CHAPTER XI

_What Ireland Wants_

Before I went to Ireland I imagined the Irish standing in a crowd with

their right hands pointing to heaven and all of them demanding home

rule. But talk about shades of opinion and political differences at

home, why, it's nothing to the mixture here.

I meet a man to-day and as I shake his hand I tell him with heartfelt

sympathy that I hope he'll get home rule, that most of us are with him

in the United States, and he wrings my hand and tells me that American

sympathy is the thing that has kept Ireland up.

My bosom swells with pride and I feel that I have hit on just the

right phrase to use.

Next day I meet another Irishman, a Protestant from Belfast, and as I

wring his hand with emotional fervor, I tell him that I hope he'll get

home rule, and he pulls his hand from my grasp to bring it down on

desk or counter or table with impetuosity, as he says, "Ireland

doesn't want home rule. If the phrase had never been coined Ireland

would be happy to-day. What Ireland wants is less sympathy from

outsiders. If my child bumps his head and begins to cry, I say, 'Sure

it's nothing. Brave boys like to bump their heads,' and he begins to

laugh and forgets about it. But if a stranger says, 'Poor Patsy. It

must hurt awfully,' then he sets up a howl about it and fancies he's

injured. What Ireland needs is to forget her troubles and her

political disabilities and work. An Irish workingman in Ireland is the

laziest man alive. When he goes to America or Canada or Australia and

is released from priestly authority he's a hard worker and a success,

but Paddy in the fields is always looking for saints' days--and

finding them--and when he finds them he takes a holiday."

I am silent because I really know so little about it, but next day I

meet another Protestant and I say to him, "I suppose it's Rome rule

that is killing Ireland?"

He's up in the air at once and tells me that it is the priests who are

interesting the peasants in the revival of industries long dormant.

"Aren't the priests fine-looking men?" says he.

"Yes," breaks in another Irishman, "and they ought to be the fathers

of families. All that good blood going to waste and their lines ending

with them instead of enriching the blood of Ireland in future

generations. That's what celibacy does."

Another Irishman chimes in, "Oh, the priests are not such a fine lot.

The constabulary are, I'll admit, but the most of them are as useless

as the priests. Most of their time is spent training canaries, for

there's little else for them to do in the country districts. But the

priests; sure a man says, 'Oh, Jimmy's no good at all at all. Let's

make a priest of him.'"

"It's folly you're talking," says the one who spoke for the priests.

"There's not a finer body of men in Ireland than the priests."

"Oh," says the other, with Irish wit, "there's white sheep in every

fold, I'll admit, but if Ireland was free from political and religious

domination, she'd be able to stand upright and she wouldn't need home

rule."

All of which is very perplexing to the man who came to Ireland

thinking that with the exception of a few Orangemen all Ireland was

working morning, noon, and night for home rule.

Next day I meet a man I know to be a Protestant and I say to him in my

easy-going way (being all things to all men when I am traveling, in

order to save wear and tear), "The Catholic religion is keeping

Ireland back, is it not?"

He looks at me for a moment and then a spiritual light illumines his

eyes and he says: "Protestantism is always death to arts. Look at

Shakespeare, the last Catholic that England had, as you might say, and

look at his work with its artistry, its absence of dogmatism, and then

look at Protestant and tiresome Wordsworth and Protestant and didactic

Tennyson. Spenser was a great artist. Spenser was a Catholic.

Catholicism emancipates the artistic side of a man's nature,

puritanism seals it up, dams it, condemns him to preach sermons.

"The Irish are the most artistic people on the face of the earth when

Protestantism has not been allowed to stamp their idealism out of

them."

"But I thought you were a Protestant. Then I suppose that you think

that the priests----"

"I think that the priests ought never to be allowed to tamper with

education. Spiritually they release Irishmen from puritan fetters (I

speak as a Protestant and the son of a Protestant) but politically and

educationally they are millstones about Ireland's neck."

I leave him and going to Hibernia Hall in Dublin, where the work of

Irish industries is being displayed, and where stands temporarily St.

Gaudens's splendid statue of Parnell, and I see there Augustine

Birrell, whom I believe to be one of Ireland's warmest and truest

friends.

I am talking to a handsome six-foot priest.

"Ah, there's Birrell," I say to him.

"Yes," says he with a twinkle in his Irish eyes, "'twould be a fine

chance to drop a little dynamite under him."

I leave the hall hurriedly and listen outside for the explosion,

meanwhile wondering why a priest who wants home rule hates Birrell,

who has tried to give Ireland a modified version of it.

I meet a literary Catholic and ask him whether home rule would mean

Rome rule and he tells me that it would not; that the Catholics would

not stand for priestly interference with politics; that the priests

themselves would not desire to interfere.

Next day I ask a jarvey if he wants home rule and he says, "Begorry,

higher wages would be better. I'd not be botherin' with home rule if

there was enough to keep me sons busy."

"Well, Michael, would home rule mean Rome rule?"

"Sure it would. Isn't the pope the head of the church?"

Ireland seems to be a house divided against itself.

I like the father of the family very much. We'll say he comes from the

south of Ireland and is a Catholic. He's a witty man, a hospitable

man, a cheery man, but won't speak to his oldest son, because he's a

Belfast Unionist and believes in letting well enough alone.

[Illustration: LOST IN HIS LUNCH, MALLOW, COUNTY KERRY]

Now the eldest son is a delightful fellow. A little more reserved than

his southern father, but just as hospitable, just as cheery--almost as

witty. The mother is a Sinn Feiner, an idealist of the idealists. She

believes that Irishmen ought to withdraw from Parliament. She urges

her son, who is in Parliament, to resign, to boycott England, to get

his brother members of Parliament to come home and form a National

Council in Dublin. She doesn't believe in war, but she hates England

with an animosity that is positively amusing to one whose forbears

fought England and had done with the fight long ago. She won't speak

to her daughter, who believes in working for home rule in season and

out of season in London.

The mother is witty and cheery, and, oh, so hospitable, but when I

visit the daughter I don't mention the old lady to her, for in spite

of the ingrained love for parents that is almost as strong in an

Irishman as it is in a Chinaman, she says very sharp things about her

unpractical mother. But when we leave politics alone, she is cheery

and witty, and always as hospitable as she can be.

Now, if by means of arousing a truly national spirit (and the Gaelic

League is going about it in the right way) this family of witty and

cheery and hospitable people can be induced to sink minor differences

and act together they'll get what they want--whatever that is. And

then won't they be the happy family?

And I'm sure I do hope with all my heart that they'll get it.

For they won't be happy till they get it.

Just Irish · 第 11 / 13 章