Is that which proceeds by reasoning upon certain external signs,

considered as indications of futurity.

_Natural Divination_,

Is that which presages things from a mere internal sense, and persuasion

of the mind, without any assistance of signs; and is of two kinds, the

one from nature, and the other by influx. The first is the supposition

that the soul, collected within itself, and not diffused, or divided

among the organs of the body, has, from its own nature and essence, some

foreknowledge of future things: witness what is seen in dreams,

ecstasies, the confines of death, &c. The second supposes that the soul,

after the manner of a minor, receives some secondary illumination from

the presence of God and other spirits.

Artificial divination is also of two kinds; the one argues from natural

causes; _e. g._ the predictions of physicians about the event of

diseases, from the pulse, tongue, urine, &c. Such also are those of the

politician, _O venalem urbem, et mox peuturam, si emptorem inveneris!_

The second proceeds from experiments and observations arbitrarily

instituted, and is mostly superstitious.

The systems of divination reducible under this head, are almost

incalculable, _e. g._ by birds, the entrails of birds, lines of the

hand, points marked at random, numbers, names, the motion of a sieve,

the air, fire, the Sortes Prænestinæ, Virgilianæ, and Homericæ; with

numerous others, the principal species and names of which are as

follows:—

AXINOMANCY,

Was an ancient species of divination or method of foretelling future

events by means of an axe or hatchet. The word is derived from the

Greek, αξινη, _securis_; μαντεια, _divinatio_. This art was in

considerable repute among the ancients; and was performed, according to

some, by laying an agate stone upon a red hot hatchet.

ALECTOROMANTIA,

Is an ancient kind of divination, performed by means of a cock, which

was used among the Greeks, in the following manner.—A circle was made on

the ground, and divided into 24 equal portions or spaces: in each space

was written one of the letters of the alphabet, and upon each of these

letters was laid a grain of wheat. This being done, a cock was placed

within the circle, and careful observation was made of the grains he

picked. The letters corresponding to these grains were afterwards formed

into a word, which word was the answer decreed. It was thus that

Libanius and Jamblicus sought who should succeed the Emperor Valens; and

the cock answering to the spaces ΘΕΟΔ, they concluded upon Theodore, but

by a mistake, instead of Theodosius.

ARITHMOMANCY,

Is a kind of divination or method of foretelling future events, by means

of numbers. The Gematria, which makes the first species of the Jewish

Cabala, is a kind of Arithmomancy.

BELOMANCY,

Is a method of divination by means of arrows, practised in the East, but

chiefly among the Arabians.

Belomancy has been performed in different manners: one was to mark a

parcel of arrows, and to put eleven or more of them into a bag; these

were afterwards drawn out, and according as they were marked, or

otherwise, they judged of future events. Another way was, to have three

arrows, upon one of which was written, _God forbids it me_; upon

another, _God orders it me_; and upon the third nothing at all. These

were put into a quiver, out of which one of the three was drawn at

random; if it happened to be that with the second inscription, the thing

they consulted about was to be done; if it chanced to be that with the

first inscription, the thing was let alone; and if it proved to be that

without any inscription, they drew over again. Belomancy is an ancient

practice, and is probably that which Ezekiel mentions, chap. xxi. v. 21.

At least St. Jerome understands it so, and observes that the practice

was frequent among the Assyrians and Babylonians. Something like it is

also mentioned in Hosea, chap. vi. only that staves are mentioned there

instead of arrows, which is rather Rhabdomancy than Belomancy. Grotius,

as well as Jerome, confounds the two together, and shews that they

prevailed much among the Magi, Chaldeans, and Scythians, from whom they

passed to the Sclavonians, and thence to the Germans, whom Tacitus

observes to make use of Belomancy.

CLEROMANCY,

Is a kind of divination performed by the throwing of dice or little

bones; and observing the points or marks turned up.

At Bura, a city of Achaia, was a temple, and a celebrated Temple of

Hercules; where such as consulted the oracle, after praying to the idol,

threw four dice, the points of which being well scanned by the priests,

he was supposed to draw an answer from them.

CLEDONISM.

This word is derived from the Greek κληδων, which signifies two things;

viz. _rumour_, a report, and _avis_, a bird; in the first sense,

_Cledonism_ should denote a kind of divination drawn from words

occasionally uttered. Cicero observes, that the Pythagoreans made

observations not only of the words of the gods, but of those of men; and

accordingly believed the pronouncing of certain words, _e. g._

_incendium_, at a meal, very unlucky. Thus, instead of prison, they used

the words _domicilium_; and to avoid erinnyes, said _Eumenides_. In the

second sense, Cledonism should seem a divination drawn from birds; the

same with ornithomantia.

COSCINOMANCY.

As the word implies, is the art of divination by means of a sieve.

The sieve being suspended, after repeating a certain form of words, it

is taken between two fingers only; and the names of the parties

suspected, repeated: he at whose name the sieve turns, trembles or

shakes, is reputed guilty of the evil in question. This doubtless must

be a very ancient practice. Theocritus, in his third Idyllion, mentions

a woman who was very skilful in it. It was sometimes also practised by

suspending the sieve by a thread, or fixing it to the points of a pair

of scissars, giving it room to turn, and naming as before the parties

suspected: in this manner Coscinomancy is still practised in some parts

of England. From Theocritus it appears, that it was not only used to

find out persons unknown, but also to discover the secrets of those who

were.

CAPNOMANCY,

Is a kind of divination by means of smoke, used by the ancients in their

sacrifices. The general rule was—when the smoke was thin and light, and

ascended straight up, it was a good omen; if on the contrary, it was an

ill one.

There was another species of Capnomancy which consisted in observing the

smoke arising from poppy and jessamin seed, cast upon burning coals.

CATOPTROMANCY,

Is another species of divination used by the ancients, performed by

means of a mirror.

Pausanias says, that this method of divination was in use among the

Achaians; where those who were sick, and in danger of death, let down a

mirror, or looking-glass, fastened by a thread, into a fountain before

the temple of Ceres; then looking in the glass, if they saw a ghastly

disfigured face, they took it as a sure sign of death; but, on the

contrary, if the face appeared fresh and healthy, it was a token of

recovery. Sometimes glasses were used without water, and the images of

future things, it is said, were represented in them.

CHIROMANCY,

Is the art of divining the fate, temperament, and disposition of a

person by the lines and lineaments of the hands.

There are a great many authors on this vain and trifling art, viz.

Artemidorus, Fludd, Johannes De Indagine, Taconerus, and M. De le

Chambre, who are among the best.

M. De le Chambre insists upon it that the inclinations of people may be

known from consulting the lines on the hands; there being a very near

correspondence between the parts of the hand and the internal parts of

the body, the heart, liver, &c. “whereon the passions and inclinations

much depend.” He adds, however, that the rules and precepts of

Chiromancy are not sufficiently warranted; the experiments on which they

stand not being well verified. He concludes by observing, that there

should be a new set of observations, made with justness and exactitude,

in order to give to Chiromancy that form and solidity which an art of

science demands.

DACTYLIOMANCY.

This is a sort of divination performed by means of a ring. It was done

as follows, viz. by holding a ring, suspended by a fine thread, over a

round table, on the edge of which were made a number of marks with the

24 letters of the alphabet. The ring in shaking or vibrating over the

table, stopped over certain of the letters, which, being joined

together, composed the required answer. But this operation was preceded

and accompanied by several superstitious ceremonies; for, in the first

place, the ring was to be consecrated with a great deal of mystery; the

person holding it was to be clad in linen garments, to the very shoes;

his head was to be shaven all round, and he was to hold vervein in his

hand. And before he proceeded on any thing the gods were first to be

appeased by a formulary of prayers, &c.

The whole process of this mysterious rite is given in the 29th book of

Ammianus Marcellinus.

EXTISPICIUM,

(From _exta_ and _spicere_, to view, consider.)

The name of the officer who shewed and examined the entrails of the

victims was Extispex.

This method of divination, or of drawing presages relative to futurity,

was much practised throughout Greece, where there were two families, the

_Jamidæ_ and _Clytidæ_, consecrated or set apart particularly for the

exercise of it.

The Hetrurians, in Italy, were the first _Extispices_, among whom

likewise the art was in great repute. Lucan gives us a fine description

of one of these operations in his first book.

GASTROMANCY.

This species of divination, practised among the ancients, was performed

by means of words coming or appearing to come out of the belly.

There is another kind of divination called by the same name, which is

performed by means of glasses, or other round transparent vessels,

within which certain figures appear by magic art. Hence its name, in

consequence of the figures appearing as if in the belly of the vessels.

GEOMANCY,

Was performed by means of a number of little points or dots, made at

random on paper; and afterwards considering the various lines and

figures, which those points present; thereby forming a pretended

judgment of futurity, and deciding a proposed question.

Polydore Virgil defines Geomancy a kind of divination performed by means

of clefts or chinks made in the ground; and he takes the Persian magi to

have been the inventors of it. _De invent. rer._ lib. 1, c. 23.

⁂ Geomancy is formed of the Greek γη _terra_, earth; and μαντεια,

divination; it being the ancien custom to cast little pebbles on the

ground, and thence to form their conjecture, instead of the points

above-mentioned.

HYDROMANCY, ὙΔΡΟΜΑΤΕΙΑ,

The art of divining or foretelling future events by means of water; and

is one of the four general kinds of divination: the other three, as

regarding the other elements, _viz._ fire and earth, are denominated

Pyromancy, Aeromancy, and Geomancy already mentioned.

The Persians are said by Varro to have been the first inventors of

Hydromancy; observing also that Numa Pompilius, and Pythagoras, made use

of it.

There are various Hydromantic machines and vessels, which are of a

singularly curious nature.

NECROMANCY,

Is the art of communicating with devils, and doing surprising things by

means of their aid; particularly that of calling up the dead and

extorting answers from them. (See MAGIC.)

ONEIROCRITICA,

Is the art of interpreting dreams; or a method of foretelling future

events by means of dreams.

From several passages of Scripture, it appears that, under the Jewish

dispensation, there was such a thing as foretelling future events by

dreams; but there was a particular gift or revelation required for that

purpose. Hence it would appear that dreams are actually significative of

something to come; and all that is wanting among us is, the

_Oneirocritica_, or the art of knowing what: still it is the general

opinion of the present day that dreams are mere chimera, induced by

various causes, have no affinity with the realization of future events;

but having, at the same time, indeed, some relation to what has already

transpired.

With respect to Joseph’s dream, “it was possible,” says an old author,

“for God, who knew all things, to discover to him what was in the womb

of fate; and to introduce that, he might avail himself of a dream; not

but that he might as well have foretold it from any other accident or

circumstance whatever; unless God, to give the business more importance,

should purposely communicate such a dream to Pharoah, in order to fall

in with the popular notion of dreams and divination, which at that time

was so prevalent among the Egyptians.”

The name given to the interpreters of dreams, or those who judge of

events from the circumstances of dreams, was _Oneirocritics_. There is

not much confidence to be placed in those Greek books called

Oneirocritics; they are replete with superstition of the times. Rigault

has given us a collection of the Greek and Latin works of this kind; one

of which is attributed to _Astrampsichus_; another to Nicephorus, the

patriarch of Constantinople; to which are added the treatises of

Artimedorus and Achmet. But the books themselves are little else than

reveries or waking dreams, to explain and account for sleeping ones.

The secret of _Oneirocritism_, according to all these authors, consists

in the relations supposed to exist between the dream and the thing

signified; but they are far from keeping to the relations of agreement

and similitudes; and frequently they have recourse to others of

dissimilitude and contrariety.

ONOMANCY, or ONOMAMANCY[35],

Is the art of divining the good or bad fortune which will befall a man

from the letters of his name. This mode of divination was a very popular

and reputable practice among the ancients.

The Pythagoreans taught that the minds, actions, and successes of

mankind, were according to their fate, genius, and name; and Plato

himself inclines somewhat to the same opinion.—Ausonius to Probus

expresses it in the following manner:—

Qualem creavit moribus,

Jussit vocari NOMINE

Mundi supremus arbiter.

In this manner he sports with tippling Meroe, as if her name told she

would drink pure wine without water; or as he calls it, _merum mereim_.

Thus Hippolytus was observed to be torn to pieces by his own coach

horses, as his name imported; and thus Agamemnon signified that he

should linger long before Troy; Priam, that he should be redeemed out of

bondage in his childhood. To this also may be referred that of Claudius

Rutilius:—

Nominibus certis credam decurrere mores?

Moribus aut Potius nomina certa dari?

It is a frequent and no less just observation in history, that the

greatest Empires and States have been founded and destroyed by men of

the same name. Thus, for instance, Cyrus, the son of Cambyses, began the

Persian monarchy; and Cyrus, the son of Darius, ruined it; Darius, son

of Hystaspes, restored it; and, again, Darius, son of Asamis, utterly

overthrew it. Phillip, son of Amyntas, exceedingly enlarged the kingdom

of Macedonia; and Phillip, son of Antigonus, wholly lost it. Augustus

was the first Emperor of Rome; Augustulus the last. Constantine first

settled the empire of Constantinople, and Constantine lost it wholly to

the Turks.

There is a similar observation that some names are constantly

unfortunate to princes: _e. g._ Caius, among the Romans; John, in

France, England and Scotland; and Henry, in France.

One of the principal rules of Onomancy, among the Pythagoreans, was,

that an even number of vowels in a name signified an imperfection in the

left side of a man; and an odd number in the right.—Another rule, about

as good as this, was, that those persons were the most happy, in whose

names the numeral letters, added together, made the greatest sum; for

which reason, say they, it was, that Achilles vanquished Hector; the

numeral letters, in the former name, amounting to a greater number than

the latter. And doubtless it was from a like principle that the young

Romans toasted their mistresses at their meetings as often as their

names contained letters.

“Nævia sex cyathis, septem Justina bibatur!”

Rhodingius describes a singular kind of Onomantia.—Theodotus, King of

the Goths, being curious to learn the success of his wars against the

Romans, an Onomantical Jew ordered him to shut up a number of swine in

little stys, and to give some of them Roman, and others Gothic names,

with different marks to distinguish them, and there to keep them till a

certain day; which day having come, upon inspecting the stys they found

those dead to whom the Gothic names had been given, and those alive to

whom the Roman names were assigned.—Upon which the Jew foretold the

defeat of the Goths.

ONYCOMANCY, or ONYMANCY.

This kind of divination is performed by means of the finger nails. The

ancient practice was, to rub the nails of a youth with oil and soot, or

wax, and to hold up the nails, thus prepared, against the sun; upon

which there were supposed to appear figures or characters, which shewed

the thing required. Hence also modern Chiromancers call that branch of

their art which relates to the inspection of nails, ONYCOMANCY.

ORNITHOMANCY,

Is a kind of divination, or method of arriving at the knowledge of

futurity, by means of birds; it was among the Greeks what Augury was

among the Romans.

PYROMANCY,

A species of divination performed by means of fire.

The ancients imagined they could foretel futurity by inspecting fire and

flame; for this purpose they considered its direction, or which way it

turned. Sometimes they added other matters to the fire, _e. g._ a vessel

full of urine, with its neck bound round with wool; and narrowly watched

the side in which it would burst, and thence took their prognostic.

Sometimes they threw pitch in it, and if it took fire instantly, they

considered it a favourable omen.

PYSCOMANCY, or SCIOMANCY,

An art among the ancients of raising or calling up the manes or souls of

deceased persons, to give intelligence of things to come. The witch who

conjured up the soul of Samuel, to foretel Saul the event of the battle

he was about to give, did so by Sciomancy.

RHABDOMANCY,

Was an ancient method of divination, performed by means of rods or

staves. St. Jerome mentions this kind of divination in his Commentary on

Hosea, chap. vi. 12.; where the prophet says, in the name of God: _My

people ask counsel at their stocks; and their staff declareth unto

them_: which passage that father understands of the Grecian

_Rhabdomancy_.

The same is met with again in Ezekiel, xxi. 21, 22. where the prophet

says: _For the king of Babylon stood at the parting of the way_, at the

head of the two ways, to use divination; he made his arrows bright; or,

as St. Jerome renders it, _he mixed his arrows; he consulted with

images; he looked in the liver_.

If it be the same kind of divination that is alluded to in these two

passages, _Rhabdomancy_ must be the same kind of superstition with

Belomancy. These two, in fact, are generally confounded. The Septuagint

themselves translate ‏חצים‎ of Ezekiel, by ῥαβδος, a rod; though in

strictness it signifies an arrow. So much however is certain, that the

instruments of divination mentioned by Hosea are different from those of

Ezekiel. In the former it is ‏עצו‎ _etso_, ‏מקלו‎ _maklo_, his wood, his

staff: in the latter ‏חצים‎ _hhitism_, arrows. Though it is possible

they might use rods or arrows indifferently; or the military men might

use arrows and the rest rods.

By the laws of the Frisones, it appears that the ancient inhabitants of

Germany practised Rhabdomancy. The Scythians were likewise acquainted

with the use of it: and Herodotus observes, _lib._ vi. that the women

among the Alani sought and gathered together fine straight wands or

rods, and used them for the same superstitious purposes.

Among the various other kinds of divination, not here mentioned, may be

enumerated: _Chiromancy_, performed with keys; _Alphitomancy_ or

_Aleuromancy_, by flour; _Keraunoscopia_, by the consideration of

thunder; _Alectromancy_, by cocks; _Lithomancy_, by stones;

_Eychnomancy_, by lamps; _Ooscopy_, by eggs; _Lecanomancy_, by a basin

of water; _Palpitatim_, _Salisatio_, παλμος, by the pulsation or motion

of some member, &c. &c. &c.

All these kinds of divination have been condemned by the fathers of the

Church, and Councils, as supposing some compact with the devil. Fludd

has written several treatises on divination, and its different species;

and Cicero has two books of the divination of the ancients, in which he

confutes the whole system. Cardan also, in his 4th Book de Sapientia,

describes every species of them.

ORACLE.

The word oracle admits, under this head, of two significations: first,

it is intended to express an answer, usually couched in very dark and

ambiguous terms, supposed to be given by demons of old, either by the

mouths of their idols, or by those of their priests, to those who

consulted them on things to come. The PYTHIAN[36] was always in a rage

when she gave oracles.

Ablancourt observes that the study or research of the meaning of

_Oracles_ was but a fruitless thing; and they were never understood

until they were accomplished. It is related by Historians, that Crœsus

was tricked by the ambiguity and equivocation of the oracle.

Κροισος Άλυν διαβας μεγαλην αρχην καταλνσει. rendered thus in Latin:—

_Crœsus Halym superans magnam pervertet opum vim._

Oracle is also used for the Demon who gave the answer, and the place

where it was given. (Vide DEMON.)

The principal oracles of antiquity are that of Abæ, mentioned by

Herodotus; that of Amphiarus; that of the Branchidæ, at Didymus; that of

the Camps, at Lacedemon; that of Dodona; that of Jupiter Ammon; that of

Nabarca, in the Country of the Anariaci, near the Caspian sea; that of

Trophonius, mentioned by Herodotus; that of Chrysopolis; that of Claros,

in Ionia; that of Mallos; that of Patarea; that of Pella, in Macedonia;

that of Phaselides, in Cilicia; that of Sinope, in Paphlagonia; that of

Orpheus’s head, mentioned by Philostratus in his life of Appolonius, &c.

But, of all others, the oracle of _Apollo Pythius_, at Delphi, was the

most celebrated; it was, in short, consulted always as a _dernier

ressort_, in cases of emergency, by most of the princes of those ages.—

Mr. Bayle observes, that at first, it gave its answers in verse; and

that at length it fell to prose, in consequence of the people beginning

to laugh at the poorness of its versification.

Among the more learned, it is a pretty general opinion that all the

oracles were mere cheats and impostures; calculated either to serve the

avaricious ends of the heathen priests, or the political views of the

princes. Bayle positively asserts, they were mere human artifices, in

which the devil had no hand. In this opinion he is strongly supported by

Van Dale, a Dutch physician, and M. Fontenelle, who have expressly

written on the subject.

There are two points at issue on the subject of _oracles_; viz. whether

they were human or diabolical machines; and whether or not they ceased

upon the publication and preaching of the Gospel?

Plutarch wrote a treatise on the ceasing of some _oracles_: and Van Dale

has a volume to prove that they did not cease at the coming of Christ;

but that many of them had ceased long before the coming of that time,

and that others held out till the fall of Paganism, under the Empire of

Theodosius the Great, and when it was dissipated, these institutions

could no longer resist.

Van Dale was answered by a German, one Mœbius, professor of Theology, at

Leipsic, in 1685. Fontenelle espoused Van Dale’s system, and improved

upon it in his history of oracles; wherein he exposed the weakness of

the argument used by many writers in behalf of Christianity, drawn from

the ceasing of _oracles_.

Demonologia · 第 9 / 28 段