II

First of all, I found myself thinking about a delightful revery by M.

Anatole France, in which he says that if he had been the Demiurge, he

would have put youth at the end of life instead of at the beginning,

and would have otherwise so ordered matters that every human being

should have three stages of development, somewhat corresponding to

those of the lepidoptera. Then it occurred to me that this fantasy was

in substance scarcely more than the delicate modification of a most

ancient doctrine, common to nearly all the higher forms of religion.

Western faiths especially teach that our life on earth is a larval

state of greedy helplessness, and that death is a pupa-sleep out of

which we should soar into everlasting light. They tell us that during

its sentient existence, the outer body should be thought of only as a

kind of caterpillar, and thereafter as a chrysalis;—and they aver that

we lose or gain, according to our behavior as larvæ, the power to

develop wings under the mortal wrapping. Also they tell us not to

trouble ourselves about the fact that we see no Psyché-imago detach

itself from the broken cocoon: this lack of visual evidence signifies

nothing, because we have only the purblind vision of grubs. Our eyes

are but half-evolved. Do not whole scales of colors invisibly exist

above and below the limits of our retinal sensibility? Even so the

butterfly-man exists,—although, as a matter of course, we cannot see

him.

But what would become of this human imago in a state of perfect bliss?

From the evolutional point of view the question has interest; and its

obvious answer was suggested to me by the history of those

silkworms,—which have been domesticated for only a few thousand years.

Consider the result of our celestial domestication for—let us

say—several millions of years: I mean the final consequence, to the

wishers, of being able to gratify every wish at will.

Those silkworms have all that they wish for,—even considerably more.

Their wants, though very simple, are fundamentally identical with the

necessities of mankind,—food, shelter, warmth, safety, and comfort. Our

endless social struggle is mainly for these things. Our dream of heaven

is the dream of obtaining them free of cost in pain; and the condition

of those silkworms is the realization, in a small way, of our imagined

Paradise. (I am not considering the fact that a vast majority of the

worms are predestined to torment and the second death; for my theme is

of heaven, not of lost souls. I am speaking of the elect—those worms

preördained to salvation and rebirth.) Probably they can feel only very

weak sensations: they are certainly incapable of prayer. But if they

were able to pray, they could not ask for anything more than they

already receive from the youth who feeds and tends them. He is their

providence,—a god of whose existence they can be aware in only the

vaguest possible way, but just such a god as they require. And we

should foolishly deem ourselves fortunate to be equally well cared-for

in proportion to our more complex wants. Do not our common forms of

prayer prove our desire for like attention? Is not the assertion of our

“need of divine love” an involuntary confession that we wish to be

treated like silkworms,—to live without pain by the help of gods? Yet

if the gods were to treat us as we want, we should presently afford

fresh evidence,—in the way of what is called “the evidence from

degeneration,”—that the great evolutional law is far above the gods.

An early stage of that degeneration would be represented by total

incapacity to help ourselves;—then we should begin to lose the use of

our higher sense-organs;—later on, the brain would shrink to a

vanishing pin-point of matter;—still later we should dwindle into mere

amorphous sacs, mere blind stomachs. Such would be the physical

consequence of that kind of divine love which we so lazily wish for.

The longing for perpetual bliss in perpetual peace might well seem a

malevolent inspiration from the Lords of Death and Darkness. All life

that feels and thinks has been, and can continue to be, only as the

product of struggle and pain,—only as the outcome of endless battle

with the Powers of the Universe. And cosmic law is uncompromising.

Whatever organ ceases to know pain,—whatever faculty ceases to be used

under the stimulus of pain,—must also cease to exist. Let pain and its

effort be suspended, and life must shrink back, first into protoplasmic

shapelessness, thereafter into dust.

Buddhism—which, in its own grand way, is a doctrine of

evolution—rationally proclaims its heaven but a higher stage of

development through pain, and teaches that even in paradise the

cessation of effort produces degradation. With equal reasonableness it

declares that the capacity for pain in the superhuman world increases

always in proportion to the capacity for pleasure. (There is little

fault to be found with this teaching from a scientific

standpoint,—since we know that higher evolution must involve an

increase of sensitivity to pain.) In the Heavens of Desire, says the

_Shōbō-nen-jō-kyō_, the pain of death is so great that all the agonies

of all the hells united could equal but one-sixteenth part of such

pain.[1]

[1] This statement refers only to the Heavens of Sensuous

Pleasure,—not to the Paradise of Amida, nor to those heavens into

which one enters by the Apparitional Birth. But even in the highest

and most immaterial zones of being,—in the Heavens of

Formlessness,—the cessation of effort and of the pain of effort,

involves the penalty of rebirth in a lower state of existence.

The foregoing comparison is unnecessarily strong; but the Buddhist

teaching about heaven is in substance eminently logical. The

suppression of pain—mental or physical,—in any conceivable state of

sentient existence, would necessarily involve the suppression also of

pleasure;—and certainly all progress, whether moral or material,

depends upon the power to meet and to master pain. In a

silkworm-paradise such as our mundane instincts lead us to desire, the

seraph freed from the necessity of toil, and able to satisfy his every

want at will, would lose his wings at last, and sink back to the

condition of a grub….

In Ghostly Japan · 第 17 / 68 题