CHAPTER XXXV.

THE GYPSY FORTUNE-TELLER.

The ever-recurring excitements and excesses of which these people’s

life is made up cannot fail to have a deteriorating effect on mind

and body—early undermined constitutions and premature death or

dotage being the penalty paid by many for the unbridled and senseless

gratification of their passions. This life, however, while it destroys

many, sharpens the faculties of those whose stronger natures have

enabled them to defy these ravages, bestowing a singular power of

penetration in all matters relating to the senses and passions.

More especially is this the case with regard to the women, who, already

gifted by nature with keener perceptions, and prematurely ripened in

what may be termed a tropical atmosphere of passion, develop an almost

supernatural power of clairvoyance, which enables them with incredible

celerity to unravel hitherto undisclosed secrets by means only of

intuitive deductions.

“The astounding vividness of their impressions” (again to quote Liszt

on the subject) “rarely fails to communicate itself like wildfire to

the hearers. As by the contagion of a deadly poison, the mere touch of

the gypsy fortune-teller is often sufficient to affect them with the

sensation of an electric shock or vibration.

“A few apt reflections strewed about in conversation, casual

exclamations of apparent simplicity, some primitive rhymes and verses

accentuated by passion, so to say hammered into relief like the raised

figures on a medal—such are the means which suffice to stir up in an

audience whatever elements may be there existing of secret wrath, of

latent rebellion, of characters bent but not broken, of affections

discouraged but not despairing.

[Illustration: GYPSY MOTHER AND CHILD.]

“The gypsy woman, herself well acquainted with all the signs and

workings of passion, distinguishes _à coup d’œil_ the cause of the

sallow cheek and the fevered eye of such another woman; she can feel

instinctively whether the hand from which she is expected to decipher

a fate be stretched towards her with the hasty gesture of hope or with

the hesitation of fear. Without difficulty she reads in disdainfully

curled lips or ominously drawn brows whether the youth before her be

chafing under a yoke or planning revenge; whether he craves love or has

already lost it. She can further distinguish at a glance the delusive

presumption of youth and beauty—the false security of possession which

thinks to defy misfortune. She knows the annihilating blows of fate

and the vulnerability of the human heart too well not to mistrust the

smile of over-conscious happiness, and prophesy misfortune to those who

refuse to believe in the instability of the future.

“She cannot be called a hypocrite, for she herself has faith in her

own diagnosis; believing that each man carries within him the germ of

his own fate, she is convinced that sooner or later her prognostics

must be fulfilled. Her only care is therefore to clothe her predictions

in a form which, easily captivating the imagination, and thereby

impressed on the memory, will spring again to life, along with the

image of the prophetess, whenever the latent emotions she has detected,

having reached their culminating point, bring about the success or the

catastrophe foreseen from the investigation of a hand and a heart.

“After all, why should we wonder that the secrets of the future can be

deciphered by one so intimately acquainted with the inmost folds of

the human soul, and the workings of different passions confined in the

human breast like so many caged lions or torpid slumbering reptiles?

“Passion always accompanied by a powerful sympathetic instinct quickly

divines the presence of a kindred passion. Apt to decipher the symptoms

inevitably betrayed in voice and gesture, and skilled to read in that

mystic book whose characters are so plainly impressed on the leaves of

a physiognomy which, betraying where it would fain conceal, becomes

the more impressive in proportion as the heart within is agitated by

tumultuous throbbings, the gypsy fortune-teller knows full well with

whom she has to deal, and can justly estimate what sort of characters

are those who seek her counsel.”

It is, I think, Balzac who has said, “Si le passé a laissé des traces,

il est à croire que l’avenir possède des racines;” and on the principle

that every man is master of his own fate, there is, after all, no

reason why these roots, invisible to the rest of the world, should not

be perceptible to such as have made of this subject the study of a

lifetime. Why should not the seer be able to proclaim the fruits to be

reaped from the recognition of germs which already exist?

The enlightened folk who sweepingly condemn the fortune-teller as a

liar and cheat are probably no less mistaken than witless rustics, who

blindly believe in her as an infallible oracle. Should not precisely

the superior enlightenment of which we boast be argument for, rather

than against, the fortune-teller? Why, if phrenology and graphology are

permitted to take rank as acknowledged sciences, should not the gypsy

woman’s power of divination be equally allowed to count as a shrewd

deciphering of character, coupled with logical deductions as to the

events likely to be evoked by the passions she has recognized, when

brought into combination with a given set of circumstances?

Ignorant people, surprised at the detection of secrets which they

had believed to be securely locked up in their own breasts, and not

understanding the process by which such conclusions were reached,

are ready to attribute the fortune-teller’s power of divination to

supernatural agency, which opinion is strengthened and confirmed by

the romantic conditions of the gypsy’s existence, and the cabalistic

glamour with which she contrives to invest herself.

But is not, in truth, this delicate and subtle perception in itself a

secret and undeniable power—a sudden inspiration, a positive intuition

of what will be from the rapid unveiling of what already is? And here,

again, Liszt is probably right in asserting this gift of prophecy,

so universally ascribed to the gypsies in all countries, to be a too

deeply rooted belief in the minds of the people not to have some

rational ground for its existence.

There is no doubt that the gypsy fortune-tellers in Transylvania

exercise considerable influence on their Saxon and Roumanian neighbors,

and it is a paradoxical fact that the self-same people who regard the

Tziganes as undoubted thieves, liars, and cheats in all the common

transactions of daily life, do not hesitate to confide in them blindly

for charmed medicines and love-potions, and are ready to attribute to

them unerring power in deciphering the mysteries of the future.

The Saxon peasant will, it is true, often drive away the fortune-teller

with blows and curses from his door, but his wife will as often

secretly beckon her in again by the back entrance, in order to be

consulted as to the illness of the cows, or beg from her a remedy

against the fever.

Wonderful potions and salves, composed of the fat of bears, dogs,

snakes, and snails, along with the oil of rain-worms, the bodies

of spiders and midges, rubbed into a paste, are concocted by these

cunning bohemians, who thus sometimes contrive to make thrice as much

money out of the carcass of a dead dog as another can realize from the

sale of a healthy pig or calf. There is not a village in Transylvania

which cannot boast of one or more such fortune-tellers, and living

in the suburbs of each town are many old women who make an easy and

comfortable livelihood out of the credulity of their fellow-creatures.

It has also been asserted that both Roumanian and Saxon mothers whose

sickly infants are believed to be suffering from the effects of the

evil eye, are often in the habit of giving the child to be nursed for

a period of nine days to some Tzigane woman supposed to have power to

undo the spell.

For my own part, I have seldom had inclination to confide the

deciphering of my fate to one of these wandering sibyls, and can

therefore only affirm that on the solitary occasion when, half in

jest, I chose to interrogate the future, I was favored with a piece of

intelligence so startling and improbable as could only be received with

a laugh of derision; yet before many days had elapsed this startling

and improbable event had actually come to pass, and the gypsy’s

prophecy was accomplished in the most unlooked-for manner.

Chance, probably, or coincidence, most people will say; and indeed

I do not myself see how it could have been anything but the veriest

coincidence. I merely state this fact as it occurred, and without

attempting to draw any general conclusions from the isolated instance

within my own personal range of observation.

The Land Beyond the Forest: Facts, Figures, and Fancies from Transylvania · 第 35 / 56 章