I go politically for equality,--I said,--and socially for the quality.

Who are the “quality,”--said the Model, etc., in a community like ours?

I confess I find this question a little difficult to answer,--I said.

--Nothing is better known than the distinction of social ranks which

exists in every community, and nothing is harder to define. The great

gentlemen and ladies of a place are its real lords and masters and

mistresses; they are the quality, whether in a monarchy or a republic;

mayors and governors and generals and senators and ex-presidents are

nothing to them. How well we know this, and how seldom it finds a

distinct expression! Now I tell you truly, I believe in man as man, and

I disbelieve in all distinctions except such as follow the natural lines

of cleavage in a society which has crystallized according to its own

true laws. But the essence of equality is to be able to say the truth;

and there is nothing more curious than these truths relating to the

stratification of society.

Of all the facts in this world that do not take hold of immortality,

there is not one so intensely real, permanent, and engrossing as this of

social position,--as you see by the circumstances that the core of all

the great social orders the world has seen has been, and is still, for

the most part, a privileged class of gentlemen and ladies arranged in a

regular scale of precedence among themselves, but superior as a body to

all else.

Nothing but an ideal Christian equality, which we have been getting

farther away from since the days of the Primitive Church, can

prevent this subdivision of society into classes from taking place

everywhere,--in the great centres of our republic as much as in

old European monarchies. Only there position is more absolutely

hereditary,--here it is more completely elective.

--Where is the election held? and what are the qualifications? and who

are the electors?--said the Model.

Nobody ever sees when the vote is taken; there never is a formal vote.

The women settle it mostly; and they know wonderfully well what is

presentable, and what can't stand the blaze of the chandeliers and the

critical eye and ear of people trained to know a staring shade in a

ribbon, a false light in a jewel, an ill-bred tone, an angular movement,

everything that betrays a coarse fibre and cheap training. As a general

thing, you do not get elegance short of two or three removes from the

soil, out of which our best blood doubtless comes,--quite as good, no

doubt, as if it came from those old prize-fighters with iron pots on

their heads, to whom some great people are so fond of tracing their

descent through a line of small artisans and petty shopkeepers whose

veins have held “base” fluid enough to fill the Cloaca Maxima!

Does not money go everywhere?--said the Model.

Almost. And with good reason. For though there are numerous exceptions,

rich people are, as I said, commonly altogether the most agreeable

companions. The influence of a fine house, graceful furniture, good

libraries, well-ordered tables, trim servants, and, above all, a

position so secure that one becomes unconscious of it, gives a harmony

and refinement to the character and manners which we feel, if we cannot

explain their charm. Yet we can get at the reason of it by thinking a

little.

All these appliances are to shield the sensibility from disagreeable

contacts, and to soothe it by varied natural and artificial influences.

In this way the mind, the taste, the feelings, grow delicate, just as

the hands grow white and soft when saved from toil and incased in soft

gloves. The whole nature becomes subdued into suavity. I confess I like

the quality ladies better than the common kind even of literary ones.

They have n't read the last book, perhaps, but they attend better to you

when you are talking to them. If they are never learned, they make up

for it in tact and elegance. Besides, I think, on the whole, there is

less self-assertion in diamonds than in dogmas. I don't know where

you will find a sweeter portrait of humility than in Esther, the poor

play-girl of King Ahasuerus; yet Esther put on her royal apparel when

she went before her lord. I have no doubt she was a more gracious and

agreeable person than Deborah, who judged the people and wrote the story

of Sisera. The wisest woman you talk with is ignorant of something that

you know, but an elegant woman never forgets her elegance.

Dowdyism is clearly an expression of imperfect vitality. The highest

fashion is intensely alive,--not alive necessarily to the truest

and best things, but with its blood tingling, as it were, in all its

extremities and to the farthest point of its surface, so that the

feather in its bonnet is as fresh as the crest of a fighting-cock,

and the rosette on its slipper as clean-cut and pimpant (pronounce it

English fashion,--it is a good word) as a dahlia. As a general rule,

that society where flattery is acted is much more agreeable than that

where it is spoken. Don't you see why? Attention and deference don't

require you to make fine speeches expressing your sense of unworthiness

(lies) and returning all the compliments paid you. This is one reason.

--A woman of sense ought to be above flattering any man,--said the

Model.

[My reflection. Oh! oh! no wonder you did n't get married. Served you

right.] My remark. Surely, Madam,--if you mean by flattery telling

people boldly to their faces that they are this or that, which they are

not. But a woman who does not carry about with her wherever she goes

a halo of good feeling and desire to make everybody contented,--an

atmosphere of grace, mercy, and peace, of at least six feet radius,

which wraps every human being upon whom she voluntarily bestows her

presence, and so flatters him with the comfortable thought that she

is rather glad he is alive than otherwise, isn't worth the trouble of

talking to, as a woman; she may do well enough to hold discussions with.

--I don't think the Model exactly liked this. She said,--a little

spitefully, I thought,--that a sensible man might stand a little praise,

but would of course soon get sick of it, if he were in the habit of

getting much.

Oh, yes,--I replied,--just as men get sick of tobacco. It is notorious

how apt they are to get tired of that vegetable.

--That 's so!--said the young fellow John,--I've got tired of my cigars

and burnt 'em all up.

I am heartily glad to hear it,--said the Model,--I wish they were all

disposed of in the same way.

So do I,--said the young fellow John.

Can't you get your friends to unite with you in committing those odious

instruments of debauchery to the flames in which you have consumed your

own?

The Professor at the Breakfast-Table · 第 29 / 49 题