THE REST OF THE EQUIPMENT

The author of the Plays was equipped, beyond every other man of his

time, with wisdom, erudition, imagination, capaciousness of mind,

grace, and majesty of expression. Every one has said it, no one doubts

it. Also, he had humor, humor in rich abundance, and always wanting to

break out. We have no evidence of any kind that Shakespeare of

Stratford possessed any of these gifts or any of these acquirements.

The only lines he ever wrote, so far as we know, are substantially

barren of them—barren of all of them.

Good friend for Iesus sake forbeare

To digg the dust encloased heare:

Blest be ye man yt spares thes stones

And curst be he yt moves my bones.

Ben Jonson says of Bacon, as orator:

His language, _where he could spare and pass by a jest_, was nobly

censorious. No man ever spoke more neatly, more pressly, more

weightily, or suffered less emptiness, less idleness, in what he

uttered. No member of his speech but consisted of his (its) own

graces.... The fear of every man that heard him was lest he should make

an end.

From Macaulay:

He continued to distinguish himself in Parliament, particularly by his

exertions in favor of one excellent measure on which the King’s heart

was set—the union of England and Scotland. It was not difficult for

such an intellect to discover many irresistible arguments in favor of

such a scheme. He conducted the great case of the _Post Nati_ in the

Exchequer Chamber; and the decision of the judges—a decision the

legality of which may be questioned, but the beneficial effect of which

must be acknowledged—was in a great measure attributed to his dexterous

management.

Again:

While actively engaged in the House of Commons and in the courts of

law, he still found leisure for letters and philosophy. The noble

treatise on the _Advancement Of Learning_, which at a later period was

expanded into the _De Augmentis_, appeared in 1605.

The _Wisdom Of The Ancients_, a work which, if it had proceeded from

any other writer, would have been considered as a masterpiece of wit

and learning, was printed in 1609.

In the mean time the _Novum Organum_ was slowly proceeding. Several

distinguished men of learning had been permitted to see portions of

that extraordinary book, and they spoke with the greatest admiration of

his genius.

Even Sir Thomas Bodley, after perusing the _Cogitata Et Visa_, one of

the most precious of those scattered leaves out of which the great

oracular volume was afterward made up, acknowledged that “in all

proposals and plots in that book, Bacon showed himself a master

workman”; and that “it could not be gainsaid but all the treatise over

did abound with choice conceits of the present state of learning, and

with worthy contemplations of the means to procure it.”

In 1612 a new edition of the _Essays_ appeared, with additions

surpassing the original collection both in bulk and quality.

Nor did these pursuits distract Bacon’s attention from a work the most

arduous, the most glorious, and the most useful that even his mighty

powers could have achieved, “the reducing and recompiling,” to use his

own phrase, “of the laws of England.”

To serve the exacting and laborious offices of Attorney-General and

Solicitor-General would have satisfied the appetite of any other man

for hard work, but Bacon had to add the vast literary industries just

described, to satisfy his. He was a born worker.

The service which he rendered to letters during the last five years of

his life, amid ten thousand distractions and vexations, increase the

regret with which we think on the many years which he had wasted, to

use the words of Sir Thomas Bodley, “on such study as was not worthy

such a student.”

He commenced a digest of the laws of England, a History of England

under the Princes of the House of Tudor, a body of National History, a

Philosophical Romance. He made extensive and valuable additions to his

Essays. He published the inestimable _Treatise De Augmentis

Scientiarum_.

Did these labors of Hercules fill up his time to his contentment, and

quiet his appetite for work? Not entirely:

The trifles with which he amused himself in hours of pain and languor

bore the mark of his mind. _The Best Jest-Book In The World_ is that

which he dictated from memory, without referring to any book, on a day

on which illness had rendered him incapable of serious study.

Here are some scattered remarks (from Macaulay) which throw light upon

Bacon, and seem to indicate—and maybe demonstrate—that he was competent

to write the Plays and Poems:

With great minuteness of observation he had an amplitude of

comprehension such as has never yet been vouchsafed to any other human

being.

The _Essays_ contain abundant proofs that no nice feature of character,

no peculiarity in the ordering of a house, a garden, or a court-masque,

could escape the notice of one whose mind was capable of taking in the

whole world of knowledge.

His understanding resembled the tent which the fairy Paribanou gave to

Prince Ahmed: fold it, and it seemed a toy for the hand of a lady;

spread it, and the armies of the powerful Sultans might repose beneath

its shade.

The knowledge in which Bacon excelled all men was a knowledge of the

mutual relations of all departments of knowledge.

In a letter written when he was only thirty-one, to his uncle, Lord

Burleigh, he said, “I have taken all knowledge to be my province.”

Though Bacon did not arm his philosophy with the weapons of logic, he

adorned her profusely with all the richest decorations of rhetoric.

The practical faculty was powerful in Bacon; but not, like his wit, so

powerful as occasionally to usurp the place of his reason and to

tyrannize over the whole man.

There are too many places in the Plays where this happens. Poor old

dying John of Gaunt volleying second-rate puns at his own name, is a

pathetic instance of it. “We may assume” that it is Bacon’s fault, but

the Stratford Shakespeare has to bear the blame.

No imagination was ever at once so strong and so thoroughly subjugated.

It stopped at the first check from good sense.

In truth, much of Bacon’s life was passed in a visionary world—amid

things as strange as any that are described in the _Arabian Tales_...

amid buildings more sumptuous than the palace of Aladdin, fountains

more wonderful than the golden water of Parizade, conveyances more

rapid than the hippogryph of Ruggiero, arms more formidable than the

lance of Astolfo, remedies more efficacious than the balsam of

Fierabras. Yet in his magnificent day-dreams there was nothing

wild—nothing but what sober reason sanctioned.

Bacon’s greatest performance is the first book of the _Novum

Organum_.... Every part of it blazes with wit, but with wit which is

employed only to illustrate and decorate truth. No book ever made so

great a revolution in the mode of thinking, overthrew so may

prejudices, introduced so many new opinions.

But what we most admire is the vast capacity of that intellect which,

without effort, takes in at once all the domains of science—all the

past, the present and the future, all the errors of two thousand years,

all the encouraging signs of the passing times, all the bright hopes of

the coming age.

He had a wonderful talent for packing thought close and rendering it

portable.

His eloquence would alone have entitled him to a high rank in

literature.

It is evident that he had each and every one of the mental gifts and

each and every one of the acquirements that are so prodigally displayed

in the Plays and Poems, and in much higher and richer degree than any

other man of his time or of any previous time. He was a genius without

a mate, a prodigy not matable. There was only one of him; the planet

could not produce two of him at one birth, nor in one age. He could

have written anything that is in the Plays and Poems. He could have

written this:

The cloud-cap’d towers, the gorgeous palaces,

The solemn temples, the great globe itself,

Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve,

And, like an insubstantial pageant faded,

Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff

As dreams are made on, and our little life

Is rounded with a sleep.

Also, he could have written this, but he refrained:

Good friend for Iesus sake forbeare

To digg the dust encloased heare:

Blest be ye man yt spares thes stones

And curst be he yt moves my bones.

When a person reads the noble verses about the cloud-cap’d towers, he

ought not to follow it immediately with Good friend for Iesus sake

forbeare, because he will find the transition from great poetry to poor

prose too violent for comfort. It will give him a shock. You never

notice how commonplace and unpoetic gravel is until you bite into a

layer of it in a pie.

What Is Man? and Other Essays · 第 77 / 84 题