From H. OSMAN NEWLAND

(Author of "_A Short History of Citizenship_")

The failures of democratic governments in the past have been

attributable, in part, to the lack of intelligence and

self-consciousness among the mass of those who were given a voice in the

government of their country. Citizenship, like morality, was allowed to

grow by instinct; it was never systematised as a science, or applied as

an art. Sparta and Athens approached towards a system of civics much

less elaborate than that expounded by Professor Geddes; but in Sparta

citizenship became inseparable from Nationalism, and in Athens it

scarcely rose above Municipalism. In more modern times, civic education

has had to encounter the same difficulty as in America, where the young

citizen's first duty is to salute his flag, and as in London, where

"Civics" is distributed in doles of local [Page: 134] history in which

the municipality plays a part altogether out of proportion to its

relation to the country, the age, and the world. Civics, as the applied

sociology of each individual and each body of interests, has but begun

to be dreamed of; and before it can be properly developed it is

desirable, if not necessary, that the general public should know

something more than at present both of the historic development of the

"civic" idea, and of the psychology of aggregations as differentiated

from the psychology of the individual. Not until we can make "the man in

the street" a conscious citizen, instead of a political automaton, shall

we be able to enlist his sympathies with "Civics"; and without those

sympathies the sociologist's "Civics" will, I fear, be but partial and

inaccurate.

Civics: as Applied Sociology · 第 10 / 51 题