CHAPTER IV.

CARDINAL BEAUFORT’S TOWER--ST.

CROSS--WINCHESTER--SURREY--SALISBURY--CANTERBURY--ROCHESTER--RYE--EAST

GRINSTEAD--MIDDLESEX.

Cardinal Beaufort’s Tower was built in the early part of the fifteenth

century, when he revived the foundation of St. Cross. To the left of the

illustration is the brewery, formerly called the Hundred Men’s Hall,

because a hundred of the poorest inhabitants of Winchester were daily

entertained to dinner here, and, as that repast was provided on a very

bountiful scale, the guests were always permitted to carry provisions to

their families. This tower and the buildings around it are noble

examples of the domestic architecture of the fifteenth century. The

dwellings of the brethren consist of a parlour, bedroom, scullery, and

closet; they are beautiful examples of old cottage architecture, and are

compactly planned. In this hospital the custom yet prevails of giving

any wayfarer who may ask it a horn of ale and a dole of bread. The ale

is brewed on the premises, and is said to be the same kind as that which

was brewed here hundreds of years ago. The revenues of this building

were till lately enormous, and much dissatisfaction is openly expressed

at the way in which one high in office, recently appropriated the

greater part of them. Nothing can exceed the beauty of St. Cross as it

is approached from the Southampton road. This noble gateway is seen

through great elms and walnut trees, and the long lines of quaint high

chimneys, combining with the church and foliage, are astonishingly

picturesque. The river Itchen sometimes is well in view along the road,

and sometimes it is lost in the trees. The hospital itself, with the

brethren in their black gowns and silver crosses, gives, perhaps, a more

vivid picture of ancient England, and that in its best features, than

any other scene that is left us.

[Illustration: WINCHESTER GATE.]

Just a mile from this charming spot is the West Gate of Winchester.

Formerly there were four gates, but three have been demolished. The one

here shown is said (probably with accuracy) to have been built by King

John. It is unnecessary, however, to remark that later architecture has

been introduced. There is a strong room on the ground-floor, called a

cage, that was for the temporary confinement of disorderly persons, and

till lately it was used for a similar purpose.

The beautiful “Cross” at Winchester is supposed by Britton to have been

erected by Cardinal Beaufort. The cardinal is said to have spent much of

his ill-gotten wealth in splendid architectural works. His wealth was

prodigious, even for a high prelate of those days. In the fine scene

which closes his career in “Henry VI.,” he says in his last moments--

“If thou be’st death, I’ll give thee England’s treasure,

Enough to purchase such another island,

So thou wilt let me live and feel no pain.”

The probability is that the great dramatist more nearly hit off the

truth of the last hours and crimes of the great churchman than ordinary

history has done.

The Cathedral Close at Winchester is extremely picturesque, and the

little houses round it are of considerable antiquity. If the visitor

enters the church from the west end, the scene is of almost unequalled

grandeur. He looks through one continuous vista of pillars, arches, and

roof, extending

[Illustration: STREET IN CLOSE, WINCHESTER.]

to the eastern extremity, where the eye finally rests on the great

eastern window, that seems to dimly light up the choir. The size of this

magnificent vista may best be understood if we consider that a journey

from the west door to the east window and back is only some eighty yards

short of a quarter of a mile. It is curious that Winchester is really

cased in and hidden by a more recent style, in order to adapt it to the

more modern styles of thought and practice; and I am indebted to Mr.

Barry for bringing forward the following problem:--How is it that in the

Georgian era the great rage was for pulling down dwelling-houses, and,

indeed, unhappily, other buildings of a secular character, cathedrals

and parish churches were spared, especially as they were all generally

classified under the term of Gothic, or barbarous? Gothic, it must

always be remembered, is the term of reproach that Wren applied to all

mediæval architecture, though it has now been converted into a word of

praise. Vandalism was the parallel term in those days, and Goths and

Vandals were always brought forward when any signal piece of

art-spoliation had to be described:--

“The Goths and Vandals of our Isle,

Sworn foes to sense and law,

Have burnt to dust a nobler pile

Than Roman ever saw.”

These are the crowd that Cowper alludes to when describing the burning

of Lord Mansfield’s library. The second term only now is ever used in

reproach, the first being almost, as before remarked, a complimentary

epithet. Happily it is so, or else the cathedrals would have fallen in

the fashion of the period that made each new era in design paramount for

the time. Nothing can have been less conservative than the way in which

the monks of old regarded the works of their predecessors. In any

English cathedral we see the masonry of different eras, each with its

own peculiarity, and there was not the slightest hesitation in pulling

down the works of the previous century in order to replace them with

those in fashion; indeed we often find exquisite carved work broken in

pieces and used for rubble, when its very condition shows that the

builders who so used it could have easily restored it--not “restored” in

the modern sense of the word, but repaired it. To be so conservative as

we are now of the works of our ancestors in an age that is pre-eminently

one of progress, seems an anachronism, but it must be remembered that we

should not now have possessed much in the way of cathedrals if it were

not for the fact that after the Reformation, clergy fell almost into

contempt for a long time. Macaulay’s _History of England_ tells us how

lightly they were esteemed; a chaplain to a family of rank and wealth

was hardly held in greater honour than the head gamekeeper or huntsman;

and the wealth of the bishops and dignitaries seems almost to have

isolated rather than enabled them to mingle with their equals.

Ecclesiastical buildings were therefore neglected, happily for the

present generation, or else we should have had a dozen grand old Gothic

piles replaced by the architecture of Queen Anne or the Georges. The

tide of improvement that swept away so many old English mansions passed

by them.

Surrey is a very beautiful county, undulating and diversified. A great

part of it is not more than 300 feet above the level of the sea, and

Leith Hill, near Dorking, which is the highest part of it, is only about

900 feet in elevation. There are many old towns and villages in Surrey,

and not a few are of great historical interest. Esher is the place where

Cardinal Wolsey was ordered to retire to after his downfall. The gateway

still remains of Esher Palace. It is a fine old tower, with turrets at

the angles. Norfolk gives the--to him--congenial orders:--

“Hear the King’s pleasure, Cardinal; who commands you

To render up the great seal presently

Into our hands; and to confine yourself

To Esher-house--my lord of Winchester’s.”

The Town-hall of Guildford is a very characteristic building of the

earliest period of classic revival. I saw a painting of it that dated

back to the earlier part of last century, and the street seems hardly to

have been altered since this picture was executed. The balcony is of

course for addressing an audience at election times, and the clock

stands quaintly out into the street, supported by thin ribbons of

wrought

[Illustration: GUILDFORD, SURREY.]

iron. Much of the character of this and other classic buildings of the

period when the revival took place, came from Holland, and the stiff

gardening was introduced from the Netherlands, though of course the

Dutch element is more observable in places like Hull, that had more

direct communication with the Low Countries. The revivals of Wren and

Inigo Jones proceed from an entirely different quarter, though of course

they often combined with them.

[Illustration: SALISBURY: CATHEDRAL CLOSE.]

The city of Salisbury, it has been well said by one of our best

antiquarians, has its origin well defined, and in this respect differs

from English cities generally. It has nothing Roman, Saxon, or

[Illustration: SALISBURY OLD GATEWAY, HIGH STREET.]

even Norman in its origin, but is purely an English city, and it may be

considered as unique. It has abundant provision for cleanliness, and is

even without the remains of a baronial fortress. True it is that it was

surrounded by walls, and a very fine gateway is shown here, but these

walls were the boundaries of the precincts of the ecclesiastics. The

[Illustration: SALISBURY.]

[Illustration: OLD HOUSES, SALISBURY.]

See of Salisbury was removed from Old Sarum in 1215 to its present site,

in consequence of the “brawles and sadde blows,” as Holinshed states,

between the clergy and the castellans, and then the splendid cathedral

was commenced. King Henry III. granted the church a weekly market, and a

fair of eight days’ continuance; and, according to Dodsworth’s

_Salisbury_, “the city was divided into spaces of seven perches each in

length, and three in breadth,” and this accounts for the present

symmetrical arrangement of the streets.

The view in the High Street, looking into the close, shows one of the

entrance gatehouses. It is, of course, of later date than the Cathedral,

but extremely fine, and characteristic of ancient English architecture.

The view of Salisbury from the bridge includes the present

workhouse--the building on the right. There is a fine old chapel here,

and a curiously ornamented chimney-piece, and also an apartment Britton

calls a “monks’ parlor.”

[Illustration: SALISBURY, FROM BRIDGE.]

[Illustration: SALISBURY MARKET.]

Of Salisbury market little need be said. The engraver has reproduced the

scene excellently well, and it will at all times be numbered among the

most graceful stone structures, either ancient or modern, that adorn the

kingdom.

Surrey, from its position, has often occupied a conspicuous place in

English history, and it is hardly necessary to add that Runnymede, near

Egham, where the great and peaceful revolution took place that is felt

to the present day, is in Surrey.

Canterbury is one of the most delightful cities in England for an

antiquary. Not much remains of its military antiquities, but the

ecclesiastical and domestic relics are numerous and imposing. St.

Augustine’s monastery is worth a pilgrimage from any part of England,

and notwithstanding all it has suffered from having been used as a

brewery, it bears many grand traces of its ancient splendour.

Mercery Lane, which is here shown, is one of the ancient narrow streets

of the city, and the engraver has given an excellent idea of its present

appearance. The houses on each side are two storeys higher, and that

would still further seem to contract its width; but the Cathedral, and

the Christ Church gateway that shuts off the Cathedral precincts, and

appears to span the street, are very well given.

This is the principal gateway to the close, and was built by Prior

Goldstone in 1517. The octagonal sides were formerly surmounted by

elegant turrets, but these have been taken down as low as the

battlements. The arms of Becket are carved on one of the spandrels, and

there is an inscription:--“HOC OPUS CONSTRUCTUM EST ANNO DOMINI

MILESSIMO QUINGENTESSIMO DECIMO SEPTIMO.” The effect of the great

cathedral towers in warm gray, and the

[Illustration: CANTERBURY.]

precinct archway seen through a long vista of dark street, is peculiarly

grand.

There are not a few black-and-white gabled houses still standing in

Canterbury, and now all antiquities are preserved with jealous care. The

small houses shown at end of this chapter are characteristic of the

humbler dwellings of the city, and show how low a room was sometimes

considered to be sufficient. According to Geoffrey of Monmouth a British

town stood here as far back as nine centuries before the Christian era;

but the Romans early established a colony here, and changed the old

British name to Durovernum. A view of a Roman gateway is still given in

Gostling’s _Walks_, and another Roman gateway was taken down in 1790.

Falstaff Inn is an ancient hostelry of very considerable merit as to its

present accommodation. The signboard projects to an extraordinary extent

into the road, and is supported by elaborate wrought iron work.

The west gate, which is shown in the same engraving, is the only one of

the six ancient barriers of Canterbury. Britton tells us that it was

built by Archbishop Sudbury, who proposed to erect strong defences at

each entrance to the city, and connect

[Illustration: FALSTAFF HOTEL, CANTERBURY.]

them all by walls, which should completely surround it. “The barbarous

murder of that active and benevolent prelate by the insurgents under Wat

Tyler on Tower Hill, June 14, 1381, put an end to this among many other

appropriate and useful improvements planned for the advantage of his

metropolitan city. The gatehouse he, however, completed, and it is an

interesting feature among the numerous antiquities of the place. It

crosses the high road from London to Dover, and serves as a protection

to the bridge over the western branch of the Stour, which at this place

is only a small stream. It is embattled and machicolated, and the

grooves still remain which directed the fall of the portcullis. The arch

is of subsequent date, and forms part of the reparations effected by

Archbishop Juxon after the disturbance occasioned by the puritanical

Mayor at Christmas 1647. The centre is flanked by the very lofty and

spacious round towers, the foundations of which are laid in the river

Stour. They are divided into two storeys, and are pierced with loopholes

having circular endings, similar to those observable in the remains of

the fortifications near Dane-John-Hill, and are embattled.” This

gatehouse, when Britton wrote his description, was used as the city

prison both for criminals and debtors.

Canterbury is always associated with Chaucer’s wonderful work, the

_Canterbury Tales_, and the accurate insight that this gives into the

manners and customs of the time. The Tabard, afterwards the Talbot in

Southwark, retained till comparatively recent times many of the features

of the hostelry that it had when Chaucer described it. The landlord was

a man of great mark, and his social importance is rather startling to

our present ideas. His guests were composed of all ranks of people, and

after their dinner was over he proposed a journey to Canterbury at his

own cost and charges, and that he should judge the best story that any

of them could narrate on the road, being “wise and well ytaught”

himself. Chaucer’s characters of the guests are wonderfully clever and

lifelike, even at the present day; but it is rather curious to find him

so outspoken against the monk and friar, and contrasting them with the

“poure parson of a town,” and “the clerk of Oxenford.” The former seems

to have suggested Goldsmith’s village parson, and indeed it is

impossible to read Chaucer’s description without being reminded of

almost parallel passages, though Goldsmith’s are of course so much

sweeter.

“Fenced around with barbican and bastion on the one hand, and girded by

high walls towards the river, the legal and baronial occupiers of

Rochester Castle sat in safety,” says the historian, “whether dispensing

the rude justice to trembling serfs, or quaffing the red wine among

their knightly retainers.” The last repairs the castle received were at

the hands of the possessor in Edward VI.’s time. James I. granted it to

Sir Anthony Welldone, and his descendant Walker Welldone, according to

Grose, “sold the timbers of it to one Gimmit, and the stone stairs, and

other squared and wrought stone of the windows and arches, to different

masons in London; he would likewise have sold the whole materials of the

castle to a paviour, but on an essay made on the east side, near the

postern leading to Bully Hill, the effects of which are seen in a large

chasm, the mortar was found so hard that the expense of separating these

stones amounted to more than their value, by which this noble pile

escaped a total demolition.” The streets of Rochester, though they

contain many beautiful houses of ancient date, can boast of little, if

anything at all, equal to the castle in antiquity. There is one very

fine gabled residence, now used as a school, on the south side of the

city. The gateway called the College Gate is here shown. It is built of

oak, with clinker boarding, and is extremely picturesque. The street in

which it stands leads up to the cathedral precincts. The ancient house

architecture of Kent is very valuable for examples. In the neighbourhood

of Broadstairs the chimneys, both of brick and stone, afford a great

store of quaint examples for this little understood branch of building.

And all antiquarians are indebted to Kent as being the home of Camden,

the greatest of antiquaries, who died at Camden Place in 1623, at the

residence where the Emperor Napoleon III. expired exactly 250 years

later.

[Illustration: ROCHESTER.]

Two illustrations only are given in Sussex, though it has many quaint

old street scenes. Chichester is rather disappointing to those who see

it for the first time, and know it by its old cross and cathedral. There

still remain in the upper part of South Street some houses with

overhanging cornices, that are attributed, and in all probability

accurately so, to Sir Christopher Wren. The Cross has often been

described and drawn, and is a thoroughly good example of street

architecture. It is quite impossible to do more than hurry over this

county. Winchelsea was added to the Cinque Ports before the reign of

King John, and in the reign of Henry VI. it was the principal port of

embarkation for the continent. The Land Gate, the Strand Gate, and the

New Gate, three out of its old gateways, are still standing, though they

are rather ruinous, and Winchelsea itself is in a state of decay, hardly

being more now than a village.

Rye is about two miles to the north-east of Winchelsea, and is a very

ancient town with grass-grown streets. They are nearly all narrow,

steep, and very winding. Rye is one of the Cinque Ports, like

Winchelsea, and as yet its harbour continues to be of some little

consequence. The church clock, which is still in use, is said to be the

most ancient in England. The gabled houses here shown are very

characteristic of the town, and much resemble those in Chester and

Shrewsbury.

[Illustration: OLD HOUSES, RYE.]

It has been said that it is difficult to decide if this rather familiar

style of building which still adorns so many of our older county towns

is an adaptation of a still older form. “Owing to constant improvement,”

says an author of a paper read before the Liverpool Architectural

Society, “it is impossible to determine exactly the various periods,

because old timbers and productions in wood were used in the

construction of new houses. For the same reason it is difficult to say

whether examples were new in design or copies from earlier buildings.

Such an instance we have in the ceiling of Neworth Castle, which is

richly carved, and bears the character of the fourteenth century,

although the structure was rebuilt almost entirely towards the close of

Queen Elizabeth’s reign.” We have already remarked on the former part of

this sentence, as illustrated in so many street fronts in Chester, and

for the second part, there is no doubt that the ordinary street

architecture of Queen Elizabeth’s time, where it had none of the

peculiarities introduced by Thorpe into the country, was similar to that

which existed for centuries before. It is quite possible that the house

in Shrewsbury where Richmond lodged before the battle of Bosworth[2] was

of some age then--indeed, there are reasons for supposing so; yet there

is no characteristic in it that would distinguish it from a town house

of Charles II.’s time, unless, of course, the latter had some

enrichment. East Grinstead is seated on a hill near the borders of

Sussex. It contains many very interesting half-timbered houses, not

dissimilar in character to the illustrations from Rye. The one we have

shown is a characteristic stone house, with a fine massive chimney and

mullioned windows.

[Illustration: EAST GRINSTEAD.]

If some sort of a consecutive order is to be kept in the counties,

Middlesex would almost seem to follow Kent and Surrey, and London is yet

full of quaint old relics like Staples Inn, Lincoln’s Inn, Crosby Hall,

the interesting streets at the north side of St. Paul’s. There is also

much curious architecture in the buildings of the twelve great guilds,

and in the squares and streets round Russell Square are many fine old

remains of Queen Anne’s time. Many of these are turned into

lodging-houses, or let off in flats to professional men; but one thing

is certain, there is a wealth of old city architecture inside London

houses that would surprise many an old inhabitant.

This is more valuable now since the revival, by Mr. Norman Shaw, of the

Queen Anne architecture; not that it necessarily should supersede all

other styles, or any other, but there are places where it might have its

use, and form a valuable addition to the picturesque appearance of the

landscape. But in coming to London after the streets and homesteads we

have been considering, one feels almost like a country cousin that has

arrived from the shires. Anything that can be said is so well known

already by nearly all the residents. Every spot round London is classic

ground. Hampstead, where the meetings of the famous Kit Kat Club

[Illustration: PINNER.]

were held, and where Addison and Steele used often to be found, is only

just outside the metropolis on the north-west; Edmonton, on the

north-east, where the Bell Inn is standing, that is immortalised by

Cowper in “John Gilpin”; Finchley, familiar to every one through

Hogarth’s “March of the Guards” in 1745, on their way to suppress the

Pretender; and hundreds of other similar spots, would form not only an

interesting but a large work of themselves. Excepting the brickwork,

however, at Lincoln’s Inn[3] and “Pinner on the hill,” no illustrations

of Middlesex have been attempted.

[Illustration: STREET IN CANTERBURY.]

[Illustration: ANCIENT HOUSE NEAR ST. ALBANS.]

Ancient Streets and Homesteads of England · 第 4 / 9 章