Tradition gives an early date to the first signs of sympathy between

Z̆iz̆ka and Hus. Within a walk of the village of Husinec stands the old

town of Prachatice, where the ruins are still shown of the school in

which Z̆iz̆ka and Hus are said to have studied together. However this

may be, there can be no doubt that it was very soon after the death of

Hus that Z̆iz̆ka began to assume that position of leadership among the

extremer Utraquists, which ultimately gained him such fame both among

friends and enemies. This section of Reformers had already discovered

that they did not receive that sympathy from the citizens of Prague

which they believed to be their due. Many of them were compelled to

leave the city; and they gathered together on a mountain near Austi,

to which they gave the name of Tabor, and to which their supporters

gradually flocked from all parts of the kingdom. These gatherings so

alarmed Wenceslaus that they even weakened his hostility to the Council

of Constance; and not only the followers of Nicholaus and Z̆iz̆ka,

but even some of the more moderate Utraquists became objects of his

suspicion.

This change of feeling naturally increased the hopes of Sigismund,

and he became even more sanguine of success, and more bitter against

the followers of Hus, when the Council of Constance elected, under

the name of Pope Martin V., that Cardinal Colonna, who had urged upon

John XXIII. the first proposal for the condemnation of Hus. Under

the influence of this new Pope, all the schemes of reform, which the

Council had once thought of considering, were sacrificed to the one

aim of the suppression of heresy; and in April, 1418, the Pope secured

himself a freer hand by dissolving the Council of Constance.

Urged, then, by pressure from Emperor and Pope, and by his own fear of

Utraquistic excesses, Wenceslaus banished one of the Reformers from

Prague, and recalled the Catholic clergy, who had been expelled from

the city. He discovered, indeed, that Utraquism had taken so deep a

root in Prague that it would be necessary to grant at least three

churches to its preachers. But this concession did not satisfy the more

zealous champions of the cause; and the favour shown by the King to the

Catholics provoked riots among the Reformers. Then Wenceslaus demanded

that the citizens should all give up their arms to him.

Z̆iz̆ka now saw that the controversy with the Catholics must sooner

or later end in war; and he was determined that his followers should

not be unprovided for such a struggle. He therefore resolved to obey

the royal summons, but in a peculiar manner of his own. He gathered

together his followers, led them into the presence of the King, and

assured him that they were ready to stand by him, with life and

property, against his enemies. The unfortunate Wenceslaus felt bound to

thank Z̆iz̆ka and his followers for this loyal declaration; but Z̆iz̆ka

knew well enough that he had thereby forfeited the royal favour. He

therefore quickly retired from Court, and joined Nicholaus of Hus in

organising their followers on Mount Tabor. The alarm of Wenceslaus

was naturally increased by these proceedings; and he began to meet

the opposition by deposing the Town Councillors in the different

divisions of Prague, and thrusting in their opponents. This was a more

arbitrary act of power than he had yet resorted to in this struggle;

and it naturally hastened on the violent crisis which had long been

approaching.

The quarter in which the outbreak finally took place had a peculiar

character of its own, which some historians believe to have affected

the character of the coming struggle. It will be remembered that

Charles IV. had done much, not merely to develop the intellectual

greatness of Prague, but also to increase its physical size. A

completely new suburb had been added during that reign, which was

known as the New Town of Prague. This division of the city was

governed by its own Council, and rapidly assumed a peculiar character.

Charles’s policy attracted many Germans to the city; and, while the

more prominent struggle between the rival “Nations” of the University

had been growing in intensity, it is believed by some that an equally

bitter feeling had been springing up among those Bohemian workmen who

had fallen under the rule of German employers of labour. The historians

who hold this view maintain that the workmen, who desired to escape

from this domination, fled from the older parts of Prague, and found

new possibilities of life and of organisation in the New Town. Whether

this migration can be clearly proved or no, it is certain that, both

at this and later crises, there appears a more democratic and, in some

respects, a more national spirit in the movements which had their rise

in the New Town, than in those of other parts of the city.

It was then, in the church of St. Stephen, in the New Town, that on

the 30th of July, 1419, a fiery preacher named John of Seelau (Zelív)

delivered a sermon in the presence of an excited crowd of the followers

of Z̆iz̆ka. After being worked up by pictures of the coming judgment,

these fiery reformers marched in procession through the streets. As

they passed the Council House, some insult appears to have been offered

them by those who were looking out of the windows; whereupon the

infuriated Utraquists rushed upstairs into the council chamber, and

hurled the newly-elected Councillors from the window, the crowd below

receiving the falling men on the points of their spikes. Then Z̆iz̆ka

and his friends proceeded to seize the town into their hands, elected

four captains for each district, and appointed Councillors in the place

of those who had been killed.

Wenceslaus was furious at this news, and vowed that he would

exterminate all Wyclifites and Hussites. Many of his advisers, however,

were still in sympathy with the principle of Utraquism; and they

persuaded the King to come to terms with the rioters, and to confirm

the election of the new Councillors. The excitement of the controversy

and the humiliation of this confession were too much for the strength

of Wenceslaus. He was seized with a fever; and, in August, 1419, ended

at last his long and tragic reign.

The concessions into which Wenceslaus had been persuaded by his queen

and his nobles, produced less effect on the minds of the citizens of

Prague than the violent threats which had preceded them; and, at the

time of his death, the feeling against him was so fierce that his

friends did not venture to give him a public funeral, but buried him

secretly by night. A still plainer evidence of this feeling was shown

in the renewal of the riots against the monks. Altars, organs, and

images of saints were destroyed; and many of the monks were driven out

of the city.

Several of the nobles who had been hitherto inclined to the Utraquist

cause, were so much alarmed at these excesses that they called upon

Sigismund, as next heir to the throne, to hasten to Bohemia, to restore

order. The messengers found him preparing to start on an expedition

against the Turks; and his German and Hungarian councillors persuaded

him to delay his visit to Bohemia, until he could enter it at the head

of a victorious army. He therefore appointed Wenceslaus’s widow Sophia

as regent in his place; and he chose a council to assist her, of which

the most prominent member was C̆enĕk of Wartenberg.

C̆enĕk was one of those men who will always receive more condemnation

and less pity than are their due. He was evidently a man of some

attractive qualities, and, originally at least, of excellent

intentions. He had taken the lead in the protest against the execution

of Hus; and, if he had shown himself somewhat too tolerant towards

the early excesses of Z̆iz̆ka and his friends, he had at least helped

to preserve Wenceslaus from being driven by those acts into the arms

of Sigismund. But to steer the kingdom through the dangers with which

it was threatened by the fierce intolerance of Sigismund on the one

hand, and of Z̆iz̆ka on the other, required stronger nerve and clearer

purpose than C̆enĕk possessed; and thus his continual changes of party

were effected in a manner which have left a deep stain on his memory.

When the Bohemian Assembly first met to consider the position of

affairs, it seemed as if the moderate Utraquists would be able

to carry the day; for a resolution was passed that the Estates

would only consent to the coronation of Sigismund on the following

conditions: First, that he would permit the Communion in both kinds

to be celebrated in all the churches, and would try to procure the

sanction of the Pope to this practice. Secondly, that he would place

no clergy in temporal authority. Thirdly, that he would not permit the

publication of any Papal Bulls until they had received the approval of

the King’s Council. Fourthly, that he would not appoint any foreigners

to either temporal or spiritual offices, nor set German magistrates

over towns where Bohemians dwelt. Lastly, that the proceedings of the

law-courts should be conducted in the Bohemian language. These were the

principal demands of the nobles; but the citizens of Prague, who were

daily gaining greater influence in the councils of the State, added

certain conditions of their own. These were that Sigismund should grant

an amnesty for the recent disturbances; that he should not permit the

establishment in Prague of any more houses of ill-fame; and that he

should permit the reading of at least the Gospel and Epistle in the

Bohemian language. Such a programme might seem to unite for the moment

all sections of Bohemians who desired peace and independence for their

country; but, when Sigismund replied by putting aside the whole of

these demands, and declaring that he would only promise to govern as

his father had governed before him, the situation was entirely changed.

Strange as it sounds, in speaking of so turbulent a country, it is

none the less true that, till this time, there had been no instance

of a combined national resistance in Bohemia to a King who was the

sole lawful claimant of the throne. There had been plenty of instances

of setting up rival members of the royal family against each other;

attempts by discontented nobles to call in a foreign King or Emperor

to their help; and even something like a provincial insurrection of

Moravia against Bohemia; but that the National Assembly of Bohemia

should formally commit itself to an attempt to exclude from the

country the lawful heir to the throne, who was at once the only living

representative of the House of Luxemburg, and the ruler of the Holy

Roman Empire--this was a step so unprecedented that it may well have

caused hesitation in those who were called upon to take it.

Doubtless this difficulty might have been avoided if Sophia could have

ventured on more independent action. But the Queen, though she had

exercised so useful an influence over her husband during his lifetime,

seems, after his death, to have fallen completely into the background,

and to have taken her cue from Sigismund, or from his principal

advisers.

The result, then, of the deliberations of the Bohemian Assembly was

that the nation was broken up into three parties. These were as

follows: (1) The Catholic Party, which was in favour of complete

submission to Sigismund. (2) The Moderate Utraquist Party which would

have accepted him if he would have granted some amount of religious

liberty. (3) The Extreme Reforming Party, which thoroughly distrusted

Sigismund, and desired to throw off his authority. The first of these

parties found its supporters chiefly in Moravia, and particularly in

the German-speaking districts of that province. By a strange irony

of fortune, its leader was that Wenceslaus of Duba who had stood so

gallantly by Hus at the Council of Constance. But though he, and one or

two others of the party, may have cherished some national aspirations,

they were, as a body, too much out of sympathy with the keen Slavonic

feeling of the country to be reckoned as a Bohemian party at all. The

second party, which gradually acquired the name of Calixtines, from the

importance which they attached to the custom of granting the Cup to the

laity, were really composed of two very different elements. Many of the

great nobles, while theoretically zealous for the Cup, were far more

anxious to maintain that position in the country which largely depended

on the favour of the king; while, on the other hand, learned preachers

like Jakaubek of Kladrau were as zealous for the reforms which they

desired as many of the extremer Utraquists could be, and would have

risked and sacrificed as much to secure them.

[Illustration: ENTRANCE INTO FORTIFIED PART OF TABOR.]

But, though men like Jakaubek of Kladrau had an important part to play

in the coming struggle, it was from the third Bohemian party that there

were to be drawn the most determined fighters, and the most impressive

figures, in the struggle of Bohemia against the German Emperor. This

party had been founded by those fiery spirits who had been banished

from Prague by Wenceslaus; and they derived their name of Taborite

from the mountain which they had made their chief place of refuge

after their expulsion from Prague. So great was the enthusiasm which

they caused that, when Wenceslaus forbade any further visits to Tabor

under penalty of death and confiscation of goods, large numbers of

the peasantry willingly sacrificed all their possessions, and risked

the chance of death, to unite themselves with this chosen band. A

community so formed naturally developed very remarkable qualities; and

a stern Puritanical gloom, combined with the Puritanical nobleness

of aspiration, rapidly showed itself among them. Rich and poor

shared their food with each other; no strife or theft was permitted;

intoxicating liquors were excluded from the mountain; and not only was

gambling forbidden to the elders, but even the children were deprived

of their games. Such is the account given of the Taborites by a

somewhat hostile chronicler, who thus proceeds to describe their manner

of passing the day:

“Having then completed the moderate refreshment of the body, the

priests rise with the people to give thanks to God. They march round

the Mount of Tabor, bearing the venerable Eucharist--the virgins

preceding the Sacrament, and the men and women in their squadrons

following, all shouting and singing psalms as seems convenient. When

this procession is finished, they exchange farewells with their clergy,

not bending to the right or left lest they should trample on the wheat;

and so they come to the place whence they started.” These people,

already prepared for religious enthusiasm by the stern discipline of

such a life as this, were kindled yet further by fiery sermons, founded

chiefly on the visions of the Apocalypse, in which prophecies were

delivered of the speedy coming of Christ, and the reign of the Saints,

which was to be hastened by the putting to death of the enemies of

Christ. They were told that they were to bathe and sanctify their hands

in the blood of their enemies; and that, while they were to imitate the

zeal and indignation of their Master, this was not the time to imitate

His gentleness. All human learning, said the fiercer of the preachers,

was to be treated with contempt; and the taking of degrees at the

University was a vanity.

Nor was it only the training, which they had received from their

preachers, that prepared the Taborites for the part which they were

to play in the coming struggle. Z̆iz̆ka was eminently fitted to be

the hero of a revolutionary party. To a fiery sincerity, and a steady

devotion to that high ideal of life which was implied in the Taborite

creed, he united a genius for leadership and organisation which the

greatest generals might have envied; a statesmanlike instinct for

seizing the right moment and the right course of action; and a savage

ferocity which none of his opponents could surpass.

[Illustration: HOUSE IN TABOR WITH OLD TABORITE COMMUNION TABLE IN

FRONT OF IT.]

But, though this fiery band, and their uncompromising leader, were to

give the tone to the struggle which was fast approaching, one passing

hint was given, before the outbreak of the war, of the presence among

the Bohemians of gentler spirits who would gain a hearing at a later

and more appropriate time. One or more of those Taborites, who had not

imbibed that contempt for learning which had been inculcated by their

wilder preachers, applied to the Masters of the Prague University, to

know whether war on behalf of religion was not forbidden by the command

to Peter to put up his sword into his sheath. Jakaubek answered, on

behalf of his colleagues, that, though a war for the propagation of the

Faith was undoubtedly forbidden to Christians, yet a defensive war for

the protection of the Faith was certainly lawful.

This question, as has been already suggested, has more importance as

a prophecy of future religious developments than as a characteristic

utterance of the period. But the answer has a more immediate

significance, as indicating a policy which was to separate the learned

professors of the University from the more aristocratic section of

the Calixtines. This difference has already been referred to above;

but it requires to be emphasized and developed. In the case of C̆enek

of Wartenberg the difference seems to have been partly due to a sense

of loyalty to the House of Luxemburg, and to a shrinking from some of

the violences in which the Taborites indulged. But C̆enek’s prominent

position in his party was not due solely to his personal qualities

or even to his personal rank. It was also largely derived from the

guardianship which he possessed over the lands of Rosenberg; and this

position must also be considered as colouring the character of his

policy.

Ulric von Rosenberg, like his guardian C̆enek, played a somewhat

questionable and uncertain part in the coming struggle. But the times

and circumstances of his changes of position lead one to attribute to

him somewhat different motives of action from those which influenced

his guardian. He seems to have begun his career as a decided Utraquist;

but his subsequent oppressions of his Utraquist dependents show a

bitterer change of feeling than can be laid to the charge of C̆enek;

while his special opposition to Z̆iz̆ka seems to mark the real ground

of his questionable policy. In mere doctrine he may have had some

sympathy with the reforming movement; but he was soon alarmed by the

democratic character of the Taborite party and of its leader; and the

great power which had been so long wielded by the Rosenbergs, was

thrown, in the main, into the defence of aristocratic privileges and

feudal rights. For the moment, however, the nobles could put forward

the excuse that they were supporting the claims of a Queen, who was

not stained with the blood of Hus, nor committed to an anti-national

policy; and, it was on her behalf that C̆enek now organised a standing

army, and seized into his hands several important fortresses.

Z̆iz̆ka, on his part, felt that no time was to be lost in saving the

cause for which he desired to struggle. So, at the head of a band of

his drilled peasants, he suddenly marched upon the fortress of the

Vys̆ehrad, drove out the royalist garrison, and put his own men in

their place. Then, on the 10th of November, the Taborites set out in

various bands, from the three or four towns which were occupied by

their party; and they marched to Prague, to hold a great meeting

there. The main body met at the town of Zinkov, where they organised

their forces before proceeding on their march. But three hundred men

had started alone from Austi, apparently ill-armed and ill-prepared for

attack. This detached body was met on its way by one of the royalist

nobles; and on the first attack he put to flight the men of Austi with

much slaughter.

The fugitives escaped to Knin, at which point the main body of their

friends had now arrived. Baron von Sternberg, the general of the

royalists, marched thither to meet the advancing Taborites, and

probably hoped to obtain an easy victory. But the sturdy peasants

repelled his attack with such vigour that the royalists were forced to

retreat; and on the 4th of November, 1419, the Taborites entered Prague

without further opposition. The royalist party were at once called to

arms; while, on the other side, Nicholaus of Hus and Z̆iz̆ka marched

into the Small Division of Prague, and, after a fierce struggle, seized

upon the great fortress, which still overlooks the town. The Queen fled

from Prague under the protection of Ulric of Rosenberg. C̆enek in the

meantime gathered new forces on her behalf, and persuaded several towns

to declare for the royalist cause.

[Illustration: FIGURE OF MINER WITH MINING LAMP AND STAFF IN CHURCH OF

ST. BARBARA AT KUTTENBERG (KUTNA HORA).]

[Illustration: KUTNA HORA, OFFICE WHERE THE COINS WERE STRUCK BY THE

ITALIANS BROUGHT TO KUTNA HORA BY WENCESLAUS II.]

Each party was now conscious of the strength of its opponents; and,

under such circumstances, those moderate citizens of Prague who

combined a zeal for freedom with a desire for peace, were able to

hold the balance between the contending parties. So a compromise was

effected, by which the queen and the nobles were pledged to protect

religious liberty and especially Communion in both kinds; while the

citizens, on their part, consented to restore the fortress of Vys̆ehrad

to the Queen, and to abstain from any injuries to churches or images.

Z̆iz̆ka, however, distrusted the Queen’s party, and was discontented

with these terms. So he withdrew with most of his troops to his chief

fortress of Pilsen (Plz̆en).

[Illustration: TOWN COUNCIL HOUSE OF PILSEN (PLZEN).]

Although the recovery of the Vys̆ehrad was an important gain to the

royalist cause, the great centre of the extreme Catholic feeling was

the town of Kutna Hora. That town, from its importance as a mining

centre, and from the special favour shown to it by the kings, had

become a kind of rival to Prague; and in a time of civil war such

rivalry naturally ripened into active hostility of the fiercest

description. In spite of the occasional fierceness of such outbursts

as that which had produced the slaughter of the Councillors of the

New Town, there had been, till now, little organised cruelty in the

contest between the two parties. Now, however, whether actuated by

municipal rivalry or religious hostility, the men of Kutna Hora began

to inaugurate a system of persecution which was to produce terrible

reprisals. They seized upon all the Utraquists whom they could find,

and even paid other towns so much a head to send them victims. Some

of these they buried alive in pits; some they burnt, and some they

beheaded; so that in a short time more than sixteen hundred had been

put to death.

In the meantime Sigismund had returned from Hungary to Moravia; and in

Christmas, 1419, he and Queen Sophia held a meeting at Brünn (Brno).

The citizens of Prague sent a deputation to this assembly to entreat

for terms of peace. Sigismund ordered them at once to pull down all the

chains which they had placed across the streets; to destroy all their

new fortifications; and to bring back the Catholic priests who had been

driven out. The citizens were so anxious to avoid a collision with

Sigismund that they consented to these terms; and they destroyed their

fortifications amid the jeers of the Catholics and Germans.

Z̆iz̆ka now fully realised the impossibility of any compromise, and

he prepared for a desperate struggle. His first intention had been to

make the town of Pilsen the centre of his operations. From that town he

had succeeded in driving out all the Catholics; and its fortifications

were so strong that he hoped to make it good against all comers. But

the growing strength of the fortress of Tabor led him to change his

opinion; and he decided to withdraw from Pilsen, and to concentrate

the whole force of his followers on the mountain from which they

took their name. According to one account, the divisions in Pilsen

itself were the main cause of this decision. Certainly some special

explanation is needed of a step which proved, in one way, so disastrous

to the reforming cause; for, during all the victories gained by the

Utraquists, they were never able to recover this important fortress

again.

Bohemia, from the earliest times to the fall of national independence in 1620 With a short summary of later events · 第 15 / 34 段