lines--this is to get a taste of the peace and comfort

of the summer hills.

This boon is mine when I go to my little gray farm-house on a broad

hill-slope on the home farm in the Catskills. Especially is it mine

when, to get still nearer nature and beyond the orbit of household

sounds and interruptions, I retreat to the big hay-barn, and on an

improvised table in front of the big open barn-doors, looking out into

the sunlit fields where I hoed corn or made hay as a boy, and write

this and other papers.

The peace of the hills is about me and upon me, and the leisure of the

summer clouds, whose shadows I see slowly drifting across the face of

the landscape. The dissonance and the turbulence and the stenches of

cities, how far off they seem; the noise and the dust and the acrimony

of politics--how completely the hum of the honey-bees and the twitter

of swallows blot them all out!

In the circuit of the hills, the days take form and character as they

do not in town, or in a country of low horizons. George Eliot says in

one of her letters: “In the country the days have broad open spaces

and the very stillness seems to give a delightful roominess to the

hours.” This is especially true in a hilly and mountainous country,

where the eye has a great depth of perspective opened to it. Take those

extra brilliant days that we so often have in the autumn--what a vivid

sense one gets of their splendor amid the hills! The deep, cradle-like

valleys, and the long flowing mountain lines, make a fit receptacle for

the day’s beauty; they hold and accumulate it, as it were. I think of

Emerson’s line:

“O, tenderly the haughty day fills his blue urn with fire.”

The valleys are vast blue urns that hold a generous portion of the

lucid hours.

To feel to the full the peace of the hills, one must choose his

hills, and see to it that they are gentle and restful in character.

Abruptness, jagged lines, sharp angles, frowning precipices, while they

may add an element of picturesqueness, interfere with the feeling of

ease and restfulness that the peace of the hills implies. The eye is

disturbed by a confusion of broken and abrupt lines as is the ear by a

volume of discordant sounds. Long, undulating mountain lines, broad,

cradle-like valleys, easy basking hill-slopes, as well as the absence

of loud and discordant sounds, are a factor in the restfulness of any

landscape.

My landscape is very old geologically, as old as the order of

vertebrate animals, but young historically, having been settled only

about one hundred and fifty years. The original forests still cover

the tops of the mountains with a dark-green mantle, which comes well

down upon their sides, where it is cut and torn and notched into by the

upper fields of the valley farms.

I call my place Woodchuck Lodge, as I tell my friends, because we are

beleagured by these rodents. There is a cordon of woodchuck-holes all

around us. In the orchard, in the meadows, in the pastures, these

whistling marmots have their dens. Here one might easily have woodchuck

venison for dinner every day, yea, and for supper and breakfast, too,

if one could acquire a taste for it. I tried to dine on a woodchuck

once when I was a boy, but never have felt inclined to repeat the

experiment. If one were born in the woods and lived in the woods,

maybe he could relish a woodchuck. Talk about being autocthonous, and

savoring of the soil--try a woodchuck! The feeding habits of this

animal are as cleanly as those of a sheep or a cow--clover, plantain,

peas, beans, cucumbers, cabbages, apples--all sweet and succulent

things go to the making of his flabby body; yet he spends so much of

his time in pickle in the ground that his flesh is rank with the earth

flavor. He is not lean like a rabbit or a squirrel, nor so firm of

muscle as a ’coon or a ’possum; he is little more than a skin filled

with viscera. He is busy all summer storing up fat in his loose pouch

of a body for fuel during his long winter sleep. This sleep appears

to begin in late September, or after the first white frost. This year

I saw my last specimen on the twenty-eighth of the month as he was

running in great haste to his hole. Evidently he does not like the

pinch of the cold. He is a fair-weather animal and is the epicure

of the meadows and pastures. While the apples are still mellow on

the ground, while the red-thorn is still dropping its fruit, and the

aftermath is still fresh in the meadows, my woodchucks turn their backs

upon the world and retreat to their underground chambers for their six

months’ slumber. I know of no other hibernating animal that retires

from the light of day so early in the season. His active life stretches

from the vernal equinox to the autumnal equinox, and that is about all.

Half the year he is under ground, and at least half of each summer

day. No wonder his flesh is rank with the earth flavor. He appears to

live only to accumulate his winter store of fat. Apparently he comes

out of his den in summer only to feed, and maybe occasionally to bask

in the sunshine. He is never sportive or discursive like the birds and

squirrels. Life is a very serious business with him, and he has reduced

it to the lowest terms--eat, breed, and sleep. If woodchucks ever

engage in any sort of play, like other wild creatures, I have never

seen them, though I once had a tame young ’chuck that would play with

the kitten.

The woodchuck probably sleeps more than half the time in summer; he

economizes his precious fat. Only once have I seen his tracks on the

snow. This was in late December; and following them up, I found the

woodchuck wandering about the meadow like one half demented. Something

had evidently gone wrong with him. Apparently he had not succeeded

in storing up his usual amount of fat. He showed little fight, and

we picked him up by the tail, put him into the sleigh, and brought

him home. A place under the barn floor was given to him, but he did

not long survive. All the glory of the fall, the heyday of the ’coon

and the squirrels, the woodchuck misses. No golden October, no Indian

summer for him; he has had his day.

Though the woodchuck’s muscles are flabby, his heart is stout. The

farm-dog can kill him, but he cannot make him show fear or dismay; he

is game to the last. Twice I have seen him from my porch at Woodchuck

Lodge put on so bold a front, and become so aggressive, when surprised

in the middle of a field by a big shepherd-dog, that the dog did not

dare attack him, but circled about, seeking some unfair advantage,

only to be met at every point with those threatening, grating teeth.

In one case the woodchuck was far from his hole, and he kept charging

the dog and driving him nearer and nearer the stone wall, where his

own safety lay. An observer inoculated with the idea of animal reason

would have said that the tactics of the ’chuck were premeditated; but

I am sure he was too much engrossed with the task of defending himself

from the jaws of that dog to do any logical thinking or planning.

It was only the fortunes of battle that finally brought the hunter

and the hunted near the hole of safety, when, seeing his chance, the

woodchuck made a sudden, successful dash, too hurried, I fancy, even

to whistle his usual note of defiance. In the other case, the dog was

of a still more timid nature, and when the surprised woodchuck showed

fight, he concluded that he had no business at all with that particular

’chuck, which actually chased him from the meadow. I can still see the

woodchuck’s bristling, expanded tail as he drove fiercely after the

fleeing dog, which, with a tail anything but threatening, escaped over

the wall into the road.

I find that one may be the principal actor in a little comedy, and not

see the humor of it at all at the time. I know the humor of a race I

had with a ’chuck last summer in my orchard was quite lost upon me till

it was over, and the ’chuck was in his hole, and I was back upon my

porch recovering my wind. The ’chuck was a hundred yards or more from

his den when I leaped over the fence from the road and surprised him. I

pressed him so closely that he took refuge in an apple-tree. Instantly

seeing his mistake, as the missile I hurled struck the tree, he sprang

down and rushed for his hole, a hundred and fifty feet away. But I got

there first. The ’chuck paused twenty feet to one side and regarded me

intently, defiantly. We stood and glared at each other a few moments,

while I recovered my breath. I wanted the scalp of that “varmint.” I

knew that he would make himself believe that I had planted my garden

for his special benefit, and I wanted to anticipate that conclusion. I

was weaponless. Twenty or more feet from me, on the opposite side from

the ’chuck, I saw a stone that would answer my purpose. I calculated

the chances; so did the woodchuck; I sprang for the stone and the

’chuck sprang for his hole, and was in it as my hand touched the stone.

He had won! As I sat on my porch, the recklessness and absurdity of a

man more than threescore and ten running down a woodchuck came over me;

and I have not yielded to such a temptation since.

II

Where cattle and woodchuck thrive, there thrive I. The pastoral is

in my veins. Clover and timothy, daisies and buttercups indirectly

colored my youthful life; and if the dairy cow did not rock my cradle,

her products sustained the hand that did rock it. Hence I love this

land of wide, open, grassy fields, of smooth, broad-backed hills,

and of long, sweeping mountain lines. The cow fits well into these

scenes. It seems as if her broad, smooth muzzle and her potent tongue

might have shaped the landscape; it is certainly her cropping that has

brought about the hour-glass form of so many of the red-thorn trees,

which give a unique feature to the fields. Her fragrant breath is upon

the air, her hoof-prints are upon the highway; she may not yet have

attained to wisdom, yet surely all her ways are ways of pleasantness

and all her paths are paths of peace. Hence, when her ways and her

paths coincide with mine, I thrive best. From Woodchuck Lodge I look

out upon broad pastures, lands where dairy herds have grazed for a

hundred years, never the same herd for many summers, but all of the

same habits and dispositions. They all scour the pastures in the same

way, scattering, searching out every nook and corner, leaving no yard

of ground unvisited, apparently hunting each day for the sweet morsel

they missed the day before, disposing themselves in picturesque groups

upon the hills; never massed, except under the shade-trees on hot days;

slow-moving, making their paths here and there, lingering under the

red-thorn trees, where the fruit begins to drop in September; tossing

their heads above the orchard wall, where the fragrance of ripening

apples is on the air; in the autumn lying upon the cold, damp ground

and ruminating contentedly, with no fear of our ills and pains before

them; wading in the swamps, converging slowly toward the pasture-bars

as milking-time draws nigh, with always some tardy, indifferent ones

that the farm-dog has to hurry up; many colored--white, black, red,

brown--at times showing rare gentleness and affection toward one

another, such as licking one another’s heads or bodies, then spitefully

butting or goring one another; occasionally one of them lifting up her

head and sending her mellow voice over the hills like a horn, as if

to give voice to a vague unrest, or invoking some far-off divinity to

release the imprisoned Io--what a series of shifting rural pictures I

thus have spread out before me! Such an atmosphere of peace and leisure

over it all! The unhurrying and ruminating cattle make the days long;

they make the fields friendly, the hills eloquent, the shade-trees

idyllic. I wake up to hear the farmer summoning them from the field

in the dewy summer dawns, and I listen for his call to them on the

tranquil afternoons. One season an especially musical voice did the

evening calling--a trained voice from beyond the hills. What a pleasure

it was as we swung in our hammocks under apple-trees to hear the free,

sonorous summons, and to see the response of the herd in many-colored

lines converging down the slope to the bar-way!

When the meadows have gotten a new carpet of tender grass in September,

and the cows are free to range in them, a new series of moving pictures

greets the eye. The grazing forms have a finer setting now, and

contentment and satisfaction are in every movement. How they sweep off

the tender herbage, into what artistic groups they naturally fall,

what pictures of peace and plenty they present! When they lie down to

ruminate, Emerson’s sentence comes to mind: “And the cattle lying on

the ground seem to have great and tranquil thoughts.” As a matter of

fact, I suppose no more vacant mind could be found in the universe

than that of the cow when she is reposing in a field, chewing her

cud. But she is the cause of tranquil if not of great thoughts in the

lookers-on, and that is enough. Tranquillity attends her wherever she

goes; it beams from her eyes, and lingers in her footsteps.

I sympathize with Whitman as he expressed himself in these lines:

“I think I could turn and live with the animals, they are so placid

and self-contain’d,

I stand and look at them, long and long.

“They do not sweat and whine about their condition,

They do not lie awake in the dark and weep for their sins,

They do not make me sick discussing their duty to God,

Not one is dissatisfied, not one is demented with the mania of

owning things,

Not one kneels to another, nor to his kind that lived thousands of

years ago,

Not one is respectable or happy over the whole earth.”

III

If one has a bit of the farmer in him, it is a pleasure in the country

to have a real farmer for a neighbor--a man whose heart is in his work,

who is not longing for the town or the city, who improves his fields,

who makes two spears of grass grow where none grew before, whose whole

farm has an atmosphere of thrift and well-being. There are so many

reluctant, half-hearted farmers in our eastern States nowadays, so many

who do only what they have to do in order to survive; who leave the

paternal acres to run to weeds or brush; the paternal fences to fall

into ruins; the paternal orchards untrimmed and unplowed; the paternal

meadows unfertilized, while the fertilizer wastes in the barn-yard; who

get but one spear of grass where their fathers or grandfathers got two

or three; and whose plaint always is that farming does not pay. What is

the matter with our rural population? Has all the good farming blood

gone West, and do only the dregs of it remain?

It is the man who makes the farm, as truly as it is the man who makes

any other business; it is the man behind the plow, as truly as it is

the man behind the gun, that wins the battle. A half-heart never won

a whole sheaf yet. The average farmer has deteriorated. He may know

more, but he does less than his father. He is like the second or third

steeping of the tea. Did the original settlers and improvers of the

farms, and the generations that followed them, leave all their virtue

and grip in the soil? It is certainly true that in my section the last

two generations have lived off the capital of labor and brains which

their ancestors put into the land; only here and there has a man added

anything, only here and there is a farmer who does not wish he had some

other business. If such men had that other business, they would reap

the same poor results. In the long run, you cannot reap where you have

not sown, and the only seed you can sow, in any business that yields

tenfold, is yourself--your own wit, your own industry. Unless you

plant your heart with your corn, it will mostly go to suckers; unless

you strike your own roots into the subsoil of your lands, it will not

bear fruit in your character, or in your bank-account--all of which

is simply saying that thin, leachy land will not bear good crops, and

unless a man has the real farming stuff in him, his farm quickly shows

it.

My neighbor makes smooth the way of the plow and of the mower. Last

summer I saw him take enough stones and rocks from a three-acre field

to build quite a fortress; and land whose slumbers had never been

disturbed by the plow was soon knee-high with Hungarian grass. How

one likes to see a permanent betterment of the land like that!--piles

of renegade stone and rock. It is such things that make the country

richer. If all New England and New York had had such drastic treatment

years ago, the blight of discouraged farming never would have fallen

upon them, and the prairie States would not have so far distanced the

granite States. A granite soil should grow a better crop of men than

the silt of lake or river bottom, though it yields less corn to the

acre.

The prairie makes a strong appeal to a man’s indolence and cupidity;

it is a place where he can sit at ease and let his team do most of his

work. But I much doubt whether the western farms ever will lay the

strong hands upon their possessors that our more varied and picturesque

eastern farms lay. Every field in these farms has a character of its

own, and the farms differ from one another as much as the people do.

An eastern farm is the place for a home; the western farm is the

place to grow wheat, pork, and beef. Oh, the flat, featureless,

monotonous, cornstalk-littered middle West! how can the rural virtues

of contentment and domesticity thrive there? There is no spot to make

your nest except right out on the rim of the world; no spot for a walk

or a picnic except in the featureless open of a thousand miles of black

prairie--the roads black, straight lines of mud or dust through the

landscape; the streams slow, indolent channels of muddy water; the

woods, where there are woods, a dull assemblage of straight-trunked

trees; the sky a brazen dome that shuts down upon you; there are no

hills or mountains to lift it up. The prairie draws no strong distinct

lines against the sky; the horizon is vague and baffling. Ah, my

mountains are very old measured by the geologic calendar! Yet how

foreign to our experience or ways of thinking it seems to speak of

mountains as either old or young, as if birth and death apply to them

also. But such is the fact: mountains have their day, which day is the

geologist’s day of millions of years. My mountains were being carved

out of a great plateau by the elements while the prairies were still

under the sea, and while most of the Rocky Mountains and the Alps, and

the Himalayas were gestating in the vast earth-womb. In point of age,

these mountains beside the Catskills are like infants beside their

great-grandfathers. Yet it is a singular contradiction that in their

outlines old mountains look young, and young mountains look old. The

only youthful feature about young mountains is that they carry their

heads very high, and the only old feature about old mountains is that

they have a look of repose and calmness and peace. All the gauntness,

leanness, angularity, and crumbling decrepitude are with the young

mountains; all the smoothness, plumpness, graceful flowing lines of

youth are with the old mountains. Not till the rocks are clothed with

soil made out of their own decay are outlines softened and life made

possible. Youthful mountains like the Alps are battle-marked by the

elements, and their proud heads are continually being laid low by

frost, wind, and snow; they are scarred and broken by avalanches the

season through. Old mountains, such as the Appalachian range, wear an

armor of soil and verdure over their rounded forms on which the arrows

of time have little effect. The turbulent and noisy and stiff-necked

period of youth is far behind them.

Hundreds of dairy-farms nestle in the laps of the Catskills; and their

huge, grassy aprons, only a little wrinkled here and there, hold as

many grazing herds. Woodchuck Lodge is well upon the knee of one of

the ranges, and the fields we look upon are like green drapery lying

in graceful curves and broad, smooth masses over huge extended limbs.

Patches of maple forest here and there bend over a rounded arm or

shoulder, like a fur cape upon a woman. Here and there also huge,

weather-worn boulders rest upon the ground, dropped there by the moving

ice-sheet tens upon tens of thousands of years ago; and here and there

are streaks of land completely covered with smaller rocks wedged and

driven into the ground. It used to be told me in my youth that the

devil’s apron-string broke as he was carrying a load of these rocks

overhead, and let the mass down upon the ground. The farmers seldom

attempt to clear away these leavings of the devil.

IV

My interest in the birds is not as keen as it once was, but they are

still an asset in my life. I must live where I can hear the crows caw,

the robins sing, and the song-sparrow trill. If I can hear also the

partridge drum, and the owl hoot, and the chipmunk cluck in the still

days of autumn, so much the better. The crow is such a true countryman,

so much at home everywhere, so thoroughly in possession of the land,

going his way winter and summer in such noisy contentment and pride

of possession, that I cannot leave him out. The bird I missed most in

California was the crow. I missed his glistening coat in the fields,

his ebony form and hearty call in the sky.

One advantage of sleeping out of doors, as we do at Woodchuck Lodge,

is that you hear the day ushered in by the birds. Toward autumn you

hear the crows first, making proclamation in all directions that it

is time to be up and doing, and that life is a good thing. There is

not a bit of doubt or discouragement in their tones. They have enjoyed

the night, and they have a stout heart for the day. They proclaim

it as they fly over my porch at five o’clock in the morning; they

call it from the orchard, they bandy the message back and forth in

the neighboring fields; the air is streaked with cheery greetings and

raucous salutations. Toward the end of August, or in early September,

I witness with pleasure their huge mass-meetings or annual congress on

the pasture-hills or in the borders of the woods. Before that time,

you see them singly or in loose bands; but on some day in late summer,

or in early autumn, you see the clans assemble as if for some rare

festival and grand tribal discussion. A multitudinous cawing attracts

your attention when you look hillward and see a swarm of dusky forms

circling in the air, their voices mingling in one dissonant wave of

sound, while loose bands of other dusky forms come from all points of

the compass to join them. Presently many hundred crows are assembled,

alternately lighted upon the ground and silently walking about as if

feeding, or circling in the air, cawing as if they would be heard in

the next township. What they are doing or saying or settling, what

it all means, whether they meet by appointment in the human fashion,

whether it is a jubilee, a parliament, or a convention, I confess I

should like to know. But second thought tells me it is more likely

the gregarious instinct asserting itself after the scatterings and

separations of the summer. The time of the rookery is not far off, when

the inclement season will find all the crows from a large section of

the country massed at night in lonely tree-tops in some secluded wood.

These early noisy assemblages may be preliminary to the winter union of

the tribe. What an engrossing affair it seems to be with the crows, how

oblivious they appear to all else in the world! The world was made for

crows, and what concerns them is alone important. The meeting adjourns,

from time to time, from the fields to the woods, then back again, the

babel of voices waxing or waning according as they are on the wing

or at rest. Sometimes they meet several days in succession and then

disperse, going away in different directions and irregularly, singly or

in pairs and bands, as men do on similar occasions. No doubt in these

great reunions the crows experience some sort of feeling or emotion,

though one would doubtless err in ascribing to them anything like

human procedure. It is not a definite purpose, but a tribal instinct,

that finds expression in their jubilees.

The crow seems to have a great deal of business besides getting a

living. How social, how communicative he is--what picnics he has in

the fields and woods, how absolutely at home is he at all times and

places! I see them from my window flying by, by twos or threes or more,

on happy, holiday wings, sliding down the air, or diving and chasing

one another, or walking about the fields, their coats glistening in

the sun, the movement of their heads timing the movements of their

feet--what an air of independence and respectability and well-being

attends them always! The pedestrian crow! no more graceful walker ever

trod the turf. How different his bearing from that of a game-bird, and

from any of the falcon tribe. He never tries to hide like the former,

and he is never morose and sulky like the latter. He is gay and social

and in possession of the land; the world is his and he knows it, and

life is good.

I suppose that if his flesh were edible, like that of the gallinaceous

birds, he would have many more enemies and his whole demeanor would

be different. His complacent, self-satisfied air would vanish. He

would not advertise his comings and goings so loudly. He would be less

conspicuous in the landscape; his huge mass-meetings in September would

be more silent and withdrawn. Well, then, he would not be the crow--the

happy, devil-may-care creature as we now know him.

His little gaily dressed brother, the jay, does not tempt the sportsman

any more than the crow does, but he tempts other creatures--the owl

and squirrels, and maybe the hawks. Hence his tribe is much less. His

range is also more restricted, and his feeding habits are much less

miscellaneous. Only the woods and groves are his; the fields and rivers

he knows not.

The crow is a noisy bird. All his tribe are noisy, but the noise

probably has little psychic significance. The raven in Alaska appears

to soliloquize most of the time. This talkativeness of the crow tribe

is probably only a phase of crow life, and signifies no more and no

less than other phases--their color, their cunning, the flick of their

wings, and the like. The barn-yard fowls are loquacious also, but

probably their loquacity is not attended with much psychic activity.

In the mornings of early summer the out-of-door sleeper is more likely

to be awakened by the song-birds. In June and early July they strike

up about half-past three. “When it is light enough to see that all is

well around you, it is light enough to sing,” they carol. “Before the

early worm is stirring, we will celebrate the coming of day.” During

the summer the song-sparrows have been the first to nudge me in the

morning with their songs. One little sparrow especially would perch on

the telephone-wire above the roadside and go through his repertoire

of five songs with great regularity and joyousness. He will long be

associated in my mind with those early, fragrant, summer dawns. One of

his five songs fell so easily into words that I had only to call the

attention of my friends to it to have them hear the words that I heard:

“If, if, if you please, Mr. Durkee,”--the last word a little prolonged,

and with a rising inflection. Another was not quite so well expressed

by these words: “Please, please, speak to me, sweetheart.” The third

one suggested this sentence: “Then, then, Fitzhugh says, yes, sir!”

The fourth one was something like this: “If, if, if you seize her, do

it quick.” The fifth one baffled me to suggest by words. But in August

his musical enthusiasm began to decline. His different songs lost their

distinctiveness and emphasis. It was as if they had faded and become

blurred with the progress of the season.

The little birds are insignificant and unobtrusive on the great

background of nature, yet if one learns to distinguish them and to

love them, their songs may become a sort of accompaniment to one’s

daily life. In May, while I was much occupied in repairing and making

habitable an old farm-house, a solitary, mourning, ground-warbler,

which one rarely sees or hears, came and tarried about the place for

a week or ten days, singing most of each forenoon in the orchard

and garden about the house, and giving to my occupation a touch of

something rare and sylvan. He lent to the apple-trees, which I had

known as a boy, an interest that the boy knew not. Then he went away,

whether on the arrival of his mate or not I do not know.

[Illustration: Photograph, copyright, by Alvin Langdon Coburn.

Color-tone made for ~The Century~ by Henry Davidson

JOHN BURROUGHS

]

A butternut-tree stands across the road in front of Woodchuck Lodge.

One season the red squirrels stored the butternuts in the wall of one

of the upper rooms of the unoccupied house, to which they gained access

through a hole in the siding. When we moved in, in the summer, the

squirrels soon became uneasy, and one day one of them began removing

the butternuts, not to some other granary or place of safety, but

to the grass and dry leaves on the ground in the orchard. He was

unwittingly planting them by the act of hiding them. The automatic

character of much animal behavior, the extent to which their lives flow

in fixed channels, was well seen in the behavior of this squirrel.

His procedure in transferring the nuts from his den in the house to

the ground in the orchard, a distance of probably one hundred feet,

was as definite and regular as that of a piece of machinery. He would

rush up and over the roof of the house with a nut in his mouth, by

those sharp, spasmodic sallies so characteristic of the movements of

the red squirrel, down the corner of the house to the ground by the

same jerky movements, across some rubbish and open ground in the same

manner, alert and cautious, up the corner of a small building ten feet

high and eight long, over its roof, with arched tail and spread feet,

snickering and jerking, down to the ground on the other side, dashing

to the trunk of an apple-tree ten feet away, up it a few feet to make

an observation, then down to the ground again, and out into the grass,

where he would carefully hide his nut, and cover it with leaves. Then

back to the house again by precisely the same route and with precisely

the same movements, and bring another nut. Day after day I saw him thus

engaged till apparently all the nuts were removed. He probably did not

know he was planting butternut-trees for other red squirrels, but that

was what he was blindly doing. The crows and jays carry away and plant

acorns and chestnuts in the same blind way, thereby often causing a

pine forest to be succeeded by these trees.

The red squirrel is only an irregular storer of nuts in the autumn.

In this respect he stands half-way between the chipmunk and the gray

squirrel, one of which regularly lays up winter stores and the other

none at all.

How diverse are the ways of nature in reaching the same end! Both the

chipmunk and the woodchuck lay up stores against the needs of winter,

the latter in the shape of fat upon his own ribs, and the former in

the shape of seeds and nuts in his den in the ground; and I fancy that

one of them is no more conscious of what he is doing than the other.

Animals do not take conscious thought of the future; it is as if

something in their organization took thought for them. One November,

seized with the cruel desire to go to the bottom of the question of

the chipmunk’s winter stores, I dug out one after he had got his house

settled for the season. I found his den three feet below the surface

of the ground--just beyond the frostline--and containing nearly four

quarts of various seeds, most of them the little black grains of wild

buckwheat--two hundred and fifty thousand of them, I estimated--all

cleaned of their husks as neatly as if done by some patent machine.

How many perilous journeys along stone walls and through weedy tangles

this store of seeds represented! One would say at least a thousand

trips, beset by many dangers from hawks and cats and weasels and other

enemies of the little rodent.

The chipmunk is provident; he is a wise housekeeper, but one can hardly

envy him those three or four months of inaction in the pitchy darkness

of his subterranean den. His mate is not with him, and evidently the

oblivion of the hibernating sleep, like that of the woodchuck and of

certain mice, is not his. The life of the red and gray squirrels, who

are more or less active all winter, seems preferable. They lay up no

stores and are no doubt often cold and hungry, but the light of day

and the freedom of the snow and of the tree-tops are theirs. Abundant

stores are a good thing for both man and beast, but action, adventure,

struggle are better.

THE FOREIGN TRADE OF THE UNITED STATES

(“THE TRADE OF THE WORLD” PAPERS)

BY JAMES DAVENPORT WHELPLEY

Author of “The Commercial Strength of Great Britain,” “Germany’s

Foreign Trade,” etc.

Queen Elizabeth was the founder of the school of “dollar diplomacy,”

and to this day her memory is revered by the merchant gilds of London.

This great queen paid much attention to the welfare of industry at

home, and sent trade adventurers abroad to open avenues of foreign

commerce; and in the degree with which the rulers and governments of

all lands have observed the necessities and development of the material

interests of their respective countries have nations flourished or

marked time.

Through a peculiar misuse of the term, the foreign policy of the United

States has been termed “dollar diplomacy,” whereas, partly because of

national tradition and partly through lack of skill and experience,

the diplomacy of America has less relation to the extension of foreign

commerce than that of any other great modern nation. American diplomacy

has been governed more by altruistic ideas, the protection of foreign

peoples against themselves and others, the elimination of money

tributes and indemnities, the recognition of new governments without

conditions, and arbitration of international troubles as a neutral

nation. In these and in many other ways America has played her part

in various international controversies; but in the general scramble

for selfish advantage in all these affairs she has taken little or

no successful part. Yet American diplomacy has been called that of

the “dollar,” and has been credited in the minds of many of her own

citizens, as well as by foreigners, with a mercenary basis.

The people of a nation have it within their power to advance the

interests of their foreign commerce in two ways: one by intelligent

legislation at home, and the other by intelligent diplomacy abroad.

The shipment of merchandise from one country to another means to the

selling nation a foreign market for the raw material, the employment

of labor to the extent of from thirty to ninety per cent. of the

selling value of the goods, and the payment for this material and

labor by foreigners in money or its equivalent. It is a clear gain

in every phase of the transaction. There is an old frontier adage,

which originated in the early days of the Western boom, to the effect

that “outside money makes the camp.” It is a homely expression that

summarizes the advantages of an export of two billion dollars’ worth

of goods with a comprehensiveness equal to its original application.

It is not too much to say that anything in the shape of legislation or

of increased facilities which assists the outward flow of the products

of labor is of unquestioned advantage to the producing nation. An

unnatural, though perhaps comprehensible, attitude of suspicion toward

successful export has come about in the United States. This has led to

hostility toward special rail and water-rates for export, lower prices

for bulk foreign business, niggardliness of national expenditures

for diplomatic representation and for the work of the Department of

Commerce and its foreign-trade bureau. It might almost be said that the

great and growing figures of foreign trade, issued triumphantly every

year by the government statisticians, have been achieved despite the

obstructions placed in the path of their progress.

The growth of those figures in their largest aspect is due to organized

private effort, the methods and operations of which are a sealed

book to the government official or the general public, and which

unfortunately have shared in the recent and sweeping condemnation

of the business methods of all big corporations. There has been no

sifting of the wheat from the chaff, the good from the evil, with most

deplorable results, for which both public and corporations are to

blame. The natural result has been that in attempting to regulate the

home activities of “big business” their foreign activities have been

hindered and even checked. Lost ground in foreign directions is more

difficult to regain than at home, for certain artificial and natural

barriers always exist, which favor home markets, while foreign trade

meets well-equipped rivals at least on equal terms, and often with a

handicap.

In the year 1913 the people of the United States are entering upon a

radical change in the national attitude toward domestic and foreign

commerce. There is a partial reversal of policy toward home industry;

there is also an important experiment afoot in diplomacy. It is too

early to say just how radical these changes will be in the final

reckoning, or what may be the outcome. It is quite possible that

increased freedom of trade may bring good results at home; and if

Congress recognizes the need of a commercial diplomacy auxiliary

to that of the litterateur, the reformer, the peace-advocate, the

missionary, and the general uplifter of mankind, and the administration

provides competent, permanent, and resident commercial diplomats or

attachés to all important American missions, a threatened disadvantage

may be turned into a victory. At present, however, American foreign

trade is the foot-ball of national politics.

Private enterprise, with its able American representatives abroad, is

the only real guard against serious damage possessed by this great

asset of the nation. The advance of American foreign commerce may be

likened to a more or less friendly conflict with an allied army of

foreign competitors. This is specially true of American trade, for it

is generally a new-comer, and is regarded with dislike and antagonism

to such an extent as to induce combinations of rivals to resist its

advance.

The strongest efforts of American diplomacy should be directed to

Russia and China to bring about a commercial entente between the

United States and these two countries. The future of China as a market

for foreign enterprise and merchandise will develop slowly, it is

true, but the results will in time prove stupendous. In view of this,

firm foundations should be laid for the structure of international

trade, which will inevitably develop in the course of years. In the

case of Russia there is no time to be lost. Here is a great area of

wonderfully productive territory inhabited by scores of millions of

people. Education is spreading among these people, and their wants

are multiplying. Such foreign trade as has found a lodgment there

is of the kind America wants, and will need more and more as her

productiveness increases and the oversupply of home markets becomes

more noticeable. England, Germany, France, the Low Countries, and those

of Scandinavia are losing no time. Political, financial, commercial,

and industrial bonds are being forged with all possible rapidity to

this awakening nation of industrious people. American interests in

Russia are already large, but their existence is due to private and

not national initiative. As a nation we have not only done much to

discourage the betterment of intercourse with Russia, but have even

actually threatened the existence of American interests therein by

inviting antagonism instead of friendly coöperation. It is not too late

to remedy this unfortunate attitude, but the situation needs prompt,

wise, and fearless handling by those responsible for the foreign policy

of the United States.

American foreign commerce rests on a basis of international friendship.

Once established, the needs of the respective countries determine the

extent of international trading, modified as it must be, however, by

conditions of transportation and such fiscal restrictions as may be

imposed. Leaving the matter of price and quality to be dealt with by

the industrial exporter, as must be the case, the influence of the

Government remains as the most important outside factor in determining

the prosperity of this trade. Under the control of the Government

come the treaty-making power, with its bid for favorable reception

of American products; the official attitude toward facilities for the

manufacturing of exports and toward transportation; and assistance in

gathering information for exporters. The important, but more technical,

details of foreign commerce can safely be left to private enterprise in

its effort toward profitable trading. There is no doubt as to the good

intention of government officials and of those who vote the money for

their work: it is, of course, that American consumers shall benefit.

There are two points of view, however, well illustrated in the attitude

of the British and the United States Government, respectively, as

to the direction in which governmental efforts may be extended in

the furtherance of foreign trade. The British Government pays great

attention to the diplomatic end of the business, and lets private

enterprise follow up any advantage gained. The United States Government

spends vastly more money and effort upon the details of trade, but in

many cases unfortunately attempts to build upon a shifting and insecure

foundation, in that the relations of the two countries may be weak

diplomatically, or there may be lack of knowledge or understanding as

to the general conditions to be met. For some American consul to inform

American manufacturers through the State Department of great openings

for the sale of goods does not mean necessarily that these goods can

be sold; for in some cases American competition would find itself

hopelessly handicapped by the superior trade diplomacy and knowledge

of its adversary, thus nullifying any possible superiority in goods or

prices.

From a practical point of view, to analyze American foreign trade in

detail would be an endless and useless task. It has grown to be what it

is through exports of food-stuffs and raw materials, followed naturally

by the surplus products of manufacturing. Of imports the same may be

said, reversing the order of the progression. The land furnished the

material, and labor came at its call from all parts of the world. The

logical result of plenty of material, a constantly increasing supply

of labor, combined with national ingenuity and a climate conducive to

the development of nervous energy, is the production of more or less

finished merchandise in such quantities as to keep half the ships of

the world in daily use carrying it to and fro. Whether governmental

intervention has helped or hindered has been the subject of controversy

since this commerce began, and will continue until commerce ends; but

out of it all must come a certain amount of wisdom, gained through

experience, which should be of practical benefit to those on whom rests

the responsibility of official coöperation with private adventure in

foreign lands.

The three great foreign trading nations of the world are England,

Germany, and the United States, in the order named. In 1912 the foreign

commerce of England amounted to a little less than $6,000,000,000,

that of Germany to more than $4,600,000,000, and that of the United

States to nearly $4,200,000,000. The total foreign trade of these three

countries is proportioned approximately between imports and exports as

follows:

England Germany United

States

Imports 60 per cent. 54 per cent. 43 per cent.

Exports 40 “ “ 46 “ “ 57 “ “

These figures mean that the United States is still a debtor nation.

If the imports of gold brought the imports level with the exports in

value, which they do not, but far from it, the figures would indicate

that the American people were getting cash for their goods instead of

merchandise, as would be the case if merchandise exports and imports

were equal. The most considerable factors that annually balance this

trade are the payments of interest and principal on American securities

held abroad, remittances by American immigrants to foreign lands, money

spent abroad by American tourists, and payments made to foreign-owned

vessels for freight-charges on goods carried to and from America. There

are several other factors in this balance, but the four named are the

most considerable. In the case of England and Germany, as well as many

other prosperous countries whose foreign-trade sheets show an excess

of imports over exports, this excess represents the profit on trading

abroad, and the inflow of returns upon capital invested abroad. In

other words, these nations are creditor, or money-lending, communities.

The imports of all money-lending countries, like France, England,

Germany, the Netherlands, and others, considerably exceed the exports,

while the exports of all borrowing, developing, or unequally developed

countries, like Russia, the United States, Argentina, Rumania, and many

others, exceed the imports, as the foreign investor must be paid his

interest, and the only source of money for such payment is eventually

either the product of the soil or of industry.

One hundred years ago, when the population of the United States

was about seven millions, the American people imported annually

considerably less than $100,000,000 worth of merchandise, less than ten

per cent. of which came in free of duty. In 1912, when the population

was more than ninety millions, the importations amounted to nearly

$1,700,000,000, of which about fifty-four per cent. entered duty free.

The average ad valorem rate of import duty on dutiable goods one

hundred years ago was about forty per cent., and on the total imports,

dutiable and free, it was about thirty-five per cent. In 1912 the

average ad valorem on dutiable goods was about the same as one hundred

years before, and on the total imports, both dutiable and free, it was

about nineteen per cent. The progress of American foreign trade in one

hundred years is recorded as follows:

_Year_ _Imports_ _Exports_ _Total Foreign

Trade_

1810 $85,000,000 $67,000,000 $152,000,000

1830 63,000,000 72,000,000 135,000,000

1850 174,000,000 144,000,000 318,000,000

1870 436,000,000 393,000,000 829,000,000

1890 790,000,000 858,000,000 1,648,000,000

1912 1,818,000,000 2,363,000,000 4,181,000,000

In one hundred years the population has increased more than thirteen

times, and the foreign trade more than twenty-five times. In 1810 the

per capita foreign trade of America was about $21, and in 1912 it was

nearly $40. These latter figures are really much more significant than

appears at first glance, for the population of America, as estimated

in 1810, was composed of a larger proportion of effective producing

units than in 1912. Few but white people were counted, the percentage

of women and children was smaller, and virtually every white American

was self-supporting. The estimate of to-day includes, therefore, a

much larger percentage of human beings who, though counted as units

in population, are not so potential in the material activities of

the nation. The $40 per capita of 1912 is much more significant of

the growth of American foreign interests, therefore, than merely the

increase from the $21 of 1810 appears.

Speaking generally, the foreign trade of the United States has

doubled every twenty years since 1830, regardless of wars, changes of

government, administrative policies, the rise or decline of shipping

interests, the increasing power of foreign competition, or the opening

and development of competitive territory in other parts of the world.

The development of industry in a country is usually written on the

character of the imports and exports, and the changes that take place

in the proportions of raw material and manufactured goods are most

significant. In the case of the United States, these are strikingly

shown in the more or less shifting percentages of a long period in

the growth of the nation--a period fully covering the time the United

States has figured to any marked degree in the economic affairs of the

world. In the last eighty-two years American foreign trade has been

roughly classified by percentages as follows:

_IMPORTS_

_1830_ _1870_ _1912_

Crude food-stuffs and

food animals 11.77 12.41 13.93

Food-stuffs partly or

wholly manufactured 15.39 22.03 11.86

Crude manufactured

material 6.72 12.76 33.63

Manufactures for use

in manufacture 8.22 12.75 17.77

Manufactures ready for

consumption 56.97 39.82 21.78

Miscellaneous .93 .23 1.03

------ ------ ------

100.00 100.00 100.00

The most noticeable features of the statement given above are that

the importation of crude food-stuffs and food animals remain about

the same in their relation to total imports, that the importation of

partly manufactured food-stuffs has decreased, that the importation

of materials for use in manufacture has enormously increased, and

that the importation of manufactured goods ready for consumption has

decreased by nearly two thirds. All of these figures, both of imports

and exports, are based on values and not on quantities. The latter

would be the most accurate measure of progress, as prices have changed

materially--either fallen or increased, mostly the latter--on many

important staples; but it would be virtually impossible to consider

these matters from a point of view other than that of values, where

everything is grouped under an inclusive total, and in all probability

the change that might follow a quantitative analysis, rather than one

based on values, would not materially alter any conclusions that might

be drawn. The changes in American exports during the same period were

by percentages as follows:

_EXPORTS_

_1830_ _1870_ _1912_

Crude food-stuffs and

food animals 4.65 11.12 4.60

Food-stuffs partly or

wholly manufactured 16.32 13.53 14.69

Crude manufactured

material 62.34 56.64 33.31

Manufactures for use

in manufacture 7.04 3.66 16.04

Manufactures ready

for consumption 9.34 14.96 30.98

Miscellaneous .31 .09 .38

------ ------ ------

100.00 100.00 100.00

The noticeable features of the record of American exports for the last

eighty-two years are that the export of food-stuffs has decreased

rather than increased in proportion to business in other commodities;

that the export of crude manufactured material has greatly decreased,

and in fact, with the exception of cotton, has become a negligible

quantity; and that the export of manufactured goods ready for

consumption has increased enormously. Exports of cotton are now the

basis of American export of raw material. Whereas the total production

of cotton in the United States in 1830 was only about 1,000,000 bales,

in 1912 the United States furnished nearly 11,000,000 bales for export,

valued at $625,000,000, amounting to fully five sixths of the value

of all raw material for manufacturing purposes exported by the United

States in that year.

The export of raw cotton in the case of the United States does not mean

any appreciable backwardness of home manufacture. The importations of

manufactured cotton goods are decreasing annually, so far as cloths are

concerned. In 1912 less than $8,000,000 in cotton cloth was imported

from abroad. The heaviest importation of cotton goods was in laces

and such other things as are specialties of foreign manufacture, in

many cases hereditary trades, or trades dependent upon cheap, trained

female labor, such as is not available in America. America uses

nearly 6,000,000 bales of home-grown cotton every year in her own

factories, and supplies not only the home market with manufactured

goods, but manufactures more than $30,000,000 worth for foreign sale,

in competition with the great spinning and manufacturing countries

of Europe. The growing of cotton is not a raw-material industry in

the strict sense of the word, for, owing to peculiarities of climate,

certain features of the American labor supply, and the great amount

of money this staple crop brings from abroad and distributes in

non-manufacturing districts, it possesses a peculiar and great economic

value to the country. Coal, tobacco, petroleum, and timber are the

more important of the crude materials exported from the United States

in addition to cotton; but the total value of all these is, as stated,

about one sixth of the whole.

The total value of the exports of domestic merchandise from the United

States in 1912 was about $2,363,000,000. As stated, cotton stands at

the head of the list. The iron and steel industry comes next; the

farmers of the United States furnish the third largest amount of

merchandise for export; and machinery of all kinds, oils, paper, fruit,

and chemicals, are the leaders in American export. The most interesting

changes that have taken place in American foreign trade in the last few

years are those that indicate certain possibilities of the future; in

fact, they are in a way prophetic of what is to happen in the economic

life of the nation. In 1902 93,000 head of cattle were imported, and in

1912 the importations numbered 325,000. In 1902 about 327,000 head of

cattle were exported, and in 1912 only about 46,000. This means that

the American people have nearly reached the point where the home market

absorbs all cattle grown in the country, and that in future other

peoples, who in the past have been dependent upon the United States for

their beef supply, must look elsewhere. The exportation of bread-stuffs

has decreased materially, while importation has quadrupled, thus

telling a story of shortage in food-supply, as did the change in the

cattle movement. This same shortage is shown in like changes in the

trade in meat products, dairy products, eggs, and nearly every other

variety of staple food.

The United States produces half the copper of the world, but both

exports and imports of this metal are increasing, showing that other

countries are sending copper to this country for treatment. In 1902,

America imported 135,000,000 pounds of tin plates, and in 1912 only

4,500,000 pounds. The exports of tin plates increased during the same

period from 3,500,000 pounds to 183,000,000 pounds. Iron and steel

show a marked decline in imports and an enormous gain in exports. The

American people are no longer importing automobiles to any extent,

but are increasing their sales abroad, and in 1912 sold $28,000,000

worth to foreign buyers. The importations of coffee virtually hold

their own, amounting in 1912 to nearly 1,000,000,000 pounds; but owing

to increased prices, the value of this importation is nearly double

that of 1902. The exports of the iron and steel industry of the United

States, including the manufactures of these materials as well, now

amount to about $1,000,000 per day. Europe takes the higher class of

goods, and Canada and South America take the rails, structural iron

and steel, heavy castings, and other like products that constitute the

heavy tonnage of the industry.

The countries taking their largest proportionate share of their imports

from the United States are: Haiti, 69 per cent.; Honduras, 68 per

cent.; Canada, 62 per cent.; Santo Domingo, 61 per cent.; Panama, 56

per cent.; Mexico, 55 per cent.; Cuba, 53 per cent.; and Costa Rica 51

per cent. England takes 17.3 per cent. of her imports from the United

States, Germany 13.3 per cent., and France 8.6 per cent. Of the South

American countries, Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela, and Peru take from

20 to 30 per cent. of their imports from the United States, while

others take smaller percentages, ranging from the 13.8 of Argentina

and the 12.8 of Brazil to the 2.8 per cent. of Bolivia. Other countries

draw very slightly upon the United States for their imports, notably

China, which takes only 5 per cent.; India, 3 per cent.; Morocco, less

than 1 per cent.; Servia, 1 per cent.; and about the same for Turkey

and Rumania. The great markets for American products at the present,

in total value of goods sold to the peoples of these countries, are

England, purchasing as she does from America goods to the amount of

$572,000,000; Canada, $285,000,000; Germany, $283,000,000; France,

$119,000,000; the Netherlands, $117,000,000; Italy, $70,000,000; Cuba,

$57,000,000; Mexico, $56,000,000; Russia, $52,000,000; Austria-Hungary,

Argentina, and Belgium, between $45,000,000 and $50,000,000 each, and

Australia, Brazil, and Japan, between $27,000,000 and $32,000,000 each.

Of the export trade of the United States, 60 per cent. goes to Europe,

23 per cent. to North America, 6 per cent. to South America, 5 per

cent. to Asia, 4 per cent. to Oceanica, and 2 per cent. to Africa.

American producers send more than 90 per cent. of their entire foreign

shipments, or more than $2,000,000,000 worth of goods, to nineteen

countries, and the remaining ten per cent. covers the trade with all

the rest of the world. England buys about 26 per cent. of the total

American export; Canada 15 per cent.; Germany 13 per cent.; France 7

per cent.; the Netherlands 4 per cent.; Italy, Cuba, and Belgium, each

3 per cent.; Mexico, Japan, Argentina, Australia, Russia, and Brazil,

each 2 per cent.; and Spain, Austria-Hungary, Panama, China, and the

Philippines, each about 1 per cent.

Official figures of imports and exports are useful as indications from

which deductions may safely be drawn, but they are not an accurate

record of the trade relations of any two countries. In some cases the

indirect trade of the United States with certain countries is much

larger than custom-house figures would indicate, in that American

goods are purchased by other nations, who act as distributors or

intermediaries in conducting the foreign trade of the world. This

is very largely so in American trade with England. That country is

credited with purchases of American goods far in excess of the needs

of the British people. These goods are bought by English firms whose

dealings are largely with other foreign countries, and by them sold

to their customers on the Continent of Europe, in Asia, Oceanica,

or elsewhere. A striking example of this is the American trade with

Russia. It is impossible to state exactly the value of American goods

which in time find their way to the Russian consumer, but it is vastly

in excess of the amount of trade between the United States and Russia,

or $52,380,000, as given in government statistics. In the official

statement of exports of American cotton, Russia is credited by the

Department of Commerce figures as receiving 64,590 bales, valued at

$3,796,867.

American consuls in Russia, and the cotton experts of that country,

estimate that Russia consumes annually nearly $50,000,000 worth of

American raw cotton, an amount nearly equal to the total export to

Russia of all American goods, according to United States government

figures. That the government figures are misleading is due to the fact

that they are figures of direct business only; and direct trade between

the United States and Russia is, for geographical, transportation, and

financial reasons, more or less hampered. American cotton is bought

for Russia in London, Hamburg, Antwerp, Copenhagen, and other great

European markets. The exports are credited in the United States to the

ports mentioned, and while the ultimate destination does not affect

the totals of American foreign trade, it does lead to wide-spread

confusion as to the comparative value of the various foreign markets

for American products. This is particularly unfortunate in the case of

Russia, a country with which the United States has recently had some

difficulty in the matter of a treaty of mutual trade and friendship.

Judging from United States government statistics, American trade

relations with Russia might be regarded as almost negligible; whereas

in fact they are already of the greatest value and importance, to say

nothing of the brilliant prospects of possible trade expansion in the

near future. Even the government figures show a direct sale to Russia

of nearly $50,000,000 worth of American goods, deducting the direct

sales of cotton. With a known consumption of $50,000,000 worth of

American cotton, this gives at least $100,000,000 as the value of

American sales to Russia. Cotton, however, is not the only merchandise

sold indirectly, and if other goods are handled in the same way to an

equal amount, it is possible that the annual sales of American goods to

Russia amount to nearly $200,000,000, or four times the amount allowed

by United States official figures.

This correction would give Russia fourth instead of ninth place in

the list of great buyers of American goods. This is the most striking

illustration of the deceptive feature of government trade-statistics

in determining the order of importance of foreign buyers of American

goods, though there are other countries which suffer in the estimation

of exporters for the same reason. As has been already stated, it was

peculiarly unfortunate that this was so in the case of Russia, for

those who, for reasons of their own, favored national retaliation

against that country through mutual trade relations used United States

government statistics to support their argument, and the American

public naturally accepted these data at their apparent value. A final

and accurate determination of the value of each foreign country as a

market for American merchandise, a laborious and almost impossible

task, would undoubtedly lead to interesting and unexpected results.

It would not only make many changes in the list of the most important

customers, but would immediately suggest possibilities of more direct

trading, which would stimulate American rail, shipping, and financial

interests, increase profits by cutting out the middleman, and in the

end give added stimulus to American foreign trade.

One of the most serious difficulties that confront the American

Government in its dealings with foreign nations is the inelasticity

of the American tariff laws. The most sensible and scientific tariff

law which the United States could have,--allowing that the principle

of tariff for revenue and protection is to prevail,--is such rate

of duty as may be deemed advisable, all things considered; an

arrangement whereby a surtax could be imposed upon goods from countries

discriminating against American merchandise, and a trading margin

for treaty-making purposes, ranging from the normal rate of duty,

as set forth in the customs laws, to absolute free trade between

the treaty-making powers. There is little or no hope that such a law

can prevail or will be formally advocated by any political party in

power; but it is a hopeful sign that it has been seriously suggested

and discussed by men prominent in the councils of the nation. That

tariff laws will in time be formulated on that basis is likely, but

such a statement reaches further into the domain of prophecy than is

apparently warranted in the present temper of actual legislation.

There is a simple truth, apparently often forgotten or ignored, and

it is that to give is necessary, to be able to take, in all dealings

between nations, as much as between individuals. All trading is in

the end a compromise, presumably mutually beneficent and equally so.

It rests with the wit and ability of the trader to see that he at

least comes out even. It would be interesting to know just how far

the late President McKinley intended to go in his advocacy of better

foreign-trade relations for the United States had not his tragic death

cut short his program. The last speech he made at Buffalo was crowded

with significance of what might come later. It was in a sense as though

he were only preparing the way for an important development of American

fiscal policy in connection with foreign trade. Those who were in his

closest confidence in the days just prior to his death have knowledge

of an evolution that had taken place in his mind--a mind that had given

more thorough thought and study to tariff matters than almost any

other in America at that time. They firmly believe that at the moment

the life of President McKinley ended, he had planned a pronunciamento

in favor of concessions to American foreign-trade interests which

would have startled the country, put the Republican party in line with

the mass of the voters who desired tariff revision, and of which his

Buffalo speech strongly advocating reciprocity in commerce was only the

opening paragraph. Had he lived, this one thing might have made a vast

difference in the subsequent fortunes of the Republican party; but when

he died his place was taken by a man whose marvelous activities did not

include an interest in the tariff. In fact, as he frankly expressed it,

the subject “bored” him, as it does many others, unfortunate for the

country as this may be.

The American diplomatic service has passed through some remarkable

phases in the last twenty-five years. A few years ago it was quite

frankly used as a means for rewarding political services to the party

in power. No good could possibly come out of such a system. There were

some exceptions to the general rule that American ambassadors and

ministers were either indifferent to or else ignorant of the needs of

the United States in international politics, but they were few and far

between. More recently men have been selected for the most important

places by reason of their wealth and social standing. Some of those

selected made excellent representatives, but owing to the shortness of

their terms of office they had no more than familiarized themselves

with their surroundings than they were either recalled or found it

expedient to return to their native land.

President Wilson has apparently established a new plan, or rather

revived an old one. He is selecting his foreign representatives

from the class known in Europe as the “intellectuals.” This policy

is adopted at a highly critical time in the history of the foreign

trading of the United States, and at a time when virtually all the

great international questions and controversies are those of respective

economic advantage, one nation over another. It comes also at a

time when the great commercial and industrial rivals of the United

States are pursuing a different policy, one which is perhaps worth

considering. England and Germany to a notable degree, and France,

Russia, and some others of the great Powers to a sufficient degree

to be noticeable, are training men for all diplomatic positions, and

promotions are made even to the highest places almost entirely upon the

merits and suitability of the candidates. The young man who enters the

foreign office service of England or Germany in a subordinate position

has within his power, if he develop accordingly, to become in time an

ambassador to some important country. He is thoroughly tried out, step

by step, as consul and minister before the highest rank is given to

him. He is moved about from one part of the world to another until he

becomes in truth a cosmopolitan not only in thought and habit, but

in language and knowledge. The most serious part of the education of

these men is, first, the economics of their own country, and, secondly,

the economics of the country to which they are to be accredited.

This education is practical and not theoretical. This is true to so

great an extent that, when a technical matter of trade enters into

a controversy between the two state departments, the minister or

ambassador is often found fully qualified to fight the battle himself

in aid of the material interests of the country he represents. There

are no more practical men anywhere than a majority of these who now

represent the progressive industrial countries of Europe as foreign

ministers or ambassadors. This particular feature of their equipment

for the office is not unnecessarily paraded, however, for their social

and political qualifications are more in the public eye. It is in the

private talks at the State Department at Washington, in London, Berlin,

Paris, St. Petersburg, or elsewhere, that their real fighting strength

is disclosed. It is not a question of private fortune with them, for

their governments remove any anxiety on that score by an adequate and

even abundant allowance of funds not only for salaries, but for housing

and maintenance. The British ambassador to Washington receives more

in salary and expense allowance than does the President of the United

States in proportion to the necessary expenditures of his office.

To the American manufacturer, deeply engaged with his cost of

production and the filling of orders, it may appear that too much

stress is laid upon the function of foreign diplomacy in the success of

American business abroad; but it will not be necessary to give emphasis

to its importance with those Americans who have already pioneered their

business into remote parts of the world. They know, through bitter

experience, how inefficiency in an American embassy or legation can

hinder and even destroy the greater possibilities for American success.

At present, and for years past, the fortunes of American foreign

trading depend, so far as diplomacy is concerned, upon the character,

ability, common sense, and adroitness of the individual government

representative abroad rather than upon the Government or the system as

a whole. Within the year 1912 we had the two extremes: in one country

an able, intelligent, and practical man, working persistently for weeks

to bring about a commercial entente cordiale between the United States

and the country in which he was stationed; and in another country

American interests were forced to appeal to English or other foreign

representatives to help them through a time of stress, because the

American representative considered things commercial as outside of

the province of his labors. Both of these men are out of office now

not because one was useful and the other useless, but because of the

system, or lack of system, which required their places for others.

An English minister who was stationed in an important country a few

years ago failed when there to secure certain large contracts for

English builders. This same minister is still in the service, but is

now kicking his heels in an unimportant place, where what he does or

does not is of little consequence. A certain German ambassador was

recently denied the place of his choice because he had done so well

where he was that his services were still needed at that point; but

when the crisis has passed, he will get his reward all the more surely.

The day will come in America when it will be realized that a nation

can well afford to cheapen for export by every means in its power,

and that such cheapness does not necessarily mean discrimination

against the home consumer. There are few signs of the dawn of this day

at the moment, and it will come only when the ultimate and general

overproduction of manufactures forces the attention of the whole nation

upon the need of still greater markets elsewhere. There is one comfort

for the people of the United States, possessed in no such degree by

any other nation at the present time or for several generations to

come, and that is, the abounding possibilities of the North American

continent in its natural resources, and the amazing vitality and

resourcefulness of its inhabitants.

[Illustration: LAÏLA, FROM MESOPOTAMIA

NEW-MADE AMERICANS

A Few Types of Foreign Women Sketched, in New York, from the Life

By W. T. Benda]

[Illustration: ZOBÉIDA, FROM SYRIA]

[Illustration: MARGHERITA, FROM ITALY]

[Illustration: JENNY, FROM CANADA

ULANA, FROM POLAND

DOLORES, FROM SPAIN

KALINKA, FROM BULGARIA

ALICE, FROM ENGLAND

SARAH, FROM SOUTHERN RUSSIA]

[Illustration]

THE DEVIL, HIS DUE

BY PHILIP CURTISS

Now, Furniss was a devil. I mean that exactly, and if I might, I should

like to explain it, for I wish to draw a distinction between the

devils and the merely devilish. If argot had not spoiled the phrase, I

might have said that he was a regular devil, as distinguished from the

volunteer, the territorial, the occasional, or the would-be devil.

The distinction between a regular devil and one who is merely devilish

is exactly the distinction between the professional and the amateur

in all occupations. The devilish do things purely for the éclat of

the doing, while the devils do them because they want the things

done. A professional carpenter carpenters in order that he may have

a table, to be used for his varying ends; an amateur uses his tools

merely for the sake of the chips. That an occasional amateur displays

unusual brilliancy in the accomplishment has nothing to do with the

distinction. The real devils, moreover, regard the devilish purely

with a mild amusement, if they regard them at all. Their only vexation

is that of professional craftsmen at the “pin-money” workers, whose

spasmodic efforts cut into legitimate trade.

The most powerful proof which I can bring to the statement that Furniss

was a real devil, however, is the one that he did not regard himself as

a devil at all. On the contrary, he regarded himself as an industrious

citizen, fairly successful in the accomplishments of his ends. As

a career, devilishness did not interest him in the slightest. Its

material rewards were all that he sought.

Now, at midnight, on the thirtieth of October, Furniss, with the best

intentions in the world, was standing in a group in the ball-room of

the Fitchly Country Club, harmlessly singing “Auld Lang Syne.” At one

minute past twelve the engineer turned out all the lights, having

standing instructions to do so, for Fitchly was a goodly town, and on

this particular night the steward had forgotten to make an exception.

The result was that which usually occurs when the lights are turned

out on a perfectly respectable and usually sane gathering of grown men

and women--every bit of asininity in the mob swarmed to the surface.

There were cat calls, screams, and suggestive labials, while all the

naturally executive began groping toward the door and the steward.

What the others did, however, did not matter. It was generally

understood that they were merely devilish, and no score was to be

counted against them. Furniss, on the other hand, played everything

for stakes, and his tally had to meet with a reckoning. For, when the

lights left their sudden wave of darkness on the mixed and rollicking

group, Furniss quietly and modestly followed the promptings of his

profession, turned slowly, gathered the nearest woman into his arms,

and thoroughly and deliberately kissed her. Who she was he had not the

slightest idea, nor did he, indeed, have any very lively curiosity.

The act was purely professional, perfectly methodic, as automatic

and unemotional as a response in a ritual. Thus, despite Furniss’s

known make-up, the fact would have passed unnoticed had it not been

for two things, first, that, owing to the deliberateness of Furniss

and the quickness of the engineer, the lights went on again before

he was through, and the second that the woman thus discovered in his

arms was the only one in the room whom he would have had the slightest

reason for wanting to kiss. It was a perfect triumph of circumstantial

evidence.

The sudden hush which fell on the group when the lights were restored

at once displayed the awfulness of Furniss’s depravity, as viewed by

the Fitchly Country Club, in riot assembled. Had any other man been

caught in the same act, with any other woman, there would have been

merely a triumphant outcry of self-acknowledged devilishness. The man

would have bought at the bar below, and the women would have screamed

themselves to their motors; but, by some unusual instinct that was

positively primitive, every man and woman in the room realized that

Furniss was a professional and his act took a much more vital aspect.

By the same perfect precision of instinct not a single iota of blame

was attached to the lady in question, for the accurate conception of

Furniss on the part of the Country Club demonstrated also that she was

only an instrument in a tragedy of the elements. One does not accuse a

person of being an accessory to a cyclone.

At the vivid and not wholly beautiful picture thus presented by

the electrics, the whole room foolishly and utterly unsuccessfully

attempted to give an imitation of a gathering which knows that nothing

has happened. After the awful hush of the first moment, the women began

quietly conversing in tones unusually subdued; the men began skylarking

and shouting on subjects unusually hollow. The object of instructing

the engineer to turn on the lights again, after midnight, had been to

allow the dance to continue until two in the morning. At one there was

not a single person left in the ball-room, and the waiters were already

sweeping up the fragments. Some fragments, however, they could not

sweep, and these make the following prelude:

Ten years before, at the age of twenty-five, Furniss had had one chance

in a million of being decent; that is to say, he had nearly married a

good woman, and that woman, needless to explain, was the one whom by

sheer accident he kissed just ten years later. Furthermore, it was the

nearest that he had ever come to marrying anybody, or ever would come,

and it was a hollow victory for the law of chances.

Furniss was a devil because he came of that stock. It bred true to

type, merely with refinements in each succeeding generation. His father

was a stout, red-faced man of the kind that, thirty years ago, drove

trotting-horses to a red-wheeled run-about, with wooden knobs on the

reins, and loops to hold to--a true example of the days when it took

absolute defiance to be a sporting-man. Furniss himself drove the

best-looking motor-car in Fitchly, and his effect was esthetically

better than his father’s, for, owing to the rigidity of the thing, it

is much easier to have a good taste in motor-cars than in horses. His

mother was a blonde, expensively-dressed woman of the type which goes

through life in the hideous belief that tight-lacing will make feminine

obesity anything but revolting.

Yet at twenty-five Furniss had had his chances. He went to college

and played foot-ball. He played it well. It is frequently the noblest

thing that men of his stamp ever do, except one. They sometimes get

into the army, and into the cavalry; less frequently into the infantry,

but never, absolutely never, into the engineers. It was, moreover, the

heyday of the college athlete, those golden years of the nineties when

men wore huge white Y’s and H’s on high-necked sweaters at mountain

resorts all summer, and when reputations lasted more than a year.

With one of these reputations Furniss had come out of college, and

tentatively, against its judgment, Fitchly had received him. It was one

of those inconceivable cases when reason and instinct battle. Everybody

knew old man Furniss and had not the slightest illusions about him;

yet here was young Furniss a half-back at Yale! Time has helped us to

understand these things nowadays, but they troubled us then.

In Furniss’s case reason won over instinct, and Fitchly received him

with open arms which wavered slightly. The only return he made was to

fall mildly in love with Helen Witherspoon. It would be nice to think

that something in the sweet, old-fashioned manner of this dainty,

refined girl, whose ancestors had been immigrants two hundred years

before Furniss’s, appealed to the brute and barbaric in the foot-ball

hero, and perhaps it did, but a more plausible reason for his falling

in love with her was that every one else was doing it. It was the

temptation of the desired, the invitation of a contest, and of all

things this appealed most to Furniss. Every one was doing it; but in a

very short time it narrowed down to Furniss and Butley Smith, of the

well-known legal firm of Smith, Smith & Smith, which drew up the city

charter and refused to accept criminal practice. She married Smith.

You could hardly call it a disappointed love-affair. It was rather

precision by elimination, and Furniss was eliminated. Furnisses were

all right as half-backs, but we didn’t marry them in Fitchly; at least

Father and Mother Witherspoon didn’t marry them, and in Fitchly they

did the marrying.

From Furniss’s point of view it was unfortunate, but it was natural. As

an economic system, marriage did not wholly persuade him, anyway.

So Furniss reverted to type, and did well at it. He lost little of his

athletic good looks, and he was certainly invaluable as a club-man.

Thirty-five found him stocky, but not fat, with a face rather round,

but not repellent; a tiny, trim mustache; the inevitable blue serge

and that almost offensively white linen which one associates with the

broker type--that whiteness which threatens to, but does not quite,

suggest scented soap. It would have been extremely difficult to say

whether or not he had brains. His achievements rather pointed to the

fact that he had, and his tastes to the fact that he had not; but, in

any case, he made money, and whatever might be his misdeeds, he never

bothered any one by telling about them. He manufactured in quantity the

best off-set drill in America, and furthermore, as he held the patents,

the wholesale jobbers who bought the drill troubled not one whit with

his morals. The society of Fitchly shook its head occasionally, but on

the whole kept him along. It would be extremely difficult to drop a man

who had nowhere to drop to; and as he asked nothing of Fitchly, there

was nothing to refuse. This occasion at the Country Club, then, was

the first real instance in which the elements had come in conflict.

Of the many mixed emotions which accompanied the premature withdrawal

from the Country Club that night, only two will suffice for

illustration, as they marked the extremes--those of Furniss himself

and of Butley Smith, the Menelaus of the ravished Helen. Those of

Furniss, indeed, were no doubt very similar to the emotions of the son

of Priam himself on the occasion of the original Hellenic uprising--an

amusing incident and an unfortunate one, but why this unseemly outcry?

His kissing some one when the lights went out had been a perfectly

consistent act. It was not an emotional impulse; it was, in a way, a

duty to the conventions, and how was he to know that the recipient was

a former sweetheart? He had no desire to repeat the crime. The attitude

of the Country Club had made osculation rather nauseous. It would seem

better breeding not to notice it; and yet, and yet, it was rather funny

that it should have been Helen. It was the first personal illustration

which Furniss had ever had of the dramatic, and he began to ponder. If

you ever wish to reclaim a devil, just try him on the dramatic. It is

the only uplifting influence which sleeps in the souls of most of them.

The emotions of Butley Smith were less happily chosen. He also felt the

impulse of the drama, but his was the stiff and unnatural drama of the

classic schools, for his cue directed him to punch in the face of the

offending Furniss. It was a glowing idea, but it wasn’t practical, as

associates of Butley brutally pointed out when they drew attention to

the fact that the face of the ex-half-back, and the present associate

of half the prize-fighters in the East, would be an extremely hard one

to pummel, and their logic suggests an admirable course of action for

one who would play a dramatic part in such histories. If you must be an

outraged husband, be one in a novel or a play, where you will always

be able to thrash or horsewhip or shoot the villain within an inch

of his life. The physical incapacity of villains in these circles is

admirable. In real life, unfortunately, they are quite apt to be fully

the equals of the outraged husband, or otherwise the husbands would be

less frequently outraged.

The probabilities of this situation were easily comprehended by a legal

mind which spurned a criminal practice, and Butley Smith had to take

his satisfaction in biding his time, reserving, however, the privilege

of biting his lip, to which extent he lived up to the unities. Meantime

the situation in Fitchly did not improve.

Just how bad the situation was growing, just how fitfully the pot was

boiling, how it was even fanned by his own disregard of it, was utterly

aside from the observation of Furniss. He never knew, for example,

and probably would not have cared if he did, that there had been a

proposition to expel him from the Fitchly Country Club. But, then, as

was pointed out by Carter of the firm of Carter, Pills & Carter, who

did take an occasional criminal case, if an action were instituted

against Furniss, it must necessarily involve the guileless Helen, and,

whatever might be the popular verdict, just how much she could be

called an accomplice would be a decision extremely delicate for the

trained legal mind. It was certain that Furniss’s face had borne no

scratches when the lights went on again.

So Butley boiled and chafed under his natural injunction against

punching Furniss, and bit his lip, and bided his time, until ultimately

it began to react on Helen, whose original emotions had been as simple

as those of the criminal. He boiled and chafed and bided his time until

the desperate Helen resolved on a terrible step--no less than an actual

move to the walls of Ilium. She wrote a note, and invited Furniss to

meet her in the private dining-room of the Fitchly Inn.

He went. We will not flatter Furniss. Any note in a feminine

handwriting would have brought him just the same, and his mood was not

of the most elevated. His dim, uncertain stirrings of the dramatic on

the morning of the thirty-first had gone permanently back to sleep, and

on this particular day he had reasons to be distinctly savage, for he

had just lost a forty-thousand-dollar order for the off-set drill, and

he had no active inclinations toward mushrooms. Still, business was

business, and one had to buy luncheon for two, anyway.

So Helen met him, and Helen pleaded. Aside from the boiling of Butley,

her feminine sense of the just had told her that wrong must be

righted and happy endings must prevail. She had not the rude melodrama

of her consort, which saw a trouncing as the only fit remedy for

non-patrons of husbandry; but she had, nevertheless, an Emersonian

theory of compensation, which perceived that the apparent impunity of

the outrager was contrary to the ultimate laws of existence. So Helen

pleaded, and Paris got mad. He didn’t like Butley, anyway. He would

apologize to Helen, but he wouldn’t to Menelaus. He couldn’t see that

the affair was international, anyway. It seemed to him distinctly

Parisian. But Helen wore a tailored gown with a fringe of lace at her

neck, so Paris surrendered, and the entente cordiale was restored.

He promised to apologize at the Quoits Club that very day, and that

evening, at a prearranged dinner, the nations would banquet in harmony.

Seven stalwart oxen would be killed, a libation poured to the gods, and

for seven hours--

But just then the waiter brought the bill.

The bill, with tips, was twenty-four dollars and sixty cents, and with

a sudden recollection of the forty-thousand-dollar order, Furniss

reverted to type. With the usual inconsistency of a man who can lose

large sums with apparent indifference, he raved and fumed at the loss

of a penny. He raved and fumed all the afternoon at his office, and it

was not until well after five that he made an unaccustomed appearance

at the Quoits Club, still raging and fuming, with the only horror that

a man of his type can ever know--the horror of losing money.

Butley Smith was already at the Quoits Club, as Helen well knew

he would be; but Furniss was an unaccustomed presence. He usually

preferred the Racquets, where the stakes were worth playing, and his

advent in this, the stronghold of strictly civil practice, made a

commotion. The commotion, moreover, soon attracted the attention of

Butley, who was straying through the tables looking for a partner.

Now, Butley Smith was rated a magnificent card-player, which meant that

he played auction like a stop-watch, and poker like a two-year-old

child. The exact opposite was true, by reputation, of Furniss, and at

sight of him in the stronghold of his own followers, who demanded his

redemption, Butley had a sudden golden inspiration. He ceased biting

his lip, and his time was bid. He would beard the lion in his den, and

beard him he did.

“Furniss,” he said, “are you busy?”

Furniss looked up in perplexity.

“Suppose,” continued Butley, “that we throw a few hands of poker.”

Butley was right. With Furniss of Fitchly that was indeed an audacious

suggestion to give, but, brooding on the circumstances of the last

two months, in the minds of the Quoits Club it instantly assumed

Homeric proportions. The turn of a card, the fall of a die, a woman’s

honor--there was a romance about it that struck clear home to their

devilishness; a veritable thrill went among them. Only Furniss was

mystified; but, then, he was a devil, and naturally did not know how it

felt to be devilish. But he saw light--his own light, a light that is

not on land or sea, only in the waters under the earth.

“I’m on,” he said, and Butley dealt.

In a crowded club-room at five o’clock in the afternoon a two-handed

game would ordinarily have been a monstrosity, but this was no

ordinary contest. It was a fight to the very death, and without a word

the spectators gathered at the only points where it is proper for

spectators to gather in a poker-game--without a word and without a

suggestion to join.

I want to do justice to that game, but the truth is that Butley did not

win a single hand--or just one in the early part.

“I raise you four,” said Furniss as the clock struck six.

Butley glanced at his hand.

“It’s yours,” he said sadly, and regretfully laid down three jacks,

while Furniss rapidly shuffled an ace high into the pack and looked at

his watch.

The Century Illustrated Monthly Magazine, October, 1913 Vol. LXXXVI. New Series: Vol. LXIV. May to October, 1913 · 第 13 / 18 章