MARCH.

6.--The respective merits of the new iron ploughs introduced by Messrs.

Ransomes and Sims, of Ipswich, and of the common Norfolk plough, were

tested on Messrs. Salter's farm at Attleborough. "In their lightness and

symmetry the former presented a strong contrast. The Norfolk plough drew

nearly half as heavy again as the iron ploughs, or in the proportion of 3

to 2 in the shallow work, and in the deep work one quarter heavier, or in

the proportion of 4 to 5."

10.--A remarkable incident occurred at Lakenham church. A wedding had

been arranged, and the Rev. C. Baldwin, of St. Stephen's, Norwich, had

promised, with the approbation of the vicar, the Rev. A. Pownall, to

officiate. When the wedding party arrived at Lakenham, they found the

church closed. An entrance was effected, but the vestry was locked, and

neither surplice nor books were provided for the clergyman. "It was

suggested that a sheet should be borrowed, and the Rev. Mr. Baldwin,

habited in this novel vestment, proceeded to unite the parties in the

bonds of matrimony, and after having sent to the clergyman's house for

the parish registers, the happy couple were at length enabled to proceed

on their wedding trip. Mr. Pownall, who was himself the cause of the

whole difficulty, having forgotten to inform the clerk of the forthcoming

ceremony, issued the following extraordinary handbill:--'Lakenham church.

A solemn service will be held on Friday, the 24th inst., to avert the

wrath of Almighty God and to deprecate His righteous judgments in

consequence of the profanation of His sanctuary on Monday last . . .

Ezekiel v., 11.'" The incident gave rise to much comment.

15.--A great fire occurred at Frazer's sawmills, near St.

Martin-at-Palace church, Norwich, and resulted in the loss of about 4,000

worth of property.

18.--Died at North Walsham, Mary Doughty, aged 101 years.

28.--At the Norfolk Assizes, before Lord Chief Justice Cockburn, was

tried a remarkable action for assault, false imprisonment, and malicious

prosecution. The plaintiff, Mr. Albert Pell (son of Sir Albert Pell, of

Northamptonshire), with his brother, while on a visit to Yarmouth,

crossed the fields of the defendant, Mr. Mayes Wigg, at Caister. They

had with them a Skye terrier, and defendant, alleging that they were

poaching, gave them into the custody of a policeman, who, after detaining

them at his cottage, took them before a magistrate at Thrigby. The

charge was dismissed, whereupon the present action was commenced. The

jury found for the plaintiff on the first count, charging assault and

false imprisonment, and awarded damages 5; and for defendant on the

second count, charging malicious prosecution.

Norfolk Annals, Vol. 2 A Chronological Record of Remarkable Events in the Nineteeth Century · 第 174 / 605 题