IX

In April, 1864, Baudelaire left Paris for Brussels, where he stayed in

the Hôtel du Grand-Miroir, rue de la Montagne. Before then his nerves

had begun to torment him; they played tricks with his very system; he

wrote very little prose and no verse. It was with a kind of desperate

obstination--a more than desperate obstinacy--that he strove to prevent

himself from giving way to his pessimistic conceptions of life, to his

morbid over-sensibility that ached as his flesh ached. Unsatiated,

unsatisfied, for once in his existence irresolute in regard to what he

wanted to do, watching himself with an almost casuistical casuistry,

alone and yet not alone in the streets of Paris, he wandered, a

_noctambule,_ night after night, sombre and sinister. So a ghost

self-obsessed might wander in desolate cities seeing ever before him

the Angel of Destruction.

Did he then know that he was becoming more and more abnormal? This I

ignore. This, I suppose, he alone knew; and hated too much knowledge of

his precarious condition. He was veritably more alone than ever, before

he plunged--as one who might see shipwreck before him--into that gulf

that is no gulf, that extends not between hell and heaven, but that one

names Brussels.

[Illustration: manuscript]

Still he frequented his favourite haunts, the Moulin-Rouge, the Casino

de la rue Cadet, and other cabarets. He saw then, as I saw many

years afterwards, pass some of his Flowers of Evil--some who knew him

and had read his verses, most of whom he ignored--macabre, with hectic

cheeks and tortured eyes and painted faces; these strange nocturnal

birds of passage that flit to and fro, the dancers and the hired

women; always--so Latin an attitude of their traditional trade!--with

enquiring and sidelong glances at men and at women.

I can see him now, as I write, sit in certain corners of the

Moulin-Rouge--as I did--drinking strange drinks and smoking cigarettes;

hearing with all his old sensuality that adorable and cynical and

perverse and fascinating _Valse des Roses_ of Olivier Métra: a

maddening music to the soundless sound of the mad dances of the

_Chahut_--danced by dancers of both sexes, ambiguous and exotic and

neurotic--that, as the avid circle forms hastily around them, set their

fevers into our fevers, their nerves into our nerves.

It was in May, 1892, that, having crossed the streets of Paris from

the hotel where I was staying, the Hôtel Corneille, in the Latin

Quarter (made famous by Balzac in his superb story, _Z. Marcas_,) I

found myself in Le Jardin de Paris, where I saw for the first time

La Mélinite. She danced in a quadrille: young and girlish, the more

provocative because she played as a prude, with an assumed modesty;

_décolletée_ nearly to the waist, in the Oriental fashion. She had

long, black curls around her face; and had about her a depraved

virginity.

And she caused in me, even then, a curious sense of depravity that

perhaps comes into the verses I wrote on her. There, certainly, on

the night of May 22nd, danced in her feverish, her perverse, her

enigmatical beauty, La Mélinite, to her own image in the mirror:

"A shadow smiling

Back to a shadow in the night,"

as she cadenced Olivier Métra's _Valse des Roses._

It is a fact of curious interest that in 1864 Poulet-Malassis was

obliged to leave Paris--on account of his misfortunes as a publisher,

in regard to money, and for various other reasons--and to exile himself

in Brussels: still more curious that Baudelaire--drawn, perhaps, by

some kind of affinity in their natures--followed him sooner than he

had intended to go. Malassis lived in rue de Mercedes, 35 _bis,_

Faubourg d'Ixilles. In those years both saw a great deal of the famous,

perverse, macabre Félicien Rops.

Malassis, naturally, was obliged, in his expedients for living as he

used to live, to publish privately printed obscene books; some no more

than erotic. As Baudelaire hated, with his Parisian refinement, that

kind of certainly objectionable literature, on May 4th, 1865, he writes

to Sainte-Beuve: "As for Malassis, his terrible affair arrives on the

12th. He believes he will be condemned for five years. What there

is grave in this is that that closes France for him for five years.

But that cuts him for a time from his ways of living. I see in it no

great evil. As for me, who am no fool, I have never possessed one of

these idiotic books, even printed in fine characters and with fine

engravings." As a matter of fact, Malassis was condemned in May, 1866,

to one year's imprisonment for having privately printed _Les Amies_ of

Paul Verlaine--a book of sonnets, attributed to an imaginary Pablo de

Herlaguez.

Baudelaire, as I have said, had many reasons for going to Brussels.

Among these was his urgent desire of finding a publisher to print his

collected works--having failed to find any publisher for them. Another

was that of giving lectures--a thing he was not made for--and for two

other reasons: one of making immediate money, one of adding to his fame

as a writer. Then, to write a book on Belgium.

He writes to Manet (who has written to him: "Do return to Paris! No

happiness can come to you while you live in that damned country!"):

"As for finishing here _Pauvre Belgique,_ I am incapable of it: I am

near on dead. I have quite a lot of _Poèmes en Prose_ to get printed in

magazines. I can do no more than that. _Je souffre d'un mal qui je n'ai

pas, comme j'étais gamin, et que je vivais au bout du monde."_

His book was to have been humorous, mocking, and serious--his final

separation from modern stupidity. "People may understand me, perhaps,

then." "Nothing," he confesses, "can console me in my detestable

misery, in my humiliating situation, nor especially in my vices."

In February, 1865, he writes: "As for my present state, it is an

absolute abdication of the will. (_C'est une parfaite abdication de la

volonté._)" What reason, I wonder, was there for him to "abdicate" the

one element in our natures by which we live at our greatest, the very

root of our passions (as Balzac said), "nervous fluids and that unknown

substance which, in default of another term, we must call the will?"

Man has a given quality of energy; each man a different quality: how

will he spend it? That is Balzac's invariable question. All these

qualities were always in Baudelaire.

Had he finally, after so many years in which his energy was supreme,

lost some of his energy, struggling, as he seems to do, against

insuperable difficulties that beset him on either side, like thieves

that follow men in the dark with the intention of stabbing you in the

back? Does he then try to conjecture what next year might bring him

of good or of evil? He has lived his life after his own will: what

shall the end be? He dares neither look backward nor forward. It might

be that he feels the earth crumbling under his feet; for how many

artists have had that fear--the fear that the earth under their feet

may no longer be solid? There is another step for him to take, a step

that frightens him; might it not be into another more painful kind of

oblivion? Has something of the man gone out of him: that is to say, the

power to live for himself?

In the summer of 1865 Baudelaire spent several days in Paris, seeing

Banville and other friends of his. They found him unchanged; his eyes

clear; his voice musical; he talked as wonderfully as ever. They used

all their logic to persuade him to remain in Paris. He refused, even

after Gautier had said to him: "You are astonishing: can one conceive

your mania of eternalizing yourself in a land where one is only bored

to extinction?" He laughed; promised to return: he never did; it was

the last day when his friends possessed him entirely.

In his years of exile he printed Poe's _Histoires grotesques et

sérieuses_ (1864); _Les nouvelles fleurs du mal_ in _La Parnasse

contemporaine_ (1866). In 1865 Poulet-Malassis printed _Les épaves de

Charles Baudelaire._ Avec une eau-forte de Félicien Rops. Amsterdam. A

l'enseigne du Coq. 1865. 165 pages.

"Avertissement de l'Éditeur.

"Ce recueil est composé de morceaux poétiques, pour la plupart

condamnés ou inédits, auxquels M. Charles Baudelaire n'a pas cru devoir

faire place dans l'édition définitive des _Fleurs du mal._

"Cela explique son titre.

"M. Charles Baudelaire a fait don, sans réserve, de ces poëmes, à un

ami qui juge à propos de les publier, parce qu'il se flatte de les

goûter, et qu'il est à un âge où l'on aime encore à faire partager ses

sentiments à des amis auxquels on prête ses vertus.

"L'auteur sera avisé de cette publication en même temps que les deux

cents soixantes lectures probables qui figurent--à peu près--pour son

éditeur bénévole, le public littéraire en France, depuis que les bêtes

y ont décidément usurpé la parole sur les hommes."

I have before me two copies of this rare edition, printed on yellow

Holland paper; one numbered 100, the other 194. The second has

inscribed in ink: _A Monsieur Rossetti pour remplir les intentions de

l'auteur avec les civilités de l'éditeur A. P. Malassis._ This was sent

on the part of Baudelaire to Dante Gabriel Rossetti. It is superbly

bound in a kind of red-purple thick leather binding, with pale gold

squares, in the form of the frame of a picture; done, certainly, with

great taste.

On January 3, 1865, Baudelaire writes a letter to his mother; a letter

that pains one as one reads it: so resigned he seems to be, yet never

in his life less resigned to his fate. He fears that God might deprive

him of even happiness; that it is more difficult to think than to write

a book; that if only he were certain of having five or six years before

him he might execute all that remained for him to do; that he has the

fixed idea of death; that he has suffered so much already that he

believes many things may be forgiven him (sins of concupiscence, sins

of conscience, sins one never forgets) as he has been punished so much.

I pass from this to the beginning of March, 1866. He stays with Rops

at Namur, where (certainly by bad luck) he enters again l'Église

Saint-Loup, which he had spoken of as "this sinister marvel in the

interior of a catafalque--terrible and delicious--broidered with gold,

red, and silver." As he admires these richly sculptured confessionals,

as he speaks with Rops and Malassis, he stumbles, taken by a kind of

dizziness in the head, and sits down on a step in the church. They

lift him up; he feigns not to be frightened, says that his foot had

slipped accidentally. Next day he shows signs of a nervous trouble, not

a mental one; asking them in the train to Brussels to have the window

opened; it is open. That is the first sign of his loss of speech, and

the last letter that he ever wrote (dated March 30th, 1866), ends: _Je

ne puis pas bouger._ It is strange to set beside this Balzac's last

words, that end a letter written June 20th, 1856: _Je ne puis ni lire

ni écrire._ It is written to Théophile Gautier.

Swinburne, having heard the fatal news in regard to Baudelaire, added

to his book on Blake these magnificent words: as pure, as fervent a

tribute to the memory of a fellow-artist as Baudelaire might have

wished to have been written on himself, as Swinburne might have desired

to have been written on himself: "I heard that a mortal illness had

indeed stricken the illustrious poet, the faultless critic, the

fearless artist; that no more of fervent yet of perfect verse, no more

of subtle yet of sensitive comment, will be granted us at the hands of

Charles Baudelaire. We may see again as various a power as was his,

may feel again as fiery a sympathy, may hear again as tragic a manner

of revelation, as sad a whisper of knowledge, as mysterious a music of

emotion; we shall never find so keen, so delicate, so deep an unison

of sense and spirit. What verse he could make, how he loved all fair

and felt all strange things, with what infallible taste he knew at

once the limit and the licence of his art, all may see at a glance. He

could give beauty to the form, expression to the feeling, most horrible

and most obscure to the senses or souls of lesser men. The chances

of things parted us once and again; the admiration of some years, at

least in part expressed, brought him near to me by way of written or

transmitted word; let it be an excuse for the insertion of this note,

and for a desire, if so it must be, to repeat for once the immortal

words which too often return upon our lips:

_Atque in perpetuum, frater, ave atque vale!"_

And I, who have transcribed these words, have before me a book that

Swinburne showed me, that he had richly bound in Paris, and that I

bought at the sale of his library on June 19th: _Richard Wagner et

Tannhäuser à Paris._ Par Charles Baudelaire. Paris, 1861; with,

written in pencil, on the page before the title-page, these words:

"_A Mr. Algernon C. Swinburne. Bon Souvenir et mille Remerciements. C.

B._"

From April 9, 1866, to August 31, 1867, Baudelaire endures the slow

tortures of a body and a soul condemned to go on living; living, what

else can it be called, than a kind of living death? To remain, in most

senses, himself; to be, as always, Charles Baudelaire; to have in his

mind one desire, the desire, the vain desire, of recovery; to be unable

to utter one word; to think, to sleep, to conceive imaginary projects,

for his near future, for his verse, for his prose: to walk, to eat,

to drink; to be terribly conscious of his dolorous situation; to be,

as ever, anxious for a new edition of _Les fleurs du mal;_ to mark a

date in an almanac, counting three months, when he imagined he would

be in a state to superintend the impression of his final edition; to

have finally given up all hope, all illusion; to have gazed out of his

wonderful eyes, at his friend's faces, eyes shadowed by an expression

of infinite sadness, eyes that endured his last tragedy: that is how

Baudelaire survived himself to the end.

He died on Saturday, August 31, 1867, at eleven o'clock in the morning,

at the age of forty-six and four months. So died, simply and without

any trace of suffering, this man of genius. Had he been thoroughly

understood by the age in which he lived? Blake, who said the final

truth on this question: "The ages are all equal; but genius is always

above the ages:" was not understood in his age.

Charles Baudelaire: A Study · 第 24 / 38 题