II

Why are we not having revelations to-day as we know they have been

given at other times? Why is not some one in our own land especially

working out some of the great plans and purposes of God? The question

is easily answered. The difficulty is not with God. He is the same

forever. We alone must be at fault. Without any spirit of harsh

criticism and with a prayer to God that he will make my spirit as he

would have it, permit me to say that I fear the visions are not being

given to us for the following reasons:

First: Because of the disrespect shown to his Son. We have come to a

time when men seek to limit his knowledge, and occasionally they are

saying that he did not know concerning the things of which he spake.

Such blasphemy makes us shudder. There is a disposition to

misinterpret his teaching. They did it in Paul's day and he spoke by

inspiration when he said, "If any man present another gospel than that

which I have presented let him be accursed." There is a disposition to

rob him of his deity. "Is Jesus divine?" was the question asked not

long ago of one who called himself a minister, and he answered, "Yes,

in the sense that Buddha is divine or Confucius is divine." Our faces

grow white with fear as we listen to such blasphemous statements in

such an age as this. This helps to overcast the sky and God can hardly

trust us with a vision in such an atmosphere.

Second: An irreverent criticism of the Word of God. That there is a

reverent criticism all will allow, and that many who are walking these

paths are devout believers in God and in his word I would like to be

among the first to acknowledge. There are three kinds of critics

to-day. First: Those who honestly want the best and who are studying

carefully and prayerfully to know the truth. Second: Those who ape

scholarship. Third: Those whose lives may not be right, and for them

if any part of the Bible could be cut away they would be less

condemned. We need not fear, however; our Bible is not in danger, for

this is largely a question of scholarship. Some of you who listen to

me may not class yourselves as scholars. I certainly do not put myself

in that company, but one thing I know: I have seen the Bible work as no

other book has ever worked, and I have seen Jesus Christ save

miraculously multitudes of poor lost sinners. I am not disturbed for

the future; there are as great scholars as the world has ever known who

still hold to your mother's Bible and who have lost not one whit of

confidence in it.

Thomas Newberry, a devout English student, spent fifty years in study

to give the world his Newberry Bible. He said, "I accept the theory of

the plenary inspiration of the Scriptures. I have studied every 'jot

and tittle' of the Word of God and after these fifty years I see no

reason for changing my position." Scholars' names almost without

number could be mentioned as believing in the Scriptures as the

divinely inspired Word of God. For myself I would have great assurance

in standing side by side with Dr. Paton, and I would not think of

trembling so long as our sainted Dr. Moorehead walks courageously along

life's journey as he nears its end with faith in God's Word unshaken,

with confidence in God's Son constantly growing. This blessed old Book

has been railed at in all the ages. Men have professed to overthrow

it, they have cut and slashed at it like Jehoiakim of old, but it is

better than ever to-day. It is the Word of God. Heaven and earth may

pass away but this Word, never.

Not long ago I attended a conference of Christian workers and was told

by one of them that I could not appreciate the Bible except I read it

with the thought of literary criticism in mind. My friend interpreted

a portion of the Word of God for me in this way and it was beautiful.

It reminded me of nothing so much as a diamond perfectly cut, kissed by

the sunlight and throwing back its sparkling light to me as I gazed

upon it.

Another said that I would never be able to understand the Bible until I

read it from the standpoint of the elocutionist in the best use of that

expression, and he read in my hearing the story of Joseph and his

brethren and I felt that I myself had never read the Bible before and

really had never heard it read.

Still another came with his higher criticism and said that much of the

Bible was mythical, that the stories I had loved were simply

allegorical; and I listened to him and went back to my Bible to read,

only to find that you may read it any way, spell it out in your youth

letter by letter, read it through your tears as you reach middle life

and your heart is aching, hold it against your heart when your eyes are

too dim to read its pages, and it will yield to you a sweetness which

is actually beyond the power of man to describe. This is a wonderful

Book and in this Book God reveals himself. Handle it irreverently and

you will have no vision.

Third: It seems to me that the church is not what she ought to be, and

this being true the vision is denied. One of my friends said the other

day that the difficulty with the church is that she has lost her

interrogation point. At the day of Pentecost people were saying, "What

do these things mean?" To-day they never think of saying it. I have

been told in a little pamphlet issued by an English writer that the

church has lost her possessive case, which means that somehow she has

gone on without realizing that the risen, glorified Christ is her

blessed Lord. It is a great thing to say "Jesus"; infinitely greater

is it to say "My Jesus." The church has lost her imperative mode. In

days that are past it was possible for the church to stand in the

presence of evil and say, "In the name of Almighty God this iniquity

must stop." But to-day it is not possible. The church has lost her

present tense. We are constantly looking for blessings in the future.

God's promises are all written for the present. It is to the church on

fire that God grants a vision.

Fourth: Some of the difficulty must rest with us as ministers of the

Gospel. I fear that some of us have lost our message. It has loosened

its grip upon us, and you never can move another man until you are

first moved yourself by the message you would give to him.

At a great gathering not long ago I heard a distinguished Eastern

professor speaking. The topic of his lecture was "My Foster Children,"

and these foster children were some animals which he had had as pets,

whose habits he had carefully studied. One was a Gila monster from the

plains of Arizona, another was a horned owl, the third was a rat, and

the fourth was an opossum. If you can imagine more uninteresting

subjects than these you are more imaginative than myself, and yet he

thrilled me and held three thousand people in breathless interest. Oh,

my brethren, if I believe in Jesus Christ as the Son of God and as a

Savior able not only to save to the uttermost but to keep through

eternity, and that message grips me, I am a poor preacher if I fail

with it to grip and move other men. I fear we have lost our boldness.

I am a minister of the glorious Gospel of the grace of God and I have a

right to demand a hearing and to give my message, not because of what I

am myself--God forbid--but because of what my Savior is. Some of us

have lost our passion for souls; we mourn over it, we know that when we

once had this it was the secret of a successful ministry. It is not

wrong for me to say to you this morning that to the minister without a

message, to the minister who has lost his holy boldness, to the

minister who has anything less than a burning passion for souls, God

cannot give his vision.

And Judas Iscariot Together with other evangelistic addresses · 第 65 / 91 题