Rainfall also is heavy on the high mountain ridges, where te

Produced by Chris Curnow, Joseph Cooper, Josephine Paolucci

and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at

https://www.pgdp.net.

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PUBLICATIONS

MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY

Volume 15, No. 1, pp. 1-148, pls. 1-6, 11 figs.

December 20, 1961

[Transcriber's Note: Words surrounded by cedillas, like ~this~ signifies

words in bold. Words surrounded by underscores, like _this_, signifies

words in italics.]

The Amphibians and Reptiles of Michoacan, Mexico

BY

WILLIAM E. DUELLMAN

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS

LAWRENCE

1961

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PUBLICATIONS, MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY

Editors: E. Raymond Hall, Chairman, Henry S. Fitch,

Theodore H. Eaton, Jr.

Volume 15, No. 1, pp. 1-148, pls. 1-6, 11 figs.

Published December 20, 1961

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS

Lawrence, Kansas

PRINTED IN

THE STATE PRINTING PLANT

TOPEKA, KANSAS

1961

The Amphibians and Reptiles of Michoacan, Mexico

BY

WILLIAM E. DUELLMAN

CONTENTS

PAGE

INTRODUCTION 3

Acknowledgments 5

Historical Account 7

NATURAL LANDSCAPE 9

GEOGRAPHY OF THE HERPETOFAUNA 13

ANNOTATED LIST OF SPECIES 13

Amphibia 14

Caudata 14

Salientia 20

Reptilia 56

Testudines 56

Crocodilia 58

Sauria 59

Serpentes 88

SPECIES OF QUESTIONABLE OCCURRENCE 124

GAZETTEER 129

SUMMARY 141

LITERATURE CITED 142

INTRODUCTION

For almost 30 years North American herpetologists have been making

extensive collections of reptiles and amphibians in Mexico. Some parts

of the country, because of their accessibility, soon became relatively

well known; other regions lying off the beaten path were bypassed or

inadequately sampled. Principally in the last decade herpetologists have

been entering regions from which no collections previously were

available in an attempt to fill gaps in known distributions and to

discover unknown species of animals. In 1950 Dr. Donald D. Brand led an

exploration party from the University of Texas to the poorly explored

and faunistically unknown region of southwestern Michoacan. James A.

Peters accompanied Brand and collected amphibians and reptiles. In 1951

I welcomed the opportunity to accompany Brand on a second expedition to

southwestern Michoacan. Such was the beginning of my interest in the

herpetofauna of the region. I have been fortunate to return to Michoacan

on four successive trips, all of which had as their purpose the

accumulation of data on the herpetofauna that would result in a survey

of the component species and an analysis of their distribution.

My original intention was to amplify Peters' (1954) study based on the

collections made by him in 1950 and by me in 1951 in the Sierra de

Coalcoman. But it soon became evident that in order to understand the

relationships of the herpetofauna of the Sierra de Coalcoman, the

species inhabiting the Tepalcatepec Valley and adjacent mountain ranges

would have to be studied. In the course of making that study I examined

all specimens from Michoacan already in museums.

There have been few detailed herpetofaunal studies in Mexico. The first

such study of any consequence was that by Bogert and Oliver (1945) on

the herpetofauna of Sonora. In that paper the authors analyzed the fauna

from a geographic view and showed the transition from tropical species

in the southern part of the state to members of the Sonoran Desert

assemblage to the north. Martin (1958) made a detailed study of the

herpetofauna of the Gomez Farias region in southern Tamaulipas; he

emphasized the ecological distribution of amphibians and reptiles in

that region with special reference to cloud forests. Duellman (1958c)

presented a preliminary geographic analysis of the herpetofauna of

Colima with special reference to the continuity of the species

inhabiting the lowlands. Zweifel (1960) discussed in detail the

herpetofauna of the Tres Marias Islands and commented on the derivation

of the fauna. Duellman (1960d) provided a detailed account of the

geographic distribution of the amphibians known to occur in the lowlands

of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec and attempted to account for the present

patterns of distribution.

The present report is the first of two parts dealing with the

herpetofauna of Michoacan. The purpose of this part is to present a full

account of the species of amphibians and reptiles known to inhabit the

state of Michoacan; the accounts of the species are accompanied by a

brief description of the natural landscape and of the various

assemblages of species comprising the major faunistic groups within the

region. A gazetteer of collecting localities is appended. The second

part of the study, now in preparation, deals with the ecological and

historical geography of the herpetofauna. Since the present part will be

of interest primarily to systematic herpetologists, I have decided to

separate it from the more general material of interest to

biogeographers.

One of the major problems that faces the worker undertaking a faunal

study is the presence of species or genera of unsettled systematic

status. My work in Michoacan has been no exception; fifteen separate

studies were undertaken in an attempt to solve systematic problems in

certain groups. Some systematic problems still remain but are of little

consequence insofar as the entire faunal picture is concerned, or are so

involved as to be impractical to undertake at this time. In accounts of

species, such problems are mentioned in the hope that they will interest

some worker who will be inclined to investigate them.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

While engaged in the study of the herpetofauna of Michoacan I have built

up a debt of gratitude to many individuals, without whose aid my

ambition to complete my study never would have been realized. I am

especially grateful to those individuals who accompanied me in the

field; Lee D. Beatty, Richard E. Etheridge, Carter R. Gilbert, Fred G.

Thompson, Jerome Tulecke, and John Wellman offered stimulating

companionship and valuable assistance. On many occasions they suffered

hardships on behalf of my interests.

Studies of my own specimens have been augmented by material from other

institutions. For permitting me to examine specimens in their care I am

indebted to W. Frank Blair, Charles M. Bogert, Doris M. Cochran, William

B. Davis, James R. Dixon, the late Emmett R. Dunn, Josef Eiselt, Alice

G. C. Grandison, Norman Hartweg, Robert F. Inger, Arthur Loveridge, the

late Karl P. Schmidt, Hobart M. Smith, Robert C. Stebbins, Margaret

Storey, Edward H. Taylor, and Richard G. Zweifel.

Several people have aided me in the study of specimens and in the

analysis of data; I am grateful to Donald D. Brand, who first introduced

me to Michoacan; since that time I have benefited much from his

knowledge of the area. James A. Peters provided me with essential

information concerning his field work in southern Michoacan in 1950.

James R. Dixon and Floyd L. Downs have permitted me to use freely the

material and data that they accumulated in their recent field work in

Michoacan. Norman E. Hartweg allowed me to use the specimens and data

that he gathered in his survey of the herpetofauna in the region of

Volcan Paricutin. L. C. Stuart, Charles F. Walker, and Richard G.

Zweifel have helped in unraveling some of the systematic and

distributional problems.

I am especially grateful to my wife, Ann, who for six months helped me

track down elusive species and explore new areas. Furthermore, she has

stimulated me to carry this study to completion.

Many people in Michoacan favored the field parties with quarters,

transportation, and valuable information, which greatly facilitated the

field work. In this respect I am especially indebted to Ingeniero Ruben

Erbina of Ingenieros Civiles Asociados, who not only let us use his home

as our headquarters, but through a letter of introduction gave us the

"key" to southern Michoacan. Ingeniero Pedro Tonda aided us in Arteaga

and San Salvador. Ingeniero Anastacio Perez Alfaro of the Comision

Tepalcatepec in Uruapan provided the latest maps of southern Michoacan

and much essential information pertaining to travel conditions in the

area. Senor Nefty Mendoza gave us a home in Dos Aguas; this kindness

allowed us to work in this interesting region during the height of the

rainy season. Mr. and Mrs. Bob Thomas let us make use of their

facilities at Hacienda Zirimicuaro. The naval officers at the Estacion

Marina at Playa Azul made pleasant what might have been a dreadful stay

in that small coastal village. To the managers and pilots of Lineas

Aereas Picho in Uruapan I owe special thanks for going out of their way

on more than one occasion to transport a stranded snake-hunter.

Throughout the months of field work beginning in 1955 I constantly have

been aided by the authorities and workers of the Comision Tepalcatepec,

a subdivision of the Secretaria de Caminos y Obras Publicas, and of the

private corporation, Ingenieros Civiles Asociados. Much of the field

work in Michoacan was made possible only through the co-operation of the

natives who supplied mules, acted as guides, and aided in the collection

of specimens. I have learned a great deal from these people. They will

never see this report. Their work as guides, muleteers, and collectors

greatly assisted me with the mountains of equipment that had to be piled

on the backs of scrawny mules for transportation to places where the

natives seldom trod. Their efforts in behalf of Don Guillermo never will

be forgotten; I extend an especially hearty _muchas gracias_ to

Benjamin, Ignacio, Jesus, Lorenzo, Mariano, and Remigio.

Much of the work on this report was done while I was associated with the

Museum of Zoology at the University of Michigan. I thank Norman E.

Hartweg and T. H. Hubbell for making available to me the facilities of

the museum and for their numerous courtesies that aided me so much.

My field work in Michoacan was supported by the Museum of Zoology at the

University of Michigan (1951), by the Horace H. Rackham School of

Graduate Studies of the University of Michigan (1955), by the Penrose

Fund of the American Philosophical Society (1956), by the Bache Fund of

the National Academy of Sciences (1958), and by the University of Kansas

Endowment Association (1960).

Permits for collecting specimens in Mexico were provided by the

Direccion General de Caza through the courtesy of Ing. Juan Lozano

Franco and Luis Macias Arellano.

Historical Account

Unlike many parts of southern Mexico and northern Central America,

Michoacan received no attention from the collecting expeditions of the

European museums in the last century. The earliest known herpetological

specimens from Michoacan were obtained by Louis John Xantus, who was

appointed U. S. Consul to Colima in 1859. In April, 1863, Xantus

collected at Volcan Jorullo in Michoacan; in April and May of the same

year he collected along the coast of Michoacan between the Rio Cachan

and the Rio Nexpa. His small collection of 19 extant specimens is in the

United States National Museum. Alfredo Duges, a resident of Guanajuato,

Mexico, made early contributions to the knowledge of the herpetofauna of

Michoacan. In 1885 he described _Sonora michoacanensis_, and in 1891 he

described _Eumeces altamirani_; from what is known of the distribution

of these species, he probably had collected in the Tepalcatepec Valley.

During their biological survey of Mexico, Edward W. Nelson and Edward A.

Goldman spent a limited amount of time in Michoacan in 1892 and again in

1903 and 1904. Most of their collecting was done on the plateau in the

north-central part of the state; their collections are in the United

States National Museum. While collecting fishes in southern Mexico, Seth

E. Meek obtained some amphibians and reptiles from Lago de Patzcuaro in

1904; these are in the collections of the Chicago Natural History

Museum. In 1908 Hans Gadow ventured into the then unexplored "tierra

caliente" of the Balsas Valley and collected at Volcan Jorullo and other

localities in the valley. Later in the same year he collected at

Guayabo, San Salvador, and Arteaga in the Sierra de Coalcoman and at

Buena Vista and Cofradia in the Tepalcatepec Valley. His collections

were deposited in the British Museum (Natural History) and the

Naturhistorisches Museum Wien.

The first thirty years of the present century saw little more field work

in Michoacan. In the 1930's Edward H. Taylor and Hobart M. Smith

collected throughout much of Mexico. At various times they worked in

Michoacan, principally along the road from Mexico City to Guadalajara.

In 1935 Hobart M. Smith spent a week at Hacienda El Sabino south of

Uruapan; he revisited the locality again in 1936 and made a large and

important collection of amphibians and reptiles from the upper limits of

the arid tropical scrub forest in the Tepalcatepec Valley. Specimens

collected by Smith and Taylor were incorporated into the Edward H.

Taylor-Hobart M. Smith collection, which subsequently was deposited in

part in the Museum of Natural History at the University of Illinois and

in part in the Chicago Natural History Museum. In 1939 Hobart M. Smith

collected at Patzcuaro and between Uruapan and Apatzingan; these

collections, made while he was a Walter Rathbone Bacon Scholar of the

Smithsonian Institution, are deposited in the United States National

Museum. In 1940 and 1941 Frederick A. Shannon, who was a member of the

Hoogstraal Expeditions under the auspices of the Chicago Natural History

Museum, collected on Cerro de Tancitaro and at Apatzingan; an account of

the specimens collected there was published by Schmidt and Shannon

(1947).

The eruption of Volcan Paricutin in February, 1943, attracted the

attention of many biologists, a group of which from the Museum of

Zoology at the University of Michigan collected in the Cordillera

Volcanica in 1945 and 1947. The amphibians and reptiles were collected

and studied by Norman E. Hartweg. In 1950 James A. Peters accompanied

Donald D. Brand on a preliminary exploration of the western part of the

Sierra de Coalcoman and adjacent Pacific coast of Michoacan; in the same

year Peters collected also on the Mexican Plateau and at Volcan Jorullo.

His specimens are in the Museum of Zoology at the University of

Michigan. Since 1950 many biologists have collected in Michoacan in the

course of work on certain groups of animals or in general surveys. In

this way Raymond Alcorn, Robert W. Dickerman, James R. Dixon, Floyd L.

Downs, Emmet T. Hooper, and Robert R. Miller have contributed to our

knowledge of the herpetofauna.

As stated previously, my own field work in Michoacan began in 1951, when

I accompanied Donald D. Brand on an exploring expedition to the

southern part of the state. In that year a short time was spent on the

Mexican Plateau, principally in the area around Lago de Cuitzeo, and at

Volcan Jorullo. In July and August we made our headquarters at

Coalcoman. From that town the field party travelled southward to Maruata

on the Pacific coast and thence back over the mountains to Coalcoman.

Later in that summer we travelled by mule from Coalcoman southeastward

to the mouth of the Rio Nexpa. In 1955, accompanied by Lee D. Beatty,

Carter R. Gilbert, and Fred G. Thompson, I collected in the Tepalcatepec

Valley and at Coalcoman. We made a mule trip from Coalcoman to Cerro de

Barolosa, where we made the first collections from the pine-fir forests

in the Sierra de Coalcoman. Later in the same summer Carter R. Gilbert

and I spent a week at Playa Azul on the Pacific coast. In March, April,

and May, 1956, my wife and I collected for a short time in the

Cordillera Volcanica and on the Mexican Plateau. In early April we moved

into the Tepalcatepec Valley, where we collected intensively between

Churumuco and Tepalcatepec. In May we collected on the Pacific coast

between Boca de Apiza and La Placita. In July and August, 1956,

accompanied by Richard E. Etheridge, we returned to Michoacan and again

collected on the Mexican Plateau and in the Cordillera Volcanica, before

moving into the Tepalcatepec Valley. In an attempt to fill in gaps in

the known distributions of many species and to sample the fauna in some

previously uncollected areas, I returned to Michoacan in June, 1958.

Accompanied by Jerome B. Tulecke and John Wellman, I collected on the

Mexican Plateau in the northwestern part of the state, on the southern

slopes of the Cordillera Volcanica, and in the Tepalcatepec Valley. Most

of our time was spent in the Sierra de Coalcoman, where we collected at

Aguililla, Artega, and Dos Aguas. In 1960 two days were spent in

Michoacan; a small collection was made in the eastern part of the

Cordillera Volcanica. With the exception of the specimens collected in

1960, which are at the Museum of Natural History at the University of

Kansas, the specimens that I have collected in Michoacan are in the

Museum of Zoology at the University of Michigan.

NATURAL LANDSCAPE

A proper understanding of the geographical distribution of animals in a

given region is possible only after a thorough acquaintance with the

geography of the region. Likewise, in order to gain a knowledge of the

ecological distribution and relationships of the components of the

fauna, it is necessary to study the animals in their natural

environments. In order to give the reader a picture of the physical

features and the major animal habitats within the state of Michoacan,

the following brief description is offered. Each of these facets

mentioned below will be elaborated in detail in my final report on the

herpetofauna of Michoacan.

Physiography

The state of Michoacan comprises an area of 60,093 square kilometers

(Vivo, 1953). Within this area the rugged terrain has a total relief of

nearly 4000 meters. There have been several attempts to classify the

physiographic provinces of Mexico; the classification used here is a

slight modification of the scheme proposed by Tamayo (1949). I have

tried to keep the system as simple as possible, but still useful in

discussing the distribution of animals living in the region. For general

purposes the state of Michoacan can be divided into lowlands and

highlands as follows:

LOWLANDS

Pacific Coastal Plain

Balsas-Tepalcatepec Basin

HIGHLANDS

Mexican Plateau

Cordillera Volcanica

Sierra de Coalcoman

Although the lowlands in the state are continuous, they are only

narrowly connected and thus form two distinct physiographic and biotic

areas. The Pacific Coastal Plain in Michoacan extends for a distance of

about 200 kilometers (airline) from the Rio Coahuayana to the Rio

Balsas. The coastal plain is broad between the Rio Coahuayana and San

Juan de Lima, and between Las Penas and the Rio Balsas, where the hills

rise some 12 kilometers inland from the sea. Between San Juan de Lima

and Las Penas the mountains extend to the sea; in this region rocky

promontories form precipitous cliffs dropping into the sea. Between the

promontories are small sandy or rocky beaches.

Lying to the north of the Sierra de Coalcoman and the Sierra del Sur,

but south of the Cordillera Volcanica, is a broad structural depression,

the Balsas-Tepalcatepec Basin. The western part of this basin, which

separates the Sierra de Coalcoman from the Cordillera Volcanica, is the

valley of the Rio Tepalcatepec, a major tributary of the Rio Balsas. The

eastern part of the basin is the valley of the Rio Balsas. From the

point of junction of the two rivers, the Rio Balsas flows southward

through a narrow gorge, which separates the Sierra de Coalcoman from

the Sierra del Sur, to the Pacific Ocean. In Michoacan the floor of the

Balsas-Tepalcatepec Basin varies from 200 to 700 meters above sea level.

The central part of Mexico is a vast table-land, the Mexican Plateau,

the southern part of which extends into northern Michoacan. In this

region the terrain is rolling and varies from 1500 to 1900 meters above

sea level. Many small mountain ranges rise from the plateau and break

the continuity of the rolling table-land. Located on the southern part

of the Mexican Plateau in Michoacan are several lakes, the largest of

which are Lago de Chapala, Lago de Cuitzeo, and Lago de Patzcuaro.

Bordering the southern edge of the Mexican Plateau is a nearly unbroken

chain of volcanos, the Cordillera Volcanica. The highest peaks in

Michoacan, Cerro San Andres (3930 meters) and Cerro de Tancitaro (3870

meters), are in this range. Parts of the Cordillera Volcanica in

Michoacan are known by separate names; these are, from west to east:

Sierra de los Tarascos, Sierra de Ozumatlan, and Serrania de Ucareo.

Lying between the Tepalcatepec Valley and the Pacific Ocean, and east of

the Rio Coahuayana and west of the Rio Balsas, is an isolated highland

mass, the Sierra de Coalcoman. This mountain range rises to elevations

of slightly more than 3000 meters. It has a length of about 200

kilometers and a width of about 80 kilometers. Except for a relatively

low connection with the Cordillera Volcanica, the Sierra de Coalcoman is

isolated from other mountain ranges in southwestern Mexico.

CLIMATE

The climates in Michoacan vary from tropical in the lowlands to cool

temperate at high elevations in the Sierra de Coalcoman and Cordillera

Volcanica. The highest temperatures are known in the Balsas-Tepalcatepec

Basin, where at Churumuco the mean annual temperature is 29.3 deg. C. and

the range of monthly means is 3.5 deg. C. (Contreras, 1942). Frosts occur

sporadically on the Mexican Plateau, and in the winter snow falls on the

highest mountains.

Precipitation varies geographically and seasonally. Most of the rain

falls between June and October. In the Balsas-Tepalcatepec Basin

rainfall in the rest of the year is negligible. The annual average

rainfall at Coahuayana on the Pacific Coastal Plain is 871 mm.

(Guzman-Rivas, 1957:52). In the Balsas-Tepalcatepec Basin rainfall

seldom exceeds 800 mm. per year. In the mountains precipitation is

heavier and somewhat more evenly distributed throughout the year, but

still definitely cyclic. For example, Uruapan (elevation, 1500 meters)

receives an average annual rainfall of 1674 mm. (Contreras, 1942). The

prevailing winds are from the Pacific Ocean. The southern (windward)

slopes of the Sierra de Coalcoman probably receive more rain than any

other part of the state. The Balsas-Tepalcatepec Basin lies in a rain

shadow of the Sierra de Coalcoman, and the Mexican Plateau lies in a

somewhat less drastic rain shadow of the Cordillera Volcanica; these are

the driest regions in the state.

VEGETATION AND ANIMAL HABITATS

For the purposes of this report I have adopted the classification of

types of vegetation that seem to me most significant in terms of

ecological distribution of reptiles and amphibians in Michoacan. These

types are as follows:

TEMPERATE (1000-4000 meters)

Fir Forest (2400-4000 meters)

Pine-oak Forest (1000-4000 meters)

Mesquite-grassland (1500-2100 meters)

TROPICAL (0-1000 meters)

Arid Tropical Scrub Forest (0-1000 meters)

Tropical Semi-deciduous Forest (150-600 meters)

The vegetation of the Pacific Coastal Plain and the Balsas-Tepalcatepec

Basin consists of arid tropical scrub forest, composed of deciduous

trees, which in many places are stunted and widely spaced. In the dry

season there is little cover provided by this forest. In the rainy

season there is a sparse growth of grasses and some shade provided by

the small leaves of the thorny trees.

In Michoacan the rainfall is heaviest on the southern slopes of the

Sierra de Coalcoman and somewhat less so on the southwestern slopes of

the Cordillera Volcanica. At these relatively low elevations (150 to 600

meters) there is tropical semi-deciduous forest, characterized by

relatively dense shade throughout the year and by a leaf mulch on the

ground. This type of forest forms the gallery forest along the larger

streams in the Balsas-Tepalcatepec Basin and on the Pacific Coastal

Plain.

Rainfall also is heavy on the high mountain ridges, where temperatures

are low. On these ridges, fir forest, often mixed with pine and oaks, is

found. This habitat is characterized by a cool, moist climate, many

rotting logs, and a moist ground cover of leaves and needles.

Most of the mountains are covered with pine-oak forest, which in most

places is decidedly subhumid, but where this forest occurs on the

windward sides of high ridges, it sometimes is noticeably humid. In

this forest the important animal habitats include the needle- and

leaf-litter, and in some areas, bromeliads.

The rolling terrain of the Mexican Plateau supports cacti, small

leguminous trees, and grasses. Like the arid tropical scrub forest, this

type of vegetation, the Mesquite-grassland association, is deciduous and

thus provides little shelter in the dry season. Unlike the areas in

which arid tropical scrub forest is developed, the Mesquite-grassland is

found in areas having warm days and cool nights.

GEOGRAPHY OF THE HERPETOFAUNA

Although the main part of my final report on the herpetofauna of

Michoacan will deal with the geographical and ecological patterns of

distribution of the herpetofauna, a brief summary of the faunal

assemblages is presented here.

In Michoacan there are two major faunal assemblages, one in the

lowlands, and one in the highlands. A large number of the species

inhabiting the lowlands are wide-ranging species, such as _Bufo

marinus_, _Iguana iguana_, and _Boa constrictor_. Sixty-three species

are known to occur on the Pacific Coastal Plain; 41 of these, together

with 36 others occur in the Balsas-Tepalcatepec Basin, a physiographic

region to which several species of reptiles are endemic; for example,

_Enyaliosaurus clarki_, _Urosaurus gadowi_, _Cnemidophorus calidipes_,

and _Eumeces altamirani_.

Generally speaking, the members of the highland faunal assemblage have

more restricted geographic ranges. The major exceptions are those

species that are widely distributed on the Mexican Plateau, such as:

_Bufo compactilis_, _Sceloporus torquatus_, and _Salvadora bairdi_. In

the montane habitats of the Cordillera Volcanica, 45 species of

amphibians and reptiles are known; 34 species have been found in the

Sierra de Coalcoman. Fourteen species are known to occur in both ranges.

Several species are known only from the Cordillera Volcanica and

adjacent highlands, and three species are endemic to the Sierra de

Coalcoman.

ANNOTATED LIST OF SPECIES

In the following pages the 176 species and subspecies of amphibians and

reptiles known to occur in the state of Michoacan are discussed in

relation to their variation, life histories, ecology, and distribution

in the state. Data have been gathered from 9676 specimens. I have not

prolonged the accounts of species with information that has been

presented elsewhere. Consequently, the length and completeness of the

accounts are variable. I have given only the information that I consider

a worthwhile contribution to our knowledge of the particular species.

The synonymies given at the beginning of each account include the first

use of the trivial name by the original author, the first usage of the

combination that I am using, and, if the circumstances make it

necessary, additional names or combinations that have been proposed

since the publication of the checklists of Mexican amphibians and

reptiles by Smith and Taylor (1945, 1948, and 1950b). References cited

only in the synonymies are not listed in the Literature Cited. Preceding

the discussion of each species is an alphabetical list of the localities

in Michoacan from which specimens have been examined. The listing of a

locality means that one or more specimens, as indicated, has been

examined from that locality. Only for those specimens especially

mentioned in the text are catalogue numbers given. Abbreviations for the

various museums and scientific collections are, as follows:

AMNH American Museum of Natural History

ANSP Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

BMNH British Museum (Natural History)

CNHM Chicago Natural History Museum

EHT-HMS Edward H. Taylor-Hobart M. Smith collection

JRD James R. Dixon collection, College Station, Texas

KU University of Kansas Museum of Natural History

MCZ Museum of Comparative Zoology

MVZ Museum of Vertebrate Zoology

NMW Naturhistorisches Museum Wien

SU Stanford University Museum of Natural History

TCWC Texas Cooperative Wildlife Collection

UIMNH University of Illinois Museum of Natural History

UMMZ University of Michigan Museum of Zoology

USNM United States National Museum

UTNHC University of Texas Natural History Collection

Throughout the accounts of the species all measurements are given in

millimeters; if the range of variation is given, the mean follows in

parentheses.

AMPHIBIA

Caudata

~Ambystoma amblycephalum~ Taylor

_Ambystoma amblycephala_ Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull.,

26: 420, November 27, 1940.--Fifteen kilometers west of

Morelia, Michoacan, Mexico.

Fifteen km. W of Morelia (19); 11 km. SSE of Opopeo (12); 8

km. S of Patzcuaro; 24 km. S of Patzcuaro (2); Quiroga (20);

Tacicuaro (167).

Taylor and Smith (1945:530) presented data on 137 specimens collected at

Tacicuaro on October 1, 1939; these are all larvae and metamorphosing

individuals. Aside from these, the largest larva examined (UMMZ 104962

from 15 km. W of Morelia) has a snout-vent length of 70.0 mm. and a tail

length of 53.5 mm. The larvae are pale pinkish tan above and somewhat

paler below; there is a lateral row of cream colored spots. The

tail-fin, which is deepest at mid-length, extends to the back of the

head and is flecked with brown. In small larvae the outer edge of the

tail-fin is dark brown. The eyes are large. Two small metamorphosed

specimens (UMMZ 98967) from 24 kilometers south of Patzcuaro are

tentatively referred to this species. These specimens have body lengths

of 49.0 and 45.0 mm. and tail lengths of 36.0 and 31.5 mm.,

respectively. They have 17-17 and 16-15 vomerine teeth arranged in a

broad arch behind the choanae, 10 costal grooves, and 7 intercostal

spaces between adpressed toes. The dorsal color is uniform brown; that

of the venter is a dusty cream.

Larvae were collected from shallow ponds near Quiroga and 15 kilometers

west of Morelia; metamorphosed individuals were taken from beneath logs

in pine and fir forests at elevations from 2300 to 2800 meters.

~Ambystoma dumerili dumerili~ (Duges)

_Siredon Dumerili_ Duges, La Naturaleza, 1:241, 1870--Lago

de Patzcuaro, Michoacan, Mexico.

_Bathysiredon dumerilii_, Dunn, Notulae Naturae, 36:1,

November 9, 1939.

_Bathysiredon dumerilii dumerilii_, Maldonado-Koerdell, Mem.

y Rev. Acad. Nac. Cien., 56:199, 1948.

_Ambystoma_ (_Bathysiredon_) _dumerili_, Tihen, Bull.

Florida State Mus., 3:3, June 20, 1958.

Lago de Patzcuaro (22);? Morelia.

For many years this unusual salamander was known from only a few

specimens mostly collected in the last century; Smith and Taylor

(1948:7) stated: "It is presumed that this species is extinct owing to

the introduction of exotic game and food fishes." In 1951 and in 1955 I

had been told that _axolotls_ were sold in the market at Patzcuaro;

nevertheless, none was found on my visits there. In 1956 Charles M.

Bogert obtained several large specimens at the market in Patzcuaro.

These establish the continued existence of the salamander in Lago de

Patzcuaro. On January 27, 1955, R. W. Dickerman procured a specimen (KU

41573) in the market at Morelia. Since fish are brought to Morelia from

Lago de Patzcuaro, the specimen probably was from that lake.

Nevertheless, the species may occur in other permanent bodies of water

in Michoacan. Maldonado-Koerdell (1948) described _Bathysiredon dumerili

queretarensis_ from San Juan del Rio, Queretaro. This locality is about

200 airline kilometers northeast of Lago de Patzcuaro and is in the Rio

Moctezuma drainage.

~Ambystoma ordinarium~ Taylor

_Ambystoma ordinaria_ Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull.,

26:422, November 27, 1940.--Four miles west of El Mirador,

near Puerto Hondo, Michoacan, Mexico.

Axolotl (56); Cerro San Andres; 22 km. W of Mil Cumbres; 46

km. E of Morelia (34); 8 km. SE of Opopeo (5); Puerto de

Garnica (8); Puerto Hondo (41); San Gregorio (16); San Jose

de la Cumbre (20).

Of 16 specimens (KU 51520-35) collected on June 18, 1955, near San

Gregorio, 15 are adult females with swollen cloacae and minute ovarian

eggs. Possibly these specimens had just recently deposited their mature

eggs. In preservative the specimens are black above and dull creamy gray

below. Measurements for the 15 females are: snout-vent length,

80.0-102.0 (92.5); tail length, 69.0-93.0 (84.2); head width, 15.8-20.5

(17.7); head length, 22.8-26.6 (24.4). A larval specimen with small

gills has a snout-vent length of 72 mm. and a tail length of 62 mm.

Three specimens have 12 costal grooves; the other have 11.

Of 20 specimens from San Jose de la Cumbre (UMMZ 112857 and 115143), 14

are neotenic adults; the others are larvae. In life the salamanders were

blackish to olive-brown above with scattered cream-colored dots on the

dorsum and flanks but in preservative are dull grayish black with

indistinct pale spots and dark reticulations. The belly is pale gray

with indistinct dark spots. Eleven females and three males have the

following measurements, respectively: snout-vent length, 76.0-90.0

(80.7), 64.0-84.0 (74.3); tail length, 70.0-81.0 (75.0), 58.0-71.0

(66.7); head width, 19.5-23.5 (20.7), 17.5-20.5 (19.3); head length,

22.0-25.0 (23.0), 20.0-22.5 (21.5). The smallest larva has a snout-vent

length of 43.0 mm. and a tail length of 38.0 mm. Two individuals have 12

costal grooves; the others have 11. All of the females contained eggs,

the largest of which were 1.5 mm. in diameter. The stomachs of most of

the specimens were distended with oligochaets, aquatic insect larvae,

and small aquatic beetles.

A series of 34 larvae (JRD 5904-37) from 46 kilometers east of Morelia

are tentatively referred to this species. These specimens are

olive-brown above with cream-colored spots on the flanks; the dorsal

tail-fin does not extend onto the body.

This species has been found only at elevations in excess of 2400 meters

in pine and fir forests. At Rancho Axolotl James A. Peters collected

larvae and neotenic individuals in a rocky stream and adults from

beneath rocks and logs in the forest near the stream. Neotenic

individuals and larvae were found in a clear stream in pine-fir forest

at an elevation of 2700 meters near San Jose de la Cumbre; specimens

were collected there in July, 1955, and again in July, 1956. The site

was visited in April, 1956, at which time the stream consisted of only a

few puddles; no salamanders were found.

~Ambystoma tigrinum velasci~ Duges

_Ambystoma velasci_ Duges, La Naturaleza, ser. 2, 1:142,

1888.--Laguna Santa Isabel, near Guadalupe Hidalgo, Distrito

Federal, Mexico.

_Ambystoma tigrinum velasci_, Dunn, Copeia, no. 3:157,

November 14, 1940.

Patzcuaro (5); Tacicuaro (9).

Definite specific assignment of these specimens, all larvae, cannot be

made at this time. They have shovel-shaped heads and laterally

compressed bodies with the dorsal tail-fin extending anteriorly to the

back of the head. The eyes are small. The body is pale tan with dark

mottling on the tail and flanks. The average snout-vent length for nine

specimens from Tacicuaro is 61.0 mm.

The larvae from Tacicuaro (UMMZ 89255) were collected by Dyfrig Forbes

in October, 1939; those from Patzcuaro, presumably Lago de Patzcuaro

(BMNH 1914.1.28-247-8 and CNHM 948), were collected by Hans Gadow and

Seth Meek in 1908.

~Pseudoeurycea belli~ (Gray)

_Spelerpes belli_ Gray, Catalogue Batrachia Gradientia

British Museum, p. 46, 1850.--Mexico. Type locality

restricted to 2 miles east of Rio Frio, Puebla, Mexico, by

Smith and Taylor (1950a:341).

_Pseudoeurycea bellii_, Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull.,

30:209, June 12, 1944.

Axolotl (2); Carapan; Cerro Tancitaro (84); Macho de Agua;

22 km. W of Mil Cumbres; Opopeo; Patzcuaro (8); Puerto Hondo

(2): San Jose de la Cumbre; San Juan de Parangaricutiro

(42); Uruapan (5); Zacapu (4).

This salamander seems to reach its greatest abundance in Michoacan in

the Sierra de los Tarascos between Patzcuaro and Tancitaro, where it is

found at elevations from 1500 to 2900 meters. It is found less commonly

in the eastern part of the Cordillera Volcanica in Michoacan, where it

sometimes occurs in association with _Pseudoeurycea robertsi_.

On June 22 and 23, 1955, four clutches of eggs of this species were

found beneath adobe bricks and rocks on the volcanic ash that has buried

the village of San Juan de Parangaricutiro. The eggs were unstalked and

separate, but adherent in clumps of three or four (Pl. 2, Fig. 1). The

outer membranes were covered with fine particles of ash. The ash beneath

the stones where the eggs were found was only slightly moist; one clump

of eggs was partially desiccated. Three complete clutches have 20, 23,

and 34 eggs; one clutch of 15 eggs was being eaten by beetles

(Tenebrionidae: _Eleodes_ sp.). The eggs vary in size from 4.6 to 6.5

mm. and average 5.3 mm. in diameter. They are unpigmented. Surrounding

the embryo is a vitelline membrane, an inner, and an outer envelope

(Fig. 1). In an average-sized egg having an embryo 4 mm. in length, the

diameter of the outer membrane is 5.3 mm., the inner membrane 5.0 mm.,

and the vitelline membrane 4.6 mm. All of the eggs contained embryos in

which the limb buds were developed; in about half of these the eyes were

distinctly visible.

[Illustration: Fig. 1. Diagram of an egg of _Pseudoeurycea belli_ from

San Juan de Parangaricutiro, Michoacan. x 10.]

The first heavy rain of the season occurred on the night of June 22,

1955. Thus, at least sometimes, _Pseudoeurycea belli_ lays its eggs

before the onset of the rainy season. A female having a snout-vent

length of 110 mm., collected on June 22, 1955, contained 36 ovarian eggs

having diameters from 3.0 to 3.5 mm. The fact that small juveniles were

collected on the same date indicates that this salamander lays eggs over

a period of several weeks in late spring and early summer.

The smallest juvenile examined has a snout-vent length of 17.0 mm. and a

tail length of 7.5 mm. Twelve juveniles from the vicinity of San Juan de

Parangaricutiro have an average snout-vent length of 19.4 mm. and an

average tail length of 9.7 mm. In juveniles the adpressed limbs either

touch or overlap by one intercostal space; in adults there are two or

three intercostal spaces between adpressed toes. Therefore the greatest

number of intercostal spaces between adpressed limbs is found in the

largest specimens. A similar relationship between adpressed limbs (=

length of limbs) and snout-vent length was shown for _Plethodon

richmondi_ by Duellman (1954a). The number of vomerine teeth is

variable; the number of teeth seems to be closely correlated with the

size of the salamander (Fig. 2). A similar correlation between the

number of maxillary teeth and body length was reported for

_Chiropterotriton multidentatus_ by Rabb (1958). In 12 juvenile

_Pseudoeurycea belli_ there are 6-13 (8.8) vomerine teeth, and in 11

adults having snout-vent lengths greater than 90 mm. there are 39-49

(44.0) vomerine teeth. The coloration of the juveniles resembles that of

the adults (Pl. 1).

[Illustration: FIG. 2. Correlation between the number of vomerine teeth

and snout-vent length in 79 _Pseudoeurycea belli_ from Michoacan.]

The differences between this species and _Pseudoeurycea gigantea_ are

minor. Taylor (1939a) distinguished _gigantea_ from _belli_ by the

larger size, fewer intercostal spaces between adpressed limbs, more

vomerine teeth, and absence of occipital spots in _gigantea_. Taylor and

Smith (1945) stated that in life the spots in _gigantea_ are orange

instead of red as in _belli_. Five specimens of _Pseudoeurycea belli_

from Michoacan, including one juvenile, lack occipital spots. In the 34

living individuals that I have seen from Michoacan the spots varied from

deep red to orange. Therefore, of the characters listed by Taylor (_op.

cit._) to diagnose _Pseudoeurycea gigantea_, only the over-all larger

size and smaller number of intercostal spaces between adpressed limbs (=

relatively longer limbs) are useful in separating _Pseudoeurycea belli_

and _gigantea_.

~Pseudoeurycea robertsi~ (Taylor)

_Oedipus robertsi_ Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 25:287,

July 10, 1939.--Nevado de Toluca, Mexico.

_Pseudoeurycea robertsi_ Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull.,

30:209, June 12, 1944.

Atzimba (3); Macho de Agua (9); Puerto Lengua de Vaca (14).

Previously this species has been recorded only from the type locality.

In July, 1956, individuals referable to this species were found at two

sites in pine-fir forest immediately to the east of Macho de Agua and in

pine-oak-fir forest at Atzimba. On August 20, 1958, a series was

collected in pine-fir forest at Puerto Lengua de Vaca. These localities

are between 2900 and 3000 meters in the Cordillera Volcanica in eastern

Michoacan.

In life the coloration of these salamanders was highly variable. The

belly and undersurfaces of the tail and hind limbs were pale gray, with

or without silvery white flecks; the chin was a cream-color and flecked

with silvery white in some specimens. The middorsal area was brown,

orange-brown, or dull grayish yellow. The flanks and lateral surfaces of

the tail were black with yellowish flecks or streaks on the flanks and

yellowish or orange-brown flecks on the tail. The iris was golden brown.

Measurements of eight males and two females are, respectively:

snout-vent length, 42.5-56.0 (49.5), 54.0-60.0 (57.0); tail length,

42.0-56.0 (48.1), 52.0-55.0 (53.5). The smallest juvenile has a

snout-vent length of 28.0 mm. and a tail length of 23.0 mm. Of the 26

available specimens, six have 12 costal grooves, and the others have 11.

In comparison with 36 topotypes, the specimens from Michoacan have a

less striking dorsal color pattern; none has a well-defined dorsal

reddish brown area or bold reddish mottling on the tail. Furthermore,

the specimens from Michoacan have paler venters than do topotypic

specimens.

Salientia

~Rhinophrynus dorsalis~ Dumeril and Bibron

_Rhinophrynus dorsalis_ Dumeril and Bibron, Erpetologie

generale, vol. 8:758, 1841.--Veracruz, Veracruz, Mexico.

Mouth of the Rio Balsas (10).

These specimens (BMNH 1914.1.28.181-90) were collected by Gadow in 1908

and reported by him (1930:72): "Whilst this very sluggish termite-eating

toad is common enough in the sweltering hot country of the state of Vera

Cruz, up to an elevation of 1500 feet, it was unknown on the west side

of the Isthmus until I found it in great numbers near the mouth of the

Balsas River, in and near fresh-water pools, where it attracted

attention by its loud peculiar voice during the pairing season in the

month of July." Subsequently, Peters (1954:3) verified the

identification of these specimens. Although torrential rains fell during

the week in July, 1955, that I spent at Playa Azul near the mouth of the

Rio Balsas, the distinctive voice of _Rhinophrynus_ was not heard.

Elsewhere on the Pacific coast of Mexico adult _Rhinophrynus_ have been

reported only from Tehuantepec and a few localities on the coastal

lowlands of Chiapas. Taylor (1942b:37) found on the coast of Guerrero a

tadpole that was referred to the genus _Rhinophrynus_ by Orton (1943).

In the summer of 1960 adults of _Rhinophrynus_ were collected near

Acapulco, Guerrero (Fouquette, _in litt._). These recent collections

verify the existence of the species along the Pacific lowlands of Mexico

at least as far north as Michoacan.

~Scaphiopus hammondi multiplicatus~ Cope

_Scaphiopus multiplicatus_ Cope, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci.

Philadelphia, 15:52, June 8, 1863.--Valley of Mexico.

_Scaphiopus hammondi multiplicatus_, Kellogg, Bull. U. S.

Natl. Mus., 160:22, March 31, 1932.

Angahuan (5); Cuitzeo (4); Cuseno Station (2); Jiquilpan

(9); Morelia (7); Patzcuaro (3); Quiroga; Tarecuaro; Uruapan

(24); Zacapu.

This small toad has been found at elevations between 1500 and 2500

meters on the Mexican Plateau and associated mountain ranges; it occurs

in mesquite-grassland and in pine forests. Calling males and females

laden with eggs have been collected in the rainy season in the months of

July and August. The call is a medium-pitched snore. In living

individuals the dorsal ground color varies from pale brown to gray with

dark brown or olive-brown markings. In many individuals the tips of the

small dorsal pustules are red.

~Bufo coccifer~ Cope

_Bufo coccifer_ Cope, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia,

18:130, 1866--Arriba, Costa Rica.

Apatzingan (27); Lombardia; Nueva Italia (5).

In life the dorsal color pattern consists of a yellowish tan ground

color with dark brown spots; the middorsal stripe is deep yellow or

cream color. The venter is a dusty cream color, and the iris is pale

gold. Males have dark brown horny nuptial tuberosities on the thumb. The

following measurements are of 21 males and four females, respectively:

snout-vent length, 43.5-51.7 (48.1), 55.6-62.6 (59.1); tibia length,

16.6-18.8 (17.6), 18.8-20.3 (19.3); head width, 16.7-19.7 (18.4),

20.6-22.2 (21.4); head length, 13.8-16.6 (14.8), 16.5-18.2 (17.3).

The specimens from the Tepalcatepec Valley differ slightly from

specimens from southeastern Mexico and Central America. Those from

Michoacan have low and narrow cranial crests; in about one-half of the

specimens the occipital crest exists only as a row of tubercles, and in

some the postorbital and suborbital crests are barely discernible.

Specimens from the southern part of the range, Costa Rica and Nicaragua,

have much higher and thicker cranial crests; in these the occipital

crest is well defined and extends posteriorly to a point back of the

anterior edge of the parotid gland; the postorbital and suborbital

crests are well marked. Of 48 specimens from Esquipulas, Guatemala, all

have high crests, but these are not so well developed as in ten

specimens from Matagalpa, Nicaragua, and three from various localities

in Costa Rica. Six specimens from Tehuantepec, Oaxaca, have cranial

crests that are lower than those in specimens from Guatemala. In three

of the specimens from Tehuantepec the occipital crests are reduced to a

series of tubercles. Of six specimens from Agua del Obispo, Guerrero,

four have poorly developed occipital crests. These observations suggest

the presence of a cline in the development of the cranial crests;

specimens have higher crests in the southern part of the range than in

the northern part.

In Mexico _Bufo coccifer_ has been collected only in semi-xeric

habitats, but to the south, from Guatemala to Costa Rica, it has been

found in more upland and humid habitats. Southern specimens are darker

than those from the north, a possible correlation with the differences

in habitat.

These toads probably range throughout the Tepalcatepec Valley, but they

are unknown from the coast of Michoacan. Breeding choruses were found

after heavy rains on June 24, 1955, and on August 2, 1956. The first was

in a muddy ditch; the second was in a flooded grassy field. The call is

a high-pitched, but not loud, "whirrr." Males were calling from the edge

of the water or from clumps of grass in the water. Clasping pairs were

in the water; amplexus is axillary.

~Bufo compactilis compactilis~ Wiegmann

_Bufo compactilis_ Wiegmann, Isis von Oken, 26:661,

1833.--Mexico. Type locality restricted to Xochimilco,

Distrito Federal, Mexico, by Smith and Taylor (1950a:330).

_Bufo compactilis compactilis_, Smith, Herpetologica, 4:7,

September 17, 1947.

Cuitzeo (2); Emiliano Zapata (20); Jiquilpan (5); La Palma

(5); Morelia; Tupataro.

The Amphibians and Reptiles of Michoacán, México · 第 1 / 15 段