THE BIRTH-TIME OF THE WORLD [1]

LONG ago Lucretius wrote: "For lack of power to solve the

question troubles the mind with doubts, whether there was ever a

birth-time of the world and whether likewise there is to be any

end." "And if" (he says in answer) "there was no birth-time of

earth and heaven and they have been from everlasting, why before

the Theban war and the destruction of Troy have not other poets

as well sung other themes? Whither have so many deeds of men so

often passed away, why live they nowhere embodied in lasting

records of fame? The truth methinks is that the sum has but a

recent date, and the nature of the world is new and has but

lately had its commencement."[2]

Thus spake Lucretius nearly 2,000 years ago. Since then we have

attained another standpoint and found very different limitations.

To Lucretius the world commenced with man, and the answer he

would give to his questions was in accord with his philosophy: he

would date the birth-time of the world from the time when

[1] A lecture delivered before the Royal Dublin Society, February

6th, 1914. _Science Progress_, vol. ix., p. 37

[2] _De Rerum Natura_, translated by H. A. J. Munro (Cambridge,

1886).

1

poets first sang upon the earth. Modern Science has along with

the theory that the Earth dated its beginning with the advent of

man, swept utterly away this beautiful imagining. We can, indeed,

find no beginning of the world. We trace back events and come to

barriers which close our vista--barriers which, for all we know,

may for ever close it. They stand like the gates of ivory and of

horn; portals from which only dreams proceed; and Science cannot

as yet say of this or that dream if it proceeds from the gate of

horn or from that of ivory.

In short, of the Earth's origin we have no certain knowledge; nor

can we assign any date to it. Possibly its formation was an event

so gradual that the beginning was spread over immense periods. We

can only trace the history back to certain events which may with

considerable certainty be regarded as ushering in our geological

era.

Notwithstanding our limitations, the date of the birth-time of

our geological era is the most important date in Science. For in

taking into our minds the spacious history of the universe, the

world's age must play the part of time-unit upon which all our

conceptions depend. If we date the geological history of the

Earth by thousands of years, as did our forerunners, we must

shape our ideas of planetary time accordingly; and the duration

of our solar system, and of the heavens, becomes comparable with

that of the dynasties of ancient nations. If by millions of

years, the sun and stars are proportionately venerable. If by

hundreds or thousands of millions of

2

years the human mind must consent to correspondingly vast epochs

for the duration of material changes. The geological age plays

the same part in our views of the duration of the universe as the

Earth's orbital radius does in our views of the immensity of

space. Lucretius knew nothing of our time-unit: his unit was the

life of a man. So also he knew nothing of our space-unit, and he

marvels that so small a body as the sun can shed so much, heat

and light upon the Earth.

A study of the rocks shows us that the world was not always what

it now is and long has been. We live in an epoch of denudation.

The rains and frosts disintegrate the hills; and the rivers roll

to the sea the finely divided particles into which they have been

resolved; as well as the salts which have been leached from them.

The sediments collect near the coasts of the continents; the

dissolved matter mingles with the general ocean. The geologist

has measured and mapped these deposits and traced them back into

the past, layer by layer. He finds them ever the same;

sandstones, slates, limestones, etc. But one thing is not the

same. _Life_ grows ever less diversified in character as the

sediments are traced downwards. Mammals and birds, reptiles,

amphibians, fishes, die out successively in the past; and barren

sediments ultimately succeed, leaving the first beginnings of

life undecipherable. Beneath these barren sediments lie rocks

collectively differing in character from those above: mainly

volcanic or poured out from fissures in

3

the early crust of the Earth. Sediments are scarce among these

materials.[1]

There can be little doubt that in this underlying floor of

igneous and metamorphic rocks we have reached those surface

materials of the earth which existed before the long epoch of

sedimentation began, and before the seas came into being. They

formed the floor of a vaporised ocean upon which the waters

condensed here and there from the hot and heavy atmosphere. Such

were the probable conditions which preceded the birth-time of the

ocean and of our era of life and its evolution.

It is from this epoch we date our geological age. Our next

purpose is to consider how long ago, measured in years, that

birth-time was.

That the geological age of the Earth is very great appears from

what we have already reviewed. The sediments of the past are many

miles in collective thickness: yet the feeble silt of the rivers

built them all from base to summit. They have been uplifted from

the seas and piled into mountains by movements so slow that

during all the time man has been upon the Earth but little change

would have been visible. The mountains have again been worn down

into the ocean by denudation and again younger mountains built

out of their redeposited materials. The contemplation of such

vast events

[1] For a description of these early rocks, see especially the

monograph of Van Hise and Leith on the pre-Cambrian Geology of

North America (Bulletin 360, U.S. Geol. Survey).

4

prepares our minds to accept many scores of millions of years or

hundreds of millions of years, if such be yielded by our

calculations.

The Birth-Time of the World and Other Scientific Essays · 第 24 / 93 题