CHAPTER XI

HORSES, MULES, BURROS

[Sidenote: Mules]

A GOOD riding mule, when you can get him, and provided you intend to use

him only for trail travel in the mountains, is about the best

proposition. A mule is more sure-footed than a horse, and can subsist

where a horse would starve. On the other hand he is not much good off a

walk; never acquires the horse's interest in getting around stubborn

stock, and is apt to be mean. None of these objections, however much

they may influence your decision as to saddle animals, will have any

weight against a pack beast. For the latter purpose the mule is

unexcelled. But probably in the long run you will prefer to ride a

horse.

[Sidenote: Burros]

Burros are an aggravation; and yet in some circumstances they are hard

to beat. They are unbelievably slow, and unbelievably stubborn. When

they get tired--or think they do--they stop, and urging merely confirms

their decision to rest. You cannot hurry them. They hate water, and it

is sometimes next to impossible to force them into a deep or swift

stream. They are camp thieves, and will eat anything left within their

reach. Still, they can live on sage-bush, go incredible periods without

drinking, make their way through country impassible to any other hoofed

animals excepting goats and sheep. Certain kinds of desert travel is

impossible without them, and some sorts of high rough mountaineering is

practicable only with their aid. At times you will be driven to the use

of them. In such an emergency gird your soul with patience, and try to

buy big ones.

[Sidenote: Pack Mules]

Pack mules are almost impossible to get, and are generally very high

priced. A good pack mule does not mean any old mule that comes along.

The animal should be rather small, chunkily built, gentle as to the

heels and teeth, accustomed to carrying and taking care of a pack,

trained to follow the saddle horses, and not inclined to stray from

camp. Such perfection costs anywhere from seventy-five to one hundred

and fifty dollars. It is worth the price to one who does much packing;

but as perfectly adequate pack horses can be had for from twenty to

forty dollars, and are easy to find, you will in all likelihood choose

them.

[Sidenote: Choosing a Horse]

Now I know perfectly well that I can tell you nothing about choosing a

horse. If you are a New Englander you will know all about the trade; if

you are a New Yorker, you could give me points on every horse in the

ring; if you are Middle West, you probably have read or worked or traded

or raised more horses than I will ever ride. But in selecting a mountain

horse, his mere points as a physical specimen are often little in his

favor, while glaring defects may concern his usefulness hardly at all.

[Sidenote: Western Horses]

Never mind at first how the horse offered for your inspection looks.

Examine him for blemishes later. You must first discover if he is

sure-footed and courageous. An eastern horse would not last five minutes

on a western trail. A western horse, no matter how accustomed to

mountain work, is worse than useless if subject to ordinary horse-panics

at suddenly rustling leaves, unexpected black stubs, and the like. He

must attend to his footing, keep his eyes for the trail, and _be wise_.

Next you must inquire if this steadiness carries over into other things.

He must stand when left without hitching, and must be easy to catch.

Often you will have to dismount for the purpose of clearing trail,

helping the pack train, tightening ropes, or reconnoitering. At such

junctures iron hitching posts are not always at hand. Nothing is more

aggravating than the necessity of searching everywhere for a place to

tie, or worse, to be forced to chase down and coax quiet a horse that

has promptly decamped when left for a moment to himself. Nor does it add

to your joy to get up at four for the purpose of making an early start,

only to spend the extra hour filched from sleep in an attempt to catch

some snorting fool horse.

The picture I have sketched looks to you somewhat like what is known as

an "old cow," doesn't it? But in reality good horses of the quality

named are not difficult to find. Equine intelligence is of a higher

grade West than East, mainly because a western horse is all his life

thrown on his own resources. It is perfectly possible to find a horse

both handsome and spirited, which will nevertheless permit himself to be

directly approached in pasture, and will stand until further orders on

the trail.

[Sidenote: An "Old Cow" of a Horse]

But the point is that it is much better, oh, infinitely! to get an "old

cow" than a horse without these qualities. The "old cow" will carry you,

and will be there when wanted. That is the main thing in the mountains.

While as for the other horse, no matter how well bred he is, how

spirited, how well gaited, how handsome, how appealing in every way to a

horseman's eye--he will be worse than no horse if you have to keep your

hands on him, if he must be picketed at night, if he is likely to shy on

a bad trail, if he may refuse to tackle a rough place or to swim a

river.

[Illustration: In mid-day the shade of the pines is inviting]

[Sidenote: A Handsome Horse Not Necessary]

Of course it is nice to ride a good-looking horse; but in the mountains

most emphatically "handsome is what handsome does." The horses I now own

are fine animals and fine mountain ponies; but some of the best I have

ever ridden, a horseman would not look at twice. On a time, being under

the absolute necessity of getting a pack quickly, I purchased a bay that

I promptly named Methuselah. He was some sixteen years old, badly stove

forward by hard riding, and not much of a horse anyway. For three months

he carried a pack. Then one day I threw a saddle on him to go a short

distance on some little errand. Methuselah, overjoyed, did his best. The

old horse was one of the best mountain saddlers in the outfit. He

climbed surely and well; he used his head in negotiating bad places;

would stay where he was put. The fact that he was not sound was

utterly unimportant, for not once in a week was he required to go faster

than a walk.

On the other hand I once owned a Bill-horse, mountain-bred and raised.

He was a beautiful beast, proud, high-stepping--one you would be glad to

be seen on. He would have been worth considerable money, and would have

afforded much solid satisfaction if I had wanted him for cow work, or

pleasure riding in the lower country. But it was absolutely impossible

to catch him, even hobbled, without a corral. One day I saw him leap

from a stand and with hobbles over a fence and feed trough. So I traded

him for another, not near so much of a horse, as a horse, but worth two

dozen Bill-horses.

[Sidenote: Gun Shyness]

[Sidenote: What One "Sam Fat" Did]

One other thing you must notice, and that is whether or not the beast is

gun shy. A great many stampede wildly at the report of firearms. I once

owned a pack horse named Sam Fat, on which for some time I

congratulated myself. He was a heavy animal, and could carry a

tremendous load; and yet he was sure-footed and handled himself well on

rough country. He was gentle and friendly. He took excellent care of his

pack, and he followed perfectly. No one needed to ride behind him to

keep Sam Fat coming. I used to turn him loose when I started, and pay no

more attention to him until I stopped. No matter how rich the feed

through which we passed, Sam Fat was always on hand when the halt was

called. And, very important point, he was a good rustler--he kept fat

and sleek on poor food where other horses gaunted. Altogether Sam Fat

was a find. Then one day one of the party shot off a harmless little

twenty-two caliber popgun. Sam Fat went crazy. He squatted flat, uttered

a terrified squeal, and departed through the woods, banging his pack

against trees and hanging limbs. We chased him a mile, and finally

brought him back, but all the rest of the day he was panicky. I tried to

get him accustomed to shooting by tying him near our target practice,

but it was no use. Finally, though reluctantly, I sold him.

So when the natives bring in their horses for your selection blind your

eyes to the question of looks and points until you have divided the

offering into two parts--those that are sure-footed, courageous, gentle,

tractable, easy to catch, good grub rustlers, and if pack horses, those

that will follow and will take care of their packs, and those that lack

one or more of these qualifications. Discard the second group. Then if

the first group contains nothing but blemished or homely horses, make

the best of it, perfectly sure that the others might as well not exist.

[Sidenote: Qualifications]

In general, a horse just from pasture should have a big belly. A

small-bellied horse will prove to be a poor feeder, and will probably

weaken down on a long hike. The best horse stands from fourteen hands to

fourteen two, and is chunkily built. There are exceptions, both ways, to

this rule. A pack horse is better with low withers on account of the

possibility of sore backs. Avoid a horse whose ears hang sidewise from

his head; he is apt to be stubborn. As for the rest, horse sense is the

same everywhere.

[Sidenote: What a Horse Should Carry]

[Sidenote: Sore Backs]

A pack horse can carry two hundred pounds--not more. Of course more can

be piled on him, and he will stand up under it, but on a long trip he

will deteriorate. Greater weights are carried only in text books, in

camp-fire lies, and where a regular pack route permits of grain feeding.

A good animal, with care, will take two hundred successfully enough, but

I personally always pack much lighter. Feed costs nothing, so it is

every bit as cheap to take three horses as two. The only expense is the

slight bother of packing an extra animal. In return you can travel

farther and more steadily, the chances of sore backs are minimized, your

animals keep fat and strong, and in case one meets with an accident, you

can still save all your effects on the other. For the last three years

I have made it a practice to pack only about a hundred to a hundred and

twenty-five pounds when off for a very long trip. My animals have always

come out fat and hearty, sometimes in marked contrast to those of my

companions, and I have not had a single case of sore back.

The latter are best treated by Bickmore's Gall Cure. Its use does not

interfere in the least with packing; and I have never seen a case it did

not cure inside ten days or two weeks if applied at the beginning of the

trouble.

[Sidenote: How Far a Horse Should Travel]

In the mountains and on grass-feed twenty miles a day is big travel. If

you push more than that you are living beyond your income. It is much

better, if you are moving every day, to confine yourself to jaunts of

from twelve to fifteen miles on an average. Then if necessity arises,

you have something to fall back on, and are able to make a forced march.

[Sidenote: Mountain Travel]

The distance may seem very short to you if you have never traveled in

the mountains; but as a matter of fact you will probably find it quite

sufficient, both in length of time and in variety of scenery. To cover

it you will travel steadily for from six to eight hours; and in the

diversity of country will be interested every step of the way. Indeed so

varied will be the details that it will probably be difficult to believe

you have made so small a mileage, until you stop to reflect that,

climbing and resting, no horse can go faster than two or two and

one-half miles an hour.

[Sidenote: Desert Travel]

On the desert or the plains the length of your journey must depend

entirely on the sort of feed you can get. Thirty miles a day for a long

period is all a fed-horse can do, while twenty is plenty enough for an

animal depending on his own foraging. Longer rides are not to be

considered in the course of regular travel. I once did one hundred and

eighty miles in two days--and then took a rest.

[Sidenote: Time to Travel]

In the mountains you must keep in mind that a horse must both eat and

rest; and that he will not graze when frost is on the meadows. Many

otherwise skillful mountaineers ride until nearly dark, and are up and

off soon after daylight. They wonder why their horses lose flesh and

strength. The truth is the poor beasts must compress their twenty-four

hours of sustenance into the short noon stop, and the shorter evening

before the frost falls. It is often much wiser to get a very early

start, to travel until the middle of the afternoon, and then to go into

camp. Whatever inconvenience and discomfort you may suffer is more than

made up for by the opportunities to hunt, fish, or cook afforded by the

early stop; and the time you imagine you lose is regained in the long

run by the regularity of your days' journeys.

[Sidenote: Desert Journeying]

On the desert or the plains where it is hot, to the contrary, you will

have better luck by traveling early and late. Desert journeying is

uncomfortable anyway, but has its compensations. We ordinarily get under

way by three in the morning; keep going until nine; start about six

again--after supper--and travel until nine of the evening. Thus we take

advantage of whatever coolness is possible, and see the rising and the

falling of the day, which is the most wonderful and beautiful of the

desert's gifts.

[Sidenote: Climbing]

Going up steep hills in high altitudes you must breathe your horse every

fifty feet or so. It need not be a long rest. Merely rein him in for

eight or ten seconds. Do the same thing _always_ before entering the

negotiation of a bad place in the trail. Do this, no matter how fresh

and eager your animal may seem. Often it spells the difference between a

stumble and a good clean climb. An experienced pack horse will take

these rests on his own initiative, stopping and also starting again with

the regularity of clockwork.

It does not hurt a horse to sweat, but if ever he begins to drip

heavily, and to tremble in the legs, it is getting time to hunt the

shade for a rest. I realize that such minor points as these may be

perfectly well known to every one likely to read this book, and yet I

have seen so many cases of ignorance of them on the trail that I risk

their inclusion here.

[Sidenote: Unsaddling]

Every hour or so loosen the cinches of your saddle horse and raise the

saddle and blankets an inch or so to permit a current of air to pass

through. Steaming makes the back tender. When you unsaddle him or the

pack animals, if they are very hot, leave the blankets across them for a

few moments. A hot sun shining on a sweaty back causes small pimples,

which may develop into sores. It is better to bathe with cold water the

backs of green horses; but such a trouble is not necessary after they

are hardened.

[Sidenote: To Pick Up a Horse's Feet]

Two more things I will mention, though strictly speaking, they do not

fall in the province of equipment. When you pick up a horse's hind foot,

face to the rear, put the hand nearest the horse firmly against his

flank, and use the other to raise the hoof. Then if he tries to kick,

you can hold him off sufficiently to get out of the way. Indeed the

very force of his movement toward you will thrust against the hand on

his flank and tend to throw you to one side.

[Sidenote: To Mount a Bad Horse]

If you are called upon to mount a bad horse, seize the check piece of

his bridle in your left hand and twist his head sharply toward you. At

the same time grasp the pommel in your right hand, thrust your foot in

the stirrup and swing aboard. Never get on any western horse as an

easterner mounts--left hand on pommel and right hand on cantle. If a

horse plunges forward to buck while you are in this position, you will

inevitably land back of the saddle. Then he has a fine leverage to throw

you about forty feet. A bad pack horse you can handle by blindfolding.

Anchor things for a storm, take off the bandage, and stand one side.

Camp and Trail · 第 11 / 12 章