CHAPTER I

PEEPS AT HERALDRY

AGENTS

AMERICA THE MACMILLAN COMPANY

64 & 66 FIFTH AVENUE, NEW YORK

AUSTRALASIA OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

205 FLINDERS LANE, MELBOURNE

CANADA THE MACMILLAN COMPANY OF CANADA, LTD.

ST. MARTIN'S HOUSE, 70 BOND STREET, TORONTO

INDIA MACMILLAN & COMPANY, LTD.

MACMILLAN BUILDING, BOMBAY

309 BOW BAZAAR STREET, CALCUTTA

[Illustration: PLATE 1.

HERALD, SHOWING TABARD ORIGINALLY WORN OVER MAIL ARMOUR.]

[Illustration:

PEEPS AT HERALDRY

BY

PH[OE]BE ALLEN

CONTAINING 8 FULL-PAGE ILLUSTRATIONS

IN COLOUR AND NUMEROUS LINE

DRAWINGS IN THE TEXT

LONDON

ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK

1912

]

TO MY COUSIN

ELIZABETH MAUD ALEXANDER

CONTENTS

CHAPTER PAGE

I. AN INTRODUCTORY TALK ABOUT HERALDRY 1

II. THE SHIELD--ITS FORM, POINTS, AND TINCTURES 8

III. DIVISIONS OF THE SHIELD 16

IV. THE BLAZONING OF ARMORIAL BEARINGS 24

V. COMMON OR MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES 31

VI. ANIMAL CHARGES 39

VII. ANIMAL CHARGES (CONTINUED) 47

VIII. ANIMAL CHARGES (CONTINUED) 56

IX. INANIMATE OBJECTS AS CHARGES 63

X. QUARTERING AND MARSHALLING 70

XI. FIVE COATS OF ARMS 74

XII. PENNONS, BANNERS, AND STANDARDS 80

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

PLATE

1. HERALD SHOWING TABARD, ORIGINALLY WORN

OVER MAIL ARMOUR _frontispiece_

FACING PAGE

2. THE DUKE OF LEINSTER 8

Arms: Arg. saltire gu.

Crest: Monkey statant ppr., environed

round the loins and chained or.

Supporters: Two monkeys environed

and chained or.

Motto: Crom a boo.

3. MARQUIS OF HERTFORD 16

Arms: Quarterly, 1st and 4th, or on a pile

gu., between 6 fleurs-de-lys az., 3 lions

passant guardant in pale or; 2nd and 3rd gu.,

2 wings conjoined in lure or. Seymour.

Crest: Out of a ducal coronet or a ph[oe]nix

ppr.

Supporters: Two blackamoors.

Motto: Fide et amore.

4. THE EARL OF SCARBOROUGH 41

Arms: Arg. a fesse gu. between 3 parrots vert,

collared of the second.

Crest: A pelican in her piety.

Supporters: Two parrots, wings inverted vert.

Motto: Murus aëneus conscientia sana.

5. BARON HAWKE 48

Arms: Arg. a chevron erminois between three

pilgrim's staves purpure.

Crest: A hawk, wings displayed and inverted

ppr., belled and charged on the breast with

a fleur-de-lys or.

Supporters: Dexter, Neptune; sinister, a

sea-horse.

Motto: Strike.

6. SIR WILLIAM HERSCHEL 73

Arms: Arg. on mount vert, representation of

the 40 feet reflecting telescope with its

apparatus ppr., on a chief az., the

astronomical symbol of Uranus irradiated or.

Crest: A demi-terrestrial sphere ppr.,

thereon an eagle, wings elevated or.

Motto: C[oe]lis exploratis.

7. THE FLAGS OF GREAT BRITAIN 80

(1) The Union Jack, (2) The Royal Standard.

8. A CRUSADER IN MAIL ARMOUR _on the cover_

_Also fifty-five small black and white illustrations

throughout the text._

"... The noble science once

The study and delight of every gentleman."

"And thus the story

Of great deeds was told."

PEEPS AT HERALDRY

CHAPTER I

AN INTRODUCTORY TALK ABOUT HERALDRY

What is heraldry?

The art of heraldry, or armoury, as the old writers called it,

consists in blazoning the arms and telling the descent and history

of families by certain pictorial signs. Thus from age to age an

authenticated register of genealogies has been kept and handed on from

generation to generation. The making and keeping of these records have

always been the special duty of a duly appointed herald.

Perhaps you think that explanation of heraldry sounds rather dull, but

you will soon find out that very much that is interesting and amusing,

too, is associated with the study of armorial bearings.

For heraldry, which, you know, was reckoned as one of the prime

glories of chivalry, is the language that keeps alive the golden deeds

done in the world, and that is why those who have once learnt its

secrets are always anxious to persuade others to learn them too.

"Although," says the old writer, Montague; "our ancestors were little

given to study, they held a knowledge of heraldry to be indispensable,

because they considered that it was the outward sign of the spirit of

chivalry and the index also to a lengthy chronicle of doughty deeds."

Now, it is in a language that is all its own that heraldry tells its

stories, and it is unlike any other in which history has been written.

This language, as expressed in armorial bearings, contains no words,

no letters, even, for signs and devices do the work of words, and very

well they do it. And as almost every object, animate and inanimate,

under the sun was used to compose this alphabet, we shall find as we

go on that not only are the sun, moon and stars, the clouds and the

rainbow, fountains and sea, rocks and stones, trees and plants of all

kinds, fruits and grain, pressed into the service of this heraldic

language, but that all manner of living creatures figure as well in

this strange alphabet, from tiny insects, such as bees and flies and

butterflies, to the full-length representations of angels, kings,

bishops, and warriors. Mythical creatures--dragons and cockatrices,

and even mermaidens--have also found their way into heraldry, just

as we find traditions and legends still lingering in the history of

nations, like the pale ghosts of old-world beliefs.

And as though heavenly bodies and plants and animals were not

sufficient for their purpose, heralds added yet other "letters"

to their alphabet in the shape of crowns, maces, rings, musical

instruments, ploughs, scythes, spades, wheels, spindles, lamps, etc.

Each of these signs, as you can easily understand, told a story of its

own, as did also the towers, castles, arches, bridges, bells, cups,

ships, anchors, hunting-horns, spears, bows, arrows, and many other

objects, which, with their own special meaning, we shall gradually

find introduced into the language of heraldry.

But perhaps by now you are beginning to wonder how you can possibly

learn one-half of what all these signs are meant to convey, but

you will not wonder about that long, for heraldry has its own

well-arranged grammar, and grammar, as you know, means fixed rules

which are simple guides for writing or speaking a language correctly.

Moreover, happily both for teacher and learner, the fish and birds and

beasts (as well as all the other objects we have just mentioned) do

not come swarming on to our pages in shoals and flocks and herds, but

we have to do with them either singly or in twos and threes.

Now, even those people who know nothing about heraldry are quite

familiar with the term, "a coat of arms." They know, too, that it

means the figure of a shield, marked and coloured in a variety of

ways, so as to be distinctive of individuals, families, etc.

But why do we speak of it as a _coat_ of arms when there is nothing to

suggest such a term?

I will tell you.

In the far-away days of quite another age, heraldry was so closely

connected with warlike exploits, and its signs and tokens were so much

used on the battle-field to distinguish friends from foes, that each

warrior wore his own special badge, embroidered on the garment or

_surcoat_ which covered his armour, as well as, later on, upon the

shield which he carried into battle.

And this reminds us of the poor Earl of Gloucester's fate at the

Battle of Bannockburn. For, having forgotten to put on his surcoat, he

was slain by the enemy, though we are told that "the _Scottes_ would

gladly have kept him for a ransom had they only recognized him for the

Earl, but he had forgot to put on his coat of armour!"

On the other hand, we have good reason to remember that the "flower of

knighthood," Sir John Chandos, lost _his_ life because he _did_ wear

his white sarcenet robe emblazoned with his arms. For it was because

his feet became entangled in its folds (as Froissart tells us) in his

encounter with the French on the Bridge of Lussac, that he stumbled

on the slippery ground on that early winter's morning, and thus was

quickly despatched by the enemy's blows.

"Now, the principal end for which these signs were first taken up and

put in use," says Guillim, "was that they might serve as notes and

marks to distinguish tribes, families and particular persons from the

other. Nor was this their only use. They also served to describe the

nature, quality, and disposition of their bearer."

Sir G. Mackenzie goes farther, and declares that heraldry was

invented, or, at any rate, kept up, for two chief purposes:

_First_, in order to perpetuate the memory of great actions and noble

deeds. _Secondly_, that governors might have the means of encouraging

others to perform high exploits by rewarding their deserving subjects

by a cheap kind of immortality. (To our ears that last sentence sounds

rather disrespectful to the honour of heraldry.)

Thus, for example, King Robert the Bruce gave armorial bearings to

the House of Wintoun, which represented a falling crown supported by

a sword, to show that its members had supported the crown in its

distress, while to one Veitch he gave a bullock's head, "to _remember_

posterity" that the bearer had succoured the King with food in

bringing some bullocks to the camp, when he was in want of provisions.

Some derive their names as well as their armorial bearings from some

great feat that they may have performed. Thus:

"The son of Struan Robertson for killing of a wolf in Stocket Forest

by a durk--dirk--in the King's presence, got the name of Skein, which

signifies a dirk in Irish, and three durk points in pale for his

arms."

We shall meet with numbers of other instances in heraldry where

armorial bearings were bestowed upon the ancestors of their present

bearers for some special reason, which is thereby commemorated.

Indeed, it is most interesting and amusing to collect the legends as

well as the historical facts which explain the origin and meaning of

different coats of arms.

Here are a few instances of some rather odd charges. (A charge is the

heraldic term given to any object which is _charged_, or represented,

on the shield of a coat of arms.)

To begin with the Redman family:

They bear three pillows, the origin of which Guillim explains--viz.:

"This coat of arms is given to the Redman family for this reason:

Having been challenged to single combat by a stranger, and the day and

the place for that combat having been duly fixed, Redman being more

forward than his challenger, came so early to the place that he fell

asleep in his tent, whilst waiting for the arrival of his foe.

"The people being meanwhile assembled and the hour having struck, the

trumpets sounded to the combat, whereupon Redman, suddenly awakening

out of his sleep, ran furiously upon his adversary and slew him. And

so the pillows were granted to him as armorial bearings, to remind all

men of the doughty deed which he awakened from sleep to achieve."

In many cases the charges on a coat of arms reflect the name or the

calling of the bearer.

When this happens they are called "allusive" arms, sometimes also

"canting," which latter word is a literal translation of the French

term, _armes chantantes_, although, as a matter of fact, _armes

parlantes_ is a more usual term. Here are some examples of allusive

arms.

The Pyne family bear three pineapples, the Herrings bear three

herrings, one, Camel of Devon, bears a camel _passant_; the Oxendens

bear three oxen; Sir Thomas Elmes bears five elm-leaves; three soles

figure on the coat of arms of the Sole family, and to the description

of the last armorial charge, old Guillim quaintly adds:

"By the delicateness of his taste, the sole hath gained the name of

the partridge of the sea."

The arms of the Abbot of Ramsey furnish, perhaps, one of the most

glaring examples of canting heraldry, for on his shield a ram is

represented struggling in the sea!

On the shield of the Swallow family we find the mast of a ship with

all its rigging disappearing between the capacious jaws of a whale,

whilst the Bacons bear a boar.

But whoever designed the coat of arms of a certain Squire Malherbe

must have surely been in rather a spiteful mood, and certainly had a

turn for punning. For on that gentleman's shield we find three leaves

of the stinging-nettle boldly charged!

In the armorial bearings of the Butler family we see allusion made to

their calling in the charge of three covered cups, which commemorates

the historical fact that the ancestor of the present Marquis of

Ormonde, Theobald Walter by name, was made Chief Butler of Ireland

by Henry II. in 1171, an office which was held by seven successive

generations of the Ormonde family. The family of Call charge _their_

shield very appropriately with three silver trumpets.

The Foresters bear bugle horns; the Trumpingtons, three trumpets.

Three eel-spears were borne by the family of Strathele, this being

the old name given to a curious fork, set in a long wooden handle, and

used by fishermen to spear the eels in mud.

The Graham Briggs charge a bridge upon their coat of arms.

A tilting spear was granted as his armorial bearings to William

Shakespeare, which he bore as a single charge; a single spear was also

borne appropriately by one Knight of Hybern.

As a last example of allusive arms, we may quote a comparatively

modern example--viz., the coat of arms of the Cunard family.

Here we find three anchors charged upon the field, in obvious allusion

to Sir Samuel Cunard, the eminent merchant of Philadelphia and the

founder of the House of Cunard.

Peeps at Heraldry · 第 1 / 12 章