G.A.S.

_Mistake in Gibbon_ (No. 21. p. 341.).--The passage in Gibbon has an

error more interesting than the mere mistake of the author. That a

senator should make a motion to be repeated and chanted by the rest,

would be rather a strange thing; but the tumultuous acclamations

chanted by the senators as parodies of those in praise of Commodus,

which had been usual at the Theatres (Dio), were one thing; the vote

or decree itself, which follows, is another.

There are many errors, no doubt, to be found in Gibbon. I will mention

one which may be entertaining, though I dare say Mr. Milman has found

it out. In chap. 47. (and _see_ note 26.), Gibbon was too happy to

make the most of the murder of the female philosopher Hypatia, by a

Christian mob at Alexandria. But the account which he gives is more

shocking than the fact. He seems not to have been familiar enough with

Greek to recollect that [Greek: haneilon] means _killed_. Her throat

was cut with an oyster-shell, because, for a reason which he has very

acutely pointed out, oyster-shells were at hand; but she was clearly

not "cut in pieces," nor, "her flesh scraped off the bones," till

after she was dead. Indeed, there was no scraping from the bones at

all. That they used oyster-shells is a proof that the act was not

premeditated. Neither did she deserve the title of modest which

Gibbon gives her. Her way of rejecting suitors is disgusting enough

in Suidas.

Notes and Queries, Number 24, April 13, 1850 · 第 94 / 107 题