TUSCAN ORDER.

[Illustration]

This, as already stated, is not entitled to rank as a distinct Order,

being, in fact, nothing more than a simplified, if not a spurious

and debased variety of the Doric. No authentic examples of it exist:

it is known only from what Vitruvius says of it, following whose

imperfect account, modern writers and architects have endeavoured to

make out something answering to it. Yet what has been so produced is

to all intents and purposes Doric,—though not Grecian Doric,—excepting

that the shafts are unfluted and the frieze quite plain; which last

circumstance, and much more, as has just above been intimated, is

a mere trifling discrepancy, since not the triglyphs merely, but

the frieze may, it seems, be omitted without thereby forfeiting the

character of Doric for the Order. Though the Tuscan is spoken of, it

is not practised. Almost the only example of what is called by that

name in this country is Inigo Jones’s portico of St. Paul’s, Covent

Garden, which, though not devoid of character and effect, is remarkable

chiefly for the great width of the intercolumns, and the great

projection of its very shallow, and therefore too shelf-like cornice,

which, if no other part, must be admitted to differ widely from the

comparatively slightly projecting and massive Doric cornice. The Tuscan

has, however, been treated differently by different Architects, and

some of them have given it what is merely a modification of the Doric

cornice without its mutules. Their Tuscan becomes, in fact, very little

more than a plainer sort of their own Doric, distinguished from it

chiefly, and that only negatively, by the omission of triglyphs on the

frieze. One thing which the Moderns have done, both in their Doric

and their Tuscan, is to assimilate pilasters to columns, giving to

the former precisely the same bases and capitals as the others have,

and also generally diminishing their shafts in the same manner. Still

all the differences here pointed out, together with many minor ones

besides, do not constitute different Orders, unless they are to be

multiplied by being subdivided into almost as many distinct Orders as

there are varieties of one and the same class. All the Dorics and the

Tuscan agree in having the _echino-abacus capital_. Therefore, if we

want a quite different and distinct Order, we must turn, as we now do,

to the _voluted-capital_ class of columns, or that which bears the name

of the

Rudimentary Architecture for the Use of Beginners The Orders and Their Æsthetic Principles · 第 14 / 24 题