CHAPTER III.

A CRAB CHAPTER.

Mr. Pierce and those about him had clearly indicated by the

conversation, or rather monologue, already recorded, that Peter was in

a sense an odd number in the “Sunrise’s” complement of

pleasure-seekers. Whether or no Mr. Pierce’s monologue also indicated

that he was not a map who dealt in odd numbers, or showered hospitality

on sons of mill-overseers, the fact was nevertheless true. “For value

received,” or “I hereby promise to pay,” were favorite formulas of Mr.

Pierce, and if not actually written in such invitations as he permitted

his wife to write at his dictation to people whom he decided should be

bidden to the Shrubberies, a longer or shorter time would develop the

words, as if written in sympathetic ink. Yet Peter had had as pressing

an invitation and as warm a welcome at Mr. Pierce’s country place as

had any of the house-party ingathered during the first week of July.

Clearly something made him of value to the owner of the Shrubberies.

That something was his chum, Watts D’Alloi.

Peter and Watts were such absolute contrasts that it seemed impossible

that they could have an interest or sympathy, in common. Therefore they

had become chums. A chance in their freshman year had brought them

together. Watts, with the refined and delicate sense of humor abounding

in collegians, had been concerned with sundry freshmen in an attempt to

steal (or, in collegiate terms, “rag”) the chapel Bible, with a view to

presenting it to some equally subtle humorists at Yale, expecting a

similar courtesy in return from that college. Unfortunately for the

joke, the college authorities had had the bad taste to guard against

the annually attempted substitution. Two of the marauders were caught,

while Watts only escaped by leaving his coat in the hands of the

watchers. Even then he would have been captured had he not met Peter in

his flight, and borrowed the latter’s coat, in which he reached his

room without detection. Peter was caught by the pursuers, and summoned

before the faculty, but he easily proved that the captured coat was not

his, and that he had but just parted from one of the tutors, making it

certain that he could not have been an offender. There was some talk of

expelling him for aiding and abetting in the true culprit’s escape, and

for refusing to tell who it was. Respect for his motives, however, and

his unimpeachable record saved him from everything but an admonition

from the president, which changed into a discussion of cotton printing

before that august official had delivered half of his intended rebuke.

People might not enthuse over Peter, but no one ever quarrelled with

him. So the interview, after travelling from cotton prints to spring

radishes, ended with a warm handshake, and a courteous suggestion that

he come again when there should be no charges nor admonitions to go

through with. Watts told him that he was a “devilish lucky” fellow to

have been on hand to help, for Peter had proved his pluck to his class,

had made a friend of the president and, as Watts considerately put it:

“but for your being on the corner at 11:10 that evening, old chap,

you’d never have known me.” Truly on such small chances do the greatest

events of our life turn. Perhaps, could Peter have looked into the

future, he would have avoided that corner. Perhaps, could he have

looked even further, he would have found that in that chance lay the

greatest happiness of his life. Who can tell, when the bitter comes,

and we later see how we could have avoided it, what we should have

encountered in its place? Who can tell, when sweet comes, how far it is

sweetened by the bitterness that went before? Dodging the future in

this world is a success equal to that of the old woman who triumphantly

announced that she had borrowed money enough to pay all her debts.

As a matter of course Watts was grateful for the timely assistance, and

was not slow either to say or show it. He told his own set of fellows

that he was “going to take that Stirling up and make him one of us,”

and Watts had a remarkable way of doing what he chose. At first Peter

did not respond to the overtures and insistance of the handsome,

well-dressed, free-spending, New York swell. He was too conscious of

the difference between himself and Watts’s set, to wish or seek

identification with them. But no one who ever came under Watts’s

influence could long stand out against his sunny face and frank manner,

and so Peter eventually allowed himself to be “taken up.” Perhaps the

resistance encountered only whetted Watts’s intention. He was certainly

aided by Peter’s isolation. Whether the cause was single or multiple,

Peter was soon in a set from which many a seemingly far more eligible

fellow was debarred.

Strangely enough, it did not change him perceptibly. He still plodded

on conscientiously at his studies, despite laughter and attempts to

drag him away from them. He still lived absolutely within the

comfortable allowance that his mother gave him. He still remained the

quiet, serious looking fellow of yore. The “gang,” as they styled

themselves, called him “kill-joy,” “graveyard,” or “death’s head,” in

their evening festivities, but Peter only puffed at his pipe

good-naturedly, making no retort, and if the truth had really been

spoken, not a man would have changed him a particle. His silence and

seriousness added the dash of contrast needed to make the evening

perfect. All joked him. The most popular verse in a class-song Watts

wrote, was devoted to burlesquing his soberness, the gang never tiring

of singing at all hours and places:

“Goodness gracious! Who’s that in the ‘yard’ a yelling in the rain?

That’s the boy who never gave his mother any pain,

But now his moral character is sadly on the wane,

’Tis little Peter Stirling, bilin’ drunk again.

Oh, the Sunday-school boy,

His mamma’s only joy,

Is shouting drunk as usual, and raising Cain!”

Yet joke Peter as they would, in every lark, be it drive, sail, feed,

drink, or smoke, whoever’s else absence was commented upon, his never

passed unnoticed.

In Sophomore year, Watts, without quite knowing why, proposed that they

should share rooms. Nor would he take Peter’s refusal, and eventually

succeeded in reversing it.

“I can’t afford your style of living,” Peter had said quietly, as his

principal objection.

“Oh, I’ll foot the bills for the fixings, so it shan’t cost you a cent

more,” said Watts, and when Peter had finally been won over to give his

assent, Watts had supposed it was on this uneven basis. But in the end,

the joint chambers were more simply furnished than those of the rest of

the gang, who promptly christened them “the hermitage,” and Peter had

paid his half of the expense. And though he rarely had visitors of his

own asking at the chambers, all cost of wine and tobacco was equally

borne by him.

The three succeeding years welded very strong bands round these two. It

was natural that they should modify each other strongly, but in truth,

as in most cases, when markedly different characteristics are brought

in contact, the only effect was to accentuate each in his

peculiarities. Peter dug at his books all the harder, by reason of

Watts’s neglect of them. Watts became the more free-handed with his

money because of Peter’s prudence. Watts talked more because of Peter’s

silence, and Peter listened more because of Watts’s talk. Watts, it is

true, tried to drag Peter into society, yet in truth, Peter was really

left more alone than if he had been rooming with a less social fellow.

Each had in truth become the complement of the other, and seemed as

mutually necessary as the positive and negative wires in electricity.

Peter, who had been taking the law lectures in addition to the regular

academic course, and had spent his last two summers reading law in an

attorney’s office, in his native town, taking the New York examination

in the previous January, had striven to get Watts to do the same, with

the ultimate intention of their hanging out a joint legal shingle in

New York.

“I’ll see the clients, and work up the cases, Watts, and you’ll make

the speeches and do the social end,” said Peter, making a rather long

speech in the ardor of his wishes.

Watts laughed. “I don’t know, old man. I rather fancy I shan’t do

anything. To do something requires that one shall make up one’s mind

what to do, and that’s such devilish hard work. I’ll wait till I’ve

graduated, and had a chin with my governor about it Perhaps he’ll make

up my mind for me, and so save my brain tissue. But anyway, you’ll come

to New York, and start in, for you must be within reach of me. Besides,

New York’s the only place in this country worth living in.”

Such were the relations between the two at graduation time. Watts, who

had always prepared his lessons in a tenth part of the time it had

taken Peter, buckled down in the last few weeks, and easily won an

honorable mention. Peter had tried hard to win honors, but failed.

“You did too much outside work, old man,” said Watts, who would

cheerfully have given his own triumph to his friend. “If you want

success in anything, you’ve got to sacrifice other things and

concentrate on the object. The Mention’s really not worth the ink it’s

written with, in my case, but I knew it would please mammy and pappy,

so I put on steam, and got it. If I’d hitched on a lot of freight cars

loaded with stuff that wouldn’t have told in Exams, I never could have

been in on time.”

Peter shook his head rather sadly. “You outclass me in brains, Watts,

as much as you do in other things”

“Nonsense,” said Watts. “I haven’t one quarter of your head. But my

ancestors—here’s to the old coves—have been brain-culturing for three

hundred years, while yours have been land-culturing; and of course my

brain moves quicker and easier than yours. I take to a book, by

hereditary instinct, as a duck to water, while you are like a yacht,

which needs a heap of building and fitting before she can do the same.

But you’ll beat me in the long run, as easily as the boat does the

duck. And the Honor’s nothing.”

“Except, as you said, to one’s”—Peter hesitated for a moment, divided

in mind by his wish to quote accurately, and his dislike of anything

disrespectful, and then finished “to one’s mother.”

“That’s the last person it’s needed for, chum,” replied Watts. “If

there’s one person that doesn’t need the world’s or faculty’s opinion

to prove one’s merit, it’s one’s dear, darling, doating, self-deluded

and undisillusioned mamma. Heigh-ho. I’ll be with mine two weeks from

now, after we’ve had our visit at the Pierces’. I’m jolly glad you are

going, old man. It will be a sort of tapering-off time for the summer’s

separation. I don’t see why you insist on starting in at once in New

York? No one does any law business in the summertime. Why, I even think

the courts are closed. Come, you’d better go on to Grey-Court with me,

and try it, at least. My mammy will kill the fatted calf for you in

great style.”

“We’ve settled that once,” said Peter, who was evidently speaking

journalistically, for he had done the settling.

Watts said something in a half-articulate way, which certainly would

have fired the blood of every dime museum-keeper in the country, had

they been there to hear the conversation, for, as well as could be

gathered from the mumbling, it related to a “pig-headed donkey” known

of to the speaker. “I suppose you’ll be backing out of the Pierce

affair yet,” he added, discontentedly.

“No,” said Peter.

“An invitation to Grey-Court is worth two of the Shrubberies. My mother

knows only the right kind of people, while Mr. Pierce—”

“Is to be our host,” interrupted Peter, but with no shade of correction

in his voice.

“Yes,” laughed Watts, “and he is a host. He’ll not let any one else get

a word in edgewise. You are just the kind of talker he’ll like. Mark my

word, he’ll be telling every one, before you’ve been two hours in the

house, that you are a remarkably brilliant conversationalist.”

“What will he say of you?” said Peter, in a sentence which he broke up

into reasonable lengths by a couple of pulls at his pipe in the middle

of it.

“Mr. Pierce, chum,” replied Watts, with a look in his eyes which Peter

had learned to associate with mischief on Watts’s part, “has too great

an affection for yours truly to object to anything I do. Do you

suppose, if I hadn’t been sure of my footing at the Shrubberies, that I

should have dared to ask an invitation for”—then Watts hesitated for a

moment, seeing a half-surprised, half-anxious look come into Peter’s

face, “for myself?” he continued.

“Tell truth and shame the devil,” said Peter.

Watts laughed. “Confound you! That’s what comes of letting even such a

stupid old beggar as you learn to read one’s thoughts. It’s mighty

ungrateful of you to use them against me. Yes. I did ask to have you

included in the party. But you needn’t put your back up, Mr.

Unbendable, and think you were forced on them. Mr. Pierce gave me

_carte blanche_, and if it hadn’t been you, it would have been some

other donkey.”

“But Mrs. Pierce?” queried Peter.

“Oh,” explained Watts, “of course Mrs. Pierce wrote the letter. I

couldn’t do it in my name, and so Mr. Pierce told her to do it. They’re

very land of me, old man, because my governor is the largest

stockholder, and a director in Mr. P.’s bank, and I was told I could

bring down some fellows next week for a few days’ jollity. I didn’t

care to do that, but of course I wouldn’t have omitted you for any

amount of ducats.”

Which explanation solves the mystery of Peter’s presence at the

Shrubberies. To understand his face we must trace the period between

his arrival and the moment this story begins.

The Honorable Peter Stirling and What People Thought of Him · 第 3 / 61 章