Hush! pray hush! Silence, ye cackling juniors on the back benches; wake

up, ye sluggards—only they don’t wake up—the noble Viscount at the head

of the Government is speaking. He begins confidently enough, but somewhat

wearily, as though he were thoroughly tired of the whole business. But

he warms gradually, and he, in his turn, too, can say damaging things

about _his_ right honourable friend, head of the Opposition. But he never

says anything spiteful—is at most petulant (loses his temper altogether

sometimes, they say), and flings about some _bon mots_ that, were they

published in this week’s “Punch,” would cause a well-grounded complaint

of the growing dulness of that periodical. He speaks long, and to the

purpose, and you can see at once in what stead have stood to him his

long official career, his immense parliamentary experience. Recollect

that John Henry Temple, Viscount Palmerston, has sat in Parliament for

half a century, was Secretary-at-War while Wellington was yet wrestling

with Napoleon’s marshals in Spain, was one of the authors of the “New

Whig Guide,” has formed part of scores of administrations; and—one

of the hardest-worked men of his time—has yet found leasure to be a

beau and lion of fashion in Grosvenorian circles, and to be called

“Cupid”—Grosvenorian circles rather chap-fallen, crow’s-footed, rheumy

about the eyes by this time, rather fallen into the sere and yellow leaf,

now hessians and short waists have gone out, hoops and pegtops come in.

Drollest of all, to think that this smug elderly gentleman, voluble in

spite of tongue-clogging seventy, and jaunty in spite of evident gout,

but quite a decorous, father-of-family, select vestryman-looking ancient,

should be the “_terrible Palmerston_” the firebrand of the Continent, the

bugbear of foreign oligarchs, the grim “_Caballero Balmerson_” naming

whom Spanish contrabandistas cross themselves, the abhorred “Palmerstoni”

whom papal gensd’arme imagine to be an emerited brigand who has long

defied the pontifical authority from an inaccessible fastness in the

Apennines. I need not tell you anything more about his speech. You will

find it all in Hansard; and the newspapers of the day gave an accurate

summary of the cheers, the counter-cheers, the ironical cheers, the

“Hear, hears,” and the “Oh, oh’s” which accompanied the harangue,

together with the “loud and continuous cheering” (from his own side of

the House) which greeted its conclusion.

The longest lane, however, must have a turning; and this desperately long

drawn-out parliamentary avenue has its turning at last. There have been

frenzied shrieks of “Divide—divide!’ numerous bores who have essayed

to speak have been summarily shut up and coughed down; and at length

strangers are ordered to withdraw, and the division bell rings.

“On our re-admission,” we quote from the “Times” newspaper of 185—, the

results of the division were announced as follows:—

For the second reading of the bill 284

Against it 307

---

Majority against the Government 23

The bill was consequently lost.

Next day the Government presided over by the noble Viscount who wears

his hat, goes out of office—the “Times” giving it a graceful kick at

parting, and hinting that it was never anything more than a disreputable,

shameless, abandoned clique, whose nepotism had grown intolerable in the

nostrils of the nation. The Right Honourable Caucasian, who doesn’t wear

his hat, is sent for by a certain friend of his—a noble Earl, who is

generally considered a first-rate hand at making up a book for the Derby.

He in his turn is sent for by his Most Gracious Sovereign; and, for the

next three or four days, there is nothing but running about and getting

upstairs between Buckingham Palace, St. James’s Square, and Grosvenor

Gate; and at the end of that time, the right honourable Caucasian finds

himself snugly ensconced in Downing Street, with full liberty to wear his

gold robe again.

[Illustration: TWO O’CLOCK A.M.: THE TURNSTILE OF WATERLOO BRIDGE.]

Past, long past two in the morning. The much-suffering House of Commons

at last shut up, and deserted save by the police and the night watchmen.

The last cabs in Palace Yard driven away: the charioteers grumbling

horribly on their boxes, for they have members of Parliament inside, who

never pay more than the legal fare. Irish members walked round the corner

to Manchester Buildings or Victoria Street, there dwelling. Some members

do all but sleep in the House. As for the noble and defeated Viscount,

he trots cheerily home—scorning either cab or carriage—shouldering his

umbrella, as though nothing in the world had happened to ruffle his

equanimity.

* * * * *

And now, for the first time since this clock was set in motion, something

like a deep sleep falleth over London. Not that the city is all hushed;

it never is. There are night revellers abroad, night prowlers a-foot.

There is houseless wretchedness knowing not where to hide its head;

there is furtive crime stalking about, and seeking whom it may devour.

Yet all has a solemn, ghastly, unearthly aspect; the gas-lamps flicker

like corpse candles; and the distant scream of a profligate, in conflict

with the police, courses up and down the streets in weird and shuddering

echoes.

The Strand is so still that you may count the footsteps as they

sound; and the pale moon looks down pityingly on the vast, feverish,

semi-slumbering mass. Here we stand at length by Upper Wellington Street;

a minute’s walk to the right will bring us to the “Bridge of Sighs.”

Which never sleeps! Morning, and noon, and night, the sharp, clicking

turnstile revolves; the ever-wakeful tollman is there, with his

preternaturally keen apron. I call this man Charon, and the river which

his standing ferry bridges over might well be the Styx. Impossible,

immobile, indifferent, the gate-keeper’s creed is summed up in one

word—“A halfpenny!” Love, hope, happiness, misery, despair, and

death—what are they to him? “A halfpenny for the bridge” is all he asks!

but “a halfpenny for the bridge” he must have.

“Please, sir, will you give me a halfpenny for the bridge?” A phantom in

crinoline lays her hand on my arm. I start, and she hastens through the

turnstile—

“Anywhere, anywhere,

Out of the world,”

perhaps. But I may not linger on the mysteries of the Bridge of Sighs.

They are among the “Secrets of Gas,” and the pictured semblance of the

place here must content you.

HOUR THE TWENTY-FOURTH AND LAST—THREE A.M.—A BAL MASQUE, AND THE NIGHT

CHARGES AT BOW STREET.

When the bad Lord Lyttelton lay on his last bed—thorn-strewn by

conscience—and haunted by the awful prediction of the phantom which

appeared to him in the semblance of a white dove, telling him that at a

certain hour on a certain night he should die, some friends who had a

modicum of human feeling, and wished that wicked lord well, thinking that

his agony was caused by mere terror of an impending event—half nervous,

half superstitious—advanced the hands of the clock One Hour, and when

the fatal one, as it seemed, struck, his Lordship started up in bed,

apparently much relieved, and cried out joyfully that he had “jockeyed

the ghost.” But when the _real time_ arrived, and the _real hour_ was

stricken on the bell, the prediction of the white dove was verified, and

the bad Lord Lyttelton, shrieking, gave up the ghost.

Moral: there is not the slightest use in playing tricks with the clock.

Were it otherwise, and were I not deterred by this awful warning in the

case of Lord Lyttelton, I would entreat some kindly friend to stand on

tiptoe, and just push the hour-hand of this clock of mine back, were it

but for one poor _stunde_ of sixty minutes. But in vain. As well ask Mr.

Calcraft to postpone his quarter-to-eight visit with a new rope, when the

law has consigned you to the tender mercies of that eminent functionary.

As well may Crown Prince Frederick entreat the Governor of Cüstrin to

defer the execution of wretched Lieutenant Katte, “till he can write to

the king.” As well may the unfortunate little Pants, hopelessly embroiled

for the fifth time this morning with his Greek Delectus, implore the

terrible Doctor Budd to spare him the rod this once. As well might I

write to the Postmaster-General to say that it will not be convenient for

me to deposit the last batch of newspapers in the window till half-past

six p.m.; or beg the London and North-Western Railway Company to delay

the departure of the Manchester night express till I have finished my

wine and walnuts at the Victoria Hotel, Euston Square. The fiat has gone

forth. _Missa est._ Judgment is over, and execution is come; and I may

say, with Lord Grizzle in “Tom Thumb:”

“My bodye is a bankrupt’s shop,

My grim creditor is death,”

who, like a stern sergeant, lays his hand on my collar, and bids me

follow him to jail in the king’s name. I wish I were Punch, for he not

only “jockeyed” the ghost, but the hangman, and the beadle, and Mr.

Shallabalah, and his wife, and the very deuce himself. I wish I were in a

land where time is indeed made for slaves, or where there are no clocks

to cast honest men off their hobbies.

“I wish I were a geese,

For they lives and dies in peace,

And accumulates much grease,

Over there.”

But I am not a Punch nor a “geese,” to endorse the touching transatlantic

locution, however much I may merit the singular application of the name.

I am only your humble servant to command, and this is the last hour of

“Twice Round the Clock,” so I must e’en essay to make a good end of it.

We have not been so badly off for public amusements during

our journeyings. We have been to the opera, to the theatre, a

dancing-academy, and to hear an oratorio. We have supped at Evans’s, and

“assisted” at a late debate in the House of Commons; yet I acknowledge,

mournfully, that scores of places of recreation exist in London to which

I could have taken you, and where we might have enjoyed ourselves very

rationally and harmlessly. I should have liked to induct you to the

mysteries of Canterbury Hall, the Polytechnic, Christy’s Minstrels,

and Madame Tussaud’s waxwork show. For I hold to this creed, sternly

and strongly, that public amusements—indoor and outdoor amusements—are

eminently conducive to public _morals_, and to the liberty and happiness

of the people. Music, dancing, and dramatic representations, free from

grossness and turbulence, are as healthful and innocent recreations as

Temperance Halls, lectures on the comet’s tail, or monster meetings

dedicated to the deification of the _odium theologicum_. From my little

parlour window at Brighton, I can see a huge yellow placard disfiguring

a dead wall with this inscription:—“Protestants! attend the Great

Meeting to-night!” Bother the Protestants, (on platforms) I say, and the

Pope of Rome too. What have we done that we are to be perpetually set

together by the ears by belligerent Protestants and rampant Romanists?

Is the whole framework of society to be shaken by controversies about

the cardinal’s red stockings or the rector’s shovel hat? They had best

both be swept into the dust-hole, I think, as having no more to do with

religion than my poodle, Buffo, has with the Gunpowder Plot. Will all

these roaring meetings—Protestants and Romanist, or Mumbo-Jumboical—where

blatant stump-orators, paid for their theology by the night, rant, and

stamp, and cook up those eternal Smithfield fires, help the sacred cause

of Christianity one iota? It is long since Sheridan expressed a hope that

there might be no more “scandal about Queen Elizabeth,” and now, I see,

they can’t let that poor old woman rest in her grave. Some zealous people

want to get up a sort of rider to “Guy Fawkes’s Day,” to commemorate the

tri-centenary of her accession. You stupid firebrands! Of course “the

Reformation was a blessing;” but do you know what will be the result of

this raking up of the Elizabethan scandal? Do you know that there are

such books as “Cobbett’s Legacy to Parsons,” and “Lingard’s History,”

besides “Foxe’s Martyrs,” and a “Thunderbolt for Rome”? Do you know that

it may be proved just six of one and half-a-dozen of the other about

Queen Bess? that while to some she is the Great Protestant Sovereign, the

Egeria of the Reformation, the Heroine of Tilbury Fort, to others she

is a vain, cruel, arrogant old beldame, no better than she should be?

who butchered Mary Stuart, and had Leicester poisoned; and who for every

Protestant her gloomy sister burned, had at least two Papists hanged,

drawn, and quartered, with the pleasant addition of their entrails

being torn out and consumed before their eyes! _Eh! laissons la_ these

horrible reminiscences, and thank Heaven that we live under the sway of

good Victoria, not that of ruthless Elizabeth or bloody Mary. Did the

wise, and merciful, and bounteous Creator, who made this smiling earth,

who has gladdened us with an infinity of good things for our solace and

enjoyment, and for all quit-rent has laid this law upon us that we should

love one another, in testimony of our greatest love for Him, who is

all love and tenderness; did He send us here to squabble and fight and

predict eternal perdition to one another, because there fall into our

hearts a differently-coloured ray of the divine Effulgence? There is a

flaming Protestant here with a broad-brimmed hat, and who is a vessel of

much consequence among his fellow-bigots, who told an honest butcher some

days since that if the Maynooth grant were renewed we should have “the

thumbscrews in three months;” whereupon the affrighted butcher plastered

all his joints over with handbills of the great Protestant Meeting, thus,

of course, losing all his customers of the other persuasion. I wish those

bells which are eternally jangling invitations for us to come and thank

Heaven that we are not “as that publican,” would ring a little tolerance

and charity into men’s hearts; would ring out a little more oblivion

of phylacteries and pew-rents in high places, and of the sepulchral

whitewash brushes. If the people who make all this noise and clamour,

and who howl out against rational amusements, led pure and virtuous

lives, and set good examples to their neighbours, this voice should not

be raised; but, alas! here is brother Dolorous at the bar of the court

of Queen’s Bench for peculation; here is Sister Saintly scourging her

apprentice; here are Messrs. Over-righteous in trouble for adulteration

of their wares.

It is by no means incompatible, I hope, with the broad line of argument

I have striven to adopt in these papers, if I honestly declare that the

tableau I am about to describe has not in any way my approval, nay is, in

many respects, much to be reprobated and deplored. I describe it—in its

least repulsive details—simply because it is a very noticeable feature

in modern London life. To have passed it over would have been dishonest

and hypocritical, and I set it down in my catalogue of subjects at the

outset of my task, actuated then, as I am now, by a determination to

allow no squeamishness to interfere with the delineation of the truth—so

long as that truth could be told without offence to good manners and

in household language. A modern masquerade in London is, to tell the

honest truth, anything but an edifying spectacle. There is certainly no

perceptible harm in some hundreds of persons, of both sexes, accoutred

in more or less fantastic dresses, meeting together in a handsome

theatre, and, to the music of a magnificent band, dancing till three

or four o’clock in the morning. But the place is not harmless: people

go there to dissipate, and _do_ dissipate. The _salle de danse_ of a

grand masquerade is a re-union of epicurean passions—an epitome of vice

painted and spangled. And I take a masquerade triumphantly as an argument

against the precisians and sour-faces, who would curtail the amusements

of the people, and viciously thwart them in their every effort to amuse

themselves. Look you here, gentlemen of the vestry—arch moralists of the

parish! look you here, good Mr. Chaplain of Pentonville, who have got

your pet garotter safe in hold for his sins! This is no penny-gaff, no

twopenny theatre, no cheap concert or dancing academy—not so much as a

“free-and-easy” or a “sixpenny hop.” Shopboys don’t rob the till to come

to a _bal masqué_ at her Majesty’s Theatre. Your pet garotter didn’t

throttle the gentleman in the Old Kent Road in order to procure funds to

dance with Mademoiselle Euphrosine de la Galette, of the Rue Nôtre Dame

de Lorette, Paris, and attired in a ravishing _débardeur_ costume. There

is, to be sure, a floating population of Bohemians—citizens of the world

of London, belonging to the theatres, _enfants perdus_ of the newspaper

press, and so on, who are admitted gratis to a masquerade: these last

Zouaves of social life, have free admission to coroners’ inquests, public

dinners, ship launches, private views of picture exhibitions, night

rehearsals of pantomimes, and royal marriages. The modern newspaper man

is, in print, the embodiment of Mr. Everybody; in private he is Mr.

Nobody, and doesn’t count at all. Lord Derby is afraid of the journalist

in print, but in the flesh his Lordship’s footman would look down upon

him. “Honly a littery man, let him knock agin,” Jeames would say. So we

go everywhere, even as though we were in the “receipt of fern seed.” Even

the House of Commons has invented a pleasant fiction for the benefit of

the gentlemen of the press, and humorously ignores their presence during

the debates. The Empress Julia bathed before her male slave. “Call _that_

a man,” she cried, contemptuously. In the like manner, no account is

taken of the journalist’s extra card of admission or extra knife and

fork. He goes under the head of “sundries,” though he makes sometimes a

rather formidable figure in the aggregate.

But to the general public—the social Zouaves are but a drop of water in

the sea—a _bal masqué_ is a very expensive affair, and a luxury not to be

indulged in without a liberal disbursement of cash. First, ticket, half

a guinea. Mademoiselle de la Galette’s ticket, if you be _galant homme_,

five shillings more, if she be in costume; half a guinea if in domino.

Next, costume for yourself, variable according to its extravagance—a

guinea at least. At any rate, if you are content to appear in plain

evening dress, there are clean white kid gloves and patent leather

boots to be purchased. And the supper; and the wine, for champagne

is _de rigueur_, at twelve and fifteen shillings a bottle! (You will

observe that whenever I grow fashionably dissipated, I begin to chatter

French.) And Mademoiselle de la Galette’s _bouquet_, and the intermediate

refreshments, ices, coffee, lemonade, and what-not; and the cabs and the

wild revelry in the wicked Haymarket purlieus afterwards. You see I

have led you to the very end of the chapter, and that a night at a _bal

masqué_ will make an irremediable hole in a ten-pound note.

For this reason the persons (of the male sex) who visit such a gathering

must be divided into three classes: theatrical and literary nobodies,

coming there for nothing and not caring much about the place now they

are come; young bucks about the town with more money than wit, who will

exist, I am afraid, in every civilised age; and lastly and chiefly,

the “Swells.” I use the term advisedly, for none other can so minutely

characterise them. Long, stern, solemn, languid, with drooping tawny

moustaches, with faultlessly made habiliments, with irreproachable white

neckcloths, with eyes half-closed, with pendant arms, with feet enclosed

in mirror-like patent boots, the “swells” saunter listlessly through the

ball-room with a quiet consciousness that all these dazzling frivolities

are provided for their special gratification—which indeed they are. As

it is _l’œil du maître qui engraisse le cheval_, so it is the “swell”

who makes the _bal masqué_ pay. Never so many orders may Mr. Nugent give

away; but if the “swell” be not in town or muster not in force on the

eventful night, there will be wailing in her Majesty’s Theatre, and woe

in M. Jullien’s cash-box. It must be somewhat of a strong till that can

stand this _tiraillement_. As regards the ladies who are the partners

in the mazy dance of these splendid cavaliers, I may say, once for all,

that they are Daughters of Folly; Mademoiselle de la Galette and her

condisciples, English and French, are there, multiplied five-hundred

fold. I don’t think your pet garotter, good Mr. Chaplain, would be very

successful as a Hercules at the feet of these Omphales.

[Illustration: THREE O’CLOCK A.M.: A BAL MASQUE.]

I wonder how many sons and scions, or cousins or nephews, or

multitudinous misty offshoots of the titled men who govern us, who own

our lands, our waters, and the birds of the air, the beasts of the

field, and the fish of the sea, are here. I wonder how many threads of

connection there are in this ball-room theatre between these butterflies

and the ermine and the lawn of the House of Peers. How many, how much?

Bah! There is young Reginald Fitzmitre, the Bishop of Bosfursus’s son,

talking to that charming _titi_ in the striped silk skirt and crimson

satin trousers. Reginald is in the Guards. Bishops’ sons are fond of

going into the Guards. Yonder is little Pulex, whose brother, Tapely

Pulex, is Under-Secretary for the Egregious Department. There Lord Claude

Miffin has just stalked in with Sir Charles Shakeypegs (who is old enough

to know better); and upon my word, here comes that venerable sinner

Lord Holloway, with little Fanny Claypainter on his arm. It won’t do,

my Lord; you may disguise yourself as closely as you will in a domino

and a mask with a long lace beard, but I know you by that side-wise

waggle of your Lordship’s head. The Earl of Holloway has been a very

gay nobleman in his time. He married Miss Redpoll, the famous English

_contraltro_, drew her theatrical salary with very great punctuality

every Saturday afternoon at three o’clock, and beat her, people said. He

was the honourable Jack Pilluler then. Years elapsed before he came into

the title and Unguenton Park. _She_ died. Advance, then—advance then, my

noble swells—to adopt the style of the gentlemen with the thimble and

pea. Advance, this is all for your delectation. Meanwhile, let your most

noble and right reverend fathers, brothers, uncles, and cousins meet

in either House of Parliament, meet at Quarter Sessions, or on borough

bench, and make or expound laws against the wicked, thriftless, hardened,

incorrigibly dissipated Poor. No beer for them, the rogues! No fairs,

no wakes, no village feasts, no harvest-homes, no theatres, concerts,

dances, no tobacco, no rabbits, no bowls, no cricket—but plenty of law,

and plenty of nice hard labour, and wholesome gruel, and strengthening

stone-breaking, and plenty of your sweet aristocratic wives and daughters

to force their way into poor men’s cottages, ask them questions for

which I wonder they don’t get their ears boxed, pry into their domestic

concerns, peep into their cupboards, and wonder at their improvidence in

not having more to eat and drink therein.

Stand we in the orchestral hemicycle, and watch the garish, motley scene.

Questions of morality apart, one must have jaundiced eyes to deny that,

as a mere spectacle, it is brilliant and picturesque enough. All that

M. Jullien’s _bizarre_ taste and fancy could suggest, or the cunning

skill of experienced scenic decorators carry out, has been done here

to make the place gay, dazzling, and effective. Wreaths of artificial

flowers, reflecting the highest credit upon the paper-stainer and the

paper-cutter’s art, mask the somewhat _fanées_ ornaments of the tiers of

boxes; homely corridors and staircases are pleasantly disguised under a

plentitude of scarlet baize and drugget; the chandelier is of abnormous

size, for any number of glittering festoons have been added to its

crystal abacot; devices in glass and devices in gas twinkle and radiate

on every side: nor is music’s voluptuous swell wanting to incite us to

“chase the glowing hours with flying feet,” and make all things go “merry

as a marriage bell.”

Twice round the clock; or, The hours of the day and night in London · 第 35 / 37 段