1. Endless variety in connection with exhaustless vigour of mind.

2. A lofty power of generalisation, both in speculative views and in his

argumentative process.

3. Vivid intensity of conception, which caused abstractions to stand

out with almost living force and visible feature, in his impassioned

moments.

4. An imagination of oriental luxuriance, whose incessant play in

tropes, metaphors, and analogies, frequently causes his speeches to

gleam on the intellectual eye, as Aeschylus says the ocean does, when

the Sun irradiates its bosom with the "anerithmon gelasma" of countless

beams. 5. His positive acquirements in all the varied realms of art,

science, and literature, endowed him with such vast funds of knowledge

(In the wealth of his multitudinous acquirements, Burke seems to realise

Cicero's ideal of what a perfect orator should know:--"Equidem omnia,

quae pertinent ad usum civium, morem hominum, quae versantur in

consuetudine vitae, in ratione reipublicae, in hac societate civili, in

sensu hominum communi, in natura, in moribus, co hendenda esse oratori

puto."--Cicero "De Orat." lib. ii. cap. 16.), that Johnson declared of

Burke--"Enter upon what subject you will, and Burke is ready to meet

you."

6. In addition to these high gifts, may be added, an ability to wield

the weapons of sarcasm and irony, with a keenness of application and

effect rarely equalled. But, in all candour, it may be added, that just

as a profusion of figures and metaphors sometimes tempted this great

orator into incongruous images and coarse analogies, so his passion for

irony was occasionally too intense. Hence, there are occasions where

his pungency is embittered into acrimony, strength degenerates into

vulgarism, and the vehemence of satire is infuriated with the fierceness

of invective.

7. With regard to language and style, it may be truly said, they were

the absolute vassals of his Genius, and did homage to its command in

every possible mode by which it chose to employ them. Thus, in his

"Letters on a Regicide Peace," and above all, in "French Revolutions,"

the reader will find almost every conceivable manner of style and

mode of expression the English language can develop; and what is

more,--together with classical richness, there are also the pointed

seriousness and persuasive simplicity of our own vernacular Saxon, which

increase the attractions of Burke's style to a wonderful extent. But,

beyond controversy, among these great endowments, the imaginative

faculty is that which appears to be the most transcendent in the mental

constitution of Burke. And so truly is this the case, that both among

his contemporaries, as well as among his successors, this predominance

of imagination has caused his just claims as a philosophic thinker and

statesman to be partially overlooked. The union of ideal theory and

practical realisation, of imaginative creation with logical induction,

is indeed so rare, we cannot be surprised at the injustice which the

genius of Burke has had to endure in this respect. And yet, in the

nature of our faculties themselves, there exists no necessity why a

vivid power to conceive ideas, should NOT be combined with a dialectic

skill in expressing them. Degerando, an admirable French writer, in one

of his Treatises, has some profound observations on this subject; and

does not hesitate to define poetry itself as a species of "logique

cachee."

But when we assert that these excellencies, which have thus been

succinctly exhibited, characterise the mental constitution of Burke,

we do not mean that others have not, in their degree, possessed similar

endowments. Such an inference would be an absurd extravagance. But what

we mean to affirm is--the qualifications enumerated have never been

combined into co-operative harmony, and developed in proportionable

effect, as they appear in the speeches and writings of this wonderful

man. But after all, we have not reached what may be considered a

peerless excellence, the peculiar gift,--the one great and glorious

distinction, which separates Burke's oratory from that of all others,

and which has caused his speeches to be blended with political History,

and to incorporate themselves with the moral destiny of Europe,--namely,

HIS INTUITIVE PERCEPTION OF UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLES. The truth of this

statement may be verified, by comparing the eloquence of Burke with

specimens of departed orators; or by a reference to existing standards

in the parliamentary debates. Compared, then, either with the speeches

of Chatham, Holland, Pitt, Fox, etc. etc., we perceive at once the grand

distinction to which we refer. These illustrious men were effective

debaters, and, in various senses, orators of surpassing excellency.

But how is it, that with all their allowed grandeur of intellect and

political eminence, they have ceased to operate upon the hearts and

minds of the present Age, either as teachers of political Truth, or

oracles of legislative Wisdom? Simply, BECAUSE they were too popular in

temporary effect, ever to become influential by permanent inspiration.

In their highest moods, and amid their noblest hours of triumph, they

were "of the earth earthy." Party; personality; crushing rejoinders,

or satirical attacks; a felicitous exposure of inconsistency, or

a triumphant self-vindication; brilliant repartees, and logical

gladiatorship,--such are among the prominent characteristics which

caused parliamentary debates in Burke's day to be so animating and

interesting to those who heard, or perused them, amid the excitements of

the hour. It is not to be denied that commanding eloquence, vast genius,

political ardour, intellectual enthusiasm, together with indignant

denunciation and argumentative subtlety, were thus summoned into

exercise by the perils of the Nation, and the contentions of Party.

Nevertheless, the local, the temporal, the conventional, and the

individual, in all which relates to the science of politics or the

tactics of partisanship,--are sufficient to excite and employ the

energies and qualities which made the general parliamentary debates of

Burke's period so captivating. But when we revert to his own speeches

and writings, we at once perceive WHY, as long as the mind can

comprehend what is true, the heart appreciate what is pure, or the

conscience authenticate the sanction of heaven and the distinctions

between right and wrong,--Edmund Burke will continue to be admired,

revered, and consulted, not only as the greatest of English orators,

but as the profoundest teacher of political Science. It was not that he

despised the arrangement of facts, or overlooked the minutiae of

detail; on the contrary, as may be proved by his speeches on "economical

reform," and Warren Hastings; in these respects his research was

boundless, and his industry inexhaustible. Moreover, he was quite alive

to the claims of a crisis, and with the coolness and calm of a practical

statesman, knew how to confront a sudden emergency, and to contend

with a gigantic difficulty. Yet all these qualifications recede before

Burke's amazing power of expanding particulars into universals, and of

associating the accidents of a transient discussion with the essential

properties of some permanent Law in policy, or abstract Truth in morals.

His genius looked through the local to the universal; in the temporal

perceived the eternal; and while facing the features of the Individual,

was enabled to contemplate the attributes of a Race. (Cicero, in many

respects a counterpart of Burke, both in statesmanship and oratory,

appears to recognise what is here expressed when he says:--"Plerique

duo genera ad dicendum dederunt; UNUM DE CERTA DEFINITAQUE CAUSA, quales

sunt quae in litibus, quae in deliberationibus versantur;--alterum, quod

appellant omnes fere scriptores, explicat nemo, INFINITAM GENERIS SINE

TEMPORE, ET SINE PERSONA quaestionem."--"De Orat." lib. ii. cap. 15.)

Hence his speeches are virtual prophecies; and his writings a storehouse

of pregnant axioms and predictive enunciations, as limitless in

their range as they are undying in duration. In one word, no speeches

delivered in the English Parliament, are so likely to be eternalized

as Burke's, because he has combined with his treatment of some especial

case or contingency before him, the assertion of immutable Principles,

which can be detached from what is local and national, and thus made

to stand forth alone in all the naked grandeur of their truth and

their tendency. Let us be permitted to investigate this topic a little

further. If, then, what Quintilian asserted of the Roman orator may

be applied to our own British Cicero,--"Ille se profecisse sciat, cui

Cicero valde placebit;" and if, moreover, this pre-eminence be chiefly

discovered in Burke's instinctive grasp of that moral essence which

is incorporated with all questions of political Science, and social

Ethics--from WHENCE came this diviner energy of his Genius? No believer

in Christian revelation will hesitate to appropriate, even to this

subject, the apostolic axiom, "EVERY good gift, and EVERY perfect gift

is from above." But while we subscribe with reverential sincerity to

this announcement, it is equally true, that the Infinite Inspirer of

all good adjusts His secret energies by certain laws, and condescends

to work by analogous means. Bearing this in mind, we venture to think

Burke's gift of almost prescient insight into the recesses of our common

nature, and his consummate faculty of instructing the Future through the

medium of the Present,--were partly derived from the elevation of his

sentiments, and the purity of his private life. (The action and reaction

maintained between our moral and intellectual elements is but remotely

discussed by Quintilian in his "Institutes." But still, in more than

one passage, he most impressively declares, that mental proficiency is

greatly retarded by perversity of heart and will. For instance, on one

occasion we find him speaking thus:--"Nihil enim est tam occupatum, tam

multiforme, tot ac tam variis affectibus concisum, atque laceratum, quam

mala ac improba mens. Quis inter haec, literis, aut ulli bonae arti,

locus? Non hercle magis quam frugibus, in terra sentibus ac rubis

occupata."--"Nothing is so flurried and agitated, so self-contradictory,

or so violently rent and shattered by conflicting passions, as a bad

heart. In the distractions which it produces, what room is there for

the cultivation of letters, or the pursuits of any honourable art?

Assuredly, no more than there is for the growth of corn in a field

overrun with thorns and brambles.") It would be unwise to draw invidious

comparisons, but no student of the period in which Burke was in

Parliament, can deny that, compared with SOME of his illustrious

contemporaries, he was indeed a model of what reason and conscience

alike approve in all the relative duties and personal conduct of a man,

when beheld in his domestic career. It is, indeed, a source of deep

thankfulness, the admirer of Burke's genius in public, has no reason to

blush for his character in private; and that when we have listened to

his matchless oratory upon the arena of the House of Commons, we have

not to mourn over dissipation, impurity, and depravity amid the

circles of private history. Our theory, then, is, that beyond what

his distinctive genius inspired, Burke's wondrous power of enunciating

everlasting principles and of associating the loftiest abstractions

of wisdom with the commonest themes of the hour,--was sustained and

strengthened by the purity of his heart, and the subjection of passion

to the law of conscience. And if the worshippers of mere intellect,

apart from, or as opposed to, moral elevation, are inclined to ridicule

this view of Burke's genius, we beg to remind them, that "One greater

than the Temple" of mortal Wisdom, and all the idols enshrined therein,

has asserted a positive connection to exist between mental insight and

moral purity. We allude to the Redeemer's words, when He declares,--"If

any man WILLS to do His will, he shall KNOW of the doctrine." HOW the

passions act upon our perceptions, and by what process the motions of

the Will elevate or depress the forces of the Intellect, is beyond

our metaphysics to analyse. But that there exists a real, active, and

influential connection between our moral and mental life, is undeniable:

and since Burke's power of seizing the essential Idea, or fundamental

Principle of every complex detail which came before him, was

pre-eminently his gift,--the intellectual insight such gift developed,

was not only an expression of senatorial wisdom, but also a witness for

the elevation of his moral character. We must now allude to the public

conduct of Burke, as a Statesman and Politician, and only regret the

limited range of a popular essay confines us to one view, namely, his

alleged inconsistency. There WAS a period when charges of apostasy were

brought against him with reckless audacity: but Time, the instructor of

ignorance, and the subduer of prejudice, is now beginning to place the

conduct of Burke in its true light. The facts of the case are briefly

these. Up to the period of 1791, Fox and Burke fought in the same rank

of opposition, and stood together upon a basis of complete identity in

principle and sentiment. But even before the celebrated disruption of

1791, the progress of Republicanism in America, and the approaching

separation of the colonies from their parent state, Burke's views of

political liberty had received extensive modifications; and the ardour

of his confidence in the so-called friends of freedom had been greatly

cooled. But in 1791, the disruption between Burke and Fox became open,

absolute, and final, when the latter statesman uttered, in the hearing

of his friend, this fearful eulogium on the French Revolution:--"The new

constitution of France is the most stupendous and glorious edifice of

liberty which had been erected on the foundation of human integrity

in any age or country!" (That ancient Sage unto whose political wisdom

frequent reference has been made in this essay, thus speaks on the

reverence due unto an existing government, even when contemplated from

its weakest side:--"Formidable as these arguments seem, they may be

opposed by others of not less weight; arguments which prove that even

the rust of government is to be respected, and that its fabric is never

to be touched but with a fearful and trembling hand. When the evil of

persevering in hereditary institutions is small, it ought always to

be endured, because the evil of departing from them is certainly very

great. Slight imperfections, therefore, whether in the laws themselves,

or in those who administer and execute the laws, ought always to be

overlooked, because they cannot be corrected without occasioning a much

greater mischief, and tending to weaken that reverence which the safety

of all governments requires that the citizens at large should entertain,

cultivate, and cherish for the hereditary institutions of their country.

The comparison drawn from the improvement of arts does not apply to the

amendment of laws. To change or improve an art, and to alter or amend a

law, are things as dissimilar in their operation as different in their

tendency; for laws operate as practical principles of moral action; and,

like all the rules of morality, derive their force and efficacy, as even

the name imports, from the customary repetition of habitual acts, and

the slow operation of time. Every alteration of the laws, therefore,

tends to subvert that authority on which the persuasive agency of all

laws is founded, and to abridge, weaken, and destroy the power of the

law itself."--Aristotle's "Politics.") The reply of Burke to this burst

of Jacobinism, with all its consequences in the political history of

Europe, is far too well known to be quoted here. But, since it was at

this point in the career of Burke the charge of apostasy was commenced,

and which has never quite died away, even in existing times, we may be

permitted, first, to cite a noble passage from Burke's self-vindication;

and secondly, to adduce a still more impressive evidence of his

political rectitude and wisdom, derived from the admission of those who

were once his uncompromising opponents. In relation to the attacks of

Fox upon his supposed inconsistency, Mr. Burke thus replies:--

"I pass to the next head of charge,--Mr. Burke's inconsistency. It is

certainly a great aggravation of his fault in embracing false opinions,

that in doing so he is not supposed to fill up a void, but that he is

guilty of a dereliction of opinions that are true and laudable. This is

the great gist of the charge against him. It is not so much that he is

wrong in his book (that however is alleged also), as that he has therein

belied his whole life. I believe, if he could venture to value himself

upon anything, it is on the virtue of consistency that he would value

himself the most. Strip him of this, and you leave him naked indeed.

"In the case of any man who had written something, and spoken a great

deal, upon very multifarious matter, during upwards of twenty-five

years' public service, and in as great a variety of important events as

perhaps have ever happened in the same number of years, it would appear

a little hard, in order to charge such a man with inconsistency, to see

collected by his friend, a sort of digest of his sayings, even to such

as were merely sportive and jocular. This digest, however, has been

made, with equal pains and partiality, and without bringing out those

passages of his writings which might tend to show with what restrictions

any expressions, quoted from him, ought to have been understood. From a

great statesman he did not quite expect this mode of inquisition. If

it only appeared in the works of common pamphleteers, Mr. Burke might

safely trust to his reputation. When thus urged, he ought, perhaps, to

do a little more. It shall be as little as possible, for I hope not much

is wanting. To be totally silent on his charges would not be respectful

to Mr. Fox. Accusations sometimes derive a weight from the persons who

make them, to which they are not entitled for their matter. "A man who,

among various objects of his equal regard, is secure of some, and full

of anxiety for the fate of others, is apt to go to much greater lengths

in his preference of the objects of his immediate solicitude than Mr.

Burke has ever done. A man so circumstanced often seems to undervalue,

to vilify, almost to reprobate and disown, those that are out of danger.

This is the voice of nature and truth, and not of inconsistency and

false pretence. The danger of anything very dear to us removes, for the

moment, every other affection from the mind. When Priam had his whole

thoughts employed on the body of his Hector, he repels with indignation,

and drives from him with a thousand reproaches, his surviving sons, who

with an officious piety crowded about him to offer their assistance. A

good critic (there is no better than Mr. Fox) would say, that this is a

master-stroke, and marks a deep understanding of nature in the father of

poetry. He would despise a Zoilus, who would conclude from this passage

that Homer meant to represent this man of affliction as hating, or being

indifferent and cold in his affections to the poor relics of his house,

or that he preferred a dead carcass to his living children.

"Mr. Burke does not stand in need of an allowance of this kind,

which, if he did, by candid critics ought to be granted to him. If the

principles of a mixed constitution be admitted, he wants no more to

justify to consistency everything he has said and done during the course

of a political life just touching to its close. I believe that gentleman

has kept himself more clear of running into the fashion of wild,

visionary theories, or of seeking popularity through every means, than

any man perhaps ever did in the same situation.

"He was the first man who, on the hustings, at a popular election,

rejected the authority of instructions from constituents; or who, in any

place, has argued so fully against it. Perhaps the discredit into which

that doctrine of compulsive instructions under our constitution is since

fallen, may be due, in a great degree, to his opposing himself to it in

that manner, and on that occasion.

"The reformers in representation, and the Bills for shortening the

duration of Parliaments, he uniformly and steadily opposed for many

years together, in contradiction to many of his best friends. These

friends, however, in his better days, when they had more to hope from

his service and more to fear from his loss than now they have, never

chose to find any inconsistency between his acts and expressions in

favour of liberty, and his votes on those questions. But there is a time

for all things." We need not, however, confine our vindication of Burke

to his own eloquence, but invite the especial attention of his accusers

and defamers unto two forgotten facts: 1st. A few weeks before Fox died,

he dictated a despatch to Lord Yarmouth, which confirmed all the policy

for which Pitt for fifteen years had contended: moreover, in a debate

on Wyndham's "Military System," 1806, Fox thus delivered his own

recantation:--"Indeed, by the circumstances of Europe, I AM READY

TO CONFESS I HAVE BEEN WEANED FROM THE OPINIONS I FORMERLY HELD WITH

RESPECT TO THE FORCE WHICH MIGHT SUFFICE IN TIME OF PEACE: nor do I

consider this any inconsistency, because I see no rational prospect

of any peace, which would exempt us from the necessity of watchful

preparation and powerful establishment." But the change of Fox's

opinions, and their similarity to those maintained by Pitt, with

reference to our war with France, are by no means ALL which history can

produce in justification of Burke's political wisdom and consistency.

The whole civilized world has read the "Reflections on the French

Revolution," whose sale, in one year, achieved the enormous number of

30,000 copies, in connection with medals or marks of honour from almost

every Court in Europe. Now, of all the replies made to this masterpiece

of reasoning and reflection, Mackintosh's "Vindiciae Gallicae" was

incontestably the ablest and profoundest. And yet, the greatest of

all his intellectual opponents thus addresses Burke, as appears from

"Memoirs" of Mackintosh, volume i. page 87:--"The enthusiasm with which

I once embraced the instruction conveyed in your writings is now ripened

into solid conviction by the experience and conviction of more mature

age. For a time, SEDUCED BY THE LOVE OF WHAT I THOUGHT LIBERTY, I

ventured to oppose, without ceasing to venerate, that writer who

had nourished my understanding with the most wholesome principles

of political wisdom...Since that time, A MELANCHOLY EXPERIENCE HAS

UNDECEIVED ME ON MANY SUBJECTS, IN WHICH I WAS THE DUPE OF MY OWN

ENTHUSIASM." Let us part from this branch of our subject by quoting

Burke's own words, uttered, as it were, on the very brink of eternity.

They attest, to the latest moment of his life, with what a sacred

intensity and unflinching sincerity he clung to his original sentiments

touching the French Revolution. Nor let the present writer shrink

from adding, they constitute but one of the many specimens of that

instinctive prescience, whereby this profoundest of philosophical

statesmen was enabled to herald from afar the final triumphs of courage,

patriotism, and truth. The passage occurs towards the conclusion of his

"Letters on a Regicide Peace," and is as follows:--"Never succumb. It is

a struggle for your existence as a nation. If you must die, die with the

sword in your hand. But I have no fear whatever for the result. There

is a salient living principle of energy in the public mind of England,

which only requires proper direction to enable her to withstand this,

or any other ferocious foe. Persevere, therefore, till this tyranny be

over-past."

If from the glare of public history, we follow this great man into

the shades of domestic seclusion, or watch the features of his social

character unfolding themselves in the varied circle which he graced

by his presence, or dignified by his worth,--he is alike the object of

respectful esteem and love. Warmth of heart, chivalry of sentiment,

and that true high-breeding which springs from the soul rather than a

pedigree, eminently characterise the history of Burke in private life.

Above all, a sympathising tendency for the children of Genius, and a

catholic largeness of view in all which relates unto mental

effort, combined with the utmost charity for human failings and

infirmities,--cannot but endear him to our deepest affections, while his

unrivalled endowments command our highest admiration. To illustrate

what is here alluded to, let the reader recall Burke's noble generosity

towards that erratic victim of genius and grief,--the painter Barry; or

his instantaneous sympathy in behalf of Crabbe the poet, when almost a

foodless wanderer in our vast metropolis; and our estimate of Burke's

excellencies as a man, will not be deemed overdrawn.

It now remains for the selector of the following pages to offer a few

remarks on their nature, and design. Accustomed, from the earliest

period of his mental life to read and study the writings of Edmund

Burke, he has long wished that such a selection as now appears, should

be published. The works of Burke extend through a vast range of large

volumes; and it is feared thousands have been deterred from holding

communion with a master-spirit of British literature, by the magnitude

of his labours. Hence, a concentrated specimen of his intellect may not

only tempt the "reading public" (Coleridge's horror, yet an author's

friend!) to study some of Burke's noblest passages, but even ultimately

to introduce them into a full acquaintance with his entire products.

Let it be distinctly understood, the selection now published, is not a

second-hand one, grafted on some pre-existing volume; but the result

of a diligent, careful, and analytical perusal of Burke's writings. In

attempting such a work, there was one difficulty, which none but those

who have intimately studied this great orator can appreciate,--we allude

to the giving general titles, or descriptive headings, to passages

selected for quotation. There is a mental fulness, a moral variety, and

such a rapid transition of idea, in most of Burke's speeches, that it

almost baffles ability to abbreviate the spirit of his paragraphs, so

as to exhibit under some general head the bearing of the whole. The

selector, in this respect, can only say, he has done his best; and those

who are most competent to appreciate difficulty, will be least inclined

to criticise failure.

Finally, as to the leading design of this volume, its title, "First

Principles," is sufficiently descriptive to save much explanation. Burke

represents an unrivalled combination of patriot, senator, and orator;

and as such, the moral and intellectual nature of the Age will be

purified and expanded, when brought into contact with the attributes of

his character, and the productions of his mind. Nor can the meditative

statesman, whose party is his country, and whose political creed is

based upon a true philosophy of human nature, forget,--that while the

French revolution, as involving FACTS, belongs to History, as

enclosing PRINCIPLES, it appertains to Humanity: and hence, the abiding

application of Burke's profound views, not only to France and England,

but to the world. Of course, those who reverence the majesty of

eloquence, and are fascinated by a florid richness of style, boundless

imagination, inexhaustible metaphor, and all the attending graces of

consummate rhetoric, will also be charmed by the appropriate supply

these pages afford. But, without seeking to be homiletical, let the

writer be permitted to add, a far higher purpose than mere literary

amusement, or the gratification of taste, is designed by the present

volume. It is the selector's most earnest hope, that the "First

Principles" these pages so eloquently inculcate, may be transcribed in

all their purity, loftiness, and truth, into the Reason and Conscience

of his countrymen. And among these, for whose especial guidance he

ventures to think the profound wisdom of these pages to be invaluable,

are the rising statesmen and senators of the day, who are either being

trained in our Public Schools, at the Universities, or about to enter

upon the difficult but inspiring arena of the House of Commons. In

reference to this sphere of legislative action, with all reverence to

its claims and character, let it be said,--material ends (a boundless

passion for physical good, whether indulged in by a nation, or professed

by an individual, is rebuked with solemn wisdom in the following passage

from Aristotle:--"The external advantages of power and fortune are

acquired and maintained by virtue, but virtue is not acquired and

maintained by them; and whether we consider the virtuous energies

themselves, or the fruits which they unceasingly produce, THE SOVEREIGN

GOOD OF LIFE MUST EVIDENTLY BE FOUND IN MORAL AND INTELLECTUAL

EXCELLENCE, MODERATELY SUPPLIED WITH EXTERNAL ACCOMMODATIONS, RATHER

THAN IN THE GREATEST ACCUMULATION OF EXTERNAL ADVANTAGES, UNIMPROVED

AND UNADORNED BY VIRTUE. External prosperity is, indeed, instrumental in

producing happiness, and, therefore, like every other instrument, must

have its assigned limits, beyond which it is inconvenient or hurtful.

But to mental excellence no limit can be assigned; the further it

extends the more USEFUL it becomes, if the epithet of 'USEFUL' need ever

be added to that of HONOURABLE. Besides this, the relative importance

of qualities is best estimated by that of their respective subjects. But

the mind, both in itself and in reference to man, is far better than the

body, or than property. The excellencies of the mind, therefore, are

in the same proportion to be preferred to the highest perfection of the

body, and the best disposition of external circumstances. The two last

are of a far inferior, and merely subservient nature; since no man of

sense covets or pursues them, but for the sake of the mind, with a view

to promote its genuine improvement and augment its native joys. Let this

great truth then be acknowledged,--A TRUTH EVINCED BY THE DEITY HIMSELF,

WHO IS HAPPY, NOT FROM ANY EXTERNAL CAUSE, BUT THROUGH THE INHERENT

ATTRIBUTES OF HIS DIVINE NATURE."--"Politics," lib. iv.), commercial

objects, and secular aggrandizement, are now receiving an idolatrous

homage and passionate regard, which no Christian patriot can contemplate

without anxiety. The ideal, the imaginative, and the religious element,

is almost sneered out of the House of Commons at the existing moment;

and any glowing exhibition of oratory, or splendid manifestation of

intellect, is derided, as being "unpractical" and ill-adapted to the

sobriety of the English Senate! Against this heartless materialism and

unholy mammon-worship, Burke's pages are a magnificent protest; and are

admirably suited to protect the political youth and dawning statesmen

of our country, from the blight and the blast of doctrines which decry

Enthusiasm as folly, and condemn the Beautiful as worthless and untrue.

Ships, colonies, and commerce; exports and imports; taxes and imposts;

charters and civic arrangements,--none but a madman will depreciate

what such themes involve, of duty, energy, and zeal, in political life.

Still, let it be fearlessly maintained, neither wealth, nor commerce, IN

THEMSELVES, can constitute the real greatness of an empire; it is

only because they stand in relation to the higher destinies and holier

responsibilities of an Empire, that a true statesman will regard them as

vitally wound up with the vigour and prosperity of national development.

Such, at least, is the philosophy of Politics, breathed from the undying

pages of Edmund Burke. He who studies this great writer, will, more

and more, sympathise with what Hooker taught, and Bishop Sanderson

inculcates. In one word, he will learn to venerate with increasing

reverence THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION, as

"That peerless growth of patriotic mind,

The great eternal Wonder of mankind!"

Burke traced the ultimate origin of civil government to the Divine

Will, both as declared in Revelation, and imaged forth by the moral

Constitution of man. In this respect, it is well-known how fundamentally

he differs from the theories of Hobbes, Mandeville, Shaftesbury, and

Hutcheson. Not less also, is he opposed to Locke, who tells us,--"The

original compact which begins and ACTUALLY CONSTITUTES ANY POLITICAL

SOCIETY, IS NOTHING BUT THE CONSENT OF ANY NUMBER OF FREEMEN CAPABLE OF

A MAJORITY, TO UNITE AND INCORPORATE INTO SUCH A SOCIETY. AND THIS IS

THAT, AND THAT ONLY, WHICH COULD GIVE BEGINNING TO ANY LAWFUL GOVERNMENT

IN THE WORLD." In one word, Locke declares that civil government is not

from God in the way of principle, but from man in the way of fact; and

thus, being a mere contingency, or moral accident in the history of

human development, self-government is the essential prerogative of our

nature. In accordance with this irrational and unscriptural hypothesis,

we find Price and Priestly expanding Locke's views at the period of

Burke; while in the writings of that apostle of political Antinomianism,

Rousseau, and his English counterpart Tom Paine,--the principles of the

ASSUMED "CONTRAT SOCIAL" display their utmost virulence. This is not

the place to discuss the origin of Civil Government; but the classical

reader, who has been taught to revere the political wisdom of those

ancient Teachers, whose insight was almost prophetical in abstract

science, will thank us for an extract from Aristotle's "Politics," which

bears upon this subject. It presents a most striking coincidence of

sentiment between two master-spirits on the philosophy of government;

and will at once remind the reader of Burke's memorable passage,

beginning with, "Society is a partnership," etc. etc. The passage to

which we allude in Aristotle's "Politics," begins thus: "Ote men oun e

polis phusei proteron e ekastos," k.t.l. The whole passage may be thus

freely translated. "A participation in rights and advantages forms the

bond of political society; AN INSTITUTION PRIOR, IN THE INTENTION OF

NATURE, TO THE FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS FROM WHOM IT IS CONSTITUTED.

What members are to the body, that citizens are to a commonwealth.

The hands or foot, when separated from the body, retains its name, but

totally changes its nature, because it is completely divested of its

uses and powers. In the same manner a citizen is a constituent part of

a whole system, which invests him with powers and qualifies him for

functions for which, in his individual capacity, he is totally unfit;

and independently of such system, he might subsist indeed as a lonely

savage, but could never attain that improved and happy state to which

his progressive nature invariably tends. Perfected by the offices and

duties of social life, man is the best; but, rude and undisciplined, he

is the very worst, of animals. For nothing is more detestable than armed

improbity; and man is armed with craft and courage, which, uncontrolled

by justice, he will most wickedly pervert, and become at once the most

impious and fiercest of monsters, the most abominable in gluttony,

and shameless in personality. But justice is the fundamental virtue

of political society, since the order of Society cannot be maintained

without law, and laws are constituted to proclaim what is just." Let us

add to this noble passage, Aristotle remarks in his "Ethics" (lib. x. c.

8), that a higher destination than political virtue is the true end

of man. In this respect, he concurs with Plato; who teaches us in his

"Theaetetus," the main object of human pursuit ought to be "omoiosis to

theo kata to dunaton," etc. etc.; i.e. "A similitude unto God as far

as possible; which similitude consists in an imitation of His justice,

holiness, and wisdom." To conclude: the noblest end of all Policy on

earth, is to educate Human Nature for that august "politeuma" (Phil.

iii. v. 20), that Eternal Commonwealth which awaits perfected Spirits

above, when, through infinite grace, they are finally admitted into a

"CITY which hath foundations, whose builder and maker is God." (Heb.

xi. 10.) (The dim approximations of Platonic philosophy to certain

discoveries in Divine Revelation, have rightly challenged the attention

of theological enquirers. The above quotation from St. Paul suggests

a reference to one of these, which occurs towards the termination of

Plato's ninth book of "The Republic." He is uttering a protest against

our concluding, that because degeneracy appears to be the invariable law

or destiny of all human commonwealths, THEREFORE, no Archetypal Model

exists of any perfect state, or polity: and then, in opposition to this

political scepticism, Plato adds these remarkable words:--"en

ourano isos paradeigma anakeitai to boulomeno oran kai oronti eauton

katoikizein," etc. etc.--"The state we have here established, which

exists only in our reasoning, but it seems to me, HAS NO EXISTENCE ON

EARTH. BUT IN HEAVEN, PROBABLY, I REPLIED, THERE IS A MODEL OF IT FOR

ANY ONE INCLINED TO CONTEMPLATE THE SAME, AND BY SO CONTEMPLATING IT, TO

REGULATE HIMSELF ACCORDINGLY.")

Selections from the Speeches and Writings of Edmund Burke · 第 7 / 361 题