Mr. Serjeant _Bompas_. For that cheque for 650_l._

Mr. _Kelly_. Does it purport to be a cheque signed by the defendant?--I

cannot tell that, it might be a bill made payable upon our house on

their account.

Mr. _Kelly_. I am quite prepared to produce any document in the

handwriting of the prisoner at the bar, which is in his possession; but

as to any document that may bear the signature, or be in the handwriting

of any other member of the firm, that I shall not produce unless that

member of the firm is made a witness to show the circumstances

accompanying the document; unless it passed through the hands of the

prisoner. If you prove any cheque in the handwriting of the prisoner, I

will produce it if I have it, and if not, I shall not object to

secondary evidence of it.

Mr. Serjeant _Bompas_. You say that that is in your writing, have you

any book by which you can ascertain whether it was paid through a cheque

or bill?--No, certainly not.

None whatever?--No; I could not tell whether it was a cheque or a bill.

I cannot tell which; there is no book in our house that will tell us

that.

Trial of Pedro de Zulueta, jun., on a Charge of Slave Trading, under 5 Geo. IV, cap. 113, on Friday the 27th, Saturday the 28th, and Monday the 30th of October, 1843, at the Central Criminal Court, Old Bailey, London A Full Report from the Short-hand Notes of W. B. Gurney, Esq. · 第 72 / 88 题