THE THREE PREDECESSORS OF ŚÂKYAMUNI IN THE BUDDHASHIP.
Fifty le to the west of the city bring (the traveller) to a town named
Too-wei,[1] the birthplace of Kâśyapa Buddha.[1] At the place where he
and his father met,[2] and at that where he attained to pari-nirvâṇa,
topes were erected. Over the entire relic of the whole body of him,
the Kâśyapa Tathâgata,[3] a great tope was also erected.
Going on south-east from the city of Śrâvastî for twelve yojanas,
(the travellers) came to a town named Na-pei-keâ,[4] the birthplace of
Krakuchanda Buddha.[5] At the place where he and his father met, and
at that where he attained to pari-nirvâṇa, topes were erected. Going
north from here less than a yojana, they came to a town which had been
the birthplace of Kanakamuni Buddha.[5] At the place where he and his
father met, and where he attained to pari-nirvâṇa, topes were erected.
NOTES
[1] Identified, as Beal says, by Cunningham with Tadwa, a village nine
miles to the west of Sâhara-mahat. The birthplace of Kâśyapa Buddha is
generally thought to have been Benâres. According to a calculation of
Rémusat, from his birth to A.D. 1832 there were 1,992,859 years!
[2] It seems to be necessary to have a meeting between every Buddha
and his father. One at least is ascribed to Śâkyamuni and his father
(real or supposed) Śuddhodana.
[3] This is the highest epithet given to every supreme Buddha; in
Chinese 如來, meaning, as Eitel, p. 147 says, ‘Sic profectus
sum.’ It is equivalent to ‘Rightful Buddha, the true successor in
the Supreme Buddha Line.’ Hardy concludes his account of the Kâśyapa
Buddha (M. B., p. 97) with the following sentence:—‘After his
body was burnt, the bones still remained in their usual position,
presenting the appearance of a perfect skeleton; and the whole of the
inhabitants of Jambudvîpa, assembling together, erected a dagoba over
his relics one yojana in height!’
[4] Na-pei-keâ or Nabhiga is not mentioned elsewhere. Eitel says this
Buddha was born at the city of Gân-ho (如和城) and Hardy gives
his birthplace as Mekhala. It may be possible, by means of Sanskrit,
to reconcile these statements.
[5] See chap. xvii note 19.