CHAPTER XXVII

THE YOUNGEST NAVY IN THE WORLD

On the morning when the news of the sinking of the _Emden_ reached

London there was at least one good Briton of that city whose elation

was curiously mingled with puzzlement. He was puzzled to know how

Australia came by a navy; he had seen references to an Australian

navy before, but had always supposed that a misprint had been made

for "Austrian navy."

His wonder is so far excusable that the first ship of that navy

was only launched as recently as 1911, when the battle cruiser

_Australia_ left the stocks in the yards of Messrs. John Brown & Co.,

of Glasgow; and she only arrived in Australia two years later. The

other units of the navy are of even later construction. The existence

of these vessels in Australian waters is a tribute to the enterprise

and foresight of the Commonwealth of Australia. Their history and

performance since the outbreak of the war has utterly confounded the

naval experts of this country, who, if they had had their way, would

not have had such ships in such a place.

For a quarter of a century before the foundation of the Australian

navy, the whole question of naval protection for Australasia had been

one profoundly unsatisfactory, both to the Imperial government and to

the governments of the Southern Nations. Australia and New Zealand

paid a naval subsidy to the Imperial coffers; recently it amounted

to the annual sum of £200,000 from Australia and £40,000 from New

Zealand. In return, the Admiralty maintained a number of obsolete

warcraft in Australian waters, at a cost vastly exceeding the

annual tribute. The Australasians wanted better ships; the Imperial

Government desired a larger subsidy; it was an arrangement that

pleased nobody.

The makeshift fleet in Australasian waters was explained by

postulating the theory that when trouble came, the battle for the

defence of Australasia would be fought in the North Sea, or somewhere

far from the reach of Australasian ports. The experience of the

first twelve months of the war may surely be held to have exploded

that theory. The North Sea fleet did not prevent the _Emden_ from

bombarding Madras, and sinking merchant shipping worth £2,500,000 in

Eastern waters. It would not have prevented the _Scharnhorst_ and

_Gneisenau_ from battering Wellington and Sydney, and destroying

half the ships in Australasian waters. But the theory was the pet

one of all the experts, and it was employed seriously to disturb the

pleasant relations between the Motherland and the Dominions.

For, about the year 1905, the uncontestable fact that the Dominions

were not contributing sufficiently to the naval protection of

the Empire could no longer be evaded. The question was discussed

at Colonial Conferences; it was the subject of bitter newspaper

articles. The Dominions wished to meet some part, at least, of their

great obligations, but not in the way required by the Imperial

Government. Put bluntly, the demand made of them was tribute; they

were to supply money for naval defence, and have no voice in its

expenditure.

Canada took a straightforward course, and withdrew her naval subsidy.

New Zealand, with an admirable spirit, had a Dreadnought built, and

handed it over to the Imperial Government. The battle cruiser _New

Zealand_ has done fine service in the North Sea since the outbreak of

war, but had Australia been as sentimentally generous, Australasia

would certainly have had cause to regret it.

But Australia planned to build a navy of her own; and a scheme for

the construction of the first instalment of warships was drawn up by

Rear-Admiral Sir William Cresswell, now first naval adviser to the

Commonwealth. He came to London in 1906 to support his scheme, and to

his sane and able advocacy of it Australia and the Empire owe a debt

it will be hard to repay. It would be possible to quote some of the

criticism he received here, but it would serve no good end. Suffice

to say, it was couched in the superior vein that proves so irritating

to the Colonial in Great Britain, especially when he knows he is

right.

At the Colonial Conference of 1907, the matter came up for

discussion, and Mr. Deakin and Senator Pearce, who represented

Australia, succeeded in carrying their point. Expert reports were

obtained, the probable cost was reckoned, and bravely faced; and

Australia began to build her own warships. It is an open secret that

she did so with the tacit disapproval of the Admiralty, and in face

of the violent criticism of the experts.

Thus it happened that when war broke out, the Australians were able

to place at the disposal of the Admiralty the following up-to-date

warships in Australasian waters:--

[Illustration: H.M.A.S. "Australia" in Sydney Harbour.]

The battle cruiser _Australia_ of 19,200 tons displacement, in length

555 feet, with an 80 foot beam, and a draught of 26½ feet. Her

armament consists of eight 12-inch guns, sixteen 4-inch guns, and

two torpedo tubes. Of her ship's company of 820 more than half are

Australians. She flies the flag of Rear-Admiral Sir George Patey,

K.C.V.O.

Three light cruisers: the _Sydney_, _Melbourne_, and _Brisbane_,

all of 5,600 tons displacement, and with a speed of 26 knots. (The

_Sydney_ made 27 when steaming to her duel with the _Emden_.) Each

has eight 6-inch guns, four 3-pounders, four machine guns and two

torpedo tubes. The _Sydney_ and _Melbourne_ were built in Great

Britain, but the _Brisbane_ is of local construction.

Six destroyers: the _Parramatta_, _Yarra_, _Torrens_, _Warrego_,

_Swan_, and _Derwent_. All are of the same type; of 700 tons

displacement, 26 knots speed, and carry one 4-inch gun, three

12-pounders and three torpedo tubes.

Two submarines: the AE1 and AE2.

Thus had Australia provided for the defence of her coast, at a

cost which excited strenuous criticism in the Commonwealth itself.

Until war broke out--then every penny of the money was saved by

the 12-inch guns of the _Australia_. "No," wrote an officer of the

_Scharnhorst_, shortly before Admiral Sturdee had made an end of that

armoured cruiser, "we did not raid any Australian port, nor sink any

Australasian shipping. And why? Because we knew our 8·2-inch guns

were no match for the armament of the _Australia_."

It is interesting to remember that at the launching of the

_Sydney_ Captain R. Muirhead Collins, C.M.G., the Secretary to the

Commonwealth Office in London, made a speech almost prophetic in its

prescience of the glory with which that vessel was to cover herself

in her first ocean combat.

"From time immemorial," he said, "much significance and ceremony had

been attached to the launch and christening of a ship. Apart from the

mystery of the sea, and the fact that those who went down to the sea

in ships saw the wonders of the deep, the act of placing a vessel in

the water appeals to us all strongly, because ships are freighted,

not only with human lives, but with human interests.

"How much stronger is the appeal to our emotions when ships, those

great engines of war, carried with them the future of the Empire

and of the English-speaking races under the flag? (Applause.) To

the launch, therefore, of this cruiser, as in the case of the

vessels which had preceded her, there was the added significance

that they are freighted with, or carry with them, national and

Imperial aspirations. National aspirations, because they represent

the determination of a young, strong and vigorous community, proud

of their British descent and of the glorious traditions of the sea

which they share, to be no longer satisfied to dwell under the

protection of the Mother's wing, but to take on the responsibilities

of a self-governing community and to support the Mother Country in

the great task of defence of the Empire--(applause)--and Imperial

aspirations, because we see in the unity of the Empire, which

depends on free communication by sea, the guarantee of freedom and

security of peace to all those who dwell within its borders.

"We see in the co-ordination and consolidation of the naval resources

of the Empire the chief means of its preservation, founded as it is

on maritime enterprise and supremacy. Naval defence alone, however,

will not suffice to save the Empire. Co-ordination in military

preparations will also be required, based on the recognition of

the obligation of every citizen to take his share. In this respect

Australia is setting an example in its system of national training.

(Applause.)

"We must go back to the days of ancient Greece for a record of

maritime confederacy. It failed; and the Empire, which under other

conditions it might have safeguarded, was destroyed and its peoples

conquered, because, in the words of a recent writer, the Athenians

neglected to make the outlying States of their Empire living and

active parts instead of mere dependencies on the central government.

These new vessels, which were to form the Australian unit in our

naval forces, were the embodiment of a living and active partnership

in the defence of the Empire. The Navy of Britain had always been

justly the Briton's pride. That pride and that interest should now be

extended to embrace the Navy of the Empire."

It is instructive to contrast the events in Eastern waters, where the

Admiralty, in pursuance of the great theory that the Empire was to

be saved by a battle in the North Sea, had weakened the China fleet

almost in proportion to the strength supplied in Southern waters

on Australian initiative. The operations against Kiao-Chau so far

occupied the British warships that the _Emden_ was able to bombard

Madras, to enter the British port at Singapore and to sink the

warships of our Allies while at anchor under the protection of the

Empire's flag, and to heap insult and damage upon the first sea power

of the world.

New Zealand, but for the Australian fleet, would have been as

defenceless as the East Indies. The Dominion, while thrilled with

a genuine and comprehensible pride at the fine work done elsewhere

by its Dreadnought, was frank in admitting that the practical end

of the argument lay with Australia. Mr. Massey, the Prime Minister,

in a speech of the utmost import to Australasia, declared that the

future policy of the Dominion would be one of co-operation with the

Commonwealth for the naval defence of Australasian shores.

The work of the Australian warships in the reduction of the German

Pacific Colonies has already been detailed. In the first seven weeks

of the war the _Australia_ and the _Melbourne_ covered 12,000 miles.

Not a single British merchant ship was molested in Australasian

waters, while all the German shipping in the locality was gobbled

up in the most summary fashion. Then, their work at home being

completed, the vessels of the Australian fleet set out for wider

adventures.

Some day the manœuvres which led to the destruction of the German

Pacific squadron will be described by an expert, and the world will

know what part the _Australia_ played in bringing about that desired

consummation. A cruise of 48,000 miles, by which the marauders were

swept ever farther East, was the share of the battle cruiser of the

Commonwealth. She burned 5,000 tons of coal and 6,000 tons of oil

fuel, and had the satisfaction of overhauling and sinking a big

German liner, of the Woermann line, which was fitted as a store ship

and laden with all sorts of necessaries for the German warships.

Later she was visible at a British port, where, after an official

inspection, Admiral Patey was complimented on the fact that her guns

were still in better order than those of any vessel of his Majesty's

fleets. She is now serving the Empire many thousands of miles from

her own waters, and when next the _New Zealand_ is heard of, it may

well be that the _Australia_ also will be there.

The _Melbourne_ and the _Sydney_ returned, somewhat unwillingly,

to undertake that convoy work which, incidentally, resulted so

disastrously for the _Emden_. The present outlook promises that

much will still be found for them to do in this direction, for the

passage of Australasian troops through the Indian Ocean has now

been regularized, and the supply is in course of being enormously

increased.

The fate of Submarine AE1 was later shared by AE2, in a bold attempt

to enter the Sea of Marmora, having pierced the Dardanelles as far as

the Narrows. AE2 possessed, it is claimed, the record for a submarine

in distance covered, for her operations during the war extended over

a distance of 30,000 miles. Before misfortune overtook her, she had

rendered excellent service at the Dardanelles, and was the first

submarine to penetrate the Straits and enter the Sea of Marmora. Her

officers, and all her crew save nine, fell into the hands of the

Turks, and are now in Turkish prisons.

Such has been the performance in twelve months of the vessels which

form the nucleus of a fleet which will one day consist of fifty-two

vessels and be manned by 15,000 men. It is intended by Australia that

the warships shall be manned and officered by Australians, and with

that end in view, training establishments for navel cadets and for

sailors have been established in the Commonwealth. The Australian

Naval College is still in its infancy, but it occupies a magnificent

position at Jervis Bay, about eighty miles south of Sydney, on the

coast of New South Wales.

An area of nearly fifteen square miles has been reserved for the

establishment, and modest buildings have already been erected for

the future Australian middies. A fine stream flows into the bay,

and bathing and boating facilities are admirable. The College was

occupied in March, 1915, and a start was made with twenty-four

boys of thirteen years of age, selected from a large number of

applications. The quality of the boys is illustrated by an incident

of the first few months.

One youngster, during a game of cricket, was injured so seriously

by the ball that an operation was immediately necessary. The lad

walked into surgery, and saluted the doctor, who informed him that an

anæsthetic would be necessary. The boy drew himself up proudly. "For

the credit of the service, sir," he said, "I must decline."

This naval college--the only one in the Dominions--will in 1916 have

150 picked lads in training.

The Royal Australian College is open to all classes. In the first

quota of Cadet Midshipmen--it should be noted that in Australia the

English term "Naval Cadet" has a different meaning--more than one

half were pupils of State Schools. The cadets enter the College at

the age of thirteen and from that day all their expenses are borne

by the Commonwealth Government, even to the munificent grant of one

shilling a week in pocket money. In return the boy is required to

remain in the navy for a period of twelve years on attaining the

age of eighteen, that is, on completing a four-year course at the

College. A penalty of £75 for each year's training undergone will

be imposed on parents or guardians who withdraw a cadet midshipman

without the consent of the Australian Naval Board.

Appointments to the College are made by the Minister for Defence,

upon the recommendation of the Naval Board, from such candidates as

are considered suitable by the Selection Committee, and who have

afterwards passed a qualifying examination in educational subjects.

Nominations bearing a certain proportion to the number of midshipmen

required for the College in any particular entry are allotted by the

Governor-General in Council, as nearly as possible in the following

proportions:--New South Wales, 38 per cent.; Victoria, 31 per cent.;

Queensland, 12 per cent.; South Australia, 10 per cent.; Western

Australia, 6 per cent.; Tasmania, 3 per cent.

For the selection of the most promising youths an interviewing

committee, on properly advertised dates, sits at Brisbane, Sydney,

Melbourne, Adelaide, and Hobart; Adelaide doing duty also for Western

Australia, and Brisbane for the Northern Territory and Papua. The

interviewing committee consists of the Captain of the College,

Captain of Training Ship, District Naval Officer, Director of

Education (with consent of the State Government), and a Naval Medical

Officer.

[Illustration: The Governor-General of Australia.]

On a similarly adequate basis, arrangements have been made for the

instruction of sailors on training ships at several of the chief

ports. The quality of the young Australian sailors on the _Australia_

and the _Sydney_ was one of the most satisfactory features of the

fine service rendered by those vessels.

Such, in brief, are the main features of the scheme now in successful

operation for the establishment of an adequate Australian Navy.

What has been written above is written in no sense of useless

recrimination or vainglorious boasting. The Dominions are asking for

a conference with the Imperial authorities to discuss matters of

Empire defence. One of the reasons which impels them to press for

it now, and not hereafter, may be found in a conversation in which

a leading citizen from Overseas voiced an opinion too little heard

in Great Britain, but familiar enough to those who are in touch with

Oversea ideals.

"You shout with rage," he said, "when some big German cruisers

slip across the sea in the night and pump a few shells into a

one-horse town like Scarborough. But when a little ashcan like the

_Emden_ holds up the proudest ports in your wide Empire, and gets

off scot-free with her little 4-inch guns, you chuckle and say her

captain is a fine sport. A conference is wanted to teach some of your

big men a little Empire sense."

Perhaps there is something in that.

THE HEART OF EMPIRE STIRRED

Glorious Deeds of Australasians in the Great War · 第 27 / 30 章