SPECULATION AND HISTORY.

I shall not live to behold the unravelling of the intricate plot which

saddens and perplexes the awful drama of Providence now acting on the

moral theatre of the world. Whether for thought or for action, I am at

the end of my career. You are in the middle of yours. In what part of

its orbit the nation, with which we are carried along, moves at this

instant, it is not easy to conjecture. It may, perhaps, be far advanced

in its aphelion.--But when to return?

Not to lose ourselves in the infinite void of the conjectural world, our

business is with what is likely to be affected, for the better or the

worse, by the wisdom or weakness of our plans. In all speculations upon

men and human affairs, it is of no small moment to distinguish things of

accident from permanent causes, and from effects that cannot be altered.

It is not every irregularity in our movement that is a total deviation

from our course. I am not quite of the mind of those speculators who

seem assured that, necessarily, and by the constitution of things, all

states have the same periods of infancy, manhood, and decrepitude that

are found in the individuals who compose them. Parallels of this sort

rather furnish similitudes to illustrate or to adorn, than supply

analogies from whence to reason. The objects which are attempted to be

forced into an analogy are not found in the same classes of existence.

Individuals are physical beings subject to laws universal and

invariable. The immediate cause acting in these laws may be obscure; the

general results are subjects of certain calculation. But commonwealths

are not physical but moral essences. They are artificial combinations,

and, in their proximate efficient cause, the arbitrary productions

of the human mind. We are not yet acquainted with the laws which

necessarily influence the stability of that kind of work made by that

kind of agent. There is not in the physical order (with which they do

not appear to hold any assignable connection) a distinct cause by which

any of those fabrics must necessarily grow, flourish, or decay; nor, in

my opinion, does the moral world produce anything more determinate on

that subject than what may serve as an amusement (liberal, indeed, and

ingenious, but still only an amusement) for speculative men. I doubt

whether the history of mankind is yet complete enough, if ever it can

be so, to furnish grounds for a sure theory on the internal causes which

necessarily affect the fortune of a state. I am far from denying the

operation of such causes: but they are infinitely uncertain and much

more obscure, and much more difficult to trace, than the foreign causes

that tend to raise, to depress, and sometimes to overwhelm, a community.

It is often impossible in these political inquiries to find any

proportion between the apparent force of any moral causes we may assign

and their known operation. We are therefore obliged to deliver up that

operation to mere chance, or, more piously (perhaps, more rationally),

to the occasional interposition and irresistible hand of the Great

Disposer. We have seen states of considerable duration, which for ages

have remained nearly as they have begun, and could hardly be said to ebb

or flow. Some appear to have spent their vigour at their commencement.

Some have blazed out in their glory a little before their extinction.

The meridian of some has been the most splendid. Others, and they the

greatest number, have fluctuated, and experienced at different periods

of their existence a great variety of fortune. At the very moment when

some of them seemed plunged in unfathomable abysses of disgrace and

disaster, they have suddenly emerged. They have begun a new course and

opened a new reckoning; and, even in the depths of their calamity,

and on the very ruins of their country, have laid the foundations of

a towering and durable greatness. All this has happened without any

apparent previous change in the general circumstances which had brought

on their distress. The death of a man at a critical juncture, his

disgust, his retreat, his disgrace, have brought innumerable calamities

on a whole nation. A common soldier, a child, a girl at the door of an

inn, have changed the face of fortune, and almost of nature.

Such, and often influenced by such causes, has commonly been the fate of

monarchies of long duration. They have their ebbs and their flows. This

has been eminently the fate of the monarchy of France. There have been

times in which no power has ever been brought so low. Few have ever

flourished in greater glory. By turns elevated and depressed, that power

had been, on the whole, rather on the increase; and it continued not

only powerful but formidable to the hour of the total ruin of the

monarchy. This fall of the monarchy was far from being preceded by any

exterior symptoms of decline. The interior were not visible to every

eye; and a thousand accidents might have prevented the operation of what

the most clear-sighted were not able to discern, nor the most provident

to divine. A very little time before its dreadful catastrophe there

was a kind of exterior splendour in the situation of the Crown, which

usually adds to government strength and authority at home. The Crown

seemed then to have obtained some of the most splendid objects of state

ambition. None of the continental powers of Europe were the enemies

of France. They were all either tacitly disposed to her, or publicly

connected with her; and in those who kept the most aloof there was

little appearance of jealousy; of animosity there was no appearance

at all. The British nation, her great preponderating rival; she had

humbled; to all appearance she had weakened; certainly had endangered,

by cutting off a very large, and by far the most growing part of her

empire. In that its acme of human prosperity and greatness, in the high

and palmy state of the monarchy of France, it fell to the ground without

a struggle. It fell without any of those vices in the monarch which have

sometimes been the causes of the fall of kingdoms, but which existed,

without any visible effect on the state, in the highest degree in many

other princes; and, far from destroying their power, had only left some

slight stains on their character. The financial difficulties were only

pretexts and instruments of those who accomplished the ruin of that

monarchy. They were not the causes of it.

Deprived of the old government, deprived in a manner of all government,

France, fallen as a monarchy, to common speculators might have appeared

more likely to be an object of pity or insult, according to the

disposition of the circumjacent powers, than to be the scourge and

terror of them all: but out of the tomb of the murdered monarchy in

France has arisen a vast, tremendous unformed spectre, in a far more

terrific guise than any which ever yet have overpowered the imagination

and subdued the fortitude of man. Going straight forward to its end,

unappalled by peril, unchecked by remorse, despising all common maxims

and all common means, that hideous phantom overpowered those who could

not believe it was possible she could at all exist, except on the

principles which habit rather than nature had persuaded them were

necessary to their own particular welfare, and to their own ordinary

modes of action. But the constitution of any political being, as well as

that of any physical being, ought to be known, before one can venture to

say what is fit for its conservation, or what is the proper means of its

power. The poison of other states is the food of the new republic. That

bankruptcy, the very apprehension of which is one of the causes assigned

for the fall of the monarchy, was the capital on which she opened her

traffic with the world.

Selections from the Speeches and Writings of Edmund Burke · 第 274 / 361 题